SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  18
Snapshot Tutorial
 Lincoln-Douglas Debate is 
a VALUE debate, meaning it is a debate about 
what ought to be rather than specific policy. 
 It is usually a topic regarding the conflict 
between the rights of the individual opposed to 
the rights of the larger society. 
 The topic changes every two months; it is 
chosen by the National Forensic League.
 A round of Lincoln-Douglas Debate is the 
debate of one person from one school 
arguing against a person from a dif ferent 
school. 
 At a debate tournament, each student will 
debate at least 3-4 times. The larger the 
tournament, the more rounds will be 
guaranteed.
 During a typical tournament, debaters will 
argue both sides of the topic. 
 Usually, each debater will be assigned the 
affirmative side for two rounds and the 
negative side on two other rounds. 
 A Lincoln-Douglas debate round lasts about 45 
minutes. The times for the various 
speeches are very structured, as are the 
purposes of the speeches.
 6 minute Affirmative Constructive (AC) 
 3 minute Negative Cross Examination 
 7 minute Negative Constructive/Rebuttal (NC) 
 3 minute Affirmative Cross Examination 
(questions/answers) 
 4 minute Affirmative Reconstructive/Rebuttal (1AR) 
 6 minute Negative Reconstructive/Rebuttal (NR) 
 3 minute Affirmative 
Reconstructive/Rebuttal/Crystallization (2AR) 
 It helps to memorize: "6 - 3 - 7 - 3 - 4 - 6 - 3"
 6 minute Affirmative Constructive. This 
speech is prepared ahead, rehearsed and 
should be perfectly timed. It is a 
presentation of the affirmative's position and 
establishes his/her stance. 
 3 minute Negative Cross Examination. 
The Negative asks for clarification, asks for 
repetition of certain points, and tries to set 
up the affirmative to admit damaging 
information. 
 7 minute Negative Constructive/ 
Rebuttal. This speech really has two parts: 
The first part is a written, rehearsed speech 
that builds the negative case and is about 
four minutes long. In the second part, the 
negative must attack his/her opponent's 
points. The attack takes the last three 
minutes. 
 3 minute Affirmative Cross 
Examination. Now it's the affirmative's turn 
to question the negative, asking for 
clarification 
and trying to lead him/her down an ivy-covered 
path to destruction. 
 4 minute Affirmative 
Reconstructive/Rebuttal. The affirmative 
doesn't have much time here, so she/he has to 
talk fast. She/he must go down the flow 
(outline) of the argumentation, hitting any 
arguments against her/his own case and then 
attacking each of her/his opponent's 
arguments. Again, two parts: Rebuild and 
Attack. 
 6 minute Negative Reconstructive/ 
Rebuttal. This speech has three parts: 
Rebuild, Attack and Crystallize: 
about two minutes to rebuild any arguments 
against the negative's own case; two minutes 
to attack the affirmative; and two minutes to 
summarize the voting issues for the judge. 
 3 minute Affirmative 
Reconstructive/Rebuttal. This is a very 
short speech--time only to argue the most 
important points, attack the negative's voting 
issues, and crystallize the affirmative's own 
voting points.
 Our Team subscribes to publishers who create 
DEBATE BRIEFS 
 A Brief is a collection of evidence, arguments, 
current topic analysis, definitions, etc. 
 Briefs are helpful, but remember that other 
teams may also have these collections 
 Evidence can also be found on the internet, but 
only use CREDIBLE sources (NY Times, WA 
Post, etc.)
 You will need to write TWO speeches: the 
affirmative (6 min.) that says that the 
resolution is true and the negative (3-4 min) 
that says that the resolution is false. 
 You will use your affirmative speech in two of 
your debates and your negative speech in the 
other two debates.
 Step One: The Resolution. 
The resolution is a statement 
of the topic of the debate. The 
entire debate is a test of the 
validity of this statement. 
Therefore, wording and 
