1. Adequate
Yearly
Progress
2010-‐11
Annual Report and Public Hearing
Georgetown ISD
February 16, 2012
2. Measures
Evaluated
• Reading/ELA
– Percent
of
students
(Grades
3-‐8
and
10)
who
are
Proficient
in
Reading/
ELA
– Percent
of
students
(Grades
3-‐8
and
10)
who
Par=cipate
in
Reading/ELA
• Math
– Percent
of
students
(Grades
3-‐8
and
10)
who
are
Proficient
in
Math
– Percent
of
students
(Grades
3-‐8
and
10)
who
Par=cipate
in
Math
• Other
– ABendance
Rate
• For
elementary
and
middle
school
campuses
• Districts
not
offering
12th
grade
– GraduaJon
Rate
• For
high
school
campuses
• Districts
offering
12th
grade
3. Standards
for
Performance
%
Proficient
100
%
93
87
92
of
students
80
83
must
pass
Reading
73
75
in
2014
Math
67
2009-‐10
2010-‐11
2011-‐12
2012-‐13
2013-‐14
4. Student
Groups
Evaluated
Performance
Par=cipa=on
Other
Indicator
Accountability
Subset
All
Students
Enrolled
ABendance
&
GraduaJon
•
All
Students
Group
•
All
Students
Group
•
All
Students
Group
•
African
American*
•
African
American*
•
Hispanic*
•
Hispanic*
•
White*
•
White*
•
Econ.
Disadvantaged*
•
Econ.
Disadvantaged*
•
Special
EducaJon*
•
Special
EducaJon*
•
Limited
English
Proficient*
•
Limited
English
Proficient*
*
Provided
that
these
groups
meet
the
Minimum
Size
Requirement
<
50
=
Not
Evaluated
|
≥
200
=
Always
Evaluated
|
50-‐199
=
Evaluated
if
equal
to
at
least
10%
of
the
All
Student
group
6. 2011
AYP
Report
Overview
Page
One
Performance:
Reading/ELA
(AYP
Target:
80%)
• Reading
Performance,
2010-‐2011
– Used
to
demonstrate
proficiency
• Reading
Performance,
2009-‐2010
– Used
to
calculate
improvement
(Safe
Harbor)
7. 2011
AYP
Report
Overview
Page
Two
Performance:
MathemaJcs
(AYP
Target:
75%)
• Math
Performance,
2010-‐2011
– Used
to
demonstrate
proficiency
• Math
Performance,
2009-‐2010
– Used
to
calculate
improvement
(Safe
Harbor)
8. 2011
AYP
Report
Overview
Page
Three
ParJcipaJon:
Reading/ELA
&
MathemaJcs
(AYP
Target:
95%)
• Reading/ELA
&
Math
ParJcipaJon,
2010-‐2011
– Used
to
demonstrate
par:cipa:on
• Reading/ELA
&
Math
ParJcipaJon,
2009-‐2010
– Used
to
calculate
2
year
average,
if
needed
9. 2011
AYP
Report
Overview
Page
Four
GraduaJon
Rate
(AYP
Target:
75%)
or
ABendance
Rate
(AYP
Target:
90%)
• GraduaJon
Rate
(Class
of
2010)
or
ABendance
Rate
(2009-‐10
School
Year)
– Used
to
calculate
whether
or
not
the
campus
or
district
met
the
target
rate
• GraduaJon
Rate
(Class
of
2009)
or
ABendance
Rate
(2008-‐09
School
Year)
– Used
to
demonstrate
improvement
• 5-‐Year
Longitudinal
GraduaJon
Rate
(Class
of
2009)
– Class
of
2009
10. 2011
AYP
Report
Overview
Page
Five
AYP
ExplanaJon
Table:
• Summarizes
the
results
of
the
AYP
report
• +
Meets
AYP
• – Not
Evaluated
• %
Missed
AYP
due
to
2%
and/or
1%
federal
caps
• X
Missed
AYP