SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  35
Cooperative Learning
Kapil kumar
M.ED(H.I)
Content
1. Introduction
2. Defination
3. History
4. Types
5. Elements
6. Techniques
7. Benefits
8. Advantages and Disadvantages
9. Review of Literature.
Introduction
 Cooperative Learning can be defined as collaboration in
an instructional setting either between or among
members of small groups that achieves learning
outcomes, including ability to remember and utilize what
is learned
 Students work together in small groups and learn
through interaction with each other while the teacher
coaches the process.
 Cooperative Learning is part of a group of
teaching/learning techniques where students interact with
each other to acquire and practice the elements of a
subject matter and to meet common learning goals.
DEFINITION
• Cooperative learning involves students working
together in small groups to accomplish shared goals.
(Gillies, R., 2007)
• Successful cooperative learning tasks as
intellectually demanding, creative, open-ended, and
involve higher order thinking tasks.
(Ross and Smyth., 1995)
History
• Prior to World War II, social theorists such as
Allport, Watson, Shaw, and Mead began
establishing cooperative learning theory after
finding that group work was more effective and
efficient in quantity, quality, and overall
productivity when compared to working alone.
• However, it wasn’t until 1937 when researchers
May and Doob found that people who cooperate
and work together to achieve shared goals, were
more successful in attaining outcomes, than
those who strived independently to complete the
same goals
TYPES OF COOPERATIVE
LEARNING
Formal cooperative learning
Informal cooperative learning
Group based learning
Types
Formal cooperative learning is structured,
facilitated, and monitored by the educator over
time and is used to achieve group goals in task
work (e.g. completing a unit).
Any course material or assignment can be
adapted to this type of learning, and groups can
vary from 2-6 people with discussions lasting
from a few minutes up to an entire period.
Conti…..
Informal cooperative learning
incorporates group learning with passive
teaching by drawing attention to material
through small groups throughout the
lesson or by discussion at the end of a
lesson.
These groups are often temporary and
can change from lesson to lesson
Group based learning
• In group-based cooperative learning, these peer groups
gather together over the long to develop and contribute to
one another’s knowledge mastery on a topic by regularly
discussing material, encouraging one another, and
supporting the academic and personal success of group
members.
• Base group learning is effective for learning complex
subject matter over the course or semester and establishes
caring, supportive peer relationships, which in turn
motivates and strengthens the student’s commitment to the
group’s education while increasing self-esteem and self-
worth.
Effective Cooperative Learning Groups
5 Elements
1. Positive Interdependence
2. Individual and group Accountability
3. Face-To-Face Interaction
4. Interpersonal and small group skills
5. Group Processing(reflection)
Positive Interdependence
 Task and goals are clearly defined
 Efforts of each team member benefits the individual as well
as the group
 Commitment made to both personal as well as group
success
 Students must fully participate and put forth effort within
their group
 Each group member has a task/role/responsibility therefore
must believe that they are responsible for their learning and
that of their group.
Individual and Group
Accountability
 Each group member will be held accountable for your
share of the work and mastering the learning.
 Each team member must contribute to the group as a
whole
 Each team member is accountable for helping the group to
reach its goals
 Each student must demonstrate mastery of the content
being studied
Face-To-Face Interaction
• Promote one another success by sharing resources
• Encourage, help, and applaud each other effort’s
• Support one another academically and personally
• Explain how to solve problems
• Teach each other
• Check’s for one another understanding
• Discuss concept being learned
• Connect present with past learning
• Foster the group mutual goal
Interpersonal and small group skills
 Each team member must:
• Be motivated
• Provide effective leadership
• Be able to make decisions
• Be able to build trusts
• Be able to communicate
• Be able to manage conflict
Group processing(reflection)
 Students :
• Communicate openly, freely, respectfully discussing their
concern
• Maintain effective working relationship
• Describe what member actions are helpful
• Make decisions about behaviours to
continue/change/discontinue
• Process status of goal achievement and accomplishment
Techniques
Jigsaw
Think-Pair-Share
Three-Step Interview
Round Robin Brainstorming
Three-minute Review
Numbered Heads
Book Ends
Jigsaw
• Group students into sets of five. Assign unique
information to learn to each group member. After
reading the material, instruct group members to
take turns teaching their material to their
teammates.
Think-Pair-Share
• Pose a question, and ask students to think about
its answer. Instruct students to pair off and take
turns explaining their answers to each other.
