Industrial capture cost: estimation methods and metrics (introduction) - Simon Bennett, IEA

•

1 j'aime•665 vues

Global CCS Institute

A presentation from the 2013 CCS Costs Workshop.

Économie & finance Technologie Business

Session 2 - Industrial capture cost: estimation
methods and metrics
CCS Cost Workshop, Paris; 6-7 November 2013
Simon Bennett, Chair

© OECD/IEA 2013

IEA reading list on CCS in industry

© OECD/IEA 2013

IEA abatement cost “estimates” 2011
High-purity

Biomass conversion

Cement

Iron and steel

Refinery

0

50

100

150

200

Cost of abatement (USD/tCO2 avoided)

The sectors covered will show a wide range of cost of abatement, from under 30USD/t to over 150USD/t
© OECD/IEA 2013

Source: IEA report to the Clean Energy Ministerial 2013

Update on avoidance costs 2013

Cost estimates vary widely between sites and within sites. Consensus is still evolving...
© OECD/IEA 2013

What we need to improve cost estimates
 We need to improve comparability of estimates for

industrial applications, as in power
 Setting boundaries around capture processes on sites
 Approaches to estimating production costs (or NPV, etc.) in
different sectors (equivalent to LCOE)
 Use common terminology for citing costs and inputs
 Allocation of costs across multiple product streams
 Allocation of costs across multiple processes onsite
 Baselines for estimating CO2 avoidance costs
 Incorporation of relevant risks
© OECD/IEA 2013

Contenu connexe

En vedette

Estimation of Signal Models for Aerospace and Industrial Applications slides

Anirban Krishna Bhattacharyya

LeanCOST: the smartest costing solution

Margherita Peruzzini

Chapter2 -cost_estimation_umy_sep2011

Purba Jati

Software Cost Estimation in Software Engineering SE23

koolkampus

Lecture # 6 cost estimation ii

Bich Lien Pham

55811936 product-costing-cost-estimation-in-sap

Pepa Pencheva

Lecture # 5 cost estimation i

Bich Lien Pham

Software cost estimation project

Shashank Puppala

En vedette (8)

Estimation of Signal Models for Aerospace and Industrial Applications slides

LeanCOST: the smartest costing solution

Chapter2 -cost_estimation_umy_sep2011

Software Cost Estimation in Software Engineering SE23

Lecture # 6 cost estimation ii

55811936 product-costing-cost-estimation-in-sap

Lecture # 5 cost estimation i

Software cost estimation project

Similaire à Industrial capture cost: estimation methods and metrics (introduction) - Simon Bennett, IEA

Cleantechnol 03-00046-v2

kyrilluskameel

SCOE: Society's Cost of Electricity: How society should decide on the optimal...

Christoph Wiard Neemann

GRI Conference- 28 May - Busch- Carbon Performance and Measurement panel

Global Reporting Initiative

Juho Lipponen - CCS & the global climate agenda

Global CCS Institute

Francesco Vona

Structuralpolicyanalysis

Impacts of CO2 tax on Italian Economy

Mostafa Deldoost

With depleting pace of natural energy resources and pollution in the environment it is necessary to reduce the amount of energy consumption. On the other hand price of energy is increasing due to likely increase in oil prices. So it is necessary to see the effect of energy cost in total machining cost. In the present work conventional cost equation is modified to consider the energy cost as variable of v, f and d instead of energy cost as constant in conventional cost equation. Different costs are compared by taking the particular value of parameters v, f and d. It was found that energy as a variable cost have considerable portion in total machining cost.

Modification of Cost Equation for Optimization of Cutting Parameters in Turni...

