Structural Design

Vj NiroSh
Vj NiroShVj NiroSh

Design For Slab,Beam,Foundation and Column

Question:-
A concrete car park structure is shown in the figure you are requested to design the
following elements using BS-8110
 Slab
 Beam denoted by D and E
 A pad footing
 A column
DATA’S:-
1) Finishes of 1 KN/m2
2) Imposed load on slab
Of = [1 +
𝐵
10
] KN/m2
3) Grade of concrete 25 N/mm2
4) Assume self-weight of block
work is 20 KN/m3
5) Bearing pressure of ground
soil 150 KN/m2
6) Cover for slab is 20 mm
7) Cover for beam is 25 mm
8) Cover for footing is 50 mm
WHERE:-
 “A” is a first digit of your
Registration number.
 “B” is a last digit of your
Registration number.
REQUREMENTS:-
 Write your assumption clearly.
 All work are to be under taken individually.
 Submission date is 02/01/2016.
 Late submission will not be accepted.
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:1
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:2
Calculation:-
[My registration number is 41, First digit number (A) = 4,and second digit number (B) = 1]
1) Imposed load on slab = [1 +
𝐵
10
] KN/m2
Solution: - Imposed load on slab (Qk) is = [1 +
1
10
] KN/m2
= [1 + 0.1] KN/m2
= 1.1 KN/m2
2) Car Park Width is = [2.4 +
𝐴
10
] m
Solution: - Car Park Width is = [2.4 +
4
10
] m
= [2.4 + 0.4] m
= 2.8 m
[This design calculation Assume the finishes load only consider the slab]
 Symbols:-
𝑓𝑦 – Characteristic strength of reinforcement
𝑓𝑦𝑣 – Characteristic strength of links
𝑓𝑐𝑢 – Characteristic strength of concrete
𝛾 𝑚 – Partial safety factor for strength of materials
𝑑 – Effective depth of the tension reinforcement
𝐴 𝑆 – Area of the tension reinforcement
𝐴 𝑆𝑉 – Total cross-section of links at the neutral axis
𝑏 – Width or Effective width of the section
𝐴 𝑆𝐶 – Area of vertical reinforcement
𝐺 𝑘 – Characteristic dead load
𝑄 𝑘 – Characteristic Imposed load
𝑙 𝑥 – Length of shorter side
𝑙 𝑦 – Length of longer side
𝑙 – Span of the beam
𝐻 – High yields steel
𝑀 – Design ultimate moment
𝑉 – Design shear force due to ultimate loads
 𝑐 – Design concrete shear stress
 – Design shear stress at a cross-section
𝑁 – Design axial force
𝑆 𝑉 – Spacing of links along the member
𝑐 – Column width
𝑙 𝐶 – Half the spacing between column centers
𝐴 𝐶 – Area of the concrete section
𝑓𝑆 – Estimated design service stress in the
tension reinforcement
𝑙 𝑂 – Clear height between end restraints
ℎ – Overall depth of the cross-section of a R/F
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:3
REINFORCEMENT
SLAB
BS 8110 : 1997
PART – 1, SECTION 3 , CLAUSE 3.5[Solid slabs supported by
beams or walls]
h
d
c
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:4
 Design of a reinforced roof slab ( BS 8110 )
A reinforced concrete roof subject to an imposed load of 1.1 KNm−2 spans between
walls as shown below. Design the roof for 𝑓𝑐𝑢= 25 Nmm-2 and cover for slab is 20mm.
[Assuming the following material strength 𝑓𝑦 = 460 Nmm-2 and Diameter of main steel
(Φ) = 10 mm and Assume this slab is simply supported but normal condition is fixed
support]
a) ANALYSIS
The car park area is 2800 mm x 6000 mm, so 𝑙 𝑥 = 2800 mm and 𝑙 𝑦 = 6000 mm
𝑙 𝑦
𝑙 𝑥
=
6000
2800
= 2.143 > 2, Hence this slab is one-way spanning slab.
b) DEPTH OF SLAB
[Assume the modification factor is 1.5]
Minimum effective depth, dmin =
𝑆𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑐 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 ×𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟
=
2800
20 ×1.5
= 93.333 mm
Hence, assume effective depth of slab (d) = 95 mm.
Overall depth of slab (h) = d + /2 + c
= 95 + 10/2 + 20
= 120 mm
c) LOADING
 Dead
Self-weight of slab = 0.120m × 24 kNm−3 = 2.880 KNm−2
Finishes = 1 KNm-2
Total Dead load (Gk) = 2.880 + 1 = 3.880 KNm-2
225 mm
2800 mm

