3. CULTURAL MESSAGES COME
FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES
– Domestic
– International
– Global
although most common challenges are
addressed by nations, a global civil society is
emerging
3 Cross-Cultural Management
4. PEOPLE LOOK AT ALTERNATIVE
ENTITIES FOR CULTURAL DIRECTION
• Affiliative groups e.g., ethnic groups
• Nongovernmental organizations, e.g., the
Women’s League for Peace and Freedom
• Religious groups
• Regional associations, e.g., Economic Union
• Business organizations
4 Cross-Cultural Management
5. Multiple messages and sources
create CONFUSION AND
UNCERTAINTY
• Leading to new questions national cultures are
less well able to answer
– but
• In a global society, we don’t have a sense of the
appropriate rules by which all can live
5 Cross-Cultural Management
6. TRANSITION TIME?
• Are we at a point
where nationality is
less important to
culture than in the
past? All of
Us
6 Cross-Cultural Management
7. WE SEE THAT SOME VALUES
ARE COVERGING, OTHERS ARE
NOT
• The Planet Project
• The Roper Poll of Values
• The World Values Survey
• The GLOBE Project
7 Cross-Cultural Management
8. GLOBE RESPONSES ON GENDER
EGALITARIANISM SHOWS
COVERGENCE ON “SHOULD BE”
Latin America
7
Indigenous Africa 6 Anglo
5 As Is
4
Arab 3 Nordic
2
Shd Be
1
S Asia Germanic
Confucian Latin Europe
East Europe
8 Cross-Cultural Management
9. GLOBE RESPONSES ON HUMANE
ORIENTATION ALSO SHOWS
COVERGENCE ON “SHOULD BE”
Latin America
7
Indigenous Africa 6 Anglo
5
4 As Is
Arab 3 Nordic
2
1
Shd Be
S Asia Germanic
Confucian Latin Europe
East Europe
9 Cross-Cultural Management
10. QUESTIONS OF GLOBAL AND
LOCAL CULTURES
• Will global culture replace or exist with local
cultures?
• Will global culture bring positive or negative
outcomes?
10 Cross-Cultural Management
12. Group
Two or more interacting individuals who
come together to achieve some
objectives.
Groups can be either formal or informal,
and further subclassified into command,
task, interest, or friendship categories.
12 Cross-Cultural Management
13. Team
A specific type of group where an
emphasis is put on some level of
member interdependence and on
achievement of common goals
•All teams are groups
•Some groups are just people assembled together
•Teams have task interdependence whereas some
groups do not (e.g., group of employees enjoying
lunch together)
13 Cross-Cultural Management
14. Reasons for Team Popularity
• Outperform individuals on tasks requiring
multiple skills, judgment, and experience
• Better utilization of employee talents
• More flexible and responsive to changing events
• Facilitate employee participation in operating
decisions
• Effective in democratizing the organization and
increasing employee involvement and motivation
14 Cross-Cultural Management
15. Basic Group Concepts
Group Roles Group Norms
Expected Patterns of Acceptable Standards
Behavior Based on a of Behavior Shared
Given Position in a by the Members
Social Unit of a Group
15 Cross-Cultural Management
16. Cohesiveness
Social-Oriented Cohesiveness: The degree to
which members of the group are attracted to
each other and motivated to stay in the group
Task-Oriented Cohesiveness: The degree to
which group members work together,
cooperate and coordinate their activity in
order to achieve group goals
16 Cross-Cultural Management
17. Team Effectiveness Model
Organizational and Team
Team Design
Team Environment Effectiveness
• Reward systems •Task characteristics
•Team size • Achieve
• Communication
organizational
systems •Team composition
goals
• Physical space
• Satisfy member
• Organizational needs
Team Processes
environment
• Maintain team
• Organizational •Team development survival
structure •Team norms
• Organizational •Team roles
leadership •Team cohesiveness
17 Cross-Cultural Management
18. Groups Across Cultures
Two cultural dimensions are especially relevant:
• Individualism-Collectivism
• Power Distance
• Also Uncertainty Avoidance; e.g., potential for
Role Conflict (esp. in multi-functional teams)
18 Cross-Cultural Management
19. The Challenge in
Shaping Team Players
Greatest where... Less demanding...
– The national culture –Where employees have
is highly strong collectivist values,
individualistic such as Japan or
– Introduced into Mexico
organizations that –In new organizations
historically value that use teams as their
individual initial form for structuring
achievement work
19 Cross-Cultural Management
20. Cross-Cultural Differences
Cross–cultural differences in intergroup processes
– Collectivistic cultures
• Expect little expression of conflict; favor
suppressing conflict
• Prefer to personalize interaction; focus
on people, despite what group they
represent
• Group membership is an important part
of identity and interaction
20 Cross-Cultural Management
21. Power Distance and SDWTs
Nicholls et al. (1999) study of SDWT in Mexico:
• Why are teams failing in a highly collectivist culture
such as Mexico?
• Major challenges in implementing SDWTs
• Workers expect to exercise little control over work
and not to be involved in decision making
• Expect clear instructions from the top and are not
highly motivated by opportunity to initiate and take
larger responsibility
• Can SDWT work in high-PD cultures? How?
21 Cross-Cultural Management
22. Interpersonal Relationships
• Individualists tend to have more friends, but with
lesser intensity level;
• Collectivists tend to have less friends, but with
higher intensity level.
• Individualists are less suspicious towards out-
group members and easier to make initial contact;
• Collectivists have stronger bonds with in-group
members
22 Cross-Cultural Management
23. Differential Group Processes
• Conformity: who is more conforming?
• Formal/regulated participation vs. spontaneous
• Social loafing versus social striving
• Preferences for group vs. individual rewards
• Equality (‘you deserve what you get’) vs. Equity
(‘you get what you deserve’) vs. Need based
decisions (‘to all according to their needs’)
23 Cross-Cultural Management
24. Conformity
• Cross–cultural variations in tendency to accept
group pressure for conformity to group norms
– Japanese encourage high conformity to
norms of a group that has the person's
primary loyalty
– German students (in some experimental
research) showed a lower tendency to
conform
– Moderate conformity among people in
Hong Kong, Brazil, Lebanon, and the
United States
24 Cross-Cultural Management
25. Teams’ Cultural Composition
•Cultural Diversity: the number of different cultures
represented in the group;
•Cultural Norms: the orientations of the specific
cultures represented in the group toward group
dynamics and processes; and
•Relative Cultural Distance: the extent to which
group members are culturally different from each
other
25 Cross-Cultural Management
26. Surface and Deep Diversity
In multicultural teams, diversity can be in the
form of:
• Surface-level (black-American; Caucasian-
American; French and Vietnamese) and/or
• Deep-level (Irish and English; Singaporean
and Chinese; N. and S. Africans)
26 Cross-Cultural Management
27. Dynamics of Team Diversity
Social Context
Org. Context
Group
Dynamics
Affective Team Long-term
Diversity
Reactions Behaviours Conseq.
