Given at Bioversity/FAO meeting on Biodiversity and sustainable diets, 3-5 November 2010. Read more about Bioversity International’s work on diet diversity for nutrition and health: http://www.bioversityinternational.org/research-portfolio/diet-diversity/
Ensuring agricultural biodiversity and nutrition remain central to addressing the MDG1 Hunger target
1. Ensuring agriculture biodiversity and
nutrition remain central to addressing
the MDG1c hunger target
Jessica Fanzo PhD
Senior Scientist
Bioversity International
2. The MDG1c Target and its indicators
• Target 1C of the Millennium Development Goals seeks to halve, between
1990 and 2015, the proportion of people who suffer from hunger
• Target 1: underweight for age of children under five - composite indicator
• Target 2: proportion of population below minimum level of dietary
energy consumption
• These indicators are not perfect, and largely exclude the complexities of
food security, hunger and undernutrition
FOOD
PRODUCTION
FOOD
ACCESS
FOOD
UTILIZATION
FOOD
STABILITY
4. • 200 million children are chronically undernourished
• 2 billion people have micronutrient deficiencies of Fe, VA, I + Fo
• 60% of child deaths have an underlying cause of poor nutrition
• 1 billion people are overweight or obese and many in dev world
Beyond the MDG1: Current State of
Global Nutrition
5. How is this dire situation being
addressed?
Maternal Nutrition
Child Nutrition
Micronutrient Supplementation
Iodized salt
Treatment of acute malnutrition
Vitamin A supplementation
Zinc in treatment of diarrhea
Infant and young child feeding
These health-based interventions are critically important but have limitations
6. Food-related interventions are
hunger driven
Food-related causes Disease-related causes
Inadequate quantity Inadequate quality
UNDERNUTRITION
Most of the focus on “food related causes” of undernutrition = hunger-driven strategy
7. What about the underlying determinants
of undernutrition?
•Greater attention to hunger
and nutrition requires
integrating technical and
policy interventions with
broader and more integral
approaches
•This requires integration of
agriculture, health, water
and sanitation,
infrastructure, gender,
education, good
governance and legal,
judicial and administrative
protection
8. The Barriers So Far
• Tackling the determinants are not so easy:
Poverty, conflict, social and governance
issues
• Political complexities have made nutrition an
orphan
• Lack of coordination and funding
• Focus and scale-up of “stop gaps” in vertical
treatment-based health programs
• Agriculture research, programs and policy
have not focused on nutrition security -
this is a contributing factor to over simplified
diets, and a lack of diet diversity globally
9. PRODUCER SUBSYSTEM
NUTRITION SUBSYSTEM
CONSUMER SUBSYSTEM
Digestion (input)
Transport of Nutrients (transformation)
Utilization of Nutrients (output)
Access (input)
Preparation (transformation)
Consumption (output)
Production (input)
Processing (transformation)
Distribution (output)
set of operations and processes involved in
transforming raw materials into foods and
transforming nutrients into health outcomes,
all of which functions as a system within
biophysical and sociocultural contexts
A new approach:
Food and Nutrition Systems
10. Agricultural Biodiversity and the MDG1
• Agricultural Biodiversity: Pertains to the
biological variety exhibited among crops and
animals used for food and agriculture as well as
among organisms that constitute agricultural
ecosystems at ecosystem, species, and genetic
levels
• Critical as a coping mechanism against hunger
• Provides a rich source of nutrients for improved
diet diversity, which is correlated with improved
nutrition outcomes
• Important for environmental sustainability and
strengthening of local food systems
• Deriving direct benefits from agricultural
biodiversity is an incentive to conserve that
diversity – longer term thinking beyond the life
of the MDGs
11. Neglected and Underutilized Species
• Abundant but did not make the
transition into the global food
system or the nutrition agenda
largely
• Potentially important, but
neglected by science and
markets
• Nutritionally and functionally
complex
12. Critical Gaps of data, evidence and
operations research
• More timely and accurate data on hunger and
nutrition, particularly shocks and vulnerabilities
• Demonstrate, build and establish the evidence of
diet and health linkages to agriculture in diverse
food systems
• Improve delivery science of what food system
approaches are “working on the ground” and
“how they are working” to advance nutrition
• Inform policy and practices on this evidence
13. Critical gaps of policy
• Nutrition and hunger fall within a broader mandate that includes
agriculture, health, education, water and sanitation and other
departments. This poses clear challenges to leadership and
coordination
• Too often, no single entity or team takes primary responsibility for
working at the nexus of research, policy and program
development
• Dedicated policy and clear leadership at country level on food
systems work with country level ownership – nutrition and ABD
REQUIRE this expertise
14. Critical Gap of being proactive, not
reactive
• Wasted resources, without a
