Sample poster

S
Position Your Body for Learning implements evidence
based measurements into an activity for optimal positioning.
“Roll” and “rattle” allow a therapist to assess if desk height
matches elbow rest height. “Rumble” allows a similar
assessment for matching popliteal height to chair height.
Pedal an imaginary
bicycle with your
hands
(hands rotating
over each other)
Drum palms of
hands on
desk top
While sitting in your
chair, make your
feet run in place
Freeze with hands
and feet quiet.
Now you are ready
to work!
Although proper ergonomic positioning and adjustment of
classroom furniture has been identified as an important role
for school-based occupational therapists, it is infrequently
addressed. Particularly for young students (pre-k through
elementary), optimal seating improves attention to task, fine
motor skills, and performance on standardized tests. Over-
sized classroom desks and chairs are a common problem
for k-12 students creating physical concerns such as pain in
the neck, shoulders, thighs, knees, and feet. Research
suggests that matching popliteal height to chair height and
elbow rest height to desk height can be effective in
providing better classroom furniture fit for students. The No
Child Left Behind initiative places emphasis on the
outcomes of standardized tests. California Statewide
Assessments (used to rate districts, schools, administrators,
teachers, and students) allow for variations, modifications,
and accommodations, including positioning during test
administration. With a good fit, students are more
comfortable, less likely to wiggle and fidget in order to avoid
pain, and more able to efficiently perform desk-top tasks
such as classroom learning and testing.
Angela R. Baker, PhD, MA, OTR/L, CTRS, OTD candidate
Abstract Tools for Implementation
Implications
Applications
Student test scores on California Statewide Assessments may
improve when provided with optimal seating (seat pan height
that matches popliteal height and desk-top height that
matches elbow rest height)(Sents,1989[2b]; Smith-Zuzovsky,
2004[2b]). Seating changes are permitted through the Matrix
of Test Variations, Accommodations, and Modifications for
Administration of California Statewide Assessments (2011[5]).
Castellucci, I., Goncalves, M. A., & Arezes, P. M. (2010, July). Ergonomic design of school furniture: Challenges for
the Portuguese schools. Applied Human Factors an Ergonomics International Conference.
Dhara, P. C., Khaspuri, G., & Sau, S. K. (2009). Complaints arising from a mismatch between school furniture and
anthropometric measurements of rural secondary school children during classwork. Environmental Health and
Preventative Medicine, 14, 36-45.
Gouvali, M. K., & Boudolos, K. (2005). Match between school furniture dimensions and children’s anthropometry.
Applied Ergonomics, 37, 765-773.
Matrix of Test Variations, Accommodations, and Modifications for Administration of California Statewide Assessments.
(2011). In 2012 Testing Variations, Accommodations, and Modifications. Sacramento, CA: California Department of
Education.
Reilly, D. S., Van Donkelaar, P., Saavedra, S., & Woollacott, M. H. (2008, March). Interaction between the
development of postural control and the executive function of attention. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40(2), 90-102.
Sents, B. E., & Marks, H. E. (1989, October). Changes in preschool children’s IQ scores as a function of positioning.
The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43(10), 685-687.
Smith-Zuzovsky, N., & Exner, C. E. (2004, July-August). The effect of seated positioning quality on typical 6-and 7-
year-old children’s object manipulation skills. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58(4), 380-388.
Special Education Division, California Department of Education. (2010). Chapter 7 Services for School-Age Children.
In F. Ong, & D. Boomer (Eds.), Guidelines for Occupational Therapy and Physical Therapy in California Public
Schools (Second Edition). Sacramento, CA: CDE Press.
Straker, L., Maslen, B., Burgess-Limerick, R., Johnson, P., & Dennerlein, J. (2010, April). Evidence-based guidelines
for the wise use of computers by children: Physical development guidelines. Ergonomics, 53(4), 458-477.
Positioning for Improved Performance at School: Making the
Occupation of Learning “Fit”
MEASURING FOR OPTIMAL POSITIONING (MOP)
• Optimal seating improves attention to task (Reilly et al.,
2008 [4a]), fine motor skills (Smith-Zuzovsky & Exner,
2004[2b]), and performance on standardized tests (Sents
& Marks, 1989[2b]; Smith-Zuzovsky & Exner, 2004[2b]).
• The most common school furniture problems are desks
and chairs that are too big (Dhara et al., 2009[3b];
Gouvali & Boudolos, 2005[4a]; Reilly et al., 2008[4a];
Sents & Marks, 1989[2b]; Smith-Zuzovsky & Exner,
2004[2b]; Straker et al., 2009[5]).
• Matching popliteal height to chair height and elbow rest
height to desk height can be effective in providing a
better classroom furniture fit for students (Castellucci et
al., 2010[4b]; Dhara et al., 2009[3b]; Gouvali & Boudolos,
2005[4a]; Straker et al. 2010[5]; Tunay & Melemez,
2008[4a]).
Literature Cited
SIMPLE MODIFICATION OPTIONS
Applicable Results
Photos courtesy of OT to the Rescue, 2012
Photo Courtesy of Google Images, 2012
Student name: Teacher: Date of measurement: Date desk/chair was adjusted:
Popliteal Height Elbow Rest Height Chair Pan Height Desk Height
Measurement in inches:: Measurement in inches: Measurement in inches: Measurement in inches:
INTERPRETATION OF MEASURES
The chair for this student is
currently: (please circle one)
Too big
(The chair pan height is more than 2
inches higher than popliteal height)
Good fit
(The chair pan height is within 2
inches of popliteal height)
Too small
(The chair pan height is more than 2
inches lower than popliteal height)
The desk for this student is
currently: (please circle one)
Too big
(The desk height is more than 2 inches
higher than elbow rest height)
Good fit
(The desk height is within 2 inches of
elbow rest height)
Too small
(The desk height is more than 2 inches
lower than elbow rest height)
MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT
Changes to be made for Chair:
(please circle one)
Choose a different chair Use a posture block Use a booster
Changes to be made for Desk:
(please circle one)
Choose a different desk Adjust legs of desk Remove tray from underneath
desk (if safe)
Description of modifications done:
Person completing MOP:
1 sur 1

