Euthanasia Essay Conclusion

Argumentative Essay On Euthanasia
When people are introduced to something new, they can become skeptical and dismissive.
Especially, if the concept changes the status quo. This applies to the concept of physician assisted
suicides. If the practice becomes common, it will diffuse to other parts of the world. It could change
the whole society and their values concerning life and death. Euthanasia is something that should
legalized but only performed in certain situations.
Euthanasia is the act of either causing death without pain or not being able to avoid death from
happening by natural causes in an individual with a terminal illness or irreversible coma. The
practice is also known as "Physician Assisted Suicide" or PAS. Euthanasia can be voluntary,
non–voluntary, and involuntary.Voluntary euthanasiais when the patient explicitly requests for the
procedure to occur. Non–voluntary euthanasia is when the patient cannot make their own decisions
like a person in a coma. Involuntary euthanasia is performed without the patient's consent at all.
Euthanasia can also be categorized as passive or active. Passive deals with the removal of a life
support system and active involves a doctor or another third party, at the choice of the patient, the
direct use of a lethal dose of a drug on the patient. Moreover, this practice is illegal in all states of
America excluding Oregon, Montana, California, Washington DC, Washington, Vermont, and
Colorado. In the year 1994, "Oregon became the first Jurisdiction in the world to
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Argumentative Essay On Euthanasia
Final Draft
Euthanasia is a controversial contemporary issue discussed in philosophy and bioethics. The debate
has encapsulated regions of the United States and Europe. An array of research has established
evidence of euthanasia, in light of 'treatment' for terminally ill patients and any individual who
wishes to have the right to die. Generally, euthanasia is regarded as, a criminal homicide at the
request of a suffering patient. Individuals who are in favor of euthanasia have expressed reasons for
their passionate support of euthanasia. Researchers have conducted research mainly in the state of
Oregon in which euthanasia has been legalized since 1997, for the past 20–years. Reference is also
made of Washington, Montana, Vermont and Mexico. On the international scale regions in Europe
such as the Netherlands, Belgium and the UK has legalized Physician–assisted suicide. These
countries have become models for others who have shown interest in Euthanasia and want to legalize
Physician–assisted suicide. Research has shed light on the nature of medicine from the perspective
the family members and physicians.
Euthanasia and physician–assisted suicide is a reality for many sick and dying patients. The
researchers aim to inform general population and influence others to join in the argument of the
topic. There are different types of euthanasia, which include non–voluntary euthanasia and voluntary
euthanasia. This paper is a literature review focused on voluntary euthanasia,

Euthanasia: Dying with Dignity Essay
Euthanasia: Dying with Dignity Someday, a loved one may be faced with tough times or a
terrible tragedy that leaves them in pain and agony for the rest of their life. It may not happen
today, tomorrow, or even next month, but it is always a good idea to have a well thought out plan.
A terminal illness could strike at any minute such as Lou Gehrig's disease, or a car accident could
leave someone paralyzed and miserable for the rest of their life. Permitting euthanasia would give the
people the right to die with dignity and give them the option to not have to go through the pain,
suffering, and stressful effects of a terminal illness. The Hippocratic Oath has been a major road
block in legalizing the euthanasia process. Even though the...show more content...
There is also non–voluntary euthanasia which is illegal worldwide because it is the termination of
life in children. The third type of euthanasia is involuntary euthanasia, which World War Two
brought about when the Nazi's built the death camps, also known as concentration camps. Auschwitz
was one of the most common Concentration Camps known for the involuntary euthanasia usage. It
is the voluntary euthanasia that has been around for centuries and has more support. Euthanasia was
dated back to the fifth century BC to the first century AD when the Ancient Greeks and Romans
supported the process. They only used it in cases where the person had prolonged pain and in
complete agony. Even though there was a Hippocratic Oath, stating a doctor can do no harm, they
still went through with the procedure at the request of the patient. As time went on through the
Middle Ages, Christians showed more opposition in the area, so voluntary death became a very rare
practice.
Euthanasia was dropped after the fall of Rome. Thomas Aquinas' arguments on suicide began to
change opinions as well because it was his belief that life was God's gift and suicide violates
God's authority over life. Centuries passed and decades have gone, the topic of euthanasia was still
a tender topic. Ohio enters the years 1995 and 1996; the people tried to push a bill to legalize
euthanasia in the state, but were turned down quickly. It was not until 1915 when Doctor Haiselden

