SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  1
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Electric Utility, Inc. – Balanced Scorecard Example
                                 Objectives                                   Measures (D=Drivers)                            Targets                       Initiatives
                                                                                                                     FY01      FY02     FY03
  Customer Financial




                       •Maximize returns                    •ROCE
                                                                                                                     14%       14.5%    15%
                       •Profitable growth                   •Revenue growth                                           6%         8%     12%
                       •Leverage asset base                 •Asset utilization rate                                  80%        85%     90%
                                                                                                                     $150       $140    $125
                       •Manage operating costs              •Operating costs / customer
                       •Industry leading customer loyalty   •Customer Satisfaction Rating                            80%        85%     90%      •Customer loyalty program




                       Business Growth                      •% revenue from deregulated products/services              5%        7%      10%     •Telecom infrastructure development
                       •Capitalize on deregulation          •% trading revenue                                        10%       12%      15%     •Trading risk assessment
                       opportunities                        •Revenue from new services                               $500M     $550M    $600M
                       •Optimize trading opportunities      •% customers serviced through alliances/joint ventures    10%       20%      25%
                       •Develop innovative services         •NPV product/service pipeline                            $500M     $550M    $600M
                       •Use alliances and joint ventures    •% R&D projects meeting protocol gates (D)                90%       95%      100%    •Research alliance program
                       •Leverage cross-group R&D

                       Continued Public Support             •Customer/partner satisfaction (5 point scale)             4.0       4.5      4.5    •Preventative maintenance
  Internal Processes




                       •Proactively manage relationships    •Reliability index                                       90/100    92/100   95/100
                       •Ensure reliable services            •% communication/education coverage                      100%      100%     100%     •Community outreach
                       •Communicate/educate customers       •% communication/education plans executed (D)             80%       85%      90%

                       Customer Service Excellence          •Promise delivery %                                       90%       95%      97%     •Cross-selling marketing program
                       •Seamless cross-group delivery       •New product uptake rate                                  20%       25%      30%     •Service dispatch automation
                       •Understand customer drivers         •On-time market projects (D)                              90%       95%     100%

                       •Effective customer services         •Customer satisfaction rating C.S.D. (see above)          85%       89%      95%     •CIS upgrade
                                                            •Problem resolution cycle time C.S.D. (D)                  6hr       4hr      3hr    •Call center software integration
                       Optimize Core Business
                       •Optimize asset utilization          •% rate capacity attained                                 80%       85%      90%     •Fossil maintenance benchmark

                       •Max return on resource allocation   •Employee productivity improvement                         2%        3%      4%      •Shared service
                                                            •% cost reduction                                          4%        5%      6%      benchmark/outsourcing initiative
                       •Continued cost management           •Cost of disruption vs. plan                             +/-15%    +/-10%   +/-5%
                       •Enterprise-wide risk management     •Time to recovery (D)                                      8hr       4hr     2hr     •ERP Implementation

                       •Ensure market-driven skill          •Strategic skill coverage ratio                           65%       75%     85%      •Competency profiling
  L&G




                       •Leading employee satisfaction       •Hours in strategic skills training (D)                    10        12      15
                       •World Class Leadership              •Employee satisfaction rating (5 point scale)              3.0       4.0     4.5     •Performance compensation link
                                                            •Leadership effectiveness ratio (5 point scale)            4.0       4.5     4.5     •Leadership training program



©2010 Palladium Group, Inc                                                                                                                                                              1

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Organization Design - A Case Study
Organization Design - A Case StudyOrganization Design - A Case Study
Organization Design - A Case Study
PeopleWiz Consulting
 
Nora – Sakari A Proposed Joint-Venture in Malaysia
Nora – Sakari A Proposed Joint-Venture in MalaysiaNora – Sakari A Proposed Joint-Venture in Malaysia
Nora – Sakari A Proposed Joint-Venture in Malaysia
Hüseyin Tekler
 
The cage framework
The cage frameworkThe cage framework
The cage framework
dxbugs
 

Tendances (20)

Harrah's Entertainment, Inc. Case Analysis
Harrah's Entertainment, Inc. Case AnalysisHarrah's Entertainment, Inc. Case Analysis
Harrah's Entertainment, Inc. Case Analysis
 
Organization Design - A Case Study
Organization Design - A Case StudyOrganization Design - A Case Study
Organization Design - A Case Study
 
