This document discusses a pilot project to collect governance data on a forest fund in Brazil. It outlines three scoping questions to ask before starting data collection: availability of data, quality of data, and disclosure of data. It provides examples of alternative approaches when data is unavailable, incomplete, or not disclosed. These include using specific methodologies, case studies, interviews, and working with other actors. The conclusions emphasize that information mapping is useful for scoping assessments and that building trust with public agencies and informants is important.
2. GFI PILOT IN BRAZIL
• 2009-2010
• 82 indicators,
• Literature and
legislation review
• 60 interviews
3. 3 SCOPING QUESTIONS BEFORE
STARTING DATA COLLECTION:
Availability
of data?
Consequences
for the research
Quality of in terms of
data? time, money
and expected
results
Disclosure
of data?
4. EX: MT FLORESTA
GOVERNANCE Public
participation in
fund design
• State forest STRONG 3 Clear rules to
fund Monitoring fund
guide fund
established in effectiveness and
impacts 2
MODERATE replenishment
Mato Grosso in and distribution
2005
WEAK 1
Comprehensive
• Objective: and timely 0
to support forest financial reports
plantation and
restoration with Adequate Support for
the collection of capacity for vulnerable groups
logging fees management of applying to the
distribution… forest fund
Adequate forest
expertise for fund
administration
5. WHEN DATA ARE NOT AVAILABLE
EX: FF1.Public participation in fund design
• Who participates to the establishment of fund priorities?
To the establishment of procedures?
• Is there information disclosed on that process?
• Is there examples of objectives or rules review due to
stakeholders feedback?
• Specific methodologies
• Case study versus overall assessment
• Interview for perception data
6. WHEN AVAILABLE DATA ARE NOT
COMPLETE/ACCURATE/UPDATED/RELIABLE
Ex: FF8. Monitoring of fund effectiveness and impacts
• What are the indicators and criteria used for monitoring?
• What is the frequency/periodicity of monitoring?
• How are stakeholders consulted?
• Lack of accuracy/ updating of public data
could be a governance finding
• Specific methodologies
• Case study versus overall assessment
• Interview for perception data
7. WHEN DATA ARE NOT DISCLOSED
EX: FF7. Comprehensive and timely financial report
• Are financial reports accessible?
• What is in the reports?
• Lack of disclosure is a governance finding
and could be an advocacy target
• Help: others actors (State Prosecutor)
8. CONCLUSIONS
• Information mapping as a first scoping step for
governance assessment help to measure the
research effort (time and money) and to know
what is feasible
• Importance of good relationship/ trust with public
agencies and informants in general
Notes de l'éditeur
ICV and Imazon have been piloting the GFI indicators assessment in Brazil.That assessment is both comprehensive and detailedand we want is to be based on objective data, so the data collection is a crucial issue hereSince the idea of piloting GFI is exactly about testinghow to address information gap and how to design methodologies to fill itWe just wanted to share with you some reflections we have on the data collection process
We chose to apply the assessment to MT and Para states because they presents the highest rate of deforestation in the Amazon in the last ten years.Since the GFI is a governance assessment in the context for REDD, it was relevant.We worked with the 4 issues of the GFI framework (tenure, zoning, forest management and forest financial flows).For that, we proceeded to a massive literature and legislation review, and to more than 60 interviews
One of the lessons of the pilot phase = necessity of an information scoping stepDefinition of each:-Availability-Quality-Disclosure
To illustrate it,We worked on the 4 issues of the GFI framework, and the example I chose to illustrate the data collection process belongs to the forest financial flows category.We assessed the way state forest fund were managed. A core governance issue for REDD, since fund could be a channel to distribute REDD funds.How 4 state forest fund are currently being managed