SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  17
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Marriage:
  South Carolina’s No. 1
    Weapon Against
   Childhood Poverty
How the Collapse of Marriage Hurts Children
  and Three Steps to Reverse the Damage
        A Heritage Foundation Book of Charts • January 2012

    Richard and Helen DeVos Center for Religion and Civil Society
Growth of Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing in South Carolina, 1929–2010
   Throughout most of South                PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK
Carolina’s history, out-of-wedlock
childbearing was rare.                     50%
                                                                                                           47.5%
  When the federal government’s
War on Poverty began in 1964,
only 12.8 percent of children in           40%
South Carolina were born out of
wedlock. However, over the next
four decades, the number rose
rapidly. By 2010, 47.5 percent of          30%
births in South Carolina occurred
outside of marriage.

                                           20%

Note: Initiated by President Lyndon
Johnson in 1964, the War on Poverty
led to the creation of more than three     10%
dozen welfare programs to aid poor
persons. Government has spent $16.7
trillion on means-tested aid to the poor
since 1964.
                                            0%
Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census
Bureau, and National Center for Health        1930   1940   1950   1960   1970   1980   1990    2000   2010
Statistics.

                                                        Chart 1 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina      heritage.org
Death of Marriage in South Carolina, 1929–2010
  The marital birth rate—the              PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN TO MARRIED COUPLES
percentage of all births that occur
to married parents—is the flip side        100%
of the out-of-wedlock birth rate.
  Through most of the 20th cen-
tury, marital births were the norm
in South Carolina. In 1964, over
87 percent of births occurred to
married couples.                          80%

  However, in the mid-1960s, the
marital birth rate began to fall
steadily. By 2010, only 52.5 per-
cent of births in South Carolina
occurred to married couples.
                                          60%


                                                                                                          52.5%
Note: In any given year, the sum of the
out-of-wedlock birth rate (Chart 1)
and the marital birth rate (Chart 2)
equals 100 percent of all births.
                                          40%
Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census
Bureau, and National Center for Health       1930   1940   1950   1960   1970    1980   1990    2000 2010
Statistics.

                                                       Chart 2 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina     heritage.org
In South Carolina, Marriage Drops the Probability of Child Poverty
by 82 Percent
  The rapid rise in out-of-wedlock     PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN THAT ARE POOR
childbearing is a major cause of        50%
high levels of child poverty in
South Carolina.
                                                     40.9%
   Some 40.9 percent of single
                                        40%
mothers with children are poor
compared to 7.2 percent of mar-
ried couples with children.
   Single-parent families with          30%
children are nearly six times more
likely to be poor than families in
which the parents are married.          20%
  The higher poverty rate among
single-mother families is due both
to the lower education levels of
                                        10%                                           7.2%
the mothers and the lower income
due to the absence of the father.

                                         0%
                                                  Single-Parent,              Married,Two-Parent
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American             Female-Headed                      Families
Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.                    Families

                                                 Chart 3 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina   heritage.org
Nearly Four in Ten of All Families with Children in South Carolina
Are Not Married
Overall, married couples head
about six in ten families with
children in South Carolina. Over
39 percent are single-parent
families.


                                                             Unmarried
                                                              Families
                                                               39.1%
                                       Married
                                       Families
                                        60.9%




Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American
Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.

                                              Chart 4 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina   heritage.org
In South Carolina, 77 Percent of Poor Families with Children
Are Not Married
  Among poor families with
children in South Carolina, more
than three-quarters are not
married. By contrast, only 23.3
percent of poor families with                                 Married
children are headed by married                                Families
couples.                                                       23.3%



                                        Unmarried
                                         Families
                                          76.7%




Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American
Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.

                                       Chart 5 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina   heritage.org
In South Carolina Few Unwed Births Occur to Teenagers
  Out-of-wedlock births are             PERCENTAGE OF OUT-OF-WEDLOCK BIRTHS
often confused erroneously with         BY AGE OF MOTHER
teen births, but only 8.3 percent
of out-of-wedlock births in                                                Under
South Carolina occur to girls                                              Age 18:
under age 18.                                                               8.3%
  By contrast, some 78 percent                                Age
of out-of-wedlock births occur                               30–54:
to young adult women between                                 13.3%
the ages of 18 and 29.                                                                 Age
                                                                                      18–19:
                                                                                      16.7%
                                                    Age
                                                   25–29:
                                                   21.9%


                                                                          Age
                                                                         20–24:
                                                                         39.8%
Note: Figures have been rounded.

Source: U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS
data.