IJLT EMAS

Emission Statement - Technology Design - Issue 3

Grant Budge

dimiz_research_expertise_2015

Zinaida Dimitrijevic

Energy benoit hood(iea) ccxg gf sep2014

OECD Environment

s1230460 Conference Paper

Tommy Reynolds

Emissions Trading Media Briefing February 2009

David Hone

In a joint effort, CDP, the UN Global Compact, WRI and WWF launched the Science Based Targets initiative to engage companies in setting ambitious GHG reduction targets as a response to the urgent call of the IPCC to decarbonize the economy. Ecofys was commissioned as consultancy partner to support the development of a new methodology to guide companies in setting science-based targets. In this webinar Giel Linthorst will present the developed methodology, called the Sectoral Decarbonization Approach (SDA). Next to this, he will also present the results of applying this SDA-methodology to various multinational companies and highlight some specific cases.

GHG Science based targets

Leonardo ENERGY

This application note presents and illustrates key elements associated with the economic analysis of wind energy projects and is aimed at municipalities, cooperatives, investors, and companies that want to install wind parks on their premises. Over the past decade, wind energy capacity has increased significantly, mainly driven by national support schemes. This enabled technological improvements and cost reductions per unit of installed power. More recently, with the global financial crisis (and the associated tight financing conditions) behind us, appetite for wind investments has increased. According to WindEurope, wind energy investments in Europe increased by 5% in 2016 with respect to 2015 (totaling €27.5bn of new investments in 2016). Wind energy investments accounted for nearly 90% of the new renewable energy finance in 2016, compared to approximately 70% in 2015. Wind investments can provide an attractive risk/return profile, as well as other potential benefits such as risk diversification and a hedge against rising fuel prices. Currently, revenues from wind projects are usually based on PPA revenues plus subsidies, which tend to be market-based (e.g. a premium over a market price). However, the characteristics of recent wind energy auctions and Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) being closed worldwide show that in some cases wind is already cost-competitive with traditional energy sources. The viability of wind projects will depend upon a business model based on a stable scheme that enables long-term predictable revenue streams, regardless of whether it is market driven (PPA) or politically driven (FiT). Financing costs are highly dependent upon the stability of the regulatory framework (the more stable, the lower the financing costs) and the risk profile of the investment (financing cost decreases with increasing accuracy in estimates, better risk management, more industry experience, and more standardization). In all cases, an economic analysis of the investment opportunity is required before undertaking the project. Several financial indicators are useful for assessing the viability of the project, including IRR, NPV, and payback period, among others. Moreover, it is advised that conservative assumptions be used in the financial model and sensitivity analysis be performed to consider the impact of different scenarios on profitability. Even though a wind energy investment is exposed to different risks (technical, legal, and financial, among others), there are many ways these risks can be reduced throughout the lifetime of the project. For instance, technology risk can be reduced by installing proven wind turbines, relying on warranties, and performing preventive maintenance.

Economic analysis of wind projects

Leonardo ENERGY

Implementing Agreement for Co-operation in the Research, Development and Depl...

SustainableEnergyAut

Keynote: ROADMAP FOR NET ZERO EMISSIONS WITH KNOWN TECHNOLOGIES

The Sustainable Energy Planning research group at Aalborg University

Nobuo Tanaka, IEA: Cost-Effective Carbon Reduction

Alliance To Save Energy

Leveling the playing field - the economics of electricity generation in Europe

David Owain Clubb

Bvga hundleby icoe 2016

BVG Associates

Emissions Trading - More Detail

David Hone

Similaire à Industrial capture cost: estimation methods and metrics (introduction) - Simon Bennett, IEA (20)

Cleantechnol 03-00046-v2

SCOE: Society's Cost of Electricity: How society should decide on the optimal...

GRI Conference- 28 May - Busch- Carbon Performance and Measurement panel

Juho Lipponen - CCS & the global climate agenda

Francesco Vona

Impacts of CO2 tax on Italian Economy

Modification of Cost Equation for Optimization of Cutting Parameters in Turni...

Emission Statement - Technology Design - Issue 3

dimiz_research_expertise_2015

Energy benoit hood(iea) ccxg gf sep2014

s1230460 Conference Paper

Emissions Trading Media Briefing February 2009

GHG Science based targets

Economic analysis of wind projects

Implementing Agreement for Co-operation in the Research, Development and Depl...

