Roe V Wade Essay

Roe V. Wade Essay
Many states had conflicting criminal laws due to the debate on whether life begins at conception or
at some other point in utero. These debates were based on religious belief systems, state laws, and
common law practices. There was no definitive line to be drawn upon when the fetus should be
considered a person with rights. Then, in 1973, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in the
decision Roe v. Wadethat abortions in all states were generally legal and allowed pregnant mothers
to receive abortions. The legal reasoning that the Supreme Court utilized in their decision in Roe v.
Wade was the right to privacy, which began with Griswold v. Connecticut. This was the first time
that the Supreme Court recognized an individual right to...show more content...
Wade, the legal reasoning of right to privacy was further reviewed and solidified. The method used
in this form of legal reasoning was "reasoning from precedent", as it follows from the standard of
the right to privacy set in Griswold. In the case, the Texas statute in question made it a crime to
obtain an abortion unless the purpose was to save the life of the mother. A single, unmarried woman
Norma McCorvey wished to terminate her pregnancy under with a licensed physician under safe,
clinical conditions and was unable to get a "legal" abortion in Texas because her life did not appear
to be threatened by the pregnancy and she could not afford to travel to another jurisdiction in order
to secure a legal abortion under safe conditions (410 U.S. 113, 1973). She filed suit under the alias of
Jane Roe that the Texas laws were unconstitutionally vague and that they abridged her right of
personal privacy, protected by the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments. On the
merits, the District Court held that the "fundamental right of single women and married persons to
choose whether to have children is protected by the Ninth Amendment" and that the Texas criminal
abortion statutes were void on their face because they were both unconstitutionally vague and
constituted an overbroad infringement of the plaintiffs' Ninth Amendment rights (314 F. Supp 1217,
1970)." Under Roe, is also its federal companion Doe v. Bolton. In the case, married couple (the
Doe's)
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Abortion: Roe v. Wade Essay
ABORTION
Abortion has always been an extremely controversial issue. There are, and will probably always
be many different views concerning the ethical acceptability as well as the social policy aspects
of abortion. In fact, before the decision made in the famous court case of Roe v. Wade, abortion
was morally wrong and was constituted as a crime that could lead to a prison sentence of up to five
years. In Roe v. Wade, many unsettled questions were avowed and discussed.
Is the Texas law banning abortion unconstitutional? This is just one of the many issues proposed
throughout the case. According to Supreme Court Justice Harry A. Blackmun–no, it is not. The
decision was made that there is a right to abortion and women...show more content...
According to Justice Blackmun, the decision to terminate a pregnancy is accounted for in the
woman's right to privacy. However, he also contends that the state has a right to protect potential life,
and this interest becomes compelling at the point of viability.
Until a pregnant single woman, by the fictional name of Jane Roe, challenged the Texas criminal
abortion law, the decision whether or not to terminate the pregnancy was left entirely up to the State.
Justice Blackmun, along with six other justices, argued that the decision to abort should be available
to the woman–but only up to a certain point during the pregnancy. In order to decide when the
decision should fall from the woman's hands to the States, the court resolved to divide the pregnancy
into three trimesters. During the first trimester, the State is not liable to regulate. The decision to
abort is therefore left to the woman and her physician. This is so because until the end of the first
trimester, morality in abortions is less than in normal childbirth. For the subsequent trimester, the
State may only regulate the abortion procedure and where the procedure is administered. Once into
the third trimester, the State can deny the right to abort entirely, but only if the health or life of the
mother is implicated. These trimesters allow the state at liberty to place multiplying restrictions on
abortion as the gestation lengthens.
In conclusion, the Roe v. Wade case did more than solely