                                                  Chart 6 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina   heritage.org
Less Educated Women Are More Likely to Give Birth
Outside of Marriage
   Unwed childbearing occurs             PERCENTAGE OF BIRTHS THAT ARE MARITAL
most frequently among the                OR OUT OF WEDLOCK
women who will have the greatest         100%
                                                                                              9.7%        Unmarried
difficulty supporting children by                                                                          Mothers
themselves: those with low levels         90%
of education.                                                                 43.6%
                                          80%
   In South Carolina, among
                                                                62.1%
women who are high school drop-           70%
outs, about 73.8 percent of all                   73.8%
births occur outside marriage.            60%
Among women who have only a               50%
high school diploma, over 62                                                                              Married
                                                                                             90.3%
percent of all births occur outside       40%                                                             Mothers
marriage. By contrast, among                                                  56.4%
women with at least a college             30%
                                                                37.9%
degree, only 9.7 percent of births        20%
are out of wedlock.                               26.2%
                                          10%

                                           0%
                                                High School High School       Some         College        Mother’s
                                                 Dropout     Graduate        College       Graduate       education
Source: U.S. Department of Health and              (0–11        (12          (13–15          (16+         level
Human Services, Centers for Disease                Years)      Years)         Years)        Years)
Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS data.

                                                       Chart 7 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina    heritage.org
Both Marriage and Education Are Highly Effective in Reducing
Child Poverty in South Carolina
  The poverty rate of married          PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES                  Poverty Rate of Families by
couples with children is dramati-      WITH CHILDREN THAT                                                          Single
                                                                              Education and Marital Status
cally lower than the rate for house-   ARE POOR                                                                    Married
                                                                               of the Head of Household
holds headed by single parents.          80%
This is true even when the married
couple is compared to single par-        70%    67.1%
ents with the same education level.
                                         60%
  For example, in South Carolina,
the poverty rate for a single            50%
mother who has only a high                                         42.7%
school diploma is 42.7 percent,          40%
but the poverty rate for a married                                                    31.6%
couple family headed by an indi-         30%
vidual who, similarly, has only a                       23.5%
high school degree is far lower at       20%
9.4 percent.                                                                                            12.4%
                                         10%                               9.4%
  On average, marriage drops the                                                              4.7%
                                                                                                                 1.7%
poverty rate by about 79 percent          0%
among families with the same                    High School        High School           Some             College
education level.                                 Dropout            Graduate            College           Graduate

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American   Note: Virtually none of the heads of families in the chart who are high school
Community Survey, 2005–2009 data.      dropouts are minor teenagers.

                                                        Chart 8 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina         heritage.org
Unwed Birth Rates Vary Strongly by Race in South Carolina
  Out-of-wedlock childbearing           PERCENT OF BIRTHS THAT ARE OUT OF WEDLOCK
varies considerably by race.
                                        80%                                                       78.0%
  In 2008, 47.8 percent of births
in South Carolina occurred out-                                                           8.3%
side marriage. The rate was lowest      70%
among non-Hispanic whites at
about three in ten births (30.1         60%
percent). Among Hispanics, about
half of births were out of wedlock.                                              49.8%
                                        50%    47.8%
Among blacks, almost eight in ten
births were to unmarried women
(78 percent).                           40%
                                                               30.1%
                                        30%

                                        20%

                                        10%

                                         0%
Source: U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, Centers for Disease           All Races        White           Hispanic           Black
Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS                               Non-                               Non-
data.                                                         Hispanic                           Hispanic

                                                   Chart 9 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina   heritage.org
Growth of Unwed Childbearing by Race in South Carolina, 1934–2008
  Historically, out-of-wedlock           PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK
childbearing has been somewhat
                                         80%                                                                 Black Non-
more frequent among blacks than                                                                              Hispanic
among whites. However, prior to                                                                              78.0%
the onset of the federal                 70%
government’s War on Poverty in
1964, the rates for both whites and
blacks were comparatively low.           60%

  In 1964, around one in forty                                                                               Hispanic
(2.4 percent) white children were        50%                                                                 49.8%
born outside marriage. By 2008,
the number had risen to over three       40%
in ten (30.1 percent).
  In 1964, about one in four black                                                                           White Non-
                                         30%
children (27.4 percent) were born                                                                            Hispanic
                                                                                                             30.1%
outside marriage. By 2008, the
                                         20%
number had risen to over three in
four (78 percent).
                                         10%


                                         0%
Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census      1930   1940      1950   1960    1970   1980    1990   2000 2008
Bureau, and National Center for Health
Statistics.