(Basic ratio from table
3.9,BS-8110)
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:5  Imposed
Total imposed load (Qk) = 1.1 KNm−2
 Ultimate design load
(For 1 m width of slab total ultimate load), W, is
W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk) x width of slab × span
= (1.4 × 3.880 + 1.6 × 1.1) x 1 × 2.80
= 20.138 KN
d) MOMENT
 Design moment (M) =
𝑊 ×𝐿
8
=
20.138 𝐾𝑁 ×2.80 𝑚
8
= 7.048 KNm
 Ultimate design moment (Mu) = 0.156 𝑓𝑐𝑢bd2
= 0.156 x 25 Nmm-2 x 1 m x 952 mm2
= 35.197 KNm
Since M < Mu, no compression reinforcement is required.
e) MAIN STEEL
 K =
𝑀
𝑓 𝑐𝑢 b𝑑2 =
7.048 × 106
25 ×1000 ×952 = 0.031
 Z = 𝑑 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 𝐾
0.9⁄ ]
= 95 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 0.031
0.9⁄ ]
= 95 [ 0.964 ] mm = 91.607 mm > 0.95𝑑 (= 90.25 mm)
Hence Z = 0.95𝑑 (= 90.25 mm)
 As =
𝑀
0.95 × 𝑓𝑦 ×𝑍
=
7.048 × 106
0.95 ×460 ×90.25
= 178.705 mm2/m
 Asmin = 0.13% Ac = 0.0013 x 1000 x 120 = 156 mm2/m < As
Width of slab
(Asmin from table 3.25,BS-8110)
For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given
diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 10 mm diameter bars spaced at
300 mm
 H10 @ 300 mm centers (As = 262mm2/m).
f) ACTUAL MODIFICATION FACTOR
 Design services stress, 𝑓𝑠 =
2
3
× 𝑓𝑦 ×
𝐴𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑞
𝐴𝑠 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣
=
2
3
× 460 ×
178.705
262.00
= 209.171 Nmm-2
 Modification factor = 0.55 +
(477 − 𝑓𝑠)
120 × [0.9 +
𝑀
𝑏𝑑2]
= 0.55 +
(477−209.171)
120 × [0.9+
7.048 ×106
1000 ×952 ]
= 0.55 +
267.829
120 × [0.9+ 0.781]
= 0.55 + 1.328
= 1.878 < 2 , This factor satisfy for this case.
 Hence, New dmin =
𝑆𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑐 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 ×𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟
=
2800
20 ×1.878
= 74.547 mm < assume d = 95 mm
Therefore take d = 95 mm and provide H10 @ 300 mm Centers as main steel.
g) SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT
This is one way-spanning slab, hence secondary reinforcement Based on minimum steel
area = 156 mm2/m. Assume secondary reinforcement diameter () 8 mm.
Hence from using steel area tables, provide H8 @ 300 mm Centre’s (As = 168 mm2/m).
(Note that the condition 𝛽 𝑏 ≤ 1does not apply hear)
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:6
d=95 mm
h) DEFLECTION
 Actual
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
=
2800
95
= 29.474
 Permissible
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
= Basic ratio x modification factor
= 20 x 1.878
= 37.560
Hence Actual
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
< Permissible
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
Hence defection check is satisfy.
i) SHEAR REINFORCEMENT
Since slab is symmetrically loaded
RA = RB =
𝑊
2
=
20.138
2
= 10.069 KN
 Ultimate shear force (V ) = 10.069 KN
And design shear stress, is
 =
𝑉
𝑏 𝑣 𝑑
=
10.069 × 103
1000 × 95
= 0.106 Nmm-2
 Design concrete shear stress, c
c = 0.79 {
100 𝐴𝑠
𝑏 𝑣 𝑑
}
1
3⁄
(
400
𝑑
)
1
4⁄
𝛾 𝑚
c = 0.79 {
100 ×262
1000 × 95
}
1
3⁄
(
400
95
)
1
4⁄
1.25
c =
0.79 ×0.6509 ×1.4325
1.25
= 0.7366 Nmm-2
From Table 3.16 for BS-8110, since  < c, no shear reinforcement is required.
Main steel
Secondary steel
RBRA 2800 mm
W
V
V
(c from table 3.8,BS-8110)
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:7
j) REINFORCEMENT DETAILS
k) CHECK SPACING BETWEEN BARS
Maximum spacing between bars should not exceed the lesser of 3d (= 285 mm) or
750 mm. Actual spacing = 300 mm main steel and 300 mm secondary steel. OK.
l) MAXIMUM CRACK WITH
Since the slab depth does not exceed 200 mm, the above spacing between bars will
automatically ensure that the maximum permissible crack width of 0.3 mm will not be
exceeded.
(from clause 3.12.11.2.7,BS-
88110)
(from clause 3.12.11.2.1,BS-
88110)
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:8
REINFORCEMENT
BEAM
BS 8110 : 1997
PART – 1 , SECTION 3 , CLAUSE 3.4 [ Beams ]
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:9
 Design of a reinforced beam ( BS 8110 )
A reinforced concrete roof slab to an imposed load of 1.1 KNm−2, self-weight of block
work is 20 KN/m3. Design the beam for 𝑓𝑐𝑢= 25 Nmm-2 and cover for beam is 25 mm.
[Assuming the following material strength 𝑓𝑦 = 460 Nmm-2 and 𝑓𝑦𝑣= 250 Nmm-2]
Figure of the one-way spanning slab load distribution as shown above. It is supported
by beams in only 2 sides, so beam-D is load distribution beam and beam-E is non load
distribution beam
Design of a beam - D
D – Beam as shown below:
a) LOADING
 Dead
Self-weight of slab = 0.120 m x 1.2875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 3.7080 KNm−1
Self-weight of beam = 0.225 m x 0.500 m x 24 KNm−3 = 2.70 KNm−1
Finishes of slab = 1.2875 m x 1 KNm-2 = 1.2875 KNm−1
Block wall load = 0.125 m x 1.00 m x 20 KNm−3 = 2.50 KNm−1
Total Dead load (Gk) = 3.708 + 2.70 + 1.2875 + 2.50 = 10.1955 KNm-1
 Imposed
Total imposed load (Qk) = 1.2875 m x 1.1 KNm−2 = 1.4163 KNm-1
 Ultimate design load
Total ultimate load, W is
W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk) × span
= (1.4 × 10.1955 + 1.6 × 1.4163) × 6.0 m
= 99.2387 KN
Beam - D
Beam- E
225 mm
6000 mm
h=500 mm
b=225 mm
SECTION OF BEAM
Load distribution
Direction
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:10
b) MOMENT
 Design moment (M) =
𝑊 ×𝐿
8
=
99.2387 × 6.0
8
= 74.4290 KNm
c) EFFECTIVE DEPTH
 Assume diameter of main bars (Φ) = 20 mm
 Assume diameter of links (Φ′) = 8 mm
 Cover for beam Δc = 25 mm.
d = h − c − Φ′ − Φ/2
= 500 − 25 − 8 − 20/2 = 457 mm
d) ULTIMATE MOMENT OF RESISTENT
 Ultimate design moment (Mu) = 0.156𝑓𝑐𝑢 bd2
= 0.156 x 25 Nmm-2 x 0.225 m x 4572 mm2
= 183.265 KNm
Since M < Mu, no compression reinforcement is required.
e) MAIN STEEL
 K =
𝑀
𝑓 𝑐𝑢 b𝑑2 =
74.4290 × 106
25 × 225 × 4572 = 0.0634
 Z = 𝑑 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 𝐾
0.9⁄ ]
= 457 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 0.0634
0.9⁄ ]
= 457 [ 1.0661 ] mm = 487.1977 mm > 0.95𝑑 (= 434.150 mm)
Hence Z = 420.2828 mm
 As =
𝑀
0.95 × 𝑓𝑦 ×𝑍
=
74.4290 × 106
0.95 ×460 ×420.2828
= 405.2464 mm2
 Asmin = 0.13% Ac = 0.0013 x 225 x 500 = 146.250 mm2 < As
For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given
diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 20 mm diameter 2 bars .
 2H20 (As = 628 mm2)
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:11
Effective span (clause 3.4.1.2, BS 8110)
The above calculations were based on an effective span of
6 m, but this needs to be confirmed. For a simply
supported beam this should be taken as the lesser of
(1) The distance between centers of bearings, A, or
(2) The clear distance between supports, D, plus the effective depth, d, of the beam
 Clear distance between supports = 6000 mm – 225 mm = 5775 mm
 Clear distance + effective depth = 5775 mm + 457 mm = 6232 mm
Assumed span length of 6 m is correct.
f) DEFLECTION
 Actual
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
=
6000
457
= 13.129
 Design services stress, 𝑓𝑠 =
2
3
× 𝑓𝑦 ×
𝐴𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑞
𝐴𝑠 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣
=
2
3
× ×
405.2464
628.00
= 197.8910 Nmm-2
 Modification factor = 0.55 +
(477 − 𝑓𝑠)
120 × [0.9 +
𝑀
𝑏𝑑2]
= 0.55 +
(477−197.8910)
120 × [0.9+
74.4290 ×106
225 × 4572 ]
= 0.55 +
279.1090
120 × [0.9+ 1.5839]
= 0.55 + 0.9364
= 1.4864 < 2 , This factor satisfy for this case.
 Permissible
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
= Basic ratio x modification factor
= 20 x 1.4864
= 29.7279
Hence Actual
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
< Permissible
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
The beam therefore satisfies the deflection criteria in BS 8110.
460
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:12
g) SHEAR REINFORCEMENT
Ultimate design load W = 104.093 KN
Since beam is symmetrically loaded
RA = RB =
𝑊
2
=
99.2387
2
= 49.6194 KN
 Ultimate shear force (V ) = 49.6194 KN
And shear stress, is
 =
𝑉
𝑏 𝑣 𝑑
=
49.6194 × 103
225 × 457
= 0.4826 Nmm-2 < Permissible = 0.8√𝑓𝑐𝑢
h) SPACING OF LINKS
All through the shear force will be maximum at the face of the support. The design shear
force for uniformly distributed load is at the section “d” from the face
 Calculate the design shear force
𝑉 𝑑
3000−𝑑
=
𝑉
3000
𝑉 𝑑
3000−457
=
49.6194
3000
Vdesign = 42.0607 KN
 Calculate the design shear stress, d is
d =
𝑉 𝑑
𝑏 𝑣 𝑑
=
42.0607 × 103
225 × 457
= 0.4091 Nmm-2
 Design concrete shear stress, c
c = {
100 𝐴𝑠
𝑏 𝑣 𝑑
}
1
3⁄
(
400
𝑑
)
1
4⁄
𝛾 𝑚
c = {
100 ×628
225× 457
}
1
3⁄
(
400
457
)
1
4⁄
1.25
c =
0.79 × 0.8484 ×0.9672
1.25
= 0.5186 Nmm-2
RBRA 6000 mm
W
V
V
[= 0.8√25 = 4 Nmm-2
]
VVdd
V Vdesing
3000 mm
0.79
0.79
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:13
 0.5c = 0.5 x 0.5186 = 0.2593 Nmm-2
 c + 0.4 = 0.5186 + 0.4 = 0.9186 Nmm-2
Hence, 0.5 𝑐 <  𝑑 < (  𝑐 + 0.4 )
Design links required according to
𝐴 𝑠𝑣 ≥
0.4 𝑏 𝑣 𝑆 𝑣
0.95 𝑓𝑦𝑣
[Diameter of link 8 mm and 𝑓𝑦𝑣 = 250 Nmm-2]
 𝐴 𝑠𝑣 = 2 ×
𝜋
4
× 𝑑2
= 2 ×
𝜋
4
× 82
= 100.531 mm2
Hence 100.531 ≥ 0.4 × 225 × 𝑆 𝑣
0.95 ×250
𝑆 𝑣 ≤ 100.531 ×0.95 ×250
0.4 ×225
𝑆 𝑣 ≤ 265.29 mm
Maximum spacing of links is 0.75d = 0.75 × 457 = 342.75 mm. Hence provide H8
links at 200 mm centers.
i) REINFORMATION DETAILS
The sketch below shows the main reinforcement requirements for the beam “D”
(from Table 3.7 ,BS-88110)
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:14
Design of a beam - E
E – Beam as shown below:
Self-weight of block work is 20 KN/m3.
Design the beam for 𝑓𝑐𝑢= 25 Nmm-2 and
cover for beam is 25 mm. [Assuming the
following material strength 𝑓𝑦 = 250
Nmm-2 ]
a) LOADING
 Dead
Self-weight of beam = 0.225 m x 0.300 m x 24 KNm−3 = 1.62 KNm−1
Block wall load = 0.125 m x 1.00 m x 20 KNm−3 = 2.50 KNm−1
Total Dead load (Gk) = 1.62 + 2.50 = 4.120 KNm-1
 Imposed
Total imposed load (Qk) = 0.00
 Ultimate design load
Total ultimate load, W is
W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk) × span
