Essays Paying College Athletes

Paying College Athletes Essay
Every child, at some point in their life, dream about becoming a rock star, a doctor or an
astronaut. The career that stands out the most in young boys and girls dreams, is becoming a
professional athlete; Why is that? One reason could be the ever increasing media coverage on
each individual sport. Certain channels are devoted just for that particular sport, keeping viewers
updated and thirsting to get out and play just like professionals on television. Another reason
could be, how easy it is to get out in the backyard as a kid to shoot the basketball, throw a football,
or hit a baseball because it is a lot harder to perform heart surgery or fly to the moon when you're
only a child. With that being said, it is so easy to look up to a...show more content...
With that in mind, to keep college sports prestigious, colleges must come up with a way to keep
their athletes interested in playing at their school until they have finished their degrees. College
athletes at the Division One level should be paid to play. When the topic is brought up about why
college athletes should be paid to play, more then half of people instantly will disagree and say
"no way, what for"? But have they really looked into all the reasons pointing towards paying
them? I know it sounds like I'm trying to say give them all million dollar contracts and call it a
done deal, but that is not the case. Aside from the athletic and academic scholarships to pay for
tuition, the money they would be receiving would be miniscule to what they could be making if
they were working at a full–time job instead. This money would basically cover small costs an
athlete must make when living on his own, since there is no time for a job, he has to balance the
careful act of school and sports. Only a select few big time athletes will actually make it all the
way to the big leagues and receive a big payout. Once this money distribution to the players is in
affect, it will clean up a lot of problems in college sports. One question that needs to be answered
first is, what is the NCAA? The NCAA or (National Collegiate Athletic Association) are the
members that make the rules for college sports at most colleges and
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Essay on Paying College Athletes
College sports are big money makers now a days. For most universities, the athletic department
serves as one of the main sources of cash flow. Athletes are used to create millions of dollars for
the NCAA and the schools that they participate in, and never receive a penny. If we are talking
about profit, if all bonds with the university were removed, an athletic department representing itself
could compete with some of the most successful companies. So, why does the most important parts
of the machine, the players, do not receive any money for their training and participation? The
answer lies in the NCAA which keeps all the money and their practice of keeping all the revenue for
future use. College athletes should be paid for their...show more content...
This leaves basically give no time to earn money. The way life is for a student athlete is very
different from what a regular student's life is. A student–athlete is required to attend practice for 10
to 20 hours per week which is around 4 hours a day, traveling to games everywhere throughout the
season, and at the same time, having to deal with the same amount of academic work as regular
students. Everyone who is against paying student–athletes rely on the fact that they get paid through
scholarships, so apparently they're already getting paid. Yes, a scholarship indeed is a form of
compensation. A scholarship is good to have, but it is not enough to go through life as a
student–athlete. A scholarship will not cover the bills. Not only that but, unlike regular students
without athletics, student–athletes must also most of the time take care of their families and
spouses. Believe it or not many student athletes are married, and most of the athletes married
have children. The students which don't have spouses or children, most of them have to care for
parents and siblings. Universities would not get financially hurt if they would decide to pay
players just a little. The average Division One School profits around $6 million per year only on
football and basketball. Universities like University of Florida or University of Michigan have
profits of more than $10 million per year on all their

College Athletes Should Be Paid
Paying college athletes would negate the whole point of a college. Colleges give many citizens
across the country a chance to gain an incredible education that will aid them in their life. Colleges
accept every person of any age to attend. Sometimes it may be middle aged citizens looking to go
to school after waiting years to make a decision, and sometimes it may be a recently graduated
teenager out of high school. No matter who it is or where they came from, colleges allow anyone to
gain an education that fuels their interests and helps them obtain a job after they graduate. Although
most are focused on getting an education, there is a significant amount of students, known as
student–athletes, that are only focused on playing sports. Through the years, men and women of
America have created a controversy surrounding these student–athletes and the colleges they are
currently attending. The argument is whether or not colleges should pay their student–athletes for
their labors and contributions they give their teams and schools. Citizens of America love college
sports. College...show more content...
Garda states, "College athletes are, in fact, already compensated for their athletic services, in the
sense that most receive either full or partial athletic scholarships that cover the costs of their tuition,
room and board, and textbooks" (Garda 1). College athletes receive scholarships that pay for
necessary college materials that many students do not have the opportunity to be granted. College
can cost up to tens of thousands of dollars to attend, and there are many people across the country
who cannot afford a college education. College athletes do not need to be paid extra just for playing
a sport when they already receive a sufficient amount of funds for their education. Student–athletes
should take advantage of their scholarships and use the money to focus on getting an education
instead of