                                                         Chart 10 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina     heritage.org
Racial Composition of All Births and Out-of-Wedlock Births
in South Carolina
   In South Carolina in 2008, some                ALL BIRTHS                       OUT-OF-WEDLOCK BIRTHS
55 percent of all births occurred to
non-Hispanic whites, 32.7 percent
occurred to non-Hispanic blacks,
and 9.9 percent occurred to His-
panics.                                                 55%                White Non-            34.6%
   Because blacks and Hispanics                                             Hispanic
are more likely to have children
without being married, they
account for disproportionately                                                                   10.3%
larger shares of all out-of-wedlock
births.
   In South Carolina in 2008, 34.6
percent of all non-marital births                      9.9%                 Hispanic
were to non-Hispanic whites, 53.4
percent were to black non-                                                                       53.4%
Hispanic women, and 10.3 percent
were to Hispanics.                                                         Black Non-
                                                       32.7%
                                                                             Hispanic

Source: U.S. Department of Health and                                      Asian/Other
Human Services, Centers for Disease                    2.4%                                      1.7%
Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS
data.                                   Note: Figures have been rounded.

                                                      Chart 11 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina   heritage.org
Non-Married White Families Are Six Times More Likely to Be Poor
in South Carolina
  Marriage leads to lower poverty      PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES THAT ARE POOR
rates for whites, blacks, and His-
panics.                                                                                24%
                                        25%
  For example, in 2009, the
poverty rate for married white
families in South Carolina was 3.8
percent. But the poverty rate for       20%
non-married white families was
more than six times higher at 24
percent.                                15%



                                        10%



                                         5%           3.8%



                                         0%
                                                Married Families             Non-Married Families
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American
Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.

                                                Chart 12 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina   heritage.org
Non-Married Black Families Are Four Times More Likely to Be Poor
in South Carolina
  In 2009, the poverty rate for        PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES THAT ARE POOR
married black couples in South
Carolina was 9 percent, while the                                                     38.6%
                                        40%
poverty rate for non-married black
families was four times higher at
38.6 percent.                           35%

                                        30%

                                        25%

                                        20%

                                        15%

                                        10%           9%

                                         5%

                                         0%
                                                Married Families             Non-Married Families
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American
Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.

                                                Chart 13 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina   heritage.org
Non-Married Hispanic Families Are About Three Times More Likely
to Be Poor in South Carolina
  In 2009, the poverty rate for        PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES THAT ARE POOR
Hispanic married families in South
Carolina was 18.4 percent, while                                                      49.9%
                                        50%
the poverty rate among non-
married families was almost three
times higher at 49.9 percent.
                                        40%



                                        30%



                                        20%          18.4%



                                        10%



                                         0%
                                                Married Families             Non-Married Families
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American
Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.

                                                Chart 14 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina   heritage.org
Three Steps to Reduce Child Poverty through Marriage

1) Provide information on the benefits of marriage in reducing child poverty
   and improving child well-being.

    Marriage is a highly effective institution which greatly decreases parental and child
  poverty while improving long-term outcomes for children. Conversely, the absence of
  marriage greatly increases welfare costs and imposes added burdens on taxpayers.
    Unfortunately, almost no information on these topics is available in low-income
  communities. This information deficit should be corrected in the following manner:

     • Explain the benefits of marriage in middle and high schools with a high
       proportion of at-risk youth;
     • Create public education campaigns in low-income communities on the
       benefits of marriage; and,
     • Require federally funded birth control clinics to provide information on the
       benefits of marriage and the skills needed to develop stable families to
       interested low-income clients.

2) Reduce anti-marriage penalties in means-tested welfare programs.

3) Promote life-goal-planning, marriage-strengthening, and divorce-reduction
   programs to increase healthy marriages and reduce divorce and separation.
The Family & Religion Initiative is one of 10 Transformational Initiatives making up The Heritage
Foundation’s Leadership for America campaign. For more products and information related to this initiative
or to learn more about the Leadership for America campaign, please visit heritage.org.




  The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a think tank—whose mission is to
formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited gov-
ernment, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.
  Our vision is to build an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity, and civil society flourish. As
conservatives, we believe the values and ideas that motivated our Founding Fathers are worth conserving.
As policy entrepreneurs, we believe the most effective solutions are consistent with those ideas and values.