semantics are crucial. 
Each important word must be 
defined from different 
angles. 
 After a brief opening 
paragraph using the resolution 
as the thesis statement, 
or in the case of the negative, 
its antithesis, you will state 
your definitions. 
 Step Two: The Value 
Premise. 
 Remember that we said that 
Lincoln-Douglas Debate is a 
VALUE debate about what 
ought to be, right? 
 Each debate speech will center 
on a value that you choose as 
the cornerstone of your position. 
I know this seems very, very 
vague. 
 Let’s clarify using a simple 
analogy:
 Pretend the Resolution is: 
 Resolved: A cheeseburger ought 
to be valued above spaghetti. 
vs. 
 Before you can start arguing about 
which of these two yummies is the 
more valuable, you need to figure out 
what yardstick to use to measure 
them: Is it Good Taste? Nutritional 
Value? Ease of Preparation? Aesthetic 
Presentation? 
 The yardstick you choose is called your 
Value Premise. Naturally, you will 
choose the yardstick that you think will 
help you win! 
 If you're debating for the cheeseburger, 
you might take "Good Taste" as the 
most important value; if you're taking 
the side of spaghetti, you might claim 
that "Nutrition" must be the value 
by which to measure foods. 
 In this debate, the affirmative might 
claim that if food doesn't taste good, 
no one will eat it. The negative might 
claim that nutrition is prime and that if 
it's not good for the body, it's not good 
food. From this example, you can see 
that the debate should go back and 
forth.
 The value is achieved through certain 
Criteria. 
 After you state your value premise, 
you will name the 
criterion or criteria that you will use to 
achieve the value. 
 For example, for the value of 
Nutrition, your criterion might be the 
Four Food Groups, as set up by the 
U.S. Dept of Health, 
Education and Welfare. 
 Step Three: State arguments as main 
points. You will need two or three 
main points. The cheeseburger 
affirmative might be: 
 Value: Common Good 
 Criterion: Quality of Life 
 Contention One: The cheeseburger 
provides one of the basic needs of 
mankind, according to Maslow's 
hierarchy of basic needs. 
 Contention Two: The cheeseburger 
provides nutrition from all four food 
groups. 
 Contention Three: The 
cheeseburger provides advantages 
that the negative cannot provide, 
including portability and ease of use.
 The spaghetti negative 
might be: 
 Value: Life 
 Criterion: Nutrition 
 Contention One: 
Spaghetti provides a high 
standard of nutrition 
needed for life. 
 Contention Two: A 
cheeseburger is fat-filled 
and therefore fails to 
provide nutrition. 
 Step Four: Use evidence to 
back up each point. 
Evidence can consist of 
quotes, reasoning, or 
analogy. 
 Step Five: Find a good 
opening for the speech. 
This can be an apt quote, 
startling statistics, or 
interesting example. 
 Step Six: Time the speech. 
(Six minutes for the 
affirmative exactly. About 
three to four minutes for 
negative.)
 At the beginning of a round, they will 
post a listing of the debate rounds. 
This is called the Pairings. It will 
show your name, your opponent's 
name, your judge, the room number, 
and what side you are--aff or neg. 
 Write down your side and the room 
number. If you forget, you'll have to 
walk all the way back to the pairings. 
 Your audience is usually only one 
person--the JUDGE. If you don't make 
the judge respect you, you don't win 
the round. 
 Try to figure out what the judge will 
respect, and give it to her/him. Most 
judges like friendly, helpful kids who 
act as if they enjoy debating. Judges 
can be coaches, teachers, former 
debaters, community leaders, or 
parents. 
 Judging is hard. A judge has to listen 
carefully, take good notes, and 
sometimes give time signals all at the 
same time. 
 Just like students in a classroom , 
judges have other things on their minds 
that sometimes cause their attention to 
waiver. Therefore, plan to repeat 