•Surface
•Cohesion •Communication •Performance
•Deep
•Satisfaction •Conflict •Promotion
•Commitment •Cooperation •Turnover
27 Cross-Cultural Management
28. Jackson, Joshi & Erhardt (2003)
• Surface-level diversity has more immediate
impact and is influential in early-stage/newly
formed teams while deep-level becomes more
important over time and its effects last longer.
• Diversity, in general, and cultural/ethnic diversity
in particular, have mixed effects on team
processes and performance;
• Less effect on simpler, motor-based tasks; more
effect on complex, interdependent teamwork
28 Cross-Cultural Management
29. Earley & Mosakowski (2000)
• Studied effects of heterogeneity in transnational
teams using experimental and field settings
• Reasoned that the effects of national
heterogeneity on team performance is non-linear;
• Found that in the early stages, homogenous
teams (those with only one major national group
identity) outperformed both moderately
heterogeneous (groups with two different sub-
group identities) and highly heterogeneous (no
clear sub-group identities exist) teams.
29 Cross-Cultural Management
30. Earley & Mosakowski (2000)
• In the longer term, high-heterogeneous teams’
performance increased as they managed to create a
hybrid-culture;
• Such hybrid culture was not created in moderately
heterogeneous teams, whose performance was
lower than both high and low heterogeneity teams.
Team processes mediated the effects of heterogeneity
on team performance, such that:
• In homogenous groups, members perceived many
similarities between themselves (remember SIT?);
trust, shared mental models and open
communication developed early on in the team’s life
30 Cross-Cultural Management
31. Earley & Mosakowski (2000)
• In moderately heterogeneous teams, a dynamic of
‘us vs. them’ prevailed, with the two sub-groups
sticking to themselves in times of conflict, resulting
in little cross sub-group cooperation;
• In highly heterogeneous teams, as time passed,
members go to know each other better and since
there were no dominant sub-groups, they were free
to form a ‘hybrid culture’-unique to their team and
overarching each members’ national identity.
• Implications for joint ventures and projects where
two cultures (national or organizational) get together
to try to create a cooperative structure
31 Cross-Cultural Management
32. Diversity and Teams
• Overall, diversity causes process losses
• Can be beneficial if team overcomes these
losses over time
• Depends on organizational culture and top-
management support
• Highly heterogeneous and highly homogenous
teams work better than mid-range ones
• Fault lines in teams lead to rivalry coalitions =>
decrease effectiveness
32 Cross-Cultural Management
33. Conditions for Effectiveness
More Effective Less Effective
Task Innovative Routine
Stage Divergence (earlier) Convergence (later)
Conditions Differences Recognized Differences Ignore
Task-based member Culture-base members
selection selection
Pluralism Ethnocentrism
Equal Power Cultural Dominance
Superordinate goals Individual goals
External feedback No feedback/autonomy
33 Cross-Cultural Management
34. Some Implications
• Investment in diverse teams is more sensible for
the longer-term, for complex tasks and when
team members are (relatively) pluralistic
• More careful task design is needed
• Positive feedback, early on
• Preparation and training, through conceptual and
experiential approaches is recommended
• Strive to create a third culture through
superordinate goals and neutralization of
differences
34 Cross-Cultural Management
35. Diversity: Beyond the Obvious
• Seemingly culturally similar team members may
have the hardest time to get along: need to take
into account other variables besides culture
(history, class)
• Idiosyncratic cultural variables, e.g., intellectual
style (Russians vs. N. Americans)
• Prior experience with different cultures plays
important role (usually for the better)
• Virtual Teams: added complexity
35 Cross-Cultural Management
37. Introduction to Motivation
Motivation
Psychological process through which
unsatisfied wants or needs lead to drives
that are aimed at goals or incentives
The Basic Motivation Process
Unsatisfied Drive toward goal to Attainment of goal
need satisfy need (need satisfaction)
37 Cross-Cultural Management
38. Introduction to Motivation
• Need Theories
• Cognitive theories
– Expectancy theory: describes internal processes
of choice among different behaviors
– Equity theory: describes how and why people
react when they feel unfairly treated
– Goal setting theory: focuses on how to set goals
for people to reach
• Behavioral theory
– Behavior modification: focuses on observable
behavior, not internal psychological processes
38 Cross-Cultural Management
39. Basic Assumptions
• The Universalist Assumption
– All people are motivated to pursue goals they
value
– Specific content of the goals that are pursued
will be influenced by culture
– Movement toward market economies may make
motivation more similar in different countries
39 Cross-Cultural Management
40. Motivation Theories
Are Culture Bound
Hierarchy Need for
of Needs Achievement
Goal-Setting
Theory
40 Cross-Cultural Management
41. Attitudes and Personality
• Personality characteristics
– People in individualistic cultures (United
States) have stronger need for autonomy than
people in group–oriented cultures (Japan)
– People in cultures that emphasize avoiding
uncertainty (Belgium, Peru) have stronger
need for security than people in cultures that
are less concerned about avoiding uncertainty
(Singapore, Ireland)
41 Cross-Cultural Management
42. Need Theories of Motivation
• Concept of needs holds across cultures
• People from different cultures may express and
satisfy needs differently
• Importance of needs in Maslow's need hierarchy
– United States: self–actualization
– Latin America: security, affiliation
– France and Germany: need for security
– New Zealand: belongingness and love
• McClelland: needs for affiliation, power and
achievement
42 Cross-Cultural Management
43. International Aspects of
Job Design
• Herzberg: Two Factor Theory
• Individual and group–based job design
– U.S. managers have mostly used individual
approaches to job design
– Recent shifts to group–based approaches
– Managers in other industrialized countries have
mainly emphasized group–based job design
43 Cross-Cultural Management
44. Job Design (Cont.)
• Changing specific job characteristics
– Belgium, Mexico, Greece, Thailand: not
likely to accept efforts to increase
autonomy and task identity
– French managers particularly dislike
recommendations to decentralize decision
authority. Subordinates do not expect
them to do so
– Quality circles: big success in Japan, but
only partial in the US
44 Cross-Cultural Management
45. Cognitive and Behavioral Theories
of Motivation
• Two assumptions that could restrict use of
these theories outside the U.S.