                                     214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE • Washington, D.C. 20002 • (202) 546-4400 • heritage.org

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Tendances (20)

Marriage Poverty - South Carolina
Marriage Poverty - South CarolinaMarriage Poverty - South Carolina
Marriage Poverty - South Carolina
 
Marriage Poverty - Oklahoma
Marriage Poverty - OklahomaMarriage Poverty - Oklahoma
Marriage Poverty - Oklahoma
 
Marriage Poverty - Delaware
Marriage Poverty - DelawareMarriage Poverty - Delaware
Marriage Poverty - Delaware
 
Marriage & Poverty: West Virginia
Marriage & Poverty: West VirginiaMarriage & Poverty: West Virginia
Marriage & Poverty: West Virginia
 
Marriage Poverty - Alabama
Marriage Poverty - AlabamaMarriage Poverty - Alabama
Marriage Poverty - Alabama
 
Marriage Poverty - Indiana
Marriage Poverty - IndianaMarriage Poverty - Indiana
Marriage Poverty - Indiana
 
Marriage & Poverty: Mississippi
Marriage & Poverty: MississippiMarriage & Poverty: Mississippi
Marriage & Poverty: Mississippi
 
Marriage Poverty - Mississippi
Marriage Poverty - MississippiMarriage Poverty - Mississippi
Marriage Poverty - Mississippi
 
Marriage & Poverty: Utah
Marriage & Poverty: UtahMarriage & Poverty: Utah
Marriage & Poverty: Utah
 
Marriage & Poverty: Pennsylvania
Marriage & Poverty: PennsylvaniaMarriage & Poverty: Pennsylvania
Marriage & Poverty: Pennsylvania
 
Marriage and Poverty - West Virginia
Marriage and Poverty - West VirginiaMarriage and Poverty - West Virginia
Marriage and Poverty - West Virginia
 
Marriage & Poverty: Kentucky
Marriage & Poverty: KentuckyMarriage & Poverty: Kentucky
Marriage & Poverty: Kentucky
 
Marriage Poverty - Illinois
Marriage Poverty - IllinoisMarriage Poverty - Illinois
Marriage Poverty - Illinois
 
Marriage & Poverty: Florida
Marriage & Poverty: FloridaMarriage & Poverty: Florida
Marriage & Poverty: Florida
 
Marriage Poverty - Massachusetts
Marriage Poverty - MassachusettsMarriage Poverty - Massachusetts
Marriage Poverty - Massachusetts
 
Marriage & Poverty: Illinois
Marriage & Poverty: IllinoisMarriage & Poverty: Illinois
Marriage & Poverty: Illinois
 
Marriage Poverty - Rhode Island
Marriage Poverty - Rhode IslandMarriage Poverty - Rhode Island
Marriage Poverty - Rhode Island
 
Marriage & Poverty: Indiana
Marriage & Poverty: IndianaMarriage & Poverty: Indiana
Marriage & Poverty: Indiana
 
Marriage Poverty - South Dakota
Marriage Poverty - South DakotaMarriage Poverty - South Dakota
Marriage Poverty - South Dakota
 
Marriage Poverty - Iowa
Marriage Poverty - IowaMarriage Poverty - Iowa
Marriage Poverty - Iowa
 

Similaire à Marriage & Poverty: South Carolina

Similaire à Marriage & Poverty: South Carolina (20)

Marriage poverty - North Carolina
Marriage poverty - North CarolinaMarriage poverty - North Carolina
Marriage poverty - North Carolina
 
Marriage & Poverty: North Carolina
Marriage & Poverty: North CarolinaMarriage & Poverty: North Carolina
Marriage & Poverty: North Carolina
 
Marriage Poverty - North Dakota
Marriage Poverty - North DakotaMarriage Poverty - North Dakota
Marriage Poverty - North Dakota
 
Marriage & Poverty: North Dakota
Marriage & Poverty: North DakotaMarriage & Poverty: North Dakota
Marriage & Poverty: North Dakota
 
Marriage & Poverty: California
Marriage & Poverty: CaliforniaMarriage & Poverty: California
Marriage & Poverty: California
 
Marriage Poverty - Kansas
Marriage Poverty - KansasMarriage Poverty - Kansas
Marriage Poverty - Kansas
 
Marriage & Poverty: South Dakota
Marriage & Poverty: South DakotaMarriage & Poverty: South Dakota
Marriage & Poverty: South Dakota
 
Marriage & Poverty: Kansas
Marriage & Poverty: KansasMarriage & Poverty: Kansas
Marriage & Poverty: Kansas
 
Marriage Poverty - Arizona
Marriage Poverty - ArizonaMarriage Poverty - Arizona
Marriage Poverty - Arizona
 
Marriage & Poverty: Arizona
Marriage & Poverty: ArizonaMarriage & Poverty: Arizona
Marriage & Poverty: Arizona
 