Roe vs Wade
In 1973, the Supreme Court made a decision in one of the most controversial cases in history, the
case of Roe v. Wade (410 U.S. 113 (1973)), in which abortion was legalized and state anti
–abortion
statues were struck down for being unconstitutional. This essay will provide a brief history and
analysis of the issues of this case for both the woman's rights and the states interest in the matter.
Also, this essay will address the basis for the court ruling in Roe's favor and the effects this decision
has had on subsequent cases involving a woman's right to choose abortion in the United States. The
court's decision created legal precedent for several subsequent abortion restriction cases and has led
to the development of legislation to protect women's health rights. Although the Supreme Court's
decision in Roe v. Wadewas a historic victory for women's rights, it is still an extremely
controversial subject today and continues to be challenged by various groups.
Roe v. Wade Case Law Analysis
Before 1973, abortion access was determined by state legislature for each individual state with no
consistency across the United States. Some states allowed abortions but most state statues heavily
restricted or completely banned abortion. The restricted states would generally only allow abortion
in the event of rape, incest, fetal anomalies, or the woman's life is at risk. The state of Texas
enforced a state statute that made it illegal for an abortion to be performed unless the woman's

The Abortion Case Roe vs Wade Essay
The Abortion Case: Roe vs. Wade Abstract Roe vs. Wade is one of the most controversial cases
in U.S. history. The historic decision made by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973 legalized abortion
on a federal level. Now more than thirty years later people all over the country are trying to
overturn the decision as well as striving to keep it intact. The Abortion Case: Roe vs. Wade A
Texas law that made abortion a crime except when in the case of saving the mothers life was
overruled by the United States Supreme Court on January 22, 1973 . In 1970, abortion was
illegal for women who live in many of the states of the U.S. until a woman by the name of Norma
McCorvey also known as Jane Roe decided it was time to make a change. McCorvey...show more
content...
Since the Texas abortion laws were so unclear many doctors and hospitals turned away most
abortion cases to avoid significant penalties such as, a felony sanction of up to five years in jail and
/or revocation of their medical license. The Original Case– May 23, 1970 Norma McCorvey who
was the plaintiff took on "Jane Roe" as her alias to protect her real identity. The case was
originally filed on Roe's behalf but it was transformed into a class action suit so that McCorvey
could represent all pregnant women. The defendant was Henry B. Wade, the district attorney of
Dallas County, Texas. Roe had two major hurdles to get over: 1. A pregnant woman lacked
standing to sue over a law's potential unconstitutionally since the law applied to medical practice
(and not patients) (Dawn Stacey M.Ed, n.d.) 2. Given the lengthiness of court proceedings, the
case may be declared no longer applicable and thrown out of court once McCorvey gave birth ( or
at least passed the point where an abortion could be safely performed) (Dawn Stacey M.Ed, n.d.)
The case was filed anyway with the agreement that the 1859 Texas abortion law violated a women's
constitutional right to have an abortion. The attorneys in the case were Sarah Weddington and Linda
Coffee who represented the plaintiff and John Tolle and Jay Floyd were chosen to represent the
defendant; Tolle was selected to defend the enforcement of the Texas abortion law and

Roe Vs Wade Essay
In the court case Roe v. Wade, Jane Roe (false name to protect her real identity) wanted an
abortion. However, in some states like in Texas (where this all took places) abortion was illegal
unless it was to save the woman's life. In 1970, Roe and her team of lawyers were fighting to
protect her and all of the women in the world to have a say in what's right and wrong if them. Roe's
team of lawyers were suing Henry Wade, the district attorney of dallas county, Texas. Her team of
lawyers and er wanted to obtain an injunction, which would stop Wade from enforcing the law
against abortion. The Federal court ruled in favor of Roe, stating that the Texas law against abortion
was unconstitutional. Wade appealed the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court ruled
in favor of Roe 7–2. They stated that "with Roe's assertion that woman had the absolute right to end
pregnancy in anyway and at any time...woman's right to privacy had to be balanced with a state's
interest in regulating abortion"(Encyclopaedia Britannica). This statement means that it the choice
of whether to have an abortion or not is up to the woman, but the state has a right to protect the fetus.
This court case has a lot to do with the 14th amendment. The 14th amendment is all citizens of the
United States nor shall any state deprive any person...show more content...
This group was founded in 1969, so it was around when Roe v. Wadewas going on. They supported
Roe and her team. In 1973, after Roe v. Wade just ended the group renamed themselves "National
Abortion Rights Action League". In the article after the court case the group now thought
"concentrated on identifying allies in the federal government". This meant that they now believe that
the government understood where they were coming from and saw their point of view. The main
goal of this group was to protect the choices of women such as: abortion, rights, voting, and equal
pay and

