The Indian Dental Academy is the Leader in continuing dental education , training dentists in all aspects of dentistry and offering a wide range of dental certified courses in different formats.
Finit element in prosthodontics /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental academy
1. INDIAN DENTAL ACADEMY
Leader in continuing dental education
www.indiandentalacademy.com
www.indiandentalacademy.com
2. EDENTULOUS STATE
Finite element analysis is a numerical method based on the principle of dividing
a structure into finite number of small elements that are interconnected with
each other at the corner points or nodes having 3 degrees of freedom which
translates in X, Y and Z directions.
Each element is assigned unique elastic properties (Poisson’s ratio and
Modulus of Elasticity) to represent the materials modeled and for each element
its mechanical behavior can be written as a function of displacement of the
nodes.
The nodes are submitted to certain loading conditions resulting in a behavior of
the model similar to the structures it represents. When a computer analysis is
performed a system of simultaneous equations can be solved to relate all forces
and displacements at the nodes.
From this stresses and stress contours can be established in each element and
thus for the whole body.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
3. The study was divided into following heads
Construction of geometric model
Preparing the finite element mesh
Validation of model
Application of forces and boundary conditions
Analysis of stress pattern
www.indiandentalacademy.com
5. Construction of Geometric Model
Modeling of Mandibular canine
Complete Geometric Model of Tooth with Surfaces United at Different Levels
www.indiandentalacademy.com
6. Construction of Geometric Model
Modeling of Mandibular canine
Mandibular Canine Characteristics
Length of the Crown
Length of Root
Mesiodistal Diameter of crown
Mesiodistal Diameter at cervix
Buccolingual Diameter
Buccolingual Diameter at cervix
Curvature of cervical line – mesial
Curvature of cervical line – distal
= 10.5 mm
= 16.0 mm
= 7.0 mm
= 5.5 mm
= 7.5 mm
= 7.0 mm
= 2.5 mm
= 1.0 mm
www.indiandentalacademy.com
7. Construction of Geometric Model
Modeling of Attachment designs
Bar-Clip Attachment
Dimension of Bar : 3 mm wide x 1.5 mm depth
Coping : 0.5 mm
Post : 5 mm
Ball-Socket Attachment
Dimension of Ball: 2 mm dia.
Post :
www.indiandentalacademy.com10 mm
9. Construction of Geometric Model
Modeling of Mandibular body (cortical and cancellous bone)
Total length of edentulous Mandibular body = 70 mm
Length of mandible posterior to canine = 35 mm
Inter-canine distance = 20 mm
Height = 23 mm
Width = 11.5 mm
Thickness of cortical bone
Labial = 1 mm
Lingual = 2 mm
Cranial = 1 mm
Caudal = 4 mm
Thickness of alveolar bone proper = 2 mm
www.indiandentalacademy.com
10. Construction of Geometric Model
Modeling of Mucosa and Overdenture
Thickness of Mucosa : 2 mm
Overdenture:
Height above abutment = 6 mm,
www.indiandentalacademy.com
Width of overdenture = 12 mm
11. Preparation of Finite Element Mesh
A 3-D finite element model was generated using Cosmos Pre and
Post Processor GeoStar.
The structure except for periodontal ligament was idealized using 8noded 3-D solid brick elements (Hexahedral) having 3 degrees of
freedom per node (i.e. Mesial, Axial and Facial directions).
The periodontal ligament space was meshed by using 1-D spring
elements and the orientation of these spring element was duplicated
fro the orientation of principal fibers as seen in histological sections
and were uniformly spaced throughout the tooth.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
12. Completed Finite Element Model
Bar-Clip Attachment
Ball-Socket Attachment
www.indiandentalacademy.com
13. Distribution of Elements and Nodes
(Bar-Clip & Ball-Socket)
No. of Elements (3D + 1D)
No. of Nodes
Total degree of Freedom
Bar-Clip
29085
32859
95678
Ball Socket
29301
33056
95886
www.indiandentalacademy.com
14. Material Properties Assigned to the Various
Components of Finite Element Model
Material
Modulus of Elasticity (Mpa)
Poisson’s ratio
Dentin
18000
0.31
Cementum
18000
0.31
69
0.45
Cortical bone
13700
0.30
Cancellous bone
1370
0.30
10
0.40
182000
0.30
Acrylic resin
2260
0.37
Gutta-percha
0.69
0.45
18000
0.31
Periodontal ligament
Mucosa
Ni-Cr metal
Zinc-Phosphate cement
www.indiandentalacademy.com
15. VALIDATION OF MODEL
The mathematical model was verified by computation of the axial
displacement corresponding to 10 N vertical force to the canine.
A displacement of 0.02-0.03 mm was computed, were obtained by
assigning the physical constants to the elements in the models.
