Compare and contrast the cognitive interventions presented in your articles.docx
1. Compare and contrast the cognitive interventions presented in your
articles
Milestone One Cognitive• Create an annotated bibliography entry for the primary source
provided. Sources should be described in your own words for a general audience. Your
entry should include a summary of the following:o The problem addressedo The
methodology, measurements, and sampleo The findingso Conclusions and limitations of the
research designMnemonic strategy training improves memory for object location
associations in both healthy elderly and patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment:
A randomized, single-blind study.• Create an annotated bibliography entry for the primary
source of your choice. Sources should be described in your own words for a general
audience. Your entry should include a summary of the following:o The problem addressedo
The methodology, measurements, and sampleo The findingso Conclusions and limitations of
the research designAdaptive working memory strategy training in early Alzheimer’s
disease: Randomized controlled trial• Compare and contrast the cognitive interventions
presented in your articles (at least one intervention per article) and explain why you think
they would be effective. Include the following in your comparison:o The respective
strengths of each interventiono How the articles address your target population. If they do
not, what would need to be modified in the intervention?[Insert
text.]ReferencesHampstead, B. M., Sathian, K., Phillips, P. A., Amaraneni, A., Delaune, W. R., &
Stringer, A. Y. (2012). Mnemonic strategy training improves memory for object location
associations in both healthy elderly and patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment:
A randomized, single-blind study. Neuropsychology, 26(3), 385–399. https://doi-
org.ezproxy.snhu.edu/10.1037/a0027545Huntley, J., Hampshire, A., Bor, D., Owen, A., &
Howard, R. (2017). Adaptive working memory strategy training in early Alzheimer’s
disease: Randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 210(1), 61-66.
doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.116.182048