Keynote: ROADMAP FOR NET ZERO EMISSIONS WITH KNOWN TECHNOLOGIES

Nobuo Tanaka, IEA: Cost-Effective Carbon Reduction

Leveling the playing field - the economics of electricity generation in Europe

Bvga hundleby icoe 2016

Emissions Trading - More Detail

Plus de Global CCS Institute

The Global CCS Institute hosted the final webinar of its "Telling the Norwegian CCS Story" series which presented Northern Lights. This project is part of the Norwegian full-scale CCS project which will include the capture of CO2 at two industrial facilities (cement and waste-to-energy plants), transport and permanent storage of CO2 in a geological reservoir on the Norwegian Continental Shelf. Northern Lights aims to establish an open access CO2 transport and storage service for Europe. It is the first integrated commercial project of its kind able to receive CO2 from a variety of industrial sources. The project is led by Equinor with two partners Shell and Total. Northern Lights aims to drive the development of CCS in Europe and globally.

Northern Lights: A European CO2 transport and storage project

Global CCS Institute

Webinar: Policy priorities to incentivise large scale deployment of CCS

Global CCS Institute

Telling the Norwegian CCS Story | PART II: CCS: the path to a sustainable and...

Global CCS Institute

In 2018, the Norwegian government announced its decision to continue the planning of a demonstration project for CO2 capture, transport and storage. This webinar focuses on the Fortum Oslo Varme CCS project. This is one of the two industrial CO2 sources in the Norwegian full-scale project. At their waste-to-energy plant at Klemetsrud in Oslo, Fortum Oslo Varme produces electricity and district heating for the Oslo region by incinerating waste. Its waste-to-energy plant is one of the largest land-based sources of CO2 emissions in Norway, counting for about 20 % of the city of Oslo’s total emissions. The CCS project in Oslo is an important step towards a sustainable waste system and the creation of a circular economy. It will be the first energy recovery installation for waste disposal treatment with full-scale CCS. Fortum Oslo Varme has understood the enormous potential for the development of a CCS industry in the waste-to-energy industry. The company is working to capture 90 % of its CO2 emissions, the equivalent of 400 000 tons of CO2 per year. This project will open new opportunities to reduce emissions from the waste sector in Norway and globally. Carbon capture from waste incineration can remove over 90 million tons of CO2 per year from existing plants in Europe. There is high global transfer value and high interest in the industry for the project in Oslo. The waste treated consists of almost 60 % biological carbon. Carbon capture at waste-to-energy plants will therefore be so-called BIO-CCS (i.e. CCS from the incineration of organic waste, thereby removing the CO2 from the natural cycle). Find out more about the project by listening to our webinar.

Telling the Norwegian CCS Story | PART I: CCS: the path to sustainable and em...

Global CCS Institute

Industrial sectors such as steel, cement, iron, and chemicals production are responsible for over 20 percent of global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. To be on track to meet greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets established as part of the Paris Climate Accord, all sectors must find solutions to rapidly decarbonize, and carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology is the only path for energy-intensive industries. This webinar will explore how one country, Norway, is working to realize a large-scale Full Chain CCS project, where it is planning to apply carbon capture technology to several industrial facilities. This unique project explores capturing CO2 from three different industrial facilities - an ammonia production plant, a waste-to-energy plant, and a cement production facility. Captured CO2 will be then transported by ship to a permanent off-shore storage site operated as part of a collaboration between Statoil, Total, and Shell. When operational, Norway Full Chain CCS will capture and permanently store up to 1.5 million tons of CO2 per year. During this webinar, Michael Carpenter, Senior Adviser at Gassnova, will provide an overview of the Norway Full Chain CCS, and discuss the value that Norway aims to derive from it. The key stakeholders working on this exciting project, and how they cooperate, will be also discussed. Gassnova is a Norwegian state enterprise focusing on CCS technology, which manages the Norway Full Chain CCS project.