yourself. Just because you said 
something once does not mean that 
the judge heard it. 
 The judge will fill out a BALLOT 
explaining the debate and why she/he 
made the decision about who won.
AC 
(6 min. 
speech) 
V: 
C: 
123 
NC 
(3-4 min. 
speech) 
V: 
C: 
12 
1AR 
Rebuild 
your case 
and 
answer 
attacks (2 
min.) 
NR 
Attack (2 
min.) 
Rebuild (2 
min.) 
AR 
Brief 
attack of 
NR 
position 
Brief 
support of 
Aff side 
Notes on 
cross ex 
period 
NC (2nd part) 
Attack on AC 
(line by line, 
3-4 min.) 
1AR 
Attack NC 
line by line (2 
min.) 
Crystallize 
the round 
Give VOTERS 
(2 min.) 
Crystallize 
Give VOTERS 
The judge and both debaters will outline everything that is said in the round. This outline is called 
in debate jargon a FLOW. The paper is called a FLOW CHART. Each person's flow chart will look 
a bit different, but it should be neat and easily read.
 When you go into the round, the 
judge will sit in a student desk 
in the center of the room. The 
affirmative will use a desk in the 
front left; the negative will use a 
desk in the front right, although 
this is not a rule. 
 You can rearrange the desks a 
bit for your comfort, just put them 
back before you leave the room. 
You can take a bottle of water, 
but no food or drinks. 
 Be pleasant and nice to your 
opponent, but be a bit suspicious 
until you know them. A few 
debaters can be sneaky and mean. 
Don't tell them anything that you 
don't want used against yourself or 
your team. 
 The judge will ask you for your 
school code, name, and what side 
you're on. The school code is 
assigned at registration. 
Sometimes they will want you to 
write this on the board; sometimes 
they will ask you to fill out the top 
of the ballot with this information; 
sometimes they will just ask you 
casually.
 You should already have 
preflowed your own speech 
on your flowchart before going 
into round. 
 In the few minutes before the 
round starts, you can organize 
your flowchart, take out any 
note cards you might need, 
and focus your attention on 
your particular stance. 
 The affirmative will stand, make 
eye contact with the judge to 
make certain he/she is ready, 
and read his/her speech. 
 Debaters typically keep their 
own time on a stop watch 
 At the end of the speech, 
he/she will say, "I now stand 
ready for cross examination." 
The negative 
will rise, stand beside the 
affirmative and begin to ask 
cross examination questions. 
 They do not look at each 
other. 
Instead they look at the judge.
 Each debater will have 4 minutes 
of Preparation Time that they can 
take whenever they like. 
 Usually the negative takes 2 minutes 
his/her cross-ex and then another 2 
minutes his second speech. 
 Usually the affirmative takes 2 
minutes before each of his/her 
rebuttal speeches. 
 The negative will then ROAD MAP 
for the judge what he/she intends to 
do. He/she will say, "I will first read 
the negative case and then attack 
my opponent's ridiculous position." 
(Not really-- don't really say 
"ridiculous"--just think it.) 
 Then he/she will read the four minute 
speech. Next he/she will say, "I will 
now turn to my opponent's case." 
Turning to the flow pad, he/she will 
attack all the points made by the 
affirmative, showing why his case is 
better. 
 Any points he fails to attack are 
considered dropped and are given to 
the other side. 
 MOST COMMON NOVICE ERROR: 
Failing to attack your opponent's case!
 Now the debate goes back and forth in the same manner. 
When it's over, shake hands with your opponent, thank 
the judge for judging and leave the room. 
 Both opponents should go out together. It is considered bad 
form for one to leave before the other. 
 The judge stays behind to make his decision (or s/he may 
give oral critiques). Be careful of what you say when you 
leave the room. If the judge hears you say that you think you 
lost, it might persuade him that you did. 
 Now you can go purchase some really 
“good” food at the snack bar!