= (1.4 × 4.120 + 1.6 × 0.00) × 2.8 m
= 16.15 KN
b) MOMENT
 Design moment (M) =
𝑊 ×𝐿
8
=
16.15 ×2.8
8
= 5.653 KNm
c) EFFECTIVE DEPTH
 Assume diameter of main bars (Φ) = 10 mm
 Assume diameter of links (Φ′) = 6 mm
225 mm
2800 mm
h=300 mm
b=225 mm
SECTION OF BEAM
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:15
 Cover for beam Δc = 25 mm.
d = h − c − Φ′ − Φ/2
= 300 − 25 − 6 − 10/2 = 264 mm
d) ULTIMATE MOMENT OF RESISTENT
 Ultimate design moment (Mu) = 0.156𝑓𝑐𝑢 bd2
= 0.156 x 25 Nmm-2 x 0.225 m x 2642 mm2
= 61.158 KNm
Since M < Mu, no compression reinforcement is required.
e) MAIN STEEL
 K =
𝑀
𝑓 𝑐𝑢 b𝑑2 =
5.653 × 106
25 ×225 ×2642 = 0.014419
 Z = 𝑑 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 𝐾
0.9⁄ ]
= 264 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 0.014419
0.9⁄ ]
= 264 [ 0.9837 ] mm = 259.6968 mm > 0.95𝑑 (= 250.80 mm)
Hence Z = 0.95𝑑 (= 250.80 mm)
 As =
𝑀
0.95 × 𝑓𝑦 ×𝑍
=
5.633 × 106
0.95 ×250 ×250.80
= 138.216 mm2
 Asmin = 0.24% Ac = 0.0024 x 225 x 300 = 162.00 mm2 > As
For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given
diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 10 mm diameter 3 bars .
 3H10 (As = 236 mm2)
Effective span (clause 3.4.1.2, BS 8110)
The above calculations were based on an effective span of 2.8 m, but this needs to be
confirmed. For a simply supported beam this should be taken as the lesser of
(Asmin from table 3.25,BS-8110)
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:16
 Clear distance between supports = 2800 mm – 225 mm = 2575 mm
 Clear distance + effective depth = 2575 mm + 264 mm = 2839 mm
Assumed span length of 2.8 m is correct.
f) DEFLECTION
 Actual
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
=
2800
264
= 10.6061
 Design services stress, 𝑓𝑠 =
2
3
× 𝑓𝑦 ×
𝐴𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑞
𝐴𝑠 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣
=
2
3
× ×
138.216
236.00
= 97.6102 Nmm-2
 Modification factor = 0.55 +
(477 − 𝑓𝑠)
120 × [0.9 +
𝑀
𝑏𝑑2]
= 0.55 +
(477−97.6102)
120 × [0.9+
5.653 ×106
225 × 2642]
= 0.55 +
379.3898
120 × [0.9+ 0.3605]
= 0.55 + 2.5082
= 3.0582 > 2 , This factor not satisfy for this case.
Hence,
This beam cross-section (225 mm x 300 mm) is not satisfy for this load distribution
So we can change the dimension, assume this cross-section and again design the
beam-E
 Cross-section = 225 mm x 180 mm
g) LOADING
 Dead
Self-weight of beam = 0.225 m x 0.180 m x 24 KNm−3 = 0.972 KNm−1
Block wall load = 0.125 m x 1.00 m x 20 KNm−3 = 2.50 KNm−1
Total Dead load (Gk) = 0.972 + 2.50 = 3.472 KNm-1
 Imposed
Total imposed load (Qk) = 0.00
250
h=180 mm
b=225 mm
SECTION OF BEAM
(Table 3.10 for BS-8110)
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:17
 Ultimate design load
Total ultimate load, W is
W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk) × span
= (1.4 × 3.472 + 1.6 × 0.00) × 2.8 m
= 13.610 KN
h) MOMENT
 Design moment (M) =
𝑊 ×𝐿
8
=
13.610 × 2.8
8
= 4.7646 KNm
i) EFFECTIVE DEPTH
 Assume diameter of main bars (Φ) = 10 mm
 Assume diameter of links (Φ′) = 6 mm
 Cover for beam Δc = 25 mm.
d = h − c − Φ′ − Φ/2
= 180 − 25 − 6 − 10/2 = 144 mm
j) ULTIMATE MOMENT OF RESISTENT
 Ultimate design moment (Mu) = 0.156𝑓𝑐𝑢 bd2
= 0.156 x 25 Nmm-2 x 0.225 m x 1442 mm2
= 18.1958 KNm
Since M < Mu, no compression reinforcement is required.
k) MAIN STEEL
 K =
𝑀
𝑓 𝑐𝑢 b𝑑2 =
4.7646 × 106
25 ×225 ×1442 = 0.040849
 Z = 𝑑 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 𝐾
0.9⁄ ]
= 144 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 0.040849
0.9⁄ ]
= 144 [ 0.9523 ] mm = 137.1371 mm > 0.95𝑑 (= 136.80 mm)
Hence Z = 0.95𝑑 (= 136.80 mm)
 As =
𝑀
0.95 × 𝑓𝑦 ×𝑍
=
4.7646 × 106
0.95 ×250 ×136.80
= 146.6482 mm2
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:18
 Asmin = 0.24% Ac = 0.0024 x 225 x 180 = 97.20 mm2 < As
For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given
diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 10 mm diameter 2 bars .
 2H10 (As = 157.00 mm2)
l) DEFLECTION
 Actual
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
=
2800
144
= 19.4444
 Design services stress, 𝑓𝑠 =
2
3
× 𝑓𝑦 ×
𝐴𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑞
𝐴𝑠 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣
=
2
3
× ×
146.6482
157
= 155.6775 Nmm-2
 Modification factor = 0.55 +
(477 − 𝑓𝑠)
120 × [0.9 +
𝑀
𝑏𝑑2]
= 0.55 +
(477−155.6775)
120 × [0.9+
4.7646 ×106
225 × 1442 ]
= 0.55 +
321.3225
120 × [0.9+ 1.0212]
= 0.55 + 1.3937
= 1.9437 < 2 , This factor satisfy for this case.
 Permissible
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
= Basic ratio x modification factor
= 20 x 1.9437
= 38.8749
Hence Actual
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
< Permissible
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
The beam therefore satisfies the deflection criteria in BS 8110.
j) SHEAR REINFORCEMENT
Ultimate design load W = 12.9752 KN
Since beam is symmetrically loaded
RA = RB =
𝑊
2
=
13.610
2
= 6.8050 KN
250
RBRA 2800 mm
W
V
V
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:19
 Ultimate shear force (V ) = 6.8050 KN
And shear stress, is
 =
𝑉
𝑏 𝑣 𝑑
=
6.8050 × 103
225 × 144
= 0.2100 Nmm-2 < Permissible = 0.8√𝑓𝑐𝑢
k) SPACING OF LINKS
All through the shear force will be maximum at the face of the support. The design shear
force for uniformly distributed load is at the section “d” from the face
 Calculate the design shear force
𝑉 𝑑
1400−𝑑
=
𝑉
1400
𝑉 𝑑
1400−144
=
6.8050
1400
Vdesign = 6.1051 KN
 Calculate the design shear stress, d is
d =
𝑉 𝑑
𝑏 𝑣 𝑑
=
6.1051 × 103
225 × 144
= 0.1884 Nmm-2
 Design concrete shear stress, c
c = {
100 𝐴𝑠
𝑏 𝑣 𝑑
}
1
3⁄
(
400
𝑑
)
1
4⁄
𝛾 𝑚
c = {
100 ×157
225× 144
}
1
3⁄
(
400
144
)
1
4⁄
1.25
c =
0.79 × 0.7854 ×1.2910
1.25
= 0.6408 Nmm-2
 0.5c = 0.5 x 0.6408 = 0.3204Nmm-2
design < 0.5c , shear reinforcement may not be necessary.
l) REINFORMATION DETAILS
The sketch below shows the main reinforcement requirements for the beam “E”
[= 0.8√25 = 4 Nmm-2
]
V
Vdd
V Vd
1400 mm
0.79
0.79
C–25mm
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:20
REINFORCEMENT
BASES
BS 8110 : 1997
PART – 1 , SECTION 3 , CLAUSE 3.11 [ Bases ]
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:21
 Design of a reinforced foundation ( BS 8110 )
A 225 mm square column carries a load transmit to foundation, safe bearing capacity
of the soil is 150 KNm-2. Design a square pad footing to resist the load.𝑓𝑐𝑢= 25 Nmm-2
[Assuming the following material strength 𝑓𝑦 = 250 Nmm-2]
a) LOADING
 Dead
Self-weight of slab = 0.120 m x 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 10.7069 KN
Self-weight of beam-E = 0.225 m x 0.180 x 1.2875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 1.2515 KN
Self-weight of beam-D = 0.225 m x 0.500 m x 2.8875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 7.796 KN
Self-weight of column = 0.225 m x 0.225 m x 3.5 m x 24 KNm−3 = 4.2525 KN
Finishes of slab = 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 1 KNm-2 = 3.7177 KN
Block wall load = 0.125 m x 1.00 m x 4.50 m x 20 KNm−3 = 11.250 KN
Total Dead load (Gk) = 10.7069 + 1.2515 + 7.796 + 4.2525 + 3.7177 + 11.250
= 38.9746 KN
 Imposed
Total imposed load (Qk) = 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 1.1 kNm−2 = 4.0894 KN
 Ultimate design load
Total ultimate load, W is
W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk)
= (1.4 × 38.9746 + 1.6 × 4.0894)
= 61.1075 KN
 Serviceability load
Design axial load =
𝑈𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑
1.45
= 61.1075
1.45
= 42.1431 KN.
Beam - D
Beam- E
Design
Area
3.0 m
1.4 m
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:22
 Total weight
Total weight including footing weight = Serviceability load + 8% of Axial load
= 42.1431 +
8 ×42.1431
100
= 45.5145 KN.
b) PLAN AREA
Plan area of base =
𝑁
𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑖𝑙
=
45.5145
150
= 0.3034 m2 = 303430.00 mm2
Hence provide a 600 mm square base (plan area 0.36 m2)
c) SELF-WEIGHT OF FOOTING
[Assume the overall depth of footing (h) = 150 mm]
 Self-weight of footing = Area x h x density of concrete
= 0.36 x 0.15 x 24 KNm-3
= 1.296 KN
 Actual total load = 42.1431 + 1.296 = 43.4391 KN
 Actual earth pressure (Ps) =
𝑊
𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑛 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒
=
43.4391
0.36
= 120.6642 KNm-2
Ps < Bearing capacity of soil
d) DESIGN MOMENT
 Total ultimate load (W) = 1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk
= 61.1075 KN
 Earth pressure (Pe) =
Ultimate load
Area
=
61.1075
0.36
= 169.7431 KNm-2
0.1875 m 0.1875 m
0.225 m
168.9317 KNm-2
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:23
davg
cover
Φ
 Maximum design moment (M) = Resultant force x length
(Occurs at face of column) = ( 169.7431 x 0.6 x 0.1875 ) x
0.1875
2
= 19.0961 x 0.0938
= 1.7912 KNm
e) ULTIMATE MOMENT
Base to be cast against blinding, hence cover (c) to reinforcement = 50 mm (Assume
10 mm diameter (Φ) bars will be needed as bending reinforcement in both directions.
Hence, average effective depth of reinforcement, davg is
 davg = h – cover – Φ
= 150 – 50 – 10
= 90 mm
 Ultimate design moment (Mu) = 0.156𝑓𝑐𝑢 bd2
= 0.156 x 25 Nmm-2 x 0.6 m x 902 mm2
= 18.9540 KNm
Since M < Mu, no compression reinforcement is required.
f) MAIN STEEL
 K =
𝑀
𝑓 𝑐𝑢 b𝑑2 =
1.7912 × 106
25 ×600 × 902 = 0.0147
 Z = 𝑑 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 𝐾
0.9⁄ ]
= 90 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 0.0147
0.9⁄ ]
= 90 [ 0.9834 ] mm = 88.5052 mm > 0.95𝑑 (= 85.50 mm)
Hence Z = 0.95𝑑 (= 85.50 mm)
 As =
𝑀
0.95 × 𝑓𝑦 ×𝑍
=
1.7912 × 106
0.95 ×250 × 85.5
= 88.2093 mm2
 Asmin = 0.24% Ac = 0.0024 x 600 x 150 = 216.00 mm2 > As
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:24
For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given
diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 10 mm diameter 3 bars.
 3H10 (As = 236 mm2)
g) DISTRIBUTION OF REINFORCEMENT (See clause 3.11.3.2, BS 8110)
 𝑙 𝑐 = 600/2 = 300 mm

