Cons Of Death Penalty Essay

Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty Essay
Should the death penalty be legal? This simple question sparks a lot of controversy and is the topic
of many debates. For countries like China and Saudi Arabia, they say yes. But, for the United States,
only about 62% of people agree. A number of execution methods have been used such as firing
squad, hanging, electrocution, and most recently, lethal injection. Both Dave Anderson and Robert
Blecker are supporters of the death penalty, but they both are not necessarily for the current
execution methods available. Nick Gillespie and Jeffrey Toobin are against the death penalty, stating
that it is not only immoral, but is expensive and violates the Eighth Amendment. While both sides of
this debate provide reasonable arguments, neither side contributes enough to win the debate. Since
1973, 144 people that were on death row have be executed. The supporters of the death penalty
believe that by executing "the worst of the worst" will decrease crime, provide substantial
punishments, and promote happiness and safety throughout the country. Supporters are trying to
find solutions to legalize the death penalty in the United States that is not considered cruel and
unusual punishment, while still providing justice for the victims and their families. "Most of the
arguments against the death penalty; those of inherent unfairness and bias towards the poor or racial
minorities or the devastating potential for mistaken execution are both fallacious and misleading"
(Anderson 2016). Dave
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The death penalty, a constant source of controversy and divided opinion, is the punishment of death
given to criminals who commit severe crimes. As the severity of crimes that attract the death penalty
is debatable, so is its correctness and effectiveness. The justice system is based upon punishment for
crimes committed with emphasis on the punishment fitting the crime. Countries such as China and
Singapore have used it to punish drug traffickers and therefore fuelled debate on how fitting the
punishment is in such cases. For all it aims to achieve, the death penalty has well documented
weaknesses, not least of which is its brutality and finality, and it is these frailties that lead to the calls
for its abolishment. The death penalty is...show more content...
For the death sentence to be issued, numerous stages of a long process seek to verify the guilt of the
accused. While these stages seek to rule out reasonable doubt, common among these stages is human
involvement and thus the likelihood of error that human beings are susceptible to. Not just error
though, opinions and perceptions of jurors come into play and this does little to ensure that the risk
of an innocent person being sentenced to death is alleviated. Despite the best efforts of pro–death
penalty activists to overplay the role of modern methods such as DNA testing in evidence validity
(Joe Messerli balancedpolitics.org), it still does not rule out the chance of an innocent life being
taken. Does what the death penalty aim to achieve outweigh the choice to overlook risk of loss of
innocent life? It would if the death penalty was the only way to achieve justice, but it is not. Life
imprisonment without parole is just as effective, but it is does not have the yoke of finality that the
death penalty has since appeals could be made in light of new evidence that could prove innocence.
One key argument brought up in support of the death penalty is that it offers retribution especially for
murder cases. This argument was backed heavily by New York law professor, Robert Blecker, who
claimed that the punishment had to be painful in proportion to the crime. "It would be unfair that
those

The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty
Death Penalty Death penalty is when a government or state executes someone, usually but not
always because they have committed a serious crime. Executions in most countries have become
rarer than in recent centuries. The death penalty is a debatable and controversial topic. About one
third of the countries in the world have laws that allow the death penalty. 75 countries have gotten
rid of the capital punishment (death penalty) for all crimes. Most of the countries that have a death
penalty law use it on murderers, and for other serious crimes such as rape or terrorism. Other
countries especially ones with Authoritarian or Totalitarian governments, however, also use it for
smaller crimes like theft, drugs, or for saying bad things about...show more content...
Some people also believe that the execution should not be public but it should surely be part of the
public record. Those who support the death penalty debate that the punishment offers retribution for
victims of murder and is more cost efficient than offering life sentences in prison and also bring
closure to their loved ones as well. Supporters of the death penalty say it is an important tool for
preserving law and order, deters crime, and costs less than life imprisonment. On the other side,
opponents often argue that innocent people are sometimes executed and that the main motive is
revenge, not true justice. Opponents of this punishment say it has no discouraging effect on crime
and it wrongly gives governments the power to take a human life, and maintains social injustices
by mistargeting people of color and people who cannot afford good attorneys. They say lifetime
jail sentences are a more severe and less expensive punishment than death. These people who are
against capital punishment are not because of sympathy for criminals but because it doesn't reduce
crime, costs taxpayers much more than life sentences, is more emotionally draining for the
families of victims than life in prison without parole and worst of all, risks executions of innocent
people. The system can make tragic mistakes. As of now, 157 wrongly convicted people on death
row have been killed. We'll never know for sure how many people have been executed for crimes
they didn't

Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty
Death Penalty The Death Penalty: killing people that kill people to show people that killing people
is wrong. Use of the death penalty in the United States has always been controversial. Some people
believe that it is a fair system in which criminals pay for the crimes they committed and to prevent
future crimes. While others believe that it is a broken system, often punishing innocent civilians to a
cruel and inhumane death.
Furthermore, the method in which the death penalty is executed is a clear violation of a human rights
and is unconstitutional. The eighth amendment of Constitution of United States of America states,
"Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments
inflicted." ("Amendment...show more content...
In fact, it is more expensive as compared to when containing the same criminal inside the prison for
life. The costs involve the expenses acquired before and during the trial. It involves a nonstop flow
of legal wrangling, appeals and more. ("Death Penalty Pros and Cons.") Carrying out a single death
sentence for a criminal costs two to five times more than that putting that same criminal in prison for
the rest of his or her life. This is due to the costs, which include, but are not limited to, investigation
costs, cost of processing evidence, substantial lawyer fees, amount of trials, number of extensive
appeals, substantial security costs, and incarceration costs. Prices also continue to rise after the
criminal is sentenced to the death penalty, because it costs more to house death row inmates, who
are held in segregated sections, in individual cells, with guards delivering everything to them. Thus,
imprisoning criminals for life is tens of millions of dollars cheaper than to execute them. ("Pros &
Cons: Death

The United States justice system uses many methods of punishment on lawbreakers and criminals.
These include jail time, community service, paroles, fines, and the most shocking, the death
penalty. The death penalty, also referred to as capital punishment, was first introduced in the form
of hanging hundreds of years ago when America was first established. Now, the most common way
of execution proves to be death by lethal injection. For hundreds of years, people have argued over
whether or not the general idea of capital punishment stands morally correct. Many have also
debated if anyone holds the right to end another's life. The death penalty, morally wrong and faulty,
does not save lives but unnecessarily ruins and ends them.
Everyone...show more content...
Ringo, who committed his crime July of 1998, was executed on September 10, 2014. Ringo, along
with an accomplice, previously robbed a restaurant and fatally shot Joanna Baysinger and Dennis
Poyser. In his conclusion, Muhlhausen states the execution of Ringo "may just save the lives of
several innocents" (Muhlhausen). He fails to mention, however, exactly how this death prevented
more. Ringo already spent about sixteen years in prison without problems, so prison contained him
his murderous ways just fine. Lives can be saved in absence of execution. The containment of
criminals, rather than the death of, still prevents innocents from losing their lives. Execution may
prevent deaths just as well as jail time, but only with the heavy cost of another human being's life.
The nation of America divides when it comes to capital punishment. Just thirty–one of fifty states
still use the death penalty. Two years ago, August 13, the state of Connecticut ruled the death penalty
unconstitutional. The court discussed the morality and the discriminatory cases of capital
punishment (Caplan). Race can be a big factor when it comes to capital punishment, as a minority is
about six times more likely to receive the death penalty than a white defendant. Many also argue
against capital punishment because they feel the death penalty gives criminals an easy way out.
Death can be easier and quicker than a life sentence or community

