Playful engagement: Public perception
•
0 j'aime•1,638 vues
This document appears to be a slide presentation about playful engagement and public perception. It discusses using playful design to give people access to complex topics. It frames several "battles" around concepts like risk vs disinfection, digital vs physical, individual vs group, noise vs attention, and memory vs memorable/consumption vs creation. Each battle contains images and quotes about the concepts and examples of playful library programs and spaces that bring the concepts to life, like an outdoor cinema program. The overall message seems to be about using playful and creative approaches to engage the public in new ways and spark ideas.
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Tendances
Tendances (20)
En vedette
En vedette (10)
Similaire à Playful engagement: Public perception
Similaire à Playful engagement: Public perception (18)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
Playful engagement: Public perception
- 1. Intelligent Information Symposium #iiau Playful engagement: Public perception http://www.flickr.com/photos/89242035@N00/5078532833
- 3. P–3 ‘Using playful design or devices to give people permission to experience something complex where barriers to access or use are broken down.’ Playful engagement
- 6. P–6 ‘Well, you can't never let anything happen to him. Then nothing would ever happen to him. Not much fun for little Harpo.’ Dory, Finding Nemo Risk vs. Disinfection
- 8. P–8 ‘Being playful is not a strategy but an outlook on interacting with the world.’ Risk vs. Disinfection
- 10. P–10 Risk vs. Disinfection Infection! Playful mindset Imagination and navigation Storytelling – various mediums Urgency – the power of now Zombie LibGuides Dr. Who series (Splendid Chaps) Library Wars manga http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2739/4052161755_a5ba7e6651.jpg
- 14. P–14 Risk vs. Disinfection Game traits A goal (a sense of purpose) Rules (unleash creativity and foster strategic thinking) A feedback system (the promise of goals and the motivation to keep playing) Voluntary participation Jane McGonigal, Reality is broken http://www.flickr.com/photos/14516334@N00/6619430423
- 16. P–16 Risk vs. Disinfection Programming Community groups Volunteers Business connections Infrastructure A goal, an outcome
- 18. P–18 Game Name: Name a collection strength and associate as many games with that those resources as possible. Risk vs. Disinfection
- 19. P–19 Risk vs. disinfection Level 1 Complete! “feed your brains”
- 23. P–23 “We help the virtual world grow by planting little bits of humanity for other people to see and connect with.” Aleks Krotoski Digital vs. Physical
- 24. P–24 Digital vs. Physical Special Powers Space Speed Technology Iteration Personalised Accessible http://www.flickr.com/photos/83346641@N00/7385470852
- 25. P–25 “The digital revolution should spark library evolution.” Dan Terzian Digital vs. Physical
- 26. P–26 Digital vs. Physical Game changer Mobile access Tablet computing Virtual layers Data, big data Creativity Sharing - digitising http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2507/3773116901_35e2eba130.jpg
- 28. P–28 Digital vs. Physical Makers & hackers Sharing Openness Collaboration Hands-on imperative OGDC: •Build consensus •Build community •Share ideas •Make things http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5250/5203908319_bab38209c3.jpg
- 30. P–30 Digital vs. Physical Forces on space Capacity Pull onsite Push online Voices Channels http://www.flickr.com/photos/d35ign/6226852671/
- 31. P–31 Digital vs. Physical Design thinking 1.Discovery 2.Interpretation 3.Ideation 4.Experimentation 5.Evolution
- 32. P–32 Space Race: Design your perfect ‘playful’ space without writing or drawing it. Use objects at your disposal/tables. Digital vs. Physical
- 33. P–33 Risk vs. disinfection Level 2 Complete! “use the force”
- 34. Battle #3 Double-tag round! P–34 INDIVIDUAL & NOISE vs. GROUP & ATTENTION
- 35. P–35 Individual vs. Group Factors Traditional Playful tools Where’s the expertise? Collection trends Merge local needs Think in public http://www.flickr.com/photos/25414324@N02/2932863300
- 36. P–36 Individual vs. Group Community Where are the people? Observe & interact Join & contribute
- 37. P–37 Individual vs. Group Partnerships Grow new networks Build shared purpose Test the relationship Reputation Reach http://www.flickr.com/photos/45940879@N04/6310404534
- 38. P–38 Noise vs. Attention Our methods Library website Facebook, Twitter, Flickr Signage Radio Other websites Postcards Press Word of mouthhttp://www.flickr.com/photos/66289072@N08/7912137730
- 39. P–39 Noise vs. Attention – Freeplay: Independent Games Festival
- 40. P–40 Individual vs. Group: Outside-In Cinema
- 41. P–41 Individual vs. Group: Outside-In Cinema
- 42. P–42 Individual vs. Group: Outside-In Cinema
- 43. P–43 Individual vs. Group: Outside-In Cinema 76%24%
- 44. P–44 Individual vs. Group: Outside-In Cinema
- 45. P–45 “I had no idea this is what you guys really did!”
- 46. P–46 “It was great to see a public resource used creatively.”
- 47. P–47 Individual vs. Group: Outside-In Cinema
- 48. P–48 Amplification: Pick a ‘new & surprising’ channel or partner that would make a difference to your engagement. Noise vs. Attention
- 49. P–49 Noise vs. Attention Level 3 Complete! “network nodes”
- 50. Battle #4 Final round! P–50 MEMORY & CONSUMPTION vs. MEMORABLE & CREATION
- 51. P–51 Information Pieces to patterns ‘Apophenia’ Scarcity to abundance Trusted sources Memory vs. Memorable
- 52. P–52 A connected site GLAM in the 1870s Old systems New drivers Information glut Filter failure Digital diets Memory vs. Memorable http://handle.slv.vic.gov.au/10381/157944
- 53. Consumption vs. Creation P–53 Data Meaningful Localized Infographics Visualisations Play = explore http://internet-map.net/
- 54. Consumption vs. Creation Audience Want discovery Want an experience Want to learn Emotional reaction http://www.flickr.com/photos/56041749@N02/6400358699
- 56. Memory vs. Memorable P–56 Libraries Inspiration service provider http://www.flickr.com/photos/46213661@N00/6175154545
- 57. P–57 Consume vs. Create Level 4 Complete! “1TB RAM added”
- 58. P–58 “A library platform should be measured less on the circulation of its works than in the circulation of the ideas and passions these works spark.” David Weinberger