3𝑐
4
+
9𝑑
4
=
3 × 225
4
+
9 ×90
4
= 371.25 mm
 𝑙 𝑐 <
3𝑐
4
+
9𝑑
4
Hence, provide 3H10 (As = 236 mm2) distributed uniformly across the full width of the
footing parallel to the x–x and y–y axis.
h) PUNCH SHEAR
 Critical perimeter, pcrit, is
[ pcrit = column perimeter + 8 × 1.5d ] OR [ pcrit = 4 ( 225 + 3d ) ]
pcrit = ( 4 x 225 ) + ( 8 x 1.5 x 90 )
= 1980 mm
 Area within perimeter is = ( 225 + 3d )2
= ( 225 + 3 x 90 )2
= 0.2450 x 106 mm2
 Ultimate punching force, V, is
V = load on shaded area
= 169.7431 × ( 0.36 – 0.245) = 19.5205 KN
 Design punching shear stress,  , is
 =
𝑉
𝑃 𝑐𝑟𝑖 ×𝑑
=
19.5205 ×103
1980 ×90
= 0.1095 Nmm-2 < Permissible = 0.8√𝑓𝑐𝑢
 Design concrete shear stress, c
c = {
100 𝐴𝑠
𝑏 𝑣 𝑑
}
1
3⁄
(
400
𝑑
)
1
4⁄
𝛾 𝑚
1.5d
225 + 3d
0.79
[= 0.8√25 = 4 Nmm-2
]
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:25
c = {
100 ×88.2093
600 × 90
}
1
3⁄
(
400
90
)
1
4⁄
1.25
c =
0.79 × 0.5466 ×1.4520
1.25
= 0.5016 Nmm-2
Since c >  , punching failure is unlikely and a 150 mm depth of slab is acceptable.
i) REINFORMATION DETAILS
The sketch below shows the main reinforcement requirements for the foundation
0.79
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:26
REINFORCEMENT
COLUMN
BS 8110 : 1997
PART – 1 , SECTION 3 , CLAUSE 3.8 [ Columns ]
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:27
 Design of a reinforced column ( BS 8110 )
A column may be considered to be unbraced if the lateral loads are resisted by the
sway action of the column [Assume this is unbraced column]
a) CLASSIFICATION OF A CONCRETE COLUMN
 For bending in the “Y” direction:
End condition at top of column = 2
End condition at bottom of column = 2
Hence from Table 3.20,BS-8110, βx = 1.5
𝑙 𝑒𝑦
ℎ
=
𝛽 𝑦 𝑙 𝑜
ℎ
=
1.5 × 3320
225
= 22.1333 > 10
 For bending in the “X” direction:
End condition at top of column = 1
End condition at bottom of column = 2
Hence from Table 3.20,BS-8110, βy = 1.3
𝑙 𝑒𝑥
𝑏
=
𝛽𝑥 𝑙 𝑜
𝑏
=
1.3 × 3000
225
= 17.3333 > 10
Since both
𝑙 𝑒𝑥
ℎ
and
𝑙 𝑒𝑦
𝑏
are both greater than 10, the column is SLENDER.
180
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:28
Design the longitudinal steel and links for a 225 mm square, slender-Unbraced column
which supports the following axial loads: 𝑓𝑐𝑢= 25 Nmm-2 [Assuming the following
material strength 𝑓𝑦 = 460 Nmm-2 and 𝑓𝑦𝑣= 250 Nmm-2 and Diameter of main steel (Φ)
= 12 mm, diameter of links (Φ′) = 6 mm]
b) LOADING
 Dead
Self-weight of slab = 0.120 m x 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 10.7069 KN
Self-weight of beam-E = 0.225 m x 0.180 x 1.2875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 1.2515 KN
Self-weight of beam-D = 0.225 m x 0.500 m x 2.8875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 7.796 KN
Self-weight of column = 0.225 m x 0.225 m x 3.5 m x 24 KNm−3 = 4.2525 KN
Finishes of slab = 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 1 KNm-2 = 3.7177 KN
Block wall load = 0.125 m x 1.00 m x 4.50 m x 20 KNm−3 = 11.250 KN
Total Dead load (Gk) = 10.7069 + 1.2515 + 7.796 + 4.2525 + 3.7177 + 11.250
= 38.9746 KN
 Imposed
Total imposed load (Qk) = 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 1.1 kNm−2 = 4.0894 KN
 Ultimate design load
Total ultimate load, W is
W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk)
= (1.4 × 38.9746 + 1.6 × 4.0894)
= 61.1075 KN
c) LONGITUDINAL STEEL
Since column is axially loaded, use equation 28, BS-8110.
N = 0.4 𝑓𝑐𝑢 𝐴 𝑐𝑜𝑛 + 0.8 𝑓𝑦 𝐴 𝑠𝑐
61.1075 x 103 = 0.4 x 25 x (2252 - Asc) + 0.8 x 460 x Asc
61107.5 = 506250.0 – 10 Asc + 368 Asc
358 Asc = - 445142.50
Hence, no require for reinforcement steels for this column.
Asc Minimum = 0.13%Ac = 0.0013 x 225 x 255 = 65.8125 mm2
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:29
For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given
diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 12 mm diameter 1 bar.
e) SIZE AND MINIMUM NUMBER OF BARS
From clause 3.12.5.3, BS 8110 . Columns with rectangular cross-sections should be
reinforced with a minimum of four longitudinal bars and each of the bars should not be
less than 12 mm in diameter.
 Hence, provide 12 mm diameter 4 bars.
 4H12 (As = 452 mm2)
f) LINKS - (clause 3.12.7, BS 8110)
 Size of links. Links should be at one-quarter of the size of the largest
longitudinal bar or 6 mm, whichever is the greater. That is
=
1
4
× 12 = 3 mm , but not less than 6mm diameter.
 The spacing of the links, is the lesser of
(a) 12 times the diameter of the smallest longitudinal bar, that is,
12 × 12 = 144 mm, or
(b) The smallest cross-sectional dimension of the column (= 225 mm).
 Provide H6 links at 125 mm centers.
g) REINFORMATION DETAILS
The sketch below shows the main reinforcement requirements for the column
PLAN
SECTION
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:30
CARPARK
ISOMATRIC
VIEW
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:31
[Assumefoundation
Depthfromground
Level=600mm]
255
0
THANK YOU
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:32