Essay on The Pros and Cons of Euthanasia
Euthanasia, good or bad? In this following article I will be exploring euthanasia in more detail, the
different Christian points of view, the strengths and weaknesses of the euthanasia argument and
finally my point of view on euthanasia and why I believe this.
First of all, what is euthanasia? It is something that not many people think about until they or a friend
or family member is put in a position where they might actually have to consider it. Euthanasia, in
the dictionary, simply is: the action of ending someone's life in a painless way. It seems pretty
simple but in reality it is a lot more complicated, not only for the people involved but for the society
in general as well.
Overall there are four different types of...show more content...
One of the most important pieces of scripture a Christian follows is the 10 commandments and one,
and in my opinion the most important, commandment is "Do not commit murder." (Exodus 20:13)
This raises the question, is euthanasia murder? and in many Christian's view is that if a life is taken
away earlier than God planed then it is murder and therefore many Christian's point of view on
euthanasia is that it is wrong.
Another quotation that supports what I believe is the general view of many Christians around the
world is the idea that God has already planned out our life and knows when the right time to die is.
This is shown in the bible saying "He set the time for birth, and the time for death." (Ecclesiastes 3:2)
and again here: "your days allotted to me, had all been recorded in your book, before any of them
began." (Psalm 139:16)
Both these quotations show, according to the bible, that God has already planned out our life–from
the time that we are born to the time of our death.
The last Christian point of view is also shown through the bible saying "You created every part of
me, you put me together in my mother's womb." (Psalms 139:13)
This quotation is saying that God created everything about us and not only is linked with the point
of view above saying that God has already planned out our lives but is also linked with the idea that
God created us and chose when we were born so he should

Essay on Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia
Assisted suicide brings a debate that involves professional, legal and ethical issues about the value
of the liberty versus the value of life. However, before conceive an opinion about this topic is
necessary know deeply its concept. Assisted suicide is known as the act of ending with the life of a
terminal illness patients for end with their insupportable pain. Unlike euthanasia, the decision is not
made by the doctor and their families, but by the patient. Therefore, doctors should be able to assist
the suicide of their patients without being accused of committing a criminal offense. This
conception is supported by three points of view. The first point defenses the autonomy of people,
which covers the right of people to make decision...show more content...
In conclusion, assisted suicide is supported by the right of people to make decision about their life
provided the patient is in the right mental state to do it.
Another reason to legalize assisted suicide is the empathy for our fellow. For some people who
suffer chronic pain or terminal illnesses, suicide is a more ethical and respectable solution than
suffer great pain until the day of their death, whereby people should have the obligation to relieve
their suffering and respect their dignity. Even if take a life should be considered immoral, let
patients suffer during the remaining time of life, with no hope of a better future or alleviating the
pain will end is inhumane. People judge assisted suicide according to how much pain and suffering
patient are suffering. However, there are differences between pain and suffering. While pain is an
objective concept that can be measured, suffering is a subjective idea that cannot be measured
(Ezekiel, 1999). The impossibility to measure the level of suffering open another question of how to
know if assisted suicide is justified when only the patient know his grade of suffering. In this
instance, the weight relapses in the patient decision again. Allowing assisted suicide society is
preventing future terrible experiences that will convert the last days of patient life in torture. Studies
of