Paying College Athletes
It's very clear that college is very expensive, many families do have trouble paying for college, but
there's always a solution to this. There are many reasons on how you can pay for college like,
loans, grants etc. Yet, there are still more solutions to pay for college, scholarships. Here are some
important statistics involving scholarships, there are 12:1 odds to earn a scholarship, you also
could earn $19,557 on average, per year, earning scholarships. Working hard for your money to earn
a scholarship if better than getting paid 'freely.' I strongly disagree with paying college athletes for
various reasons, you can work harder to earn a scholarship, if you have a "poorer," family there is
still alternative solutions. There is many ways to

Persuasive Essay On Paying College Athletes
(Attention Getter) What if I told you that for decades, students have worked over 40 hours a
week and received absolutely no pay. College athletes are expected to balance the immense
workload of school work and represent their school well in athletics. (Personal Credibility) One of
my friends happens to play basketball for a Division I college and he constantly tells me how the
system is unfair. These players practically work a full time job and also have to keep on top of
their academics and don't see a penny. (Audience Appeal) (Visual aid) There are currently over
460,000 NCAA athletes and over 24 million Americans who are actively engaged in college
sports. I'm sure a majority of you know a person who was involved in the NCAA system such as
family and friends. This topic has been around for decades now affects thousands of people.
(Preview) Today, we will analyze how the NCAA rules influence college athletes, the pros and
cons of paying college athletes, and how it can improve society as a whole. [Transition: We will
now discover how this hinders college athletes in a variety of ways and how the NCAA is taking
an unfair advantage on these athletes] Problem: Athletes work hard and are the reason for the
success of the NCAA The NCAA is more than capable of paying its athletes but doesn't do so In
the article titled, Why College Athletes Should Be Paid , Tyson Hartnett discusses how the NCAA
signed a 14 year deal with CBS for 10.8 billion dollars. As a result, the NCAA has

Essay on Paying College Athletes
Should college athletes get paid more money?
There has been a constant debate the past few years on whether college athletes, particularly
football players, should get paid. In 1988, the Nebraska legislature passed a bill that would allow
the University of Nebraska football players to receive better cash incentives. The bill was later
vetoed by Governor Kay Orr, who was governor of Nebraska at the time (O'Toole etal. 2). . The
dispute comes from coaches, parents of the players, and the players themselves arguing that
universities make money off their own athletes and the athletes, in turn, do not receive any money
from that. Many NCAA officials disagree stating their case that college athletes already receive
...show more content...
But the bill is getting exploited by NCAA rules and by the official in the Big 12.
According to Big 12 Commissioner Kevin Weiberg, the bill, if passed in Nebraska, has a slim
chance of passing in other states that has schools in the Big 12. He states, "At this point, I know
of no other state legislative activity that relates to a bill like this" (cite). Weiberg expands on how
he is not alone in this decision by saying, "Our presidents and chancellors have been uniformly
opposed to any plan that would give the appearance of play–for–pay"(O'Toole etal. 2). With these
statements it seems like Chambers doesn't have good position in getting the bill passed, but the bill
can initiate an argument saying that if college athletes do not get paid, the temptation of illegal
consumption of money by athletes could rise.
In agreeing with Weiberg, Wally Renfro, who is an assistant to NCAA president Myles Brand, states,
"It (the bill) shouldn't happen for two reasons. One is philosophical. It's not the model of
intercollegiate athletics. Second, it's impractical. They're basically talking, I think, about paying
football players. I don't think that's going to stand the test of a court challenge from students who
play basketball or students who play baseball or students in the tennis