Recommandé

Design project par
Design projectDesign project
Design projectKabilan Kabi
46.8K vues38 diapositives
Design of RCC Column footing par
Design of RCC Column footingDesign of RCC Column footing
Design of RCC Column footingArun Kurali
62K vues39 diapositives
Analysis of g+3 rcc storied building par
Analysis of g+3 rcc storied buildingAnalysis of g+3 rcc storied building
Analysis of g+3 rcc storied buildingTarun kumar
9.2K vues33 diapositives
Design of footing as per IS 456-2000 par
Design of footing as per IS 456-2000Design of footing as per IS 456-2000
Design of footing as per IS 456-2000PraveenKumar Shanmugam
33.5K vues28 diapositives
Project par
ProjectProject
Projecttp jayamohan
16.7K vues78 diapositives
Roof truss design par
Roof truss designRoof truss design
Roof truss designFOYSOLMAHMUD1
2.5K vues18 diapositives

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Slope and Deflection Method ,The Moment Distribution Method ,Strain Energy Me... par
Slope and Deflection Method ,The Moment Distribution Method ,Strain Energy Me...Slope and Deflection Method ,The Moment Distribution Method ,Strain Energy Me...
Slope and Deflection Method ,The Moment Distribution Method ,Strain Energy Me...Aayushi5
610 vues90 diapositives
Design of torsion reinforcement par
 Design of torsion reinforcement Design of torsion reinforcement
Design of torsion reinforcementMuskanDeura
1.5K vues28 diapositives
Compression member par
Compression memberCompression member
Compression memberkamariya keyur
12.7K vues42 diapositives
Classification of cross section par
Classification of cross sectionClassification of cross section
Classification of cross sectionValmik Mahajan
442 vues7 diapositives
Structural Analysis Seasonal Exam par
Structural Analysis Seasonal ExamStructural Analysis Seasonal Exam
Structural Analysis Seasonal ExamBahzad5
634 vues144 diapositives
Design of two-way slab par
Design of two-way slabDesign of two-way slab
Design of two-way slabcivilengineeringfreedownload
9.6K vues14 diapositives

Tendances(20)

Slope and Deflection Method ,The Moment Distribution Method ,Strain Energy Me... par Aayushi5
Slope and Deflection Method ,The Moment Distribution Method ,Strain Energy Me...Slope and Deflection Method ,The Moment Distribution Method ,Strain Energy Me...
Slope and Deflection Method ,The Moment Distribution Method ,Strain Energy Me...
Aayushi5610 vues
Design of torsion reinforcement par MuskanDeura
 Design of torsion reinforcement Design of torsion reinforcement
Design of torsion reinforcement
MuskanDeura1.5K vues
Structural Analysis Seasonal Exam par Bahzad5
Structural Analysis Seasonal ExamStructural Analysis Seasonal Exam
Structural Analysis Seasonal Exam
Bahzad5634 vues
Design calculations of raft foundation par Shahzad Ali
Design calculations of raft foundationDesign calculations of raft foundation
Design calculations of raft foundation
Shahzad Ali1.9K vues
Rectangular beam design by WSD method (singly & doubly reinforcement) par Md. Shahadat Hossain
Rectangular beam design by WSD method (singly & doubly reinforcement)Rectangular beam design by WSD method (singly & doubly reinforcement)
Rectangular beam design by WSD method (singly & doubly reinforcement)
Design and analasys of a g+3 residential building using staad par gopichand's
Design and analasys of a g+3 residential building using staadDesign and analasys of a g+3 residential building using staad
Design and analasys of a g+3 residential building using staad
gopichand's171.3K vues
Isolated footing design par srinu_anduri
Isolated footing designIsolated footing design
Isolated footing design
srinu_anduri1.3K vues

Similaire à Structural Design

onw way slab design par
onw way slab designonw way slab design
onw way slab designPalak Patel
375 vues49 diapositives
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptx par
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptxAnalysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptxDP NITHIN
182 vues42 diapositives
IRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute Building par
IRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute BuildingIRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute Building
IRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute BuildingIRJET Journal
41 vues9 diapositives
Design of Steel Grillage Foundation for an Auditorium par
Design of Steel Grillage Foundation for an AuditoriumDesign of Steel Grillage Foundation for an Auditorium
Design of Steel Grillage Foundation for an AuditoriumIRJET Journal
221 vues9 diapositives
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u... par
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...IRJET Journal
18 vues6 diapositives
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknow par
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknowStructural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknow
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknowAnchit Agrawal
2.8K vues27 diapositives

Similaire à Structural Design(20)

Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptx par DP NITHIN
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptxAnalysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
DP NITHIN182 vues
IRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute Building par IRJET Journal
IRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute BuildingIRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute Building
IRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute Building
IRJET Journal41 vues
Design of Steel Grillage Foundation for an Auditorium par IRJET Journal
Design of Steel Grillage Foundation for an AuditoriumDesign of Steel Grillage Foundation for an Auditorium
Design of Steel Grillage Foundation for an Auditorium
IRJET Journal221 vues
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u... par IRJET Journal
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...
IRJET Journal18 vues
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknow par Anchit Agrawal
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknowStructural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknow
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknow
Anchit Agrawal2.8K vues
COMPARISON BETWEEN VARIOUS STEEL SECTION BY USING IS CODE AND EURO CODE par IRJET Journal
COMPARISON BETWEEN VARIOUS STEEL SECTION BY USING IS CODE AND EURO CODECOMPARISON BETWEEN VARIOUS STEEL SECTION BY USING IS CODE AND EURO CODE
COMPARISON BETWEEN VARIOUS STEEL SECTION BY USING IS CODE AND EURO CODE
IRJET Journal15 vues
IRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line System par IRJET Journal
IRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line SystemIRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line System
IRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line System
IRJET Journal35 vues
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptx par subhashini214160
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptxDESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptx
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptx
subhashini214160952 vues
350 kl overhead water intze tank design par Harish Mahavar
350 kl overhead water intze tank design350 kl overhead water intze tank design
350 kl overhead water intze tank design
Harish Mahavar1.1K vues
final internship ppt.pptx par KiranKr32
final internship ppt.pptxfinal internship ppt.pptx
final internship ppt.pptx
KiranKr3219 vues
Design of Bioclimatic Structure with Insulation of Cavity Wall par IRJET Journal
Design of  Bioclimatic Structure with Insulation of Cavity WallDesign of  Bioclimatic Structure with Insulation of Cavity Wall
Design of Bioclimatic Structure with Insulation of Cavity Wall
IRJET Journal30 vues
Cost Optimization of a Tubular Steel Truss Using Limit State Method of Design par IJERA Editor
Cost Optimization of a Tubular Steel Truss Using Limit State Method of DesignCost Optimization of a Tubular Steel Truss Using Limit State Method of Design
Cost Optimization of a Tubular Steel Truss Using Limit State Method of Design
IJERA Editor44 vues
Design and analysis of school building par Raghav Sankar
Design and analysis of school buildingDesign and analysis of school building
Design and analysis of school building
Raghav Sankar12.1K vues

Plus de Vj NiroSh

BSR - 2021 - Mullaitivu - District par
BSR - 2021 - Mullaitivu - District BSR - 2021 - Mullaitivu - District
BSR - 2021 - Mullaitivu - District Vj NiroSh
641 vues26 diapositives
BSR - 2021 - Kiliinochchi - District par
BSR - 2021 - Kiliinochchi - District BSR - 2021 - Kiliinochchi - District
BSR - 2021 - Kiliinochchi - District Vj NiroSh
387 vues26 diapositives
Irranaitivu R.C.T.M.S-Drawing file (Ori)_NoCopy par
Irranaitivu R.C.T.M.S-Drawing file (Ori)_NoCopyIrranaitivu R.C.T.M.S-Drawing file (Ori)_NoCopy
Irranaitivu R.C.T.M.S-Drawing file (Ori)_NoCopyVj NiroSh
374 vues45 diapositives
Vechile shed Sample Drawing par
Vechile shed Sample DrawingVechile shed Sample Drawing
Vechile shed Sample DrawingVj NiroSh
260 vues1 diapositive
CONCRETE BASICS A Guide to Concrete Practice par
CONCRETE BASICS A Guide to Concrete PracticeCONCRETE BASICS A Guide to Concrete Practice
CONCRETE BASICS A Guide to Concrete PracticeVj NiroSh
217 vues56 diapositives
Palimentory control in Tamil par
Palimentory control in Tamil Palimentory control in Tamil
Palimentory control in Tamil Vj NiroSh
373 vues67 diapositives