Euthanasia Essay
Here is another essay for you to use! It's alittle screwed up, but perhaps you can do something
with it. It was a lot worse than this, it had strange marks all over it and the paragraphs were
everywhere. I fixed it a bit, but I would go crazy if I stared at a computer screen any more!!!!
Euthanasia, is one of the most controversial issues of our time.
This diver issue raises many questions such as: how should decisions be made, and by whom? What
should be determined as a matter of law and what left a matter of discretion and judgment? Should
those who want to die, or who are in a "persistent vegetative state" be allowed to die
voluntarily? Who should decide: the patient, the physician, the courts, or the families? The...show
more content...
"Wickett, The Right To Die (Harper & Row, Publishers,1986) p. 109. Paul D. Simmons
declares bluntly that "it is harder morally to justify letting somebody die a slow and ugly
death, dehumanized, than it is to justify helping him to escape from such misery.
Samuel Gorovitz, Drawing The Line: Life, Death, and Ethical Choices in an American Hospital
(Oxford University Press, 1991) p.113.В® Some very prominent people are making packs with
friends or relatives that specify that either will help the other die when life becomes desperate
from pain or tragic accident. Families and physicians feel a variety of powerful emotions when
dealing with a patient dying a slow and agonizing death. Certainly they wish that the pain were
relieved and that health restored; that the patient not die but go on living and sharing concerns and
joys together. "When the illness is terminal and there is no hope of relief or recovery,
however, death is often desired for the patient as God's appointed way to relieve suffering."
Paul D.
Simmons, Birth and Death: Bioethical Decision Making (The Westminster Press, 1986) p.116. Mr.
Sorestad, my junior high teacher, shared his experience at the death of his beloved wife after her
prolonged battle with breast cancer. She had deteriorated physically and mentally practically beyond

Euthanisa Outline
SAMPLE PERSUASIVE OUTLINE – AVERAGE Student Y February 17, 2005 Section AY Topic:
Euthanasia Goal: To persuade the audience that physician–assisted suicide, which is a subset
category of euthanasia, should be a legal option. Thesis: All terminally ill patients or individuals in
chronic severe pain should have the option of a peaceful and quick death to minimize suffering.
Introduction A.Attention Gaining Device: On November 23, 2000 my mother passed away. She had
terminal ovarian cancer, but that was not the cause of her death. B.Significance for this audience:
There are so many terminal illnesses in the world, that there is a significant chance that you will at
some point know someone, if you do not already, who is...show more content...
B. I disagree with this assertion and argue that there is no evidence for a decrease in care. C.
While opponents reason that the option of euthanasia will lead to hospitals to restrict care to
terminally ill patients, the evidence indicates otherwise. 1. In actuality, hospice utilization will not
decrease as patients choose assisted dying. 2. In Oregon, where assisted suicide is legal, hospice
referrals have doubled. D. Rather than supporting the claim that euthanasia will decrease care, there
is evidence for an increase in care when we finally begin talking about death as a natural part of life
that can be ended consciously. Transition: Since hospice care is so widely used and hospice
assistants can accelerate the patient's death through terminal sedation and dehydration, you might
argue that there is no need for a law permitting doctor–assisted suicide. Conclusion A.Review of main
points: I have gone over some of the major moral and societal concerns you may have regarding the
legalization of euthanasia. B.Restate thesis: I have shown that those concerns are not necessary.
C.Restate significance: Something needs to be done. Is prolonged suffering the most compassionate
way to end a life? D.Concluding device: I know