Contenu connexe

Plus de stanbridge

Micro Lab 3 LectureMicro Lab 3 Lecture
Micro Lab 3 Lecturestanbridge
5.8K vues43 diapositives
Creating a poster v2Creating a poster v2
Creating a poster v2stanbridge
866 vues8 diapositives
Creating a posterCreating a poster
Creating a posterstanbridge
602 vues8 diapositives
Ot5101 005 week 5Ot5101 005 week 5
Ot5101 005 week 5stanbridge
512 vues20 diapositives
Ot5101 005 week4Ot5101 005 week4
Ot5101 005 week4stanbridge
372 vues22 diapositives

Plus de stanbridge(20)

Micro Lab 3 LectureMicro Lab 3 Lecture
Micro Lab 3 Lecture
stanbridge5.8K vues
Creating a poster v2Creating a poster v2
Creating a poster v2
stanbridge866 vues
Creating a posterCreating a poster
Creating a poster
stanbridge602 vues
OT 5018 Thesis DisseminationOT 5018 Thesis Dissemination
OT 5018 Thesis Dissemination
stanbridge383 vues
Ot5101 005 week 5Ot5101 005 week 5
Ot5101 005 week 5
stanbridge512 vues
Ot5101 005 week4Ot5101 005 week4
Ot5101 005 week4
stanbridge372 vues
OT 5101 week2 theory policyOT 5101 week2 theory policy
OT 5101 week2 theory policy
stanbridge188 vues
Ot5101 week1Ot5101 week1
Ot5101 week1
stanbridge204 vues
NUR 304 Chapter005NUR 304 Chapter005
NUR 304 Chapter005
stanbridge692 vues
NUR 3043 Chapter007NUR 3043 Chapter007
NUR 3043 Chapter007
stanbridge1.4K vues
NUR 3043 Chapter006NUR 3043 Chapter006
NUR 3043 Chapter006
stanbridge475 vues
NUR 3043 Chapter004NUR 3043 Chapter004
NUR 3043 Chapter004
stanbridge477 vues
3043 Chapter0093043 Chapter009
3043 Chapter009
stanbridge524 vues
 3043 Chapter008 3043 Chapter008
3043 Chapter008
stanbridge466 vues
Melnyk ppt chapter_21Melnyk ppt chapter_21
Melnyk ppt chapter_21
stanbridge332 vues
Melnyk ppt chapter_22Melnyk ppt chapter_22
Melnyk ppt chapter_22
stanbridge765 vues
Education  week 1 chapter 1Education  week 1 chapter 1
Education week 1 chapter 1
stanbridge768 vues