Paying College Athletes Every child at some point in their lives dream about becoming a rock
star, doctor or an astronaut, but the career that stands out the most is becoming a professional
athlete. Why? One reason could be the ever increasing media coverage on each individual sport
with certain channels devoted for just that particular sport, keeping viewers updated and thirsting
to get out and play. Another could be the ease of getting out in the backyard as a kid to shoot the
basketball, throw a football, or hit a baseball because it is harder to perform heart surgery or fly to
the moon when you're only a child. With that being said; it is easy to look up to a professional
athlete and put your heart and soul into them wearing...show more content...
College student athletes at the division one level should be paid to play. When the topic is
brought up about how college athletes should be paid to play, more then half of people instantly
will disagree and say no way, what for? But have they really looked into all the answers pointing
toward it might be a good idea to pay them? I know it sounds like I'm trying to say give them
million dollar contracts and call it a done deal but that is not the case. Aside from the athletic and
academic scholarships to pay for tuition, the money they would be receiving would be miniscule
to what they could be making if they were working at a job instead. This money would basically
cover small costs an athlete must make when living on his own, since there is no time for a job
when the careful balancing act of school and sports is in place. Only a select few big time
athletes will actually make it all the way to the show and receive a big payout. Once this money
distribution to the players is in affect, it will clean up a lot of problems in college sports. One
question that needs to be answered first is, what is the NCAA? The NCAA or (National Collegiate
Athletic Association) are the members that make the rules for college sports at most colleges and
universities across the United States. It is not just the college that isn't given athletes extra money it
is this organization that says

Essay On Paying College Athletes
Paying College Athletes Imagine a business that was bringing in millions of dollars every year in
revenue solely off the employees, and the individuals who are working to bring in the money, do
not see a cent of it. This is essentially how college athletes feel at their respective universities. The
National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) is seeing $11 billion dollars in revenue come
through their doors annually, and not one penny goes back to the student athletes who, in reality,
create that money. The money is passed down through the executives, directors and coaches, but
none is given to the players. With putting in an average to 43 hours per week, which is more than
the average work week, student athletes can be compared to...show more content...
The student athletes at most universities can be compared to employees, yet receiving no wages
(Cooper 12). Along with time in the classroom and being a full–time student, athletes are expected to
spend just as much time on their respective sport. In an article "Top 10 Reasons College Athletes
Should Be Paid," Dave Anderson explains that a college athlete spends just over 43 hours a week
devoted to their sport. Those hours are spent with mandatory lifting workouts, conditioning
workouts, watching film, position meetings, and practice. As I stated earlier, all this time that is
spent on their sport is in addition to the time spent in the classroom with homework and studying.
All of that added up well surpasses the time of the average work week at 40 hours and these
athletes can quite honestly be looked at as workers for their universities. A few problems arise as
a result of the athletes overloaded schedule. With barely any room for free time, these athletes
have no chance at obtaining even a part time job to earn money for things that a full scholarship
simply does not cover. 85 percent of college athletes on a scholarship live below the poverty line,
this fact found in a 2011 report (Mitchell and Edelman). That fact is surreal considering millions of
dollars are being made of these athletes and well over half of them are below the line. With the
overloaded schedule the athletes time to eat often does not align with the hours of operation of the
cafeteria which can

Research Paper On Paying College Athletes
As of today, there are over 460,000 NCAA student–athletes that compete in 24 different sports while
in college throughout the United States (NCAA). Over the past couple decades, the argument for
paying these college athletes has gained steam and is a hot topic in the sports community. However,
paying these college athletes is not feasible because most universities do not generate enough
revenue to provide them with a salary and some even lose money from the sports programs. These
collegiate student–athletes are amateurs and paying them would ruin the meaning of college athletics
. Also, playing college sports is a choice and a privilege with no mention or guarantee of a salary
besides a full–ride scholarship. Although some argue that...show more content...
They provide them with top notch training facilities and access to plenty of benefits. As of 2013,
the median amount that a Division 1 school spent on a scholarship football player alone was
$156,647 compared to $14,979 spent on a regular full–time student (Ross). These players are already
well taken care of and the idea of paying them on top of that would be just about impossible for
several schools. College student–athletes are amateurs and should be treated as such. Playing in the
NCAA as an athlete means that you are an amateur and not a professional. "Students are not
professional athletes who are paid salaries and incentives for a career in sports. They are students
receiving access to a college education through their participation in sports, for which they earn
scholarships to pay tuition, fees, room and board and other allowable expenses." (Mitchell). These
athletic programs allow the players to continue playing the sports they love at a higher level while
receiving a higher education as well. College sports would turn into a bidding war, create a "free
agency" and ruin the overall idea of amateurism that the NCAA was founded on if salaries were
involved. Larger schools that make more revenue or have more money to offer could easily
persuade the top recruits to come and play for them. This would create a bidding war and a certain
type of "free agency" that is foreign to the NCAA because the idea of being an amateur