Essay Pro Euthanasia
When someone is inevitably dying and in inexplicable pain is it really a crime to grant their wishes
and end their suffering? As of right now euthanasia is illegal in many countries and is a very
controversial topic. Is it compassion for the patient helping them in ending their life or murder? The
doctor is not giving death as an option, it is the patients choice and even where it is legal there are
many rules. Euthanasia should not be considered a crime because the patient is not being murdered;
they are having their suffering end in a painless, humane way out of compassion for the patient and
their family.
Euthanasia is defined by the World Book Millennium 2000 encyclopaedia as, "the practise of
painlessly ending the lives of people...show more content...
The reason to legalize euthanasia is clear, these people need to have the choice to die with dignity.
Dr. Jack Kevorkian more commonly known as Dr. Death is greatly known for his opinion that
euthanasia should be legalized and his work with patients seeking help. He was very important in
showing euthanasia and voicing his opinion on the subject so the public could not ignore the
importance of the matter. Dr. Kevorkian was said to have been involved with 130 suicides by
patients who wanted to end their own lives (Nicol and Wylie 17). He had two machines he used to
help the patients, one an injection and the other a mask, however both machines were operated by
the patient and although Dr. Kevorkian was taken to court many times for these he was not
convicted because the patient was in control. He was very careful as to not actually commit the act
himself until he was contacted by Thomas Youk, a young with Lou Gheric's disease; Lou Gheric's
disease is when the muscle stop working and eventually the patient chokes to death. Tom's condition
prevented him from actually operating the machines and therefore Dr. Kevorkian decided that he
would operate the machine himself because he cared greatly about all his patients and could not let
Tom live in his constant fear (Nicol and Wylie 11). Dr. Kevorkian taped Tom's wishes and then
himself hooking up the machine and pushing the button to inject the drugs. He then proceed to

The Morality Of Euthanasia By James Rachels
Student: Gretel Herrera–Martinez
Panther ID: 3339147
Active Euthanasia
Does James Rachels in "The Morality of Euthanasia" successfully argue that in at least some cases
active euthanasia is morally acceptable? Explain his view and respond to it.
In this essay, we are going to analyze the main ideas included in "The Morality of Euthanasia" by
James Rachels to provide a response to the following question: Does James Rachels in "The
Morality of Euthanasia" successfully argue that in at least some cases active euthanasia is morally
acceptable?
Having read and analyzed this article in my opinion Mr. James Rachels successfully argues that in
at least some cases active euthanasia is morally acceptable. First of all and to better understand the
position of the author we need to understand the principal concepts involved in this article. We need
to define euthanasia and classify the different types of euthanasia. Euthanasia is considered as a good
death, it is the act or omission that accelerates the death of a patient sick with no cure, with or
without their approval (as in the case of people in a coma), with the intention of stopping suffering
and pain. Euthanasia is associated with the end of life to stop or avoid suffering.
Today, the fact that euthanasia is morality or immorality permissible is a very controversial issue
debated and discussed by doctors and philosophers. This point generated a controversial debate. The
discussion takes into account the ethics of medical

Euthanasia Position Paper
Assisted Suicide, mercy killing, euthanasia; whatever you call it or however we justified it is killing
by all means. Euthanasia is a practice of ending a life to release an individual from an incurable
disease or intolerable suffering. It is an action which brings intentional death to a patient. In the case
of the elderly cancer patient, the family and the patient does not know whether or not to commit
euthanasia. The author response in this case, is that the elderly cancer patient should not go for
euthanasia, since she has a biographical life. He came to the right conclusion, even though he did not
have a valid argument. The author should have advised the patient not to commit euthanasia by
using the three main arguments against...show more content...
This means if one lost his or her biographical life, they have the right to commit euthanasia. I
disagree with the author on that people might have the right to euthanasia. The three most common
arguments against euthanasia are the Bible from a Christian prospective, the effective pain
management, and the fear of abuse if euthanasia were legalized.
One of the biggest arguments against euthanasia is the religious argument, which was not
mentioned by the author. Most religious groups especially Christianity goes against euthanasia.
The practice of euthanasia is wrong because it violates the principle that life is given by God.
God doesn't approve of "hands that shed innocent blood". Life comes from God. It is God's
decision to give life and to take it away. In the Bible, "shedding innocent blood" is called murder. The
death of King Sol is an example of euthanasia. Saul did not want the philistines to find him alive.
He knew they would torture him. He asked his solider to kill him. When the solider refused, Sol
fell on his own sword and died. Sol committed suicide, but he did it to avoid suffering. He murdered
himself and therefore was guilty of sin. Not all suffering is bad. Even though one may not always
understand why he/she suffers, some good can come from it.
The apostle Paul understood this. He had a "thorn in the flesh" he asked God to remove, but he
realized afterward that it was for his good.