Decarbonizing Industry Using Carbon Capture: Norway Full Chain CCS

Global CCS Institute

The CO2StCap project is a four year initiative carried out by industry and academic partners with the aim of reducing capture costs from CO2 intensive industries (more info here). The project, led by Tel-Tek, is based on the idea that cost reduction is possible by capturing only a share of the CO2emissions from a given facility, instead of striving for maximized capture rates. This can be done in multiple ways, for instance by capturing only from the largest CO2 sources at individual multi-stack sites utilising cheap waste heat or adapting the capture volumes to seasonal changes in operations. The main focus of this research is to perform techno-economic analyses for multiple partial CO2 capture concepts in order to identify economic optimums between cost and volumes captured. In total for four different case studies are developed for cement, iron & steel, pulp & paper and ferroalloys industries. The first part of the webinar gave an overview of the project with insights into the cost estimation method used. The second part presented the iron & steel industry case study based on the Lulea site in Sweden, for which waste-heat mapping methodology has been used to assess the potential for partial capture via MEA-absorption. Capture costs for different CO2 sources were compared and discussed, demonstrating the viability of partial capture in an integrated steelworks. Webinar presenters included Ragnhild Skagestad, senior researcher at Tel-Tek; Maximilian Biermann, PhD student at Division of Energy Technology, Chalmers University of Technology and Maria Sundqvist, research engineer at the department of process integration at Swerea MEFOS.

Cutting Cost of CO2 Capture in Process Industry (CO2stCap) Project overview &...

Global CCS Institute

Global CCS Institute Presentation

Global CCS Institute

ION Engineering Presentation

Global CCS Institute

Membrane Technology & Research (MTR) Presentation

Global CCS Institute

Mission Innovation aims to reinvigorate and accelerate global clean energy innovation with the objective to make clean energy widely affordable. Through a series of Innovation Challenges, member countries have pledged to support actions aimed at accelerating research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) in technology areas where MI members believe increased international attention would make a significant impact in our shared fight against climate change. The Innovation Challenges cover the entire spectrum of RD&D; from early stage research needs assessments to technology demonstration projects. The Carbon Capture Innovation challenge aims to explore early stage research opportunities in the areas of Carbon Capture, Carbon Utilization, and Carbon Storage. The goal of the Carbon Capture Innovation Challenge is twofold: first, to identify and prioritize breakthrough technologies; and second, to recommend research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) pathways and collaboration mechanisms. During the webinar, Dr Tidjani Niass, Saudi Aramco, and Jordan Kislear, US Department of Energy, provided an overview of progress to date. They also highlighted detail opportunities for business and investor engagement, and discuss future plans for the Innovation Challenge.

Mission Innovation: Carbon Capture Innovation Challenge

Global CCS Institute

Karl Hausker, PhD, Senior Fellow, Climate Program, World Resources Institute, is the leader of the analytic and writing team for the latest study by the Risky Business Project: From Risk to Return: Investing in a Clean Energy Economy. Co-Chairs Michael Bloomberg, Henry Paulson, Jr, and Thomas Steyer tasked the World Resources Institute with this independent assessment of technically and economically feasible pathways that the US could follow to achieve an 80% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2050. These pathways involve mixtures of: energy efficiency, renewable energy, nuclear power, carbon capture and storage, increased carbon sequestration in US lands, and reductions in non-CO2 emissions. These pathways rely on commercial or near-commercial technologies that American companies are adopting and developing. Dr Hausker presented the results of the study and draw some comparisons to the US Mid Century Strategy report submitted to the UNFCCC. He has worked for 30 years in the fields of climate change, energy, and environment in a career that has spanned legislative and executive branches, research institutions, NGOs, and consulting. This webinar offered a unique opportunity to learn more about various decarbonization scenarios and to address your questions directly to Dr Hausker.

Can the United States Achieve a Low Carbon Economy by 2050?

