Place an order for this assignment or any other paper at superbessaywriters.com. We guarantee High-quality papers at a discounted price

1. superbessaywriters.com
SOC 331 Week 5 DQ 1 Retributive Justice and MandatoryLife
Imprisonment for JuvenileOffen
Pressured by assignments? Let experts at
superbessaywriters.com write it.
In Chapter 5 of the textbook, the author examines retributive
justice from the standpoint of the means of punishment (Section
5.2). He calls attention to the length of prison sentences and, in
particular, the issue of mandatory life sentences for juvenile
offenders.
In 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court declared laws that require
judges to impose life-without-parole sentences for juveniles to
be in violation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of “cruel
and unusual punishments.” The decision (Miller v. Alabama)
was a 5-4 split in the Court – which is typical of many such
decisions that apply the cruel and unusual punishment provision.
Your initial post must analyze the retributive justice issues of
mandatory, life-without-parole sentences. Consider the facts
ofMiller v. Alabama: Defendant Miller, a 14-year old boy, with
an accomplice beat the victim with a baseball bat and set his
trailer on fire with the victim inside. Defendant Miller was tried
as an adult for capital murder while committing arson.
Is a mandatory, life-without-parole sentence just in such
circumstances? Remember that “just” may or may not be the
same as “constitutional.” Summarize both the pros and the cons
of your answer to this question, and critically evaluate these pros
and cons, applying principles of retributive justice discussed in
the text. Your evaluation must respond to the pros and cons,

2. superbessaywriters.com
giving persuasive reasons why you agree with some and
disagree with some
Pressured by assignments? Let experts at
superbessaywriters.com write it.