Research Paper on Euthanasia
Research Paper on Euthanasia
Paper Presented to
Professor
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction....................................................................1
Eight Arguments to Consider................................................2
The Right to Die...............................................................2
Patient Suffering................................................................3
Slippery Slope to Legalized Murder.........................................4
Hippocratic Oath and Prohibition of Killing...............................5
Government Involvement.....................................................5
Palliative Care..................................................................6
Healthcare Spending Implications...........................................7
Value of Life....................................................................7
Conclusion......................................................................8
Works Cited....................................................................9
EUTHANASIA – The Right to Choose or a Slippery Slope...show more content...
A state's categorical ban on physician assistance to suicide –– as applied to competent, terminally ill
patients who wish to avoid unendurable pain and hasten inevitable death –– substantially interferes
with this protected liberty interest and cannot be sustained." – ACLU [3] On the other hand is
someone who is in the situation of confronting a terminal illness or who has been in unbearable
pain for a protracted period of time able to make such a decision. Everyone has been in pain in their
life and thought about what it would be like to face a life threatening illness, but they are thinking
about it when they are not in that situation. With this calm state of mind one could more rationally

make a life and death decision, but once in those circumstances would anyone be clear enough to
decide to end their life?
Patient Suffering Pro Euthanasia advocates believe that nobody should have to suffer long,
painful, and hopeless circumstances if they don't want to. Why should the state be allowed to
keep someone alive who is in pain and has no hope of recovery? People in a persistent vegetative
state, and people who have a terminal illness all deal with a life of intense pain, decreased quality
of life, a sense of hopelessness. If they can choose to die and there is no hope of a meaningful
recovery why should they not be allowed to end that suffering, why does a government have the right
to stop them and

Euthanasia Essay examples
Euthanasia is often called "mercy killing". It is intentionally making someone die, rather than
allowing that person to die naturally. It is sometimes the act of ending someone's life, who is
terminally ill, or is suffering in severe pain. Euthanasia is mostly illegal in the world today.
Euthanasia can be considered a form of suicide, if the person afflicted with the problem actively
does it. The person volunteering to commit the act to that person can also consider it a form of
murder.
The positive side of Euthanasia is that it ends a person's suffering in this world. Many physicians and
psychiatrists believe that it may a humane act. From a virtue ethics point of view, it may be
appropriate. What we seek in human existence is to be...show more content...
The benefits are numerous in that the person euthanized would cease suffering, and the families
would begin the healing process from grief and/or depression from the situation.
From Mill's perspective, the person volunteering for euthanasia has a liberty to do what he/she
wants. Mill has written that if the person does not cause harm to others, it is the person's right, or
liberty, to do what they please. If a person wants euthanasia, then that person has the sole liberties to
choose such an act, and depart society and life. Nobody is being other than the person wishing it,
and it is a volunteered act.
Brandt argues for approval of euthanasia, but killing human beings is wrong, because it injures that
person and goes against the preferences of self–preservation. However, Brandt says that the above is
not present in the issue of euthanasia, so it may be permissible. Brandt says that not all killing is
injury, so not all killing is wrong. One should pay attention to one's expressed wishes he says.
Euthanasia could be considered doing a person a favor, because you cannot injure something if you
are relieving it of pain.
The negative side of euthanasia is that it goes against natural law ethics, because we do not let
nature take its course. We are disturbing what is occurring or happening naturally to the person.
Every person has a natural inclination to continue living. It is also said