Marriage & Poverty: Alabama
Marriage & Poverty: AlabamaMarriage & Poverty: Alabama
Marriage & Poverty: Alabama
 
Marriage & Poverty: Nevada
Marriage & Poverty: NevadaMarriage & Poverty: Nevada
Marriage & Poverty: Nevada
 
Marriage Poverty - Arkansas
Marriage Poverty - ArkansasMarriage Poverty - Arkansas
Marriage Poverty - Arkansas
 
Marriage & Poverty: Arkansas
Marriage & Poverty: ArkansasMarriage & Poverty: Arkansas
Marriage & Poverty: Arkansas
 
Marriage Poverty - Nevada
Marriage Poverty - NevadaMarriage Poverty - Nevada
Marriage Poverty - Nevada
 
Marriage & Poverty: Alaska
Marriage & Poverty: AlaskaMarriage & Poverty: Alaska
Marriage & Poverty: Alaska
 
Marriage Poverty - Alaska
Marriage Poverty - AlaskaMarriage Poverty - Alaska
Marriage Poverty - Alaska
 
Marriage & Poverty: Michigan
Marriage & Poverty: MichiganMarriage & Poverty: Michigan
Marriage & Poverty: Michigan
 
Marriage Poverty - Connecticut
Marriage Poverty - ConnecticutMarriage Poverty - Connecticut
Marriage Poverty - Connecticut
 
Marriage & Poverty: Connecticut
Marriage & Poverty: ConnecticutMarriage & Poverty: Connecticut
Marriage & Poverty: Connecticut
 

Plus de The Heritage Foundation

Tracking the States' Responses to Obamacare
Tracking the States' Responses to ObamacareTracking the States' Responses to Obamacare
Tracking the States' Responses to ObamacareThe Heritage Foundation
 

Plus de The Heritage Foundation (19)

Tracking the States' Responses to Obamacare
Tracking the States' Responses to ObamacareTracking the States' Responses to Obamacare
Tracking the States' Responses to Obamacare
 
Marriage Poverty - United States
Marriage Poverty - United StatesMarriage Poverty - United States
Marriage Poverty - United States
 
Marriage and Poverty - Wisconsin
Marriage and Poverty - WisconsinMarriage and Poverty - Wisconsin
Marriage and Poverty - Wisconsin
 
Marriage Poverty - Washington
Marriage Poverty - WashingtonMarriage Poverty - Washington
Marriage Poverty - Washington
 
Marriage Poverty - Vermont
Marriage Poverty - VermontMarriage Poverty - Vermont
Marriage Poverty - Vermont
 
Marriage Poverty - Texas
Marriage Poverty - TexasMarriage Poverty - Texas
Marriage Poverty - Texas
 
Marriage Poverty - Tennessee
Marriage Poverty - TennesseeMarriage Poverty - Tennessee
Marriage Poverty - Tennessee
 
Marriage Poverty - Pennsylvania
Marriage Poverty - PennsylvaniaMarriage Poverty - Pennsylvania
Marriage Poverty - Pennsylvania
 
Marriage Poverty - Oregon
Marriage Poverty - OregonMarriage Poverty - Oregon
Marriage Poverty - Oregon
 
Marriage Poverty - Ohio
Marriage Poverty - OhioMarriage Poverty - Ohio
Marriage Poverty - Ohio
 
Marriage Poverty - New York
Marriage Poverty - New YorkMarriage Poverty - New York
Marriage Poverty - New York
 
Marriage Poverty - New Mexico
Marriage Poverty - New MexicoMarriage Poverty - New Mexico
Marriage Poverty - New Mexico
 
Marriage Poverty - New Jersey
Marriage Poverty - New JerseyMarriage Poverty - New Jersey
Marriage Poverty - New Jersey
 
Marriage Poverty - New Hampshire
Marriage Poverty - New HampshireMarriage Poverty - New Hampshire
Marriage Poverty - New Hampshire
 
Marriage Poverty - Nebraska
Marriage Poverty - NebraskaMarriage Poverty - Nebraska
Marriage Poverty - Nebraska
 
Marriage Poverty - Montana
Marriage Poverty - MontanaMarriage Poverty - Montana
Marriage Poverty - Montana
 
Marriage Poverty - Missouri
Marriage Poverty - MissouriMarriage Poverty - Missouri
Marriage Poverty - Missouri
 
Marriage Poverty - Minnesota
Marriage Poverty - MinnesotaMarriage Poverty - Minnesota
Marriage Poverty - Minnesota
 
