According to PMI’s The High Cost of Low Performance 2014 Report, only 9% of organizations rate themselves as excellent on successfully executing initiatives to deliver strategic results. Consequently, only 56% of strategic initiatives meet their original goals and business intent. How do we change these statistics? As a PM, we often know if a project is doomed to fail at the very beginning. So, why do we let this happen? The little minute decisions (e.g., scope creep) make things even more complicated. There is more to just managing to a date/Gantt chart. We need to say NO when required and better manage to the change/risks. We need to see the forest through the trees. If this is not achieved, senior leadership support and your creditability are at risk.
Join your fellow colleagues to:
• Understand why complex initiatives fail
• Understand what we as PMs aren’t doing to manage risk
• Discuss tips for saying No, managing risks and avoiding the shiny objects
2. How many times do we know when projects are going to FAIL?
The Challenge – How do we say NO when we need to and still make the right impact?
Today, we will talk about 4 strategies to help you with this.
2
The Challenge
Only 9% of organizations successfully execute
initiatives to deliver strategic results*
Consequently, only 56% of strategic initiatives meet
their original goals and business intent*
* Source: PMI’s The High Cost of Low Performance 2014 Report
3. Logistics For Today’s Call
• The call is being recorded
• The recording and copies of slides will be made available at the
conclusion of the call
• We will have two poll questions, so be ready to answer
• Please enter your questions in the chat box at any time
• Tweet your comments during the call - #projectleadership
3
4. Kirk Williams
• Founder & CEO - KW3 Consulting
• Management Consultant for 18 years
• Worked for Accenture Consulting for 13 years
• Started KW3 Consulting 5 years ago
• Managed multi-million dollar business and technology
transformation initiatives
• Consulted with small, large and Fortune 500 companies.
Some include Wells Fargo, Cisco, JPMorgan Chase,
Callaway Golf
4
7. Why Most Projects Fail?
7
Senior Leadership
Expectations Are
Less Reasonable
Lack of Program
Planning
Hard to decipher
"reality" vs.
perception
Lack of critical
decision making
Too focused on
managing the
“Gantt chart” vs.
“Forest Thru Trees”
“Shiny Objects”
are distracting
9. Why Aren’t We Saying No?
9
• Job Security
• Fear of going “against the norm”
• We don’t have all the facts
• Concerned about reputation
• Distracted by “shiny objects”
11. BE CONFIDENT
• You have to say NO with confidence
• Have to build REPPORT and TRUST
• Folks have to believe that your primary objective is the success of the
project
11
Instinct
12. FOLLOW YOUR GUT
• We all have it – the “internal” barometer
• We know what does and doesn’t feel right
• Follow it!
• There are times where we have to show leadership and “break the norm”
to get your point across.
• Don’t get blind sided by the shiny objects
12
Instinct
13. BUILD RAPPORT WITH SENIOR LEADERS
• You have to build “great” rapport with Senior Leadership in
order for them to listen to you.
• When it comes time for the “tough” conversations, they are
willing to listen and “take it all in”
• Have to understand what’s important to them
• Senior Leaders want to feel like you hear and understand them
13
Soft Skills and Facts
14. 14
• Interview Senior Leaders
• Understand what’s important to
them and their concerns
• Get a clear understanding of their
current disposition
• A way to build rapport and trust!