Euthanasia Ends Suffering Essay examples
Euthanasia Ends Suffering
Death is deeply personal, generally feared, and wholly inescapable, but medical technology now
can prolong our biological existence virtually indefinitely, and, with these advances, comes the
question of whether we should pursue the extension of life in all cases. Most people would agree
that, under certain circumstances, it would be preferable to cease our hold on life. Nearly everyone
can agree that there are situations when terminally ill patients have the right to call for a halt to
life–extending treatments, and that their physicians will have the moral obligation to comply. What
appears to be quite difficult for us as a society to come to terms with is the thought that someone
would...show more content...
Perry was kept alive long enough for his critical injuries to heal, allowing him to recover the
ability to breath unassisted once weaned off a respirator. This means that he will continue to live, if
one can call his existence living, for years to come. Perry's mother, who refused the suggestion of
"letting him die" while her son was comatose, acknowledges that he would not have wanted to live
in his present condition. She refused the suggestion of letting him die while he was comatose, by her
own admission, because she could not accept the guilt she felt at the thought of his slow death from
starvation (which is the commonly accepted, and legally permissible, form of passive euthanasia).
Had the more humane option of active euthanasia been available, she would have chosen that path
for her son. When one sees Perry, one has to ask in whose best interest was it that he was saved?
What possible good can be said to have been achieved in prolonging the existence of someone who
can no longer even realize what the word "life" means? Our society needs to examine the reason
why one type of euthanasia is condoned where another form, often less brutal, is refused. Certain
clarifications are necessary before discussion can begin on whether there truly is a moral difference

In doctor helped suicide, the choice to end a tolerant's life is given to a patient learning of the
persistent's aim. Dissimilar to killing, in doctor helped suicide, somebody makes passing accessible,
yet does not specifically regulate the demise (Broeckaert 1). Willful extermination is executing
somebody who is experiencing a torment, sickness or damage. Willful extermination implies that
somebody other than the patient confers an activity with the expectation to end the tolerant's life, for
instance infusing a patient with a deadly dosage of pharmaceutical. Patients may agree to Euthanasia
which is intentional Euthanasia, deny Euthanasia which is automatic Euthanasia, or be not able to
agree to Euthanasia which is non deliberate Euthanasia (Walsh 1)....show more content...
Laws oblige that a doctor should just analyze an evil patient that has a future of six months or less
and a second specialist then must concur with the conclusion (Worsnop, 1). Patients must demand
the remedy twice verbally and once in composed structure with a holding up time of no less than two
weeks between the first and last demand (Worsnop, 1). In conclusion the specialist who composes the
medicine must accept the patient is rationally equipped to settle on the choice. The law additionally
obliges that patients have the capacity to take the pills all alone (Worsnop, 1). I accept that it is vital
to listen to and recognize the patient when they express enduring, misery, and gloom. I accept that
doctor helped and additionally deliberate Euthanasia ought to be

Euthanasia Essay : Euthanasia And Euthanasia
This is why Euthanasia is important and summarizing the research that I found on Euthanasia.
Euthanasia is important because there is a lot of arguments about Euthanasia. Some people support it
and some people do not support Euthanasia (Euthanasia and assisted suicide– Arguments).
Euthanasia allows people to be free from physical pain. It is the hastening of death of a patient to
prevent further sufferings (Euthanasia Revisited). The religious argument states God chooses when
human life ends. Euthanasia also causes mental suffering because they are in physical pain or they
are experiencing with terminal illness. It is a debatable issue. There are many different opinions on
Euthanasia. The topic that I am researching is Euthanasia. There are many different arguments for
and against Euthanasia. The four main types of arguments used by people who are against
Euthanasia are the religious argument, the 'slippery slope' argument, the medical ethics argument,
and the alternative argument (Euthanasia and assisted suicide–Argument. The pragmatic argument
and the ethical argument are the two main types of arguments used to support the practice of
Euthanasia and assisted suicide (Euthanasia and assisted suicide– Argument. The ethical argument is
that people should have the freedom of choice to say if they want euthanasia or not. The pragmatic
argument is for euthanasia. . In addition, that is the definition of the topic. This is what makes the
topic interesting. What makes this topic