Marriage Poverty - Michigan
Marriage Poverty - MichiganMarriage Poverty - Michigan
Marriage Poverty - Michigan
 

Dernier

complaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfk
complaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfkcomplaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfk
complaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfkbhavenpr
 
Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.
Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.
Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.NaveedKhaskheli1
 
VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012
VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012
VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012ankitnayak356677
 
Manipur-Book-Final-2-compressed.pdfsal'rpk
Manipur-Book-Final-2-compressed.pdfsal'rpkManipur-Book-Final-2-compressed.pdfsal'rpk
Manipur-Book-Final-2-compressed.pdfsal'rpkbhavenpr
 
16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
Experience the Future of the Web3 Gaming Trend
Experience the Future of the Web3 Gaming TrendExperience the Future of the Web3 Gaming Trend
Experience the Future of the Web3 Gaming TrendFabwelt
 
Rohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for Justice
Rohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for JusticeRohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for Justice
Rohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for JusticeAbdulGhani778830
 
IndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global News
IndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global NewsIndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global News
IndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global NewsIndiaWest2
 
57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdf
57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdf57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdf
57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdfGerald Furnkranz
 
Quiz for Heritage Indian including all the rounds
Quiz for Heritage Indian including all the roundsQuiz for Heritage Indian including all the rounds
Quiz for Heritage Indian including all the roundsnaxymaxyy
 

Dernier (10)

complaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfk
complaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfkcomplaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfk
complaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfk
 
Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.
Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.
Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.
 
VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012
VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012
VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012
 
Manipur-Book-Final-2-compressed.pdfsal'rpk
Manipur-Book-Final-2-compressed.pdfsal'rpkManipur-Book-Final-2-compressed.pdfsal'rpk
Manipur-Book-Final-2-compressed.pdfsal'rpk
 
16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
Experience the Future of the Web3 Gaming Trend
Experience the Future of the Web3 Gaming TrendExperience the Future of the Web3 Gaming Trend
Experience the Future of the Web3 Gaming Trend
 
Rohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for Justice
Rohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for JusticeRohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for Justice
Rohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for Justice
 
IndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global News
IndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global NewsIndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global News
IndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global News
 
57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdf
57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdf57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdf
57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdf
 
Quiz for Heritage Indian including all the rounds
Quiz for Heritage Indian including all the roundsQuiz for Heritage Indian including all the rounds
Quiz for Heritage Indian including all the rounds
 

