SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 32
High Pressure and efficient Boilers for Cogeneration applications ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
The Major advantage of Co- Gen power is ;- ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
CO-GENERATION in SUGAR MILLS
How Cogeneration Saves Energy
COGENERATION PLANT LAYOUT Feed water PRDS BOILER ALTERNATOR TURBINE TO PROCESS TO PROCESS Fuel Air TO POWER SUPPLY CONDENSER TO COOLING TOWER
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Benefits of cogeneration
Steps for conservation 1.Government of India enforced the energy conservation act 2001 with effect from 1.3.2002. 2.The initial phase of 5 years would be implementation of the act .  3.The act provides mainly for efficient use of energy and its conservation. 4.Industry using
Mandatory Requirement of Act ,[object Object],[object Object]
Energy Saving potential areas in sugar industries 1.Convertion from low Pressure to HP  Boilers 2.Steam Boilers (Reducing moisture percentage  in Bagasse) 3.Crushing section 4.Evaporator section
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],FEASIBILITY STUDY (TYPICAL STEPS)
CASE STUDIES ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
RETROFITTING ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Case Studies ,[object Object]
Comparison of performance during various seasns from 1998 to 2002 40.7 4.84 7.06 11.9 11.9 8.96 11.23 10.3 7.06 % Lost % on Available Hours 14 53.7 59.3 51.08 110 51-05 110-25 109-25 97-15 97-10 Hrs-Mts   General Cleaning 13 94.3 66 4 70 70-00 24-25 4.-00 53-55 11.-10 Hrs-Mts   Electrical 12 97.5 176 4.5 181 180-45 24-55 4.-30 59-30 64-35 Hrs-Mts   Mechanical 11         204-10 154-55 142-15 57-50 6.-00 Hrs-Mts   No Cane 10 Rs 51.57 lakhs per season                     DOWN TIME ANALYSIS   4.19 1.08 24.68 25.8     25.18 25.46 24.68 KWH   Power / Ton of Cane 9         49.74 49.45 48.75 50.71 48.76 %   Steam % Cane 8 2.32 1.19 50.11 51.3 51.3 50.4 50.11 50.56 50.66 %   Bagasse Moisture 7         8.187 9.23 9.758 9.11 9.51 %   Recovery 6         3918.42 4247.98 4063.22 3857 4217.33 MT   Crop Day Average 5         4614.77 4783.32 4576.34 4311.12 4541.39 MT   Crushing Rate/24 hours 4         4230.29 4385.11 4194.98 3951 4162.95 MT   Crushing Rate/22 hours 3         188 165 159 191 173     No. of Crop Days 2         736663 700916 646051 736838 729598 MT   Cane Crushed 1         Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual UOM   PARTICULARS SL NO. % Saving scope Diff Min Max 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03      
Coomparison of performance with best two seasons       6173-40 3816-33 4148-39 HRS Total Available Hours 15         80-120 90to130 % Sugar quality ICUMSA 14       1.73 1.78 1.86 % Pol % Bagasse 13       50.52 50.11 50.66 % Bagasse Moisture 12           78.18 % Cane Preparatory Index 11       31.22 30.32 29.56 % Bagasse % Cane 10       4.415 4.449 4.52 % Molasses % Cane 9       0.037 0.049 0.1 % d)Unknown Loss         0.99 1.211 1.27 % c)Final Molasses         0.05 0.07 0.08 % b)Filter Cake         0.54 0.541 0.55 % a)Bagasse         1.617 1.871 2 % Total Losses 8       10.963 11.618 11.5 % Pol in Cane 7       9.357 9.758 9.51 %   Recovery 6       2796.416 4063.216 4217.3 MT Crop Day Average 5       3076.152 4576.344 4541.4 MT Crushing Rate / 24 hours 4       2819.806 4149.982 4162.9 MT Crushing Rate / 22 hours 3       258 159 173   No. of Crop Days 2       721475.5 646051.4 729598 MT Cane Crushed 1                           2500 5000 5000 MT Plant Sanctioned Capacity                       %saving scope Min  Max 1994-95 2000-01 2002-03 UOM   PARTICULAR SL NO