Thesis Statement Against Euthanasia
Title: Argue Against Euthanasia
Thesis Statement: The Philippine should not allow Euthanasia because it is form of murder
Problem: Should we allow Euthanasia in the Philippines?
Answer: No
1.Introduction
1.1 Argue against Euthanasia without Resorting to "Because God doesn't like it."
2.Against Euthanasia
2.1 killing of an innocent man or child.
2.2 it morally questionable to our society
3.Resorting to Religious Belief
3.1 god has the rights
3.2 only god may decide when we will die.
4. Problems
4.1 does not solve the problem
4.2 suffering
5. Conclusion
5.1 I conclude that we should not legalized the Euthanasia here in the Philippines.
Introduction:
People all knows that Euthanasia is the act of killing someone who is very sick...show more content...
All faith's offer meaning and explanations for death and dying; faiths try to find a place for death
and dying within human experience. God gives people life, so only god has the right to talk it away.
Human lives are important because God created them, Therefore human should be protected and
preserved whatever happens and therefore we shouldn't interfere with God's plans by shortening
human lives and the catholics are disapprove of Euthanasia. Religions are opposed to euthanasia for
a number of

Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia is the practice of ending a life to release an individual from suffering an incurable
disease or intolerable pain. Having to lay in bed twenty–four hours a day is no way to live a life.
People that suffer from a serious illness should have the right to die by euthanasia. In
1991, a national telephone survey was conducted which posed the question, "If you were terminally
ill, what would you want for yourself?"
Fifty–two percent of one thousand four in the US said that they'd consider assisted suicide or
euthanasia. Among the reasons cited were that the people wouldn't want to burden others, live in
pain, or be dependent on machines. All Americans have the right to die because the
Constitution grants us the...show more content...
As Americans, people have the right to pursue happiness. A person's only way to be happy may be
death, so why shouldn't they be able to be happy. Having the right to be happy is an American right,
even if it means death.
There are those who argue that if euthanasia becomes legal it will become abused and overused.
This is a good point, however, if we determine the use on a case by case basis this wont be a problem.
People also argue that it is against religion. People believe, "Only God can give life and only God
should take it away." But I ask, "Why would
God prolong such pain and suffering?" Jesus Christ suffered and died on a cross, would he want to
see his people go through suffering like he had to?
So should one have the right to die? I feel a person is entitled to that choice. The word 'euthanasia'
come from the Greek––eu, meaning good, and thanatos, meaning death. So the word euthanasia
means
"good death" by it's origins. Euthanasia is a way of putting an end to a person's life in which they
are suffering or totally dependent on others or machines. Having the right to die, should become
legal so many suffering people can end their pain legally. Sometimes euthanasia serves the interest
of everyone concerned and is the best choice for the terminally ill person. It relieves the person of
unbearable pain and provides a merciful and dignified end to their life. It also relieves the terrible
emotional strain on

Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia – Response to Anti Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia is a topic that provokes as much controversy as capital punishment, primarily because it
is irreversible. The question of euthanasia being right or wrong is one that most would prefer left
alone. However, recent publicity on changes to existing laws has ignited considerable discussion and
has forced open the door to a much wider audience. The issues related to direct euthanasia have
raised many questions in my mind, to which I am still searching for answers. I believe it is
necessary to consider arguments, both, for and against, in order to come to any conclusion. In this
paper I will address Brian Clowes' article in the "Pro–Life Activist's Encyclopedia",
located on the...show more content...
Yet, his persistent use of medical cases where patients were classified as irreversibly comatose
and where all decisions regarding their continual treatment were made by others, neglects to
recognize the numerous cases of terminally ill patients, who simply ask for the right to control
their own destiny and to die with dignity. His use of extreme cases, all of which were found in
'National Right to Life News', gives the reader a distorted picture and neglects the many types of
cases where the prolonging of life would be cruel, inhumane and immoral. (Johnstone, 1994:353)
EUTHANASIA SETS A BAD EXAMPLE? I would ask what kind of example are we giving our
young by prolonging life at whatever cost to the person? Is quantity of life always the best option? Is
the taking of human life always wrong? In the 18th century William Mitford, an English historian
stated "Men fear death, as if unquestionably the greatess evil, and yet no man knows that it
may not be the greatest good." (Bradley, Daniels & Jones, 1969:194) Here the author
compares the act of suicide among the young with the act of euthanasia with the terminally ill. He
believes, in making euthanasia an acceptable social practice, it will inevitably have negative
repercussions on the rest of society. The writer argues that by condoning euthanasia, we condone