Dernier

Narration  ppt.pptxNarration  ppt.pptx
Narration ppt.pptxTariq KHAN
62 vues24 diapositives
Sociology KS5Sociology KS5
Sociology KS5WestHatch
50 vues23 diapositives
Psychology KS5Psychology KS5
Psychology KS5WestHatch
53 vues5 diapositives

Dernier(20)

Narration  ppt.pptxNarration  ppt.pptx
Narration ppt.pptx
Tariq KHAN62 vues
Structure and Functions of Cell.pdfStructure and Functions of Cell.pdf
Structure and Functions of Cell.pdf
Nithya Murugan142 vues
Sociology KS5Sociology KS5
Sociology KS5
WestHatch50 vues
Psychology KS5Psychology KS5
Psychology KS5
WestHatch53 vues
Dance KS5 BreakdownDance KS5 Breakdown
Dance KS5 Breakdown
WestHatch52 vues
ICANNICANN
ICANN
RajaulKarim2057 vues
Chemistry of sex hormones.pptxChemistry of sex hormones.pptx
Chemistry of sex hormones.pptx
RAJ K. MAURYA97 vues
CWP_23995_2013_17_11_2023_FINAL_ORDER.pdfCWP_23995_2013_17_11_2023_FINAL_ORDER.pdf
CWP_23995_2013_17_11_2023_FINAL_ORDER.pdf
SukhwinderSingh895865467 vues
GSoC 2024GSoC 2024
GSoC 2024
DeveloperStudentClub1049 vues
Universe revised.pdfUniverse revised.pdf
Universe revised.pdf
DrHafizKosar84 vues
Nico Baumbach IMR Media ComponentNico Baumbach IMR Media Component
Nico Baumbach IMR Media Component
InMediaRes1186 vues
Education and Diversity.pptxEducation and Diversity.pptx
Education and Diversity.pptx
DrHafizKosar56 vues
Classification of crude drugs.pptxClassification of crude drugs.pptx
Classification of crude drugs.pptx
GayatriPatra1449 vues
ICS3211_lecture 08_2023.pdfICS3211_lecture 08_2023.pdf
ICS3211_lecture 08_2023.pdf
Vanessa Camilleri68 vues

