SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  49
2009 figures
economic, social, societal
and environmental data
Sustainable development is the keystone of AREVA’s industrial strategy.
In 2002, the group created its AREVA Way sustainable development
initiative, which revolves around ten main commitments.
These commitments are an integral part of the group’s management
system, including the strategic action plan, the budget and the reporting
process. They apply to all AREVA entities.
AREVA Way is at once a state of mind, a goal and a way of acting
specific to AREVA:
– a way to be: attitudes and behaviors conducive to achieving
  these goals;
– a way to go: a target balanced on the three pillars of sustainable
  development – economic, social and environmental – and broken
  down into 10 AREVA commitments;
– a way to act planning and sharing performance improvement goals,
  performance objectives and action plans to achieve this target.
It is a process of continuous improvement that works in conjunction with
AREVA’s implementation of its ten commitments. AREVA Way drives the
group’s sustainable development performance.
The Report on Responsible Growth reviews our actions and our overall
performance. The figures published in this supplement are the tangible
results of the actions taken.
NOTE: Unless otherwise explicitly indicated or specifically
mentioned, all of the figures presented in this document include
the Nuclear, Renewables and Transmission & Distribution*
operations.



                 *Operations held for sale in 2009 and discontinued on June 7, 2010
Contents
    PERFORMANCE                                       ENVIRONMENT
    IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE                            20   Water*
     01   Continuous Improvement*                     21   Energy*
     03   Innovation                                  22   Gaseous releases*
                                                      24   Liquid releases
                                                      25   Conventional waste*
    FINANCIAL                                         26   Radioactive waste
    PERFORMANCE
     04   2009 results
                                                      APPENDICES
    COMMITMENT                                        30   Reporting methodology
    TO EMPLOYEES                                      32   Auditors’ report
                                                      35   Social indicators
     07   Stakeholder relations
                                                      37   Environmental indicators
     10   Occupational safety*
                                                      40   Deployment of our sustainable
     12   Health
                                                           development initiative
     13   Health and working conditions
     14   Radiation protection*
     15   Radiological impacts
     16   Technological risks
     17   Employees
     18   Personnel and training
     19   Workforce and diversity*


  * 2009 indicators verified onsite by the auditors
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE
                         CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT


                           NUMBER OF AREVA WAY                                                                             AREVA Way is the backbone of the group’s continuous improvement
                           SELF-ASSESSMENTS COMPLETED                                                                      initiative. It is based on standards that enable every entity to assess its
                           ■ Sites and Business Units                                                                      performance in terms of our 10 sustainable development commitments
                           ■ Corporate                                                                                     and thus to set objectives that contribute to its own and to the group’s
                                                                                                                           performance improvement.
                           “Corporate” refers to the functional
                           departments, which performed separate                                                           For each commitment, areas for improvement are themselves broken
                           self-assessments.                                                                               down into 121 performance improvement criteria.
                                                                               212                    214                  The group’s entities assess their practices and actual performance for
                                                           201
                                                                                                                           each of these criteria on a scale of 1 to 4.
                                                                                                                           The four assessment levels correspond to varying stages of
                                                                                                                           performance improvement: launched, deployed, mature and excellent.
                                                                                                                           This progression is indicative of a growing command of methodologies,
                                                                                                                           a widening scope of coverage, increasing stakeholder involvement and
                                                                                                                           ultimately better performance.
                                                   44                   46
                                                                                                15                         In 2009, due to the group’s reorganization, fewer self-assessments were
                                                                                                                           performed at the corporate level.
                                                    2007                     2008                    2009


                           SCORE BREAKDOWN
                           (in % of total operating entities)
                           ■ Criterion not applicable
                           ■ Level 1                             4%                  4 .2%                    5%
                           ■ Level 2
                           ■ Level 3                            33%                  37%                     43%
                           ■ Level 4



                                                                45%                  40%                    37.1%

                                                                17%                 16.3%                    13%
                                                                 2%                  2.4%                     2%
                                                                      2007                   2008                   2009


1 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE
                         CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT


                           NUMBER OF CERTIFICATIONS                                                                      As part of its sustainable development initiative, AREVA’s policies
                           RECEIVED BY GROUP ENTITIES IN 2009                                                            include the establishment of management systems to meet quality,
                                                                                                                         environmental and safety goals.
                                                                                                                         The entities – whether plants, administrative sites or commercial
                                                                                                                         sites – must work towards integrating the different management
                                   146                                        299
                                                                                                                         systems to ensure consistent leadership and focus resources on
                                                                                                                         priority objectives.
                                                                                                                         What is known as “integrated certification” can cover several fields
                                   116                                 267          ■ ISO 9001                           as well as several sites, several operations, or even several legal
                                                                                    ■ OHSAS 18001                        entities. By expanding the scope, interfaces are more easily
                                                                                    ■ ISO 14001                          managed.
                                   99                           235                 ■ T&D share




                           NUMBER OF MULTIPLE CERTIFICATIONS
                           RECEIVED BY GROUP ENTITIES
                                                                              75                                         The integration of management systems continued in 2009. The
                              69
                                               63                                                                        number of entities with three certifications increased by more than
                                                                      57
                                                                                                                         90% in one year, with the number of ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001
                                                     39
                                                                                                                         certificates rising by 20% and 30% respectively.

                                        22                                          ■ Dual certification (9001+18001 /
                                                                                      9001 +14001 / 14001+18001)
                                                                                    ■ Triple certification
                                                                                      (9001+18001+14001)
                                2007             2008                  2009




2 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE
                         INNOVATION


                           R&D EXPENSES                                   NUMBER OF PATENT           The group’s research and development expenses increased in the
                           (in millions of euros)                         APPLICATIONS               Nuclear, Renewable Energies and Transmission & Distribution
                                                     521
                                                                                                     businesses. R&D expenses totaled 521 million euros in 2009, or 3.7%
                                           453
                              421                                                      149    168    of contributions to revenue, compared with 453 million euros and
                                                                                                     3.5% of revenue in 2008.
                                                                          120
                                                                                                     Taking into account all costs incurred for research and development,
                                                                                                     the group’s total R&D expenditure was 1.013 billion euros in 2009, or
                                                                                                     7.2% of revenue for the period, down 11.2% compared with 2008.
                                                    3.7%                                             The change in total R&D expenditure between the two periods reflects
                             3.5%         3.5%                                                       continued heavy growth in long-term project expenses, in line with the
                                                             in %
                                                                                                     group’s strategic objectives, including:
                                                             of revenue
                                                                                                     • development and modernization of production capabilities in the
                             2007         2008      2009                  2007         2008   2009
                                                                                                       front end of the cycle;
                                                                                                     • additions to the light water reactor line, and in particular the
                                                                                                       ATMEA1™ pressurized water reactor and the KERENA™ boiling
                           CONTRIBUTION TO R&D EXPENSES                                                water reactor;
                           (in % of revenue)
                                                                                                     • development of fast neutron reactors;
                                                                                                     • performance improvement of equipment;
                                                    3.7                          4.1
                                                                                                     • preliminary design of future treatment and recycling plants;
                                                                                                     • reinvigoration of expertise; and
                                                                                 3.2                 • synthetic oils and hydrogen.
                                                    2.9

                             ■ NUCLEAR
                             ■ T&D                    2008                  2009




3 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
                         2009 RESULTS

                         CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
                         Nuclear and Renewables operations –                              Revenue growth
                         excluding T&D (millions of euros)               2009     2008    Revenue from the Nuclear and Renewable Energies businesses was stable in France
                                                                                          compared with 2008.
                         Reported revenue                                8,529   8,089    International sales were up 9.3% in relation to 2008 to 5.264 billion euros, or 62%
                                                                                          of revenue.
                         Operating income                                  97    (143)
                                                                                          Foreign exchange had a positive impact of 67 million euros. Changes in consolidation scope
                         Percentage of reported revenue                  1.1%    (1.8%)   had a negligible impact.
                         Net financial income                             187        6
                                                                                          Backlog growth of 1.8%
                         Share in net income of associates               (152)     156    The backlog for the Nuclear and Renewables businesses came to 43.3 billion euros at
                         Income taxes                                     138      109    December 31, 2009, for an increase of 1.8% in relation to year-end 2008.
                                                                                          In the Nuclear business, new orders came to about 9.5 billion euros, confirming the strength
                         Net income from discontinued operations          267      371    of the installed base business.
                         Net income attributable to minority interests    (15)     (91)   In Renewable Energies, the group signed a contract valued at more than 800 million euros
                                                                                          in the offshore wind market, bringing the value of the backlog to more than 1 billion euros at
                         Net income attributable to owners                552      589
                                                                                          December 31, 2009.
                         of the parent
                                                                                          Net income attributable to owners of the parent: 552 million euros
                                                                                          Net income attributable to owners of the parent totaled 552 million euros in 2009,
                                                                                          compared with 589 million euros in 2008.
                                                                                          The change is chiefly due to the drop in net income from associates and from
                                                                                          discontinued operations, offset by the improvement in operating income and financial
                                                                                          income.
                                                                                          Net earnings per share came to 15.59 euros in 2009, compared with 16.62 euros in 2008.




4 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
                         2009 RESULTS

                         CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEE                                                Consolidated balance sheet
                         Nuclear and Renewables operations -                                      The assets and liabilities of operations held for sale in 2009, and subsequently discontinued
                         excluding T&D (millions of euros)              2009          2008*       on June 7, 2010, are reported under separate headings of the group’s balance sheet at
                         ASSETS                                                                   December 31, 2009, unadjusted for previous periods, excluding the receivables and liabilities
                                                                                                  that those operations had with other entities of the group, which continue to be eliminated in
                         Goodwill nets                                  4,366         4,803       accordance with IAS 27.
                         Property, plant and equipment                  8,576         8,002       For this reason, the net value of assets and liabilities of discontinued operations reported on
                         and intangible assets                                                    the balance sheet at December 31, 2009 is not representative of AREVA T&D equity at that
                                                                                                  date.
                         End-of-life-cycle asset (third party share)     275             270
                         Financial assets earmarked                     5,351         4,954       A stronger balance sheet
                         for end-of-life-cycle obligations                                        Based on the 2007 valuation of the debt to Siemens (2.049 billion euros, plus accrued
                                                                                                  interest), the group’s net debt comes to 6.193 billion euros at December 31, 2009, compared
                         Investments in associates                      1,635         1,757
                                                                                                  with 5.499 billion euros at December 31, 2008.
                         Other non-current fi nancial assets             860          2,152       The increase is chiefly attributable to the impact of negative free operating cash flow, the
                         Deferred taxes (assets – liabilities)           150             140      payment of dividends and the increase in the net debt of the T&D business (which was held
                                                                                                  for sale in 2009 and discontinued on June 7, 2007), offset by the cash generated by the sale
                         Working capital requirement (WCR)               (62)            656      of equity interests in GDF-Suez and Total.
                         Net assets from operations                     5,649               -     On a pro forma basis (including net cash to be received from the sale of T&D), the group’s
                         held for sale                                                            net debt stood at 3.022 billion euros.
                                                                                                  These amounts should be compared with equity of 7.574 billion at December 31, 2009
                         LIABILITIES
                                                                                                  (including 990 million euros in equity contribution from the T&D division before elimination
                         Equity                                         6,648         6,547       of the shares), compared with 7.292 billion at year-end 2008.
                                                                                                  In addition, the group’s liquidity was strengthened in 2009 as the result of a 3-billion euro
                         Minority interests                              926             745
                                                                                                  bond issue, which brought debt maturity into line with asset maturity and freed up available
                         Provisions for end-of-life-cycle                275             270      back-up lines of credit in an amount of some 3 billion euros.
                         obligations – third party share
                         Provisions for end-of-life-cycle               5,385         5,404
                         obligations – AREVA share
                         Other current and                              2,911         3,472
                         non-current provisions
                         Borrowings                                     6,193         5,499
                         Liabilities of operations held for sale        3,685               -
                         Other assets and liabilities                    777             797
                         Summary balance sheet total                   26,800        22,734
                                                                                * including T&D
5 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
                         2009 RESULTS

                         CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
                         Nuclear and Renewables operations -                                            Free operating cash flow before tax of -919 million euros
                         excluding T&D (millions of euros)                            2009      2008    Pre-tax free operating cash flow generated by the Nuclear and Renewables
                                                                                                        businesses in 2009 was stable at -919 million euros, compared with
                         EBITDA                                                        584       593
                                                                                                        -900 million euros in 2008.
                         Percentage of reported revenue                               6.8%      7.3%    The favorable change in working capital requirement offset the net increase
                         Net gain on the sale of non-current operating assets and      314       190    in capital expenditures.
                         other non-cash items                                                           Over the year, the impact of negative free operating cash flow in the amount
                                                                                                        of 919 million euros attributable to operating Capex was offset by cash
                         Change in operating WCR                                       105      (173)
                                                                                                        generated by the sale of equity interests in GDF-Suez and Total totaling
                         Net operating Capex                                        (1,294)   (1,130)   1.01 billion euros.
                         Free operating cash-flow before tax                         (919)     (900)
                         End-of-life-cycle obligations                                (124)     (115)
                         Dividends paid by AREVA                                      (309)     (315)
                         Change in net debt from discontinued operations              (351)     (177)
                         Other (taxes, dividends from associates, etc.)              1,099        11
                         Change in net cash (debt)                                     694    (1,496)
                         Net cash (debt)                                            (6,193)   (5,499)




6 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES
                         STAKEHOLDER RELATIONS – Nuclear and Renewables operations – excluding T&D


                                                                                                           (1) This is not an accounting consolidation.
                                                        CUSTOMERS
                                                        REVENUE
                                                        €8.529BN                                           (2) To plan for the decommissioning of nuclear facilities as soon
                                                                                                           as they are brought on line, AREVA estimated its share of costs
                                                                                                           and constituted a portfolio to cover them. The earmarked portfolio
                                                                                                           is based on conservative assumptions regarding annual yield and
                                                                                                           how expenses are staggered.