Plus de Vj NiroSh(20)

BSR - 2021 - Mullaitivu - District par Vj NiroSh
BSR - 2021 - Mullaitivu - District BSR - 2021 - Mullaitivu - District
BSR - 2021 - Mullaitivu - District
Vj NiroSh641 vues
BSR - 2021 - Kiliinochchi - District par Vj NiroSh
BSR - 2021 - Kiliinochchi - District BSR - 2021 - Kiliinochchi - District
BSR - 2021 - Kiliinochchi - District
Vj NiroSh387 vues
Irranaitivu R.C.T.M.S-Drawing file (Ori)_NoCopy par Vj NiroSh
Irranaitivu R.C.T.M.S-Drawing file (Ori)_NoCopyIrranaitivu R.C.T.M.S-Drawing file (Ori)_NoCopy
Irranaitivu R.C.T.M.S-Drawing file (Ori)_NoCopy
Vj NiroSh374 vues
Vechile shed Sample Drawing par Vj NiroSh
Vechile shed Sample DrawingVechile shed Sample Drawing
Vechile shed Sample Drawing
Vj NiroSh260 vues
CONCRETE BASICS A Guide to Concrete Practice par Vj NiroSh
CONCRETE BASICS A Guide to Concrete PracticeCONCRETE BASICS A Guide to Concrete Practice
CONCRETE BASICS A Guide to Concrete Practice
Vj NiroSh217 vues
Palimentory control in Tamil par Vj NiroSh
Palimentory control in Tamil Palimentory control in Tamil
Palimentory control in Tamil
Vj NiroSh373 vues
Document for Handing over the building par Vj NiroSh
Document for Handing over the buildingDocument for Handing over the building
Document for Handing over the building
Vj NiroSh283 vues
BSR - 2020 With OH&P par Vj NiroSh
BSR - 2020 With OH&PBSR - 2020 With OH&P
BSR - 2020 With OH&P
Vj NiroSh123 vues
Schedule of Rates - 2020 All Department par Vj NiroSh
Schedule of Rates - 2020 All DepartmentSchedule of Rates - 2020 All Department
Schedule of Rates - 2020 All Department
Vj NiroSh208 vues
Auto CAD - 2D par Vj NiroSh
Auto CAD - 2DAuto CAD - 2D
Auto CAD - 2D
Vj NiroSh3.7K vues
Adobe Photoshop- in Tamil par Vj NiroSh
Adobe Photoshop- in TamilAdobe Photoshop- in Tamil
Adobe Photoshop- in Tamil
Vj NiroSh317 vues
ATI Final Report par Vj NiroSh
ATI Final ReportATI Final Report
ATI Final Report
Vj NiroSh308 vues
Windows XP in தமிழ் par Vj NiroSh
Windows XP in தமிழ் Windows XP in தமிழ்
Windows XP in தமிழ்
Vj NiroSh198 vues
Builders of Quantity par Vj NiroSh
Builders of QuantityBuilders of Quantity
Builders of Quantity
Vj NiroSh74 vues
General notes to building schedule of rates par Vj NiroSh
General notes to building schedule of ratesGeneral notes to building schedule of rates
General notes to building schedule of rates
Vj NiroSh1.5K vues
AutoCAD - 3D Notes par Vj NiroSh
AutoCAD - 3D NotesAutoCAD - 3D Notes
AutoCAD - 3D Notes
Vj NiroSh1.7K vues
Industrial Training Report par Vj NiroSh
Industrial Training ReportIndustrial Training Report
Industrial Training Report
Vj NiroSh2.5K vues
SBD - 3 - ICTAD par Vj NiroSh
SBD - 3 - ICTADSBD - 3 - ICTAD
SBD - 3 - ICTAD
Vj NiroSh11.1K vues
Scope of consultancy services - ICTAD - consul par Vj NiroSh
Scope of consultancy services - ICTAD - consulScope of consultancy services - ICTAD - consul
Scope of consultancy services - ICTAD - consul
Vj NiroSh64 vues
Contract payment and variation par Vj NiroSh
Contract payment and variationContract payment and variation
Contract payment and variation
Vj NiroSh1.6K vues

Dernier

Design of Structures and Foundations for Vibrating Machines, Arya-ONeill-Pinc... par
Design of Structures and Foundations for Vibrating Machines, Arya-ONeill-Pinc...Design of Structures and Foundations for Vibrating Machines, Arya-ONeill-Pinc...
Design of Structures and Foundations for Vibrating Machines, Arya-ONeill-Pinc...csegroupvn
5 vues210 diapositives
START Newsletter 3 par
START Newsletter 3START Newsletter 3
START Newsletter 3Start Project
5 vues25 diapositives
Renewal Projects in Seismic Construction par
Renewal Projects in Seismic ConstructionRenewal Projects in Seismic Construction
Renewal Projects in Seismic ConstructionEngineering & Seismic Construction
5 vues8 diapositives
Investigation of Physicochemical Changes of Soft Clay around Deep Geopolymer ... par
Investigation of Physicochemical Changes of Soft Clay around Deep Geopolymer ...Investigation of Physicochemical Changes of Soft Clay around Deep Geopolymer ...
Investigation of Physicochemical Changes of Soft Clay around Deep Geopolymer ...AltinKaradagli
12 vues16 diapositives
fakenews_DBDA_Mar23.pptx par
fakenews_DBDA_Mar23.pptxfakenews_DBDA_Mar23.pptx
fakenews_DBDA_Mar23.pptxdeepmitra8
15 vues34 diapositives
Update 42 models(Diode/General ) in SPICE PARK(DEC2023) par
Update 42 models(Diode/General ) in SPICE PARK(DEC2023)Update 42 models(Diode/General ) in SPICE PARK(DEC2023)
Update 42 models(Diode/General ) in SPICE PARK(DEC2023)Tsuyoshi Horigome
33 vues16 diapositives

Dernier(20)

Design of Structures and Foundations for Vibrating Machines, Arya-ONeill-Pinc... par csegroupvn
Design of Structures and Foundations for Vibrating Machines, Arya-ONeill-Pinc...Design of Structures and Foundations for Vibrating Machines, Arya-ONeill-Pinc...
Design of Structures and Foundations for Vibrating Machines, Arya-ONeill-Pinc...
csegroupvn5 vues
Investigation of Physicochemical Changes of Soft Clay around Deep Geopolymer ... par AltinKaradagli
Investigation of Physicochemical Changes of Soft Clay around Deep Geopolymer ...Investigation of Physicochemical Changes of Soft Clay around Deep Geopolymer ...
Investigation of Physicochemical Changes of Soft Clay around Deep Geopolymer ...
AltinKaradagli12 vues
fakenews_DBDA_Mar23.pptx par deepmitra8
fakenews_DBDA_Mar23.pptxfakenews_DBDA_Mar23.pptx
fakenews_DBDA_Mar23.pptx
deepmitra815 vues
Update 42 models(Diode/General ) in SPICE PARK(DEC2023) par Tsuyoshi Horigome
Update 42 models(Diode/General ) in SPICE PARK(DEC2023)Update 42 models(Diode/General ) in SPICE PARK(DEC2023)
Update 42 models(Diode/General ) in SPICE PARK(DEC2023)
Ansari: Practical experiences with an LLM-based Islamic Assistant par M Waleed Kadous
Ansari: Practical experiences with an LLM-based Islamic AssistantAnsari: Practical experiences with an LLM-based Islamic Assistant
Ansari: Practical experiences with an LLM-based Islamic Assistant
Design_Discover_Develop_Campaign.pptx par ShivanshSeth6
Design_Discover_Develop_Campaign.pptxDesign_Discover_Develop_Campaign.pptx
Design_Discover_Develop_Campaign.pptx
ShivanshSeth632 vues
BCIC - Manufacturing Conclave - Technology-Driven Manufacturing for Growth par Innomantra
BCIC - Manufacturing Conclave -  Technology-Driven Manufacturing for GrowthBCIC - Manufacturing Conclave -  Technology-Driven Manufacturing for Growth
BCIC - Manufacturing Conclave - Technology-Driven Manufacturing for Growth
Innomantra 6 vues
2023Dec ASU Wang NETR Group Research Focus and Facility Overview.pptx par lwang78
2023Dec ASU Wang NETR Group Research Focus and Facility Overview.pptx2023Dec ASU Wang NETR Group Research Focus and Facility Overview.pptx
2023Dec ASU Wang NETR Group Research Focus and Facility Overview.pptx
lwang7883 vues
Generative AI Models & Their Applications par SN
Generative AI Models & Their ApplicationsGenerative AI Models & Their Applications
Generative AI Models & Their Applications
SN8 vues
GDSC Mikroskil Members Onboarding 2023.pdf par gdscmikroskil
GDSC Mikroskil Members Onboarding 2023.pdfGDSC Mikroskil Members Onboarding 2023.pdf
GDSC Mikroskil Members Onboarding 2023.pdf
gdscmikroskil53 vues
SUMIT SQL PROJECT SUPERSTORE 1.pptx par Sumit Jadhav
SUMIT SQL PROJECT SUPERSTORE 1.pptxSUMIT SQL PROJECT SUPERSTORE 1.pptx
SUMIT SQL PROJECT SUPERSTORE 1.pptx
Sumit Jadhav 15 vues