Global CCS Institute

The Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum (CSLF) is a Ministerial-level international climate change initiative that is focused on the development of improved cost-effective technologies for carbon capture and storage (CCS). As part of our commitment to raising awareness of CCS policies and technology, CSLF, with support from the Global CCS Institute, is running a series of webinars showcasing academics and researchers that are working on some of the most interesting CCS projects and developments from around the globe. This first webinar comes to you from Abu Dhabi – the site of the Mid-Year CSLF Meeting and home of the Al Reyadah Carbon Capture, Utilization & Storage (CCUS) Project. The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is one of the world’s major oil exporters, with some of the highest levels of CO2 emissions per capita. These factors alone make this a very interesting region for the deployment of CCUS both as an option for reducing CO2 emissions, but also linking these operations for the purposes of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations. In the UAE, CCUS has attracted leading academic institutes and technology developers to work on developing advanced technologies for reducing CO2 emissions. On Wednesday, 26th April, we had the opportunity to join the Masdar Institute’s Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering, Mohammad Abu Zahra to learn about the current status and potential for CCUS in the UAE. Mohammad presented an overview of the current large scale CCUS demonstration project in the UAE, followed by a presentation and discussion of the ongoing research and development activities at the Masdar Institute. This webinar offered a rare opportunity to put your questions directly to this experienced researcher and learn more about the fascinating advances being made at the Masdar Institute.

Webinar Series: Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum Part 1. CCUS in the Uni...

Global CCS Institute

On 15 February, a Roadmap titled for Energy Security and Prosperity in Australia: A roadmap for carbon capture and storage was released. The ACCS Roadmap contains analysis and recommendations for policy makers and industry on much needed efforts to ensure CCS deployment in Australia. This presentation focused on the critical role CCS can play in Australia’s economic prosperity and energy security. To remain within its carbon budget, Australia must accelerate the deployment of CCS. Couple with this, only CCS can ensure energy security for the power sector and high-emissions industries whilst maintain the the vital role the energy sector plays in the Australian economy. The webinar also detailed what is required to get Australia ready for widespread commercial deployment of CCS through specific set of phases, known as horizons in strategic areas including storage characterisation, legal and regulatory frameworks and public engagement and awareness. The Roadmap serves as an important focal point for stakeholders advocating for CCS in Australia, and will provide a platform for further work feeding into the Australian Government’s review of climate policy in 2017 and beyond. It is authored by the University of Queensland and Gamma Energy Technology, and was overseen by a steering committee comprising the Commonwealth Government, NSW Government, CSIRO, CO2CRC Limited, ACALET - COAL21 Fund and ANLEC R&D. This webinar was presented by Professor Chris Greig, from The University of Queensland.

Energy Security and Prosperity in Australia: A roadmap for carbon capture and...

Global CCS Institute

The fifth webinar in the public engagement, education and outreach for CCS Series will explore the critically important subject of social site characterisation with the very researchers who named the process. We were delighted to be able to reunite CCS engagement experts Sarah Wade and Sallie Greenberg, Ph.D. to revisit their 2011 research and guidance: ‘Social Site Characterisation: From Concept to Application’. When published, this research and toolkit helped early CCS projects worldwide to raise the bar on their existing engagement practices. For this webinar, we tasked these early thought leaders with reminding us of the importance of this research and considering the past recommendations in today’s context. Sarah and Sallie tackled the following commonly asked questions: What exactly is meant by social site characterisation? Why it is important? What would they consider best practice for getting to understand the social intricacies and impacts of a CCS project site? This entire Webinar Series has been designed to share leading research and best practice and consider these learnings as applied to real project examples. So for this fifth Webinar, we were really pleased to be joined by Ruth Klinkhammer, Senior Manager, Communications and Engagement at CMC Research Institutes. Ruth agreed to share some of her experiences and challenges of putting social site characterisation into practice onsite at some of CMC’s larger research projects. This Webinar combined elements of public engagement research with real world application and discussion, explore important learnings and conclude with links to further resources for those wishing to learn more. This a must for anyone working in or studying carbon capture and storage or other CO2 abatement technologies. If you have ever nodded along at a conference where the importance of understanding stakeholders is acknowledged, but then stopped to wonder – what might that look like in practice? This Webinar is for you.