                                                                                                           Provisions for end-of-life-cycle operations totaled 5.66 billion
                                                                                                           euros at December 31, 2009, of which 275 million euros are to
                                                                                                           be funded by third parties, with AREVA funding the remaining
                             SUMS                                   SUMS USED TO                           5.385 million euros.
                             REDISTRIBUTED                          ENSURE BUSINESS
                             TO THE STAKEHOLDERS                    CONTINUITY
                            Banks and financial institutions        Year-end 2008 total of AREVA’s
                            Interest expense                        share of provisions for end-of-life-
                            €113m                                   cycle obligations
                                                                    €5.385bn(2)
                            Shareholders
                            Dividends paid                          Year-end 2009 total
                            €309m                                   of provisions for retirement
                                                                    €1.121bn
                            Suppliers
                            Purchases of goods and services         Net investment in property,
                            €3.5bn                                  plant and equipment and in
                                                                    intangible assets
                            Employees                               €1.294bn
                            Payroll expenses
                            €3.353m                                 Research and development
                                                                    €815.6m
                            Public agencies
                            Income tax
                            €51m
                            Société civile (including T&D)
                            €18m(1)

7 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES
                         STAKEHOLDER RELATIONS – Nuclear and Renewables operations – excluding T&D


                            PERCENTAGE OF REVENUE INCREASE ACHIEVED IN   The French government has defined a “protected sector” encompassing special work sites and
                            PURCHASES OF SERVICES FROM THE PROTECTED     support services, which together create an environment that makes it possible for people with
                            SECTOR (in %)
                                                                         severe disabilities to work. AREVA’s protected sector program is headed up by the Purchasing
                                                                         department, which sets performance objectives for each site and measures progress.
                                                       0.67              The program focuses on efforts to create more national framework agreements, expanded actions
                                                                         at the sites in priority segments (green spaces, building services and small repairs, photocopying
                                             0.56                        and printing, disassembly of computer equipment, etc.), and optimization of tools provided by our
                                                                         national partners (marketplaces, database access, distribution of handbooks, etc.).
                                    0.45                                 The purchasing department draws on a network of purchasing champions charged with deploying
                                                                         the program for the protected sector.
                                                                         The year 2009 confirmed the mobilization of buyers, for whom turning to the protected sector in
                                                                         setting up new requests for proposals is now a reflex and part of their daily work.
                                                                         Purchases from companies in the protected sector rose yet again, from 1.5 million euros to
                                                                         5.3 million euros, an increase of nearly 30%.
                                                                         This figure corresponds to some 245 full-time jobs for people with disabilities.
                                                                         Examples of achievements and best practices:
                                   2007      2008      2009              • Mail sorting and distribution at the AREVA Marcoule site is carried out by a company in the
                                                                           protected sector.
                                                                         • Locker room facilities at the MELOX plant are managed by AGK, a group of companies dedicated
                                                                           to hiring protected sector employees.
                                                                         • APOSIT, a company dedicated to hiring protected sector employees, manages document
                                                                           reproduction and data storage projects at the AREVA Tower.




8 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES
                         STAKEHOLDER RELATIONS – Nuclear and Renewables operations – excluding T&D

                         AREVADELFI PERFORMANCE*                                         2009    In 2009, the DRDEL continued its efforts to promote employment in industrial projects in France
                         Committee meetings                                                  3   in regions where the AREVA group operates and near the future Bure waste disposal center in
                                                                                                 the Meuse/Haute-Marne area.
                         Applications approved                                              11
                                                                                                 In 2009, and in areas in which we are based:
                         Commitments authorized (in millions of euros)                   1.331   • 80 projects were underway;
                                                                                                 • 11 projects were approved by the commitment committee.
                         Number of jobs supported                                         265
                                                                                                 Together, they represent 265 direct jobs over a three-year period and a commitment of
                         Commitments made (in millions of euros)                       14.067    1.3 million euros.

                         Jobs created or in the process of creation over a 3-year                With regard to business parks:
                                                                                         3,915
                         period                                                                  • The 90,000 m2 Harfleur 2000 Enterprise Village, which is 99% rented, represents more
                                                                                                   than 800 jobs at the Harfleur and Chanliau sites, and the creation of annex sites is under
                         *development capital company created by the group to promote economic     consideration.
                         development in countries in which it operates.                          • The first phase of construction of 7,500 m2 was completed at the Saint-Dizier park, and
                                                                                                   3,500 m2 are already rented. The longer term objective is a second phase of construction
                                                                                                   and the creation of some 100 jobs.
                                                                                                 • Rehabilitation work continues at the 5,000 m2 Chalon-sur-Saône sugar mill, to be delivered in
                                                                                                   mid-2010, with the goal of creating 150 jobs in 2010.
                                                                                                 • Several other projects are under review with partners in the countries in which the group
                                                                                                   operates.

                                                                                                 In Niger, the partnership with Sinergi, a risk capital company formed with French and local
                                                                                                 partners, was expanded in 2009 with the creation of an AREVA “fund”, providing seed money
                                                                                                 for the first projects.




9 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES
                          OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY


                            FREQUENCY RATE FOR WORK-                NUMBER OF SITES BY FREQUENCY RATE               AREVA continued to move towards zero accident in 2009
                            RELATED ACCIDENTS WITH LOST             (FR) IN 2009                                    and has already outperformed the objectives set for 2010,
                            TIME FOR AREVA GROUP EMPLOYEES
                                                                     207
                                                                                                                    with a frequency rate of less than 3 and a severity rate of
                            (number of work accidents per million
                            hours worked)                                                                           less than 0.15.

                                                                                                                    The group ended the year with an average frequency rate of
                                                                                                                    2.04, i.e. lower than that of 2008, three times lower than that
                             3.55
                                         3.19                                                                       of 2003 and well below the French industry average of 24.2
                                                                                                                    for 2008 (source: Social Security Administration/CNAMTS-
                                                                                                                    2008).
                                                     2.04
                                                                                                                    The severity rate for work-related accidents of 0.08 is well
                                                                               29                                   below the 1.09 French industry average (source: Social
                                                                                           7                        Security Administration/CNAMTS-2008).
                                                                                                      5        1
                            2007        2008         2009           FR<5     5<FR<10 10<FR<15 15<FR<20      20<FR   Despite these improvements, the group regrets to report two
                                                                                                                    AREVA employee deaths and five subcontractor deaths in
                                                                                                                    2009 as a result of work-related accidents.
                            SEVERITY RATE FOR WORK-RELATED          NUMBER OF SITES BY SEVERITY RATE
                            ACCIDENTS WITH LOST TIME FOR            (SR) IN 2009
                                                                                                                    To achieve its goal of zero accidents, the group continued to
                            AREVA GROUP EMPLOYEES                    226
                            (number of days lost per                                                                provide tools and resources to support personnel,
                            thousand hours worked)                                                                  including:
                                                                                                                    • continued training of safety engineers and managers;
                                                                                                                    • missions to group entities to support them in their
                                                                                                                      performance improvement plans;
                                                                                                                    • meetings to share experience with the group’s major
                                                                                                                      customers concerning safety management at the large
                                                                                                                      construction sites.

                             0.11        0.10
                                                     0.08

                                                                                    15
                                                                                                  4        4
                            2007        2008         2009           SR<0,2    0,2<SR<0,5       0,5<SR<1   1<SR


10 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES
                          OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY


                           Safety is central to the group’s businesses and is one of the criteria used in selecting   To continue to make progress towards an optimum level of performance and to
                           the group’s subcontractors.                                                                improve the effectiveness of its management policy, AREVA draws on a structured
                           AREVA strengthened its subcontractor selection process at the beginning of 2009 by         ”Human and Organizational Factors” initiative in each entity, in collaboration with the
                           implementing a directive on subcontractor occupational safety management.                  safety, environmental, quality and continuous improvement functions.
                           Additional steps were taken, particularly in Asia, where the majority of these accidents
                           occurred, including training and awareness raising in the local language in the areas
                           of health, safety and the environment among subcontractor personnel.




11 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES
                          HEALTH


                           Deployment of the health policy approved by the Executive Committee in 2007             The 2010 program will focus on:
                           continued in 2009. Related activities revolved around the following priorities:         • the construction sites,
                           • Improving occupational health with two directives, one on carcinogenic,               • monitoring subcontractors,
                             mutagenic and reprotoxic substances (CMR) and the other on noise;                     • continued deployment of the policy to prevent psychosocial disorders, and
                           • Implementing public health initiatives:                                               • continued protection against the impact of CMR substances.
                              – continuing the HIV/AIDS prevention program, particularly in Niger;
                              – continuing establishment of health observatories near mine sites in Gabon and
                                Niger, and preliminary studies in Canada and Kazakhstan;
                           • Implementing initiatives to improve the quality of life at work:
                              – promoting employment continuity and equal opportunity for people with
                                disabilities as part of the diversity initiative;
                              – preventing psychosocial disorders, with a first pilot phase focused on listening
                                and support at 16 sites and an evaluation of the quality of life at work at
                                three sites.




                            EMPLOYEES EXAMINED BY A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL DURING THEIR                               In 2009, the rate for the Asian and North American sites was lower than the average
                            RECRUITMENT IN RELATION TO THE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES HIRED
                                                                                                                   for the group (70% and 78% respectively), but higher than in 2008.
                            DURING THE YEAR (in %)
                                                                                                                   For Europe, Africa and South America, the rate was close to 100%.

                                                      98                         99
                                                                   88




                                                    2007          2008         2009




12 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES
                          HEALTH AND WORKING CONDITIONS


                            GROUP SITES THAT HAVE A PUBLIC HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM                             AREVA promotes and participates in public health
                                                                                                                  initiatives such as vaccination programs, stop
                                                                                                                  smoking campaigns, the fight against obesity, etc.
                            WORLD
                                                                                                                  In all, of the 103 sites that have adopted public health
                            41 %                                                                                  improvement initiatives, 49 sites are in France, 9 are
                                                                                                                  in Germany, 5 are in Brazil, 4 are in China and 4 are
                                                                                                                  in India.
                                                                       EUROPE
                                                                                                                  The number of group sites that have set up a public
                                                                       45%                                        health improvement initiative increased in each
                                         NORTH
                                         AMERICA                                                                  region, as sites improved their understanding of the
                                                                                                                  meaning of a public health improvement initiative.
                                         25%                                                               ASIA
                                                                                                           28%

                               SOUTH
                               AMERICA                        AFRICA

                               38%                            53%



                            GROUP SITES THAT HAVE A PROCESS            GROUP SITES THAT HAVE DEVELOPED
                            FOR LISTENING AND PROVIDING                ACTION PLANS FOR INSERTION AND
                            SUPPORT TO THEIR EMPLOYEES                 CONTINUED EMPLOYMENT OF WORKERS
                                                                       WITH A LIMITED CAPACITY FOR WORK*




                                 46%                                             85%
                                                                                                                  *   This performance indicator is limited to the
                                                                                                                      European sites.