– Individual controls decisions about future
actions
– Manager can deliberately shape the
behavior of people
45 Cross-Cultural Management
46. Cognitive and Behavioral Theories
of Motivation
• Both assumptions reflect U.S. values of free will,
individualism, individual control
• Cultural contrasts
– Muslim managers believe something happens
mainly because God wills it to happen
– Hong Kong Chinese believe luck plays a role
in all events
46 Cross-Cultural Management
47. Cognitive and Behavioral Theories
• Expectancy theory's validity in other cultures
– Japanese female life insurance sales
representatives responded to commission
system as expected
– Russian textile workers
• Linked valued extrinsic rewards to worker
performance
• Productivity increased as the theory predicts
• Generally, expectancy theory best explains
motivation of people in cultures that emphasize
internal attribution
47 Cross-Cultural Management
48. Cognitive and Behavioral Theories (Cont.)
• Equity theory: complex cross–cultural effects
– Reward allocation decisions followed equity
theory premises in U.S., Russian, and
Chinese samples
– Other studies
• Chinese emphasized seniority in their
reward decisions more than Americans.
• Eastern European transition economies:
endorsed positive inequity more than
American students
48 Cross-Cultural Management
49. Culture & Motivation
• Research on goal setting theory in several
countries
• Results consistent with U.S. work that
formulated the theory
• Some cultural differences
– U.S. students not affected by how goals were
set
– Israeli students performed better when goals
were set participatively; consistent with
culture of cooperation
49 Cross-Cultural Management
50. Idiosyncratic Factors
Beyond cultures’ variance along the major cultural
value dimensions, there are specific aspects
anchored in nation’s history and expressed
through its symbols and language.
Ignoring such factors may
render motivational
techniques ineffective or
even result in de-motivation;
e.g.:
Slay the Dragon!!
50 Cross-Cultural Management
52. Decision Making
Process of choosing a course of action among
alternatives
52 Cross-Cultural Management
53. Various Factors
* Time Orientation
• Deciding for the short/long term?
• How long to make a decision?
• Polichronic or monochronic style?
* Who decides: Groups vs. Individuals
* Voting vs. Consensus based decisions
* Process: Participative vs. Autocratic
53 Cross-Cultural Management
54. Value of Rationality
Strong preference for rational D.M. vs.
Occasional or low value on rationality;
In some cultures more emphasis on:
• Emotions
• Religion
• Ideology
54 Cross-Cultural Management
55. Rational Decision Making
The Rational Approach assumes that
– Managers follow a systematic, step-by-step
process.
– Organization is economically based and is
managed by decision makers who are entirely
objective and have complete information.
It assumes that rational choices are:
• Consistent
• Value-maximizing
• Within specified constraints
55 Cross-Cultural Management
56. The Six-Step Rational
Decision-Making Model
1. Define the problem
2. Identify decision criteria
3. Weight the criteria
4. Generate alternatives
5. Rate each alternative on each criterion
6. Compute the optimal decision
56 Cross-Cultural Management
57. Cultural Contingencies in Decision Making
Step
1. Problem Problem solving; change Situation acceptance
Recognition
2. Information Search Gathering facts Gathering ideas and
possibilities
3. Construction of New, future oriented Past/present/future
Alternatives based on change based on stability
4. Choice Individual level; Group level; by senior
delegation of management; slowly
responsibility; fast
5. Implementation Slow; top-down Fast; broad participation
57 Cross-Cultural Management
58. Case Study: The Road to Hell (p. 512)
• What mistakes did John Baker Made? Why did
he not realize his mistake when it occurred?
• What would you recommend that Baker do
now?
• What do you learn from this case about human
resource management across different
nations?
58 Cross-Cultural Management
59. Stages of Moral Development
Stage
Level Description
6. Following self-chosen ethical
principles, even if they
Principled violate the law
5. Valuing rights of others;
upholding non-relative
values and rights regardless
of the majority’s opinion
4. Maintaining conventional order by
Conventional fulfilling obligations to which
you have agreed
3. Living up to what is expected by
people close to you
2. Following rules only when it’s in your
immediate interest
Pre-conventional
1. Sticking to rules to avoid physical
punishment
Adapted from L. Kohlberg, “Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive-Developmental approach,” pages 34-55 in
Moral Develop and Behavior: Theory, Research, and Social Issues, ed. T. Lickona (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1976).
59 Cross-Cultural Management
60. Three Different Criteria in Making
Ethical Choices
• Utilitarian Criterion - made solely on basis of
outcomes or consequences
• Focus on Rights - made consistently with
fundamental liberties and privileges
• Focus on Justice - requires imposing and
enforcing rules fairly and impartially for equitable
distribution of benefits and costs
60 Cross-Cultural Management
61. Ethical Aspects of Decisions
• Multinational firms face many ethical questions
and issues
• Operate in many countries; subject to the laws of
those countries
• Legal and social context of globally oriented
organizations can present their managers with
ethical dilemmas
61 Cross-Cultural Management
62. Ethical Aspects of Decisions
Two ethical views
Cultural Ethical
relativism Multinational
realism
organization
62 Cross-Cultural Management
63. Ethical Aspects of Decisions
Ethical views:
• Cultural relativism
• Cultural relativism refers to differences in
ethical values among different cultures
• Premise: right and wrong should be
decided by each society's predominant
ethical values
• Cultural relativists base their argument on
three points
63 Cross-Cultural Management
64. Ethical Aspects of Decisions
- Cultural relativism (cont.)
• Three points
– Moral judgments are statements of
feelings and opinions; neither wrong nor
right
– Moral judgments are based on local
ethical systems; cannot judge right or
wrong across cultures
– Prudent approach: do not claim an action
is either right or wrong
64 Cross-Cultural Management
65. Ethical Aspects of Decisions
- Cultural relativism (cont.)
