SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  11
Stephen Toulmin was a British Philosopher,
   Author, and educator, who wanted to develop
   arguments that can be used to evaluate the
   ethics behind moral issues. He created a model
   which was used in the field of rhetoric called
   the Toulmin model of argumentation.
   In an effort to break down to the core of an
    argument, Toulmin created the Toulmin
    model in which he uses a six component
    diagram where he describes step by step the
    validity of an argument.
   The Toulmin model helps to show how tightly
    constructed arguments are and how each part
    of an argument relates to the overall validity or
    reasonableness of that argument
   The claim or Thesis is what you are trying to
    get the other person to except
   Example abortion should be banned
   Grounds are the evidence, proves and data you
    have collected to support your claim.
   Example all babies have a right to live
   The warrant links the claim and the evidence. It
    usually begins with words like all, every, any,
    or whenever. It contains mathematical
    formulas, universal laws of nature, rule of
    thumb, etc.
   Example There is a lack of adoptable babies
    because abortion is legal. The percentage of
    infants given up for adoption has declines from
    9% to 1% between 1996 to 2002.
   Backing means giving additional information
    to support the warrant.
   Example if abortion was banned, women
    would be more responsible and use
    contraceptives and not turn to abortion in case
    of an unplanned pregnancy.
   The qualifier is the strength of the data. It
    includes words such as most, usually, or most
    likely.
   Example most women who have had an
    abortion, have felt regret and sadness.
   The rebuttal is a counter argument used to
    present the argument. The “ unlesses” to the
    warrant.
   Example abortion is inhuman and it should not
    be used unless in cases that involve rape.
   Abortion. Procon.org
   Changing
    minds.org/decipline/argument/making_agu
    ment/tooulmin.html

Contenu connexe

Similaire à The toulmin model of argument tato

Similaire à The toulmin model of argument tato (11)

Claims 5 types Abridged.ppt
Claims 5 types Abridged.pptClaims 5 types Abridged.ppt
Claims 5 types Abridged.ppt
 
Claims 3 types.pptx
Claims 3 types.pptxClaims 3 types.pptx
Claims 3 types.pptx
 
academic writing class notes.docx
academic writing class notes.docxacademic writing class notes.docx
academic writing class notes.docx
 
Argumentive Essays
Argumentive EssaysArgumentive Essays
Argumentive Essays
 
Fallacies (2).pdf
Fallacies (2).pdfFallacies (2).pdf
Fallacies (2).pdf
 
Lecture 2 arguments
Lecture 2  argumentsLecture 2  arguments
Lecture 2 arguments
 
Lesson 2 methods of philosophizing
Lesson 2 methods of philosophizingLesson 2 methods of philosophizing
Lesson 2 methods of philosophizing
 
Running head ABORTION RIGHTS Abortion Rights First.docx
Running head ABORTION RIGHTS  Abortion Rights First.docxRunning head ABORTION RIGHTS  Abortion Rights First.docx
Running head ABORTION RIGHTS Abortion Rights First.docx
 
Competencies rcn workbook
Competencies rcn workbookCompetencies rcn workbook
Competencies rcn workbook
 
Online Philosophy Assignment Help
Online Philosophy Assignment HelpOnline Philosophy Assignment Help
Online Philosophy Assignment Help
 
Claims 5 types Abridged.ppt
Claims 5 types Abridged.pptClaims 5 types Abridged.ppt
Claims 5 types Abridged.ppt
 

The toulmin model of argument tato

  • 1.
  • 2. Stephen Toulmin was a British Philosopher, Author, and educator, who wanted to develop arguments that can be used to evaluate the ethics behind moral issues. He created a model which was used in the field of rhetoric called the Toulmin model of argumentation.
  • 3. In an effort to break down to the core of an argument, Toulmin created the Toulmin model in which he uses a six component diagram where he describes step by step the validity of an argument.  The Toulmin model helps to show how tightly constructed arguments are and how each part of an argument relates to the overall validity or reasonableness of that argument
  • 4.
  • 5. The claim or Thesis is what you are trying to get the other person to except  Example abortion should be banned
  • 6. Grounds are the evidence, proves and data you have collected to support your claim.  Example all babies have a right to live
  • 7. The warrant links the claim and the evidence. It usually begins with words like all, every, any, or whenever. It contains mathematical formulas, universal laws of nature, rule of thumb, etc.  Example There is a lack of adoptable babies because abortion is legal. The percentage of infants given up for adoption has declines from 9% to 1% between 1996 to 2002.
  • 8. Backing means giving additional information to support the warrant.  Example if abortion was banned, women would be more responsible and use contraceptives and not turn to abortion in case of an unplanned pregnancy.
  • 9. The qualifier is the strength of the data. It includes words such as most, usually, or most likely.  Example most women who have had an abortion, have felt regret and sadness.
  • 10. The rebuttal is a counter argument used to present the argument. The “ unlesses” to the warrant.  Example abortion is inhuman and it should not be used unless in cases that involve rape.
  • 11. Abortion. Procon.org  Changing minds.org/decipline/argument/making_agu ment/tooulmin.html