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Advanced Debating Techniques
Advanced Debating TechniquesAdvanced Debating Techniques
Advanced Debating Techniques
Cherye alarc?
 
British parliamentary style debate
British parliamentary style debateBritish parliamentary style debate
British parliamentary style debate
Chokhuletz Batotoy
 
Account writing igcse
Account writing igcseAccount writing igcse
Account writing igcse
mafigueredo
 
Expressions for debate
Expressions for debateExpressions for debate
Expressions for debate
iolmrue873
 

Tendances (20)

Advanced Debating Techniques
Advanced Debating TechniquesAdvanced Debating Techniques
Advanced Debating Techniques
 
Argumentative Writing
Argumentative WritingArgumentative Writing
Argumentative Writing
 
British parliamentary style debate
British parliamentary style debateBritish parliamentary style debate
British parliamentary style debate
 
Grammar - Comma Use
Grammar - Comma UseGrammar - Comma Use
Grammar - Comma Use
 
Logos Ethos Pathos ppt
Logos Ethos Pathos pptLogos Ethos Pathos ppt
Logos Ethos Pathos ppt
 
Igcse reading paper
Igcse reading paperIgcse reading paper
Igcse reading paper
 
Methods of Characterization
Methods of CharacterizationMethods of Characterization
Methods of Characterization
 
Modifiers
ModifiersModifiers
Modifiers
 
Account writing igcse
Account writing igcseAccount writing igcse
Account writing igcse
 
Video news package start to finish
Video news package start to finishVideo news package start to finish
Video news package start to finish
 
Introduction to BP debate
Introduction to BP debateIntroduction to BP debate
Introduction to BP debate
 
Narrative Writing PPT
Narrative Writing PPTNarrative Writing PPT
Narrative Writing PPT
 
Expressions for debate
Expressions for debateExpressions for debate
Expressions for debate
 
Impromptu Speech
Impromptu SpeechImpromptu Speech
Impromptu Speech
 
Grammar articles
Grammar articlesGrammar articles
Grammar articles
 
Logos Ethos Pathos powerpoint
Logos Ethos Pathos powerpointLogos Ethos Pathos powerpoint
Logos Ethos Pathos powerpoint
 
Dialogue
DialogueDialogue
Dialogue
 
Quotation Marks and Quoted Material
Quotation Marks and Quoted MaterialQuotation Marks and Quoted Material
Quotation Marks and Quoted Material
 
Animal Farm-Propaganda Persuasion and Advertising Techniques
Animal Farm-Propaganda Persuasion and Advertising TechniquesAnimal Farm-Propaganda Persuasion and Advertising Techniques
Animal Farm-Propaganda Persuasion and Advertising Techniques
 
Introduction to debate
Introduction to debateIntroduction to debate
Introduction to debate
 

En vedette (14)

Lincoln Douglas Debate
Lincoln Douglas DebateLincoln Douglas Debate
Lincoln Douglas Debate
 
Lincoln douglas debates
Lincoln douglas debatesLincoln douglas debates
Lincoln douglas debates
 
Fullerenos y nanotecnologia
Fullerenos y nanotecnologiaFullerenos y nanotecnologia
Fullerenos y nanotecnologia
 
Debating
DebatingDebating
Debating
 
Civil War Lincoln Douglas
Civil War Lincoln DouglasCivil War Lincoln Douglas
Civil War Lincoln Douglas
 
Introduction to Congress
Introduction to CongressIntroduction to Congress
Introduction to Congress
 
2 Order Purposeofthe Speeches
2  Order Purposeofthe Speeches2  Order Purposeofthe Speeches
2 Order Purposeofthe Speeches
 
Student congress
Student congressStudent congress
Student congress
 
Rules of procedure_part_i_and_ii.ppt
Rules of procedure_part_i_and_ii.pptRules of procedure_part_i_and_ii.ppt
Rules of procedure_part_i_and_ii.ppt
 
Assignment on pedagogy debates
Assignment on pedagogy debatesAssignment on pedagogy debates
Assignment on pedagogy debates
 
Introduction to parliamentary debate
Introduction to parliamentary debateIntroduction to parliamentary debate
Introduction to parliamentary debate
 
Speeches
SpeechesSpeeches
Speeches
 
Abraham Lincoln PPT 2
Abraham Lincoln PPT 2Abraham Lincoln PPT 2
Abraham Lincoln PPT 2
 
8th ss events leading to civil war
8th ss events leading to civil war8th ss events leading to civil war
8th ss events leading to civil war
 

Similaire à Lincoln douglas debate intro

step by step to begin the comunications ya
step by step to begin the comunications yastep by step to begin the comunications ya
step by step to begin the comunications ya
findi2
 