Argumentative Essay On Paying College Athletes
Paying College Athletes I am against paying college athletes. I am against it because the athletes are
not just athletes; they are students too. The athletes are getting paid to go to college at the school
that they are attending. Being an athlete is second to being a student, because if the student–athletes
do not make the grade to pass, then they can not play. There is already so much going against paying
these student–athletes. Will all the athletes be paid the same amount? Will a starting football player
at Ohio State get paid the same amount or more than a walk–on redshirt freshman that will not get to
go on the field on Saturdays for three more years? Will some schools get to pay the student–athletes
more than others? For say...show more content...
The athletes would be trying to prove that they deserve more money than the guy they are playing
against. Also, others say that athletes work 43.3 hours each week on their sport. They also put in
ten hours of class work each day, which reflects into about ninety hours of work each week for a
student–athlete. The NCAA is an eleven billion dollar organizations ("Should"). There are also
other arguments saying that the athletes bring in the revenue. College sports are a business, every
person that buys a ticket to go either to a football game or a field hockey game generates money
("Paid"). The athletes put their bodies on the line every time they go to practice or a game.
Fitzpatrick said, "Players are entitled to some compensation because of the revenue they bring in
and the risk of injury they face." Mike Wilbon said, "If a music student goes out in the summer and
earns fifty grand, who objects? Who even knows? The student–musician is no less a college student
because he struck a lucrative deal" (Tinker). Each argument for the paying of college athletes has a
counterargument. One response is that it is possible that college sports would not become more
competitive. Just look at what happens in the professional leagues. Players would want more money
and may not play hard until they get what they want. Another is that the athletes should not be
bothered by how much

Essay On College Athletes Getting Paid
An issue that has been a well–known topic of conversation recently is the subject of college athletes
getting paid or not. This issue has been circulating amongst sports fans throughout the country.
Everyone from the fans, players, parents, and media groups all have opinions on this matter. Over
the past ten years college athletics has gained an enormous amount of popularity and income from
American audiences. As a result of this, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has
been debating about collegiate athletes getting paid for their participation and I am going to
discuss the reasons for why people are for it and why people are against it. The real questions most
people are wondering is: Is it ethically right to pay college...show more content...
As the final four comes to a close and the two champions are presented with their trophies, the real
winners in some people's eyes are the sponsors, advertisers, the schools, and finally the NCAA. All
of these groups are the ones who end up with the money generated as a result of the games in the
tournament and college athletes who particiapte. "The NCAA basketball tournaments, or "March
Madness," have become a huge business. As Forbes' Chris Smith wrote, CBS and Turner
Broadcasting make more than $1 billion off the games" (US News– Forbes' Chris Smith). Smith's
statement shows how much money these athletes' skills and contributions are generating. In return
for giving their efforts and producing all this money, the student athletes do not receive any of
these proceeds. People think college athletes should also be paid because of the money the NCAA
makes off using these athletes names and likeness, like jerseys with an athlete's number being sold
and even in video games being played. Because of this, a group of former players filed an

Argumentative Essay On Paying College Athletes
Since 1957, student athletes have been given scholarships to further their career in the sport that they
excel in. During the late 1970's, college basketball became more popular and more profitable.
("Paying College Athletes"). The controversy surrounding student athletes revolves around financial
compensation specifically concerning the position that college student athletes should either be paid,
not paid, or paid via scholarship.
The supporters believe that student athletes should get paid. The National College Athletic
Association (NCAA) brings in a lot of revenue, some believe that the student athletes should get a
fair share of that revenue. ESPN basketball analyst and former player Jay Bilas argues, "The NCAA
and the schools are making money off of the names and likenesses of the players, and the players are
being cut totally out of it. To me it's pretty simple analysis." ("Paying College Athletes"). According
to the article "Paying College Athletes: Should the National Collegiate Athletic Association(NCAA)
pay college athletes?" in 2009 the top earning school was University of Louisville with their revenue
at $25,494,904, expenses at $8,625,245, and their profit being $16,869,659. Supporters of athletes
believe that this is one of the very few times where people are helping an organization bring in
money that then don't see any in return. Boyce Watkins, a finance professor at Syracuse University
in upstate New York, said, "If what you do