Roe Vs Wade Essay
Roe v. Wade was a decision made by United States Supreme Court regarding abortion in 1973. It
was, and still is, one of the most controversial decisions the Supreme Court has ever made. Abortion
is defined "the ending of pregnancy by removing a fetus or embryo before it can survive outside the
uterus". The appellant was a single, pregnant woman from Texas who wished to get an abortion.
Prior to the court's decision, abortion was illegal under Texas state law except in cases where the
abortion would save the pregnant woman's life. The appellee was Henry Wade, a lawyer defending
the Texas state law. The court ruled on the side of Roe, with a 7–2 decision. The Supreme Court
"ruled that the Texas statute violated Jane Roe's constitutional right to privacy", and argued that the
"Constitution's First, Fourth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments protect an...show more content...
It was argued that anti–abortion laws were "the product of a Victorian social concern to discourage
illicit sexual conduct" (543). Another reason abortion was previously prohibited was because "the
procedure was a hazardous one for the woman" (544). The court pointed out that this was no longer
valid or relevant in this day of age. They explained that abortion was now "relatively safe", and that
"mortality rates for women undergoing early abortions, where the procedure is legal, appear to be as
low as or lower than the rates of normal childbirth" (544). When abortion is prohibited, women
seeking abortions sometimes tend to undergo illegal abortions, which are extremely unsafe.
Therefore, the court said, "the state has a legitimate interest in seeing that abortion, like any other
medical procedure, is performed under circumstances that insure maximum safety for the patient"
(544). When abortion was illegal, the mortality rate for women having abortions was significantly
higher than when it was made

Essay on Roe v. Wade 1973
Even to this day, women have not reached maximum equality, but the landmark Supreme Court case
Roe v. Wade has helped the women's equality movement drastically take a step in the right direction.
Prior to the case, women had their rights very limited and restricted. Everyone was and still is
entitled to their basic rights, however pregnant women were not. Their first, fourth, fifth, ninth, and
fourteenth amendment rights were violated and were not addressed until Jane Roe testified in court.
The decision made by the court still has a lasting impact even to this day. The landmark Supreme
Court case Roe v. Wadewas not just a win for Jane Roe, but a win for all women as it helped break
the barrier that surrounded women's equality. The...show more content...
Henry Wade represented the Texas state law to prohibit abortion. Eventually, the case came to a
close and was decided on January 22, 1973. Ever since the case of Roe v. Wade, there have been
approximately 1.5 million legal abortions each year (Edwards III, Wattenberg, and Lineberry 131).
During the years leading up to and after 1973, there were numerous events and situations that
occurred. Before 1965, the idea of right to privacy was barely used, but Griswold v. Connecticut
(1965) changed that. "The case involved a Connecticut law forbidding the use of contraceptives"
(Edwards III, Wattenberg, and Lineberry 131). A doctor and a family
–planner were arrested for
distributing the use of contraceptives for couples in need. They were eventually brought to court by
the state and were convicted. The case was taken to the Supreme Court and was later decided that
everyone is entitled to their "right to privacy." This set the precedent for Roe v. Wade because
without Griswold v. Connecticut, the decision might be completely different than what it is now. A
court case called Rust v. Sullivan was related to abortion. It specified that "family planning services
receiving federal funds could not provide women any counseling regard abortion" (Edwards III,
Wattenberg, and Lineberry 131). This decision created public scrutiny as the decision would violate
the First Amendment. President Clinton eventually lifted the ban on abortion counseling as it