  Possible increased in crushing of cane per season= 24220 MT/season   Remarks:Possible saving of running hours =128 hours     128 hours 213.8 341.8                     694.65 1477.49 2325 Qtls   Process Stock-Brown Sugar 30       8.82 11.23 7.06 %   Lost % on Avaible Hours 29 33.17 112.166 167.83 168-45 167-50 112-10 HRS   Others 28 11.2 97.16 109.416 164-00 109-25 97-10 HRS   General Cleaning 27       5.-30 4.-00 11.-10 HRS   Electrical 26 93 4.5 64.58 152-15 4.-30 64-35 HRS   Mechanical 25       54-15 142-15 6.-00 HRS   No Cane 24                 DOWN TIME ANALYSIS         9.83 9.923 9.68 % Peak Period Recovery 23 Rs 21.62 lakhs/season       25.18 24.68 KWH Power / Ton of Cane 22 2.77 47.41 48.76 47.41 48.75 48.76 % Steam % Cane 21       93.43 91.66 91.27 % Reduced B.House Extraction 20       95.89 96.02 95.73 % Reduced Mill Extraction 19       3.69 3.78 4.12   Milling Loss 18       295.62 293.58 259.14 % Imbibition% Fiber 17       544-45 428-25 292-55 HRS Down Time Hours 16
      75-45 10.-20 21-35 12.-40 20-45 5.-55 5.-00 0-00 HRs b)Engineering(Mech&Elec)         6.-00 0-00 0-00 0-00 0-00 0-00 6.-00 0-00 HRs a)Want of Cane         292-55 19-35 51-50 43-45 38-15 35-25 102-20 1.-45 HRs Stoppage Hours 8       3855-44 172-28 692-10 676-15 705-45 636-35 641-40 330-51 HRs Total Working Hours 7       4148-39 192-03 744-00 720-00 744-00 672-00 744-00 332-36 HRs Total Available Hours 6       167 8 31 29 31 27 27 14 Days Season Days-Crushing Day 5       173 8 31 30 31 28 31 14 Days Season Days-Crop Day 4       696220 25397 114975 13123.3 14747 13227.5 113875 3100 Qtls Sugar Production 3       9.61 6.68 8.75 10.14 10.66 10.06 8.84 8.05 %   Recovery 2       729598 21860 128072.4 127097 140288 134980 128742 48558.3 MT Cane Crushed 1                               %saving Min Max TOTAL JUNE.03 MAY.03 APL.03 MAR.03 FEB.03 JAN.03 DEC.02 UOM   PARTICULARS SL NO ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCE FOR THE SEASON 2002-2003(MONTH WISE)
Remarks: Saving of power in terms of money will be Rs 77.15 lakhs /month. @Rs 5.00/KWH 32.2 23.27 34.3 24.63 34.3 25.57 25.13 24.69 23.27 23.61 23.61 Units Power per Ton of Cane 23       48.76 70.91 48.18 47.96 48.37 47.62 47.69 49.47 % Steam % Cane 22       4.52 4.93 4.85 4.66 4.61 4.37 4.17 4.26 % Molasses % Cane 21       31.35 34.15 31.55 31.51 31.71 30.99 30.45 29.6 % Final Molasses Purity 20       29.56 31.63 30.75 30.19 29.42 29.06 28.82 27.53 % Bagasse % Cane 19       1.86 1.9 1.84 1.84 1.85 1.86 1.88 1.89 % Pol % Bagasse 18       91.27 90.46 91.14 91.19 91.15 91.39 91.49 91.66 % Reduced BH. Extraction 17       95.73 94.48 95.64 96.02 96.12 95.88 95.31 94.79 % Reduced Mill Extraction 16       0.1 0.288 0.263 0.06 0.058 0.057 0.062 0.069 % d)Unknown         0.08 0.105 0.087 0.08 0.084 0.083 0.081 0.08 % c)Filter Cake         0.55 0.6 0.57 0.56 0.545 0.54 0.543 0.521 % b)Bagasse         1.27 1.45 1.369 1.31 1.306 1.218 1.143 1.13 % a)Final Molasses         2 2.443 2.284 2.01 1.993 1.898 1.828 1.8 % Total Losses 15       11.5 9.11 11.025 12.14 12.627 11.947 10.656 9.844 % Pol % Cane 14       4368.85 2732.5 4131.368 4382.66 4525.41 4999.27 4768.2 3468.45 MTs Crushing Day Average 13       4217.33 2732.5 4131.368 4236.57 4525.41 4820.73 4153 3468.45 MTs Crop Day Average 12       4541.39 2731.8 5037.504 4510.66 4771 5088.96 4815.3 3522.43 MTs Crushing Rate / 24 hours 11       4162.95 2504.2 4617.712 4134.77 4373.12 4664.88 4414 3228.9 MTs Crushing Rate / 22 hours 10       7.06 10.-20 6.97 6.08 5.14 5.27 13.75 0.53 % Down Time % Available 9       112-10 9.-15 30.15 1.-50 17-00 3.-15 48-50 1.-45 HRs   e)Others         97-10 0-00 0-00 29-15 0-00 26-15 41-40 0-00 HRs d)General Cleaning         1.-20 0-00 0-00 0-00 0-30 0-00 0-50 0-00 HRs   c)Process  
 
