1. Teacher professional development
with a wow-factor
Seeing beyond tomorrow:
Innovative and emerging features
European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC)
Human Capital & Employment
SLIDES at: https://www.slideshare.net/vuorikari/
3. Outline
A. Context and aim of the study within the EU
B. Some examples of models and practices
C. Take-home messages
4. Context
Teachers are busy folks. There are many professional and personal
demands for their time. How can PD fit in?
Our research question: What kind of PD practices have emerged as a
"workaround" to overcome/remove the known barriers and to meet the needs?
Needs for PD:
• 57% ICT skills for teaching
• 48% Teaching for diversity
• 41% Student counselling and behavioural issues
• 40% Teaching transversal, soft and future skills
Barriers:
• 51% conflicts with the work schedule
• 48% lack of incentives
• 48% lack of support from employer
• 44% of teachers consider PD activities expensive
7. Features
• Shift from training an individual to
training a group of teachers (targeting
multiple actors in the school)
• PD takes place onsite in school
• Time set aside to collaborate,
team-teach, peer-observe
• Coaching support (by external or
internal one), peer mentoring
• Focus on learning how to collaborate with
colleagues of the school using existing
resources (curriculum, resources)
• Proven models that work elsewhere
(e.g. Lean-manufacturing, Sinus for math)
Workarounds
• Fitted into the work schedule (demands
time allocation by school head)
• Supported by employer
• No costs and no need to commute
• No prerequisits
1. School as a learning organisation
10. Features
• Moves teachers towards competence-
oriented approaches in education
• teachers co-create a condusive
environment for students to practice key
competences, soft skills and transfersal
themes (e.g. taking initiative, creativity)
• For teachers to learn how to enable
learner agency
• Students to become teachers to others,
to mentor fellow students, to plan
activities
• Blurres boundaries between teacher,
student, parent, local
Workarounds
• PD topics are those that teachers
say they need: future skills,
teaching for diversity, multi-
cultural setting
2. Empowering through competence-oriented
approach
11. Features
• Digital delivery still a novelty but can be
efficient in reaching large numbers in
short time
• New implementations emerge, e.g.
MOOCs open to everyone, video to
replace classroom visits and to model
good practices, micro-learning & nano
courses
• Variations in length and depth of the
content, but also in taking advantage of
self-paced vs. synchronous sessions
Workarounds
• Digital delivery helps avoid conflicts with
work schedule
• Digital delivery can open content to larger
audience (e.g. no prerequisites to attend)
• Micro-learning can help to make time for
PD within otherwise busy work schedule
3. Innovating online delivery of PD
12. Workarounds
• Hands-on sessions onsite in the classroom add a
component of active learning - help transfer
knowledge into practice and root PD in one's own
context
• Reflective sessions with experts and colleagues
allow teachers to solicit feedback
• Recognistion and support for teacher networks start
emerging by school heads and ed authorities –
making the best out of top-down and bottom-up
4. Re-inventing blended learning
Features
• Blended learning re-invented:
• Traditional online courses now mixed with
onsite in school practical hands-on
periods with authentic tasks
• A reflective session to review the
experience and what was learnt
• No more traditional "online only"
networks but ones that start blending
digital and physical activities in the
professional context – "the best of both
worlds"
• start to be supported/organised by
education authorities
13. Features Workarounds
• Active learning engages teachers directly
in trying out classroom and teaching
strategies allowing experiencing them
first-hand
• Authentic activities and artefacts allow for
deeply embedded and contextualised
professional learning
5. Engaging in first-hand experiences
Features
• Professional learning situated in the real-
world context, "learning by doing it first-
hand"
• moves PD away from traditional
settings
• Disruptive models of conducting PD
• Shadow a student-challenge;
• Pedagogical hackathons;
• Escape rooms;
14. Features
• Degree programmes in tertiary education
start reinventing themselves to better
answer to teachers' PD needs
• Programmes mix non-traditional topics
and include those that are not part of
traditional teaching degrees
• Programmes also mix more traditional