13 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES
                          RADIATION PROTECTION – Nuclear operations


                            NUMBER OF                       18,255                                                     Radioactive doses received by AREVA and subcontractor
                            EMPLOYEES EXPOSED                                                                          employees fell in 2009, mostly in the nuclear services business.
                            BY DOSE BRACKET
                            IN 2009                                                                                    The average dose from radiation exposure to AREVA group
                                                                                                                       employees went from 1.19 mSv in 2007 to 1.04 mSv in 2009.
                                                                                                                       Employees in the Mining, Nuclear Services and Clean-up business
                                                                                                                       units are the most exposed.

                                                                                                                       For subcontractor personnel working at AREVA sites, the average
                                                                            3,333                                      radiation exposure is much lower and was declining after remaining
                                                                                                                       flat for a certain amount of time, going from 0.49 mSv in 2007 to
                                                                                           301     0           0
                                                                                                                       0.39 mSv in 2009.
                                                            <2 mSv     2 to 10 mSv 10 to 18 mSv 18 to 20 mSv >20 mSv   Subcontractor personnel exposure was highest in the Mining,
                                                                                                                       Recycling and Nuclear Site Value Development business units.
                             NUMBER OF            14000 13,256
                             SUBCONTRACTOR                                                                             No worker, whether of the AREVA group or of a subcontractor,
                             EMPLOYEES EXPOSED                                                                         received more than the maximum allowable dose of 20 mSv
                             BY DOSE BRACKET      10500
                             IN 2009                                                                                   in 2009.

                                                   7000                                                                The maximum individual dose measured over 12 consecutive
                                                                                                                       months was 16.01 mSv for an AREVA group employee and
                                                   3500                                                                15.99 mSv for a subcontractor employee.
                                                                            900                                        It should be noted that more than 83% of the group’s employees
                                                                                           63      0           0
                                                        0                                                              and 93% of the subcontractor personnel working at AREVA sites
                                                            <2 mSv     2 to 10 mSv 10 to 18 mSv 18 to 20 mSv >20 mSv   received individual doses of less than 2 mSv over 12 consecutive
                                                                                                                       months. For the record, the average annual exposure to naturally
                            AVERAGE RADIATION EXPOSURE OF EMPLOYEES AND SUBCONTRACTORS                                 occurring radiation is around 2.5 mSv in France.
                            (in mSv)

                                                 1.19                1.22
                                                                                    1.04


                                                 0.49                0.50
                                                                                    0.39

                            ■ Employees
                            ■ Subcontractors     2007                2008           2009


14 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES
                          RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT – Nuclear operations


                                                                                                                                                       Inhalation
                                                                                                                                                                           Fallout
                                                                                                                                                                         (aerosols)          A radiological impact assessment is performed for each nuclear site.
                                                                                                                                                                                             This involves monitoring liquid and gaseous releases to the
                                                      Air
                                                                                                                                                                                             environment and analyzing their dispersion in the natural environment
                                                                                                                                                Milk
                                                                                                                                                                                  External
                                                                                                                                                                                             and the pathways by which radioactivity can reach humans: air;
                                                      Gaseous releases
                                                                                                                                                                                             plant or soil sediments; water in the form of drinking water, streams,
                                   Gaseous releases                                                                                                                              exposure
                                                                                                     Watering                                     Ingestion
                                                                                                                              Pasture
                                                                                                                                                                                             rivers, or groundwater bodies; the marine environment through
                                                                                                                                                                                             swimming, water sports, etc.; and foods such as milk, vegetables,
                                                                         Rainfall
                                                                                                                                                  Drinking
                                                                                                                                                  water                                      meat or fish. The analyses take into account the lifestyles of the most
                                                                                                                                                                                             exposed members of the public.
                                        Deposit on                                   Crops
                                        ground

                                 Infiltration                  Stream                                                                                                                         The assessment covers population groups identified as being the
                                                                                                                                                         To drinking
                                                                                                                                                         water                               most exposed locally to the impacts of the releases.

                                           Groundwater                                           Swimming, water sports
                                                                                                                                                                                             Radiological impacts are monitored in accordance with local
                                                                                                                                                                                             regulatory requirements under the strict control of national safety
                                                                                        Liquid
                                                                                        releases                                                                                             authorities. Methods may therefore vary as a function of regulatory
                                                                                                                                                                                             requirements. The radiological impacts of the nuclear sites on the
                                                                                                                                                       Ingestion
                                                                         Sediments
                                                                                                                Shellfish
                                                                                                                                                                                             most exposed members of neighboring populations are represented
                                                                                                                        Fish
                                                                                                                                                                                             by an exposure indicator, the “additional effective dose”, expressed
                                                                                                           Seaweed
                                                                                                                                                                                             in millisieverts per year (mSv/yr).
                                                                                0.009




                                                                                                                                                                                             The nuclear facilities continue to have a very low radiological impact.
                             RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT
                             (in mSv)                                                                                                                                                        There is little change in radiological impact from one year to the next
                                                                                                  0.0075




                                                                                                                                                                                             due to changes in production volumes and/or variations in weather
                                                                                         0.007




                             ■ 2007
                                                                                                                                                                                             conditions. The radiological impact remains well below the regulatory
                             ■ 2008
                                                                                                                                                                                             limit for the general public of 1 mSv per year for the radiological
                             ■ 2009
                                                                                                                                                                                             impact added by nuclear activities, and well below variations in
                                                                                                                     0.0015


                                                                                                                                       0.0008




                                                                                                                                                                             0.0009
                                                                                                                                                           0.0007
                                                                                                                                                                    0.0006




                                                                                                                                                                                             naturally-occurring radioactivity and thus in estimated naturally-
                                                                                                                              0.0005




                                                                                                                                                                                             occurring radioactivity in France, averaging 2.4 mSv per year.

                                                                                La Hague                               Tricastin                             Romans

15 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES
                          TECHNOLOGY RISKS – Nuclear operations


                            NUMBER OF INES EVENTS IN THE NUCLEAR FACILITIES WORLDWIDE,                   Two events were ranked level 2 on the International Nuclear Event
                            INCLUDING THE USA                                                            Scale (INES) in 2009, one at MELOX and one at AREVA NC
                            ■ 2007                                                                       Cadarache (where the CEA is the nuclear operator).
                            ■ 2008
                            ■ 2009                                                                       Both events were initially reported at INES level 1, but were
                                                                                                         classified at level 2 by the French nuclear safety authority ASN.

                                           114                                                           The most recent previous level 2 event occurred three years ago,
                                     111
                                                                                                         in November 2006.

                                                                                                         The level 2 event that occurred at MELOX in March 2009 was
                                                                                                         reported when a technical requirement intended to prevent the risk
                                                                                                         of a criticality was exceeded.

                                                                                                         The Cadarache event occurred in October 2009 when a higher than
                                                                                                         predicted quantity of residual nuclear materials was discovered
                              64                                                                         during glove box dismantling operations. This event led to a partial
                                                                                                         suspension of the dismantling operations.

                                                                                                         Lessons learned concerning the evaluation of residual quantities
                                                                                                         in workstations at facilities operated by AREVA were collected at
                                                                                                         the end of 2009.


                                                        23      21
                                                 17


                                                                                   2
                                                                     0     0             0   0       0
                                   Level 0            Level 1            Level 2         > level 2




16 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES
                          EMPLOYEES


                            WORKFORCE                                                                            The AREVA group had 79,444 employees at year-end
                            ■ Fixed-term                                                                         2009, compared with 75,414 employees at year-end
                              employment contract                             75,414             79,444          2008, an increase of 5.34%. The group hired
                                                     65,583                                             74,039   12,675 employees in 2009.
                            ■ Open-ended                                          69,395
                              employment contract           61,356
                                                                                                                 For the group as a whole, fixed-term employment
                                                                                                                 agreements represent 7.17% of the workforce, including
                                                                                                                 33% (i.e. 1,821 people) hired under school-to-work
                                                                                                                 programs, up 2.47% compared with 2008. Most of the
                                                                                                                 school-to-work program participants are in France (72%),
                                                    4,227                 6,019                 2,599
                                                                                                                 Germany (15%) and India (6.4%).
                                                      2007                    2008                 2009
                                                                                                                 Engineers and managers represented 42% of the workforce
                                                                                                                 in 2009, a two-point increase compared with 2008. Technical
                                                                                                                 and administrative personnel represent 36% of the
                                                                                                                 workforce, for a one point increase compared with 2008.
                            WORKFORCE BY REGION (in %)                                                           Skilled workers represent 22% of the workforce, for a three-
                                                                                                                 point decrease compared with 2008.
                                   ■ Europe
                                   ■ North and South America
                                   ■ Africa and Middle East
                                                                                           68
                                   ■ Asia-Pacific

                                                                     14

                                                                          5
                                                                                  13




17 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES
                          PERSONNEL AND TRAINING


                           NUMBER OF HOURS OF TRAINING          AGE PYRAMID
                           PER EMPLOYEE PER YEAR                ■ 2008
                                                                ■ 2009
                                                  33
                                                         30
                                        28




                                                                                                    10,460




                                                                                                                                                                      10,473



                                                                                                                                                                                       10,006
                                                                                                                                                     10,102

                                                                                                                                                              9,942



                                                                                                                                                                               9,309
                                                                                                                                             9,366
                                                                                                                     9,298



                                                                                                                                     8,733
                                                                                            8,593



                                                                                                             7,860



                                                                                                                             7,934




                                                                                                                                                                                                        6,083
                                                                                                                                                                                                5,383
                                                                                    4,951
                                                                            4,210




                                                                                                                                                                                                                        1,720
                                                                                                                                                                                                                1,389
                                                                      319
                                                                298
                                        2007     2008    2009   <21         21-25           26-30            31-35           36-40           41-45            46-50            51-55             56-60           61-65




18 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES
                          WORKFORCE AND DIVERSITY


                            PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN                                                             Diversity, equal opportunity and non-discrimination are a key component
                            BY EMPLOYMENT CATEGORY                                                          of AREVA’s human resources policy. They are expressed through several
                                                                                        19.6         19.2   major commitments:
                            ■ Executive management                      18.0                     18.4
                            ■ Management                                             18.1                   • gender balance and professional equality between men and women;
                                                                    16.0
                            ■ Skilled/unskilled workers, admi-                                              • social, ethnic and cultural diversity; and
                              nistrative/clerical, technicians,   8.0          9.2             9.0          • employment of the disabled.
                              supervisors
                                                                                                            This policy was evidenced in the activities launched in 2008 that
                                                                                                            were extended in 2009:
                                                                  2007           2008                2009   • Greater diversity in recruitment. In addition to engineers, AREVA decided
                                                                                                              to increase the number of university graduates, undergraduates and
                            PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN                                                               technicians hired in apprenticeship positions and to support their
                            IN NEW HIRES                                                                      migration to engineering positions.
                             21                                                                             • The group held its first European Day of Gender Balance in the
                                          18.74          18.87                                                Workplace, during which AREVA deployed about a hundred awareness
                                                                                                              initiatives at its European sites. The group’s objectives by year-end 2010
                                                                                                              are:
                                                                                                              - a 20% ratio of women in management committees (the rate was 17.52%
                                                                                                                in Europe in 2009);
                                                                                                              - priority consideration of career opportunities for women during people
                            2007          2008           2009                                                   reviews using the same criteria as those used to evaluate men.
                                                                                                            • The group pays close attention to career opportunities for new hires with
                                                                                                              diverse social, ethnic and cultural backgrounds.
                            PERCENTAGE OF DISABLED PERSONS                                                  • Employment of the disabled. The group has achieved significant
                            IN HIRED FOR PERMANENT POSITIONS                                                  progress in this area since 2006. The employment rate for people with
                                                                                                              disabilities was 3.44% in 2009, compared with 3.33% in 2008.
                            2.93          3.33           3.44
                                                                                                            • Multiple internal mobilization initiatives were organized to change
                                                                                                              attitudes towards people with disabilities.




