Call Girls In Nangloi Rly Metro ꧂…….95996 … 13876 Enjoy ꧂Escort
Presentation 2 july 2013 clt allice pitini
1. HOUSING EUROPE
1
HOUSING in the EU
The potential for developing Community Land Trusts in Europe
Brussels 2 July 2013
alice.pittini@housingeurope.eu
2. HOUSING EUROPE
2
What is CECODHAS - Housing Europe?
CECODHAS - Housing Europe is the
federation of cooperative, public,
social housing
… a network of national and regional
housing federations of housing
organisations.
Together the 43 members in 18
European members States manage
25 million dwellings which represent
12% of the total housing stock in the
EU.
3. HOUSING EUROPE
3
What we do
Our members work together for a Europe which
provides access to decent and affordable housing for
all in communities which are:
socially,
economically and
environmentally sustainable…
…and where all are enabled to reach their full
potential.
4. HOUSING EUROPE
4
Housing bubble at the heart of current crisis
Subprime crisis in the US
triggered the financial crisis
Burst of housing bubble in the
US but also Ireland, Spain…
5. HOUSING EUROPE
5
Main factors
Increase in house prices up to
the crisis
Shortage of affordable housing
Nominal house prices increase
7. HOUSING EUROPE
7
Cost of housing in Europe
8% of Europeans and a third of
Europeans at risk of poverty spend
more than 40% of their budget on
housing
8% live in severe material
deprivation
17% Europeans faced either utility or
rent/mortgage arrears, or both in
2011 (14% in 2007)
6% Europeans thought it was quite
or very likely they will have to leave
their accommodation within the next
6 months because they can no
longer afford in 2011 (4% in 2007)
8. HOUSING EUROPE
8
Housing needs in the EU
In France 1.7 million pending social housing demands, and
yearly construction is 27.5% below the level required to
meet housing needs.
In Spain, 300 000 households are being evicted, and it is
estimated that 4 million people stopped warming their
homes because they could no longer afford it.
In England social housing waiting lists increased
constantly from about 1 021 000 in 1997, to over 1.8
million households in 2011
the number of those in need of local authority housing in
Ireland has increased by 75% since 2008, from 56 000
applicants to 98 000.
9. HOUSING EUROPE
9
Issues raising from the crisis
Raising poverty and inequalities as consequence of the
crisis = pressure on SH sector
Including ‘working poors’ – more vulnerable middle
classes
Decreasing public support (direct and through taxation)
Difficulties in access to credit
11. HOUSING EUROPE
11
Trends in tenures
Home-ownership in European OECD
countries (1980-2004)
Social housing in selected
EU countries (1980-2008)
12. HOUSING EUROPE
12
Social rental housing in the EU27
Largest in NL,
followed by AT
and DK.
UK, FR, SW and
FI also have a
large
social/public
housing sector
On the
contrary, no
rental social
housing in EL,
very small
share in CEE as
well as PT, ES
13. HOUSING EUROPE
13
Different providers usually co-existing
Public (municipalities, publicly owned companies)
often retreating from new construction due to budget constraints
often focusing on the poorest/most vulnerable
Private (mainly not for profit/limited profit organisations, but increasingly also
commercial developers)
In most cases ‘registered’ or ‘approved’ providers acting on not for profit basis
In some countries also ways to mobilise (temporarily) dwellings owned by private individuals or
commercial developers for social goals
Cooperatives sometimes market actors, sometimes social role (special case Eastern Europe)
Providers of social housing
14. HOUSING EUROPE
14
Cooperative housing
Note: figures only refer to CECODHAS members
Share of dwellings in housing cooperatives out of total national
housing stock
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
France
Belgium
Italy
Spain
Germany
Hungary
Estonia
Denmark
Austria
Norw ay
Sw eden
Czech Republic
Poland
15. HOUSING EUROPE
15
Cooperative housing in a nutshell
A housing coop is a housing business in the form of a consumer
cooperative mutually owned by its members, which operates in
accordance with the Cooperative Principles and Values. democratically
controlled by their members, according to the principle of “one
person, one vote”.