 
 
BY Technological Up gradation ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Acquire Best Available Technology in New Projects ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
KCP Boiler 70 TPH, 43.4ata & 400 ºC TBW Boiler 70 TPH, 67ata & 485 ºC 9.74   MW, 70 tph TG Comparison Prevailing System Proposed System Multi fuel Boiler 105ata, 525 º C, 88% Topping up TG set 18.6 MW, 61 tph TG GEC Turbine SIEMENS Turbine C C 11 KV BUS 9.74   MW, 70 tph TG 18.6 MW, 61 tph TG C C GEC Turbine SIEMENS Turbine 67ata & 485 ºC 42ata & 400 ºC
Actual Thermal Efficiency of existing power plant on date Heat value of KPC boiler  ≈ 767 Kcal/kg (from steam table) (at 43.4 ata and 400ºC) Then net heat value of KPC boiler  ≈ 767 – 105 ≈ 662 Kcal/kg. Thermal efficiency of KPC boiler = η th  = (Net heat value * Total Steam generation) / (CV of  the bagasse * total bagasse consumption)   η th  = (662 * 122759) / (2277 * 61672)   = 57.99% ≈ 58% ( against 69% of design)  Heat value of TBW boiler = 807.7 Kcal/kg (From steam table) (at 67 ata and 485 ºC) Then net heat value of TBW boiler ≈ 807.7 – 105 ≈ 702.7 Kcal/kg GCV of coal = (CV of coal * total coal consumption) / Total fuel consumption   = (5500 * 4622) / 56213 = 452.22 Kcal/kg GCV of Bagasse = (CV of bagasse * total bagasse consumption) / Total fuel consumption   = (2277 * 51591) / 56213 = 2089.77 Kcal/kg Then net GCV = 452.22 + 2089.77 = 2542 Kcal/kg
Then net heat gain = heat gain * steam required for cane * efficiency of Topping TG set   = 13.8 * 125*10 3  * 0.9   = 1552.5 Kcal/kg Total power generation = 1552.5/860 = 1.8 MW Transfer rate = 1800 * 24 * 330 * 1.96 =  2.79  crore.
Thermal efficiency of TBW boiler = η th  = (Net heat value * Total Steam generation) /    (Net GCV * total fuel consumption)   = (702.7 * 129399) * 100 / (2542 * 56213)   η th  =  63 % (against  71.75 % of design) Average thermal efficiency of KPC & TBW boiler = (58+63) / 2 =  60.5 %
Expected direct efficiency of multifuel boiler = 84% Then fuel saving = 84 – 60.5 = 23.5% Cost of fuel saving = Actual cane crushed * % of fuel caned * % fuel save for 02-03  = 729598 * 0.3 * 0.235   = Rs. 51436.65 Then total saving of bagasse = 51437 * 500   = Rs. 2,57,815   =  2.57  crore Net gain in power = 2.79 crore Net gain in fuel save = 2.57 crore Then total gain = 2.79+2.57 =  5.36  crore
Heat value of AFBC boiler = 821.5 Kcal/kg (from steam table) (at 515 º C and 105 kg/cm 2 ) Then net heat gain = 821.5 – 807.7   = 13.8 Kcal/kg From data Budgeted crane crushed/year = 775000 M.T Actual crane crushed/year = 72598.401 M.T No. of crop days = 170 days % Steam required for crane = 48% % of bagasse in cane = 30% Then steam required for cane/hr. = (budgeted cane crushed * %steam reqd. for cane) /   (No. of days * 24)   = (775000 * 0.48) / (170*24)   = 91.176 tph   ≈ 100 tph For maximum efficiency steam required for cane/hr = 100/0.80 = 125 tph
The Major advantage of Co- Gen power is ;- ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
STEPS FOOR SAVINGS ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