Clayton GorskiDeath Penalty
The death penalty has been a debated topic for decades. Many people believe that it serves justice
to the person being executed, while others think that it does no good for either party. However, I
believe the three most outstanding topics surround the death penalty are the cost of death vs. life in
prison, attorney quality, and irrevocable mistakes.
The first topic surrounding the death penalty is the cost of death vs. life in prison. This is a big
issue because most people believe that the death penalty is a more cost effective decision than
spending life in prison, but that may have been the case many years ago when deaths were swift.
Today, prisoners have to go to...show more content...
What I consider to be a pro of the attorney quality is that state governments and courts are starting to
recognize the flaws within the death penalty system. A major con of attorney quality is that
prisoners cannot afford their own attorneys, they are appointed one. Generally the attorneys that are
appointed to prisoners are newer attorneys with very little experience, or just bad attorneys. This
most of the time leads to the defendants being executed innocent or not.
The last topic surrounding the death penalty are the irrevocable mistakes made by judges. This has
become a big issue within the last twenty years because the number of appeal cases that found the
defendant was innocent, and saved from the death penalty was enough to put the topic into review.
Pros of this is there has been a recognition to have higher standard for convicting someone of the
death penalty. Another pro is that there have been organizations like the innocence project to help
victims convicted of crimes they haven't committed. These organizations also shed light on prisoners
on death row and in the regular prison population, to review their cases and come to a better
sentence. With these reviews many people across the nation have be set free, but without a deeper
look into their cases they would most likely still be sitting in prison. A con of this is the fact that
someone could be sentenced to death that is innocent.

In the united states of American 60 percent of African Americans seem to be currently on the
federal death row that's a con and a pro, is common sense, lately bolstered by stats tells us that the
death penalty deter murder. People fear nothing more than death. This information came from
procon.org irrevocable mistakes since the reinstatement of the new age death penalty 87 people
have been freed from death row, later on they were proven innocent. That is a demonstrated error
rate of 1 innocent person for every seven executed. Cost of death vs life in prison death penalty case
is expensive at least two million per case, But that's up front right away, But life without parole case
state at one million, But even over time the cost will go up...show more content...
The reality in the 21st century is startlingly different the past few decades have seen the
importance's of public defender systems that in many cases rival some of the best lawyers retained
on the low many giant law firms in large cities across America not only provide pro–bono counsel in
capital cases, but also offer friendship to lawyers whose sole job is to promote in indigent capital
defense. Next who pays the ultimate penalty for crimes? The poor. Who gets the death penalty? The
poor. After all the talk that goes on in courtroom getting the gathers in the end when the net is cast
out it is the poor people who get the death penalty? It has everything to do with the kind of defense.
That's why you'll never see a Jerremy Webster on death row. As the saying goes capital punishment
means those without the capital get the punishment, And let's start on doctors at executions and the
pros and cons accepting capital punish in the worst way principle means accepting it in practice,
whether by the hand of a doctor or

The Death Penalty: Pros and Cons Essay
The Death Penalty. Immoral or moral; just or unjust? These are just a few of the questions people
ask themselves when debating the Death Penalty which is arguably the most controversial topic of
the United States today. Every time these words come up, we start yelling out our opinions on what
we feel is right. Pro death penalty people shout deterrence across the room while the anti death
penalty supporters shout about potentially killing an innocent man; some argue that is just and the
murders deserve their punishment while others say we are murdering people too if we kill the
suspect. Being one of the seventy– four countries that carry out the capital punishment, the United
States is currently fourth in executions per year. Beyond this,...show more content...
40 percent of the people on death row in 2007 were African Americans although whites committed
more murders. The former mayor of Maryland, Mister Martin O'Malley brought up another
controversial discussion supporting abolishment s well stating that if we stopped the death penalty,
"$22.4 million could pay for 500 additional police officers or provide drug treatment for 10,000 of
our addicted neighbors. Unlike the death penalty, these are investments that save lives and prevent
violent crime"
There are often mistakes made that falsely determine an individual's sentence. Sloppy police work
and loss of documents are examples of careless errors. There is also some room for error with
determining the results of a DNA sample that do not fall under the human error category. Many
times there may not be ample DNA samples at a crime scene. Only a fraction of crimes reveal DNA.
Drive–by shootings and bombings often do not provide DNA for investigation purposes. "There is a
public perception that DNA is the cure–all for these kinds of mistakes. DNA is not the whole
answer." (Dieter, Richard) Eye witnesses cannot solely and accurately determine a person's fate 100
percent of the time. There are numerous amounts of cases in which those found guilty were indeed
later found innocent. Many times, these individuals have already served time in jail. Many argue
that the time inmates spend in