Ethics of Euthanasia Essay
As patients come closer to the end of their lives, certain organs stop performing as well as they use
to. People are unable to do simple tasks like putting on clothes, going to the restroom without
assistance, eat on our own, and sometimes even breathe without the help of a machine. Needing to
depend on someone for everything suddenly brings feelings of helplessness much like an infant
feels. It is easy to see why some patients with terminal illnesses would seek any type of relief from
this hardship, even if that relief is suicide. Euthanasia or assisted suicide is where a physician would
give a patient an aid in dying. "Assisted suicide is a controversial medical and ethical issue based on
the question of whether, in certain situations,...show more content...
Whether murder is done in a peaceful, non painful way or in a very gruesome, unimaginable way,
it is still considered murder. Physicians have no way of knowing 'what is best for the patient'
especially if that patient's terminal illness prevents them from speaking. Not only is assisted
suicide considered murder, it also goes against Physicians' Hippocratic Oath. "Hippocratic Oath:
An oath (or promise) all physicians must swear to uphold, regarding the ethical practices of the
medical profession" (Lee). By allowing doctors to stray from this oath, it will be easier for them to
aid in or carry out assisted suicides when it will never be entirely necessary for them to consider the
option. "In 2005, Texas doctors removed two patients from life support without advanced directions
and against the wishes of the patient's family" (Pawlick). By not legalizing assisted suicides, families
will be able to decide when their family member is physically unable to continue with the provided
treatments, but only when the patient themselves can no longer communicate their wishes and no
document stating how they should go about the situation has been left in their families possession.
Ethical issues are not the only problem. Some argue that euthanasia also creates issues from a legal
perspective. "One legal question is whether assisted suicide violates the Controlled Substances Act, a
federal law governing the distribution of drugs" (Lee). Such

Thesis Statement On Euthanasia
ROOTS MILLENIUM SCHOOLS
Euthanasia: Interfering with life and death?
Amal Sikandar Ranjha
Table of Contents
1.Introduction.................................................................... 3
2.Thesis............................................................................... 4
3.Types of euthanasia....................................................... 4
4.Literature........................................................................ 5
5.Conclusion....................................................................... 7
6.Acknowledgements........................................................ 7 Introduction
From cloning to genetically modified food to designer babies, humans have long been known to
interfere with the way nature does things; humans have been modifying genes and improving the
outlook in the pretext that it improves the quality of our lives. Humans also have a long history of
interfering with and trying to control the more divine...show more content...
The prevalent human ethics have made this topic enormous and highly controversial to its core.
People around the globe have opposing views as to what Euthanasia is, and whether it should be
allowed or should the practitioners of euthanasia be punished. The National Health Service in the
UK has declared it illegal to help someone take their life whatever the circumstances may be.
The one name that comes up most frequently when talking about Euthanasia is Dr. Jack Kevorkian,
also sometimes referred to as Dr. Death. He made it his mission to travel across the United States
of America, at his own expense, to help the people who considered that their lives were not worth
living anymore and assist them in committing suicide. Most of the times, due to extensive suffering,
most patients simply give up; with no hope left, they start to believe that the only way out of
interminable pain and discomfort is to give up on their lives. Utter hopelessness makes them highly
vulnerable and at the same time impulsive too. So, they easily fall victim to the temptation of ending
up their own lives with just little assistance from people like Dr.

Euthanasia Essay Conclusion

Recommandé

Recommandé

Contenu connexe

Plus de Paper Writer Service

Plus de Paper Writer Service (20)

Dernier

Dernier (20)

Euthanasia Essay Conclusion