An old presentation of mine about using Web 2.0 in teaching English.

1. Web .0 Web:
Spinning a New Thread
Ismail Fayed
ismailfayed@yahoo.com
Sunday, 11 February 2007, 01:00:pm

2. Overview
• PLLE.. new trends and potentials
• Web 2.0 technologies
• Web 2.0 for educators
• A gateway for learner’s autonomy and folksonomy..
2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 2

3. The Internet Now and Before..
The only thing that I learned recently is 5 Yrs ago just a resource for
using the open source systems on the teaching only, but now it’s
internet which opened a lot of horizons related to everything around
for interacting and communicating me. It’s part of my daily life.
knowledge and software with people Khawla Tarish (2007)
around the world.
Rana Kais (2007)
5 years ago the internet to me was for information, music and emails.
Today I use it for shopping, doing research, studying, shopping,
getting movies, communicating, watching movies, playing chess,
letters, ....... almost every thing. I now travel with a laptop.
Murray Grant (2007)
2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 3

4. What’s Web 2.0?
On Sep. 2005, Tim O’Reilly
wrote apiece summarizing
the subject. The min-map
pictured here (constructed by
Markus Angermeier on Nov.
11, 2005) sums up the
memes of Web 2.0, with
example-sites and services
attached.
2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 4

5. What’s Web 2.0?
3 Minutes
Flexbeta, (2006) “What is Web 2.0?”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LzQIUANnHc
2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 5

6. Examples
• R/A: Rich Turn-up Appications turning the data
from the desktop to the browser (flash, Ajax)
• SOA: Service-Oriented Architecture (Feeds, RSS,
Web-services, Mash-ups)
• The Social Web: by the help of the end-user.
user
The user is more of a participant.. (tagging – wiki –
blogging – podcasting)
2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 6

7. Web 2.0 for Educators
• Collaborative, social, and personal..
The Social Web provides: A folksonomy is an Internet-based information retrieval
methodology consisting of collaboratively generated, open-
ended labels that categorize content such as Web pages,
• Feedback online photographs, and Web links.
• Interaction A folksonomy is most notably contrasted from a taxonomy in
• “data” that the authors of the labeling system are often the main
users (and sometimes originators) of the content to which the
labels are applied. The labels are commonly known as tags
and the labeling process is called tagging…
In contrast to professionally developed taxonomies with
controlled vocabularies, folksonomies are unsystematic and,
from an information scientist's point of view, undependable and
inconsistent; however, for Internet users, they dramatically
lower content categorization costs because there is no
hierarchically organized nomenclature to learn. One simply
makes tags up on the fly
2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 7

8. What’s Web 2.0?
2/11/2007 Web 2.0Ismail Fayed
visual summary, by O’Reilly (2006) 8

9. What’s Web 2.0?
2 Minutes
Web 2.0 Ad!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmo1ef7tVso
2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 9

10. Internet Evolution
Today's Internet looks quite different from what many investors pictured
just five years ago. Thomas Baker (1999)
Web 1.0 Web 2.0
DoubleClick --> Google AdSense
Ofoto --> Flickr
Akamai --> BitTorrent
mp3.com --> Napster
Britannica Online --> Wikipedia
personal websites --> blogging
evite --> upcoming.org and EVDB
domain name speculation --> search engine optimization
page views --> cost per click
screen scraping --> web services
publishing --> participation
content management systems --> wikis
directories (taxonomy) --> tagging ("folksonomy")
stickiness --> Syndication
2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 10

11. Features of the .0..
Web 1.0 Web 2.0
Examples of services available
Static Dynamic
Push Push/ Pull
Text blogs, wikis, dictionaries,
Read Only Read/ Write
Voice messaging boards, chat,
voice/ sound Client/ Server Peer-to-Peer
SMS
Video messages, flash videos, Taxonomy Folksonomy
video
online TV, iPods Consumerism Participation
Google.com, kartoo.com, Walled garden Open territory
search
pagebull.com
Teacher-administered Learner directed
Community
groups, forums, projects, wikis Highly structured Loosely structured
building
Institutional personal
Institutional learner Free range learner
Limited Few limited
2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 11