Equity model can be: Individual ownership = the resident member
holding full (most common in Eastern Europe), or partial title to the
housing unit.
Or collective ownership= the cooperative owns units and common
parts and members receive a contract, right to occupy the individual
housing unit on a permanent basis.
Non-equity model (or rental coop): the member has no ownership
stake, he pays a rent and has to surrender the housing unit back to the
cooperative if he leaves. Non-equity cooperatives are usually non-
profit. In many parts of Canada and the United States, Germany, also
Austria, Danmark, Belgium, Switzerland
16. HOUSING EUROPE
16
Are there other ways?
Co-housing
Building Communities (Germany)
Self-build experiences
… CLTs? Have the advantage of combining long-term affordability,
community involvement and cohesion, partnership at local level, not
only housing but a range of local initiatives/services
17. HOUSING EUROPE
17
3 MAIN EUROPEAN UNION POLICIES3 MAIN EUROPEAN UNION POLICIES
• COHESION
• ANTI-POVERTY
• SOCIAL PROTECTION
• SSGIs
• COHESION
• ANTI-POVERTY
• SOCIAL PROTECTION
• SSGIs
• INTERNAL MARKET
• COMPETITION
• STATE AIDS
• VAT RULES
• INTERNAL MARKET
• COMPETITION
• STATE AIDS
• VAT RULES
• ENERGY
• ENVIRONMENT
• WATER
• LAND protection…
• ENERGY
• ENVIRONMENT
• WATER
• LAND protection…
• EU STANDARTS
• EU LEGISLATION
• RESEARCH
• EU FUNDS ?
• GREEN VAT ?
• EU STANDARTS
• EU LEGISLATION
• RESEARCH
• EU FUNDS ?
• GREEN VAT ?
• LEGISLATION
• EU FUNDS
• OPEN METHOD OF CO-
ORDINATION (OMC)
• BEST PRACTICES
• LEGISLATION
• EU FUNDS
• OPEN METHOD OF CO-
ORDINATION (OMC)
• BEST PRACTICES
• LEGISLATION
• CONTROL
• NOTIFICATION
• DISPUTE – ECJ RULING
• LEGISLATION
• CONTROL
• NOTIFICATION
• DISPUTE – ECJ RULING
HOUSING POLICY
« FRIENDLY »
HOUSING POLICY
« FRIENDLY »
HOUSING POLICY
« FRAMELY »
HOUSING POLICY
« FRAMELY »
HOUSING POLICY
« COSTLY »
HOUSING POLICY
« COSTLY »
SOCIALSOCIAL
ENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL
ECONOMICECONOMIC
18. HOUSING EUROPE
18
More attention is given to housing in the framework of
the European economic governance: recognition that
dysfunctionalities of housing markets are an important
cause of the crisis
The European Semester 2013: 8/14 country in-depth
reviews concern the housing market: UK, ES, FR, IT, NL,
SI, FI, SE, DK
“Turning to households, deleveraging pressures are visible in a
number of Member States and are mainly linked to pre-crisis
housing market upswings. Downside risks for household
balance sheets and consumption are linked to potential
further corrections in housing markets.”
Housing in the European Semester
19. EU opportunities: Cohesion policy
Structural Funds; period 2007-2013: 9 billions € potentially eligible for housing
energy upgrade, and 4 billions for urban renewal and housing for marginalised
community. Beginning of 2012, less then 2 billions had been invested.
Next period: housing fully eligible for ERDF funding!
Energy efficiency: Former objective 2 regions will have to dedicate at least 20% to
support shift towards a low-carbon economy, including energy efficiency and use
of renewable energy in the housing sector
Social infrastructures: “(a) investing in health and social infrastructure which
contribute to national, regional and local development, reducing inequalities in
terms of health status, and transition from institutional to community-based
services; (b) physical and economic regeneration of deprived urban and rural
communities”;
Urban development: 5% of ERDF resources allocated to integrated actions for
sustainable urban development delegated to and directly managed by cities.
20. …. Thank you for your attention!