                            2007          2008           2009




19 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
ENVIRONMENT
                          WATER


                            TOTAL WATER CONSUMED EXCLUDING COOLING WATER               The quantity of water used by the group increased compared with
                            (in millions of m3)                                        2008, despite each site’s efforts.
                                                                                       Sites whose water usage rose sharply also reported a significant
                                                    19.4                               increase in production involving:
                                                                                18.7
                                                                  16.3                 • the start of new projects in the Mining Business Group,
                                                                                       • increased activity at the Creusot Forge and OL3 sites compared
                                                                                         with 2008,
                                                                                       • increased activity at the AREVA NC site in Pierrelatte with the
                                                                                         ramp-up of new cooling water production systems, and
                                                                                       • the use of more than 900,000 m3 of industrial water by Socatri to
                                                    2007          2008          2009
                                                                                         pump and treat water from the water table following the incident
                                                                                         of the summer of 2008.
                                                                                       The change from 2004 to 2009, at constant revenue, is a decrease
                                                                                       of 46%.
                            WATER CONSUMPTION BY REGION IN 2009 (in %)                 This performance reflects improved management of networks and
                                                                                       processes, including:
                            ■ Europe                                                   • campaigns to detect water leaks at the sites,
                            ■ North America                                            • «eco-attitude” initiatives to raise awareness among employees
                            ■ Africa                                                     and subcontractors,
                            ■ Asia-Pacific                                             • the promotion of water recycling and reuse.
                            ■ South Africa                                             As a result, water use decreased at some sites in 2009, particularly
                                                                                       at the Comurhex Malvési site (Chemistry Business Unit), where a
                                                             60
                                                                                       closed loop cooling system was placed in service in August 2007.
                                                                                       The system will save 1.34 million cubic meters of water per year
                                                                              6.4
                                                                                       and cut the site’s water use by more than 80%.
                                                                                       Through these initiatives, AREVA has been able to improve its
                                                                         31            management of the water cycle, particularly at the production sites,
                                                                                       so that less water is tapped from the natural environment.
                                                                                       These programs require in-depth knowledge of water uses and
                                                      0.3                              actual costs associated with management of the water cycle.
                                                            2.3




20 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
ENVIRONMENT
                          ENERGY


                            TOTAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION EXCLUDING EURODIF                                                    The following total energy consumption figures do not include the
                            (in mWh)                                                                                      Eurodif process. In 2009, a total of 3120 MWh of energy was
                                                                                                                          consumed, for an increase of 3.2% compared with 2008. The raw
                                                                           3,021      3,120
                                                       2,925                                                              data are not adjusted by business. At constant revenue, energy
                                                                                                                          consumption fell 25% from 2004 to 2009.
                                                                                                                          The largest consumers are implementing action plans based on the
                                                                                                                          findings of energy efficiency studies, with the goal of stabilizing and
                                                                                                                          ultimately reducing the group’s energy consumption. Our
                                                                                                                          methodological tools – the eco-efficiency awareness kit, best
                                                                                                                          practice handbooks, best available technologies, and energy news
                                                                                                                          – are sent to all group employees.
                                                                                                                          In 2009, the Mining Business Group was the group’s largest
                                                           2007            2008       2009                                consumer, accounting for 29% of the group’s energy consumption.
                                                                                                                          The Mining BG’s energy consumption increased by more than 8%,
                                                                                                                          chiefly due to an increase in Somair operations in Niger and the
                                                                                                                          ramp-up of Katco in Kazakhstan and UraMin Inc. in Namibia.
                            PURCHASED ENERGY                                  ENERGY CONSUMPTION
                            BY SOURCE IN 2009 (in %)                          BY REGION IN 2009 (in %)
                                                                                                                          Other noteworthy developments are:
                            ■ Electricity                                     ■ Europe                                    • a slight increase in energy consumption at AREVA NC La Hague,
                            ■ Heavy fuel oil                                  ■ North and South America                     which rose 2.9% compared with 2008, while GHG emissions fell
                            ■ Domestic heating oil                            ■ Africa and Middle East                      by 24% from 2008 to 2009 through the use of less carbon intensive
                            ■ Natural gas                                     ■ Asia-Pacific                                energy sources.
                            ■ Other                                                                                       • an 8% increase in energy consumption at the Equipment BU’s
                                                                                                                            Saint Marcel and Creusot Forge sites;
                                                                                                      66.6                • an increase in power consumption at the OL3 site due to increased
                                                                  7.6
                                                                                                                            construction activity.
                                            51.2
                                                                    19.1
                                                                                                                    9.8

                                                             14.5                                            18.2
                                                     7.6                                            5.4




21 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
ENVIRONMENT
                          GASEOUS RELEASES


                                                                                           In 2009, the AREVA group’s direct greenhouse gas emissions (GHG)
                           DIRECT EMISSIONS OF GREENHOUSE GASES
                                                                                           amounted to 757,966 metric tons of CO 2 equivalent, 1.8% less than in
                           (in thousands of metric tons of CO2 equivalent)
                                                                                           2008.
                           ■ Fossil energy
                                                                                           Over the 2004 to 2009 period, these emissions were down 60% compared
                           ■ SF6 (limited to the T&D business)                             with 2004 at constant activity (based on revenue).Fossil energies accounted
                           ■ Other, including N2O                                          for 46% of these emissions, while sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) represented 21%
                                                       991                                 and nitrous oxide (N2O) 26%.

                                                                                           SF6 emissions are limited to the T&D business. These emissions fell 26% in
                                                                       772          758    2009 compared with 2008 at constant revenue.
                                                371
                                                                                           N2O emissions were up 24% at the Malvesi site as operations returned to
                                                195              354          348          normal compared with 2008. An installation on the precipitation facility’s
                                                                                           ventilation system to decompose N2O into oxygen and nitrogen will enable
                                                                 207          162          the eradication of these emissions beginning in 2010.
                                                425                                        The La Hague site, whose boilers were the group’s only facilities subject to
                                                                              248          the NAP*, saw its GHG emissions drop 24% in 2009 compared with 2008,
                                                                 211
                                                                                           whereas its energy consumption increased by 2.9% on a comparable basis.
                                                      2007             2008         2009   This was achieved by increasing the use of electric furnaces for steam
                                                                                           production in place of furnaces fired with fuel oil.

                                                                                           In 2009, AREVA expanded its environmental reporting by including indirect
                           INDIRECT EMISSIONS OF GREENHOUSE GASES                          greenhouse gas emissions.
                           (in thousands of metric tons of CO2 equivalent)                 Since 2008, AREVA has offset 100% of its direct and residual GHG
                                                                                           emissions, representing some 758,000 metric tons (MT) of CO2 equivalent
                                                                                     386   in 2009.
                                                                       357                 To achieve carbon neutrality, AREVA is mobilizing internally to reduce its own
                                                       315                                 emissions as much as possible. The initial goal of a 50% reduction from
                                                                                           2004 levels by the end of 2011 has already been met, two years ahead
                                                                                           of time.




                                                      2007             2008         2009
                                                                                           *National Allocation Plan for greenhouse gases under the European Union
                                                                                            Emissions Trading Scheme

22 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
ENVIRONMENT
                          GASEOUS RELEASES


                                   EMISSIONS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS   Measured emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) came to
                                   (in thousands of metric tons)
                                                                             1,603 metric tons in 2009 compared with 1,189 metric tons in 2008.
                                                                  1,603
                                                                             The 35% increase from 2008 to 2009 reflects the growth in mining
                                                                             operations, particularly at the Somaïr site, but also the deployment of
                                                                             tools providing better data on VOC emissions.
                                        1,173       1,189




                                        2007         2008        2009




23 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data
2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data

Contenu connexe

En vedette

Salon actionaria présentation B2C
Salon actionaria présentation B2CSalon actionaria présentation B2C
Salon actionaria présentation B2CactionnairesENGIE
 
AREVA Rapport de croissance responsable 2009
AREVA Rapport de croissance responsable 2009AREVA Rapport de croissance responsable 2009
AREVA Rapport de croissance responsable 2009AREVA
 
Centre technique-brochure
Centre technique-brochureCentre technique-brochure
Centre technique-brochureAREVA
 
Usages, stratégie & économies d’énergie à l'UPC_ D_Ferrer_CPU -Paris 21/1/15...
Usages, stratégie & économies d’énergie à l'UPC_ D_Ferrer_CPU -Paris 21/1/15...Usages, stratégie & économies d’énergie à l'UPC_ D_Ferrer_CPU -Paris 21/1/15...
Usages, stratégie & économies d’énergie à l'UPC_ D_Ferrer_CPU -Paris 21/1/15...UPC-BarcelonaTech - Innovació i Comunitat
 
Aeca group Conseil en économies d'énergie à réussite
Aeca group Conseil en économies d'énergie à réussiteAeca group Conseil en économies d'énergie à réussite
Aeca group Conseil en économies d'énergie à réussiteAeca group
 
Notre maître mot est la sûreté, dans le transport comme dans nos autres activ...
Notre maître mot est la sûreté, dans le transport comme dans nos autres activ...Notre maître mot est la sûreté, dans le transport comme dans nos autres activ...
Notre maître mot est la sûreté, dans le transport comme dans nos autres activ...AREVA
 
Les économies d'énergie au quotidien (conférence du 15 novembre 2012)
Les économies d'énergie au quotidien (conférence du 15 novembre 2012)Les économies d'énergie au quotidien (conférence du 15 novembre 2012)
Les économies d'énergie au quotidien (conférence du 15 novembre 2012)Centre Urbain - Stadswinkel
 

En vedette (7)

Salon actionaria présentation B2C
Salon actionaria présentation B2CSalon actionaria présentation B2C
Salon actionaria présentation B2C
 
AREVA Rapport de croissance responsable 2009
AREVA Rapport de croissance responsable 2009AREVA Rapport de croissance responsable 2009
AREVA Rapport de croissance responsable 2009
 
Centre technique-brochure
Centre technique-brochureCentre technique-brochure
Centre technique-brochure
 
Usages, stratégie & économies d’énergie à l'UPC_ D_Ferrer_CPU -Paris 21/1/15...
Usages, stratégie & économies d’énergie à l'UPC_ D_Ferrer_CPU -Paris 21/1/15...Usages, stratégie & économies d’énergie à l'UPC_ D_Ferrer_CPU -Paris 21/1/15...
Usages, stratégie & économies d’énergie à l'UPC_ D_Ferrer_CPU -Paris 21/1/15...
 
Aeca group Conseil en économies d'énergie à réussite
Aeca group Conseil en économies d'énergie à réussiteAeca group Conseil en économies d'énergie à réussite
Aeca group Conseil en économies d'énergie à réussite
 
Notre maître mot est la sûreté, dans le transport comme dans nos autres activ...
Notre maître mot est la sûreté, dans le transport comme dans nos autres activ...Notre maître mot est la sûreté, dans le transport comme dans nos autres activ...
Notre maître mot est la sûreté, dans le transport comme dans nos autres activ...
 
Les économies d'énergie au quotidien (conférence du 15 novembre 2012)
Les économies d'énergie au quotidien (conférence du 15 novembre 2012)Les économies d'énergie au quotidien (conférence du 15 novembre 2012)
Les économies d'énergie au quotidien (conférence du 15 novembre 2012)
 

Similaire à 2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data

Control process ppt
Control process pptControl process ppt
Control process pptssuserdfaabb
 
The Four Levels of Training Evaluation + ROI
The Four Levels of Training Evaluation + ROIThe Four Levels of Training Evaluation + ROI
The Four Levels of Training Evaluation + ROIMichelle Buckland, B.A.A.
 