Roe Vs. Wade
The two–minute wait is over. Beth looks down, there it is on the Stick, PREGNANT. Her life has
automatically changed. No more hopes of finishing college, of finding her dream ob. Poof! All
of a sudden everything was gone, just because of a stupid mistake at that dumb party! She knows
the fetus in her body has no heartbeat and two simple pills can make this nightmare go away. Too
bad, Beth lives in a small town of Louisiana, where abortion is a synonym for the devil. The Roe
vs Wade case where the Supreme Court ruled that it is a woman's decision to have an abortion is
overlooked to the point of being considered illegal. They argue that Roe vs. Wade must be
overturned. They say Abortion is unconstitutional and is encouraging murder; Re evaluation...show
more content...
The matter of Abortion has many precedent cases before it, that secure the right to an abortion
(Doug Linder)
1. the power of judicial review (Marbury v. Madison, 1803).
2. the doctrine of exceptionless rights (13th, 14th & 15th Amendments).
3. substantive due process (the 14th Amendment and related cases).
4. the mutuality of rights and duties (overturning of Plessy v. Ferguson).
5. the rights of workers (overturning of Lochner v. New York).
6. the rights of women (the 19th Amendment).
7. the rights of children (overturning of Hammer v. Dagenhart).
8. the doctrine of unenumerated rights (Roe v. Wade).
9. the right of personal autonomy (overturning of Plessy v. Ferguson).
10. equality under the law (Brown v. Board of

The Supreme Court Case of Roe vs. Wade Essay
The Supreme Court Case of Roe vs. Wade In 1973 the United States Supreme Court decided the
case of Roe V. Wade. Jane Roe was a single mother trying to raise one child on a limited income.
She was living in Dallas Texas when she became pregnant with another child. There were no
medical issues that would have prevented her from carrying this child to full term. The lack of
income and already having a child was her deciding factor. In March of 1970 Jane Roe filed suit
against the state of Texas. She declared that the Texas Criminal Abortion Statues were
unconstitutional. Jane Roe claimed that the Texas statue was vague and took away her right of
personal privacy. These rights were protected by the first, fourth, fifth, ninth and...show more
content...
The decision whether or not abortion was legal was left up to individual states. The statues that
made abortion a crime in Texas are articles 1191–1194 and 1196 of Texas's penal code. Under these
codes the only way a woman can have an abortion is if her life is in danger and she will die if one
is not performed. Texas has had anti abortion laws since 1854. The first ever written abortion
statue was in England in 1803 it made abortion of a 'quick fetus' a capital crime punishable by
death. Lesser punishments for an abortion done before quickening were enacted. 'Quickening' is
defined as the fetus's first sign of movement in the womb. This act by Lord Ellenborough was the
bases for abortion laws in the United States. Connecticut was the first state to pass abortion
legislation. Although women would not receive the death penalty it would be illegal and not
without consequences to terminate a pregnancy for a women 'quick with child'. New York
followed Connecticut's lead and also enacted anti abortion laws in 1828. New York made all
abortions illegal no matter what part of pregnancy the women were in. New York made it a
misdemeanor to terminate a pregnancy in the first stages; in the latter stages it would be considered
manslaughter. Most States adopted this way of dealing with abortion statues. A committee on
criminal abortions was put in place in May of 1857. This committee would watch over the large

Roe V Wade Essay
In 1973, the Supreme Court legalized abortion in the Roe v. Wade case. The law of abortion is
important because it has to do with the decision of choosing to end the life of an unborn child. It
allows women to decide whether or not they are prepared to carry a child inside of them over the
course of nine months. Over time there has been a lot of debate on whether or not a woman should
be allowed to make this decision, and on certain restrictions that should be applied to these cases. In
the past decades there have been many court cases and laws that have either supported pro–life
groups or challenged them. Roe v. Waderemains one of the most prominent cases regarding
abortion in the U.S due to the fact it was so controversial and impacted the lives of many
american woman. The case transpired in Texas, a state which outlawed any form of abortion
unless a mother's health became endangered. Norma McCorvey, famously known as Jane Roe,
became pregnant for a second time with a child she was unable to care for, she seeked a form of
legal abortion in Texas with no luck which lead her to two lawyers who could help bring a lawsuit
to assist women in obtaining a legal means for abortion. In the case they used the name Jane Roe to
protect her identity and were challenging an attorney from Dallas County Texas, Henry Wade. The
case came before the supreme court in 1973, in which the court decision ruled 7 to 2 for abortion to
be legal due to the 14th amendment as well as the right to