The Death Penalty: Pros and Cons In this paper I will be discussing everything you need to know
about the death penalty such as its pros and cons. While the innocent can be killed, the death
penalty has its pros because it prevents them from killing again if they are released or have
escaped from prison, it helps overpopulated prisons, and it can help victims' families get justice
and closure. Not only can the innocent be killed, but in the past the death penalty was very
inhumane. To some its feels right but to others they feel like 2 wrongs don't make a right. Most
people think that the defendant deserves the death penalty, but what does the defendants' family
think? First, the death penalty has its ups and downs because they could kill again if the criminal is
released or if he or she escapes prison. There have been cases where the criminal serves his/her time
in prison, then gets released and then kills again. They usually do this for two reasons: committing
crime is all they are accustom to or they never learned their lesson while behind bars. There have
also been times where people have escaped prison and the only way they know they'll get away is
by killing anyone that gets in their way. Majority of the public believes that if the criminal gets out
and kills again, it's the justice systems fault because it's their job to keep us safe.
In the past, the death penalty used to be more aggressive than it is nowadays. On the books there are
four types of death penalty

The world is constantly evolving for the better and the worse, with this being said, not only will
good come out of it but new evils will arise. We can't stop the world from changing, but we can
decide how we handle it. The death penalty should be legalized all around the world. The death
penalty not only diminishes threats to society but it also brings closure to those who are grieving. In
the United States alone, the death penalty is not legal in all 50 states, therefore overrunning the
prisons with unnecessary bodies. Due to this, there has been an overall increase in the gang activity
within state and federal prison. The death penalty shows that violent, brutal, and heinous crimes will
not be tolerated and the offenders will be punished to the highest extent. Execution should be used as
the highest form of punishment by the means of a rightful conviction. National government forcing
the death sentence in all states can possibly be used as a means to persuade criminals not to become
criminals in the first place. In "Does the Death Penalty Deter Crime?," it was stated that "The modern
refereed studies have consistently shown that capital punishment has a strong deterrent effect, with
each execution deterring between 3 and 18 murders." Not only is execution a form of crime
deterrent it also allows justice to be better served. An author once stated that "the most fundamental
principle of justice is that the punishment should fit the crime. When someone plans and brutally

Only God should create and destroy life "Many Christians believe that God commanded "Thou shalt
not kill" (Exodus 21:13), and that this is a clear instruction with no exceptions.
Death penalty is the punishment of a criminal offender ruled by the court. About 13,000 people have
been legally executed in the US (White). Thirty–one states currently have the death penalty. It is
expensive, makes us murderers too and doesn't truly give justice. Even though some religious people
believe there is nothing wrong with the death penalty, death penalty is wrong because the
punishment of life in prison is worse than being on death row and it is expensive to taxpayers.
When it comes to religious people and the death penalty, there are mixed emotions. Some believe it
is nothing wrong with the death penalty. They believe that if someone does anything treasonous
that results in death they should be punished by the death penalty. They think that they should die
for the suffering of someone else. However, others believe that the death penalty is a sin because
killing is a sin. "Thou shall not kill" is one of the Ten Commandments. Jesus once said "he that is
without sin among you, let him cast the first stone at her", this means that everyone sins and no sin
is greater than another sin. So just because someone kills someone do not mean they should be
killed for it, the same way they may have killed someone another person may have lied and lying is
no less than killing. (Does Christianity Support the Death Penalty?)
Sitting in prison will be a better punishment than being killed, they will be suffering and paying for
their crimes. The death penalty does not truly give justice because you are making the victims'
family happy but hurting the criminals' family. Why punish the criminals' family because of the
criminals' crime? What if the criminal has a kid(s)? It is like you are giving one family closure but
making things worse for another. At least if the criminal is in prison they can visit them instead of
watching them get killed. Parents would rather be able to go see their child behind bars rather than
to have to go see their child's' grave. (Messerli)
The death penalty costs taxpayers a lot of money. It costs more to execute