Sample poster

  • 1. Position Your Body for Learning implements evidence based measurements into an activity for optimal positioning. “Roll” and “rattle” allow a therapist to assess if desk height matches elbow rest height. “Rumble” allows a similar assessment for matching popliteal height to chair height. Pedal an imaginary bicycle with your hands (hands rotating over each other) Drum palms of hands on desk top While sitting in your chair, make your feet run in place Freeze with hands and feet quiet. Now you are ready to work! Although proper ergonomic positioning and adjustment of classroom furniture has been identified as an important role for school-based occupational therapists, it is infrequently addressed. Particularly for young students (pre-k through elementary), optimal seating improves attention to task, fine motor skills, and performance on standardized tests. Over- sized classroom desks and chairs are a common problem for k-12 students creating physical concerns such as pain in the neck, shoulders, thighs, knees, and feet. Research suggests that matching popliteal height to chair height and elbow rest height to desk height can be effective in providing better classroom furniture fit for students. The No Child Left Behind initiative places emphasis on the outcomes of standardized tests. California Statewide Assessments (used to rate districts, schools, administrators, teachers, and students) allow for variations, modifications, and accommodations, including positioning during test administration. With a good fit, students are more comfortable, less likely to wiggle and fidget in order to avoid pain, and more able to efficiently perform desk-top tasks such as classroom learning and testing. Angela R. Baker, PhD, MA, OTR/L, CTRS, OTD candidate Abstract Tools for Implementation Implications Applications Student test scores on California Statewide Assessments may improve when provided with optimal seating (seat pan height that matches popliteal height and desk-top height that matches elbow rest height)(Sents,1989[2b]; Smith-Zuzovsky, 2004[2b]). Seating changes are permitted through the Matrix of Test Variations, Accommodations, and Modifications for Administration of California Statewide Assessments (2011[5]). Castellucci, I., Goncalves, M. A., & Arezes, P. M. (2010, July). Ergonomic design of school furniture: Challenges for the Portuguese schools. Applied Human Factors an Ergonomics International Conference. Dhara, P. C., Khaspuri, G., & Sau, S. K. (2009). Complaints arising from a mismatch between school furniture and anthropometric measurements of rural secondary school children during classwork. Environmental Health and Preventative Medicine, 14, 36-45. Gouvali, M. K., & Boudolos, K. (2005). Match between school furniture dimensions and children’s anthropometry. Applied Ergonomics, 37, 765-773. Matrix of Test Variations, Accommodations, and Modifications for Administration of California Statewide Assessments. (2011). In 2012 Testing Variations, Accommodations, and Modifications. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education. Reilly, D. S., Van Donkelaar, P., Saavedra, S., & Woollacott, M. H. (2008, March). Interaction between the development of postural control and the executive function of attention. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40(2), 90-102. Sents, B. E., & Marks, H. E. (1989, October). Changes in preschool children’s IQ scores as a function of positioning. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43(10), 685-687. Smith-Zuzovsky, N., & Exner, C. E. (2004, July-August). The effect of seated positioning quality on typical 6-and 7- year-old children’s object manipulation skills. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58(4), 380-388. Special Education Division, California Department of Education. (2010). Chapter 7 Services for School-Age Children. In F. Ong, & D. Boomer (Eds.), Guidelines for Occupational Therapy and Physical Therapy in California Public Schools (Second Edition). Sacramento, CA: CDE Press. Straker, L., Maslen, B., Burgess-Limerick, R., Johnson, P., & Dennerlein, J. (2010, April). Evidence-based guidelines for the wise use of computers by children: Physical development guidelines. Ergonomics, 53(4), 458-477. Positioning for Improved Performance at School: Making the Occupation of Learning “Fit” MEASURING FOR OPTIMAL POSITIONING (MOP) • Optimal seating improves attention to task (Reilly et al., 2008 [4a]), fine motor skills (Smith-Zuzovsky & Exner, 2004[2b]), and performance on standardized tests (Sents & Marks, 1989[2b]; Smith-Zuzovsky & Exner, 2004[2b]). • The most common school furniture problems are desks and chairs that are too big (Dhara et al., 2009[3b]; Gouvali & Boudolos, 2005[4a]; Reilly et al., 2008[4a]; Sents & Marks, 1989[2b]; Smith-Zuzovsky & Exner, 2004[2b]; Straker et al., 2009[5]). • Matching popliteal height to chair height and elbow rest height to desk height can be effective in providing a better classroom furniture fit for students (Castellucci et al., 2010[4b]; Dhara et al., 2009[3b]; Gouvali & Boudolos, 2005[4a]; Straker et al. 2010[5]; Tunay & Melemez, 2008[4a]). Literature Cited SIMPLE MODIFICATION OPTIONS Applicable Results Photos courtesy of OT to the Rescue, 2012 Photo Courtesy of Google Images, 2012 Student name: Teacher: Date of measurement: Date desk/chair was adjusted: Popliteal Height Elbow Rest Height Chair Pan Height Desk Height Measurement in inches:: Measurement in inches: Measurement in inches: Measurement in inches: INTERPRETATION OF MEASURES The chair for this student is currently: (please circle one) Too big (The chair pan height is more than 2 inches higher than popliteal height) Good fit (The chair pan height is within 2 inches of popliteal height) Too small (The chair pan height is more than 2 inches lower than popliteal height) The desk for this student is currently: (please circle one) Too big (The desk height is more than 2 inches higher than elbow rest height) Good fit (The desk height is within 2 inches of elbow rest height) Too small (The desk height is more than 2 inches lower than elbow rest height) MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT Changes to be made for Chair: (please circle one) Choose a different chair Use a posture block Use a booster Changes to be made for Desk: (please circle one) Choose a different desk Adjust legs of desk Remove tray from underneath desk (if safe) Description of modifications done: Person completing MOP: