![38th List: The TOP10
Rmax Power
Rank Site Manufacturer Computer Country Cores
[Pflops] [MW]
RIKEN Advanced K Computer
1 Institute for Fujitsu SPARC64 VIIIfx 2.0GHz, Japan 795,024 10.51 12.66
Computational Science Tofu Interconnect
National Tianhe-1A
2 SuperComputer Center NUDT NUDT TH MPP, China 186,368 2.566 4.04
in Tianjin Xeon 6C, NVidia, FT-1000 8C
Oak Ridge National Jaguar
3 Cray USA 224,162 1.759 6.95
Laboratory Cray XT5, HC 2.6 GHz
National Nebulae
4 Supercomputing Centre Dawning TC3600 Blade, Intel X5650, China 120,640 1.271 2.58
in Shenzhen NVidia Tesla C2050 GPU
TSUBAME-2
GSIC, Tokyo Institute of
5 NEC/HP HP ProLiant, Xeon 6C, NVidia, Japan 73,278 1.192 1.40
Technology
Linux/Windows
Cielo
6 DOE/NNSA/LANL/SNL Cray USA 142,272 1.110 3.98
Cray XE6, 8C 2.4 GHz
NASA/Ames Research Pleiades
7 SGI USA 111,104 1.088 4.10
Center/NAS SGI Altix ICE 8200EX/8400EX
DOE/SC/ Hopper
8 Cray USA 153,408 1.054 2.91
LBNL/NERSC Cray XE6, 6C 2.1 GHz
Commissariat a Tera 100
9 l'Energie Atomique Bull Bull bullx super-node France 138.368 1.050 4.59
(CEA) S6010/S6030
Roadrunner
10 DOE/NNSA/LANL IBM USA 122,400 1.042 2.34
BladeCenter QS22/LS21]()
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
En vedette
En vedette (18)
Similaire à Top500 11/2011 BOF Slides
Similaire à Top500 11/2011 BOF Slides (20)
Plus de top500
Dernier
Dernier (20)
Top500 11/2011 BOF Slides
- 1. Highlights of the 38th TOP500 List SC11, Seattle, WA
- 2. 38th List: The TOP10 Rmax Power Rank Site Manufacturer Computer Country Cores [Pflops] [MW] RIKEN Advanced K Computer 1 Institute for Fujitsu SPARC64 VIIIfx 2.0GHz, Japan 795,024 10.51 12.66 Computational Science Tofu Interconnect National Tianhe-1A 2 SuperComputer Center NUDT NUDT TH MPP, China 186,368 2.566 4.04 in Tianjin Xeon 6C, NVidia, FT-1000 8C Oak Ridge National Jaguar 3 Cray USA 224,162 1.759 6.95 Laboratory Cray XT5, HC 2.6 GHz National Nebulae 4 Supercomputing Centre Dawning TC3600 Blade, Intel X5650, China 120,640 1.271 2.58 in Shenzhen NVidia Tesla C2050 GPU TSUBAME-2 GSIC, Tokyo Institute of 5 NEC/HP HP ProLiant, Xeon 6C, NVidia, Japan 73,278 1.192 1.40 Technology Linux/Windows Cielo 6 DOE/NNSA/LANL/SNL Cray USA 142,272 1.110 3.98 Cray XE6, 8C 2.4 GHz NASA/Ames Research Pleiades 7 SGI USA 111,104 1.088 4.10 Center/NAS SGI Altix ICE 8200EX/8400EX DOE/SC/ Hopper 8 Cray USA 153,408 1.054 2.91 LBNL/NERSC Cray XE6, 6C 2.1 GHz Commissariat a Tera 100 9 l'Energie Atomique Bull Bull bullx super-node France 138.368 1.050 4.59 (CEA) S6010/S6030 Roadrunner 10 DOE/NNSA/LANL IBM USA 122,400 1.042 2.34 BladeCenter QS22/LS21
- 3. 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Replacement Rate 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 195
- 4. Annual Performance Increase of the TOP500 2.6 2.4 2.2 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1
- 5. Performance Development 74.2 PFlop/s 100 Pflop/s 10000000 10.51 PFlop/s 10000000 10 Pflop/s 1000000 1 Pflop/s 100000 50.9 TFlop/s 100 Tflop/s SUM 10000 10 Tflop/s N=1 1 1000 Tflop/s 1.17 TFlop/s 100 100 Gflop/s 59.7 GFlop/s 10 N=500 10 Gflop/s 1 1 Gflop/s 0.1 400 MFlop/s 100 Mflop/s 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2011
- 6. Projected Performance Development 1E+11 1E+10 11E+09 Eflop/s 100 Pflop/s 10000000 10 Pflop/s 10000000 SUM 1 Pflop/s 1000000 100000 100 Tflop/s 10000 10 Tflop/s N=1 1000 1 Tflop/s 100 100 Gflop/s N=500 10 10 Gflop/s 1 1 Gflop/s 0.1 100 Mflop/s 2020 1996 2002 2008 2014
- 7. Performance of Countries 100,000 US 10,000 Total Performance [Tflop/s] EU Japan 1,000 China 100 Others 10 1 0 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
- 8. Vendors / System Share Oracle Others IBM Appro 8 Dell 46 HP 13 2% 11 9% 3% 2% Cray Inc. IBM SGI Bull 223 15 45% Bull 3% SGI Appro 17 Dell 3% Oracle Cray Inc. 27 HP Others 5% 140 28%
- 9. Vendors (TOP50) / System Share Cray Inc. IBM SGI Others 14 Cray Inc. Oracle 28% 17 Bull 34% Others Bull 3 6% SGI IBM 4 9 Oracle 18% 8% 3 6%
- 10. IBM Cray Fujitsu HP
- 11. IBM Cray Fujitsu HP
- 12. IBM Cray Fujitsu HP
- 13. New Systems IBM Cray Fujitsu HP