More Related Content

Viewers also liked (6)

Ill effects-of-thermal-power-plants3199
Ill effects-of-thermal-power-plants3199Ill effects-of-thermal-power-plants3199
Ill effects-of-thermal-power-plants3199
 
Understanding coal fired_thermal_power_plants
Understanding coal fired_thermal_power_plantsUnderstanding coal fired_thermal_power_plants
Understanding coal fired_thermal_power_plants
 
Ethical hacking
Ethical hackingEthical hacking
Ethical hacking
 
Safety health and environment aspects in thermal power plants
Safety health and environment aspects in thermal power plantsSafety health and environment aspects in thermal power plants
Safety health and environment aspects in thermal power plants
 
What's Next in Growth? 2016
What's Next in Growth? 2016What's Next in Growth? 2016
What's Next in Growth? 2016
 
32 Ways a Digital Marketing Consultant Can Help Grow Your Business
32 Ways a Digital Marketing Consultant Can Help Grow Your Business32 Ways a Digital Marketing Consultant Can Help Grow Your Business
32 Ways a Digital Marketing Consultant Can Help Grow Your Business
 

Similar to 13 b shukla

Cea’s perspective on_energy_efficiency_in_thermal_power_generation_cea
Cea’s perspective on_energy_efficiency_in_thermal_power_generation_ceaCea’s perspective on_energy_efficiency_in_thermal_power_generation_cea
Cea’s perspective on_energy_efficiency_in_thermal_power_generation_cea
Probodh Mallick
 
Biofuel sbg bhn_bakar_alternatif3
Biofuel sbg bhn_bakar_alternatif3Biofuel sbg bhn_bakar_alternatif3
Biofuel sbg bhn_bakar_alternatif3
Bisrul Tambunan
 
Operation - OR for JAN 23.pptx
Operation - OR for JAN 23.pptxOperation - OR for JAN 23.pptx
Operation - OR for JAN 23.pptx
PowerMurugan
 
Boiler ea case study 16 jan 2012 varanasi
Boiler ea case study  16 jan 2012 varanasiBoiler ea case study  16 jan 2012 varanasi
Boiler ea case study 16 jan 2012 varanasi
D.Pawan Kumar
 
PLD-FINAL-REPORT
PLD-FINAL-REPORTPLD-FINAL-REPORT
PLD-FINAL-REPORT
adnan malak
 
COOP training-Bokhari
COOP training-BokhariCOOP training-Bokhari
COOP training-Bokhari
Assad Bokhari
 
Dewatering project pit alam 1 3
Dewatering project pit alam 1   3Dewatering project pit alam 1   3
Dewatering project pit alam 1 3
Muhammad Ichsan
 
Styrene Production by Catalytic Dehydrogenation of Ethylbenzene
Styrene Production by Catalytic Dehydrogenation of Ethylbenzene Styrene Production by Catalytic Dehydrogenation of Ethylbenzene
Styrene Production by Catalytic Dehydrogenation of Ethylbenzene
Michelle Otutu
 
8b80ade8 7b96-4114-9e36-76dcf21dc74d-150219134514-conversion-gate02 (1) (1) (...
8b80ade8 7b96-4114-9e36-76dcf21dc74d-150219134514-conversion-gate02 (1) (1) (...8b80ade8 7b96-4114-9e36-76dcf21dc74d-150219134514-conversion-gate02 (1) (1) (...
8b80ade8 7b96-4114-9e36-76dcf21dc74d-150219134514-conversion-gate02 (1) (1) (...
Shubham Garg
 
Dimethyl Ether Production
Dimethyl Ether ProductionDimethyl Ether Production
Dimethyl Ether Production
Aziz Albattah
 

Similar to 13 b shukla (20)

Cogeneration power plant
Cogeneration power plantCogeneration power plant
Cogeneration power plant
 
Cea’s perspective on_energy_efficiency_in_thermal_power_generation_cea
Cea’s perspective on_energy_efficiency_in_thermal_power_generation_ceaCea’s perspective on_energy_efficiency_in_thermal_power_generation_cea
Cea’s perspective on_energy_efficiency_in_thermal_power_generation_cea
 