ETHICAL LEADERSHIP: RATAN TATA AND INDIA’S TATA GROUP
ETHICAL LEADERSHIP: RATAN TATA AND INDIA’S TATA GROUPETHICAL LEADERSHIP: RATAN TATA AND INDIA’S TATA GROUP
ETHICAL LEADERSHIP: RATAN TATA AND INDIA’S TATA GROUP
 
Capgemini
CapgeminiCapgemini
Capgemini
 
P&G Case Study
P&G Case StudyP&G Case Study
P&G Case Study
 
Maruti IR case
Maruti IR caseMaruti IR case
Maruti IR case
 
Nora – Sakari A Proposed Joint-Venture in Malaysia
Nora – Sakari A Proposed Joint-Venture in MalaysiaNora – Sakari A Proposed Joint-Venture in Malaysia
Nora – Sakari A Proposed Joint-Venture in Malaysia
 
Case Study : Procter and Gamble (P&G) Marketing Capabilities
Case Study : Procter and Gamble (P&G)  Marketing CapabilitiesCase Study : Procter and Gamble (P&G)  Marketing Capabilities
Case Study : Procter and Gamble (P&G) Marketing Capabilities
 
Propecia section b_group3
Propecia section b_group3Propecia section b_group3
Propecia section b_group3
 
Total Quality tools
Total Quality toolsTotal Quality tools
Total Quality tools
 
The Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire
The Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to AcquireThe Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire
The Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire
 
Case II Ameritrade
Case II   AmeritradeCase II   Ameritrade
Case II Ameritrade
 
Shoe corporation of illinois case study
Shoe corporation of illinois case studyShoe corporation of illinois case study
Shoe corporation of illinois case study
 
Conflict Management-Honda Motorcycle & Scooter India Pvt Ltd.
Conflict Management-Honda Motorcycle & Scooter India Pvt Ltd.Conflict Management-Honda Motorcycle & Scooter India Pvt Ltd.
Conflict Management-Honda Motorcycle & Scooter India Pvt Ltd.
 
Henry Tam and the MGI Team
Henry Tam and the MGI TeamHenry Tam and the MGI Team
Henry Tam and the MGI Team
 
The cage framework
The cage frameworkThe cage framework
The cage framework
 
P&g case study
P&g case studyP&g case study
P&g case study
 
The Walt Disney: The Entertainment King
The Walt Disney: The Entertainment KingThe Walt Disney: The Entertainment King
The Walt Disney: The Entertainment King
 
Alphabet Eyes New Frontiers
Alphabet Eyes New FrontiersAlphabet Eyes New Frontiers
Alphabet Eyes New Frontiers
 
Michigan manufacturing corporation. case pptx
Michigan manufacturing corporation. case pptxMichigan manufacturing corporation. case pptx
Michigan manufacturing corporation. case pptx
 

En vedette

8995951 sustainability-balanced-scorecard
8995951 sustainability-balanced-scorecard8995951 sustainability-balanced-scorecard
8995951 sustainability-balanced-scorecard
Soumya Sahoo
 
Sesion 3 indicadores perspectiva aprendizaje
Sesion 3 indicadores perspectiva aprendizajeSesion 3 indicadores perspectiva aprendizaje
Sesion 3 indicadores perspectiva aprendizaje
Augusto Javes Sanchez
 
Sesion 4 indicadores procesos internos
Sesion 4 indicadores procesos internosSesion 4 indicadores procesos internos
Sesion 4 indicadores procesos internos
Augusto Javes Sanchez
 

En vedette (14)

Balanced Scorecard Presentation
Balanced Scorecard PresentationBalanced Scorecard Presentation
Balanced Scorecard Presentation
 
CUADRO DE MANDO INTEGRAL BALANCED SCORECARD
CUADRO DE MANDO INTEGRAL BALANCED SCORECARDCUADRO DE MANDO INTEGRAL BALANCED SCORECARD
CUADRO DE MANDO INTEGRAL BALANCED SCORECARD
 
8995951 sustainability-balanced-scorecard
8995951 sustainability-balanced-scorecard8995951 sustainability-balanced-scorecard
8995951 sustainability-balanced-scorecard
 
Nestle Performance Management (1)
Nestle Performance Management (1)Nestle Performance Management (1)
Nestle Performance Management (1)
 
Cuadro de Mando Integral CMI
Cuadro de Mando Integral CMICuadro de Mando Integral CMI
Cuadro de Mando Integral CMI
 