Webinar Series: Public engagement, education and outreach for CCS. Part 5: So...

Global CCS Institute

To highlight the research and achievements of Australian researchers, the Global CCS Institute, together with Australian National Low Emissions Coal Research and Development (ANLEC R&D), will hold a series of webinars throughout 2017. Each webinar will highlight a specific ANLEC R&D research project and the relevant report found on the Institute’s website. This is the eighth webinar of the series and will present on basin resource management and carbon storage. With the ongoing deployment of CCS facilities globally, the pore space - the voids in the rock deep in sedimentary basins – are now a commercial resource. This is a relatively new concept with only a few industries utilising that pore space to date. This webinar presented a framework for the management of basin resources including carbon storage. Prospective sites for geological storage of carbon dioxide target largely sedimentary basins since these provide the most suitable geological settings for safe, long-term storage of greenhouse gases. Sedimentary basins can host different natural resources that may occur in isolated pockets, across widely dispersed regions, in multiple locations, within a single layer of strata or at various depths. In Australia, the primary basin resources are groundwater, oil and gas, unconventional gas, coal and geothermal energy. Understanding the nature of how these resources are distributed in the subsurface is fundamental to managing basin resource development and carbon dioxide storage. Natural resources can overlap laterally or with depth and have been developed successfully for decades. Geological storage of carbon dioxide is another basin resource that must be considered in developing a basin-scale resource management system to ensure that multiple uses of the subsurface can sustainably and pragmatically co-exist. This webinar was presented by Karsten Michael, Research Team Leader, CSIRO Energy.

Managing carbon geological storage and natural resources in sedimentary basins

Global CCS Institute

To highlight the research and achievements of Australian researchers, the Global CCS Institute together with ANLEC R&D will hold a series of webinars throughout 2017. Each webinar will highlight a specific ANLEC R&D research project and the relevant report found on the Institute’s website. This is the seventh webinar of the series and presented the results of a test program on the retrofitted Callide A power plant in Central Queensland. The behaviour of trace metals and the related characteristics of the formation of fine particles may have important implications for process options, gas cleaning, environmental risk and resultant cost in oxy-fuel combustion. Environmental and operational risk will be determined by a range of inter-related factors including: The concentrations of trace metals in the gas produced from the overall process; Capture efficiencies of the trace species in the various air pollution control devices used in the process; including gas and particulate control devices, and specialised systems for the removal of specific species such as mercury; Gas quality required to avoid operational issues such as corrosion, and to enable sequestration in a variety of storage media without creating unacceptable environmental risks; the required quality for CO2 transport will be defined by (future and awaited) regulation but may be at the standards currently required of food or beverage grade CO2; and Speciation of some trace elements Macquarie University was engaged by the Australian National Low Emissions Coal Research and Development Ltd (ANLEC R&D) to investigate the behaviour of trace elements during oxy-firing and CO2 capture and processing in a test program on the retrofitted Callide A power plant, with capability for both oxy and air-firing. Gaseous and particulate sampling was undertaken in the process exhaust gas stream after fabric filtration at the stack and at various stages of the CO2 compression and purification process. These measurements have provided detailed information on trace components of oxy-fired combustion gases and comparative measurements under air fired conditions. The field trials were supported by laboratory work where combustion took place in a drop tube furnace and modelling of mercury partitioning using the iPOG model. The results obtained suggest that oxy-firing does not pose significantly higher environmental or operational risks than conventional air-firing. The levels of trace metals in the “purified” CO2 gas stream should not pose operational issues within the CO2 Processing Unit (CPU). This webinar was presented by Peter Nelson, Professor of Environmental Studies, and Anthony Morrison, Senior Research Fellow, from the Department of Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University.

Mercury and other trace metals in the gas from an oxy-combustion demonstratio...