• Managers should behave according to local
ethical systems, even if behavior violates
home country ethical system
• Many philosophers reject cultural relativism's
argument that codes of ethics cannot cross
national boundaries
• Agree that countries vary in defining right
and wrong
65 Cross-Cultural Management
66. Ethical Aspects of Decisions
– Ethical realism
• Morality does not apply to international
transactions
• Because no power rules over international
events, people will not behave morally
• Because others will not behave morally,
one is not morally required to behave
ethically
66 Cross-Cultural Management
67. Ethical Aspects of Decisions
• International ethical dilemmas
– Goods made in a country with no child labor
laws
– Goods made in a country with child labor laws
that are not enforced
– Changing the behavior of local people
– Making small payments that are allowed under
the company’s national law
67 Cross-Cultural Management
69. Definitions
There are almost as many definitions of
leadership as there are theories…some of the
more common ones are:
• Ability to influence a group toward the
achievement of goals.
• The process whereby one individual influences
other group members towards the attainment of
defined group or organisational goals.
• The process of creating vision for others and
having the power to translate it into a reality and
sustain it.
69 Cross-Cultural Management
70. Foundation for Leadership
Leadership Behaviors and Styles
The use of work-centered behavior
Authoritarian designed to ensure task
Leadership accomplishment.
The use of work-centered behavior
Paternalistic
coupled with a protective employee
Leadership centered concern.
The use of both work- or task-
Participative centered and people centered
Leadership approaches to leading subordinates.
70 Cross-Cultural Management
71. Leader–Subordinate Interactions
Authoritarian Leader
Subordinate Subordinate Subordinate
One-way downward flow of information
and influence from authoritarian leader
to subordinates.
71 Cross-Cultural Management
72. Leader–Subordinate Interactions
Paternalistic Leader
Subordinate Subordinate Subordinate
Continual interaction and exchange of
information and influence between
leader and subordinates.
72 Cross-Cultural Management
73. Leader–Subordinate Interactions
Participative Leader
Subordinate Subordinate Subordinate
Continual interaction and exchange of
information and influence between
leader and subordinates.
73 Cross-Cultural Management
74. Contingency Theories
• Leaders use various leadership
styles/behaviours;
• Quality of leadership experience depends on
several situational factors, including followers
and task type.
• Path-Goal Model - Leader assists followers in
attaining goals and ensures goals are
compatible with overall objectives
74 Cross-Cultural Management
75. Path-Goal Theory
A theory of leadership suggesting that subordinates
will be motivated by a leader only to the extent they
perceive this individual as helping them to attain
valued goals.
75 Cross-Cultural Management
76. Path-Goal Theory
Four basic leadership styles:
• Instrumental (directive): An approach focused
on providing specific guidance and establishing
work schedules and rules.
• Supportive: A style focused on establishing
good relations with subordinates and satisfying
their needs.
• Participative: A pattern in which the leader
consults with subordinates, permitting them to
participate in decisions.
• Achievement Oriented: An approach in which
the leader sets challenging goals and seeks
improvements in performance.
76 Cross-Cultural Management
77. Path-Goal Theory
Environmental contingency factors
• Task structure
• Formal authority system
• Work group
Leader behavior
• Directive Outcomes
• Supportive • Performance
• Participative • Satisfaction
• Achievement oriented
Subordinate contingency factors
• Locus of control
• Experience
• Perceived ability
77 Cross-Cultural Management
78. Leadership
Core values of country’s culture often define type of
leadership behavior that is acceptable
– In high PD, an emphasis on hierarchical
relationships—directive approaches accepted;
Hong Kong, Latin American countries; Russia
– In low PD, hierarchical relationships are not
valued —supportive (or participative)
approaches accepted; Austria, Scandinavia,
Israel
78 Cross-Cultural Management
79. Leadership
Individualism-Collectivism
• Leader as a paternal figure vs. leader as an expert
• Degree to which intervention of leader in follower’s
private lives is expected and accepted
Masculine/Feminine
• Acceptance of women as leaders
• Accepted style for leaders
Long-Term-Orientation
• Elect leaders for four years…or forty?
Leader’s style: first among equals (China) or class of
its own (Arab Countries)
79 Cross-Cultural Management
80. GLOBE Project
• Multi-country study and evaluation of cultural
attributes and leadership behavior
• Are transformational characteristics of
leadership universally endorsed?
• 170 country co-investigators
• 65 different cultures
• 17,500 middle managers
• 800 organizations
80 Cross-Cultural Management
81. GLOBE Project
• Which traits are universally viewed as
impediments to leadership effectiveness?
• Based on beliefs that
– Certain attributes that distinguish one culture from
others can be used to predict the most suitable,
effective and acceptable organizational and leader
practices within that culture
– Societal culture has direct impact on organizational
culture
– Leader acceptance stems from tying leader
attributes and behaviors to subordinate norms
81 Cross-Cultural Management
82. GLOBE Cultural Variable Results
Variable Highest Medium Lowest
Ranking Ranking Ranking
Assertiveness Spain, U.S. Egypt, IrelandSweden, New
Zealand
Future orientation Denmark, CanadaSlovenia, Egypt Russia, Argentina
Gender differentiation South Korea, Italy, Brazil Sweden Denmark
Egypt
Uncertainty avoidance Austria, Denmark Israel, U.S. Russia, Hungary
Power distance Russia, Spain England, France Demark, Netherlands
Collectivism/Societal Denmark, Hong Kong, U.S. Greece, Hungary
Singapore
In-group collectivism Egypt, China England, France Denmark,
Netherlands
Performance orientation U.S., Taiwan Sweden, Israel Russia, Argentina
Humane orientation Indonesia, Egypt Hong Kong, Germany, Spain
Sweden
82 Cross-Cultural Management
84. Leadership and Management
Need to bear in mind that leadership style is very
much situation dependent: for example, in some
situations (e.g., emergency) and in some
organizational cultures, directive style will be
accepted even in a country like the US;
Participation is more likely if the basis of power is
more achievement based (instrumental) than if it
is ascribed (personal) and
Degree of participation in decision making and
leadership by subordinates vary cross-nationally
84 Cross-Cultural Management
85. Leadership in the
International Context
Attitudes of European European managers tend to use a
participative approach.
Managers Toward Researchers investigated four
Leadership Practices areas relevant to leadership.
