When we consider a data driven approach to hiring talent we extend far beyond knowledge and skill sets that traditional recruiting has accomplished. The new data driven approach is looking at identifiable and measurable psychological characteristics that can be assessed.
DBA Basics: Getting Started with Performance Tuning.pdf
Data Driven Approach to Hiring Talent
1. Organizational Team Index
A Data Driven Approach to Hiring Talent
by
Eduardo D. Diaz, PhD
2015
Copyright 2015 Eduardo D. Diaz. All Rights Reserved.
2. Introduction
• In the late 1990’s Dr. Julius Kuhl developed Personality Systems
Interactions (PSI) theory which identifies functional
characteristics known to influence human behavior and
motivation.
• It explains the entire self, perceived conclusions, and expected
outcomes of an individual.
3. Introduction
• Dr. Eduardo Diaz evaluated PSI, Five-Factor Model, other
personality assessments and organizational and psychological
research conducted by scholars like Blanchard, Myers, Briggs,
and Nielsen.
• In 2015 Dr. Diaz identified and published characteristics that
influence TEAM motivation and behavior.
• He then developed an Organizational Team Index (OTI) using
a Data Driven Approach to align individuals with other team
members in order to form teams that are better equipped to
complete assigned tasks.
4. Team and Organization
• A single team member’s behavior could influence an entire
organization.
• If a team member’s influence is not the best fit, it could have a
negative impact on organizational effectiveness.
• Managing team members from with-in team design using the
OTI could help guide overall team effectiveness; ultimately
improving organizational success.
5. Organizational Team Index
• When two or more individuals come together and form a team,
their functional characteristics interact; this interaction
influences team behavior.
• Their interactions could also form a type of ‘social niche’ that
could influence dependency on others with-in the group –
Dudley-Rowley (2000).
6. Applying PSI, we can identify Functional Characteristics and
systems which influence decisions.
Organizational Team Index
Individual
7. Object Recognition - Having awareness of ones physical locations and
social or spiritual locations through learned life experiences.
Organizational Team Index
Object
Recognition
8. Intuitive Behavior Control - Motor controls that move the individual in and
out of object paths.
Organizational Team Index
Intuitive
Behavior C Object
Recognition
9. Intention Memory - Part of the planning and execution of measures identified
as needed events to bring about individual objectives.
Organizational Team Index
Intuitive
Behavior C Object
Recognition
Intention
Memory
10. Extension Memory - Experiences which lead to the development of
perceived conclusions and expected outcomes.
Organizational Team Index
Intuitive
Behavior C Object
Recognition
Extension
Memory
Intention
Memory
11. Positive/Negative Affect Systems – influence the direction of these
emotional responses.
Organizational Team Index
Intuitive
Behavior C Object
Recognition
Extension
Memory
Intention
Memory
Pos/Neg
Affect Systems
12. Intuitive
Behavior C Object
Recognition
Action / State Orientation – known to influence individual and team
performance.
Organizational Team Index
Extension
Memory
Intention
Memory
Pos/Neg
Affect Systems
Action/State
Orientation
18. Organizational Team Index
• Action Step
• Every organization is different. The first step in OTI is
establishing an OTI baseline.
• Timeline
• An online Self Assessment is provided. It takes 20 minutes
per team member to complete the assessment.
• Measurable Outcome
• The OTI can be applied to identify team members who
will bring about increased organizational success.
19. Organizational Team Index
• Participants
• Applying inferential statistics for large organizations, the
OTI is established by evaluating 120 participants.
• Process
• The OTI baseline is established by correlating the
assessment scores with team and organizational
performance evaluations.
• Cost
• Contact Dr. Eduardo Diaz for details.
20. Organizational Team Index
• OTI Example:
+50-50 0-100 +100
|| | | ||| ||
+55.92
+44.49 +67.35+57.24
Optimal Team Alignment
21. Organizational Team Index
• Descriptive Statistics Example:
Descriptive Statistics
N Mean Std. deviation
MUT total 60 153.70 23.92
BEF/IMPAF total 60 691.62 71.17
AOF score 60 51.35 9.48