5-9-19 Debate.ppt
5-9-19 Debate.ppt5-9-19 Debate.ppt
5-9-19 Debate.ppt
DaVuthy1
 
2015 Judges Training final
2015 Judges Training final 2015 Judges Training final
2015 Judges Training final
Meagan Kowaleski
 
Lecture on writing argumentative essays ppt
Lecture on writing argumentative essays   pptLecture on writing argumentative essays   ppt
Lecture on writing argumentative essays ppt
Vu Phu
 

Similaire à Lincoln douglas debate intro (20)

Oregon Oxford Debate Form.pptx
Oregon Oxford Debate Form.pptxOregon Oxford Debate Form.pptx
Oregon Oxford Debate Form.pptx
 
Basic Debating Skills (2)2.ppt
Basic Debating Skills (2)2.pptBasic Debating Skills (2)2.ppt
Basic Debating Skills (2)2.ppt
 
Introduction to Basic Debating Skills.ppt
Introduction to Basic Debating Skills.pptIntroduction to Basic Debating Skills.ppt
Introduction to Basic Debating Skills.ppt
 
Debate 07 08
Debate 07 08Debate 07 08
Debate 07 08
 
Huckabee debate notes and format 3 w rubric (2)
Huckabee   debate notes and format 3 w rubric (2)Huckabee   debate notes and format 3 w rubric (2)
Huckabee debate notes and format 3 w rubric (2)
 
Debate
DebateDebate
Debate
 
A brief introduction to debate skill for ENG154
A brief introduction to debate skill for ENG154A brief introduction to debate skill for ENG154
A brief introduction to debate skill for ENG154
 
Materi debat 1
Materi debat 1Materi debat 1
Materi debat 1
 
Rules and Guidelines on Debate Competition
Rules and Guidelines on Debate CompetitionRules and Guidelines on Debate Competition
Rules and Guidelines on Debate Competition
 
Capital Conference Intro to LD
Capital Conference Intro to LD Capital Conference Intro to LD
Capital Conference Intro to LD
 
step by step to begin the comunications ya
step by step to begin the comunications yastep by step to begin the comunications ya
step by step to begin the comunications ya
 
Debate 101 oktafia
Debate 101   oktafiaDebate 101   oktafia
Debate 101 oktafia
 
Presentation on Debate
Presentation on DebatePresentation on Debate
Presentation on Debate
 
BASIC DEBATING SKILLS
BASIC DEBATING SKILLSBASIC DEBATING SKILLS
BASIC DEBATING SKILLS
 
Debate materials Opinion & thoughts.pptx
Debate materials Opinion & thoughts.pptxDebate materials Opinion & thoughts.pptx
Debate materials Opinion & thoughts.pptx
 
Ejved adj seminar
Ejved adj seminarEjved adj seminar
Ejved adj seminar
 
5-9-19 Debate.ppt
5-9-19 Debate.ppt5-9-19 Debate.ppt
5-9-19 Debate.ppt
 
5-9-19 Debate.ppt
5-9-19 Debate.ppt5-9-19 Debate.ppt
5-9-19 Debate.ppt
 
2015 Judges Training final
2015 Judges Training final 2015 Judges Training final
2015 Judges Training final
 
Lecture on writing argumentative essays ppt
Lecture on writing argumentative essays   pptLecture on writing argumentative essays   ppt
Lecture on writing argumentative essays ppt
 

Plus de dhohnhol (20)

Unit 14 1980's and modern era part1
Unit 14 1980's and modern era part1Unit 14 1980's and modern era part1
Unit 14 1980's and modern era part1
 
Maxwell 17e ppt_ch01
Maxwell 17e ppt_ch01Maxwell 17e ppt_ch01
Maxwell 17e ppt_ch01
 
Tuttle twinspencil (1)
Tuttle twinspencil (1)Tuttle twinspencil (1)
Tuttle twinspencil (1)
 