Structural Design

  • 1. Question:- A concrete car park structure is shown in the figure you are requested to design the following elements using BS-8110  Slab  Beam denoted by D and E  A pad footing  A column DATA’S:- 1) Finishes of 1 KN/m2 2) Imposed load on slab Of = [1 + 𝐵 10 ] KN/m2 3) Grade of concrete 25 N/mm2 4) Assume self-weight of block work is 20 KN/m3 5) Bearing pressure of ground soil 150 KN/m2 6) Cover for slab is 20 mm 7) Cover for beam is 25 mm 8) Cover for footing is 50 mm WHERE:-  “A” is a first digit of your Registration number.  “B” is a last digit of your Registration number. REQUREMENTS:-  Write your assumption clearly.  All work are to be under taken individually.  Submission date is 02/01/2016.  Late submission will not be accepted. P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:1
  • 2. P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:2 Calculation:- [My registration number is 41, First digit number (A) = 4,and second digit number (B) = 1] 1) Imposed load on slab = [1 + 𝐵 10 ] KN/m2 Solution: - Imposed load on slab (Qk) is = [1 + 1 10 ] KN/m2 = [1 + 0.1] KN/m2 = 1.1 KN/m2 2) Car Park Width is = [2.4 + 𝐴 10 ] m Solution: - Car Park Width is = [2.4 + 4 10 ] m = [2.4 + 0.4] m = 2.8 m [This design calculation Assume the finishes load only consider the slab]  Symbols:- 𝑓𝑦 – Characteristic strength of reinforcement 𝑓𝑦𝑣 – Characteristic strength of links 𝑓𝑐𝑢 – Characteristic strength of concrete 𝛾 𝑚 – Partial safety factor for strength of materials 𝑑 – Effective depth of the tension reinforcement 𝐴 𝑆 – Area of the tension reinforcement 𝐴 𝑆𝑉 – Total cross-section of links at the neutral axis 𝑏 – Width or Effective width of the section 𝐴 𝑆𝐶 – Area of vertical reinforcement 𝐺 𝑘 – Characteristic dead load 𝑄 𝑘 – Characteristic Imposed load 𝑙 𝑥 – Length of shorter side 𝑙 𝑦 – Length of longer side 𝑙 – Span of the beam 𝐻 – High yields steel 𝑀 – Design ultimate moment 𝑉 – Design shear force due to ultimate loads  𝑐 – Design concrete shear stress  – Design shear stress at a cross-section 𝑁 – Design axial force 𝑆 𝑉 – Spacing of links along the member 𝑐 – Column width 𝑙 𝐶 – Half the spacing between column centers 𝐴 𝐶 – Area of the concrete section 𝑓𝑆 – Estimated design service stress in the tension reinforcement 𝑙 𝑂 – Clear height between end restraints ℎ – Overall depth of the cross-section of a R/F
  • 4. h d c P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:4  Design of a reinforced roof slab ( BS 8110 ) A reinforced concrete roof subject to an imposed load of 1.1 KNm−2 spans between walls as shown below. Design the roof for 𝑓𝑐𝑢= 25 Nmm-2 and cover for slab is 20mm. [Assuming the following material strength 𝑓𝑦 = 460 Nmm-2 and Diameter of main steel (Φ) = 10 mm and Assume this slab is simply supported but normal condition is fixed support] a) ANALYSIS The car park area is 2800 mm x 6000 mm, so 𝑙 𝑥 = 2800 mm and 𝑙 𝑦 = 6000 mm 𝑙 𝑦 𝑙 𝑥 = 6000 2800 = 2.143 > 2, Hence this slab is one-way spanning slab. b) DEPTH OF SLAB [Assume the modification factor is 1.5] Minimum effective depth, dmin = 𝑆𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑐 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 ×𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 = 2800 20 ×1.5 = 93.333 mm Hence, assume effective depth of slab (d) = 95 mm. Overall depth of slab (h) = d + /2 + c = 95 + 10/2 + 20 = 120 mm c) LOADING  Dead Self-weight of slab = 0.120m × 24 kNm−3 = 2.880 KNm−2 Finishes = 1 KNm-2 Total Dead load (Gk) = 2.880 + 1 = 3.880 KNm-2 225 mm 2800 mm  (Basic ratio from table 3.9,BS-8110)
  • 5. P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:5  Imposed Total imposed load (Qk) = 1.1 KNm−2  Ultimate design load (For 1 m width of slab total ultimate load), W, is W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk) x width of slab × span = (1.4 × 3.880 + 1.6 × 1.1) x 1 × 2.80 = 20.138 KN d) MOMENT  Design moment (M) = 𝑊 ×𝐿 8 = 20.138 𝐾𝑁 ×2.80 𝑚 8 = 7.048 KNm  Ultimate design moment (Mu) = 0.156 𝑓𝑐𝑢bd2 = 0.156 x 25 Nmm-2 x 1 m x 952 mm2 = 35.197 KNm Since M < Mu, no compression reinforcement is required. e) MAIN STEEL  K = 𝑀 𝑓 𝑐𝑢 b𝑑2 = 7.048 × 106 25 ×1000 ×952 = 0.031  Z = 𝑑 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 𝐾 0.9⁄ ] = 95 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 0.031 0.9⁄ ] = 95 [ 0.964 ] mm = 91.607 mm > 0.95𝑑 (= 90.25 mm) Hence Z = 0.95𝑑 (= 90.25 mm)  As = 𝑀 0.95 × 𝑓𝑦 ×𝑍 = 7.048 × 106 0.95 ×460 ×90.25 = 178.705 mm2/m  Asmin = 0.13% Ac = 0.0013 x 1000 x 120 = 156 mm2/m < As Width of slab (Asmin from table 3.25,BS-8110)
  • 6. For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 10 mm diameter bars spaced at 300 mm  H10 @ 300 mm centers (As = 262mm2/m). f) ACTUAL MODIFICATION FACTOR  Design services stress, 𝑓𝑠 = 2 3 × 𝑓𝑦 × 𝐴𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑞 𝐴𝑠 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣 = 2 3 × 460 × 178.705 262.00 = 209.171 Nmm-2  Modification factor = 0.55 + (477 − 𝑓𝑠) 120 × [0.9 + 𝑀 𝑏𝑑2] = 0.55 + (477−209.171) 120 × [0.9+ 7.048 ×106 1000 ×952 ] = 0.55 + 267.829 120 × [0.9+ 0.781] = 0.55 + 1.328 = 1.878 < 2 , This factor satisfy for this case.  Hence, New dmin = 𝑆𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑐 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 ×𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 = 2800 20 ×1.878 = 74.547 mm < assume d = 95 mm Therefore take d = 95 mm and provide H10 @ 300 mm Centers as main steel. g) SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT This is one way-spanning slab, hence secondary reinforcement Based on minimum steel area = 156 mm2/m. Assume secondary reinforcement diameter () 8 mm. Hence from using steel area tables, provide H8 @ 300 mm Centre’s (As = 168 mm2/m). (Note that the condition 𝛽 𝑏 ≤ 1does not apply hear) P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:6
  • 7. d=95 mm h) DEFLECTION  Actual 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ = 2800 95 = 29.474  Permissible 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ = Basic ratio x modification factor = 20 x 1.878 = 37.560 Hence Actual 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ < Permissible 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ Hence defection check is satisfy. i) SHEAR REINFORCEMENT Since slab is symmetrically loaded RA = RB = 𝑊 2 = 20.138 2 = 10.069 KN  Ultimate shear force (V ) = 10.069 KN And design shear stress, is  = 𝑉 𝑏 𝑣 𝑑 = 10.069 × 103 1000 × 95 = 0.106 Nmm-2  Design concrete shear stress, c c = 0.79 { 100 𝐴𝑠 𝑏 𝑣 𝑑 } 1 3⁄ ( 400 𝑑 ) 1 4⁄ 𝛾 𝑚 c = 0.79 { 100 ×262 1000 × 95 } 1 3⁄ ( 400 95 ) 1 4⁄ 1.25 c = 0.79 ×0.6509 ×1.4325 1.25 = 0.7366 Nmm-2 From Table 3.16 for BS-8110, since  < c, no shear reinforcement is required. Main steel Secondary steel RBRA 2800 mm W V V (c from table 3.8,BS-8110) P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:7
  • 8. j) REINFORCEMENT DETAILS k) CHECK SPACING BETWEEN BARS Maximum spacing between bars should not exceed the lesser of 3d (= 285 mm) or 750 mm. Actual spacing = 300 mm main steel and 300 mm secondary steel. OK. l) MAXIMUM CRACK WITH Since the slab depth does not exceed 200 mm, the above spacing between bars will automatically ensure that the maximum permissible crack width of 0.3 mm will not be exceeded. (from clause 3.12.11.2.7,BS- 88110) (from clause 3.12.11.2.1,BS- 88110) P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:8
  • 9. REINFORCEMENT BEAM BS 8110 : 1997 PART – 1 , SECTION 3 , CLAUSE 3.4 [ Beams ] P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:9
  • 10.  Design of a reinforced beam ( BS 8110 ) A reinforced concrete roof slab to an imposed load of 1.1 KNm−2, self-weight of block work is 20 KN/m3. Design the beam for 𝑓𝑐𝑢= 25 Nmm-2 and cover for beam is 25 mm. [Assuming the following material strength 𝑓𝑦 = 460 Nmm-2 and 𝑓𝑦𝑣= 250 Nmm-2] Figure of the one-way spanning slab load distribution as shown above. It is supported by beams in only 2 sides, so beam-D is load distribution beam and beam-E is non load distribution beam Design of a beam - D D – Beam as shown below: a) LOADING  Dead Self-weight of slab = 0.120 m x 1.2875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 3.7080 KNm−1 Self-weight of beam = 0.225 m x 0.500 m x 24 KNm−3 = 2.70 KNm−1 Finishes of slab = 1.2875 m x 1 KNm-2 = 1.2875 KNm−1 Block wall load = 0.125 m x 1.00 m x 20 KNm−3 = 2.50 KNm−1 Total Dead load (Gk) = 3.708 + 2.70 + 1.2875 + 2.50 = 10.1955 KNm-1  Imposed Total imposed load (Qk) = 1.2875 m x 1.1 KNm−2 = 1.4163 KNm-1  Ultimate design load Total ultimate load, W is W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk) × span = (1.4 × 10.1955 + 1.6 × 1.4163) × 6.0 m = 99.2387 KN Beam - D Beam- E 225 mm 6000 mm h=500 mm b=225 mm SECTION OF BEAM Load distribution Direction P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:10
  • 11. b) MOMENT  Design moment (M) = 𝑊 ×𝐿 8 = 99.2387 × 6.0 8 = 74.4290 KNm c) EFFECTIVE DEPTH  Assume diameter of main bars (Φ) = 20 mm  Assume diameter of links (Φ′) = 8 mm  Cover for beam Δc = 25 mm. d = h − c − Φ′ − Φ/2 = 500 − 25 − 8 − 20/2 = 457 mm d) ULTIMATE MOMENT OF RESISTENT  Ultimate design moment (Mu) = 0.156𝑓𝑐𝑢 bd2 = 0.156 x 25 Nmm-2 x 0.225 m x 4572 mm2 = 183.265 KNm Since M < Mu, no compression reinforcement is required. e) MAIN STEEL  K = 𝑀 𝑓 𝑐𝑢 b𝑑2 = 74.4290 × 106 25 × 225 × 4572 = 0.0634  Z = 𝑑 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 𝐾 0.9⁄ ] = 457 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 0.0634 0.9⁄ ] = 457 [ 1.0661 ] mm = 487.1977 mm > 0.95𝑑 (= 434.150 mm) Hence Z = 420.2828 mm  As = 𝑀 0.95 × 𝑓𝑦 ×𝑍 = 74.4290 × 106 0.95 ×460 ×420.2828 = 405.2464 mm2  Asmin = 0.13% Ac = 0.0013 x 225 x 500 = 146.250 mm2 < As For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 20 mm diameter 2 bars .  2H20 (As = 628 mm2) P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:11
  • 12. Effective span (clause 3.4.1.2, BS 8110) The above calculations were based on an effective span of 6 m, but this needs to be confirmed. For a simply supported beam this should be taken as the lesser of (1) The distance between centers of bearings, A, or (2) The clear distance between supports, D, plus the effective depth, d, of the beam  Clear distance between supports = 6000 mm – 225 mm = 5775 mm  Clear distance + effective depth = 5775 mm + 457 mm = 6232 mm Assumed span length of 6 m is correct. f) DEFLECTION  Actual 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ = 6000 457 = 13.129  Design services stress, 𝑓𝑠 = 2 3 × 𝑓𝑦 × 𝐴𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑞 𝐴𝑠 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣 = 2 3 × × 405.2464 628.00 = 197.8910 Nmm-2  Modification factor = 0.55 + (477 − 𝑓𝑠) 120 × [0.9 + 𝑀 𝑏𝑑2] = 0.55 + (477−197.8910) 120 × [0.9+ 74.4290 ×106 225 × 4572 ] = 0.55 + 279.1090 120 × [0.9+ 1.5839] = 0.55 + 0.9364 = 1.4864 < 2 , This factor satisfy for this case.  Permissible 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ = Basic ratio x modification factor = 20 x 1.4864 = 29.7279 Hence Actual 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ < Permissible 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ The beam therefore satisfies the deflection criteria in BS 8110. 460 P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:12
  • 13. g) SHEAR REINFORCEMENT Ultimate design load W = 104.093 KN Since beam is symmetrically loaded RA = RB = 𝑊 2 = 99.2387 2 = 49.6194 KN  Ultimate shear force (V ) = 49.6194 KN And shear stress, is  = 𝑉 𝑏 𝑣 𝑑 = 49.6194 × 103 225 × 457 = 0.4826 Nmm-2 < Permissible = 0.8√𝑓𝑐𝑢 h) SPACING OF LINKS All through the shear force will be maximum at the face of the support. The design shear force for uniformly distributed load is at the section “d” from the face  Calculate the design shear force 𝑉 𝑑 3000−𝑑 = 𝑉 3000 𝑉 𝑑 3000−457 = 49.6194 3000 Vdesign = 42.0607 KN  Calculate the design shear stress, d is d = 𝑉 𝑑 𝑏 𝑣 𝑑 = 42.0607 × 103 225 × 457 = 0.4091 Nmm-2  Design concrete shear stress, c c = { 100 𝐴𝑠 𝑏 𝑣 𝑑 } 1 3⁄ ( 400 𝑑 ) 1 4⁄ 𝛾 𝑚 c = { 100 ×628 225× 457 } 1 3⁄ ( 400 457 ) 1 4⁄ 1.25 c = 0.79 × 0.8484 ×0.9672 1.25 = 0.5186 Nmm-2 RBRA 6000 mm W V V [= 0.8√25 = 4 Nmm-2 ] VVdd V Vdesing 3000 mm 0.79 0.79 P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:13
  • 14.  0.5c = 0.5 x 0.5186 = 0.2593 Nmm-2  c + 0.4 = 0.5186 + 0.4 = 0.9186 Nmm-2 Hence, 0.5 𝑐 <  𝑑 < (  𝑐 + 0.4 ) Design links required according to 𝐴 𝑠𝑣 ≥ 0.4 𝑏 𝑣 𝑆 𝑣 0.95 𝑓𝑦𝑣 [Diameter of link 8 mm and 𝑓𝑦𝑣 = 250 Nmm-2]  𝐴 𝑠𝑣 = 2 × 𝜋 4 × 𝑑2 = 2 × 𝜋 4 × 82 = 100.531 mm2 Hence 100.531 ≥ 0.4 × 225 × 𝑆 𝑣 0.95 ×250 𝑆 𝑣 ≤ 100.531 ×0.95 ×250 0.4 ×225 𝑆 𝑣 ≤ 265.29 mm Maximum spacing of links is 0.75d = 0.75 × 457 = 342.75 mm. Hence provide H8 links at 200 mm centers. i) REINFORMATION DETAILS The sketch below shows the main reinforcement requirements for the beam “D” (from Table 3.7 ,BS-88110) P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:14
  • 15. Design of a beam - E E – Beam as shown below: Self-weight of block work is 20 KN/m3. Design the beam for 𝑓𝑐𝑢= 25 Nmm-2 and cover for beam is 25 mm. [Assuming the following material strength 𝑓𝑦 = 250 Nmm-2 ] a) LOADING  Dead Self-weight of beam = 0.225 m x 0.300 m x 24 KNm−3 = 1.62 KNm−1 Block wall load = 0.125 m x 1.00 m x 20 KNm−3 = 2.50 KNm−1 Total Dead load (Gk) = 1.62 + 2.50 = 4.120 KNm-1  Imposed Total imposed load (Qk) = 0.00  Ultimate design load Total ultimate load, W is W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk) × span = (1.4 × 4.120 + 1.6 × 0.00) × 2.8 m = 16.15 KN b) MOMENT  Design moment (M) = 𝑊 ×𝐿 8 = 16.15 ×2.8 8 = 5.653 KNm c) EFFECTIVE DEPTH  Assume diameter of main bars (Φ) = 10 mm  Assume diameter of links (Φ′) = 6 mm 225 mm 2800 mm h=300 mm b=225 mm SECTION OF BEAM P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:15