academic work with online and active
hands-on experiences
• Not all qualification programmes are
accredited through traditional methods
Workarounds
• Traditionally rigid degree
programmes add appealing topics
to their offerings by offering "non-
traditional" or "private degrees"
• Foundations start offering stipends
for their degree programmes to
help financing
6. Innovating qualification programmes
15. Features
• Social partners, e.g. philanthropy,
foundations
• As (accredited) providers of PD
• Creating content of PD
• Partnering-up
• Industry involved, but in "our own" terms
• For teachers by teachers:
teacher entrepreneurial activities
generating (social) value for the
community
Workarounds
• Social partners can offer privileged
PD topics and bring in new
perspectives
• Teacher micro-entrepreneurs
reinvent career paths within
teaching profession
7. Innovating partnerships and new actors
16. Outline
A. Context and aim of the study within the EU
B. Some examples of models and practices
C. Take-home messages
17. Yes, we are starting to see some
changes
• new models and novel features that can go
around, or even remove, the known
barriers emerge thanks to both process and
product innovation
• PD offers mix more than one type of activity
and mode of delivery, about a half uses digital
technologies in addition to other modes, giving
more structure to professional (peer) learning.
• Interesting 3rd party providers (e.g. not-for-
profit associations to philanthropy, corporate
responsibility programmes and small
entrepreneurs in the field of education, but also
volunteering individuals).
But…
• These new models and emerging features
are not necessarily very known yet by
traditional providers of teacher PD, they
are not streamlined in current offerings,
and not at scale yet.
• Many examples are offered outside of
"official" PD provision with no
accreditation or other support
mechanisms.
• The impact of these features on changing
teachers' classroom practices and
enhancing student learning outcomes
need more research.
So, are teachers' needs better addressed in terms
of PD offerings?
18. JRC Publications on the Science Hub
• Final analysis and policy-pointers to inspire
change for more excellent teaching and
learning in the future
https://europa.eu/!JQ76gk
• Teachnical report with 1-page descriptions of
all 30 examples with 6 case studies
https://europa.eu/!fm67Mn
19. Have you come
across PD with
a wow factor?
Contact, comments, questions: Riina.Vuorikari@ec.europa.eu
Editor's Notes
The barriers and Needs are from TALIS study (OECD, 2014)
85% of teachers in EU participated in PD activities in the 12 months prior to the survey (according to the last TALIS study, looking at the data for those EU countries that participated =17 countries + two regions).
Our study is descriptive and the 30 examples were chosen not because they are the best of all available ones, but because they exemplify well these new emergent features at a general level.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., Gardner, M.: Effective Teacher Professional Development. Learning Policy Institute, Palo Alto, CA (2017).
The authors define effective professional development "as structured professional learning that results in changes in teacher practices and improvements in student learning outcomes." After a review of 35 methodologically rigorous studies, the authors outlined seven features most of which effective professional learning seem to incorporate. In the final study, we analyse our cases using this framework.
A swedish example of PD for Math teachers with a participation rate of some 75% at the nation wide (Subject-specific PD through content modules, collegial learning and peer tutoring): https://larportalen.skolverket.se/#/moduler/1-matematik/alla/L%C3%A4rare%20i%20matematik
NL: LeerKRACHT in NL (750 schools participating ): https://stichting-leerkracht.nl/
Belgium (Fr): Prof’Essorhttp://enseignement.catholique.be/segec/index.php?id=2239
This module focuses on the importance of reflection on how you in the teacher group can develop a professional approach to teaching algebra in grades 4-6.
The module is divided into eight parts which deal with a number of didactic perspectives in mathematics teaching. The headings on the sections give a brief summary of the didactic perspective which is the main focus in each part. The module has been supplemented with two texts that deal with programming, these are found in part 5 and part 7. These texts and activities can be read and performed independently from the other contents of the part.