Admin day
Admin dayAdmin day
Admin day
 
Proclamation 2015 training
Proclamation 2015 training Proclamation 2015 training
Proclamation 2015 training
 
Bianco Chapter 4
Bianco Chapter 4Bianco Chapter 4
Bianco Chapter 4
 
Bianco Federalism PPT
Bianco Federalism PPTBianco Federalism PPT
Bianco Federalism PPT
 
Federalism PPT
Federalism PPTFederalism PPT
Federalism PPT
 
Practicum Presentation
Practicum PresentationPracticum Presentation
Practicum Presentation
 
Apa format style power point
Apa format style power pointApa format style power point
Apa format style power point
 
Chapter 11 Presentation
Chapter 11 PresentationChapter 11 Presentation
Chapter 11 Presentation
 
group ten ppp
group ten pppgroup ten ppp
group ten ppp
 
Chapter 9 group presentation
Chapter 9 group presentationChapter 9 group presentation
Chapter 9 group presentation
 
Chapter 8 Teaxs Politics
Chapter 8 Teaxs PoliticsChapter 8 Teaxs Politics
Chapter 8 Teaxs Politics
 
Chapter 7 state and local
Chapter 7 state and localChapter 7 state and local
Chapter 7 state and local
 
Chapter 5 interests groups (1)
Chapter 5 interests groups (1)Chapter 5 interests groups (1)
Chapter 5 interests groups (1)
 
Kw2 ch04 final
Kw2 ch04 finalKw2 ch04 final
Kw2 ch04 final
 
Kw2 ch04 final
Kw2 ch04 finalKw2 ch04 final
Kw2 ch04 final
 
Group 4_Political Parties_Ch 4
Group 4_Political Parties_Ch 4Group 4_Political Parties_Ch 4
Group 4_Political Parties_Ch 4
 
Krugman ch 3
Krugman ch 3Krugman ch 3
Krugman ch 3
 

Dernier

The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
PECB
 
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
QucHHunhnh
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
kauryashika82
 

Dernier (20)

The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
 
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
 
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-IIFood Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
 
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxUnit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
 
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
 
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan FellowsOn National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
 
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
 
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDMeasures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
 
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptxRole Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
 
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural Resources
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural ResourcesEnergy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural Resources
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural Resources
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 