Pepsico Final project
Pepsico Final projectPepsico Final project
Pepsico Final project
 
Sesion 3 indicadores perspectiva aprendizaje
Sesion 3 indicadores perspectiva aprendizajeSesion 3 indicadores perspectiva aprendizaje
Sesion 3 indicadores perspectiva aprendizaje
 
Adidas bsc
Adidas bsc Adidas bsc
Adidas bsc
 
Really Simple Balanced Scorecard
Really Simple Balanced ScorecardReally Simple Balanced Scorecard
Really Simple Balanced Scorecard
 
Cuadro De Mando Integral Perspectivas
Cuadro De Mando Integral   PerspectivasCuadro De Mando Integral   Perspectivas
Cuadro De Mando Integral Perspectivas
 
Sesion 4 indicadores procesos internos
Sesion 4 indicadores procesos internosSesion 4 indicadores procesos internos
Sesion 4 indicadores procesos internos
 
Nestle Performance Management (2)
Nestle Performance Management (2)Nestle Performance Management (2)
Nestle Performance Management (2)
 
Balanace score card ppt
Balanace score card pptBalanace score card ppt
Balanace score card ppt
 
Balanced Scorecard Aplicación e Implementación
Balanced Scorecard Aplicación e ImplementaciónBalanced Scorecard Aplicación e Implementación
Balanced Scorecard Aplicación e Implementación
 

Similaire à Sample balanced scorecard

Baldrige Quality 09c
Baldrige Quality 09cBaldrige Quality 09c
Baldrige Quality 09c
Britt Watwood
 
Six Sigma Simplified for Service Organizations
Six Sigma Simplified for Service OrganizationsSix Sigma Simplified for Service Organizations
Six Sigma Simplified for Service Organizations
Robert Jasper
 
Differential Value Proposition presented by GE and Valkre
Differential Value Proposition presented by GE and ValkreDifferential Value Proposition presented by GE and Valkre
Differential Value Proposition presented by GE and Valkre
BMAChicago
 
Key performance indicators 2010
Key performance indicators 2010Key performance indicators 2010
Key performance indicators 2010
Hj Arriffin Mansor
 
Uni Solutions Overview
Uni Solutions OverviewUni Solutions Overview
Uni Solutions Overview
santhosh9000
 
Bug deBug Chennai 2012 Talk - Business value articulation in software project...
Bug deBug Chennai 2012 Talk - Business value articulation in software project...Bug deBug Chennai 2012 Talk - Business value articulation in software project...
Bug deBug Chennai 2012 Talk - Business value articulation in software project...
RIA RUI Society
 
Cai Overview
Cai OverviewCai Overview
Cai Overview
deyoepw
 

Similaire à Sample balanced scorecard (20)

Making case for a virtual support center
Making case for a virtual support centerMaking case for a virtual support center
Making case for a virtual support center
 
Baldrige Quality 09c
Baldrige Quality 09cBaldrige Quality 09c
Baldrige Quality 09c
 
Business Objectives Matrix
Business Objectives MatrixBusiness Objectives Matrix
Business Objectives Matrix
 
Six Sigma Simplified for Service Organizations
Six Sigma Simplified for Service OrganizationsSix Sigma Simplified for Service Organizations
Six Sigma Simplified for Service Organizations
 
Differential Value Proposition presented by GE and Valkre
Differential Value Proposition presented by GE and ValkreDifferential Value Proposition presented by GE and Valkre
Differential Value Proposition presented by GE and Valkre
 
Product Spotlight: Oracle Profitability and Cost Management
Product Spotlight: Oracle Profitability and Cost ManagementProduct Spotlight: Oracle Profitability and Cost Management
Product Spotlight: Oracle Profitability and Cost Management
 
Logistics as Customer Service
Logistics as Customer ServiceLogistics as Customer Service
Logistics as Customer Service
 
Key performance indicators 2010
Key performance indicators 2010Key performance indicators 2010
Key performance indicators 2010
 
Uni Solutions Overview
Uni Solutions OverviewUni Solutions Overview
Uni Solutions Overview
 
Six Sigma
Six SigmaSix Sigma
Six Sigma
 
Business Value Articulation In Software Projects
Business Value Articulation In Software ProjectsBusiness Value Articulation In Software Projects
Business Value Articulation In Software Projects
 
Bug deBug Chennai 2012 Talk - Business value articulation in software project...
Bug deBug Chennai 2012 Talk - Business value articulation in software project...Bug deBug Chennai 2012 Talk - Business value articulation in software project...
Bug deBug Chennai 2012 Talk - Business value articulation in software project...
 