Roe v. Wade research paper
In the controversial case, Roe v. Wade, a pregnant woman who was given the name Jane Roe to
hide her identity attempted to get an abortion but they were illegal in Texas so she sued the state
for invasion of privacy. Roe's real name is Norma McCorvey; she was an ex–carnival worker who
was raped and became pregnant. In 1969, when she moved back to her home state, she was denied
and abortion on grounds that her health was not threatened. She started to look for other options,
such as an abortion clinic out of the country, but those were too risky. She had given up searching
for a safe, clinical abortion when two lawyers contacted her about her story. These lawyers were
Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington. Weddington had herself been through
...show more content...
Tolle's last goal was to learn Jane Roe's real identity because he felt that if it were publicized, that
information would win the case for him. With both of the arguments stated and the representatives in
place, the initial trial began. There were several appearances in court for this case, which resulted in
three rulings, the last one being in the Supreme Court. The Dallas Texas court threw out the case on
the conclusion that the plaintiffs had no right to sue. Then Roe's lawyers went to their first appeals
court, which ruled on June 17, 1970 that the Does had no right to sue but Jane Roe and Dr. Hallford
had a reasonable case with the right to sue. The appellant's and appellee's had specific arguments
when the second appeal came around. The appellant's argued that the ninth and fourteenth
amendments strongly support the right to abortion. The defense questioned Dr. Hallford's role in the
case but the prosecution came back with the comment that he was not an original filer of the suit so
if he is inappropriate, it should not affect the case. Their third argument stated, "the state could not
actually tell when the moment of death actually occurred – during an abortion or beforehand. She
(Weddington) concluded that, just as there could be no presumption of life without proof, neither
could there be a presumption of death without proof." (Herda, 65) The appellee's argument was not
as straight foreword. They argued that

Roe Vs Wade Case Study
ROE v. WADE
Supreme Court of the United States,
5th Circuit, 1983.
410 U.S. 113.
FACTS The prosecution, Jane Roe, a pregnant single women brought a class action lawsuit in an
effort to challenge the laws in Texas surrounding abortion and their constitutionality. Texas laws
made it illegal to have an abortion without the medical direction of a medical professional, in which
case it would be for the health and well–being of the pregnant mother. The respondents made up of
Dr. Hallford who was criminally charged with for violating Texas abortion laws; and a married
couple with no children, the Does, who sought to fight the enforcement of Texas abortion laws by
the government for being unconstitutional. The defendant was Henry Wade, the county District
...show more content...
REASON The court held that it is the primary responsibility of the pregnant women's physician to
determine the termination of pregnancy during the first trimester. During the second trimester, the
State is allowed to intervene in the termination of an unborn fetus with legitimate interest in the
pregnant women's health. The State would intervene by regulating the procedures surrounding the
women's health. In the third trimester, the State may regulate the procedures surrounding the
women's health and even prohibiting the abortion altogether, keeping the pregnant women's health a
top priority. TheSupreme Court of the United States held that the lawsuit regarding pregnancy, is an
exception to the general rule that a difference must occur during each stage of the judicial review,
and not only when the action is proposed. The Does complaint searching for injunctive relief was
solely based on the contingencies which might or might not have occurred. It was irrelevant for the
Court to decide Dr. Hallford's case for injunctive relief, because once the Supreme Court found the
laws unconstitutional, the Texas Government were not allowed to enforce them. The dissenting
opinion of Justice Rehnquist was that the right to an abortion is not widely accepted by everyone,
and that the right to privacy on the matter of abortion is not constitutionally involved in this case. In
addition, Justice White made his dissenting opinion based on the constitutional foundations
surrounding Jane Roe and the Does, stating: "In every other case, there was something in the
Constitution you could point to for support. There, nothing." Justice White would later conclude that
he would return the issue back