Lincoln douglas debate intro

  • 2.  Lincoln-Douglas Debate is a VALUE debate, meaning it is a debate about what ought to be rather than specific policy.  It is usually a topic regarding the conflict between the rights of the individual opposed to the rights of the larger society.  The topic changes every two months; it is chosen by the National Forensic League.
  • 3.  A round of Lincoln-Douglas Debate is the debate of one person from one school arguing against a person from a dif ferent school.  At a debate tournament, each student will debate at least 3-4 times. The larger the tournament, the more rounds will be guaranteed.
  • 4.  During a typical tournament, debaters will argue both sides of the topic.  Usually, each debater will be assigned the affirmative side for two rounds and the negative side on two other rounds.  A Lincoln-Douglas debate round lasts about 45 minutes. The times for the various speeches are very structured, as are the purposes of the speeches.
  • 5.  6 minute Affirmative Constructive (AC)  3 minute Negative Cross Examination  7 minute Negative Constructive/Rebuttal (NC)  3 minute Affirmative Cross Examination (questions/answers)  4 minute Affirmative Reconstructive/Rebuttal (1AR)  6 minute Negative Reconstructive/Rebuttal (NR)  3 minute Affirmative Reconstructive/Rebuttal/Crystallization (2AR)  It helps to memorize: "6 - 3 - 7 - 3 - 4 - 6 - 3"
  • 6.  6 minute Affirmative Constructive. This speech is prepared ahead, rehearsed and should be perfectly timed. It is a presentation of the affirmative's position and establishes his/her stance.  3 minute Negative Cross Examination. The Negative asks for clarification, asks for repetition of certain points, and tries to set up the affirmative to admit damaging information.  7 minute Negative Constructive/ Rebuttal. This speech really has two parts: The first part is a written, rehearsed speech that builds the negative case and is about four minutes long. In the second part, the negative must attack his/her opponent's points. The attack takes the last three minutes.  3 minute Affirmative Cross Examination. Now it's the affirmative's turn to question the negative, asking for clarification and trying to lead him/her down an ivy-covered path to destruction.  4 minute Affirmative Reconstructive/Rebuttal. The affirmative doesn't have much time here, so she/he has to talk fast. She/he must go down the flow (outline) of the argumentation, hitting any arguments against her/his own case and then attacking each of her/his opponent's arguments. Again, two parts: Rebuild and Attack.  6 minute Negative Reconstructive/ Rebuttal. This speech has three parts: Rebuild, Attack and Crystallize: about two minutes to rebuild any arguments against the negative's own case; two minutes to attack the affirmative; and two minutes to summarize the voting issues for the judge.  3 minute Affirmative Reconstructive/Rebuttal. This is a very short speech--time only to argue the most important points, attack the negative's voting issues, and crystallize the affirmative's own voting points.
  • 7.  Our Team subscribes to publishers who create DEBATE BRIEFS  A Brief is a collection of evidence, arguments, current topic analysis, definitions, etc.  Briefs are helpful, but remember that other teams may also have these collections  Evidence can also be found on the internet, but only use CREDIBLE sources (NY Times, WA Post, etc.)
  • 8.  You will need to write TWO speeches: the affirmative (6 min.) that says that the resolution is true and the negative (3-4 min) that says that the resolution is false.  You will use your affirmative speech in two of your debates and your negative speech in the other two debates.
  • 9.  Step One: The Resolution. The resolution is a statement of the topic of the debate. The entire debate is a test of the validity of this statement. Therefore, wording and semantics are crucial. Each important word must be defined from different angles.  After a brief opening paragraph using the resolution as the thesis statement, or in the case of the negative, its antithesis, you will state your definitions.  Step Two: The Value Premise.  Remember that we said that Lincoln-Douglas Debate is a VALUE debate about what ought to be, right?  Each debate speech will center on a value that you choose as the cornerstone of your position. I know this seems very, very vague.  Let’s clarify using a simple analogy:
  • 10.  Pretend the Resolution is:  Resolved: A cheeseburger ought to be valued above spaghetti. vs.  Before you can start arguing about which of these two yummies is the more valuable, you need to figure out what yardstick to use to measure them: Is it Good Taste? Nutritional Value? Ease of Preparation? Aesthetic Presentation?  The yardstick you choose is called your Value Premise. Naturally, you will choose the yardstick that you think will help you win!  If you're debating for the cheeseburger, you might take "Good Taste" as the most important value; if you're taking the side of spaghetti, you might claim that "Nutrition" must be the value by which to measure foods.  In this debate, the affirmative might claim that if food doesn't taste good, no one will eat it. The negative might claim that nutrition is prime and that if it's not good for the body, it's not good food. From this example, you can see that the debate should go back and forth.
  • 11.  The value is achieved through certain Criteria.  After you state your value premise, you will name the criterion or criteria that you will use to achieve the value.  For example, for the value of Nutrition, your criterion might be the Four Food Groups, as set up by the U.S. Dept of Health, Education and Welfare.  Step Three: State arguments as main points. You will need two or three main points. The cheeseburger affirmative might be:  Value: Common Good  Criterion: Quality of Life  Contention One: The cheeseburger provides one of the basic needs of mankind, according to Maslow's hierarchy of basic needs.  Contention Two: The cheeseburger provides nutrition from all four food groups.  Contention Three: The cheeseburger provides advantages that the negative cannot provide, including portability and ease of use.