Soft Skills and Facts
BUILD RAPPORT WITH SENIOR LEADERS
Technique – Stakeholder Commitment Process
15. 15
Soft Skills and Facts
• Stakeholder Commitment Curve
Details Summary
• Detail Notes and Actions
Required
BUILD RAPPORT WITH SENIOR LEADERS
Technique – Stakeholder Commitment Process
16. 16
• People will listen to you when you build good rapport and present the facts
• Begin with the end in mind - Know What Leadership Wants
• Putting status in terms that Executives understand
• Easily identify issues and risk areas
• Be consistent
Soft Skills and Facts
LEAD WITH FACTS
17. 17
Soft Skills and Facts
LEAD WITH FACTS
Technique – Executive Status Dashboard
18. 18
Soft Skills and Facts
LEAD WITH FACTS
Technique – Executive Status Dashboard
19. USE TRADE-OFF SCENARIOS
19
• Timeline is tough to meet
• Need alternatives to keep the schedule and still deliver
• Helps with consensus building
Soft Skills and Facts
20. • 3 Options
• Various scope options
• Pros and cons for each option
• Dependencies
# Option Revised Delivery Date Pros Cons Dependencies Recommend (Y/N)
Soft Skills
USE TRADE-OFF SCENARIOS
Technique – Trade-off Scenario Template
23. Poll #2
Based on what we talked about, what
strategy do you think is most helpful for
you in your situation?
23
24. Case Study #1 – Didn’t Say NO
Client and Project
A national banking
institution
Multi-year cross-line of
business and
technology
transformation project
Challenges Faced
Client spent $100M+
and minimal results
to show
Team came in to get
project on track
Said what they wanted
to hear and kept the
project moving
Lessons Learned
and Conclusion
In retrospect, needed to
say “NO”, stop and re-
baseline
Project continued to
cripple along and team
was eventually
downsized
24
25. Case Study #2 – Did Say No
Client and Project
A regional financial
services company
A business intelligence
project CFO reporting
CEO was very bullish to
get this done on time
Put “shiny object” in
front of us to incent us
Challenges Faced
Tight deadlines with
dependencies on other
projects
Dependencies were
causing project to slip
CEO would “blow a
gasket” for project
slippage
Lessons Learned
and Conclusion
Did the right thing and
said No
Built trust with Senior
Leaders
Always led with facts
Used trade-off scenarios to
make project successful
25
28. Off The Gantt Training Series:
Improving Executive Level Status
Reporting Workshop
28
During this workshop, we will cover the
following:
• Elements of an effective executive status
report
• Key areas that Senior Leadership care about
• Hands-on review of status reporting templates
• Hands-on review of stakeholder commitment
techniques
• How to effectively deliver status
Friday, December 19th
8:30am – 12:00pm PST
Downtown Los Angeles
Email INFO@KW3CONSULTING.COM
FOR MORE DETAILS AND CHECK OUT OUR WEBSITE
29. Next Webinar
• Thursday, January 29th
• Topic: Innovation – Moving From Strategy to Execution
• Stay tuned for more details….
29
30. Thank You For Joining Today!
30
www.kw3consulting.com
Follow Us on Social Media!
Notes de l'éditeur
Good morning everyone!
Welcome to KW3 Consulting’s Effective Executive Status Reporting Webinar.
My name is Kirk Williams – your presenter and facilitator for today’s discussion
Also, working me with today is Ms. Eva Pierce who help with fielding your questions and Q&A
This is our second webinar. Our first one dealt with managing project escalations with ties nicely to this topic as well.
As mentioned in the invite, today’s discussion is about THE POWER OF SAYING NO from PM standpoint.
To begin this discussion, let’s all agree on THE CHALLEGE we are discussing today.
Read the stats from a recent report from the PMI organization. GIVE STATS. (VERY COMPELLING)
THE QUESTIONS IS WHY IS THIS?
I WAS AT A RECENT LOCAL PMI EVENT – MODERATOR ASKED THE QUESTION
IF EVERYONE IN THIS ROOM IS ALL TRAINED, WHY ARE PROJECT FAILING (GIVEN THESE STATS)
How many times do we know a project is a FAILURE? Are we being honest with our senior leadership with the reality of the engagements?
How often are really speaking up, going against the norm, being the uncomfortable.
THE CHALLENGE - how can we say No when we need to and still make the right impact?