Roe Vs Wade Research Paper Outline
The Roe v. Wade law disallowed abortion by fabricated means aside from when the mother's life
was in jeopardy. The act was translated as a "nearly complete ban on abortion." (Hoffer, Peter. Roe
v. Wade: The Abortion Rights Controversy in American History, 2nd Edition (Landmark Law Cases
and American Society. Kansas: University Press of Kansas. 2010. Print.) Roe believed that a woman
had the right to end her pregnancy, while wade believed that our State had a responsibility to defend
that unborn child . Disputed from the point it was discharged, Roe v. Wadepolitically separated the
country tremendously, and keeps on to inspire intense discussions, legislative issues, and even
brutality today. Since the Supreme Court's settlement in Roe v. Wade, differences surrounding the
issue has effected the...show more content...
(Antevil, Jeffrey. Supreme Court rules on Roe vs. Wade in 1973. New York Daily News. print.) So
the court analyzed abortion laws and its history from then till now, and with that they found 3
justifications for outlawing abortions: "a Victorian social concern to discourage illicit sexual
conduct"; protecting the health of women; and protecting prenatal life." (McBride, Alex. Roe v.
Wade (1973). The Supreme Court. December 2006. Print.) The Court denied the first two as they
were pointless but as for the third, the Court disputed that fetal life wasn't necessarily a "person" as
said and guarded in the U.S. Constitution. Culturally, although a few associations view fetuses as
human beings that justify full rights, no general agreement exists. The Court than stated that Texas
was thus capturing that only one "view" of many individuals. Securing all fetuses beneath this
outlook of prenatal life wasn't amply valuable to explain the state's prevention of roughly all

Roe V Wade Thesis Statement
Roe v. Wade is one of the most talked about Supreme Court cases in history. This paper is going to
give a brief overview of this monumental case, how the case affected America, how America would
be different if this ruling of this case would have been different, and my personal opinion and
reaction to Roe v. Wade.
In 1973, Norma McCovery who is also known as Jane Roe brought a case to the Supreme Court.
She and her defense team claimed that the 1859 Texasabortion law violated women's constitutional
right to have an abortion. Before reaching the Supreme Court, this case, which was a class–action
suit, was argued in a Dallas Fifth Circuit Court on May 23, 1970. The judges in Dallas ruled that the
Texas law violated Roe's right to privacy which is found in both the Ninth and Fourteenth
Amendment, so this case was then sent to the U.S. Supreme Court (Brannen and Hanes, 2001).
When Roe v. Wade reached the Supreme Court, it received great interest from all over the
country. On December 13, 1971 the case was first argued in front of the judges, but on this day
only seven judges were present. The seven judges present decided that this case was so important
that the case needed to be reargued when the two new judges were present in the Court. On October
10, 1972 the lawyers repeated their arguments to all 9 of the Supreme Court judges and on January
22, 1973 the decision was made (Brannen and Hanes, 2001).
The ruling of Roe v. Wade included three key ideas. The first key idea was that women had the
right to choose to have an abortion during the stage of pregnancy when the fetus had little chance of
survival outside the womb and that women were able to obtain an abortion within unreasonable
interferences from the state. The second idea confirmed a state's power to restrict abortions when a
fetus could live outside the womb, except in the case when the mother's life was at risk. The final
key idea that was decided in the ruling was that the state has interests in both the health of the
women and the life of the fetus (Brannen and Hanes, 2001).
This controversial case ruled that a woman's ability to be able to chose to get an abortion is
considered a protected liberty. It also concluded that this

Roe Vs Wade Thesis Statement
Roe v. Wade
Laurie Vasquez
Northern Virginia Community College
Roe v. Wade
Have you ever wondered what caused women to fight for equality? Roe v. Wade is one of the most
popular and well–known cases due to the fact that it legalized abortions in the US. Abortion was a
topic that was overlooked so women never got the support and attention that was needed, that was
until Sarah Weddington and Norma McCorvey decided to take a legal stand on it. This case gave
abortions a different point of view as well as helped spread awareness on the problem. The US
Supreme Court case, Roe vs. Wade, made people realize the problems women were facing, their
constitutional rights were being violated.
The case began in 1970, when Norma McCorvey, also known as Jane Roe, began seeking a legal
abortion. Jane Roes attorney, Sarah Weddington, understood her position because she became
pregnant when she was attending law school. Weddington was also working three jobs but could
barely afford the procedure (Gold & Donovan, 2017, pp. 58–59). Women were afraid to have
abortions due to the risks they would have to take like crossing the Mexico–United States border or
other health related risks. Countless abortions either resulted in death or painful infections that
would lead to more problems. In fact, untrained doctors would attempt to perform these procedures
with no anesthetics and unfit equipment. "As late as 1965, illegal abortion accounted for an
estimated 17 percent of all officially