Marriage & Poverty: South Carolina

  • 1. Marriage: South Carolina’s No. 1 Weapon Against Childhood Poverty How the Collapse of Marriage Hurts Children and Three Steps to Reverse the Damage A Heritage Foundation Book of Charts • January 2012 Richard and Helen DeVos Center for Religion and Civil Society
  • 2. Growth of Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing in South Carolina, 1929–2010 Throughout most of South PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK Carolina’s history, out-of-wedlock childbearing was rare. 50% 47.5% When the federal government’s War on Poverty began in 1964, only 12.8 percent of children in 40% South Carolina were born out of wedlock. However, over the next four decades, the number rose rapidly. By 2010, 47.5 percent of 30% births in South Carolina occurred outside of marriage. 20% Note: Initiated by President Lyndon Johnson in 1964, the War on Poverty led to the creation of more than three 10% dozen welfare programs to aid poor persons. Government has spent $16.7 trillion on means-tested aid to the poor since 1964. 0% Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census Bureau, and National Center for Health 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Statistics. Chart 1 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina heritage.org
  • 3. Death of Marriage in South Carolina, 1929–2010 The marital birth rate—the PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN TO MARRIED COUPLES percentage of all births that occur to married parents—is the flip side 100% of the out-of-wedlock birth rate. Through most of the 20th cen- tury, marital births were the norm in South Carolina. In 1964, over 87 percent of births occurred to married couples. 80% However, in the mid-1960s, the marital birth rate began to fall steadily. By 2010, only 52.5 per- cent of births in South Carolina occurred to married couples. 60% 52.5% Note: In any given year, the sum of the out-of-wedlock birth rate (Chart 1) and the marital birth rate (Chart 2) equals 100 percent of all births. 40% Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census Bureau, and National Center for Health 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Statistics. Chart 2 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina heritage.org
  • 4. In South Carolina, Marriage Drops the Probability of Child Poverty by 82 Percent The rapid rise in out-of-wedlock PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN THAT ARE POOR childbearing is a major cause of 50% high levels of child poverty in South Carolina. 40.9% Some 40.9 percent of single 40% mothers with children are poor compared to 7.2 percent of mar- ried couples with children. Single-parent families with 30% children are nearly six times more likely to be poor than families in which the parents are married. 20% The higher poverty rate among single-mother families is due both to the lower education levels of 10% 7.2% the mothers and the lower income due to the absence of the father. 0% Single-Parent, Married,Two-Parent Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Female-Headed Families Community Survey, 2007–2009 data. Families Chart 3 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina heritage.org
  • 5. Nearly Four in Ten of All Families with Children in South Carolina Are Not Married Overall, married couples head about six in ten families with children in South Carolina. Over 39 percent are single-parent families. Unmarried Families 39.1% Married Families 60.9% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007–2009 data. Chart 4 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina heritage.org
  • 6. In South Carolina, 77 Percent of Poor Families with Children Are Not Married Among poor families with children in South Carolina, more than three-quarters are not married. By contrast, only 23.3 percent of poor families with Married children are headed by married Families couples. 23.3% Unmarried Families 76.7% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007–2009 data. Chart 5 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina heritage.org
  • 7. In South Carolina Few Unwed Births Occur to Teenagers Out-of-wedlock births are PERCENTAGE OF OUT-OF-WEDLOCK BIRTHS often confused erroneously with BY AGE OF MOTHER teen births, but only 8.3 percent of out-of-wedlock births in Under South Carolina occur to girls Age 18: under age 18. 8.3% By contrast, some 78 percent Age of out-of-wedlock births occur 30–54: to young adult women between 13.3% the ages of 18 and 29. Age 18–19: 16.7% Age 25–29: 21.9% Age 20–24: 39.8% Note: Figures have been rounded. Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS data. Chart 6 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina heritage.org
  • 8. Less Educated Women Are More Likely to Give Birth Outside of Marriage Unwed childbearing occurs PERCENTAGE OF BIRTHS THAT ARE MARITAL most frequently among the OR OUT OF WEDLOCK women who will have the greatest 100% 9.7% Unmarried difficulty supporting children by Mothers themselves: those with low levels 90% of education. 43.6% 80% In South Carolina, among 62.1% women who are high school drop- 70% outs, about 73.8 percent of all 73.8% births occur outside marriage. 60% Among women who have only a 50% high school diploma, over 62 Married 90.3% percent of all births occur outside 40% Mothers marriage. By contrast, among 56.4% women with at least a college 30% 37.9% degree, only 9.7 percent of births 20% are out of wedlock. 26.2% 10% 0% High School High School Some College Mother’s Dropout Graduate College Graduate education Source: U.S. Department of Health and (0–11 (12 (13–15 (16+ level Human Services, Centers for Disease Years) Years) Years) Years) Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS data. Chart 7 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina heritage.org
  • 9. Both Marriage and Education Are Highly Effective in Reducing Child Poverty in South Carolina The poverty rate of married PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES Poverty Rate of Families by couples with children is dramati- WITH CHILDREN THAT Single Education and Marital Status cally lower than the rate for house- ARE POOR Married of the Head of Household holds headed by single parents. 80% This is true even when the married couple is compared to single par- 70% 67.1% ents with the same education level. 60% For example, in South Carolina, the poverty rate for a single 50% mother who has only a high 42.7% school diploma is 42.7 percent, 40% but the poverty rate for a married 31.6% couple family headed by an indi- 30% vidual who, similarly, has only a 23.5% high school degree is far lower at 20% 9.4 percent. 12.4% 10% 9.4% On average, marriage drops the 4.7% 1.7% poverty rate by about 79 percent 0% among families with the same High School High School Some College education level. Dropout Graduate College Graduate Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Note: Virtually none of the heads of families in the chart who are high school Community Survey, 2005–2009 data. dropouts are minor teenagers. Chart 8 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina heritage.org
