Joshua Bishop from WWF Australia presented at the UNAA Sustainable Consumption and Production Seminar held on 27 June 2013 hosted by Russell Kennedy, Melbourne.
Held in support of the United Nations 10 Year Framework of Programmes on Sustainable Consumption and Production Patterns, the seminar brought together experts and practitioners from across business, government and civil society to provide a platform for shared learning on integrating sustainable consumption and production measures throughout business operations, relationships and value chains.
Guest Speakers and Panelists:
- Tim Grant, Director, Life Cycle Strategies
- Joshua Bishop, National Manager – Markets, Sustainability and Business Partnerships, WWF Australia
- Craig Chester, Operations Manager Australia, Fairtrade Australia and New Zealand
- Liam Smith, Director, BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash Sustainability Institute
- Clinton Squires, Australian Managing Director, Interface
More information available at: http://www.unaavictoria.org.au/education-advocacy/masterclasses/sustainable-consumption-and-production-seminar/
13. 100% sustainable sourcing of paper products
100% sustainable sourcing of all agricultural raw
materials by 2020
Committed to trading 100% sustainable palm oil
by 2015, in US/EU, and globally by 2020
100% of top 20 wild-caught seafood products are
sourced from sustainable fisheries, or from
fisheries on a pathway to sustainability, by 2015
Corporate commitment to sustainable
sourcing (a few examples)
19. • Soil erosion & degradation
• Loss of natural habitats &
agro-biodiversity
• Over use of fresh water
• Excessive use of agro-
chemicals (fertilizers &
pesticides)
• Discharge and runoff of
polluted effluent and air
pollution
Environmental impacts of sugar production
20. Issues of concern:
• Labourrights of cane cutters and mill employees
• Mechanization of harvesting leading to redundancy of
cane cutters
• Low productivity and income of small-scale farmers
• Land and water conflicts - especially in expansion areas
Countries mainly affected:
Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Honduras, India, Malawi, Pakistan, P
araguay, South Africa
Social issues in sugar
21. Includes:
• Production standard (2011)
• Chain of custody standard (mass balance)
Basic principles:
1. Obey the law
2. Respect human rights and labourstandards
3. Manage input, production and processing efficiencies to
enhance sustainability
4. Actively manage biodiversity and ecosystem services
5. Continuously improve key areas of the business
Bonsucro standards
22. 2/07/2013 - 22
Annual production of 30-35 million tonnes on
over 400,000 ha, worth around AU$2 billion.
95% of sugar produced in Australia is grown
in Queensland and about 5% in northern
New South Wales, along 2,100 km of
coastline.
80% of production is exported, mainly to
South Korea, Indonesia, Malaysia and Japan.
Around 4,000 farming enterprises, most
owned by sole proprietors or family
partnerships, although corporate ownership
of farms is increasing.
Sugarcane in Australia
23. Sugar farming
poses major
risks to Great
Barrier Reef
Source: Great Barrier Outlook Report
2009, Chapter 8, “Risks to the Reef”
(http://www.gbrmpa.gov.au/__data/as
sets/pdf_file/0017/3905/GBRMPA_O
RCH8.pdf)
24. WWF Goal: 20% adoption of best management practice by
producers in the Great Barrier Reef catchments, by 2016.
WWF approach:
Towards sustainable sugar in Australia
• Validate improved practices at farm level
(Project Catalyst)
• Support industry-led Best Management
Practices (BMPs)
• Government funding to develop and promote
improved practices (e.g. Reef Rescue)
• Market recognition for growers and millers
who move towards Bonsucro accreditation
• Research and development
25. • Who bears the cost of sustainable production?
• How to reduce the costs of certification / chain of custody?
• What are the social & environmental impacts of certification?
• How to strengthen the business case for sustainable
production? Especially in developing countries?
• What role can/should governments play?
• How to go beyond the „conscious‟ consumer?
• What potential beyond consumer goods markets?
• How to broaden the scope of certification to embrace
ecosystem services (carbon, water, biodiversity)?
Questions and challenges...
The global LPI continues to show a decline of about 30 per cent (-28%) between 1970 and 2008. This is based on trends in 9,014 populations of 2,688 mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian and fish species – many more than in any previous edition of the Living Planet Report.
The Ecological Footprint, in partnership with GFN, tells us why:Footprint has doubled since 1966. In 2008, the most recent year for which data are available, the footprint exceeded the Earth’s biocapacity – the area of land and productive oceans actually available to produce renewable resources and absorb CO2 emissions – by more than 50 per cent.Our current overshoot is largely due to carbon emissions: and has grown 11-fold since 1961. The largest component of the Ecological Footprint is the carbon footprint (55%). At a national level the carbon footprint represents more than half the Ecological Footprint for one-quarter of the countries tracked. It is the largest component for approximately half the countries tracked
An individual’s Ecological Footprint varies significantly depending on a number of factors, including their country of residence, the quantity of goods and services they consume, the resources used and the wastes generated to provide these goods and services. This comparison includes all countries with populations greater than 1 million for which complete data are available.