Roe V. Wade Essay
Roe v. Wade Essay "The Court today is correct in holding that the right asserted by Jane Roe is
embraced within the personal liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment. It is evident that the Texas abortion statute infringes that right directly. Indeed, it is
difficult to imagine a more complete abridgment of a constitutional freedom than that worked by the
inflexible criminal statute now in force in Texas. The question then becomes whether the state
interests advanced to justify this abridgment can survive the 'particularly careful scrutiny' that the
Fourteenth Amendment here requires. The asserted state interests are protection of the health and
safety of the pregnant woman, and protection of the potential...show more content...
At the time, the women's movement was only just getting started, and the wide majority of
American males viewed and treated women as less than equals, both socially and economically.
Undeterred, Weddington and Coffee appealed the decision and took it to the highest of legal levels;
the Supreme Court. The Roe vs. Wade decision was first argued in December 1971, and had been
before the Supreme Court for over a year. Although this decision would later be intensely analyzed
and debated, little attention was brought upon the case at the time. Chief Justice Burger opened the
Court's oral arguments, and each side had only thirty minutes to present their case and answer
questions. Sarah Weddington argued that abortion needed to be legalized beyond in the case where a
woman's life is threatened; the physiological and psychological harms to the mother also warranted
an abortion, if she chose. However, since the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over public policy,
Weddington argued that current abortion laws violated the fourteenth amendment. The fourteenth
amendment guarantees the right to liberty without due process of law, and the decision contended
that this right was extended to a woman's right to choose to be pregnant. In her closing argument,
Weddington stated that "if liberty was meaningful... that liberty to these women would mean liberty
from being forced to continue an unwanted pregnancy". Jay Floyd, the assistant attorney general of
Texas, next

Essay Roe v Wade
Roe v. Wade
Have you ever wondered how abortion came to be legal? It was decided in the Supreme Court case
of Roe v. Wade. The 1973 Roe v. Wade decision was a major landmark in not only the abortion issue,
but also in American government.
In 1970, Norma McCorvey, a single and pregnant woman in Texas wanted to get an abortion. The
state laws of Texas at that time stated that it was illegal to have an abortion in Texas. Even though
the state told her that she could go to one of the four states in which abortion was legal to have the
procedure done, she decided that she could not afford to travel to another state to receive the
procedure. Norma McCorvey decided that she would sue the state of Texas, claiming that her...show
more content...
The ninth amendment states that, "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not
be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people" (http://www.house.gov/Constitution
/Amend.html).The fourteenth and the most important in this case states in Section 1 that, All
persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of
the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which
shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive
any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws (http://www.house.gov/Constitution/Amend.html ).
It states in the decision of Roe v. Wade that, "The constitution does not define "person" in so many
words" (http://www.tourolaw.edu/patch/Roe/ 18). The amendment discusses "person" 3 times in it,
but it does not indicate that it has any possible pre–natal relevance; this is what made the abortion
issue so hard. The state court ruled in favor of Roe, but the verdict was not strong enough to change
the arrest of abortion doctors in Texas because the exact part that dealt with the right to privacy
could not be decided

Roe V. Wade Essay
January 23, 2000 marked the twenty–seventh anniversary of the Roe v. Wade case. It all started out
in a small town in Texas where a woman under the alias Jane Roe filed a case in district court for a
woman's right to choose abortion. At this time law in Texas prohibited abortion. Eventually the case
moved to Supreme Court.
The attorneys for Roe argued that the law was unfair and unjust. They said that the unborn fetus id
not a real person. They pointed out that a women should have the right to control their own life
and body. They said it was a right of privacy and if women fell that it's the right choice to abort a
baby they should be allowed to make it. They also said that women should be able to abort a baby if
the birth of the baby...show more content...
They also stated that the fetus wasn't a life until the first trimester of pregnancy. Due to this case and
the ruling of it all states have legalized abortion.
This case has greatly influenced the world today. The changed of the world due to this case are
numerous. You here the mention of abortion daily whether it's in daily conversation, political races,
the Catholic Church and many other places. This topic is very much argued. Some people take the
side of Jane roe and yet other believed in the side of Wade.
This topic is also argued in different religions. The Catholic Church believes that abortion is murder
and no person born or unborn should be unwillingly killed. Murder is against the Ten
Commandments and a serious crime. They believe that abortion is wrong and just as bad as murder.
Many Catholic protest abortion by holding protests outside of abortion clinics.
Many events in world history are related to this case such as abortion clinic bombings. People
believed that abortion was so wrong that they decided to bomb the clinic which they were
preformed at which I believe is a bad judgement. Even though that abortion is wrong and it is
unrightfully killing unborn babies. Bombing these clinic are also unrightfully taking away lives
from people.
There are many ways to show your belief in Pro–life. You can join profile groups, send out
awareness flier to people, and hold protests and sit–ins at abortion clinics.