Global CCS Institute

Teesside Collective has been developing a financial support mechanism to kickstart an Industrial Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) network in the UK. This project would transform the Teesside economy, which could act as a pilot area in the UK as part of the Government’s Industrial Strategy. The final report– produced by Pöyry Management Consulting in partnership with Teesside Collective – outlines how near-term investment in CCS can be a cost-effective, attractive proposition for both Government and energy-intensive industry. The report was published on Teesside Collective’s website on 7 February. You will be able to view copies of the report in advance of the webinar. We were delighted to welcome Sarah Tennison from Tees Valley Combined Authority back onto the webinar programme. Sarah was joined by Phil Hare and Stuart Murray from Pöyry Management Consulting, to take us through the detail of the model and business case for Industrial CCS. This webinar offered a rare opportunity to speak directly with these project developers and understand more about their proposed financial support mechanism.

Webinar Series: Public engagement, education and outreach for CCS. Part 4: Is...

Global CCS Institute

To highlight the research and achievements of Australian researchers, the Global CCS Institute together with ANLEC R&D will hold a series of webinars throughout 2016 and 2017. Each webinar will highlight a specific ANLEC R&D research project and the relevant report found on the Institute’s website. This is the sixth webinar of the series and presented the results of chemical and mechanical changes that carbon dioxide (CO2) may have at a prospective storage complex in the Surat Basin, Queensland, Australia. Earth Sciences and Chemical Engineering researchers at the University of Queensland have been investigating the effects of supercritical CO2 injection on reservoir properties in the near wellbore region as a result of geochemical reactions since 2011. The near wellbore area is critical for CO2 injection into deep geological formations as most of the resistance to flow occurs in this region. Any changes to the permeability can have significant economic impact in terms of well utilisation efficiency and compression costs. In the far field, away from the well, the affected reservoir is much larger and changes to permeability through blocking or enhancement have relatively low impact. This webinar was presented by Prof Sue Golding and Dr Grant Dawson and will provide an overview of the findings of the research to assist understanding of the beneficial effects and commercial consequences of near wellbore injectivity enhancement as a result of geochemical reactions.

Laboratory-scale geochemical and geomechanical testing of near wellbore CO2 i...

Global CCS Institute

The third webinar in the public engagement, education and outreach for CCS Series digged deeper, perhaps multiple kilometres deeper, to explore successful methods for engaging the public on the often misunderstood topic of carbon (CO2) storage. Forget bad experiences of high school geology, we kick-started our 2017 webinar program with three ‘rock stars’ of CO2 storage communication – Dr Linda Stalker, Science Director of Australia’s National Geosequestration Laboratory, Lori Gauvreau, Communication and Engagement Specialist for Schlumberger Carbon Services, and Norm Sacuta, Communication Manager at the Petroleum Technology Research Centre who all joined Kirsty Anderson, the Institute’s Senior Advisor on Public Engagement, to discuss the challenges of communicating about CO2 storage. They shared tips, tools and some creative solutions for getting people engaged with this topic. This entire Webinar Series has been designed to hear directly from the experts and project practitioners researching and delivering public engagement, education and outreach best practice for carbon capture and storage. This third webinar was less focused on research and more on the real project problems and best practice solutions. It is a must for anyone interested in science communication/education and keen to access resources and ideas to make their own communications more engaging.

Webinar Series: Public engagement, education and outreach for CCS. Part 3: Ca...

Global CCS Institute

The potential for increased water use has often been noted as a challenge to the widespread deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Early studies, that are widely referenced and cited in discussions of CCS, indicated that installation of a capture system would nearly double water consumption for thermal power generation, while more recent studies show different results. The Global CCS Institute has conducted a comprehensive review of data available in order to clarify messages around water consumption associated with installation of a capture system. Changes in water use estimates over time have been evaluated in terms of capture technology, cooling systems, and how the data are reported. Guido Magneschi, Institute’s Senior Advisor – Carbon Capture, and co-author of the study, presented the results of the review and illustrated the main conclusions.

Water use of thermal power plants equipped with CO2 capture systems

Global CCS Institute

Plus de Global CCS Institute (20)