Does the leader believe that employees
Capacity for Leadership
prefer to be directed and have little
and Initiative ambition? (Theory X) OR
Does the leader believe that
characteristics such as initiative can be
acquired by most people regardless of
their inborn traits and abilities? (Theory Y)
85 Cross-Cultural Management
86. Leadership in the
International Context
Attitudes of European Most evidence indicates European
managers tend to use a participative
Managers Toward approach. Researchers investigated
Leadership Practices four areas relevant to leadership.
Capacity for Leadership Does the leader believe that detailed,
complete instructions should be given to
and Initiative subordinates and that subordinates need
only this information to do their jobs?
Sharing Information OR
Does the leader believe that general
and Objectives directions are sufficient and that
subordinates can use their initiative in
working out the details?
86 Cross-Cultural Management
87. Leadership in the
International Context
Attitudes of European Most evidence indicates European
managers tend to use a participative
Managers Toward approach. Researchers investigated
Leadership Practices four areas relevant to leadership.
Does the leader support participative
Capacity for Leadership leadership practices?
and Initiative
Sharing Information
and Objectives
Participation
87 Cross-Cultural Management
88. Leadership in the
International Context
Attitudes of European Most evidence indicates European
managers tend to use a participative
Managers Toward approach. Researchers investigated
Leadership Practices four areas relevant to leadership.
Capacity for Leadership Does the leader believe that the
and Initiative most effective way to control
employees is through rewards
Sharing Information
and punishment?
and Objectives OR
Does the leader believe that
Participation employees respond best to
internally generated control?
Internal Control
88 Cross-Cultural Management
89. Japanese vs. U.S.
Leadership Styles
Dimension Japan US
Employment Often for life Often short-term
Evaluation Slow, takes many years Fast: those not promoted
often leave
Career Paths Very general; based on v. specialised; people stay
rotations in one area
Dec. Making Group based By individual managers
Control Mech. Implicit & informal; Explicit; based on
reliance on trust and knowing the control
goodwill mechanisms
Responsibility Shared collectively Assigned individually
Concern for Broad and covers the limited to work-life
employees whole life
89 Cross-Cultural Management
92. Leadership-Other Issues
• Emphasis on Emotional Intelligence is
especially important for leading cross-
culturally
• Idiosyncratic effects & paradoxes:
– Moderately masculine Muslim and Hindu
nations with traditional views on women…
but,
– Israel, India, Pakistan and other exceptions
• Charismatic leadership is not universally
accepted
92 Cross-Cultural Management
94. HR Challenges of International
Business
Researchers asked “What are the key global pressures
affecting human resource management practices in your
firm currently and for the projected future?” Responses
were:
• Deployment
• Knowledge and innovation
dissemination
• Identifying and developing talent
globally
94 Cross-Cultural Management
95. Global Staffing
Pressures
– Candidate selections
– Assignment terms
– Relocation
– Immigration
– Culture and language
– Compensation
– Tax administration
– Handling spouse and dependent matters
95 Cross-Cultural Management
96. Economic Differences
Translate into differences in HR practices:
• Espousing ideals of free enterprise
• Wage costs vary
• Other labor costs vary: severance pay; holidays
96 Cross-Cultural Management
97. International Labor Relations
Union membership varies widely worldwide
29%
80%
24%
39%
44%
14%
39% 23%
97 Cross-Cultural Management
98. International Staffing
Multinational corporations (MNC’s) use
several types of international managers:
– Locals
– Expatriates
• Home-country nationals
• Third-country nationals
98 Cross-Cultural Management
99. Sources of Human
Resources
Home Country Nationals
– Expatriate managers who are citizens of the
country where the MNC is headquartered
• Expatriates
– Those who live and work away from their home country
– Citizens of the country where the MNC is headquartered
• Expatriates are useful for:
– starting up operations
– providing technical expertise
– helping the MNC maintain financial control over the operation
• Expatriates almost always were men
– Situation is changing
• Expatriates typically used in top management
positions
99 Cross-Cultural Management
100. Sources of Human Resources
• Host-Country Nationals
– Local managers who are hired by the MNC
– Used in middle- and lower-level
management positions
– Nativization
• Requirement of host-country
government that mandates employment
of host-country nationals
100 Cross-Cultural Management
101. Sources of Human
Resources
• Third-Country Nationals (TCNs)
– Citizens of countries other than the one in
which the MNC is headquartered or the
one in which the managers are assigned to
work by the MNC
– Found in MNCs that have progressed
through the initial and middle stages of
internationalization
101 Cross-Cultural Management
102. Sources of Human Resources
– Advantages of using TCNs
• Require less compensation
• Good working knowledge of the region
• Given home office experience, often can
achieve objectives better than other types
of managers
• Offer different perspectives
102 Cross-Cultural Management
103. Failure Rates of International Assignments
International assignment failure can cost
hundreds of thousands of euros
Europe
% Failure
Japan
US
0 20 40 60
103 Cross-Cultural Management
104. Why International
Assignments Fail
• Personality
• Person’s intentions
• Family pressures
• Lack of cultural skills
• Other non-work conditions like living and
housing conditions, and health care
104 Cross-Cultural Management
105. Improving Failure Rates/Solutions
• Provide realistic previews
• Have a careful screening process
• Improve orientation
• Provide good benefits
• Test employees fairly
• Shorten assignment length
105 Cross-Cultural Management
106. Important Predictors
of Success
• Family situation tops the list
• Flexibility/adaptability screening was high on
results
• Use paper and pencil tests like the Overseas
Assignment Inventory
• Previewing what changes an international
assignee can expect
106 Cross-Cultural Management
107. Selecting
International Managers
• Test for traits that predict success
in adapting to new environments
Predictive trait
• Job knowledge and motivation breakdown
• Relational skills
• Flexibility and adaptability
• Extra-cultural openness
• Family situation
107 Cross-Cultural Management
108. Traits Distinguishing Successful
International Executives
SCALE SAMPLE ITEM
Sensitive to Cultural Differences When working with people from other cultures, works
hard to understand their perspectives.
Business Knowledge Has a solid understanding of our products and services.
Courage to Take a Stand Is willing to take a stand on issues.
Brings Out the Best in People Has a special talent for dealing with people.
Acts with Integrity Can be depended on to tell the truth regardless of
Is Insightful circumstances.