  • 10. Unwed Birth Rates Vary Strongly by Race in South Carolina Out-of-wedlock childbearing PERCENT OF BIRTHS THAT ARE OUT OF WEDLOCK varies considerably by race. 80% 78.0% In 2008, 47.8 percent of births in South Carolina occurred out- 8.3% side marriage. The rate was lowest 70% among non-Hispanic whites at about three in ten births (30.1 60% percent). Among Hispanics, about half of births were out of wedlock. 49.8% 50% 47.8% Among blacks, almost eight in ten births were to unmarried women (78 percent). 40% 30.1% 30% 20% 10% 0% Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease All Races White Hispanic Black Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS Non- Non- data. Hispanic Hispanic Chart 9 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina heritage.org
  • 11. Growth of Unwed Childbearing by Race in South Carolina, 1934–2008 Historically, out-of-wedlock PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK childbearing has been somewhat 80% Black Non- more frequent among blacks than Hispanic among whites. However, prior to 78.0% the onset of the federal 70% government’s War on Poverty in 1964, the rates for both whites and blacks were comparatively low. 60% In 1964, around one in forty Hispanic (2.4 percent) white children were 50% 49.8% born outside marriage. By 2008, the number had risen to over three 40% in ten (30.1 percent). In 1964, about one in four black White Non- 30% children (27.4 percent) were born Hispanic 30.1% outside marriage. By 2008, the 20% number had risen to over three in four (78 percent). 10% 0% Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2008 Bureau, and National Center for Health Statistics. Chart 10 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina heritage.org
  • 12. Racial Composition of All Births and Out-of-Wedlock Births in South Carolina In South Carolina in 2008, some ALL BIRTHS OUT-OF-WEDLOCK BIRTHS 55 percent of all births occurred to non-Hispanic whites, 32.7 percent occurred to non-Hispanic blacks, and 9.9 percent occurred to His- panics. 55% White Non- 34.6% Because blacks and Hispanics Hispanic are more likely to have children without being married, they account for disproportionately 10.3% larger shares of all out-of-wedlock births. In South Carolina in 2008, 34.6 percent of all non-marital births 9.9% Hispanic were to non-Hispanic whites, 53.4 percent were to black non- 53.4% Hispanic women, and 10.3 percent were to Hispanics. Black Non- 32.7% Hispanic Source: U.S. Department of Health and Asian/Other Human Services, Centers for Disease 2.4% 1.7% Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS data. Note: Figures have been rounded. Chart 11 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina heritage.org
  • 13. Non-Married White Families Are Six Times More Likely to Be Poor in South Carolina Marriage leads to lower poverty PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES THAT ARE POOR rates for whites, blacks, and His- panics. 24% 25% For example, in 2009, the poverty rate for married white families in South Carolina was 3.8 percent. But the poverty rate for 20% non-married white families was more than six times higher at 24 percent. 15% 10% 5% 3.8% 0% Married Families Non-Married Families Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007–2009 data. Chart 12 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina heritage.org
  • 14. Non-Married Black Families Are Four Times More Likely to Be Poor in South Carolina In 2009, the poverty rate for PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES THAT ARE POOR married black couples in South Carolina was 9 percent, while the 38.6% 40% poverty rate for non-married black families was four times higher at 38.6 percent. 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 9% 5% 0% Married Families Non-Married Families Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007–2009 data. Chart 13 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina heritage.org
  • 15. Non-Married Hispanic Families Are About Three Times More Likely to Be Poor in South Carolina In 2009, the poverty rate for PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES THAT ARE POOR Hispanic married families in South Carolina was 18.4 percent, while 49.9% 50% the poverty rate among non- married families was almost three times higher at 49.9 percent. 40% 30% 20% 18.4% 10% 0% Married Families Non-Married Families Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007–2009 data. Chart 14 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina heritage.org
  • 16. Three Steps to Reduce Child Poverty through Marriage 1) Provide information on the benefits of marriage in reducing child poverty and improving child well-being. Marriage is a highly effective institution which greatly decreases parental and child poverty while improving long-term outcomes for children. Conversely, the absence of marriage greatly increases welfare costs and imposes added burdens on taxpayers. Unfortunately, almost no information on these topics is available in low-income communities. This information deficit should be corrected in the following manner: • Explain the benefits of marriage in middle and high schools with a high proportion of at-risk youth; • Create public education campaigns in low-income communities on the benefits of marriage; and, • Require federally funded birth control clinics to provide information on the benefits of marriage and the skills needed to develop stable families to interested low-income clients. 2) Reduce anti-marriage penalties in means-tested welfare programs. 3) Promote life-goal-planning, marriage-strengthening, and divorce-reduction programs to increase healthy marriages and reduce divorce and separation.
  • 17. The Family & Religion Initiative is one of 10 Transformational Initiatives making up The Heritage Foundation’s Leadership for America campaign. For more products and information related to this initiative or to learn more about the Leadership for America campaign, please visit heritage.org. The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a think tank—whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited gov- ernment, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Our vision is to build an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity, and civil society flourish. As conservatives, we believe the values and ideas that motivated our Founding Fathers are worth conserving. As policy entrepreneurs, we believe the most effective solutions are consistent with those ideas and values. 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE • Washington, D.C. 20002 • (202) 546-4400 • heritage.org