  • 16.  Cover for beam Δc = 25 mm. d = h − c − Φ′ − Φ/2 = 300 − 25 − 6 − 10/2 = 264 mm d) ULTIMATE MOMENT OF RESISTENT  Ultimate design moment (Mu) = 0.156𝑓𝑐𝑢 bd2 = 0.156 x 25 Nmm-2 x 0.225 m x 2642 mm2 = 61.158 KNm Since M < Mu, no compression reinforcement is required. e) MAIN STEEL  K = 𝑀 𝑓 𝑐𝑢 b𝑑2 = 5.653 × 106 25 ×225 ×2642 = 0.014419  Z = 𝑑 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 𝐾 0.9⁄ ] = 264 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 0.014419 0.9⁄ ] = 264 [ 0.9837 ] mm = 259.6968 mm > 0.95𝑑 (= 250.80 mm) Hence Z = 0.95𝑑 (= 250.80 mm)  As = 𝑀 0.95 × 𝑓𝑦 ×𝑍 = 5.633 × 106 0.95 ×250 ×250.80 = 138.216 mm2  Asmin = 0.24% Ac = 0.0024 x 225 x 300 = 162.00 mm2 > As For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 10 mm diameter 3 bars .  3H10 (As = 236 mm2) Effective span (clause 3.4.1.2, BS 8110) The above calculations were based on an effective span of 2.8 m, but this needs to be confirmed. For a simply supported beam this should be taken as the lesser of (Asmin from table 3.25,BS-8110) P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:16
  • 17.  Clear distance between supports = 2800 mm – 225 mm = 2575 mm  Clear distance + effective depth = 2575 mm + 264 mm = 2839 mm Assumed span length of 2.8 m is correct. f) DEFLECTION  Actual 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ = 2800 264 = 10.6061  Design services stress, 𝑓𝑠 = 2 3 × 𝑓𝑦 × 𝐴𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑞 𝐴𝑠 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣 = 2 3 × × 138.216 236.00 = 97.6102 Nmm-2  Modification factor = 0.55 + (477 − 𝑓𝑠) 120 × [0.9 + 𝑀 𝑏𝑑2] = 0.55 + (477−97.6102) 120 × [0.9+ 5.653 ×106 225 × 2642] = 0.55 + 379.3898 120 × [0.9+ 0.3605] = 0.55 + 2.5082 = 3.0582 > 2 , This factor not satisfy for this case. Hence, This beam cross-section (225 mm x 300 mm) is not satisfy for this load distribution So we can change the dimension, assume this cross-section and again design the beam-E  Cross-section = 225 mm x 180 mm g) LOADING  Dead Self-weight of beam = 0.225 m x 0.180 m x 24 KNm−3 = 0.972 KNm−1 Block wall load = 0.125 m x 1.00 m x 20 KNm−3 = 2.50 KNm−1 Total Dead load (Gk) = 0.972 + 2.50 = 3.472 KNm-1  Imposed Total imposed load (Qk) = 0.00 250 h=180 mm b=225 mm SECTION OF BEAM (Table 3.10 for BS-8110) P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:17
  • 18.  Ultimate design load Total ultimate load, W is W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk) × span = (1.4 × 3.472 + 1.6 × 0.00) × 2.8 m = 13.610 KN h) MOMENT  Design moment (M) = 𝑊 ×𝐿 8 = 13.610 × 2.8 8 = 4.7646 KNm i) EFFECTIVE DEPTH  Assume diameter of main bars (Φ) = 10 mm  Assume diameter of links (Φ′) = 6 mm  Cover for beam Δc = 25 mm. d = h − c − Φ′ − Φ/2 = 180 − 25 − 6 − 10/2 = 144 mm j) ULTIMATE MOMENT OF RESISTENT  Ultimate design moment (Mu) = 0.156𝑓𝑐𝑢 bd2 = 0.156 x 25 Nmm-2 x 0.225 m x 1442 mm2 = 18.1958 KNm Since M < Mu, no compression reinforcement is required. k) MAIN STEEL  K = 𝑀 𝑓 𝑐𝑢 b𝑑2 = 4.7646 × 106 25 ×225 ×1442 = 0.040849  Z = 𝑑 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 𝐾 0.9⁄ ] = 144 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 0.040849 0.9⁄ ] = 144 [ 0.9523 ] mm = 137.1371 mm > 0.95𝑑 (= 136.80 mm) Hence Z = 0.95𝑑 (= 136.80 mm)  As = 𝑀 0.95 × 𝑓𝑦 ×𝑍 = 4.7646 × 106 0.95 ×250 ×136.80 = 146.6482 mm2 P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:18
  • 19.  Asmin = 0.24% Ac = 0.0024 x 225 x 180 = 97.20 mm2 < As For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 10 mm diameter 2 bars .  2H10 (As = 157.00 mm2) l) DEFLECTION  Actual 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ = 2800 144 = 19.4444  Design services stress, 𝑓𝑠 = 2 3 × 𝑓𝑦 × 𝐴𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑞 𝐴𝑠 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣 = 2 3 × × 146.6482 157 = 155.6775 Nmm-2  Modification factor = 0.55 + (477 − 𝑓𝑠) 120 × [0.9 + 𝑀 𝑏𝑑2] = 0.55 + (477−155.6775) 120 × [0.9+ 4.7646 ×106 225 × 1442 ] = 0.55 + 321.3225 120 × [0.9+ 1.0212] = 0.55 + 1.3937 = 1.9437 < 2 , This factor satisfy for this case.  Permissible 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ = Basic ratio x modification factor = 20 x 1.9437 = 38.8749 Hence Actual 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ < Permissible 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ The beam therefore satisfies the deflection criteria in BS 8110. j) SHEAR REINFORCEMENT Ultimate design load W = 12.9752 KN Since beam is symmetrically loaded RA = RB = 𝑊 2 = 13.610 2 = 6.8050 KN 250 RBRA 2800 mm W V V P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:19
  • 20.  Ultimate shear force (V ) = 6.8050 KN And shear stress, is  = 𝑉 𝑏 𝑣 𝑑 = 6.8050 × 103 225 × 144 = 0.2100 Nmm-2 < Permissible = 0.8√𝑓𝑐𝑢 k) SPACING OF LINKS All through the shear force will be maximum at the face of the support. The design shear force for uniformly distributed load is at the section “d” from the face  Calculate the design shear force 𝑉 𝑑 1400−𝑑 = 𝑉 1400 𝑉 𝑑 1400−144 = 6.8050 1400 Vdesign = 6.1051 KN  Calculate the design shear stress, d is d = 𝑉 𝑑 𝑏 𝑣 𝑑 = 6.1051 × 103 225 × 144 = 0.1884 Nmm-2  Design concrete shear stress, c c = { 100 𝐴𝑠 𝑏 𝑣 𝑑 } 1 3⁄ ( 400 𝑑 ) 1 4⁄ 𝛾 𝑚 c = { 100 ×157 225× 144 } 1 3⁄ ( 400 144 ) 1 4⁄ 1.25 c = 0.79 × 0.7854 ×1.2910 1.25 = 0.6408 Nmm-2  0.5c = 0.5 x 0.6408 = 0.3204Nmm-2 design < 0.5c , shear reinforcement may not be necessary. l) REINFORMATION DETAILS The sketch below shows the main reinforcement requirements for the beam “E” [= 0.8√25 = 4 Nmm-2 ] V Vdd V Vd 1400 mm 0.79 0.79 C–25mm P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:20
  • 21. REINFORCEMENT BASES BS 8110 : 1997 PART – 1 , SECTION 3 , CLAUSE 3.11 [ Bases ] P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:21
  • 22.  Design of a reinforced foundation ( BS 8110 ) A 225 mm square column carries a load transmit to foundation, safe bearing capacity of the soil is 150 KNm-2. Design a square pad footing to resist the load.𝑓𝑐𝑢= 25 Nmm-2 [Assuming the following material strength 𝑓𝑦 = 250 Nmm-2] a) LOADING  Dead Self-weight of slab = 0.120 m x 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 10.7069 KN Self-weight of beam-E = 0.225 m x 0.180 x 1.2875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 1.2515 KN Self-weight of beam-D = 0.225 m x 0.500 m x 2.8875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 7.796 KN Self-weight of column = 0.225 m x 0.225 m x 3.5 m x 24 KNm−3 = 4.2525 KN Finishes of slab = 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 1 KNm-2 = 3.7177 KN Block wall load = 0.125 m x 1.00 m x 4.50 m x 20 KNm−3 = 11.250 KN Total Dead load (Gk) = 10.7069 + 1.2515 + 7.796 + 4.2525 + 3.7177 + 11.250 = 38.9746 KN  Imposed Total imposed load (Qk) = 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 1.1 kNm−2 = 4.0894 KN  Ultimate design load Total ultimate load, W is W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk) = (1.4 × 38.9746 + 1.6 × 4.0894) = 61.1075 KN  Serviceability load Design axial load = 𝑈𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 1.45 = 61.1075 1.45 = 42.1431 KN. Beam - D Beam- E Design Area 3.0 m 1.4 m P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:22
  • 23.  Total weight Total weight including footing weight = Serviceability load + 8% of Axial load = 42.1431 + 8 ×42.1431 100 = 45.5145 KN. b) PLAN AREA Plan area of base = 𝑁 𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑖𝑙 = 45.5145 150 = 0.3034 m2 = 303430.00 mm2 Hence provide a 600 mm square base (plan area 0.36 m2) c) SELF-WEIGHT OF FOOTING [Assume the overall depth of footing (h) = 150 mm]  Self-weight of footing = Area x h x density of concrete = 0.36 x 0.15 x 24 KNm-3 = 1.296 KN  Actual total load = 42.1431 + 1.296 = 43.4391 KN  Actual earth pressure (Ps) = 𝑊 𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑛 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 = 43.4391 0.36 = 120.6642 KNm-2 Ps < Bearing capacity of soil d) DESIGN MOMENT  Total ultimate load (W) = 1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk = 61.1075 KN  Earth pressure (Pe) = Ultimate load Area = 61.1075 0.36 = 169.7431 KNm-2 0.1875 m 0.1875 m 0.225 m 168.9317 KNm-2 P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:23
  • 24. davg cover Φ  Maximum design moment (M) = Resultant force x length (Occurs at face of column) = ( 169.7431 x 0.6 x 0.1875 ) x 0.1875 2 = 19.0961 x 0.0938 = 1.7912 KNm e) ULTIMATE MOMENT Base to be cast against blinding, hence cover (c) to reinforcement = 50 mm (Assume 10 mm diameter (Φ) bars will be needed as bending reinforcement in both directions. Hence, average effective depth of reinforcement, davg is  davg = h – cover – Φ = 150 – 50 – 10 = 90 mm  Ultimate design moment (Mu) = 0.156𝑓𝑐𝑢 bd2 = 0.156 x 25 Nmm-2 x 0.6 m x 902 mm2 = 18.9540 KNm Since M < Mu, no compression reinforcement is required. f) MAIN STEEL  K = 𝑀 𝑓 𝑐𝑢 b𝑑2 = 1.7912 × 106 25 ×600 × 902 = 0.0147  Z = 𝑑 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 𝐾 0.9⁄ ] = 90 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 0.0147 0.9⁄ ] = 90 [ 0.9834 ] mm = 88.5052 mm > 0.95𝑑 (= 85.50 mm) Hence Z = 0.95𝑑 (= 85.50 mm)  As = 𝑀 0.95 × 𝑓𝑦 ×𝑍 = 1.7912 × 106 0.95 ×250 × 85.5 = 88.2093 mm2  Asmin = 0.24% Ac = 0.0024 x 600 x 150 = 216.00 mm2 > As P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:24
  • 25. For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 10 mm diameter 3 bars.  3H10 (As = 236 mm2) g) DISTRIBUTION OF REINFORCEMENT (See clause 3.11.3.2, BS 8110)  𝑙 𝑐 = 600/2 = 300 mm  3𝑐 4 + 9𝑑 4 = 3 × 225 4 + 9 ×90 4 = 371.25 mm  𝑙 𝑐 < 3𝑐 4 + 9𝑑 4 Hence, provide 3H10 (As = 236 mm2) distributed uniformly across the full width of the footing parallel to the x–x and y–y axis. h) PUNCH SHEAR  Critical perimeter, pcrit, is [ pcrit = column perimeter + 8 × 1.5d ] OR [ pcrit = 4 ( 225 + 3d ) ] pcrit = ( 4 x 225 ) + ( 8 x 1.5 x 90 ) = 1980 mm  Area within perimeter is = ( 225 + 3d )2 = ( 225 + 3 x 90 )2 = 0.2450 x 106 mm2  Ultimate punching force, V, is V = load on shaded area = 169.7431 × ( 0.36 – 0.245) = 19.5205 KN  Design punching shear stress,  , is  = 𝑉 𝑃 𝑐𝑟𝑖 ×𝑑 = 19.5205 ×103 1980 ×90 = 0.1095 Nmm-2 < Permissible = 0.8√𝑓𝑐𝑢  Design concrete shear stress, c c = { 100 𝐴𝑠 𝑏 𝑣 𝑑 } 1 3⁄ ( 400 𝑑 ) 1 4⁄ 𝛾 𝑚 1.5d 225 + 3d 0.79 [= 0.8√25 = 4 Nmm-2 ] P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:25
  • 26. c = { 100 ×88.2093 600 × 90 } 1 3⁄ ( 400 90 ) 1 4⁄ 1.25 c = 0.79 × 0.5466 ×1.4520 1.25 = 0.5016 Nmm-2 Since c >  , punching failure is unlikely and a 150 mm depth of slab is acceptable. i) REINFORMATION DETAILS The sketch below shows the main reinforcement requirements for the foundation 0.79 P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:26
  • 27. REINFORCEMENT COLUMN BS 8110 : 1997 PART – 1 , SECTION 3 , CLAUSE 3.8 [ Columns ] P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:27
  • 28.  Design of a reinforced column ( BS 8110 ) A column may be considered to be unbraced if the lateral loads are resisted by the sway action of the column [Assume this is unbraced column] a) CLASSIFICATION OF A CONCRETE COLUMN  For bending in the “Y” direction: End condition at top of column = 2 End condition at bottom of column = 2 Hence from Table 3.20,BS-8110, βx = 1.5 𝑙 𝑒𝑦 ℎ = 𝛽 𝑦 𝑙 𝑜 ℎ = 1.5 × 3320 225 = 22.1333 > 10  For bending in the “X” direction: End condition at top of column = 1 End condition at bottom of column = 2 Hence from Table 3.20,BS-8110, βy = 1.3 𝑙 𝑒𝑥 𝑏 = 𝛽𝑥 𝑙 𝑜 𝑏 = 1.3 × 3000 225 = 17.3333 > 10 Since both 𝑙 𝑒𝑥 ℎ and 𝑙 𝑒𝑦 𝑏 are both greater than 10, the column is SLENDER. 180 P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:28
  • 29. Design the longitudinal steel and links for a 225 mm square, slender-Unbraced column which supports the following axial loads: 𝑓𝑐𝑢= 25 Nmm-2 [Assuming the following material strength 𝑓𝑦 = 460 Nmm-2 and 𝑓𝑦𝑣= 250 Nmm-2 and Diameter of main steel (Φ) = 12 mm, diameter of links (Φ′) = 6 mm] b) LOADING  Dead Self-weight of slab = 0.120 m x 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 10.7069 KN Self-weight of beam-E = 0.225 m x 0.180 x 1.2875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 1.2515 KN Self-weight of beam-D = 0.225 m x 0.500 m x 2.8875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 7.796 KN Self-weight of column = 0.225 m x 0.225 m x 3.5 m x 24 KNm−3 = 4.2525 KN Finishes of slab = 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 1 KNm-2 = 3.7177 KN Block wall load = 0.125 m x 1.00 m x 4.50 m x 20 KNm−3 = 11.250 KN Total Dead load (Gk) = 10.7069 + 1.2515 + 7.796 + 4.2525 + 3.7177 + 11.250 = 38.9746 KN  Imposed Total imposed load (Qk) = 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 1.1 kNm−2 = 4.0894 KN  Ultimate design load Total ultimate load, W is W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk) = (1.4 × 38.9746 + 1.6 × 4.0894) = 61.1075 KN c) LONGITUDINAL STEEL Since column is axially loaded, use equation 28, BS-8110. N = 0.4 𝑓𝑐𝑢 𝐴 𝑐𝑜𝑛 + 0.8 𝑓𝑦 𝐴 𝑠𝑐 61.1075 x 103 = 0.4 x 25 x (2252 - Asc) + 0.8 x 460 x Asc 61107.5 = 506250.0 – 10 Asc + 368 Asc 358 Asc = - 445142.50 Hence, no require for reinforcement steels for this column. Asc Minimum = 0.13%Ac = 0.0013 x 225 x 255 = 65.8125 mm2 P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:29
  • 30. For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 12 mm diameter 1 bar. e) SIZE AND MINIMUM NUMBER OF BARS From clause 3.12.5.3, BS 8110 . Columns with rectangular cross-sections should be reinforced with a minimum of four longitudinal bars and each of the bars should not be less than 12 mm in diameter.  Hence, provide 12 mm diameter 4 bars.  4H12 (As = 452 mm2) f) LINKS - (clause 3.12.7, BS 8110)  Size of links. Links should be at one-quarter of the size of the largest longitudinal bar or 6 mm, whichever is the greater. That is = 1 4 × 12 = 3 mm , but not less than 6mm diameter.  The spacing of the links, is the lesser of (a) 12 times the diameter of the smallest longitudinal bar, that is, 12 × 12 = 144 mm, or (b) The smallest cross-sectional dimension of the column (= 225 mm).  Provide H6 links at 125 mm centers. g) REINFORMATION DETAILS The sketch below shows the main reinforcement requirements for the column PLAN SECTION P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:30