Paying NCAA Athletes Essay
Outline Purpose: The purpose of this speech is to inform my audience about the issue of potentially
paying college athletes so that they may make an informed decision themselves. Thesis: As the
popularity, and revenue continues to grow in college sports, the debate will be taken to new heights
about whether or not college athletes are being exploited, and if they should be compensated
monetarily. I. (C)The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) defines amateurism as, "The
conviction that people should participate in sports as a hobby (for the fun of it) rather than for
money." The NCAA mandates that all college athletes maintain this level of amateurism while in
college, however, college sports have never been more of a...show more content...
b. Throw in all of the gear associated with being a Division I college athlete and you're looking at
a hefty amount of cash being invested in each athlete. C. Obviously some colleges have higher
budgets and higher amounts of athletes than others, so how do you make sure you pay each
athlete equally while still staying above the budget? You can't. 1. Trying to pay a football team
alone could plunge a university underneath their budget with an average of nearly 100 players per
team. 2. On top of that, there are 28 more sports with athletes waiting to have their pockets filled
with cash. 3. And finally, it takes away funding for other important academic areas of the college.
Transition: The budget just simply isn't there for a university of any size to reasonably pay each
and every athlete so finally I will explain some different ways an NCAA athlete could possibly
make some money. IV. There are plenty of ways an athlete could make money, but it would
require some self marketing and a little help from the NCAA. A. A player could seek out
additional sponsorships and advertising deals like a professional athlete. 1.The athlete isn't
technically making money off their playing ability they're making the money from the name on the
back of their jersey. B. Opposers of this idea would say that equality plays a factor here as well. 2.
Not every athlete is as

Most of us have watched a college sporting event at one point or another in our life. Few people
actually know and are aware of all the hard work, and dedication college athletes put towards their
sport. However, they do not receive a compensation for their hard work. These Athletes are
sometimes mistreated physically and mentally, yet the debate over whether or not to pay college
athletes is a big debate. One reason college athletes should get paid is because they make millions of
dollars for their school. College athletes have been dedicating their time, hard work, and much more
to their schools' athletic departments. Between the national television games they play in and
company endorsement money the school receives, each player...show more content...
College athletes play for an organization called the National Collegiate Athletic Association
(NCCA). The NCAA has so much control over these athletes, that they even control their
educational requirements. The NCAA requires all college athletes to maintain a 2.5 average on a
course load of at least 12 credits each semester. Some might say this is not a hard requirement to
maintain, but one must remember while playing a college sport, time is limited and some
athletes struggle to find time to get everything done. If a player is not able to maintain these
requirements, he or she might lose their scholarship if they are on one. After all, college sports
are big business, colleges are exploiting these young athletes making tons of money off of players,
while these young men themselves don't even have pocket money to spend. College athletes
should also get paid because they could get injured while playing the sport. It is highly unlikely if
a college athlete gets seriously hurt to the point where they need surgery, the college would pay
for it. These athletes endure various drills and push themselves to the max day in and day out
which makes them vulnerable to injury. So it would only be fair that the college athlete sees some
of the money they helped generate into the school. If a player does get hurt, it could end their
career. If this players dream was to be a professional athlete, they can't even achieve that dream