The Cons of the Death Penalty Essay
The Cons of the Death Penalty
"...Over 600 people were falsely convicted and 35 faced death for crimes that they did not
commit..."(Johnson). The death penalty is an ineffective and expensive way of dealing justice to
the American people. It is easier and cheaper to send someone to prison for life than to have them
face the death penalty and be executed. Capital punishment is an unnecessary punishment because
criminals are already managed at prisons.
69
The death penalty can lead to the death of innocent people. For example, "...According to a new
study, serious errors occur in almost 70% of all trials leading to the death penalty..."(Leibman). This
shows that if 100 people were put on death row, 70 would have serious mistakes in their...show more
content...
The lack of proper resources during a trial can make the difference between the innocence and
guilt of a person. The death penalty does not always show the innocence or guilt of a person. It
shows how much he or she is willing to spend to help the trial go his or her way. The death penalty
is an unfair system to those who cannot afford the "evidence" they need to help free them.
224
The death penalty is a corrupt form of legal justice. For example, "...Defendants in about one–third of
the Texas cases were represented at trial by an attorney who had been or later was suspended or
otherwise sanctioned..."(Leibman). This use of fraudulent attorneys in a case can lead to enough
inaccuracies in the evidence to wrongfully execute a person. This action is against the
constitutional right given to us of equal justice for all. In addition, "...One of you two is gonna
hang for this. Since you're the nigger, you're elected..."(Texas Police Officer). A Texas police
officer said this to 2 men, one black and one white that were connected to the murder of a
17–year–old girl. Race plays a big part in the sentence of guilty or innocent. However, supporters of
the death penalty claim "...that it enforces the laws by issuing strict punishment to the
offenders..."(President George Bush). The death

Death Penalty Pros And Cons Research Paper
This paper explores the cons of death penalty in the American society. America's history and
political ethos are all about liberty. The Declaration of Independence declares that life, liberty and
the pursuit of happiness are unalienable rights, however, both life and life and the pursuit of
happiness also depend on liberty as a fundamental bedrock of the country. Ages until the early part of
the twentieth century, was devoted to freeing society from the shackles of death penalty. An agenda
which should be embraced by all the Americans. The United States Constitution constitution strictly
avows respect for life. The restraints place on the government in the Constitution by the Founders are
but a failure. The death penalty uses cruel and unusual

In the world we as people live in violence. Violence has gotten so out of control that it has affected
everyone. The one thing about violence is that it also leads to crimes. And crimes leads to some
people being imprisoned, while others are put on death row. But if crimes are crimes, what
makes them minor or major? Who decides if they are minor or major? Nowadays minor and
major crimes are being pushed together. For example, someone gets shot and the shooter gets 5
years in prison. But if someone is raped it cannot be proven and the victim is left suicidal while the
rapist goes about their day. Both are major crimes but one has a sentence and the other one does
not. With this happening in the world it makes me wonder if we as the people...show more content...
30)." The community as a whole should already have what crime gets the death penalty. If it takes
a lot of money to make sure that this particular crime was committed by the right person then so be
it. It should not matter whether it takes another month or so to be accurate with the crime
committed. Also Robinson adds "Some experts believe deciding to limit the death penalty will no
longer make it a potential deterrent to criminals (Robinson par. 24)." If the death penalty is
restricted then there is no hope of it having an effect on the population a little as time passes.
Robinsons also wrote about how the death penalty should be used:
More discriminate use of the death penalty – reserving its use for only highly aggravated crimes, the
'worst of the worst' – will lessen the risk of flawed convictions and sentences and ensure that those
who really deserve to be on death row will be executed. [There shouldn't be restriction to the death
penalty because] ... the capital punishment system will remain flawed and it is more likely that
less–deserving or innocent prisoners will be convicted and put on death row. (Robinson par. 7)
In life there is always going to be something that is flawed with the death penalty. The reason being
is because of human error. Human error happens a lot and sometimes it

