1. DENSITY AND DESIGN
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE AND
COUNTRYSIDE
Professor Tom DanielsProfessor Tom Daniels
University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of Pennsylvania
CommunityMattersCommunityMatters
October 7, 2010October 7, 2010
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. Options Depend on the VisionOptions Depend on the Vision
One Vision: Compact villages surroundedOne Vision: Compact villages surrounded
by open countrysideby open countryside
Another Vision: Plenty of ruralAnother Vision: Plenty of rural
residential developmentresidential development
Another Vision: Village expansionAnother Vision: Village expansion
Importance of edges, transition fromImportance of edges, transition from
village to countryside: soft edge or hardvillage to countryside: soft edge or hard
edgeedge
12. OptionsOptions
Limited expansion: village growthLimited expansion: village growth
boundaries, tight zoning in theboundaries, tight zoning in the
countryside, purchase of developmentcountryside, purchase of development
rights close to growth boundary, transferrights close to growth boundary, transfer
of development rightsof development rights
Also, consolidation of village and townAlso, consolidation of village and town
governments (east and mid-west)governments (east and mid-west)
Multi-municipal plans, village-countyMulti-municipal plans, village-county
agreementsagreements
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20. 2000 Amendments to PA MPC2000 Amendments to PA MPC
Allow multi-municipal plans among two orAllow multi-municipal plans among two or
more municipalitiesmore municipalities
Allow revenue sharing across thoseAllow revenue sharing across those
municipalitiesmunicipalities
Allow the transfer of development rightsAllow the transfer of development rights
across municipal boundaries-This has not yetacross municipal boundaries-This has not yet
happened.happened.
Potential benefits: better location ofPotential benefits: better location of
development and preserved lands, moredevelopment and preserved lands, more
development in boroughs and citiesdevelopment in boroughs and cities
Potential Obstacles: Preservation in onePotential Obstacles: Preservation in one
municipality, more development and highermunicipality, more development and higher
taxes in anothertaxes in another