2. INTRODUCTION
The study model provides a three dimensional view of the
maxillary and mandibular dental arches in all three planes
of space, i.e., sagittal, vertical and transverse planes.
3. Advantages
1. They are three dimensional records of the patients
dentition.
2. Occlusion can be visualized from lingual aspect.
3. They provide a permanent record of the
intermaxillary relationship.
4. Helps to motivate the patients as they can visualize
the treatment progress.
5. They are needed for comparison purposes at the
end of the treatment and act as a reference for post
treatment changes.
6. They serve as a reminder for the parent and the
patient of the condition present at the start of the
treatment.
7. In case the patient has to be transferred to another
clinician study model are an important record.
4. PARTS OF A STUDY MODEL
Anatomic Portion - Consists of the actual impressions of
the dental arch & its surrounding structures.
Artistic Portion - Consists of the plaster base that
supports the anatomic portion and helps in analysing
the occlusion & orientation of the study models.
The ratio of the anatomic portion to the artistic portion
should be 3:1.
5.
6. REQUSITES OF STUDY MODELS
Should accurately reproduce all the teeth and soft tissues
without any distortion.
Should be trimmed symmetrical on either side.
Posterior surface should be trimmed, such that when
placed on their back they should reproduce the occlusal
plane.
Should reproduce the alveolar process as much as
possible.
7. According to ABO (1990) Guidelines
Lateral view of the study model
1. Base of the maxillary cast is trimmed parallel to the occlusal
plane.
2. Upper & lower cast base should be parallel.
13. DEFINITIONS
Buccoversion when the tooth is displaced bodily in a labial or
buccal direction
Linguoversion when entire tooth is displaced in a lingual or
palatal direction
Infraversion tooth that has not erupted enough in comparison
to adjacent teeth
Supraversion tooth that has over-erupted
Torsiversion rotated tooth or tooth movements around its long
axis
Transposition when two teeth have exchanged their positions
22. ARCH PERIMETER ANALYSIS
Tooth Material and Arch Length Discrepancy
(ALD)
Many malocclusions occur due to discrepancy
between arch length & tooth material
It is done in the upper arch
Two measurements are required for intra-
maxillary analysis of space requirement:
1. Calculation of space required
2. Calculation of space available
Arch perimeter is the geometrical dental arc
formed by teeth at their incisal / cuspal edges
23. PROCEDURE
DETERMINATION OF SPACE REQUIRED:
Measure the mesiodistal dimension of all the teeth mesial to the first
molar (54321│12345)
DETERMINATION OF SPACE AVAILABLE:
1. Measure the arch perimeter using brass wire. From
mesiobuccal line angle of maxillary right first molar , pass
the wire along the buccal cusp and incisal edges in the
anterior region, ‘pass the wire on the left quadrant like a
mirror image till the mesiobuccal line angle of the left
maxillary first molar.
2. Mark the wire and measure the wire, which gives the
space available.
24. In case of proclined incisors, pass the brass wire in the
cingulum region, and if the anterior teeth are retroclined,
pass the wire labial to them like a smooth curve.
26. DETERMINATION OF THE
DISCREPANCY
The difference between the space required and space
available gives the arch discrepancy or excess.
If the tooth material is more than the arch length, the
space available for alignment is not sufficient results in
crowding.
If the tooth material is less than the space then there can
be spacing.
27. CAREY’S ANALYSIS
The arch length-tooth material discrepancy is the main
cause for most malocclusions.
This discrepancy can be calculated with the help of Carey’s
analysis.
The analysis is carried out in the lower arch.
28. INTERPRETATION OF ARCH
PERIMETER ANALYSIS
ARCH LENGTH DISCREPANCY
ALD INFERENCE
0 to 4 mm
Proximal stripping can be carried out
to reduce the minimal tooth material
excess
Avoid extractions
4 to 8 mm
Patient can be treated with or without
extractions depending on lip
procumbency and other factors
Greater than 8mm
Extraction of teeth usually first
premolar might be required
29. PONT’S ANALYSIS FOR ARCH
WIDTH
Pont in 1909, proposed a method of determining the
ideal dental arch width in premolar and first molar
area based on the sum total of mesio-distal widths of
maxillary incisors
Pont suggested that :
The ratio of the combined upper incisor width to
transverse arch width was ideally 0.80 in the premolar
area and 0.64 in the molar area.
30. PONT’S ANALYSIS HELPS IN
Determining whether the dental arch is narrow or is
normal in the premolar and molar region for a given sum
of widths of incisors.
Determining the need for lateral arch expansion.
Determining how much expansion is possible at the
premolar and molar regions.
31. ANALYSIS
DETERMINATION OF SUM OF INCISORS (SI)
DETERMINATION OF MEASURED
PREMOLAR VALUE (MPV)
DETERMINATION OF MEASURED
MOLAR VALUE (MMV):
32. INFERENCE
If the measured value is less than the calculated value,
then the arch is narrow for the given sum of incisors width
and expansion can be done.
If the measured value is greater than the calculated value,
the arch is wider and there is no scope for expansion.
33. CALCULATED PREMOLAR VALUE (CPV): or the expected arch
width in the premolar region is determined by:
CPV = SI X 100
80
CALCULATED MOLAR VALUE (CMV): or expected arch width in
the molar region is determined by:
CMV = SI X 100
64
Patient A:
SI = 40mm
CPV = 50 Measured Inter-premolar width = 42mm
CMV = 62.5 Measured Intermolar width = 50mm
Patient B:
SI = 30mm
CPV = 37.5 Measured Inter-premolar width = 40mm
CMV = 46.8 Measured Intermolar width = 48mm
34. DRAWBACKS
Maxillary laterals are the teeth most commonly missing
from the oral cavity.