Competencies that Count
Competencies that CountCompetencies that Count
Competencies that CountMason Holloway
 
Integrating Board Policy with Outcomes
Integrating Board Policy with OutcomesIntegrating Board Policy with Outcomes
Integrating Board Policy with Outcomesalan masterton
 
RAMS 2013 Calculating roi when implementing a dfr program by mike silverman
RAMS 2013 Calculating roi when implementing a dfr program by mike silvermanRAMS 2013 Calculating roi when implementing a dfr program by mike silverman
RAMS 2013 Calculating roi when implementing a dfr program by mike silvermanAccendo Reliability
 
5.a systematic
5.a systematic5.a systematic
5.a systematiclibfsb
 
Install pms in moccis - a proposal
Install pms in moccis - a proposalInstall pms in moccis - a proposal
Install pms in moccis - a proposalHj Arriffin Mansor
 
Learning Transformation & Governance
Learning Transformation & GovernanceLearning Transformation & Governance
Learning Transformation & GovernanceCharles Jennings
 
Innovation & Business Excellence
Innovation & Business Excellence Innovation & Business Excellence
Innovation & Business Excellence brownmb
 
High Efficiency in Manufacturing Operations
High Efficiency in Manufacturing OperationsHigh Efficiency in Manufacturing Operations
High Efficiency in Manufacturing OperationsFindWhitePapers
 
Learning &amp; Development Intervention
Learning &amp; Development InterventionLearning &amp; Development Intervention
Learning &amp; Development InterventionAshok Narayanan
 

Similaire à 2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data (20)

Benchmarking
Benchmarking Benchmarking
Benchmarking
 
Savi chapter1
Savi chapter1Savi chapter1
Savi chapter1
 
Savi chapter1
Savi chapter1Savi chapter1
Savi chapter1
 
P742
P742P742
P742
 
P742
P742P742
P742
 
Control process ppt
Control process pptControl process ppt
Control process ppt
 
The Four Levels of Training Evaluation + ROI
The Four Levels of Training Evaluation + ROIThe Four Levels of Training Evaluation + ROI
The Four Levels of Training Evaluation + ROI
 
Competencies that Count
Competencies that CountCompetencies that Count
Competencies that Count
 
Integrating Board Policy with Outcomes
Integrating Board Policy with OutcomesIntegrating Board Policy with Outcomes
Integrating Board Policy with Outcomes
 
csx Q2_2006
csx  Q2_2006csx  Q2_2006
csx Q2_2006
 
csx Q2_2006
csx  Q2_2006csx  Q2_2006
csx Q2_2006
 
RAMS 2013 Calculating roi when implementing a dfr program by mike silverman
RAMS 2013 Calculating roi when implementing a dfr program by mike silvermanRAMS 2013 Calculating roi when implementing a dfr program by mike silverman
RAMS 2013 Calculating roi when implementing a dfr program by mike silverman
 
5.a systematic
5.a systematic5.a systematic
5.a systematic
 
Install pms in moccis - a proposal
Install pms in moccis - a proposalInstall pms in moccis - a proposal
Install pms in moccis - a proposal
 
Learning Transformation & Governance
Learning Transformation & GovernanceLearning Transformation & Governance
Learning Transformation & Governance
 
Innovation & Business Excellence
Innovation & Business Excellence Innovation & Business Excellence
Innovation & Business Excellence
 
High Efficiency in Manufacturing Operations
High Efficiency in Manufacturing OperationsHigh Efficiency in Manufacturing Operations
High Efficiency in Manufacturing Operations
 
P742
P742P742
P742
 
Learning &amp; Development Intervention
Learning &amp; Development InterventionLearning &amp; Development Intervention
Learning &amp; Development Intervention
 
Presentation by bhaskar bhindie ind ii
Presentation by bhaskar bhindie ind iiPresentation by bhaskar bhindie ind ii
Presentation by bhaskar bhindie ind ii
 

Plus de AREVA

Chiffres 2009, données économiques, sociales, sociétales et environnementales
Chiffres 2009, données économiques, sociales, sociétales et environnementales Chiffres 2009, données économiques, sociales, sociétales et environnementales
Chiffres 2009, données économiques, sociales, sociétales et environnementales AREVA
 
2009 Responsible growth report
2009 Responsible growth report2009 Responsible growth report
2009 Responsible growth reportAREVA
 
2009 Annual Results
2009 Annual Results2009 Annual Results
2009 Annual ResultsAREVA
 
AREVA, Business & Strategy Overview - Appendix 1 - Novembre 2009
AREVA, Business & Strategy Overview - Appendix 1 - Novembre 2009AREVA, Business & Strategy Overview - Appendix 1 - Novembre 2009
AREVA, Business & Strategy Overview - Appendix 1 - Novembre 2009AREVA
 
AREVA, Business & Strategy Overview - Novembre 2009
AREVA, Business & Strategy Overview - Novembre 2009AREVA, Business & Strategy Overview - Novembre 2009
AREVA, Business & Strategy Overview - Novembre 2009AREVA
 
AREVA, Business & strategy overview - Appendix 1 - November 2009
AREVA, Business & strategy overview - Appendix 1 - November 2009AREVA, Business & strategy overview - Appendix 1 - November 2009
AREVA, Business & strategy overview - Appendix 1 - November 2009AREVA
 
AREVA, Business & strategy overview - November 2009
AREVA, Business & strategy overview - November 2009AREVA, Business & strategy overview - November 2009
AREVA, Business & strategy overview - November 2009AREVA
 
AREVA, First Half 2009 Results And Outlook
AREVA, First Half 2009 Results And OutlookAREVA, First Half 2009 Results And Outlook
AREVA, First Half 2009 Results And OutlookAREVA
 
AREVA, résultats et perspectives à mi-2009
AREVA, résultats et perspectives à mi-2009AREVA, résultats et perspectives à mi-2009
AREVA, résultats et perspectives à mi-2009AREVA
 
AREVA, Business & Strategy overview june 2009
AREVA, Business & Strategy overview june 2009AREVA, Business & Strategy overview june 2009
AREVA, Business & Strategy overview june 2009AREVA
 
AREVA, business & strategy overview - April 2009 - Appendix1
AREVA, business & strategy overview - April 2009 - Appendix1AREVA, business & strategy overview - April 2009 - Appendix1
AREVA, business & strategy overview - April 2009 - Appendix1AREVA
 
AREVA, business & strategy overview - April 2009
AREVA, business & strategy overview - April 2009AREVA, business & strategy overview - April 2009
AREVA, business & strategy overview - April 2009AREVA
 
Alternatives magazine - Numéro 18 - Voyage au cœur du combustible nucléaire
Alternatives magazine - Numéro 18 - Voyage au cœur du combustible nucléaireAlternatives magazine - Numéro 18 - Voyage au cœur du combustible nucléaire
Alternatives magazine - Numéro 18 - Voyage au cœur du combustible nucléaireAREVA
 
Alternatives magazine - Issue 18 - All about nuclear fuel
Alternatives magazine - Issue 18 - All about nuclear fuelAlternatives magazine - Issue 18 - All about nuclear fuel
Alternatives magazine - Issue 18 - All about nuclear fuelAREVA
 
Alternatives magazine - Issue 19 - Extreme oil
Alternatives magazine - Issue 19 - Extreme oilAlternatives magazine - Issue 19 - Extreme oil
Alternatives magazine - Issue 19 - Extreme oilAREVA
 
Alternatives magazine - Numéro 19 - Les pétroles de l'extrême
Alternatives magazine - Numéro 19 - Les pétroles de l'extrêmeAlternatives magazine - Numéro 19 - Les pétroles de l'extrême
Alternatives magazine - Numéro 19 - Les pétroles de l'extrêmeAREVA
 
AREVA, resultats annuels 2008
AREVA, resultats annuels 2008AREVA, resultats annuels 2008
AREVA, resultats annuels 2008AREVA
 
AREVA, 2008 annual results
AREVA, 2008 annual resultsAREVA, 2008 annual results
AREVA, 2008 annual resultsAREVA
 
Learning more about radioactivity by AREVA - 2005 publication
Learning more about radioactivity by AREVA - 2005 publicationLearning more about radioactivity by AREVA - 2005 publication
Learning more about radioactivity by AREVA - 2005 publicationAREVA
 
En savoir plus sur la radioactivité by AREVA - parution 2005
En savoir plus sur la radioactivité by AREVA - parution 2005En savoir plus sur la radioactivité by AREVA - parution 2005
En savoir plus sur la radioactivité by AREVA - parution 2005AREVA
 

Plus de AREVA (20)

Chiffres 2009, données économiques, sociales, sociétales et environnementales
Chiffres 2009, données économiques, sociales, sociétales et environnementales Chiffres 2009, données économiques, sociales, sociétales et environnementales
Chiffres 2009, données économiques, sociales, sociétales et environnementales
 
2009 Responsible growth report
2009 Responsible growth report2009 Responsible growth report
2009 Responsible growth report
 
2009 Annual Results
2009 Annual Results2009 Annual Results
2009 Annual Results
 
AREVA, Business & Strategy Overview - Appendix 1 - Novembre 2009
AREVA, Business & Strategy Overview - Appendix 1 - Novembre 2009AREVA, Business & Strategy Overview - Appendix 1 - Novembre 2009
AREVA, Business & Strategy Overview - Appendix 1 - Novembre 2009
 
AREVA, Business & Strategy Overview - Novembre 2009
AREVA, Business & Strategy Overview - Novembre 2009AREVA, Business & Strategy Overview - Novembre 2009
AREVA, Business & Strategy Overview - Novembre 2009
 
AREVA, Business & strategy overview - Appendix 1 - November 2009
AREVA, Business & strategy overview - Appendix 1 - November 2009AREVA, Business & strategy overview - Appendix 1 - November 2009
AREVA, Business & strategy overview - Appendix 1 - November 2009
 
AREVA, Business & strategy overview - November 2009
AREVA, Business & strategy overview - November 2009AREVA, Business & strategy overview - November 2009
AREVA, Business & strategy overview - November 2009
 
AREVA, First Half 2009 Results And Outlook
AREVA, First Half 2009 Results And OutlookAREVA, First Half 2009 Results And Outlook
AREVA, First Half 2009 Results And Outlook
 
AREVA, résultats et perspectives à mi-2009
AREVA, résultats et perspectives à mi-2009AREVA, résultats et perspectives à mi-2009
AREVA, résultats et perspectives à mi-2009
 
AREVA, Business & Strategy overview june 2009
AREVA, Business & Strategy overview june 2009AREVA, Business & Strategy overview june 2009
AREVA, Business & Strategy overview june 2009
 
AREVA, business & strategy overview - April 2009 - Appendix1
AREVA, business & strategy overview - April 2009 - Appendix1AREVA, business & strategy overview - April 2009 - Appendix1
AREVA, business & strategy overview - April 2009 - Appendix1
 
AREVA, business & strategy overview - April 2009
AREVA, business & strategy overview - April 2009AREVA, business & strategy overview - April 2009
AREVA, business & strategy overview - April 2009
 
Alternatives magazine - Numéro 18 - Voyage au cœur du combustible nucléaire
Alternatives magazine - Numéro 18 - Voyage au cœur du combustible nucléaireAlternatives magazine - Numéro 18 - Voyage au cœur du combustible nucléaire
Alternatives magazine - Numéro 18 - Voyage au cœur du combustible nucléaire
 
Alternatives magazine - Issue 18 - All about nuclear fuel
Alternatives magazine - Issue 18 - All about nuclear fuelAlternatives magazine - Issue 18 - All about nuclear fuel
Alternatives magazine - Issue 18 - All about nuclear fuel
 
Alternatives magazine - Issue 19 - Extreme oil
Alternatives magazine - Issue 19 - Extreme oilAlternatives magazine - Issue 19 - Extreme oil
Alternatives magazine - Issue 19 - Extreme oil
 
Alternatives magazine - Numéro 19 - Les pétroles de l'extrême
Alternatives magazine - Numéro 19 - Les pétroles de l'extrêmeAlternatives magazine - Numéro 19 - Les pétroles de l'extrême
Alternatives magazine - Numéro 19 - Les pétroles de l'extrême
 
AREVA, resultats annuels 2008
AREVA, resultats annuels 2008AREVA, resultats annuels 2008
AREVA, resultats annuels 2008
 
AREVA, 2008 annual results
AREVA, 2008 annual resultsAREVA, 2008 annual results
AREVA, 2008 annual results
 