Auxiliary Consumption and Saving due to Increase in Boiler Efficiency
Auxiliary Consumption and Saving due to Increase in Boiler EfficiencyAuxiliary Consumption and Saving due to Increase in Boiler Efficiency
Auxiliary Consumption and Saving due to Increase in Boiler Efficiency
 
COAL FIRED BOILER -PRINCIPALS.pdf
COAL FIRED BOILER -PRINCIPALS.pdfCOAL FIRED BOILER -PRINCIPALS.pdf
COAL FIRED BOILER -PRINCIPALS.pdf
 
Biofuel sbg bhn_bakar_alternatif3
Biofuel sbg bhn_bakar_alternatif3Biofuel sbg bhn_bakar_alternatif3
Biofuel sbg bhn_bakar_alternatif3
 
Operation - OR for JAN 23.pptx
Operation - OR for JAN 23.pptxOperation - OR for JAN 23.pptx
Operation - OR for JAN 23.pptx
 
Boiler ea case study 16 jan 2012 varanasi
Boiler ea case study  16 jan 2012 varanasiBoiler ea case study  16 jan 2012 varanasi
Boiler ea case study 16 jan 2012 varanasi
 
PLD-FINAL-REPORT
PLD-FINAL-REPORTPLD-FINAL-REPORT
PLD-FINAL-REPORT
 
COOP training-Bokhari
COOP training-BokhariCOOP training-Bokhari
COOP training-Bokhari
 
Dewatering project pit alam 1 3
Dewatering project pit alam 1   3Dewatering project pit alam 1   3
Dewatering project pit alam 1 3
 
Styrene Production by Catalytic Dehydrogenation of Ethylbenzene
Styrene Production by Catalytic Dehydrogenation of Ethylbenzene Styrene Production by Catalytic Dehydrogenation of Ethylbenzene
Styrene Production by Catalytic Dehydrogenation of Ethylbenzene
 
Indian scenario of super critical power plants issues and challenges by ntpc...
Indian scenario of super critical power plants  issues and challenges by ntpc...Indian scenario of super critical power plants  issues and challenges by ntpc...
Indian scenario of super critical power plants issues and challenges by ntpc...
 
Performance Evaluation of 830kW Wind Turbine and an Analysis of Various Param...
Performance Evaluation of 830kW Wind Turbine and an Analysis of Various Param...Performance Evaluation of 830kW Wind Turbine and an Analysis of Various Param...
Performance Evaluation of 830kW Wind Turbine and an Analysis of Various Param...
 
Balance de flotacion por el metodo computacional
Balance de flotacion por el metodo computacionalBalance de flotacion por el metodo computacional
Balance de flotacion por el metodo computacional
 
presentation
presentationpresentation
presentation
 
Heat Recovery System to Save the Fuel (Bagasse) by Eliminating the Feedwater ...
Heat Recovery System to Save the Fuel (Bagasse) by Eliminating the Feedwater ...Heat Recovery System to Save the Fuel (Bagasse) by Eliminating the Feedwater ...
Heat Recovery System to Save the Fuel (Bagasse) by Eliminating the Feedwater ...
 
Analysing shovel dumper productivity for coal mine
Analysing shovel dumper productivity for coal mineAnalysing shovel dumper productivity for coal mine
Analysing shovel dumper productivity for coal mine
 
8b80ade8 7b96-4114-9e36-76dcf21dc74d-150219134514-conversion-gate02 (1) (1) (...
8b80ade8 7b96-4114-9e36-76dcf21dc74d-150219134514-conversion-gate02 (1) (1) (...8b80ade8 7b96-4114-9e36-76dcf21dc74d-150219134514-conversion-gate02 (1) (1) (...
8b80ade8 7b96-4114-9e36-76dcf21dc74d-150219134514-conversion-gate02 (1) (1) (...
 