Peg-shaped laterals can be seen.
The analysis was done from the casts of French population
It does not take skeletal mal-relationships into
consideration.
35. LINDER HARTH ANALYSIS
Linder Harth proposed an index very similar to
that of Pont’s analysis.
He made variation in the formula to determine
the calculated premolar and molar values
The calculated premolar value (CPV):
CPV = SI X 100
85
The calculated molar value (CMV):
CMV = SI X 100
64
36. BOLTON’S ANALYSIS
Wayne Bolton considered the ratio of the tooth material of
the maxillary arch to the mandibular arch i.e. M-D widths
of upper & lower teeth by nature have predetermined
proportions to maintain normal occlusal relationship.
An alteration in this balance will lead to improper
intercuspation, overjet or spacing
37.
38. Measurements
Sum of maxillary 12
Sum of mandibular 12
Sum of maxillary 6
Sum of mandibular 6
Overall ratio
Anterior ratio
39. Overall Ratio = Sum of mandibular 12 x 100
Sum of maxillary 12
For establishing ideal overjet & overbite overall ratio should be
91.3%
If the overall ratio is less than 91.3%, it indicates maxillary
tooth material excess.
The amount of maxillary tooth material excess is determined
by using the formula
The amount of mandibular tooth excess is determined by:
Determining Overall Ratio
40. The sum of M-D widths of the mandibular anteriors to the
M-D width of the max. anteriors should be 77.2%
The anterior ratio is determined using the following
formula:
If < 77.2 , maxillary anterior excess
If >77.2 , mandibular anterior excess
Determination of Anterior Ratio :
41. Disadvantages of Bolton’s
Analysis
Does not take into account the sexual dimorphism in the
maxillary canine widths.
Study done on specific population.
42. BOLTONS ANALYSIS
Ideal Value for Overall Ratio = 91.3%
Ideal Value for Anterior Ratio = 77.2%
Patient A
Overall Ratio = 94%
Patient B
Anterior Ratio = 81%
Patient C
Overall Ratio = 88%
Patient D
Anterior Ratio = Sum of Mand 6/ Sum of Max 6 = 38/45 =
44. AIM
Methods of analysis of archlength during mixed
dentition
i. Those in which the sizes of unerupted cuspids and
premolars are estimated from radiographic images
ii. Those in which the sizes of cuspids & premolars are
derived from the knowledge of already erupted
permanent tooth in the mouth.(Probability Tables)
iii. Combination of the above two method
45. HUCKABA’S MIXED DENTITION
ANALYSIS (RADIOGRAPHIC METHOD)
This analysis makes use of a radiograph and study cast to
determine the width of unerupted teeth.
Advantages: Easy, practical & relatively accurate.
Disadvantage: Chances of distortion of radiographic image.
46. PRINCIPLE
It is based on the principle that if we measure an
object, which can be seen both in radiograph as well
as on a cast, then we can compensate for the
enlargement of the radiographic image
A simple proportional relationship can be established
as follows:
47. SPACE AVAILABLE: the arch is
divided into segments which are
approximately straight lines. The
dimensions in each of the
segments is measured and
added up.
SPACE REQUIRED: for the un-
erupted teeth is calculated from
the radiographs. The
discrepancy is calculated
segment wise
48. MOYER’S MIXED DENTITION
ANALYSIS
It is based on the premise that there is a reasonably
good correlation b/w the size of erupted permanent
incisors and the unerupted canines & premolars
This is because a person with large teeth in one part of
the mouth will have large teeth elsewhere also, as their
development is controlled by the same genetic
mechanism.
Here the lower permanent incisors are measured and the
mesio-distal widths of unerupted permanent upper and
lower canines and premolars is derived from the
probability chart.
The mandibular incisors are chosen for measuring as they
are the first teeth to erupt in the mixed dentition period.
49. PROCEDURE
SPACE REQUIRED- measure the mesio-distal dimension
of all four lower incisors and sum it up. Using the Moyer’s
probability chart find the total mesio-distal width of upper
and lower canine and premolars from the upper and lower
charts at 75% probability for the given lower incisor
dimension.
50.
51. TANAKA AND JOHNSTON
ANALYSIS (1974)
They developed a method to predict the width of un-erupted
canine and premolar using the width of lower incisors.
This methods has good accuracy despite a small bias towards over-
estimating the un-erupted tooth size.
They have simplified Moyer’s 75% prediction table into a formulas
Predicted width of maxillary canine & premolars / quadrant=
Sum Of Mandibular Incisors/2 +11
Predicted width of mandibular canine & premolars / Quadrant
Sum of Mandibular Incisors + 10.5
2
52. Predicted width of maxillary canine & premolars / quadrant=
Sum Of Mandibular Incisors/2 +11
Predicted width of mandibular canine & premolars / Quadrant
Sum of Mandibular Incisors + 10.5
2
Patient A
Sum of Mandibular Incisors = 24mm
Predicted width of maxillary canine & premolars?
Predicted width of maxillary canine & premolars?
Patient B
Sum of Mandibular Incisors = 19mm
Predicted width of maxillary canine & premolars?
Predicted width of maxillary canine & premolars?
55. ADVANTAGES OF
COMPUTERIZED ANALYSIS
More Accurate
Easy
More information:
Arch form
Determine asymmetric Arch
Space analysis
Rotation
Prediction
57. Group A
Define Anchorage Burn.
Give methods to reinforce anchorage in
Class III cases.
What is Becker’s method of reinforcing
anchorage?
Group C
Define Anchorage Loss.
Give methods to reinforce anchorage in
Class II cases.
What is Begg’s method of preserving
anchorage?
Group B
Define Critical Anchorage.
What are different anchorage types?
What is Tweed’s method of reinforcing anchorage?