- 14. Previous Systems IBM Cray Fujitsu HP
- 15. New Systems – 6 Month IBM Cray Fujitsu HP
- 16. New Systems – 12 Month IBM Cray Fujitsu HP
- 17. Countries / System Share Russia others United States 2% 11% China France Germany 5% United States United Kingdom 53% Japan Japan 5% France United Russia Kingdom 5% others China Germany 13% 6%
- 18. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Asian Countries 2009 2010 2011 India China Japan Others Korea, South
- 19. European Countries 200 180 Others 160 Poland 140 Russia 120 Spain Systems 100 Sweden 80 Switzerland 60 Netherlands Italy 40 France 20 United Kingdom 0 Germany 2011 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
- 21. IBM Cray Fujitsu HP
- 22. Processors / Systems Xeon X56xx (Westmere-EP) 1% 1% Xeon X55xx (Nehalem-EP) 1% 9% Xeon E56xx (Westmere-EP) 1% Xeon E55xx (Nehalem-EP) 2% 2% Opteron 12 Core 3% Xeon 5400-series "Harpertown" 39% Opteron Quad Core 3% POWER6 3% POWER7 4% Intel Xeon E5 Opteron 8 Core 5% Opteron 6200 Series 8% PowerPC 450 9% Xeon L55xx (Nehalem-EP) 9% Power BQC others
- 23. Processors / Performance Xeon X56xx (Westmere-EP) 1% SPARC64 VIIIfx 1% 2% 2% 7% Xeon X55xx (Nehalem-EP) 2% Opteron 12 Core Xeon E56xx (Westmere-EP) 2% 27% Xeon 5400-series "Harpertown" 3% Intel Xeon E5 Opteron Six Core 3% Opteron 6200 Series 3% Xeon E55xx (Nehalem-EP) 3% Opteron 8 Core PowerPC 450 3% Opteron Quad Core 4% 14% POWER7 Power BQC 4% Xeon 75xx (Nehalem-EX) 4% 4% 6% 6% PowerXCell 8i POWER6 ShenWei
- 24. Total Core Count
- 25. Cores/Processor
- 26. Cores per Socket 500 450 400 16 350 12 300 10 Systems 250 9 200 8 150 6 4 100 2 50 1 0 2007 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011
- 27. Cores per Socket 174 1 core 5 2 cores 1 4 cores 19 6 cores 34 8 cores 26 9 cores 2 37 10 cores 2 12 cores 234 16 cores
- 28. Accelerators 40 35 30 25 Clearspeed CSX60022 Systems ATI GPU 20 IBM PowerXCell 8i 15 NVIDIA 2070 10 NVIDIA 20502 NVIDIA 2090 5 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
- 29. Performance of Accelerators 12,000 Clearspeed CSX600 10,000 Total Performance [Tflop/s] ATI GPU 8,000 IBM PowerXCell 8i NVIDIA 20702 6,000 NVIDIA 2090 NVIDIA 2050 4,000 2,000 0
- 32. Linpack Efficiency 120% 100% Linpack Efficiency 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0 100 200 300 400 500
- 33. Absolute Power Levels 13 12 11 10 Power [MWatts] 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 TOP500 Rank
- 34. Power Consumption 5 TOP10 4 Power [MW] 3 TOP50 2 1 TOP500 0 2008 2009 2010 2011
- 35. Power Efficiency 700 Linpack/Power [Gflops/kW] 600 500 TOP10 400 TOP50 300 200 TOP500 100 0 2008 2009 2010 2011
- 36. Most Power Efficient Architectures Rmax/ Computer Power BlueGene/Q, Power BQC 16C 1.60 GHz, Custom 2,026 Bullx B505, Xeon E5649 6C 2.53GHz, Infiniband QDR, NVIDIA 2090 1,266 Mole-8.5 Cluster, Xeon X5520 4C 2.27 GHz, Infiniband QDR, NVIDIA 919 2050 iDataPlex DX360M3, Xeon E5645 6C 2.40 GHz, Infiniband QDR, NVIDIA 892 2070 Xtreme-X GreenBlade GB512X, Xeon E5 (Sandy Bridge - EP) 8C 889 2.60GHz, Infiniband QDR iDataPlex DX360M3, Xeon X5650 6C 2.66 GHz, Infiniband, NVIDIA 2090 866 HP ProLiant SL390s G7 Xeon 6C X5670, Nvidia GPU, Linux/Windows 852 K computer, SPARC64 VIIIfx 2.0GHz, Tofu interconnect 830 Sunway BlueLight MPP, ShenWei processor SW1600 975.00 MHz, 741 Infiniband QDR [Mflops/Watt]
- 38. Power Efficiency 2,500 BlueGene/Q Linpack/Power [Gflops/kW] 2,000 Max-Efficiency 1,500 Cell K computer 1,000 500 TOP10 TOP50 0 TOP500 2008 2009 2010 2011
Notes de l'éditeur
- Annual versus Moore’s Law1.85 versus 1.59
- Fujitsu, Dell, and Dawning have 2 each
- Core-count per system
- Some very high efficiency systems use TurboBoost – wrong peak!
- #123 is ASCI Purple = older technology = less power efficient
- K computer: "K" here draws upon the Japanese word "Kei" for 1016(ten quadrillions), representing the system's performance goal of 10 petaflops. In its original sense, "Kei" expresses a large gateway in Japanese, and it is hoped that the system will be a new gateway to computational science.