12. What is Web 2.0?
3 Minutes
Web 2.0 Insights
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcIDhJsOl0A
2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 12

13. What’s Web 2.0?
5 Minutes
Jutecht, (2006) “Web 2.0”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsa5ZTRJQ5w
2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 13

14. What’s Web 2.0?
5 Minutes
ariosamba, (2006) “What Are Mash-ups”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9sENSA_sjI
2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 14

15. Web 2.0 for Teachers and
Educators
oice
g:V
kin ards
Spea Bo
Vaestro.com©, an example of Voice Messaging Boards
2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 15

16. Web 2.0 for Teachers and
Educators
oice
:V
ing rds
eak oa
Sp B
Tackpack.com ©, an example of Voice Messaging Boards
2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 16

17. Web 2.0 for Teachers and
Educators
g
nin
Liste
BBC.co.uk ©, an example of News Live radio and TV
2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 17

18. Web 2.0 for Teachers and
Educators
Onlin
e Co u
r
Comm ses and
unitie
s
Elearning 4 kids ©, an example of News Live radio and TV
2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 18

19. Web 2.0 for Teachers and
Educators
Reading
Writing
Research
Discussions
Blogspot.com ©, an example of a class blog
2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 19

20. Web 2.0 for Teachers and
Educators
Se a
rch
topi for n
cs o ew
r the
mes
Page bull.com ©, an example of a live dynamic search engine
2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 20

21. Web 2.0 for Teachers and
Educators
7 Minutes
Stanley’s “Web 2.0 for Language Learners” Video
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7295619536620540579
&q=Web+2.0+for+teachers
2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 21

22. References
• Ariosamba, (2006). “What Are Mash-ups” Available from: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9sENSA_sjI> [Accessed 1
Feb. 2007].
• Baker, T. (1999). “TIAC White Paper on: Appropriate Technology for Digital Libraries” Available from:
<http://www.tiac.or.th/tiacweb/Baker/Title.html> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].
• Campell, A. Rip, Mix, and Burn: creating Personal Language Learning Environments to enhance EFL classes. Available from:
<http://e-poche.net/?page_id=69> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].
•D’Souza, Q. (2006). “Web 2.0 Ideas for Educators: A Guide to Rss and More” Available from:
<http://www.teachinghacks.com/audio/100ideasWeb2educators.pdf> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].
• Flexbeta, (2006). “What is Web 2.0?” Available from: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LzQIUANnHc> [Accessed 1 Feb.
2007].
• Good, R. (2006). “Web 2.0 Remixed” Available from: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcIDhJsOl0A> [Accessed 1 Feb.
2007].
• Graham (2006). “Web 2.0 & Language Learning” Available from:
<http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7295619536620540579&q=Web+2.0+for+teachers> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].
• Jukes, I. (2006). “Web 2.0 Tools for Educators” Available from:
<http://21cif.imsa.edu/resources/links/v1n5_Web2.0_links.html> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].
• Jutecht, (2006). “Web 2.0” Available from: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsa5ZTRJQ5w> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].
• Kitched, D. & Tobler W. (2006). “Hak.5 Microshaft Web 2.0 Framework” Available from:
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmo1ef7tVso > [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].
• MacManus, R. (2005). “What’s Web 2.0” Available from: <http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?p=5> [Accessed 1 Feb.
2007].
• O’Reilly, T. (2005). “Not 2.0?”. Available from: <http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2005/08/not_20.html> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].
• O’Reilly, T. (2005). “What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software”. Available
from: <http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].
• Wikipedia’s definition of “Web 2.0”. Available from: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].
• Wikiperdia’s definition of “Folksonomy”. Available from: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folksonomy > [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].
2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 22

23. 2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 23