Paying College Athletes College sports are a phenomenon that keeps viewers coming back for
more. Stated in an article on Money Nation the NCAA makes an estimated $1 billion per year and
this number is still growing. What really is insane is that all that money is made off of college
athletes, who don't get a penny from that total number. The debate on whether or not college
athletes should be paid has been around for decades and probably will still be here for years to
come. Paying college athletes would make the teams unfair, change how hard players will work to
get better, affect the amateurism of college sports, and lastly influence the athlete's willingness to
participate in college sports. Many also look at this debate problem and say...show more content...
Recruitment is a process in which colleges find high–level prospects from around the country to
come play for them, and from there it is the athlete's choice to where he will be excelling his
athletic career. In an article written on recruiting 101, it states some of the top reasons a recruit
will choose the college they want to go to. Some that they introduce are "Location, Success of
Program, Coaches, and Incentives," ( There are many decisions that the athlete has to go through
when it comes to selecting the right college consisting of, location of school, the environment of
the college and the team staff, and incentives that were given to them from the colleges' booster
club members. Though it is against the rules for the colleges to give incentives to persuade a
recruit to come there, it isn't for a booster club member to present the athlete with a gift. This
happens to many college athletes, even though it is still against the rules, an example of this
happening was brought up in Walter Byers book Unsportsmanlike Conduct:Exploiting College
Athletes which included hall of famer Eric Dickerson. "After Dickerson finished college ball, he
disclosed that the $15,000 Trans Am was purchased by Texas A&M boosters who tried to recruit
him but failed" (Byers 20). Though in this situation it didn't work, in many other instances this
approach is successful. By paying college

When it comes to college athletics, there always will be a problem that arises. It is one of the
most controversial topics there is. One of the main issues within athletics is the idea of whether
to pay college athletes or not. Several studies have been done along with articles from various
sources. This has been on the rise especially since "March Madness" is coming up. "March
Madness" may only consist of three weekends, however, an 11 billion dollar deal is made to
televise the games (Wilbon). This is when you have to take the time to sit back and contemplate
whether these college athletes really are getting the fair end of the stick. Under NCAA laws it is
forbidden to pay these athletes for their performance yet at the same time they...show more content...
So even though they are given a significant amount, many athletes will owe between 8000 and
12,000 dollars. As stated before, many of these athletes are poor and cannot rub two pennies
together. It does not seem right that if they are not going to pay the athletes, then why not give them
a full scholarship.
We often forget that playing a sport is not the only way to earn a scholarship. Many students are
accepted for exceptional grades, involvement in the band, clubs, or being well rounded. Most of
these students just have to study to keep their scholarship, while the athletes have to work hard and
be a student. In a competitive market, "workers" are paid according to the value of the output they
produce (Heath). It does not seem right that the college journalist can sell their piece to a paper
for extra cash, or the local band can play for a few dollars at the bar Saturday night, or the biology
major that takes an internship at the school lab can be profitable yet college athletes cannot. Under
the NCAA they are not allowed to make any money of their skill. Any college student should be
able to endorse products (Wilbon). This is why the idea of going to school for free should not be an
argument against paying athletes, because that is not the case and they have earned it.
One last reason college athletes

Paying College Athletes After high school, some students decide to make the decision to go to
college to further their education, earn a degree, have fun, and some, to play sports. College
sporting events bring in money through tickets, jerseys, shirts, and other gear. The money made
for all of these items and expenses go to paying coaches, the school, charities, utilities, and other
expenses a school has to pay to have a sports team. Most college athletes are given scholarships to
allow them not to have to pay for college or anything that comes with the college experience. Some
athletes, that are good enough athletically, do not ever pay for tuition, living expenses, meal plans,
books, and everything else a normal student would have to pay for. For some college athletes that is
not enough. Some college athletes believe that they should get a paycheck based on the money that
the school makes on putting on sporting events that these athletes are participating in. Other college
athletes are satisfied with the scholarship given to them and do not seek additional money. Colleges
bring an incredible amount of money by their sport teams alones. According to John Brill, a sports
journalist writer, "College football and basketball generate more than the National Basketball
Association, a total of more than $6 billion yearly." The money made from these sporting events are
not being used correctly which is frustrating many college athletes. The money that is being