Is good at identifying the most important part of a
Is Committed to Success complex problem or issue.
Clearly demonstrates commitment to seeing the
Takes Risks organization succeed.
Uses Feedback Takes personal as well as business risks.
Is Culturally Adventurous Has changed as a result of feedback.
Enjoys the challenge of working in countries other than
Seeks Opportunities to Learn his/her own.
Is Open to Criticism Takes advantage of opportunities to do new things.
Seeks Feedback Appears brittle—as if criticism might cause him/her to
Is Flexible break.*
Pursues feedback even when others are reluctant to give in.
*Reverse scored Doesn’t get so invested in things that she/he cannot
change when something doesn’t work.
108 Cross-Cultural Management
109. Performance Appraisal of
International Mangers
Five suggestions for improving the expatriate appraisal process:
1. Stipulate the assignment’s difficulty level. For example,
being an expatriate
manager in China is generally considered more difficult
than working in
England, and the appraisal should take such difficulty-
level differences into
account.
2. Weight the evaluation more toward the on-site manager’s
appraisal than
toward the home-site manager’s distant perceptions of
the employee’s
performance.
109 Cross-Cultural Management
110. Performance Appraisal of
International Mangers
• 3. If however (as is usually the case), the home-site
manager does the actual
• written appraisal, have him or her use a former
expatriate from the same
• overseas location to provide background advice
during the appraisal process.
• 4. Modify the normal performance criteria used for
that particular position to
• fit the overseas position and characteristics of
that particular locale.
• 5. Attempt to give the expatriate manager credit for
his or her insights into
• the functioning of the operation and specifically
the interdependencies
• of the domestic and foreign operations.
110 Cross-Cultural Management
111. The New Workplace:
Sending Women Abroad
• In the US, only 6% filled overseas positions
compared to 49% domestic
• One survey found inaccurate stereotypes:
– Not as internationally mobile
– Might have a tougher time building teams
111 Cross-Cultural Management
112. Performance Appraisal of
International Mangers
Five suggestions for improving the expatriate appraisal process:
1. Stipulate the assignment’s difficulty level. For example,
being an expatriate
manager in China is generally considered more difficult
than working in
England, and the appraisal should take such difficulty-
level differences into
account.
2. Weight the evaluation more toward the on-site manager’s
appraisal than
toward the home-site manager’s distant perceptions of
the employee’s
performance.
112 Cross-Cultural Management
113. Performance Appraisal of
International Mangers
• 3. If however (as is usually the case), the home-site
manager does the actual
• written appraisal, have him or her use a former
expatriate from the same
• overseas location to provide background advice
during the appraisal process.
• 4. Modify the normal performance criteria used for
that particular position to
• fit the overseas position and characteristics of
that particular locale.
• 5. Attempt to give the expatriate manager credit for
his or her insights into
• the functioning of the operation and specifically
the interdependencies
• of the domestic and foreign operations.
113 Cross-Cultural Management
114. Culture Shock!
Shock!M
• Disorientation upon entering a new cultural
environment
• Normal use of own cultural filter fails
– interpretation of perceptions
– communication of intentions
• All people experience culture shock... Past
experience and training can shorten its
length
114 Cross-Cultural Management
115. Culture Shock:
Responses
– Gone native (assimilation):
accepts the new... rejects
own
– Participator (integration):
adapts to the new ... but
retains own
– Tourist (separation): avoids
the new...
– Outcast (marginalization):
won’t/can’t adapt... rejects
own...
115 Cross-Cultural Management
116. Phases
• Honeymoon
– euphoria, unrealistically positive attitudes
towards host country, stay in hotel shields
from mundane difficulties, house
hunting/school hunting exciting, sightseeing!!
• Irritation and Hostility (the crisis stage)
– problems adjusting at work, local clocks don't
fit yours, difficulties getting the routine daily
tasks done, everything stinks; some never
recover
116 Cross-Cultural Management
117. Symptoms
– homesickness
– boredom
– withdrawal (reading is an obsession, focus
on home nationals, avoid host nationals)
– excessive sleep need, compulsive eating
and drinking
– irritability
– exaggerated cleanliness
117 Cross-Cultural Management
118. Symptoms (cont.)
– marital stress, family tension, conflict
– stereotyping host nationals
– hostility towards host nationals
– loss of ability to work effectively
– fits of weeping
– psychosomatic illnesses
118 Cross-Cultural Management
119. Phases
• Gradual Adjustment
– can manage, cope with situation now
• Biculturalism/Coping
– ability to function in both cultures,
acceptance of local customs and values for
what they are (not going native), possible to
get by, positive and growth gaining
experience
119 Cross-Cultural Management
120. Nature of Culture Shock
• Not a jolt, rather a series of cumulative
experiences
• Cultural differences become focus of
attention
• Foreign ways are quaint no more... they
seem inferior to your own
120 Cross-Cultural Management
121. What Special Training Do Overseas
Candidates Need?
• Impact of cultural differences
• Understanding attitude formation
• Factual knowledge about target country
• Language and adjustment/adaptability
skills
121 Cross-Cultural Management
122. Four Step Approach to Training Overseas
Candidates
Level 1 training focuses on the impact of cultural
v
differences, and on raising trainees’ awareness of such
differences and their impact on business outcomes.
vLevel 2 training aims at getting participants to
understand how attitudes (both negative and positive)
are formed and how they influence behavior.
vLevel 3 training provides factual knowledge about the
target country.
vLevel 4 training provides skill building in areas like
language and adjustment and adaptation skills.
122 Cross-Cultural Management
123. Cross-Cultural Training
Training Training
Month Time Rigor Hig
Immersion
s Approach h
Assessment
Field experience
Simulations
Affective Sensitivity
Approach training
Week Culture assimilator Language:
training “intensive”
s Informatio Role-playing
Cases
n Giving Stress reduction
Geographic training
briefings Cultural Briefings
Cultural Briefings Language: “Moderate”
Day(s) Films/Books
Interpreters
Low
Language: Length of
“Survival”
Assignment
Weeks Months Years
123 Cross-Cultural Management
124. Repatriation of Expatriates
• Repatriation
– Return to one’s home country from an overseas
management assignment
• Reasons for returning
– Formally agreed-on tour of duty is over
– Expats want their children educated in the home
country
– Unhappiness with foreign assignment
– Failure to perform well
• Readjustment problems
– Permanent position upon return constitutes a
demotion
– Lack opportunity to use skills learned abroad upon
return
– Salary and benefits may decrease upon return
124 Cross-Cultural Management
125. Repatriation Problems
• Leaving the firm prematurely
• Mediocre or makeshift jobs
• Finding former colleagues
promoted
• Reverse culture shock
125 Cross-Cultural Management
126. Repatriation
Several steps can be taken to avoid repatriation problems:
vWrite repatriation agreements
vShorten Assignment periods
vAssign a sponsor
vProvide career counseling
vKeep communications open
vOffer financial support
vDevelop reorientation programs
vBuild in return trips
126 Cross-Cultural Management
Editor's Notes
As I mentioned earlier, people look to different groups for direction when they are confused: it is important to recognize that they look to global businesses for direction — this is a new role of business.