The Death Penalty is also known as Capital Punishment, where an offender is punished for their
crime, done by the state by taking their life. Although many countries have abolished the death
penalty, it still exists in few countries, including the United States. Some oppose the death penalty
believing it to be morally unjust for those who are indeed innocent but are under the death penalty.
Many philosophers believe it is necessary for punishment to deter crime and this punishment is
justice for the victim. Haag was a professor at Fordham University, and supported the death penalty
very strongly. He strongly believed that offenders needed to be punished severely to satisfy
retributive justice. Hugo Adam Bedau was a philosophy professor at Tufts University. Unlike Haag
he opposed the death penalty based on morality issues. He questioned the moral values of death
penalty and believes in the natural right to life .
This essay talks about the conflicting ideas on death penalty by two people, one who opposes the
death penalty and one who supports it The death penalty is a tricky subject, one may feel that in a
certain situation it is right to punish an offender by taking their life but at the same time in a
different situation they might feel that is wrong to take their life and one should give the offender a
chance to realize their mistake and give them a second chance at life rather than taking away their
life.
Philosophers such as Kant and Van Den Haag supported the death

I believe that the death penalty serves justice to people around the United State of America. The
death penalty is a very harsh, and cruel punishment. In some cases though, it is necessary for that
punishment. They have different methods of death penalties in different states. The most common
method is lethal injection. Hearing the word death puts a feeling of fear into the criminal being
sentenced. I believe that makes other people not want to commit crimes as much. The death
penalty is the worst thing you could ever be sentenced. The death penalty is used for a reason. To
serve justice, and to prevent other crimes from taking place. I believe that the death penalty is used
for good reasons. One of those reasons is because it strikes fear into other criminals eyes. When
other criminals are seeing people getting sentenced to death it makes them not want to do the crime
as much. Another reason why is because the family knows justice is getting served when the
criminal is killed. It brings a sense of peace to the loved one's family knowing that the person who
killed their loved one is getting killed. These are the reasons why I agree with the death penalty. I
support this claim with evidence because they have interviewed criminals who have said that the
death penalty scares them. The death penalty was made for justice and to prevent crimes. And it is
working to an extent. The murder rate in the USA has gone down by 2.8 percent in the last 5 years.
Although, the normal

Essay on Death Penalty Pros and Cons
In this time of life, where things have changed to a better world, it still exist massacre, what it's
called death penalty. "United Stated is one of the six nations that commonly continue with this
dramatic scenario" (Human Rights).Debates and political issues have been put into effect to stop
this cruel and inhuman punishment. Since early years people have the belief of killing each other
to solve their problem; what's the idea of slaughter if pain would not be applicable? We should keep
them breathing to make them suffer the same way they cause the suffer ness of us or other people.
Its hard to see one of your family members get killed by one of this people, the first thing we want
is to see them get killed, but if you stop and...show more content...
People are not against the death penalty, they want to see people get killed for their mistakes;
(APW wrote: DP another way) "I am wondering if any of you who can support the death penalty,
would be willing to push the buttons, or inject the poison to commit murder? They are murderers,
and rapists and the like, so they kill. We are Children of God; we haven't the right to kill another
soul. That is in the hands of God alone. We have the responsibility to keep these people away from
others, and rehabilitate, if possible. That is all. Would any of you push that button?" It's hard to see
us pass the law of murder, why should we make the same mistake they did.
Many rapes, violations or other situation have been done by people that don't care of life of other
or their life, do you think if putting him into the death penalty he would care, it's only a quick pain,
they would not care if getting killed. Their many ways to solve this problem for example:
rehabilitation or solitary confinement, if you think about it this is worse than death. Death is quick;
solitary is for 1–80 years or more, with this as well, no contact with the outside. It's like a living
death in a world of pain and suffer ness, it would make them consider it twice before doing
something bad, just to think a life with nobody to talk, it would make them realize in what situation
they got into, it would set a good example to all the criminals. Violence

