Peter Ramsden gave an overview on the process and scope of social innovation. He pointed out the essential role of the public sector and emphasised the need to involve all the stakeholders – above all the target group – and to focus on results. Part of his presentation also focused on the chances of innovative financing.
7. New challenges: The future labour
market
• No job for life
• Not much security (zero hours contracts, yet more
flexibility)
• under-employment
• Self-employment an option at key transitions (from
education to employment, from employment to
retirement)
• Patching a portfolio of jobs and personal projects
(subsidising what you want to do with what you have
to do)
• Certain groups will struggle – migrants, lone parents,
youth, and disabled
8. • ‘Social innovations are new ideas (products,
services and models) that simultaneously
meet social needs (more effectively than
alternatives) and create new social
relationships or collaborations.
• In other words they are innovations that are
not only good for society but also enhance
society’s capacity to act.’ YF, SIX 2010
Defining social innovation: a new
concept (for an old idea)
10. shifts from:
– random innovation to a conscious and systematic approach
to public sector renewal
– managing human resources to building innovation capacity
– running tasks and projects to orchestrating processes of co-
creation
– administration to leading innovation
(Christian Bason 2010 Public Sector Innovation Polity Press)
Key role for public sector
13. • Co-everything – co-creation, co-design co-
production, co-management, co-ownership
• Open rather than closed approach to the sharing
and ownership of knowledge
• Demand-led rather than supply driven
• Designed ‘solutions’ – many prototypes
• Tailored rather than mass produced,
• solutions have to be adapted to local
circumstances
No single method
14. The aggregation of marginal gains
• Electronic reception Check-in
• Text messaging of Appointments
offering cancellation
• Smart phone apps for job
opportunities
15. Copenhagen youth employment centre: Co-ownership
with the young people
• Use of anthropologist to improve understanding of needs of young people
and perception of job centre
• Introduction of hosts in welcome area
• The prototype ’Welcome to ckb. Your personal travel guide’ information
about job centre, regulations, opportunities and data about their counselor.
• ckb uses user stories
– portraits and narratives, so the
new users of the house know,
what to expect.
• five innovation vectors:
– progress,
– expertise,
– visibility,
– seriousness and
– transparency,
16.
17. New financing: funny money
micro finance, micro credit and peer to
peer (e.g. Kiva)
diaspora finance
Alternative currencies – time banks, air
miles, LETS local exchange trading systems,
points money, internet money
Impact investing and exotic products like
Social Impact Bonds
Crowd funding
Challenges (e.g. Bloomberg challenge)
18. System change
• Reframing the question
• Moving from ‘end-of-pipe’
• Focusing on results (not outputs)
19. Follow the Money: Swindon’s family analysis
Title of presentation I I Page
19
21. Think outside the box: data sharing
Cardiff Accident and emergency 40% reduction in
serious injury admissions by geo coding and data
sharing
22. Better (maybe bigger) data
• Online tools for users
• Real time data for
analysts and citizens
• Understanding other
aspects of the clients
• Moving beyond
claimant categories
• Next step – mixing with
other data
23. Examples: Microfinance
– Fair Finance in London providing
personal loans, business loans
and financial advice
– Permicro, in Turin - established
microfinance practitioner
operating in Northern Italy. Focus
on socially excluded
communities, Now operating in
12 cities
– NEEM in Sweden - supports
migrants to go into self
employment, backed by ERDF.
24. Crowd funding
What is it?
Is it new? Mark Twain, Beethoven,
Mozart used crowd funding
Can it replace bank finance for
start-ups
25. Facts on kickstarter
a for profit platform for funding
independent creative projects: films,
games, music, art, design, and
technology.
4.9 million have people pledged $800
million, funding 49,000 creative projects
over 4 years
Funding on Kickstarter is all-or-nothing
44% of projects have reached their
funding goals.
Creators keep ownership of their work.
26. Social Impact Bonds SIBS
A public private financial circuit
Bond holders get a return if they achieve target social
impacts
Peterborough Prison Bond is first example aimed to
reduce recidivism on short term sentences from over 60%
Reduction by 7.5% over 5 years to achieve return
‘Through the door’ services delivered by two social
enterprises (St Giles and Ormiston). Main advantage is
long term funding
£5million initial offering mostly raised from trusts
New bonds for reducing street homelessness in London,
recidivism at Rikers island prison, pre school provision in
Utah, investing in success on East coast
27. SIBs: A Faustian pact?
Efficiency and
effectiveness
Virtous: Finance
follows results
Complexity
Transparency &
accountability
28. How to judge whether new
finance will be good?
Is it transparent? Is it accountable?
Do you understand it? Will others?
Does it meet real human needs?
what types of projects does it deliver on
the ground?
Who benefits and who loses?
How long will it take to set up?
Should you do this? (legally, morally,
practically, financially)
29. Judging the results
• Randomised control groups are
OECD ‘gold standard’
• Used in social experiments (see jpal
europe
• Qualitative results are also
important and harder to measure
• Value for money and social return
on investment are key measures
30. Social innovation can make a major
contribution to labour market policies
Involving users and front-line
staff often combined with
designers is a key part of the
method
Marginal gains can make a
contribution but sometimes
systemic change is required
Finance can drive innovation
especially when linked to results
But metrics are slippery and
need careful calibration
Scaling is harder than spreading
Beware of ‘technocratic
solutionism’
31. Thank you for your attention!
Peterramsden2@gmail.com
Notes de l'éditeur
This is one of the images included in evidence given by one of the Social Innovation workstream cities. Any idea what it shows? This is a record of public sector interventions with a single family over an 18 year period. It comes from Swindon (UK) which found that it was spending around €300,000 per annum per struggling family without any measurable impact. On the contrary, the interventions were found to disempower the families and to do nothing to break cycles of disadvantage where the children were not missing school, more likely to engage in delinquent activity and be at high risk of becoming NEET. In response, Swindon completely re-engineered its services – based on a coproduction model working with the families. A central element of this change process was a rethink of the role of the municipality – partly because its traditional function was under extreme pressure due to financial constraints and the increased demand for services. Other cities providing evidence to our workstream – including Barcelona, Riga, Copenhagen, Berlin and Nantes – confirmed the Swindon message. We need to use our resources much more effectively to support young people – this requires new trusted relationships with them (often involving youth-led NGOs), inspirational leadership and a willingness to innovate and to take risks. In short, it needs a new set of behaviours from local authorities.