The Planet Project and the Roper Poll of Values Polls that report public opinion are not as rigorous as studies reported above. Nevertheless, they provide some insight about worldwide beliefs. In 2000, Minnesota Manufacturing and Mining (3M) initiated the Planet Project, an interactive Internet-based poll to which hundreds of thousands of people worldwide responded. Volunteers also conducted face-to-face interviews in 115 nations to include opinions from those who are not Internet connected. Findings thus far show that people around the world are very concerned about their self-image and with projecting a youthful appearance. A surprising finding is that the more educated a person is, the more likely a belief in God (Johnson, 2001). Roper Starch Worldwide also asked 30,000 people worldwide to rank 57 personal values in order of importance. Of the top five values overall, protecting the family was first, followed by honesty, health and fitness, self-esteem and self - reliance. Other values rated highly were freedom, stable relationships, and faith (World T rends, 2001). Faith was ranked most highly in nations that are predominately Muslim, e.g., Indonesia, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia. The World Values Survey Introduced in 1981 the World Values Survey examines the values of 65 societies (Ingelhart and Baker, 2000) or about 80 percent of the world's population. Results show that economic development has a powerful relationship with cultural values. That is, people from low-income societies differ significantly from those in high-income countries on two dimensions: traditional vs. secular-rational values and survival vs. self-expression values.
Details on the GLOBE project are in Chapter 14 . 160 social scientists and management scholars from 62 cultures representing all major regions throughout the world are engaged in this long-term programmatic series of cross-cultural leadership studies. GLOBE is a multi-method multi-phase research program designed to test a cross-level integrated theory of the relationship between culture and leadership effectiveness. They looked at 62 cultures, grouping them by similarities, e.g., Anglo (this included white S. Africa), Latin Ameican, Latin Europe (French speaking Switzerland), Southern Asia, Germanic Europe, and the Middle East. Over 17 , 000 middle managers from over 900 corporations in food processing, finance, and telecommunications industries in 62 cultures participated in GLOBE surveys. GLOBE measures both cultural practices (as is) and cultural values (should be). Project GLOBE is a multi-method multi-phase research program to test relationships between culture and leadership effectiveness. Over 160 social scientists and management scholars participate in this series of studies. By 2004, researchers had gathered information from over 17,000 middle managers from more than 900 corporations in food processing, finance, and telecommunications industries in 62 cultures. These managers answered questions according to both cultural practices (as is) and cultural values (should be). Results published in the first comprehensive report on GLOBE (House et al., 2004) reflect variations in management practices worldwide. However, when asked to indicate what “ should be, ” respondents showed convergent views. For example, on gender egalitarianism — the degree to which a collective minimizes gender inequality — managers indicated that gender inequalities should be far less than now practiced. Similarly on humane orientation — the degree to which a collective encourages and rewards individuals for being fair, altruistic, generous, caring, and kind to others — the mean score on practices was a full point lower than the mean score on what “ should be ” practiced. These results suggest that current practices among managers are divergent cross-culturally, but values may be converging. A premise to be tested in later phases of the GLOBE project is the extent to which effectiveness is a function of the interaction between leader attributes and organizational contingencies (House et al., 2002).
I believe that national cultures will endure, but that global cultures will emerge alongside them. In particular, I think there will some day be a global business culture — we see that developing now with global rules of conduct, global rules of trade (WTO), global approaches to environmental use, etc.
Groups are not unorganized; rather, they have a structure that shapes the behavior of their members. When we play a role , we engage in a set of expected behavior patterns that are attributed to occupying a given position in a social unit. Based on role research, we can conclude the following: (1) People play multiple roles. (2) People learn roles from the stimuli around them. (3) People shift roles rapidly according to situational demands. (4) People experience conflict when one role contradicts another. Acceptable standards of group behavior that are shared by the group ’ s members are called norms . When accepted by the group, norms influence the group ’ s behavior with a minimum of external controls. Groups will exert pressure upon members to bring their behavior into conformity with the standards of the group. Since members desire acceptance by the group, they are susceptible to these conformity pressures. Solomon Asch ’ s classic study demonstrated the following: People desire to be one of the group and to avoid being different, so they feel pressure to conform.
Most theories of motivation were developed in the United States by Americans and about Americans. Maslow ’ s hierarchy of needs argues that people start at the physiological level and move up the hierarchy in this order: physiological, safety, social, esteem, and self-actualization. This hierarchy aligns with American culture. In cultures where uncertainty avoidance characteristics are strong, security needs would be on top of the hierarchy. In cultures that score high on quality-of-life needs, social needs would be on top. The view that high achievement acts as an internal motivator presupposes two cultural characteristics: a willingness to accept a moderate degree of risk and a concern with performance. This combination is prevalent in Anglo American countries. Yet these characteristics are relatively absent in countries such as Chile or Portugal. Goal-setting theory is also culture bound. Its key components align reasonably well with U.S. culture. It assumes that subordinates will be reasonably independent, that managers and subordinates will seek challenging goals, and that performance is considered important by both. Goal-setting theory is not likely to increase motivation in countries in which the opposite conditions exist, such as Chile, France, and Portugal.
Page 465 Deployment: Easily getting right skills where needed regardless of geographic location. Knowledge and innovation dissemination : Spreading state-of-the-art knowledge and practices throughout the organization regardless of where they originate. Identifying and developing talent on a global basis : Identifying who can function effectively in a global organization and developing his or her abilities .