lens on local determinants that
impact hunger and nutrition
outcomes
• Approaches should be
prevention-rooted, and focused
on quick impact initiatives
linked with long-term
investments in the
determinants of hunger and
undernutrition, and ultimately
poverty
• Food assistance and safety nets
can help build physical assets
and strengthens human capital
to protect livelihoods, and build
resilience to shocks
15. With the Five Years Remaining
• Need to focus on operations and implementation of cross-sectoral
strategies that include food systems integration
• Vulnerable populations should come first – young children and
women, and geographically isolated
• Global Action: Ensure that international development initiatives
incorporate nutrition linked food system approaches in food security,
global health and social protection policies and programs
• National Action: Promote agriculture biodiversity conservation and its
role in nutrition in national Nutrition and Agriculture plans and policies
• Local Action: Retool joint nutrition and agriculture interventions into
regional and local programs, particularly in developing countries,
through a food systems lens
16. Wider MDG Agenda
• Hunger and undernutrition are inextricably linked to wider
progress towards all MDG targets
• They are both cause and consequence of gains in health, income,
education, gender equality and the environment
• A comprehensive approach to addressing hunger and nutrition
will therefore require working on multiple fronts
• These fronts include: health interventions, social safety nets to
protect people against risk and vulnerability, agriculture and
education at minimum
17. A Food Systems
Approach to achieving
the MDG1 Hunger
Target
• The work done so far in improving nutrition has not been adequate,
globally but rapid and sustainable gains in reducing undernutrition
and hunger is possible
• Supplementation, fortification, and agriculture “food production”
interventions to improve malnutrition are all necessary but
insufficient
• There has been a lack of focus on agricultural biodiversity and our
food system as a whole
• Although requires effort and funding upfront, Food Systems
Approaches holds promise for sustainability of the efforts in
achieving the MDGs
Editor's Notes
A declaration was made promising that the world would be food secure in 1996. This was reaffirmed in 2000 with the MDGs. As of 2010, we are far off the mark in ensuring that our global population is food secure and that countries are on track to meet the MDG1 hunger target which is to cut those who are hungry in half by 2015. We have 1 billion who are hungry, 200 million children who are stunted and irreversibly damaged, 2 billion who suffer from sort form of micronutrient deficiency– many being iron and zinc deficient, and another at least 1 billion who are 20% or more over their ideal bodyweight. This obesity trend is not just found in the US and other wealthy countries – but is rapidly increasing in some of the poorest countries in the world like the Congo, Tanzania, as well as highly populated areas such as China, India and Brazil.
If we break down the UNICEF framework, most of the interventions done have focused on disease related causes – treating the malnutrition. Very little focus has been on food related causes that address low diet diversity – the quantity and quality.Wheat, rice and maize > ½ the world’s food energy and provide up to 70-80% of energy for a person’s diet daily in the developing world.These cereals are high in carbohydrates so they do provide energy, have low to moderate protein but are low in micronutrients; often poor quality and overprocessed. Because these are the foods that are largely consumed daily, most suffer from limited diet diversity with profound micronutrient, protein and essential fat deficiencies. This also leads to poor child undernutrition due to Poor infant and young child feeding sources – stunting and poor developmentFurther, Due to heavy milling, many nations fortify refined flours;Unprocessed grains are often considered “poor man’s food” or not preferredAsian Green Revolution: Significant increase in production of wheat and rice but many of the secondary food grains such as pulses and millets were not emphasized. India is one of the worst states of undernutrition and carries the heaviest burden.
1. Achieving global food security and the MDG Hunger target requires a comprehensive approach that addresses the availability, access, utilization and stability dimensions of food security, focusing on immediate needs and assisting in building sustainability in order to eliminate the root causes of hunger and progressive realisation of the right to food.2. Hunger and undernutrition are inextricably linked to wider progress towards all MDG targets. They are both cause and consequence of gains in health, income, education, gender equality and the environment. A comprehensive food systems approach will therefore require working on multiple fronts.Although requires effort and funding upfront, Food Systems Approaches holds the most promise for sustainabilityRequires collaboration and coordination between sectorsWill ensure long-term resilience because involves behavior change, incentives and community driven action