Dimethyl Ether Production
Dimethyl Ether ProductionDimethyl Ether Production
Dimethyl Ether Production
 
Water Audit.pptx
Water Audit.pptxWater Audit.pptx
Water Audit.pptx
 

Recently uploaded

Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
ciinovamais
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
kauryashika82
 
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
fonyou31
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
SoniaTolstoy
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
 
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationInteractive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
 
Disha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdf
Disha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdfDisha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdf
Disha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdf
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
 
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
 
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDMeasures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
 
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpin
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpinStudent login on Anyboli platform.helpin
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpin
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
 
9548086042 for call girls in Indira Nagar with room service
9548086042  for call girls in Indira Nagar  with room service9548086042  for call girls in Indira Nagar  with room service
9548086042 for call girls in Indira Nagar with room service
 
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
 

13 b shukla

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 6. COGENERATION PLANT LAYOUT Feed water PRDS BOILER ALTERNATOR TURBINE TO PROCESS TO PROCESS Fuel Air TO POWER SUPPLY CONDENSER TO COOLING TOWER
  • 7.
  • 8. Steps for conservation 1.Government of India enforced the energy conservation act 2001 with effect from 1.3.2002. 2.The initial phase of 5 years would be implementation of the act . 3.The act provides mainly for efficient use of energy and its conservation. 4.Industry using
  • 9.
  • 10. Energy Saving potential areas in sugar industries 1.Convertion from low Pressure to HP Boilers 2.Steam Boilers (Reducing moisture percentage in Bagasse) 3.Crushing section 4.Evaporator section
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15. Comparison of performance during various seasns from 1998 to 2002 40.7 4.84 7.06 11.9 11.9 8.96 11.23 10.3 7.06 % Lost % on Available Hours 14 53.7 59.3 51.08 110 51-05 110-25 109-25 97-15 97-10 Hrs-Mts   General Cleaning 13 94.3 66 4 70 70-00 24-25 4.-00 53-55 11.-10 Hrs-Mts   Electrical 12 97.5 176 4.5 181 180-45 24-55 4.-30 59-30 64-35 Hrs-Mts   Mechanical 11         204-10 154-55 142-15 57-50 6.-00 Hrs-Mts   No Cane 10 Rs 51.57 lakhs per season                     DOWN TIME ANALYSIS   4.19 1.08 24.68 25.8     25.18 25.46 24.68 KWH   Power / Ton of Cane 9         49.74 49.45 48.75 50.71 48.76 %   Steam % Cane 8 2.32 1.19 50.11 51.3 51.3 50.4 50.11 50.56 50.66 %   Bagasse Moisture 7         8.187 9.23 9.758 9.11 9.51 %   Recovery 6         3918.42 4247.98 4063.22 3857 4217.33 MT   Crop Day Average 5         4614.77 4783.32 4576.34 4311.12 4541.39 MT   Crushing Rate/24 hours 4         4230.29 4385.11 4194.98 3951 4162.95 MT   Crushing Rate/22 hours 3         188 165 159 191 173     No. of Crop Days 2         736663 700916 646051 736838 729598 MT   Cane Crushed 1         Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual UOM   PARTICULARS SL NO. % Saving scope Diff Min Max 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03      
