This talk is about the need for dual-mode universities (or DMUs), which offer both on-campus and online learning (OL) opportunities, to leverage its main strength in online course delivery, i.e. faculty, rather than trying to reproduce the single-mode university (SMUs) strength which is industrial-based, upfront course design, judged to be too labour-intensive and too costly for most DMUs. Furthermore, it is posited that the DMU’s true niche is graduate studies in OL, an area where SMU simply cannot compete given human resource shortages.
2. The educational climate
is changing
http://www.radio-canada.ca/nouvelles/societe/2012/04/21/002-personnalites-declaration-greve-etudiante.shtml
3. QUEBEC
• violent
protests on
April 20, The educational climate
2012 is changing
• (Students
warn that)
future
protests
over a
proposed
tuition hike
will become
“a little more
ferocious.”
http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/04/20/analysis-striking-quebec-students-given-a-free-pass-on-violence/
9. Online Learning - UCAL 2012
http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/senate/onlineeducation.march2012.html
UCOP is moving ahead with “Wave II” of the UC Online Instruction
Pilot Project (OIPP)…
despite lingering faculty concerns about the project and
against the advice of the Academic Council and a Senate
Advisory Council to slow down.
Many faculty are confused… faculty also worry that UCOE will
benefit only those students who can afford to pay up to
$1,400 per course
10. Oct. 12, 2011
• The specter and promise of online education is
perhaps nowhere more deeply felt than in
California, where campus administrators and
instructors are faced with a bloodletting.
• University of California … the system will have to
innovate out of the current financial crisis by
expanding online programs.
• Instructors, meanwhile, are terrified that this is
code for cutting their pay, or increasing their
workloads, or outsourcing their jobs to interlopers,
or replacing them with online teaching software.
13. OBHE –Olcott/Hanna
Rosovsky (2005):
“By 2010, there will be a hundred million in the
world fully qualified to proceed from
secondary education to tertiary education for
which there will simply be no room on any
campus anywhere”.
14. SUPPLY
BOTTLENECK
IN SUPPLY
of Higher
Education
DEMAND
www.elcolmadito.com/Arte/MasProductos/PerezCafetera_3_2.jpg
www.dreamstime.com
15. Teacher Education (09-10)
INCREASING DEMAND
“It is now clear that “bricks and
mortar” approaches to expanding
teacher education may not be
adequate if the current and
projected shortfalls in teacher
supply and low teacher quality are
to be properly addressed”.
16. INCREASING DEMAND
www.ifadem.org
« By 2015, more than 3,800,000 teachers
will be needed in Sub-Saharan Africa …»
Agence universitaire francophone (AUF) (2011). UNESCO Brief.
21. …every four years, the amount
of information doubles in the world …
http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/ev.php-URL_ID=25929&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
22. …every four years, the amount
of information doubles in the world …
…we estimate that, by the year 2020,
it will double every 73 days!
What will the impact be
on ONLINE LEARNING?
http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/ev.php-URL_ID=25929&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
24. Optimizing Higher Education
ACCESS QUALITY ACCESS QUALITY
Desired
Current State
State
COST COST
Source: http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/Daniel_0411AAOUShanghai.pdf
25. Increase Access?
IRON
ACCESS QUALITY
TRIANGLE
Current
State
COST
Source: http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/Daniel_0411AAOUShanghai.pdf
26. Increase Access?
= Cost increases & Quality decreases
IRON
ACCESS QUALITY
TRIANGLE
Not a solution
COST
27. Increase Quality?
= Cost increases & Access decreases
IRON
TRIANGLE ACCESS QUALITY
Not a solution
COST
28. Decrease COST?
= Quality & Access decrease
IRON
TRIANGLE ACCESS QUALITY
Not a solution
COST
29. HOW CAN WE BREAK OUT OF
THE “IRON TRIANGLE”?
ACCESS QUALITY
COST
30. HOW CAN WE BREAK OUT OF
THE “IRON TRIANGLE”?
ACCESS QUALITY
Daniel’s basic argument:
Distance-education universities alone
can enable us to break out of the Iron Triangle
Not a solution
FOR DUAL-MODE
COST UNIVERSITIES
32. OBSERVATIONS
1. Standards of quality highly variable, extreme
example: “diploma mills” (Noble, 1998;
Magnussen, 2005);
2. Demand increasing for higher education
worldwide yet access is limited (Daniel, 2007;
Rosovsky, 2005);
3. Costs spiraling out of control (Ucal, 2010) while
effectiveness questioned (Brown, 2008; Fink,
2005).
33. QUESTIONS
1. QUALITY? (high number of adjunct faculty… is
there level of commitment to quality optimal?)
2. ACCESSIBLE? (EX. Blended Learning… what
about the distant learner?)
3. COST-EFFECTIVE? (A lot of OL is based on “pay-
as-you go” Continuing Ed. model… costs have
to be kept low … but is it effective? Are
students simply buying their diploma?)
34. GOALS
1. Maintaining, even improving upon, QUALITY
(at least, based on campus benchmarks);
2. Increasing ACCESSIBILITY (opening up HE to
students wherever they live, Stanford prof);
3. Increasing COST-EFFECTIVENESS (making
universities responsible for cost overruns while
maintaining academic freedom and working
conditions; achieving faculty “buy-in”).
