Antimicrobial Resistance: Do We Know Everything? - Dr. Sid Thakur, Assistant Professor, North Carolina State University, from the 2013 NIAA Merging Values and Technology conference, April 15-17, 2013, Louisville, KY, USA.
More presentations at http://www.trufflemedia.com/agmedia/conference/2013-niaa-merging-values-and-technology
5. Pathogen Evolution:
How good bacteria go bad
Difference between good and bad pathogen
Few genes encoded on plasmids or chromosome
E. coli (commensal) : E. coli O157: H7 (HUS)
Stephens & Murray, Current Biology, 2001 Raskin et al., Cell, 2006
6. EID Global Trends1940-2004
EID are dominated by zoonoses (60.3 %)
Jones et al.,
Nature, 2008
Drug
Resistant
Zoonotic
Wildlife
7. NDM-1 (New Delhi metallo- β- Lactamase)
Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae
Dec 2009 in India; Pakistan, US, UK, Japan, Brazil
International Travel
Emergence of a new AR
mechanism in India
Number of cases by Country
Sweden (Dec 2009): 1st report
India (March 2010): 1st report
USA (June 2010): 3 cases
India (June 2010): More cases
UK (Aug 2010): 37 cases
Canada (Aug 2010): 1st report
Japan (Sept 2010): 1 report
All the patients had a travel history to
India within the past one year
9. Back to susceptible population:
Is it so simple?
Antimicrobial
Resistant
Antimicrobial
Susceptible
Antimicrobial
Exposure
Treatment
Environment
Treatment
Treatment
Antimicrobial
Resistant
Antimicrobial
Resistant
10. Reservoirs of Antimicrobial
Resistance determinants
Focus is on the commodity
Food animals, produce, humans
Role of Environment
• Limited research conducted
• Need to focus more on the environment
• Study environmental reservoirs
• Food animals: Farm environment (lagoon, truck, lairage)
• Produce: Water for irrigation, birds, manure
• Humans: Hospital environment, community
13. Role of trucks in
Pathogen dissemination
All in all out swine production system
Four truck wash systems were selected that
service one integrated system.
– Samples obtained from each wash station
• 10 trucks pre-wash, 5 swabs from each
• 10 trucks post-wash, 5 swabs from each
Fecal samples were also collected on farm, at
slaughter (Cecal content & MLN) & lairage
Applied Environmental Microbiology, 2009
Breeding/Farrowing Nursery Finishing
14. Role of Truck Wash
in Pathogen Dissemination
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
%Positive
Truck Wash A Truck Wash B Truck Wash C Truck Wash D
Truck Wash Salmonella Prevalence - Pre and Post Wash
Pre Wash
Post Wash
A = recycled water and Virkon-S B = recycled water and phenol
C = fresh water, soap, and phenol D = recycled water and phenol
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
%Positive
Truck Wash A Truck Wash B Truck Wash C Truck Wash D
Truck Wash Campylobacter Prevalence - Pre and Post Wash
Pre Wash
Post Wash
Salmonella and Campylobacter isolates
at farm were different from those isolated
at the slaughter plant (Cecal content and MLN)
Isolates from the Cecum and MLN were
similar to those isolated from the truck floor
22. NARMS Retail meat (Poultry)
Antimicrobial Resistance Data
C. jejuni
CIP/NAL
23. Are resistant pathogens are
better fit to survive in vivo ?
Luo, et al., PNAS, 2005
No Fluoroquinolone (FQ) selection pressure in this model
FQ sensitive
C. jejuni
FQ resistant
C. jejuni
FQ sensitive
and FQ resistant
C. jejuni
FQ sensitive
C. jejuni
FQ resistant
C. jejuni
FQ resistant
C. jejuni
24. Antibiotic Exposed Antibiotic-free (ABF)
Use of antimicrobials
Intensive
Indoor
No use of antimicrobials
Extensive
Outdoor
USDA-NIFA Study
Salmonella, Campylobacter & Clostridium
VS
26. Antimicrobial Free System
water, feed, swabs,
soil (n=5 each)
Lariage
Truck (n=5 each)
Environment at Farm and Slaughter
water, feed, swabs,
soil (n=5 each)
water, feed, swabs,
soil (n=5 each)
Farrowing—Nursery--
Finishing
Rotate on
new land
SlaughterTruck
• Post evis
• MLN
• Post chill
8 cohorts
35 pigs/cohort
27. Antimicrobials
AZI CIP ERY GEN TET FFN NAL TEL CLI MDR
Resistance%
0
20
40
60
80
100
ABF
Conventional
Pig v/s Environment
Antimicrobials
AZI CIP ERY GEN TET FFN NAL TEL CLI MDRResistance%
0
20
40
60
80
100
ABF
Conventional
EnvironmentSwine
AZI = azithromycin, ERY = erythromycin, CIP = ciprofloxacin , GEN = gentamicin, TET =
tetracycline, FFN = florfenicol, NAL = nalidixic acid, TEL = telithromycin, CLI = clindamycin;
Macarena and Thakur, Applied Environmental Microbiology, 2012
28. Key Outcomes
Campylobacter and C. difficile
Pig
Environment
Antimicrobial
Exposed
Antimicrobial
free (ABF)
Antimicrobial
Resistant
Strains
Antimicrobial
Resistant
Strains
29. C. coli Population Tree
ABF pigs and carcass
ABF env at farm and slg.
Conv pigs and carcass
Conv env at farm and slg.
ST-5776
ST-854
ST-1068
ST-1186
30. Phylogenetics
Clustering of STs
Conventional system
ABF system
Prod. System Unique STs
ABF 14
Conventional 32
ST-5764
ST-5770, ST-
1827, ST-
1109, ST-5772
ST-5248
Macarena and Thakur, PLOS ONE, 2012
31. Clostridium difficile AR Profile
Antimicrobials
TET AMP MET ERY CIP VAN MDR
Resistance%
0
20
40
60
80
100
ABF
CONVENTIONALFarm
Antimicrobials
TET AMP MET ERY CIP VAN MDRResistance%
0
20
40
60
80
100
ABF
CONVENTIONALEnvironment
AMP: Ampicillin; CIP: Ciprofloxacin; ERY: Erythromycin; MET: Metronidazole;
TET: Tetracycline; VAN: Vancomycin; MDR: Multidrug Resistance
Susick and Thakur, Veterinary Microbiology, 2012
37. Summary
• Move away from a generalized discussion on
antimicrobial resistance solution
• Pathogen ecological niche: specific
environment
• Renew focus on the role of environment
• Antimicrobial resistance is a global problem