Today, we’ll talk about FOUR strategies to handle that
This applicable to any type of engagement – business, IT, operations, strategy
Recording and slides will be sent after the call
I will also post them on the KW3 Consulting website as well
Ask questions – chat box, questions box and on Twitter @statusreporting
18 years of management consulting experience
Worked with small, large and Fortune 500 companies
Here’s what we will cover in today’s discussion:
Types of status reporting
Executive Status Reporting Strategies
Case Study
Key Takeaways and Wrap-Up
First Poll – Why Do Most Projects Fail?
(Have participants take the POLL).
What Executive Care About?
True and Accurate
Simple
No Surprises
Decision Making
Executive Status is about “MANAGING UPWARDS”
I really want to drive home the point of “Shiny Objects Are Distracting”
Drive home the point to make the most important things the most important.
PM's can get distracted by perceived importance because one particular party makes noise.
What Executive Care About?
True and Accurate
Simple
No Surprises
Decision Making
Executive Status is about “MANAGING UPWARDS”
It is a balancing act between INSTINCT and SOFT SKILLS & FACTS
You need to have balance in dealing with the challenge
You JUST CAN’T SAY NO – WE CAN’T DO THIS. IF A PERSON DID THAT, HE/SHE WOULD BE ESCORTED OUT.
You have to do all of these things to manage the saying “NO”
say no with confidence even though you might not have confidence.
The PM may know that their opinion will not be popular.
Help them to ensure that the show the utmost care for the primary objective of the project.
Recording and slides will be sent after the call
I will also post them on the KW3 Consulting website as well
Ask questions – chat box, questions box and on Twitter @statusreporting
In helping with Leadership Engagement, the first thing you need to do is understand stakeholder disposition and commitment.
At KW3, we do formally and informally, depending on the project. But, we get it done.
From a process standpoint, we develop 4-5 questions and we meet with each of the leadership/executive sponsors. How they feel? Concerns? What’s in it for them? Based on that conversation, we are typically able to figure out their current disposition – COMMITTED OR OPPOSITION.
As you see here in the graph, the top curve is Commitment/Ownership and the bottom curve is Opposition/Failure. Along each one of these curves is varying level of commitment or dissatisfaction.
Obviously, the goals is to be on the top curve in the upper right.
Once you understand the level of commitment, then you can determine what actions need to be taken and with who.
How valuable is this? Your senior leader – you understand their current mindset, their concerns so you can react to them.
This will also help you when determining the “right” views for your Executive Level Status Reporting. CUSTOMIZED FOR THE NEED.
LEAD WITH FACTS
Need to understand the following:
1) what they care about
2) what they want to see
3) what type of communication they want
This all comes down to BUILDING TRUST THAT YOU GOT THIS HANDLED, AS THE “ACCOUNTABLE” PM FOR THE INITAITIVE
By a quick show of hands, who feels like that executives want too much status. Click “Hand” button.
THIS ALL COMES DOWN TO TRUST!!!!
MANAGING UPWARDS IS KEY
This is another unfortunate escalation.
REACTIVE
SURPRISE
Means an error occurred on team member side on why something wasn’t caught.
Typically, tying it back to behavior on the DISC model
Team members that work in siloes/do their own thing are a High C (Conscientious) or High S (Steadiness)
High C - Doesn't like to be rushed, Calm manner, Supportive actions, Humility
High S - Enjoys independence, Objective reasoning, Wants the details, Fears being wrong
Thinking about the C-suite and communication, the key strategy here is Trade-Off Scenarios
C-Suite wants options and a thoughtful process and thinking.
This means that there is impact to timeline, budget and/or resources (if it requires this type of escalation)
It is a balancing act between INSTINCT and SOFT SKILLS & FACTS
You need to have balance in dealing with the challenge
You JUST CAN’T SAY NO – WE CAN’T DO THIS. IF A PERSON DID THAT, HE/SHE WOULD BE ESCORTED OUT.
You have to do all of these things to manage the saying “NO”
If other, pleas provide input
Ask folks to give their ideas on what’s different