Learning more about radioactivity by AREVA - 2005 publication
Learning more about radioactivity by AREVA - 2005 publicationLearning more about radioactivity by AREVA - 2005 publication
Learning more about radioactivity by AREVA - 2005 publication
 
En savoir plus sur la radioactivité by AREVA - parution 2005
En savoir plus sur la radioactivité by AREVA - parution 2005En savoir plus sur la radioactivité by AREVA - parution 2005
En savoir plus sur la radioactivité by AREVA - parution 2005
 

Dernier

Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationScaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationRadu Cotescu
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsMark Billinghurst
 
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...Patryk Bandurski
 
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 3652toLead Limited
 
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreterPresentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreternaman860154
 
Azure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & Application
Azure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & ApplicationAzure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & Application
Azure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & ApplicationAndikSusilo4
 
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?XfilesPro
 
GenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
GenCyber Cyber Security Day PresentationGenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
GenCyber Cyber Security Day PresentationMichael W. Hawkins
 
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)Gabriella Davis
 
Enhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for Partners
Enhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for PartnersEnhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for Partners
Enhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for PartnersThousandEyes
 
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with NanonetsHow to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonetsnaman860154
 
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machineInstall Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machinePadma Pradeep
 
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure serviceWhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure servicePooja Nehwal
 
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food ManufacturingPigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food ManufacturingPigging Solutions
 
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time AutomationFrom Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time AutomationSafe Software
 
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Allon Mureinik
 
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
Understanding the Laravel MVC Architecture
Understanding the Laravel MVC ArchitectureUnderstanding the Laravel MVC Architecture
Understanding the Laravel MVC ArchitecturePixlogix Infotech
 
AI as an Interface for Commercial Buildings
AI as an Interface for Commercial BuildingsAI as an Interface for Commercial Buildings
AI as an Interface for Commercial BuildingsMemoori
 
[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf
[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf
[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdfhans926745
 

Dernier (20)

Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationScaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
 
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...
 
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
 
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreterPresentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
 
Azure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & Application
Azure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & ApplicationAzure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & Application
Azure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & Application
 
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
 
GenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
GenCyber Cyber Security Day PresentationGenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
GenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
 
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
 
Enhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for Partners
Enhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for PartnersEnhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for Partners
Enhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for Partners
 
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with NanonetsHow to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
 
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machineInstall Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machine
 
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure serviceWhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
 
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food ManufacturingPigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
 
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time AutomationFrom Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
 
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
 
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
 
Understanding the Laravel MVC Architecture
Understanding the Laravel MVC ArchitectureUnderstanding the Laravel MVC Architecture
Understanding the Laravel MVC Architecture
 
AI as an Interface for Commercial Buildings
AI as an Interface for Commercial BuildingsAI as an Interface for Commercial Buildings
AI as an Interface for Commercial Buildings
 
[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf
[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf
[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf
 