Essay On Roe Vs Wade
Roe v. Wade Roe v. Wade was a Supreme Court ruling made in 1973 about the legality of abortion.
The essential ruling in the case was the women could legally have an abortion through the first
trimester of their pregnancy and that, after that, abortions could be regulated by the state. The case
was fought by Roe, an unmarried, pregnant women who argued that the ban on abortion went against
her rights and privacy This decision was a landmark one in the Supreme Court due because it ruled
abortion as legal, which had never been done before. The Fourteenth Amendment, specifically the
due process clause, was the piece of legislation cited in the ruling of this case. This decision is also
important because it is still referenced nowadays.
Bakke v. Regents of CA The case of Bakke v. Regents of California was one in which Bakke, a
white applicant to the University, was denied acceptance even though people of minority...show more
content...
It is also important because of the limitations that it placed on the Affirmative Action program and
the fact that the court was divided on this ruling.
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services Webster v. Reproductive Health Services was a 1989
decision in which the Supreme Court upheld legislation from Missouri that prevented an publically
funded establishments for abortion, even if none of the funds used for the abortions were public, and
prevented public from performing abortions on women whose lives weren't in danger among other
things. This decision was important because, although it did not completely overturn the Roe v. Wade
decision of several years back, it did severely limits the protections on abortion that had been put in
place by Roe v. Wade. It is also important because this decision caused several other states to pass
similar legislation.
Planned Parenthood v.

The Impact of Roe V. Wade
The Impact of Roe v. Wade Among the many landmark cases of the United States Supreme Court,
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), still is one of the most controversial and politically significant
cases in U.S. Supreme Court history, greatly affecting political elections and decisions concerning
women's rights ever since. In 1970, a woman named Norma McCorvey, who had been fired from
her for being pregnant; wished to terminate the pregnancy. But in the state of Texas abortions were
illegal expect in cases were the health and/or safety of the mother were at risk. Two woman lawyers;
Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington, who at the time were looking to overturn the restrictions on
abortion laws in Texas recruited Ms. McCorvey, and filed suit...show more content...
Ironically, one result of these restrictions has been to increase the percentage of second trimester
abortions, which are less safe and more morally problematic to many, according to Hontz article.
Many see the days of pre Roe coming back; illegal abortions preformed by so called doctors, young
woman afraid to talk to their parents trying the old self–remedies , and unwanted babies being
thrown away like common trash. But anti–abortion activists have also scored big when it comes to
blocking new medical research that may lead to better contraceptives and earlier medical
abortions; like RU 486, as well stem cell research for the treatments for numerous diseases. "Fetal
tissue research, for instance, has led to advances in the treatment of Parkinson's disease, spinal
cord injuries, diabetes and leukemia. Despite the fact that organs from the corpses of murder
victims can be donated, antiabortion activists believe tissue donation from aborted fetuses
encourages abortion and should therefore be prohibited," (Hontz,1998) . As for Norma McCovrey
and Sarah Weddington, 30 years later they are not on the same side fighting for the rights of
women everywhere to have control over the right to have an abortion. Norma McCovery, 22 at the
time of Courts decision, is now ashamed of what she had done, those she does admit she "wanted a
legal choice" that she "did not want to have an illegal abortion," (Morales, 2003). She

Roe V Wade Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Custom Paper Writing Service

More from Custom Paper Writing Service (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Roe V Wade Essay