2. What is it?
Use of Computed Tomography to image a beating heart
Non invasive
Good visualisation of the coronary vessels
Provides useful diagnostic information regarding coronary
artery disease (CAD)
3. Conjoint Committee for Recognition
of Training in CTCA
Body that governs specialists in Australia and New
Zealand who report CTCA
Radiologist, Cardiologists and Nuclear Medicine
Physicians
Complete requisite training criteria
Level A: 150 live and library cases (300 cases every 3 years)
Level B: 300 live and library cases (600 every 3 years)
4. Why Refer for a CTCA
Examination of coronary artery that is
Low risk
Low radiation
Non invasive
5. Why Refer for a CTCA
Accurately detect and grade stenosies or narrowing
Demonstrate developmental anomalies of cornary vessels
Check patency of existing grafts
6. Patients who would benefit…
Suspected CAD
Presents with atypical chest pain
Coronary artery anomaly
Asymptomatic atherosclerosis with known CAD
Post by-pass surgery patients
7. Indications
Based on Framingham criteria (risk score), previous
nuclear and stress echocardiogram or coronary
angiography
Framingham criteria is a risk score assessment tool based
on a study of
11,611American patients
20-76 years
No self reported CAD, stroke, peripheral arterial dusease
or diabetes
9. Indications
Results
82% Low: 10% of less CAD risk at 10 years
16% Intermediate: 10-20% CAD risk at 10 years
3% High: More than 20% CAD risk at 10 years
High risk category mainly contained advanced age and
male gender
Risk calculator available on internet
10. Indications
Chest pain (Low to intermediate pre test probability)
CABG and stents (stent length <3mm)
Cardiac conditions
Non coronary valvular surgery
Unexplained heart failure and arrythmias
Coronary anomalies
AF Ablation
Early detection/screening
11. Rebatable Indications for
CTCA
Stable symp;toms consistent with coronary ischaemia, low
to intermediate risk or CAD, people who have been
considered for coronary angiography
Undergoing non-coronary cardiac surgery
Exclusion of artery anomaly
12. Comparison of CTCA with Selective Coronary
Angiography (>50% luminal stenosis)
n
CAD
Prevelance
Sensitivity
Specificity
PPV
NPV
ACCURAC
Y
230
25%
95%
83%
64%
99%
CORE64
291
56%
85%
90%
91%
83%
Dutch Study
360
68%
99%
64%
86%
97%
13. Patient Preparation…
Withould caffeine from midnight prior to examination
4hr fast
BP and HR measurement
If HR >60-65bpm : betablocker
ECG monitoring (gated study)