  • 16. Coomparison of performance with best two seasons       6173-40 3816-33 4148-39 HRS Total Available Hours 15         80-120 90to130 % Sugar quality ICUMSA 14       1.73 1.78 1.86 % Pol % Bagasse 13       50.52 50.11 50.66 % Bagasse Moisture 12           78.18 % Cane Preparatory Index 11       31.22 30.32 29.56 % Bagasse % Cane 10       4.415 4.449 4.52 % Molasses % Cane 9       0.037 0.049 0.1 % d)Unknown Loss         0.99 1.211 1.27 % c)Final Molasses         0.05 0.07 0.08 % b)Filter Cake         0.54 0.541 0.55 % a)Bagasse         1.617 1.871 2 % Total Losses 8       10.963 11.618 11.5 % Pol in Cane 7       9.357 9.758 9.51 %   Recovery 6       2796.416 4063.216 4217.3 MT Crop Day Average 5       3076.152 4576.344 4541.4 MT Crushing Rate / 24 hours 4       2819.806 4149.982 4162.9 MT Crushing Rate / 22 hours 3       258 159 173   No. of Crop Days 2       721475.5 646051.4 729598 MT Cane Crushed 1                           2500 5000 5000 MT Plant Sanctioned Capacity                       %saving scope Min Max 1994-95 2000-01 2002-03 UOM   PARTICULAR SL NO
  • 17.   Possible increased in crushing of cane per season= 24220 MT/season   Remarks:Possible saving of running hours =128 hours     128 hours 213.8 341.8                     694.65 1477.49 2325 Qtls   Process Stock-Brown Sugar 30       8.82 11.23 7.06 %   Lost % on Avaible Hours 29 33.17 112.166 167.83 168-45 167-50 112-10 HRS   Others 28 11.2 97.16 109.416 164-00 109-25 97-10 HRS   General Cleaning 27       5.-30 4.-00 11.-10 HRS   Electrical 26 93 4.5 64.58 152-15 4.-30 64-35 HRS   Mechanical 25       54-15 142-15 6.-00 HRS   No Cane 24                 DOWN TIME ANALYSIS         9.83 9.923 9.68 % Peak Period Recovery 23 Rs 21.62 lakhs/season       25.18 24.68 KWH Power / Ton of Cane 22 2.77 47.41 48.76 47.41 48.75 48.76 % Steam % Cane 21       93.43 91.66 91.27 % Reduced B.House Extraction 20       95.89 96.02 95.73 % Reduced Mill Extraction 19       3.69 3.78 4.12   Milling Loss 18       295.62 293.58 259.14 % Imbibition% Fiber 17       544-45 428-25 292-55 HRS Down Time Hours 16
  • 18.       75-45 10.-20 21-35 12.-40 20-45 5.-55 5.-00 0-00 HRs b)Engineering(Mech&Elec)         6.-00 0-00 0-00 0-00 0-00 0-00 6.-00 0-00 HRs a)Want of Cane         292-55 19-35 51-50 43-45 38-15 35-25 102-20 1.-45 HRs Stoppage Hours 8       3855-44 172-28 692-10 676-15 705-45 636-35 641-40 330-51 HRs Total Working Hours 7       4148-39 192-03 744-00 720-00 744-00 672-00 744-00 332-36 HRs Total Available Hours 6       167 8 31 29 31 27 27 14 Days Season Days-Crushing Day 5       173 8 31 30 31 28 31 14 Days Season Days-Crop Day 4       696220 25397 114975 13123.3 14747 13227.5 113875 3100 Qtls Sugar Production 3       9.61 6.68 8.75 10.14 10.66 10.06 8.84 8.05 %   Recovery 2       729598 21860 128072.4 127097 140288 134980 128742 48558.3 MT Cane Crushed 1                               %saving Min Max TOTAL JUNE.03 MAY.03 APL.03 MAR.03 FEB.03 JAN.03 DEC.02 UOM   PARTICULARS SL NO ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCE FOR THE SEASON 2002-2003(MONTH WISE)
  • 19. Remarks: Saving of power in terms of money will be Rs 77.15 lakhs /month. @Rs 5.00/KWH 32.2 23.27 34.3 24.63 34.3 25.57 25.13 24.69 23.27 23.61 23.61 Units Power per Ton of Cane 23       48.76 70.91 48.18 47.96 48.37 47.62 47.69 49.47 % Steam % Cane 22       4.52 4.93 4.85 4.66 4.61 4.37 4.17 4.26 % Molasses % Cane 21       31.35 34.15 31.55 31.51 31.71 30.99 30.45 29.6 % Final Molasses Purity 20       29.56 31.63 30.75 30.19 29.42 29.06 28.82 27.53 % Bagasse % Cane 19       1.86 1.9 1.84 1.84 1.85 1.86 1.88 1.89 % Pol % Bagasse 18       91.27 90.46 91.14 91.19 91.15 91.39 91.49 91.66 % Reduced BH. Extraction 17       95.73 94.48 95.64 96.02 96.12 95.88 95.31 94.79 % Reduced Mill Extraction 16       0.1 0.288 0.263 0.06 0.058 0.057 0.062 0.069 % d)Unknown         0.08 