Page 466 Dealing with global staffing pressures like these is quite complex. For example, it involves addressing, on a global basis, activities including candidate selections, assignment terms and documentation; relocation processing and vendor management; immigration processing; cultural and language orientation and training; compensation administration and payroll processing; tax administration; career planning and development; and handling of spouse and dependent matters.
Page 467 Shown are hourly wages for production workers (converted into US dollars). There are other labor costs to consider. For example, there are wide gaps in hours worked. Portuguese workers average about 1,980 hours of work annually, while German workers average 1,648 hours. Several European countries, including the United Kingdom and Germany, require substantial severance pay to departing employees, usually equal to at least two years’ service in the United Kingdom and one year’s in Germany.19 Compared to the usual two or three weeks of U.S. vacation, workers in France can expect two days of paid holiday per full month of service per year, Italians usually get between four and six weeks off per year, and Germans get 18 working days per year after six months of service.
Page 477 Firms opening subsidiaries abroad will find substantial differences in labor relations practices among the world’s countries and regions. This is important; remember that while union membership as a percentage of wage and salary earners is dropping in the U.S., it is still relatively high in most countries compared with the United States’ 14%: for example, Brazil, 44%; Argentina, 39%; Germany, 29%; Denmark, 80%; Japan, 24%; Egypt, 39%; and Israel, 23%.
Page 469 Locals are citizens of the countries in which they work. Expatriates are non-citizens of the countries in which they ’ re working. Home-country nationals are citizens of the country in which the multinational corporation has its headquarters. Third-country nationals are citizens of a country other than the parent or host country; e.g., a British executive in the Tokyo branch of a US multinational bank.
Page 468 Shown are the maximum failures of a country or region for international assignments International assignments are the heart of international HR, and it ’ s therefore disconcerting to see how often such assignments fail. U.S. expatriates ’ assignments that end early (the failure rate) range from 16% to 50%, and the direct costs of each such failure can reach hundreds of thousands of dollars or more. European and Japanese multinationals reported lower failure rates, with only about one-sixth of Japanese multinationals and 3% of European multinationals reporting more than a 10% expatriate recall rate.
Page 469 Discovering why such assignments fail is therefore an important research task, and experts have made considerable progress. Personality is one factor. For example, in a study of 143 expatriate employees, extroverted, agreeable, and emotionally stable individuals were less likely to want to leave early. And the person ’ s intentions are important: For example, people who want expatriate careers try harder to adjust to such a life. Non-work factors like family pressures usually loom large in expatriate failures: In one study, U.S. managers listed, in descending order of importance for leaving early: inability of spouse to adjust, managers ’ inability to adjust, other family problems, managers ’ personal or emotional immaturity, and inability to cope with larger overseas responsibility. Managers of European firms emphasized only the inability of the manager ’ s spouse to adjust as an explanation for the expatriate ’ s failed assignment. Other studies similarly emphasize dissatisfied spouses ’ effects on the international assignment. One expert said: The selection process is fundamentally flawed. . . . Expatriate assignments rarely fail because the person cannot accommodate to the technical demands of the job. The expatriate selections are made by line managers based on technical competence. They fail because of family and personal issues and lack of cultural skills that haven ’ t been part of the process.
Page 469 Failure rates have dropped 9% over the last 10 years by stressing the items listed.
Page 472 Many firms also use paper-and-pencil tests such as the Overseas Assignment Inventory. Based on 12 years of research with more than 7,000 candidates, the test reportedly identifies the characteristics and attitudes international assignment candidates should have. Realistic previews about the problems to expect in the new job (such as mandatory private schooling for the children) as well as about the cultural benefits, problems, and idiosyncrasies of the country are another important part of the screening process. The rule, say some experts, should always be to “spell it all out” ahead of time, as many multinationals do for their international transferees.
Page 472 Selecting managers for these assignments therefore sometimes means testing them for traits that predict success in adapting to new environments. One study asked 338 international assignees from various countries and organizations to specify which traits were important for the success of managers on foreign assignment. The researchers identified five factors that contribute to success in such assignments: job knowledge and motivation, relational skills, flexibility/adaptability, extra-cultural openness, and family situation (spouse’s positive opinion, willingness of spouse to live a broad, and so on; the figure shows some of the specific items that make up each of the five factors).
Page 473 While the number and proportion of women managers working domestically has climbed in the past few years, the same isn’t true of those assigned abroad. Women filled only about 6% of the overseas international management positions at major companies, according to one estimate, compared with about 49% of domestic U.S. management positions. Women comprise only about 13% of the total expatriate population, according to another survey. Inaccurate stereotypes may account for much of this discrepancy. For example, a new survey (“Passport to Opportunity: U.S. Women in Global Business”) found that respondents believed women aren’t as internationally mobile as men; yet 80% of female expatriates say they’ve never turned down a relocation assignment, compared with 71% of men. Another myth is that women might have a tougher time building relationships with businesspeople overseas; yet 77% of U.S. women in this survey said they were effective at building business relationships with men abroad. Sending Women Managers Abroad
Page 474 Level 1 training focuses on the impact of cultural differences, and on raising trainees ’ awareness of such differences and their impact on business outcomes. Level 2 aims at getting participants to understand how attitudes (both negative and positive) are formed and how they influence behavior. (For example, unfavorable stereotypes may subconsciously influence how a new manager responds to and treats his or her new foreign subordinates.) Level 3 training provides factual knowledge about the target country, while Level 4 provides skill building in areas like language and adjustment and adaptation skills.
Page 480 Effectively repatriating returning employees is important. Particularly after companies spend hundreds of thousands of dollars helping the person develop international expertise, it ’ s disconcerting to know that perhaps 50% of returnees leave their companies within two years of coming home. expatriates often fear they ’ re “ out of sight, out of mind ” during an extended foreign stay, and such fears are often well founded. Many firms hurriedly assign returning expatriates to mediocre or makeshift jobs. Perhaps more exasperating is discovering that the firm has promoted the expatriate ’ s former colleagues while he or she was overseas. Even the expatriate ’ s family may undergo a sort of reverse culture shock, as they face the task of picking up old friendships and starting new schools, and giving up the perks of the over overseas job, like a company car and driver. Consider one employee ’ s plight. After a 5-year work assignment overseas that entailed much responsibility and a dynamic environment, Scott Fedje returned home to a cubicle, an intellectually non stimulating project, and a whole month to make a single decision. He resigned a few months later.