The examples are presented in Table 2
(1) how the delivery is conducted (online; onsite in school, out of school);
(2) the type of PD using an enriched TALIS vocabulary (e.g. courses/workshops, conferences or seminars, observation visits to other schools, qualification programme, participation in a network of teachers; individual or collaborative research, mentoring and/or peer observation and coaching, and school based collaborative PD),
(3) education and training provider ranging from national/regional educational authorities to non-profits, corporate providers or even individuals and new educational entrepreneurs in the field,
(4) whether the focus is on individual teacher or school, for example. Last, the wide range of content areas becomes evident from the titles
(5) addressing the issue of teachers’ PD needs (Table 1, rightmost row).
Cyprus: Teacher PD course to train students to train others https://youngcoaches.pi.ac.cy/
Oxfam: Students peer-mentoring fellow students of migrant background http://edu.oxfam.it/erasmusplus/portfolio-view/intercultural-mentoring
Finland: Innokas network - a schook-based maker-space as a way to robotics http://innokas.fi
Finland: PopUp School https://www.popupkoulu.fi/
Croatia, New content and new delivery of teacher professional development: http://www.azoo.hr/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1999&Itemid=343
Portugal, in-serve training course for mentoring student https://www.psi.uminho.pt/pt/_layouts/15/uminho.portaisuoei.ui/pages/eventsdetail.aspx?id=50313
Spain, Intef: http://aprende.intef.es/
Teaching Channel https://www.teachingchannel.org/
Small chunks and online content for busy teachers:
15. Spain: Online learning opportunities from nano-units to MOOCs http://aprende.intef.es/
16. US: Video as a tool to peer-observation (Teaching Channel) https://www.teachingchannel.org/teachers
(Teacher-entrepreneurs) Estonia-Finland: Cross-border PD course for system-level innovation in education: https://www.euneoscourses.eu/?p=147
Shadow a Student- challenge http://shadowastudent.org/
France, “Creathon” and “Hackathon in eTwinning” https://www.reseau-canope.fr/notice/le-hackathon-pedagogique.html
France, Escape rooms: http://eduscol.education.fr/jeu-numerique/article/2238
Examples of degree programmes in tertiary education (a cohesive whole of course components, aimed at achieving clearly defined exit qualifications).
Finland: post-graduate programmes for “Digi”-teacher http://www.uef.fi/web/ erikoistumiskoulutus-digiope/
Spain: Laboratory for new education http://master.fundacionginer.org/modulo.html
Czech Republic: Live teacher - a training course for future teachers https://www.ucitelnazivo.cz/en/
DK: “Practical Entrepreneurship” course for VET teachers http://www.ffe-ye.dk/undervisning/efteruddannelser/indsats-for-efteruddannelse/projekt-fagligt-entreprenoerskab-eud
Examples about social partners:
Slovakia (with British Council): EnglishOne, a wide-range of resources and support for teaching https://anglictina.iedu.sk/
Italy, Golinelli fundation (accredited CPD courses in STEM by a philanthropist) http://www.fondazionegolinelli.com/the-six-project-areas/
Belgium (Fl): FYXXLAB - an educational out of school, onsite in school makerspace open to all schools https://www.fyxxi.be/
Finland: Schools as local PD providers https://www.oph.fi/kehittamishankkeet/kehittamiskouluverkosto/aineistoa
Thinking outside the box:
Finland: swapping schools to experiment with phenomenon-based learning https://www.sitra.fi/blogit/opettajat-koulutuksessa-nappikaupasta-rohkeisiin-ratkaisuihin/
The more traditional CPD, as provided by education authorities, also sees some innovation: MOOCs, micro-learning, and social media and network exists – but they are only rarely accredited for in-service training.
Provision by the 3rd party actors expands to topics that teachers say they have a need of - but is rarely accredited