After viewing the National Geographic documentary titled "Death Row Texas", I found myself
grieving the loss of my father. Preceding my father's death, he was an employee of the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) working as a Correctional Officer at the Texas State
Penitentiary at Huntsville, known as the "Walls Unit". Over the years, some of the stories that my
father shared with me regarding TDCJ unfair system has me struggling with this question,
particularly since TDCJ designed the system to oppress people of color through the act of mass
incarceration, life in prison, and the death sentence according to a news article published by the New
Yorker titled, "The Caging of America". In the United States of America, White Americans have been
murdering innocent African–Americans for centuries without punishments for their crimes, and yet
today this behavior continues throughout our criminal justice system. According to the Texas
Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, Texas alone has accounted for more than 30% of the
executions in the United States, and over the past five years, people of color make up 80% of the
death sentences in Texas with more than 60% of the death sentences imposed on
African–Americans. In response to the question whether Willie Earl Pondexter Jr., Johnny Ray
Johnson and David Martinez deserve the death penalty, I am still undecided on my position due to
my uncertainty regarding the usefulness in imposing the death sentence. Furthermore,

Most people in the United States believe we should have the death penalty. They believe that the
death penalty keeps people from committing crimes. Most of these people today think that people
will get scared of being executed by gas or needle and that they won't commit real bad crimes. A
lot of other people believe that it is just plain wrong to kill someone and no one should be killed
for any reason even murder and rape and so they are against the death penalty. I will talk to you
about these problems with the death penalty in my paper. Everyone should ask themselves what
they believe. Do you believe that by killing people using the death it will save lives. The death
penalty is called capital punishment. You get sentenced with...show more content...
Even if you don't believe in the death penalty, the United States does have it. There are many
reasons people have for being against it. The American Civil Liberties Union is a organization
that fights against the death penalty. They don't believe that the death penalty should be used at
all. They have been trying for years and years to get rid of the death penalty. Some of the things
the ACLU does is they will be the attorney for some people if they are sentenced with the death
penalty. They go around the country and the world trying to end the death penalty everywhere.I
remember all the news stories about people being put in the prison for the wrong reason so that is
some of the reasons people don't like it.
Summary
Everyone has to decide for themselves if they believe in the death penalty or not. You can't just
use one person's opinon. You have to look at it for yourself and decide what you believe. Death
penalty is not the right way to do things all the time because it can be not fair and people may do
some bad things but that doesn't mean they have to die for the things they have done and I think a
lot of people should agree with me. Since the bible times people have been killed for doing many
different things. There are many states that still use the death penalty or capital punishment and
there are many states who don't. Texas is a state that is very hard on criminals. The killed more
people with the death penalty than

The Government used to have a death penalty where you would have to sit in a chair that shocks
you all the way to your death. When time has come passed the electric chair was eliminated and
now their using the lethal injection where you are poisoned and killed instantly. Out of
everybody on the death row 42% are Black, 43% are Whites, 13% are Hispanic, and 2% are other
races. In the US there was 3,035 people on death row last October. 150 death row inmates were
released due to their innocence being found. In Cali people who killed whites where 3 times more
likely to get the death row then those who killed blacks.In a proposal I read that the government was
thinking about blind folding and shooting inmates on death row because of technical...show more
content...
The US remains the same company as Iran china and Iraq as the users of capital punishment. I don't
think anyone's job description should be killing another person that bleeds the same blood as you.
Death penalty is lethal raffle. Out of 15000 to homicides every year in US, only about 120 people
are punished with death. That's less than 1% of the people in jail for murder. There has to be a
better punishment that can take place for the inmate's family than just putting an inmate to rest.
The families of the murder victims go through trauma and the loss of a loved on. No one should
have the power to take someone from their family especially forever. But execution doesn't help
the people redeem are end the pain that you all have caused. The longed process regarding to
executions extends the wait that the family waits to hear the bed news. The Families of the
murder victim would be better if the money being used now for the expensive process of execution
were provided with counseling and assistant. Murder cases cost 1.5 million are more. Paying for
prosecution and defense makes the state and counties pay $9 million a year. The death penalty
brings civilians lives to a

Cons Of Death Penalty Essay

Recommandé

Recommandé

Contenu connexe

Plus de Custom Paper Writing Service

Plus de Custom Paper Writing Service (20)

Dernier

Dernier (20)

Cons Of Death Penalty Essay