Displacements were used to judge the appropriate mesh size as it
provides a convenient and useful measure in most linear problem.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
16. APPLICATION OF BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
Symmetric boundary conditions were imposed at the mid symphyseal
region since only half of the mandible was modeled. On the distal side all
the three translation were fixed to simulate the exact physiologic situation.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
17. APPLICATION OF FORCES
•
Two different types of forces were applied:
– Static distributed load of 70 N consistent with incisal bite force in denture
wearers applied to the incisal third of the abutment.
– As during bilateral biting, a distributed load of 120N, directed anteriorly and
downward at an angle of 15 degrees to the vertical was applied in first molar
region.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
18. ANALYSIS OF STRESS PATTERN
The stress distribution in the structure is presented in the form of contour
plots of different cases of model studied. In order to get clear picture of
the stress status the contour plots of Von Mises Stress have been made
separately for the areas of special interest i.e. in the attachment design,
tooth, cortical bone around the tooth and the bone at the back separately
by using Iterative Solver of Cosmos M / Ver. 2.5 of Finite Element
Software.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
19. Von Mises Stress Value (in Mpa) in Attachments
for Two Attachment Designs under 70 and 120
Newton Force
Bar-Clip
70 Newton (Group I)
120 Newton (Group II)
Ball-Socket
90
109
53.45
80.14
www.indiandentalacademy.com
20. Under 70 Newton Force
Bar-Clip Attachment
Ball-Socket Attachment
www.indiandentalacademy.com
21. Under 120 Newton Force
Bar-Clip Attachment www.indiandentalacademy.comBall-Socket Attachment
22. Von Mises Stress Value (in Mpa) in Abutment
Tooth for Two Two Attachment Designs under
70 and 120 Newton Force
Bar-Clip
Ball-Socket
70 Newton (Group I)
26.4
47.2
120 Newton (Group II)
6.64
46.55
www.indiandentalacademy.com
23. Under 70 Newton Force
Bar-Clip Attachment
Ball-Socket Attachment
www.indiandentalacademy.com
24. Under 120 Newton Force
Bar-Clip Attachment
www.indiandentalacademy.comBall-Socket Attachment
25. Von Mises Stress Value (in Mpa) in Top and
Apical Cortical Layer for Two Attachment
Designs under 70 and 120 Newton Force
Top Cortical Layer
Apical Cortical Layer
Bar-Clip
70 Newton (Group I)
120 Newton (Group II)
Ball-Socket
Bar-Clip
Ball-Socket
17
23
4.5
6.7
15.54
16.24
8.82
8.27
www.indiandentalacademy.com
26. Under 70 Newton Force
Bar-Clip Attachment
Ball-Socket Attachment
www.indiandentalacademy.com
27. Under 120 Newton Force
Bar-Clip Attachment
www.indiandentalacademy.comBall-Socket Attachment
28. Under 70 Newton Force
Bar-Clip Attachment
Ball-Socket Attachment
www.indiandentalacademy.com
29. Under 120 Newton Force
Bar-Clip Attachment
www.indiandentalacademy.comBall-Socket Attachment
30. RESULTS
• The stress transmitted to the abutment tooth using two different
attachment designs varied from 2-47.2 Mpa for two different
masticatory loads applied. The maximum of 47.2 Mpa was transmitted
in case of Ball-Socket Design and that of 43.50 in Bar-Clip Design.
• The stress transmitted to the cortical bone using two different
attachment designs varied from 2-22 Mpa for two different masticatory
loads applied. In top cortical layer it was 22 Mpa maximum, while in
apical cortical layer it was 43 Mpa and in posterior cortical layer it was
11.5 Mpa
• For the top cortical layer, maximum stress of 23 Mpa was transmitted
in case of Ball-Socket Design, while 17 Mpa was transmitted in case of
Bar-Clip Design.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
31. RESULTS
• For the apical cortical layer, Bar-Clip design transmitted a little high
value of 14.3 Mpa than 12.50 as transmitted by Ball-Socket design.
• There was no difference in the stress transmitted to the posterior
cortical layer in the first molar region for the two attachment designs
under masticatory loads.
• Among the two masticatory forces, 70 N incisal force transmitted the
maximum stresses to the abutment tooth and cortical bone. At this
load Ball and Socket Design showed maximum stress value of 47.2
Mpa in abutment tooth and 23 Mpa in cortical bone, while the Bar-Clip
design, the value was 26.4 Mpa and 17 Mpa respectively.
• The stress transmitted to the two attachment designs varied from 6 to
121.07 Mpa. The maximum stress 121.07 Mpa was found in BallSocket, while Bar-Clip showed a value of 90 Mpa.
www.indiandentalacademy.com