Alice.pittini@housingeurope.eu
Notes de l'éditeur
What happens in the housing market can have a strong impact on the whole economic and financial stability of MS.
In 2009, residential debt to GDP was over 100% in NL and DK for the second consecutive year. Linked with easier access to mortgage markets, relatively low interest rates, demographic and socio-economic developments. But also strongly linked to specific policies encouraging home ownership such as mortgage interest rate deductibility.
It ’s proving unsustainable, as shown by the number of housing foreclosures/repossessions
Today in most ‘old member states’ of the European Union we find a combination of actors involved, with public provision (usually by municipalities, either directly or through dedicated publicly owned companies) often coexisting with a growing private sector, mainly consisting of specialised non-profit or limited-profit bodies (such as for instance UK’ ‘housing associations ‘and Dutch ‘housing corporations’). In recent years local authorities are in many cases (e.g. UK, Austria) retreating from the production of new social housing and concentrating on the management of the existing stock. In some cases the public sector has specialized in the provision of what can be defined as ‘very social’ housing. This is the case for instance in Italy where different types of options for housing at controlled price exist but the public sector offers the lowest rents and targets the poorest people, similarly to Spain where ‘socially protected housing’ is provided for sale by a number of actors including the private sector, while a small proportion of social rental housing is provided by the public sector. A particular case is that of most Central and Eastern European countries where, with the exception of Poland and the Czech Republic, with massive housing privatisation after 1990, municipalities were left with a very small public housing stocks which largely still constitutes the only form of social housing today. Some countries in the region (e.g. Poland, Slovenia) have recently set up legal arrangements allowing for the creation of a non-profit housing sector. Interestingly, recent years have seen the increasing involvement with social housing provision by non-specialised actors (commercial developers and private landlords, as opposed to specialised ‘approved’ providers) who have been included as possible recipients of public subsidies in exchange for the use of dwellings for social purposes (low rents, tenants from social housing waiting lists), usually for a limited period of time. The typical example of this type of policy is Germany, where this change went hand in hand with the decentralization of housing policies to the local level and the privatization of public housing on a large scale.
In Poland almost 30% of the housing stock: housing cooperatives (homeowners) In Czech republic: 17% of the stock: rental housing cooperatives In Sweden, Norway: 15% to 17% of the housing stock
The current programming period (2007-2013) saw a gradual increase in opportunities for the sector, especially with regards to the use of funding from the European Regional development Fund to invest in energy refurbishment and renewables in the housing sector, as well as (since 2010) to improve the housing conditions of marginalised communities. Under the current legislative proposals for the new Cohesion Policy 2014-2020, housing is fully eligible - compared to the previous programming period, where housing was eligible only under certain strict circumstances. There are at least 3 areas where investment in housing could be co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund. With regards to energy efficiency, former objective 2 regions (the most developed EU regions in the EU) will have to dedicate at least 20% of their operational programmes to investment in supporting the shift towards a low-carbon economy in all sectors. In particular, investment should be made to support energy efficiency and use of renewable energy in the housing sector. There is therefore no ceiling any more for investment in energy refurbishment in housing, which means that a region is free to invest as much ERDF as they want on energy refurbishment in housing. One have to note that reference is made of housing sector in general, which means that every kind of housing is eligible to support and not only social housing. Furthermore, the European commission foresees an expenditure code for housing infrastructures under the area of social infrastructures, distinct from the investment in energy refurbishment of housing. It means that they expect the possibility of regions willing to renovate their housing stock under at least 2 circumstances, namely “ investing in health and social infrastructure which contribute to national, regional and local development, reducing inequalities in terms of health status, and transition from institutional to community-based services ” , and “ physical and economic regeneration of deprived urban and rural communities ” . Last but not least, the regulation stresses that at least 5% of the ERDF resources allocated at national level shall be allocated to integrated actions for sustainable urban development delegated to and directly managed by cities. It means that cities will manage at least 5% of the ERDF national pot directly to support urban development/renewal. Furthermore cities will be allowed to support pilot projects and studies to test innovative solutions linked to sustainable urban development.