Paying College Athletes Pros And Cons Essay
For years the question or topic of paying college athletes has been given much debate. Countless
studies show that this idea has many negative factors associated with it, which in–return make it
unreasonable. The cons associated with the idea of paying college/amateur athletes include that
many student–athletes already receive scholarships and other benefits, paying college athletes could
detract from the purity of the game, and the process of figuring out how to pay these athletes would
be extremely difficult. Based upon many studies the idea has more consequential cons that outweigh
the potential pros. Even though college athletes aren't able to receive any type of monetary
compensation they receive thousands of dollars in scholarships...show more content...
Although athletes come to play their sports at the next level they are still considered student–athletes
if hundreds of thousands of dollars are given away to a lot of just one and done college players
who are just using college as a gateway to their professional careers how does this growing thing
continue to affect regular students. If continuous money is handed out to athletes then what
percentage is left to give to other unfortunate students that are in need and want to receive a
valuable education. For athletes getting an education to essentially fall back on is in their best
interest, making it to the professional level isn't promised anything could go wrong. After making
the decision to try and it doesn't work out would leave large amounts of money wasted and the
athlete may be stuck without a clue of what to do because they aren't able to turn back and get their
education or continue pursuing their college major. The debate on whether college athletes should
be paid or not has gone on for years and continues to go on now. Many studies show that the idea has
far more consequential cons associated with it than it does pros. Figuring out this on–going debate is
difficult and will take some time to completely figure out and in the end with a debate like this no
one will be fully satisfied as with an issue like this you can't please

The college athletes of their respective sports today, have the opportunity of showcasing their
talents in competition on local and national programming on a regular basis which has lately
brought attention this controversy, paying college athletes. The issue was brought on by the
athletes over time, then caught onto coaches, sports columnists, and fans. The athletes dedicate
themselves to the sport to a caliber comparable to the professional tier. The idea of paying the
athletes could be considered as they play major factor in reputation of their schools, as well as
funds for their schools. However most colleges do not have profitable sports teams. Thus, paying
athletes would prove to be a very difficult endeavor and this could destroy...show more content...
They practice, they travel for games, and they represent their school. They also put themselves in
the way of personal injury. In the article, "In Defense of Cheering", by "New York Times" writer,
Jennie Yabroff, she demonstrates just how hard individuals on a cheerleading squad work. "One
member has a broken rib. The other a possible concussion from a nasty fall. A third wraps a
compression bandage around a sprained ankle. They've been practicing day and night, focusing on
their sport to the exclusion of most everything else, and the strain is showing" (Yabroff, p. 524).
These athletes spend a tremendous amount of time and energy preparing to compete. According to
former Nebraska Senator, Ernie Chambers, "[College athletes] are unpaid workers, and in big–time
college athletics, not just football, there are no amateurs, you're a professional. They call it a
scholarship, fees, books, tuition and so forth. What I want is the athletes to have some spendable
money". Advocates argue that they don't necessarily want these students to make large sums of
money, just some spending money.
Although, there are also many benefits to playing college sports that aren't monetary. Yes, student
athletes do get significant financial aid packages, but they also get to experience something more.
When students join a college sports team they form a relationship with people from different areas,

College Athletes Should Get Paid Essay
If you were a college–athlete what would you do if you got paid a tremendous amount of money?
Right now, no college athlete are getting paid for their work, but it is a very strong debate going on
in the country whether they should or not. Many people believe that since they are spending several
hours into their sports, to entertain the world, that they deserve some type of payment. There are
several amounts of pros and cons of paying college athletes, and you have to really "dissect" it and
imagine about their future. From my standpoint, I believe that college–athletes should not be paid
because of the risk of them forgetting about their academics, using their money for non–important
items, and because most of them are "technically" getting paid.
Starting off, if college athletes got paid they would look at their "student–athlete career" as more of a
job, other than academics and one of their hobbies. To extend off, the people that believe that the
athletes should receive payment because of their consistent work, aren't really thinking about what
their purpose is to even be there. It is called "student–athlete" because...show more content...
Anyone could say or think that "no they aren't getting paid," but you have to think about what they
are getting in replacement of a check. First payment in my eyes, is that, I quote "The average NCAA
athlete on scholarship gets, per year, about $10,000" (http://www.marcusfootball.com). Not to
mention the outstandingly–talented students that receive a full–ride (everything paid for). Over the
full four years of playing the sport that is saving approximately $40,000. That amount of money is
tremendous to families and could be very helpful for them. The other way of payment is all of the
popularity and fame they get. The students literally are getting shown on television and are getting
their name known all around the campus, if not the whole

Essays Paying College Athletes

Essays Paying College Athletes

Essays Paying College Athletes

Recommandé

Contenu connexe

Similaire à Essays Paying College Athletes

Similaire à Essays Paying College Athletes(20)

Plus de Paper Writer Service

Plus de Paper Writer Service (20)

Dernier

Dernier(20)

Essays Paying College Athletes