Introductory Advantage Presentation 4 1 09
Introductory Advantage Presentation 4 1 09Introductory Advantage Presentation 4 1 09
Introductory Advantage Presentation 4 1 09
 
Quality Management .pptx
Quality Management .pptxQuality Management .pptx
Quality Management .pptx
 
Softtek Break Through Savings No Need Offshore 2011 Asug Final
Softtek Break Through Savings No Need Offshore 2011 Asug FinalSofttek Break Through Savings No Need Offshore 2011 Asug Final
Softtek Break Through Savings No Need Offshore 2011 Asug Final
 
Cai Overview
Cai OverviewCai Overview
Cai Overview
 
Workforce Productivity in BPO
Workforce Productivity in BPOWorkforce Productivity in BPO
Workforce Productivity in BPO
 
Key Performance Indicators Worksheet
Key Performance Indicators WorksheetKey Performance Indicators Worksheet
Key Performance Indicators Worksheet
 
Guest satisfaction hospitality_industry
Guest satisfaction hospitality_industryGuest satisfaction hospitality_industry
Guest satisfaction hospitality_industry
 
Key Business Processes And Activities For Excellence PowerPoint Presentation ...
Key Business Processes And Activities For Excellence PowerPoint Presentation ...Key Business Processes And Activities For Excellence PowerPoint Presentation ...
Key Business Processes And Activities For Excellence PowerPoint Presentation ...
 

Sample balanced scorecard

  • 1. Electric Utility, Inc. – Balanced Scorecard Example Objectives Measures (D=Drivers) Targets Initiatives FY01 FY02 FY03 Customer Financial •Maximize returns •ROCE 14% 14.5% 15% •Profitable growth •Revenue growth 6% 8% 12% •Leverage asset base •Asset utilization rate 80% 85% 90% $150 $140 $125 •Manage operating costs •Operating costs / customer •Industry leading customer loyalty •Customer Satisfaction Rating 80% 85% 90% •Customer loyalty program Business Growth •% revenue from deregulated products/services 5% 7% 10% •Telecom infrastructure development •Capitalize on deregulation •% trading revenue 10% 12% 15% •Trading risk assessment opportunities •Revenue from new services $500M $550M $600M •Optimize trading opportunities •% customers serviced through alliances/joint ventures 10% 20% 25% •Develop innovative services •NPV product/service pipeline $500M $550M $600M •Use alliances and joint ventures •% R&D projects meeting protocol gates (D) 90% 95% 100% •Research alliance program •Leverage cross-group R&D Continued Public Support •Customer/partner satisfaction (5 point scale) 4.0 4.5 4.5 •Preventative maintenance Internal Processes •Proactively manage relationships •Reliability index 90/100 92/100 95/100 •Ensure reliable services •% communication/education coverage 100% 100% 100% •Community outreach •Communicate/educate customers •% communication/education plans executed (D) 80% 85% 90% Customer Service Excellence •Promise delivery % 90% 95% 97% •Cross-selling marketing program •Seamless cross-group delivery •New product uptake rate 20% 25% 30% •Service dispatch automation •Understand customer drivers •On-time market projects (D) 90% 95% 100% •Effective customer services •Customer satisfaction rating C.S.D. (see above) 85% 89% 95% •CIS upgrade •Problem resolution cycle time C.S.D. (D) 6hr 4hr 3hr •Call center software integration Optimize Core Business •Optimize asset utilization •% rate capacity attained 80% 85% 90% •Fossil maintenance benchmark •Max return on resource allocation •Employee productivity improvement 2% 3% 4% •Shared service •% cost reduction 4% 5% 6% benchmark/outsourcing initiative •Continued cost management •Cost of disruption vs. plan +/-15% +/-10% +/-5% •Enterprise-wide risk management •Time to recovery (D) 8hr 4hr 2hr •ERP Implementation •Ensure market-driven skill •Strategic skill coverage ratio 65% 75% 85% •Competency profiling L&G •Leading employee satisfaction •Hours in strategic skills training (D) 10 12 15 •World Class Leadership •Employee satisfaction rating (5 point scale) 3.0 4.0 4.5 •Performance compensation link •Leadership effectiveness ratio (5 point scale) 4.0 4.5 4.5 •Leadership training program ©2010 Palladium Group, Inc  1