  • 12.  The spaghetti negative might be:  Value: Life  Criterion: Nutrition  Contention One: Spaghetti provides a high standard of nutrition needed for life.  Contention Two: A cheeseburger is fat-filled and therefore fails to provide nutrition.  Step Four: Use evidence to back up each point. Evidence can consist of quotes, reasoning, or analogy.  Step Five: Find a good opening for the speech. This can be an apt quote, startling statistics, or interesting example.  Step Six: Time the speech. (Six minutes for the affirmative exactly. About three to four minutes for negative.)
  • 13.  At the beginning of a round, they will post a listing of the debate rounds. This is called the Pairings. It will show your name, your opponent's name, your judge, the room number, and what side you are--aff or neg.  Write down your side and the room number. If you forget, you'll have to walk all the way back to the pairings.  Your audience is usually only one person--the JUDGE. If you don't make the judge respect you, you don't win the round.  Try to figure out what the judge will respect, and give it to her/him. Most judges like friendly, helpful kids who act as if they enjoy debating. Judges can be coaches, teachers, former debaters, community leaders, or parents.  Judging is hard. A judge has to listen carefully, take good notes, and sometimes give time signals all at the same time.  Just like students in a classroom , judges have other things on their minds that sometimes cause their attention to waiver. Therefore, plan to repeat yourself. Just because you said something once does not mean that the judge heard it.  The judge will fill out a BALLOT explaining the debate and why she/he made the decision about who won.
  • 14. AC (6 min. speech) V: C: 123 NC (3-4 min. speech) V: C: 12 1AR Rebuild your case and answer attacks (2 min.) NR Attack (2 min.) Rebuild (2 min.) AR Brief attack of NR position Brief support of Aff side Notes on cross ex period NC (2nd part) Attack on AC (line by line, 3-4 min.) 1AR Attack NC line by line (2 min.) Crystallize the round Give VOTERS (2 min.) Crystallize Give VOTERS The judge and both debaters will outline everything that is said in the round. This outline is called in debate jargon a FLOW. The paper is called a FLOW CHART. Each person's flow chart will look a bit different, but it should be neat and easily read.
  • 15.  When you go into the round, the judge will sit in a student desk in the center of the room. The affirmative will use a desk in the front left; the negative will use a desk in the front right, although this is not a rule.  You can rearrange the desks a bit for your comfort, just put them back before you leave the room. You can take a bottle of water, but no food or drinks.  Be pleasant and nice to your opponent, but be a bit suspicious until you know them. A few debaters can be sneaky and mean. Don't tell them anything that you don't want used against yourself or your team.  The judge will ask you for your school code, name, and what side you're on. The school code is assigned at registration. Sometimes they will want you to write this on the board; sometimes they will ask you to fill out the top of the ballot with this information; sometimes they will just ask you casually.
  • 16.  You should already have preflowed your own speech on your flowchart before going into round.  In the few minutes before the round starts, you can organize your flowchart, take out any note cards you might need, and focus your attention on your particular stance.  The affirmative will stand, make eye contact with the judge to make certain he/she is ready, and read his/her speech.  Debaters typically keep their own time on a stop watch  At the end of the speech, he/she will say, "I now stand ready for cross examination." The negative will rise, stand beside the affirmative and begin to ask cross examination questions.  They do not look at each other. Instead they look at the judge.
  • 17.  Each debater will have 4 minutes of Preparation Time that they can take whenever they like.  Usually the negative takes 2 minutes his/her cross-ex and then another 2 minutes his second speech.  Usually the affirmative takes 2 minutes before each of his/her rebuttal speeches.  The negative will then ROAD MAP for the judge what he/she intends to do. He/she will say, "I will first read the negative case and then attack my opponent's ridiculous position." (Not really-- don't really say "ridiculous"--just think it.)  Then he/she will read the four minute speech. Next he/she will say, "I will now turn to my opponent's case." Turning to the flow pad, he/she will attack all the points made by the affirmative, showing why his case is better.  Any points he fails to attack are considered dropped and are given to the other side.  MOST COMMON NOVICE ERROR: Failing to attack your opponent's case!
  • 18.  Now the debate goes back and forth in the same manner. When it's over, shake hands with your opponent, thank the judge for judging and leave the room.  Both opponents should go out together. It is considered bad form for one to leave before the other.  The judge stays behind to make his decision (or s/he may give oral critiques). Be careful of what you say when you leave the room. If the judge hears you say that you think you lost, it might persuade him that you did.  Now you can go purchase some really “good” food at the snack bar!