Detailing Coherent, Minimum Uncertainty States of Gravitons, as Semi Classical Components of Gravity Waves, and How Squeezed States Affect Upper Limits to Graviton Mass /• We present what is relevant to squeezed states of initial space time and how that affects both the composition of relic GW and also gravitons. A side issue to consider is if gravitons can be configured as semi classical “particles”, which is akin to the Pilot particles model of Quantum Mechanics as embedded in a larger non linear “deterministic” background. First Presented Saturday, September 3, 2011 at the G999 Conference, Philadelphia, PA http://ggg999.org/ Next Presentation : Friday, September 9, SAN MARINO WORKSHOP ON ASTROPHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY FOR MATTER AND ANTIMATTER http://www.workshops-hadronic-mechanics.org/ San Marino, N. Italy Discussion: The Nature of Semi-classical Nature of Gravity Reviewed; And Can We Use a Graviton Entanglement Version of the EPR System to Answer if The Graviton is Classical or Quantum in Origin? Publisher’s note: Dr. Beckwith: I am honored that you have seen fit to acknowledge me in your presentations of today, September 3, 2011 at the G999 Conference in Philadelphia, and Friday, September 9, at the San Marino Workshop on Astrophysics and Cosmology For Matter and Antimatter, in San Marino, N. Italy. In my view, these are rather extraordinary postulations, especially the probability of extra-universal black hole gravitational origins, along with expansion beyond Hawking of Quantum Wave theory and the “quantizing” of gravity. The latter may very well lead to a thorough reexamination of our concept of space and time, and that the latter might not be so unidirectional afterall. The potential is breathtaking, as it represents steps forward in proving the existence of subspace, the possibility of concomitant multi-universiality and 5D dimensionality of black holes. Can time manipulation and Biefeld-Brown suggested electro-gravitics as a spacecraft propulsive methodology be far behind? I think not…

1. COSMOLOGY The nature of semi-classical nature of gravity reviewed, and can we use a graviton entanglement version of the EPR experiment to answer if the graviton is classical or quantum in origin?

4. What can be used as a rule stick for measurement? Velocity used as a surrogate for distance – km/s for v<<c, otherwise red shift, z, where

5. Hubble’s Law (published 1929): H 0 = 72 (+/-5) km/s per Mpc

6. DYNAMICS OF THE UNIVERSE The Friedmann Equation: R is the ‘scale factor’ Λ is the ‘cosmological constant’ term k is the ‘curvature’: -1 corresponds to an open universe +1 corresponds to a closed universe 0 corresponds to a critical universe This has a simple but limited dynamical interpretation , and a complex but general geometrical interpretation

34. Actual Wesson 5 D line element, continued

40. Cross over to a new universe zone, if we use the Penrose

48. Simple representation of an un squeezed GW/Graviton (?) state/states?

55. “ Massive Graviton”, Continued? Formulas from Maarten’s applied

56. Ω M < 1 – matter will stop universal expansion after finite ( q 0 < 0.5) time (followed by recollapse, and a ‘Big Crunch’); a closed universe Geometry : positive curvature, k = +1 Ω M > 1 – gravity will never stop the expansion (an open ( q 0 > 0.5) universe) Geometry : negative curvature, k = -1 Ω M = 1 – a critical universe ( q 0 = 0.5) Geometry : flat (Euclidean), k = 0

59. In seeking to determine the deceleration of the universe, it turns out that it’s not decelerating at all; the universe is accelerating! So what is Ω M ? Well, whatever it is, there has to be something else involved in the dynamics of the universe? We generalize Ω to include not just matter, but all forms of mass/energy: Ω M = Ω B + Ω DM (+ Ω ν ....) Ω Λ (+ Ω starlight , Ω CMB ...) What is the geometry (i.e., what is Ω total ?)

66. From the entangled photon picture http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.2697