2009 figures, economic, social, societal and environmental data

  • 1. 2009 figures economic, social, societal and environmental data
  • 2. Sustainable development is the keystone of AREVA’s industrial strategy. In 2002, the group created its AREVA Way sustainable development initiative, which revolves around ten main commitments. These commitments are an integral part of the group’s management system, including the strategic action plan, the budget and the reporting process. They apply to all AREVA entities. AREVA Way is at once a state of mind, a goal and a way of acting specific to AREVA: – a way to be: attitudes and behaviors conducive to achieving these goals; – a way to go: a target balanced on the three pillars of sustainable development – economic, social and environmental – and broken down into 10 AREVA commitments; – a way to act planning and sharing performance improvement goals, performance objectives and action plans to achieve this target. It is a process of continuous improvement that works in conjunction with AREVA’s implementation of its ten commitments. AREVA Way drives the group’s sustainable development performance. The Report on Responsible Growth reviews our actions and our overall performance. The figures published in this supplement are the tangible results of the actions taken. NOTE: Unless otherwise explicitly indicated or specifically mentioned, all of the figures presented in this document include the Nuclear, Renewables and Transmission & Distribution* operations. *Operations held for sale in 2009 and discontinued on June 7, 2010
  • 3. Contents PERFORMANCE ENVIRONMENT IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE 20 Water* 01 Continuous Improvement* 21 Energy* 03 Innovation 22 Gaseous releases* 24 Liquid releases 25 Conventional waste* FINANCIAL 26 Radioactive waste PERFORMANCE 04 2009 results APPENDICES COMMITMENT 30 Reporting methodology TO EMPLOYEES 32 Auditors’ report 35 Social indicators 07 Stakeholder relations 37 Environmental indicators 10 Occupational safety* 40 Deployment of our sustainable 12 Health development initiative 13 Health and working conditions 14 Radiation protection* 15 Radiological impacts 16 Technological risks 17 Employees 18 Personnel and training 19 Workforce and diversity* * 2009 indicators verified onsite by the auditors
  • 4. PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT NUMBER OF AREVA WAY AREVA Way is the backbone of the group’s continuous improvement SELF-ASSESSMENTS COMPLETED initiative. It is based on standards that enable every entity to assess its ■ Sites and Business Units performance in terms of our 10 sustainable development commitments ■ Corporate and thus to set objectives that contribute to its own and to the group’s performance improvement. “Corporate” refers to the functional departments, which performed separate For each commitment, areas for improvement are themselves broken self-assessments. down into 121 performance improvement criteria. 212 214 The group’s entities assess their practices and actual performance for 201 each of these criteria on a scale of 1 to 4. The four assessment levels correspond to varying stages of performance improvement: launched, deployed, mature and excellent. This progression is indicative of a growing command of methodologies, a widening scope of coverage, increasing stakeholder involvement and ultimately better performance. 44 46 15 In 2009, due to the group’s reorganization, fewer self-assessments were performed at the corporate level. 2007 2008 2009 SCORE BREAKDOWN (in % of total operating entities) ■ Criterion not applicable ■ Level 1 4% 4 .2% 5% ■ Level 2 ■ Level 3 33% 37% 43% ■ Level 4 45% 40% 37.1% 17% 16.3% 13% 2% 2.4% 2% 2007 2008 2009 1 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
  • 5. PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT NUMBER OF CERTIFICATIONS As part of its sustainable development initiative, AREVA’s policies RECEIVED BY GROUP ENTITIES IN 2009 include the establishment of management systems to meet quality, environmental and safety goals. The entities – whether plants, administrative sites or commercial sites – must work towards integrating the different management 146 299 systems to ensure consistent leadership and focus resources on priority objectives. What is known as “integrated certification” can cover several fields 116 267 ■ ISO 9001 as well as several sites, several operations, or even several legal ■ OHSAS 18001 entities. By expanding the scope, interfaces are more easily ■ ISO 14001 managed. 99 235 ■ T&D share NUMBER OF MULTIPLE CERTIFICATIONS RECEIVED BY GROUP ENTITIES 75 The integration of management systems continued in 2009. The 69 63 number of entities with three certifications increased by more than 57 90% in one year, with the number of ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 39 certificates rising by 20% and 30% respectively. 22 ■ Dual certification (9001+18001 / 9001 +14001 / 14001+18001) ■ Triple certification (9001+18001+14001) 2007 2008 2009 2 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
  • 6. PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE INNOVATION R&D EXPENSES NUMBER OF PATENT The group’s research and development expenses increased in the (in millions of euros) APPLICATIONS Nuclear, Renewable Energies and Transmission & Distribution 521 businesses. R&D expenses totaled 521 million euros in 2009, or 3.7% 453 421 149 168 of contributions to revenue, compared with 453 million euros and 3.5% of revenue in 2008. 120 Taking into account all costs incurred for research and development, the group’s total R&D expenditure was 1.013 billion euros in 2009, or 7.2% of revenue for the period, down 11.2% compared with 2008. 3.7% The change in total R&D expenditure between the two periods reflects 3.5% 3.5% continued heavy growth in long-term project expenses, in line with the in % group’s strategic objectives, including: of revenue • development and modernization of production capabilities in the 2007 2008 2009 2007 2008 2009 front end of the cycle; • additions to the light water reactor line, and in particular the ATMEA1™ pressurized water reactor and the KERENA™ boiling CONTRIBUTION TO R&D EXPENSES water reactor; (in % of revenue) • development of fast neutron reactors; • performance improvement of equipment; 3.7 4.1 • preliminary design of future treatment and recycling plants; • reinvigoration of expertise; and 3.2 • synthetic oils and hydrogen. 2.9 ■ NUCLEAR ■ T&D 2008 2009 3 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
  • 7. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 2009 RESULTS CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME Nuclear and Renewables operations – Revenue growth excluding T&D (millions of euros) 2009 2008 Revenue from the Nuclear and Renewable Energies businesses was stable in France compared with 2008. Reported revenue 8,529 8,089 International sales were up 9.3% in relation to 2008 to 5.264 billion euros, or 62% of revenue. Operating income 97 (143) Foreign exchange had a positive impact of 67 million euros. Changes in consolidation scope Percentage of reported revenue 1.1% (1.8%) had a negligible impact. Net financial income 187 6 Backlog growth of 1.8% Share in net income of associates (152) 156 The backlog for the Nuclear and Renewables businesses came to 43.3 billion euros at Income taxes 138 109 December 31, 2009, for an increase of 1.8% in relation to year-end 2008. In the Nuclear business, new orders came to about 9.5 billion euros, confirming the strength Net income from discontinued operations 267 371 of the installed base business. Net income attributable to minority interests (15) (91) In Renewable Energies, the group signed a contract valued at more than 800 million euros in the offshore wind market, bringing the value of the backlog to more than 1 billion euros at Net income attributable to owners 552 589 December 31, 2009. of the parent Net income attributable to owners of the parent: 552 million euros Net income attributable to owners of the parent totaled 552 million euros in 2009, compared with 589 million euros in 2008. The change is chiefly due to the drop in net income from associates and from discontinued operations, offset by the improvement in operating income and financial income. Net earnings per share came to 15.59 euros in 2009, compared with 16.62 euros in 2008. 4 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
  • 8. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 2009 RESULTS CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEE Consolidated balance sheet Nuclear and Renewables operations - The assets and liabilities of operations held for sale in 2009, and subsequently discontinued excluding T&D (millions of euros) 2009 2008* on June 7, 2010, are reported under separate headings of the group’s balance sheet at ASSETS December 31, 2009, unadjusted for previous periods, excluding the receivables and liabilities that those operations had with other entities of the group, which continue to be eliminated in Goodwill nets 4,366 4,803 accordance with IAS 27. Property, plant and equipment 8,576 8,002 For this reason, the net value of assets and liabilities of discontinued operations reported on and intangible assets the balance sheet at December 31, 2009 is not representative of AREVA T&D equity at that date. End-of-life-cycle asset (third party share) 275 270 Financial assets earmarked 5,351 4,954 A stronger balance sheet for end-of-life-cycle obligations Based on the 2007 valuation of the debt to Siemens (2.049 billion euros, plus accrued interest), the group’s net debt comes to 6.193 billion euros at December 31, 2009, compared Investments in associates 1,635 1,757 with 5.499 billion euros at December 31, 2008. Other non-current fi nancial assets 860 2,152 The increase is chiefly attributable to the impact of negative free operating cash flow, the Deferred taxes (assets – liabilities) 150 140 payment of dividends and the increase in the net debt of the T&D business (which was held for sale in 2009 and discontinued on June 7, 2007), offset by the cash generated by the sale Working capital requirement (WCR) (62) 656 of equity interests in GDF-Suez and Total. Net assets from operations 5,649 - On a pro forma basis (including net cash to be received from the sale of T&D), the group’s held for sale net debt stood at 3.022 billion euros. These amounts should be compared with equity of 7.574 billion at December 31, 2009 LIABILITIES (including 990 million euros in equity contribution from the T&D division before elimination Equity 6,648 6,547 of the shares), compared with 7.292 billion at year-end 2008. In addition, the group’s liquidity was strengthened in 2009 as the result of a 3-billion euro Minority interests 926 745 bond issue, which brought debt maturity into line with asset maturity and freed up available Provisions for end-of-life-cycle 275 270 back-up lines of credit in an amount of some 3 billion euros. obligations – third party share Provisions for end-of-life-cycle 5,385 5,404 obligations – AREVA share Other current and 2,911 3,472 non-current provisions Borrowings 6,193 5,499 Liabilities of operations held for sale 3,685 - Other assets and liabilities 777 797 Summary balance sheet total 26,800 22,734 * including T&D 5 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
  • 9. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 2009 RESULTS CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS Nuclear and Renewables operations - Free operating cash flow before tax of -919 million euros excluding T&D (millions of euros) 2009 2008 Pre-tax free operating cash flow generated by the Nuclear and Renewables businesses in 2009 was stable at -919 million euros, compared with EBITDA 584 593 -900 million euros in 2008. Percentage of reported revenue 6.8% 7.3% The favorable change in working capital requirement offset the net increase Net gain on the sale of non-current operating assets and 314 190 in capital expenditures. other non-cash items Over the year, the impact of negative free operating cash flow in the amount of 919 million euros attributable to operating Capex was offset by cash Change in operating WCR 105 (173) generated by the sale of equity interests in GDF-Suez and Total totaling Net operating Capex (1,294) (1,130) 1.01 billion euros. Free operating cash-flow before tax (919) (900) End-of-life-cycle obligations (124) (115) Dividends paid by AREVA (309) (315) Change in net debt from discontinued operations (351) (177) Other (taxes, dividends from associates, etc.) 1,099 11 Change in net cash (debt) 694 (1,496) Net cash (debt) (6,193) (5,499) 6 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
  • 10. COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES STAKEHOLDER RELATIONS – Nuclear and Renewables operations – excluding T&D (1) This is not an accounting consolidation. CUSTOMERS REVENUE €8.529BN (2) To plan for the decommissioning of nuclear facilities as soon as they are brought on line, AREVA estimated its share of costs and constituted a portfolio to cover them. The earmarked portfolio is based on conservative assumptions regarding annual yield and how expenses are staggered. Provisions for end-of-life-cycle operations totaled 5.66 billion euros at December 31, 2009, of which 275 million euros are to be funded by third parties, with AREVA funding the remaining SUMS SUMS USED TO 5.385 million euros. REDISTRIBUTED ENSURE BUSINESS TO THE STAKEHOLDERS CONTINUITY Banks and financial institutions Year-end 2008 total of AREVA’s Interest expense share of provisions for end-of-life- €113m cycle obligations €5.385bn(2) Shareholders Dividends paid Year-end 2009 total €309m of provisions for retirement €1.121bn Suppliers Purchases of goods and services Net investment in property, €3.5bn plant and equipment and in intangible assets Employees €1.294bn Payroll expenses €3.353m Research and development €815.6m Public agencies Income tax €51m Société civile (including T&D) €18m(1) 7 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
  • 11. COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES STAKEHOLDER RELATIONS – Nuclear and Renewables operations – excluding T&D PERCENTAGE OF REVENUE INCREASE ACHIEVED IN The French government has defined a “protected sector” encompassing special work sites and PURCHASES OF SERVICES FROM THE PROTECTED support services, which together create an environment that makes it possible for people with SECTOR (in %) severe disabilities to work. AREVA’s protected sector program is headed up by the Purchasing department, which sets performance objectives for each site and measures progress. 0.67 The program focuses on efforts to create more national framework agreements, expanded actions at the sites in priority segments (green spaces, building services and small repairs, photocopying 0.56 and printing, disassembly of computer equipment, etc.), and optimization of tools provided by our national partners (marketplaces, database access, distribution of handbooks, etc.). 0.45 The purchasing department draws on a network of purchasing champions charged with deploying the program for the protected sector. The year 2009 confirmed the mobilization of buyers, for whom turning to the protected sector in setting up new requests for proposals is now a reflex and part of their daily work. Purchases from companies in the protected sector rose yet again, from 1.5 million euros to 5.3 million euros, an increase of nearly 30%. This figure corresponds to some 245 full-time jobs for people with disabilities. Examples of achievements and best practices: 2007 2008 2009 • Mail sorting and distribution at the AREVA Marcoule site is carried out by a company in the protected sector. • Locker room facilities at the MELOX plant are managed by AGK, a group of companies dedicated to hiring protected sector employees. • APOSIT, a company dedicated to hiring protected sector employees, manages document reproduction and data storage projects at the AREVA Tower. 8 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
  • 12. COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES STAKEHOLDER RELATIONS – Nuclear and Renewables operations – excluding T&D AREVADELFI PERFORMANCE* 2009 In 2009, the DRDEL continued its efforts to promote employment in industrial projects in France Committee meetings 3 in regions where the AREVA group operates and near the future Bure waste disposal center in the Meuse/Haute-Marne area. Applications approved 11 In 2009, and in areas in which we are based: Commitments authorized (in millions of euros) 1.331 • 80 projects were underway; • 11 projects were approved by the commitment committee. Number of jobs supported 265 Together, they represent 265 direct jobs over a three-year period and a commitment of Commitments made (in millions of euros) 14.067 1.3 million euros. Jobs created or in the process of creation over a 3-year With regard to business parks: 3,915 period • The 90,000 m2 Harfleur 2000 Enterprise Village, which is 99% rented, represents more than 800 jobs at the Harfleur and Chanliau sites, and the creation of annex sites is under *development capital company created by the group to promote economic consideration. development in countries in which it operates. • The first phase of construction of 7,500 m2 was completed at the Saint-Dizier park, and 3,500 m2 are already rented. The longer term objective is a second phase of construction and the creation of some 100 jobs. • Rehabilitation work continues at the 5,000 m2 Chalon-sur-Saône sugar mill, to be delivered in mid-2010, with the goal of creating 150 jobs in 2010. • Several other projects are under review with partners in the countries in which the group operates. In Niger, the partnership with Sinergi, a risk capital company formed with French and local partners, was expanded in 2009 with the creation of an AREVA “fund”, providing seed money for the first projects. 9 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
  • 13. COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY FREQUENCY RATE FOR WORK- NUMBER OF SITES BY FREQUENCY RATE AREVA continued to move towards zero accident in 2009 RELATED ACCIDENTS WITH LOST (FR) IN 2009 and has already outperformed the objectives set for 2010, TIME FOR AREVA GROUP EMPLOYEES 207 with a frequency rate of less than 3 and a severity rate of (number of work accidents per million hours worked) less than 0.15. The group ended the year with an average frequency rate of 2.04, i.e. lower than that of 2008, three times lower than that 3.55 3.19 of 2003 and well below the French industry average of 24.2 for 2008 (source: Social Security Administration/CNAMTS- 2008). 2.04 The severity rate for work-related accidents of 0.08 is well 29 below the 1.09 French industry average (source: Social 7 Security Administration/CNAMTS-2008). 5 1 2007 2008 2009 FR<5 5<FR<10 10<FR<15 15<FR<20 20<FR Despite these improvements, the group regrets to report two AREVA employee deaths and five subcontractor deaths in 2009 as a result of work-related accidents. SEVERITY RATE FOR WORK-RELATED NUMBER OF SITES BY SEVERITY RATE ACCIDENTS WITH LOST TIME FOR (SR) IN 2009 To achieve its goal of zero accidents, the group continued to AREVA GROUP EMPLOYEES 226 (number of days lost per provide tools and resources to support personnel, thousand hours worked) including: • continued training of safety engineers and managers; • missions to group entities to support them in their performance improvement plans; • meetings to share experience with the group’s major customers concerning safety management at the large construction sites. 0.11 0.10 0.08 15 4 4 2007 2008 2009 SR<0,2 0,2<SR<0,5 0,5<SR<1 1<SR 10 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