0.105 0.087 0.08 0.084 0.083 0.081 0.08 % c)Filter Cake         0.55 0.6 0.57 0.56 0.545 0.54 0.543 0.521 % b)Bagasse         1.27 1.45 1.369 1.31 1.306 1.218 1.143 1.13 % a)Final Molasses         2 2.443 2.284 2.01 1.993 1.898 1.828 1.8 % Total Losses 15       11.5 9.11 11.025 12.14 12.627 11.947 10.656 9.844 % Pol % Cane 14       4368.85 2732.5 4131.368 4382.66 4525.41 4999.27 4768.2 3468.45 MTs Crushing Day Average 13       4217.33 2732.5 4131.368 4236.57 4525.41 4820.73 4153 3468.45 MTs Crop Day Average 12       4541.39 2731.8 5037.504 4510.66 4771 5088.96 4815.3 3522.43 MTs Crushing Rate / 24 hours 11       4162.95 2504.2 4617.712 4134.77 4373.12 4664.88 4414 3228.9 MTs Crushing Rate / 22 hours 10       7.06 10.-20 6.97 6.08 5.14 5.27 13.75 0.53 % Down Time % Available 9       112-10 9.-15 30.15 1.-50 17-00 3.-15 48-50 1.-45 HRs   e)Others         97-10 0-00 0-00 29-15 0-00 26-15 41-40 0-00 HRs d)General Cleaning         1.-20 0-00 0-00 0-00 0-30 0-00 0-50 0-00 HRs   c)Process  
  • 20.  
  • 21.  
  • 22.  
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25. KCP Boiler 70 TPH, 43.4ata & 400 ºC TBW Boiler 70 TPH, 67ata & 485 ºC 9.74 MW, 70 tph TG Comparison Prevailing System Proposed System Multi fuel Boiler 105ata, 525 º C, 88% Topping up TG set 18.6 MW, 61 tph TG GEC Turbine SIEMENS Turbine C C 11 KV BUS 9.74 MW, 70 tph TG 18.6 MW, 61 tph TG C C GEC Turbine SIEMENS Turbine 67ata & 485 ºC 42ata & 400 ºC
  • 26. Actual Thermal Efficiency of existing power plant on date Heat value of KPC boiler ≈ 767 Kcal/kg (from steam table) (at 43.4 ata and 400ºC) Then net heat value of KPC boiler ≈ 767 – 105 ≈ 662 Kcal/kg. Thermal efficiency of KPC boiler = η th = (Net heat value * Total Steam generation) / (CV of the bagasse * total bagasse consumption) η th = (662 * 122759) / (2277 * 61672) = 57.99% ≈ 58% ( against 69% of design) Heat value of TBW boiler = 807.7 Kcal/kg (From steam table) (at 67 ata and 485 ºC) Then net heat value of TBW boiler ≈ 807.7 – 105 ≈ 702.7 Kcal/kg GCV of coal = (CV of coal * total coal consumption) / Total fuel consumption = (5500 * 4622) / 56213 = 452.22 Kcal/kg GCV of Bagasse = (CV of bagasse * total bagasse consumption) / Total fuel consumption = (2277 * 51591) / 56213 = 2089.77 Kcal/kg Then net GCV = 452.22 + 2089.77 = 2542 Kcal/kg
  • 27. Then net heat gain = heat gain * steam required for cane * efficiency of Topping TG set = 13.8 * 125*10 3 * 0.9 = 1552.5 Kcal/kg Total power generation = 1552.5/860 = 1.8 MW Transfer rate = 1800 * 24 * 330 * 1.96 = 2.79 crore.
  • 28. Thermal efficiency of TBW boiler = η th = (Net heat value * Total Steam generation) / (Net GCV * total fuel consumption) = (702.7 * 129399) * 100 / (2542 * 56213) η th = 63 % (against 71.75 % of design) Average thermal efficiency of KPC & TBW boiler = (58+63) / 2 = 60.5 %
  • 29. Expected direct efficiency of multifuel boiler = 84% Then fuel saving = 84 – 60.5 = 23.5% Cost of fuel saving = Actual cane crushed * % of fuel caned * % fuel save for 02-03 = 729598 * 0.3 * 0.235 = Rs. 51436.65 Then total saving of bagasse = 51437 * 500 = Rs. 2,57,815 = 2.57 crore Net gain in power = 2.79 crore Net gain in fuel save = 2.57 crore Then total gain = 2.79+2.57 = 5.36 crore
  • 30. Heat value of AFBC boiler = 821.5 Kcal/kg (from steam table) (at 515 º C and 105 kg/cm 2 ) Then net heat gain = 821.5 – 807.7 = 13.8 Kcal/kg From data Budgeted crane crushed/year = 775000 M.T Actual crane crushed/year = 72598.401 M.T No. of crop days = 170 days % Steam required for crane = 48% % of bagasse in cane = 30% Then steam required for cane/hr. = (budgeted cane crushed * %steam reqd. for cane) / (No. of days * 24) = (775000 * 0.48) / (170*24) = 91.176 tph ≈ 100 tph For maximum efficiency steam required for cane/hr = 100/0.80 = 125 tph
  • 31.
  • 32.