51. A Virtual classroom
A virtual Classroom
Faculty
member
SYNCHRONOUS
A community of inquiry approach
52. TEN-7019
A Basic Web Site
From Distance Education to Online Learning
Study Guide Quiz
Syllabus
Resources Forum Email
Assignment My Results Virtual Classroom
Drop
ASYNCHRONOUS
59. • Universities struggling to maintain some grad. programs;
• Universities needing to increase recruitment options;
booleanblackbelt.com
60. • Universities struggling to maintain some grad. programs;
• Universities needing to increase recruitment options;
• Graduate students often workplace professionals;
• Usually highly motivated and autonomous;
• Accustomed to learning via technology & networking;
• Small numbers involved (maximum 25 per class);
= Allows for the use of synchronous technology;
booleanblackbelt.com
61. • Universities struggling to maintain some grad. programs;
• Universities need to increase recruitment options;
• Graduate students often workplace professionals;
• Usually highly motivated and autonomous;
• Accustomed to learning via technology & networking;
• Small numbers involved (maximum 25 per class);
= Allows for the use of synchronous technology;
COMBINING SYNCH & ASYNCH MODES
booleanblackbelt.com
62. • Universities struggling to maintain some grad. programs;
• Universities need to increase recruitment options;
• Graduate students often workplace professionals;
• Usually highly motivated and autonomous;
• Accustomed to learning via technology & networking;
• Small numbers involved (maximum 25 per class);
= Allows for the use of synchronous technology;
COMBINING SYNCH & ASYNCH MODES
• Quality dialogue (leveraging a faculty strength);
• Higher accessibility (completely online);
• High cost-effectiveness (many costs offset; lower front-
end design; faster faculty online migration; flexibility).
64. Why now?
• Excellent Bandwidth speeds; Quebec, Canada envied;
• Cost of computers plummeting (Moore’s law);
• Spontaneous and instantaneous communications;
huge benefit of instant feedback(Paloff & Pratt);
• Interactivity, key to sustainable e-learning
environments (Rosenberg, 2001, 2006)
• The Internet generation (the Millennials are coming)…
highspeedinternetworld.com
65. REALITY
WORLDWIDE RESEARCH NETWORKS
an academic necessity in the 21st century
http://sites.google.com/site/changchienlily/BlankWorldMap.gif
http://sites.google.com/site/changchienlily/BlankWorldMap.gif
67. Does BOLD deliver the goods?
• FACULTY: QUALITY: same contact time/seat time,
same scheduling as F2F + lower front-end
design, faster start-up = higher faculty buy-in;
• STUDENTS: ACCESSIBILITY: all online + higher
interaction & lower isolation levels =
lower W-DO rates, higher satisfaction levels;
• ADMIN: COST-EFFECTIVENESS: lower start-up
• costs; higher off-campus student enrolment levels ;
• Greater flexibility & Capacity; many costs offset or
avoided= higher effectiveness (outreach) without
greater cost
http://sonoranalliance.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/ThumbsDown.jpg
68. Does BOLD deliver the goods?
• FACULTY: QUALITY: same contact time/seat time,
same scheduling as F2F + lower front-end
design, faster start-up = higher faculty buy-in;
• STUDENTS: ACCESSIBILITY: all online + higher
interaction & lower isolation levels =
lower W-DO rates, higher satisfaction levels;
• ADMIN: COST-EFFECTIVENESS: lower start-up
• costs; higher off-campus student enrolment levels ;
• Greater flexibility & Capacity; many costs offset or
avoided= higher effectiveness (outreach) without
greater cost
http://sonoranalliance.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/ThumbsDown.jpg
69. Does BOLD deliver the goods?
• FACULTY: QUALITY: same contact time/seat time,
same scheduling as F2F + lower front-end
design, faster start-up = higher faculty buy-in;
• STUDENTS: ACCESSIBILITY: all online + higher
interaction & lower isolation levels =
lower W-DO rates, higher satisfaction levels;
• ADMIN: COST-EFFECTIVENESS: lower start-up
• costs; higher off-campus student enrolment levels ;
• Greater flexibility & Capacity; many costs offset or
avoided= higher effectiveness (outreach) without
greater cost
http://sonoranalliance.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/ThumbsDown.jpg
70. Does BOLD deliver the goods?
• FACULTY: QUALITY: same contact time/seat time,
same scheduling as F2F + lower front-end
design, faster start-up = higher faculty buy-in;
• STUDENTS: ACCESSIBILITY: all online + higher
interaction & lower isolation levels =
lower W-DO rates, higher satisfaction levels;
• ADMIN: COST-EFFECTIVENESS: lower start-up
• costs; higher off-campus student enrolment levels ;
• Greater flexibility & Capacity; many costs offset or
avoided= higher effectiveness (outreach) without
greater cost
http://sonoranalliance.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/ThumbsDown.jpg
71. BOLD Research and Researchers
Instructional Design Distance Education/
& Online Learning/
Technology Blended Learning
BOLD
FACULTY GRADUATE
DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
ARE YOU A BOLD RESEARCHER?
72. BOLD Research and Researchers
DOCTORAL STUDENTS:
Instructional Design Distance Education/
- CARON, BOLD & technol. innovation & change
& Online Learning/
- COUTU, BOLD in indigenous communities
Technology Blended Learning
- FAKIH, BOLD in Arab-speaking countries
BOLD
- ROY, BOLD & the ID & EM working relationship
FACULTY GRADUATE
- SAVARD, BOLD and PLAR in Québec CEGEPs
DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
- ST-JACQUES, BOLD in graduate studies
76. More on BOLD
• Power, M. & Morven-Gould, A. (2011). Head of gold,
feet of clay: the online learning paradox. 12 (2)
IRRODL. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/916
• Power, M. & Vaughan, N. (2010). Redesigning online learning for
graduate seminar delivery.
Journal of Distance Education. 14(3)
http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/649
• Power, M. (2009). A Designer’s Log: Case Studies in
Instructional Design. Athabasca University Press
http://www.aupress.ca/index.php/books/120161 .
• Power, M. (2008). The emergence of blended online
learning. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching. (4)
4. http://jolt.merlot.org/vol4no4/power_1208.htm
michael.power@fse.ulaval.ca