  • 14. COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY Safety is central to the group’s businesses and is one of the criteria used in selecting To continue to make progress towards an optimum level of performance and to the group’s subcontractors. improve the effectiveness of its management policy, AREVA draws on a structured AREVA strengthened its subcontractor selection process at the beginning of 2009 by ”Human and Organizational Factors” initiative in each entity, in collaboration with the implementing a directive on subcontractor occupational safety management. safety, environmental, quality and continuous improvement functions. Additional steps were taken, particularly in Asia, where the majority of these accidents occurred, including training and awareness raising in the local language in the areas of health, safety and the environment among subcontractor personnel. 11 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
  • 15. COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES HEALTH Deployment of the health policy approved by the Executive Committee in 2007 The 2010 program will focus on: continued in 2009. Related activities revolved around the following priorities: • the construction sites, • Improving occupational health with two directives, one on carcinogenic, • monitoring subcontractors, mutagenic and reprotoxic substances (CMR) and the other on noise; • continued deployment of the policy to prevent psychosocial disorders, and • Implementing public health initiatives: • continued protection against the impact of CMR substances. – continuing the HIV/AIDS prevention program, particularly in Niger; – continuing establishment of health observatories near mine sites in Gabon and Niger, and preliminary studies in Canada and Kazakhstan; • Implementing initiatives to improve the quality of life at work: – promoting employment continuity and equal opportunity for people with disabilities as part of the diversity initiative; – preventing psychosocial disorders, with a first pilot phase focused on listening and support at 16 sites and an evaluation of the quality of life at work at three sites. EMPLOYEES EXAMINED BY A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL DURING THEIR In 2009, the rate for the Asian and North American sites was lower than the average RECRUITMENT IN RELATION TO THE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES HIRED for the group (70% and 78% respectively), but higher than in 2008. DURING THE YEAR (in %) For Europe, Africa and South America, the rate was close to 100%. 98 99 88 2007 2008 2009 12 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
  • 16. COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES HEALTH AND WORKING CONDITIONS GROUP SITES THAT HAVE A PUBLIC HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AREVA promotes and participates in public health initiatives such as vaccination programs, stop smoking campaigns, the fight against obesity, etc. WORLD In all, of the 103 sites that have adopted public health 41 % improvement initiatives, 49 sites are in France, 9 are in Germany, 5 are in Brazil, 4 are in China and 4 are in India. EUROPE The number of group sites that have set up a public 45% health improvement initiative increased in each NORTH AMERICA region, as sites improved their understanding of the meaning of a public health improvement initiative. 25% ASIA 28% SOUTH AMERICA AFRICA 38% 53% GROUP SITES THAT HAVE A PROCESS GROUP SITES THAT HAVE DEVELOPED FOR LISTENING AND PROVIDING ACTION PLANS FOR INSERTION AND SUPPORT TO THEIR EMPLOYEES CONTINUED EMPLOYMENT OF WORKERS WITH A LIMITED CAPACITY FOR WORK* 46% 85% * This performance indicator is limited to the European sites. 13 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
  • 17. COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES RADIATION PROTECTION – Nuclear operations NUMBER OF 18,255 Radioactive doses received by AREVA and subcontractor EMPLOYEES EXPOSED employees fell in 2009, mostly in the nuclear services business. BY DOSE BRACKET IN 2009 The average dose from radiation exposure to AREVA group employees went from 1.19 mSv in 2007 to 1.04 mSv in 2009. Employees in the Mining, Nuclear Services and Clean-up business units are the most exposed. For subcontractor personnel working at AREVA sites, the average 3,333 radiation exposure is much lower and was declining after remaining flat for a certain amount of time, going from 0.49 mSv in 2007 to 301 0 0 0.39 mSv in 2009. <2 mSv 2 to 10 mSv 10 to 18 mSv 18 to 20 mSv >20 mSv Subcontractor personnel exposure was highest in the Mining, Recycling and Nuclear Site Value Development business units. NUMBER OF 14000 13,256 SUBCONTRACTOR No worker, whether of the AREVA group or of a subcontractor, EMPLOYEES EXPOSED received more than the maximum allowable dose of 20 mSv BY DOSE BRACKET 10500 IN 2009 in 2009. 7000 The maximum individual dose measured over 12 consecutive months was 16.01 mSv for an AREVA group employee and 3500 15.99 mSv for a subcontractor employee. 900 It should be noted that more than 83% of the group’s employees 63 0 0 0 and 93% of the subcontractor personnel working at AREVA sites <2 mSv 2 to 10 mSv 10 to 18 mSv 18 to 20 mSv >20 mSv received individual doses of less than 2 mSv over 12 consecutive months. For the record, the average annual exposure to naturally AVERAGE RADIATION EXPOSURE OF EMPLOYEES AND SUBCONTRACTORS occurring radiation is around 2.5 mSv in France. (in mSv) 1.19 1.22 1.04 0.49 0.50 0.39 ■ Employees ■ Subcontractors 2007 2008 2009 14 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
  • 18. COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT – Nuclear operations Inhalation Fallout (aerosols) A radiological impact assessment is performed for each nuclear site. This involves monitoring liquid and gaseous releases to the Air environment and analyzing their dispersion in the natural environment Milk External and the pathways by which radioactivity can reach humans: air; Gaseous releases plant or soil sediments; water in the form of drinking water, streams, Gaseous releases exposure Watering Ingestion Pasture rivers, or groundwater bodies; the marine environment through swimming, water sports, etc.; and foods such as milk, vegetables, Rainfall Drinking water meat or fish. The analyses take into account the lifestyles of the most exposed members of the public. Deposit on Crops ground Infiltration Stream The assessment covers population groups identified as being the To drinking water most exposed locally to the impacts of the releases. Groundwater Swimming, water sports Radiological impacts are monitored in accordance with local regulatory requirements under the strict control of national safety Liquid releases authorities. Methods may therefore vary as a function of regulatory requirements. The radiological impacts of the nuclear sites on the Ingestion Sediments Shellfish most exposed members of neighboring populations are represented Fish by an exposure indicator, the “additional effective dose”, expressed Seaweed in millisieverts per year (mSv/yr). 0.009 The nuclear facilities continue to have a very low radiological impact. RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT (in mSv) There is little change in radiological impact from one year to the next 0.0075 due to changes in production volumes and/or variations in weather 0.007 ■ 2007 conditions. The radiological impact remains well below the regulatory ■ 2008 limit for the general public of 1 mSv per year for the radiological ■ 2009 impact added by nuclear activities, and well below variations in 0.0015 0.0008 0.0009 0.0007 0.0006 naturally-occurring radioactivity and thus in estimated naturally- 0.0005 occurring radioactivity in France, averaging 2.4 mSv per year. La Hague Tricastin Romans 15 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
  • 19. COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES TECHNOLOGY RISKS – Nuclear operations NUMBER OF INES EVENTS IN THE NUCLEAR FACILITIES WORLDWIDE, Two events were ranked level 2 on the International Nuclear Event INCLUDING THE USA Scale (INES) in 2009, one at MELOX and one at AREVA NC ■ 2007 Cadarache (where the CEA is the nuclear operator). ■ 2008 ■ 2009 Both events were initially reported at INES level 1, but were classified at level 2 by the French nuclear safety authority ASN. 114 The most recent previous level 2 event occurred three years ago, 111 in November 2006. The level 2 event that occurred at MELOX in March 2009 was reported when a technical requirement intended to prevent the risk of a criticality was exceeded. The Cadarache event occurred in October 2009 when a higher than predicted quantity of residual nuclear materials was discovered 64 during glove box dismantling operations. This event led to a partial suspension of the dismantling operations. Lessons learned concerning the evaluation of residual quantities in workstations at facilities operated by AREVA were collected at the end of 2009. 23 21 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 > level 2 16 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
  • 20. COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES WORKFORCE The AREVA group had 79,444 employees at year-end ■ Fixed-term 2009, compared with 75,414 employees at year-end employment contract 75,414 79,444 2008, an increase of 5.34%. The group hired 65,583 74,039 12,675 employees in 2009. ■ Open-ended 69,395 employment contract 61,356 For the group as a whole, fixed-term employment agreements represent 7.17% of the workforce, including 33% (i.e. 1,821 people) hired under school-to-work programs, up 2.47% compared with 2008. Most of the school-to-work program participants are in France (72%), 4,227 6,019 2,599 Germany (15%) and India (6.4%). 2007 2008 2009 Engineers and managers represented 42% of the workforce in 2009, a two-point increase compared with 2008. Technical and administrative personnel represent 36% of the workforce, for a one point increase compared with 2008. WORKFORCE BY REGION (in %) Skilled workers represent 22% of the workforce, for a three- point decrease compared with 2008. ■ Europe ■ North and South America ■ Africa and Middle East 68 ■ Asia-Pacific 14 5 13 17 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
  • 21. COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES PERSONNEL AND TRAINING NUMBER OF HOURS OF TRAINING AGE PYRAMID PER EMPLOYEE PER YEAR ■ 2008 ■ 2009 33 30 28 10,460 10,473 10,006 10,102 9,942 9,309 9,366 9,298 8,733 8,593 7,860 7,934 6,083 5,383 4,951 4,210 1,720 1,389 319 298 2007 2008 2009 <21 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 18 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
  • 22. COMMITMENT TO EMPLOYEES WORKFORCE AND DIVERSITY PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN Diversity, equal opportunity and non-discrimination are a key component BY EMPLOYMENT CATEGORY of AREVA’s human resources policy. They are expressed through several 19.6 19.2 major commitments: ■ Executive management 18.0 18.4 ■ Management 18.1 • gender balance and professional equality between men and women; 16.0 ■ Skilled/unskilled workers, admi- • social, ethnic and cultural diversity; and nistrative/clerical, technicians, 8.0 9.2 9.0 • employment of the disabled. supervisors This policy was evidenced in the activities launched in 2008 that were extended in 2009: 2007 2008 2009 • Greater diversity in recruitment. In addition to engineers, AREVA decided to increase the number of university graduates, undergraduates and PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN technicians hired in apprenticeship positions and to support their IN NEW HIRES migration to engineering positions. 21 • The group held its first European Day of Gender Balance in the 18.74 18.87 Workplace, during which AREVA deployed about a hundred awareness initiatives at its European sites. The group’s objectives by year-end 2010 are: - a 20% ratio of women in management committees (the rate was 17.52% in Europe in 2009); - priority consideration of career opportunities for women during people 2007 2008 2009 reviews using the same criteria as those used to evaluate men. • The group pays close attention to career opportunities for new hires with diverse social, ethnic and cultural backgrounds. PERCENTAGE OF DISABLED PERSONS • Employment of the disabled. The group has achieved significant IN HIRED FOR PERMANENT POSITIONS progress in this area since 2006. The employment rate for people with disabilities was 3.44% in 2009, compared with 3.33% in 2008. 2.93 3.33 3.44 • Multiple internal mobilization initiatives were organized to change attitudes towards people with disabilities. 2007 2008 2009 19 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
  • 23. ENVIRONMENT WATER TOTAL WATER CONSUMED EXCLUDING COOLING WATER The quantity of water used by the group increased compared with (in millions of m3) 2008, despite each site’s efforts. Sites whose water usage rose sharply also reported a significant 19.4 increase in production involving: 18.7 16.3 • the start of new projects in the Mining Business Group, • increased activity at the Creusot Forge and OL3 sites compared with 2008, • increased activity at the AREVA NC site in Pierrelatte with the ramp-up of new cooling water production systems, and • the use of more than 900,000 m3 of industrial water by Socatri to 2007 2008 2009 pump and treat water from the water table following the incident of the summer of 2008. The change from 2004 to 2009, at constant revenue, is a decrease of 46%. WATER CONSUMPTION BY REGION IN 2009 (in %) This performance reflects improved management of networks and processes, including: ■ Europe • campaigns to detect water leaks at the sites, ■ North America • «eco-attitude” initiatives to raise awareness among employees ■ Africa and subcontractors, ■ Asia-Pacific • the promotion of water recycling and reuse. ■ South Africa As a result, water use decreased at some sites in 2009, particularly at the Comurhex Malvési site (Chemistry Business Unit), where a 60 closed loop cooling system was placed in service in August 2007. The system will save 1.34 million cubic meters of water per year 6.4 and cut the site’s water use by more than 80%. Through these initiatives, AREVA has been able to improve its 31 management of the water cycle, particularly at the production sites, so that less water is tapped from the natural environment. These programs require in-depth knowledge of water uses and 0.3 actual costs associated with management of the water cycle. 2.3 20 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
  • 24. ENVIRONMENT ENERGY TOTAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION EXCLUDING EURODIF The following total energy consumption figures do not include the (in mWh) Eurodif process. In 2009, a total of 3120 MWh of energy was consumed, for an increase of 3.2% compared with 2008. The raw 3,021 3,120 2,925 data are not adjusted by business. At constant revenue, energy consumption fell 25% from 2004 to 2009. The largest consumers are implementing action plans based on the findings of energy efficiency studies, with the goal of stabilizing and ultimately reducing the group’s energy consumption. Our methodological tools – the eco-efficiency awareness kit, best practice handbooks, best available technologies, and energy news – are sent to all group employees. In 2009, the Mining Business Group was the group’s largest 2007 2008 2009 consumer, accounting for 29% of the group’s energy consumption. The Mining BG’s energy consumption increased by more than 8%, chiefly due to an increase in Somair operations in Niger and the ramp-up of Katco in Kazakhstan and UraMin Inc. in Namibia. PURCHASED ENERGY ENERGY CONSUMPTION BY SOURCE IN 2009 (in %) BY REGION IN 2009 (in %) Other noteworthy developments are: ■ Electricity ■ Europe • a slight increase in energy consumption at AREVA NC La Hague, ■ Heavy fuel oil ■ North and South America which rose 2.9% compared with 2008, while GHG emissions fell ■ Domestic heating oil ■ Africa and Middle East by 24% from 2008 to 2009 through the use of less carbon intensive ■ Natural gas ■ Asia-Pacific energy sources. ■ Other • an 8% increase in energy consumption at the Equipment BU’s Saint Marcel and Creusot Forge sites; 66.6 • an increase in power consumption at the OL3 site due to increased 7.6 construction activity. 51.2 19.1 9.8 14.5 18.2 7.6 5.4 21 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
  • 25. ENVIRONMENT GASEOUS RELEASES In 2009, the AREVA group’s direct greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) DIRECT EMISSIONS OF GREENHOUSE GASES amounted to 757,966 metric tons of CO 2 equivalent, 1.8% less than in (in thousands of metric tons of CO2 equivalent) 2008. ■ Fossil energy Over the 2004 to 2009 period, these emissions were down 60% compared ■ SF6 (limited to the T&D business) with 2004 at constant activity (based on revenue).Fossil energies accounted ■ Other, including N2O for 46% of these emissions, while sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) represented 21% 991 and nitrous oxide (N2O) 26%. SF6 emissions are limited to the T&D business. These emissions fell 26% in 772 758 2009 compared with 2008 at constant revenue. 371 N2O emissions were up 24% at the Malvesi site as operations returned to 195 354 348 normal compared with 2008. An installation on the precipitation facility’s ventilation system to decompose N2O into oxygen and nitrogen will enable 207 162 the eradication of these emissions beginning in 2010. 425 The La Hague site, whose boilers were the group’s only facilities subject to 248 the NAP*, saw its GHG emissions drop 24% in 2009 compared with 2008, 211 whereas its energy consumption increased by 2.9% on a comparable basis. 2007 2008 2009 This was achieved by increasing the use of electric furnaces for steam production in place of furnaces fired with fuel oil. In 2009, AREVA expanded its environmental reporting by including indirect INDIRECT EMISSIONS OF GREENHOUSE GASES greenhouse gas emissions. (in thousands of metric tons of CO2 equivalent) Since 2008, AREVA has offset 100% of its direct and residual GHG emissions, representing some 758,000 metric tons (MT) of CO2 equivalent 386 in 2009. 357 To achieve carbon neutrality, AREVA is mobilizing internally to reduce its own 315 emissions as much as possible. The initial goal of a 50% reduction from 2004 levels by the end of 2011 has already been met, two years ahead of time. 2007 2008 2009 *National Allocation Plan for greenhouse gases under the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme 22 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES
  • 26. ENVIRONMENT GASEOUS RELEASES EMISSIONS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Measured emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) came to (in thousands of metric tons) 1,603 metric tons in 2009 compared with 1,189 metric tons in 2008. 1,603 The 35% increase from 2008 to 2009 reflects the growth in mining operations, particularly at the Somaïr site, but also the deployment of tools providing better data on VOC emissions. 1,173 1,189 2007 2008 2009 23 - AREVA 2009 FIGURES