• This is a four-step discussion strategy that
incorporates wait time and aspects of cooperative
learning. Students (and teachers) learn to LISTEN
while a question is posed, THINK (without raising
hands) of a response, PAIR with a neighbor to discuss
responses, and SHARE their responses with the
whole class. Time limits and transition cues help
discussion move smoothly. Students are able to
rehearse responses mentally and verbally, and all
students have an opportunity to talk. Both students
and teachers have increased opportunities to think
and become involved in group discussion. (Lyman)
Three-Step Interview
• Group students into pairs. In step one, ask
individuals to interview their partners. In step
two, ask partners to reverse roles. In step three,
select a few students to explain their partners’
answer to the entire class.
• This involves structured group activity with students.
Using interviews/listening techniques that have been
modeled; one student interviews another about an
announced topic. "en time is up, students switch roles
as interviewer and interviewee. Pairs then join to form
groups of four. Students take turns introducing their
pair partners and sharing what the pair partners had to
say. This structure can be used as a team builder, and
also for opinion questions, predicting, evaluation,
sharing book reports, etc. (Kagan)
Round Robin Brainstorming
•Group students into sets of four or five each, and instruct
each group to appoint a recorder. Pose a question having
several answers. Have group members think silently about
responses and then take turns sharing their ideas with the
others in the group. Ask group members not to criticize one
another's responses. Instruct the recorder to write down the
ideas. After a few minutes, stop the discussions, and select a
member of each group to read the recorder’s list aloud.
• Roundtable can be used for brainstorming, reviewing, or
practicing while also serving as a team builder. Sequential form:
• Students sit in teams of 3 or more, with one piece of paper and
one pencil. The teacher asks a question which has multiple
answers. Students take turns writing one answer on the paper,
then passing the paper and pencil clockwise to the next person.
When time is called, teams with the most correct answers are
recognized. Teams reflect on their strategies and consider
ways they could improve. Simultaneous form: Each student
starts a piece of paper, writes one answer, and passes it, so
several papers are moving at once. (Kagan)
Three-minute Review
• Pause during or at the end of a lecture or discussion.
Ask students to work with partners to summarize the
lecture or discussion. After three minutes, call on a
few students to share their group’s summary with
the class.
Numbered Heads
• Group students into sets of four, and number the
members of each group one through four. Give the
groups questions to answer. Ask each group to
decide upon an answer, and call on all persons with
a certain number to take turns reporting to the class.
• This structure is useful for quickly reviewing objective
material in a fun way. The students in each team are
numbered (each team might have 4 students
numbered 1, 2, 3, 4). Students coach each other on
material to be mastered. Teachers pose a question
and call a number. Only the students with that number
are eligible to answer and earn points for their team,
building both individual accountability and positive
interdependence. This may be done with only one
student in the class responding (sequential form), or
with all the numbers, 3's for instance, responding
using an Every Pupil Response technique such as
cards or hand signals (simultaneous form). (Kagan)
Book Ends
• Ask students to pair up. Give them a topic, and tell
them to spend a couple of minutes deciding how to
teach that topic to their partners. After giving
participants time to think, invite them to take turns
teaching the topic to their partners.
Benefits of co-operative
learning
Cooperative Learning Benefits
Cooperative Learning teaching techniques facilitate learning
and memory by:
• Ensuring attention through active student participation
• Adding meaning and relevance to the material
• Enabling students to learn from “modeling” or through
observation of others
• Students of all ability levels show higher academic
achievement when taught using cooperative learning
techniques as opposed to traditional techniques.
• Encouraging student participation through expectation of
rewards - desire to avoid possible punishments
Advantages and
Disadvantages of cooperative
learning
Advantages
• It has been shown to have a positive
effect on student learning when
compared to individual or competitive
conditions
• It has the potential to produce a level of
engagement that other forms of learning
cannot
• Students may explain things better to
another student than a teacher to a class.
Students learn how to teach one another
and explain material in their own words
• Questions are more likely to be asked
and answered in a group setting
Disadvantages
• A burden is making the students
responsible for each other’s learning
apart from themselves
• One study showed that in groups of
mixed ability, low-achieving students
become passive and do not focus on the
task
• Depending on an individual’s
motivation and interest on a particular
subject that will determine how well
they would learn
• Low achiver become Puzzled Because
of so many questions
Review of literature
• Maureen and keri (2002)
• examined the effect of a cooperative learning programs on
the social acceptance of children with moderate to severe
intellectual disabilities by young children without
disabilities.
• Sample size was 51 MMR. Random sampling method was
taken for the selection of the sample. Children without
disabilities were assigned to a cooperative learning
programme or a social contact programme, which are taken
as the control group.
• The result of the study indicated that the cooperative
learning treatments resulted In positive changes in several
indices in the social acceptance of the children with
moderate and severe intellectual disabilities by their peers
without disabilities.
 Robert Slavin (1994)
 Student Team Learning -Slavin defines cooperative learning as
“instructional programs in which students work in small groups to
help one another master academic content.
Through his review of the literature on cooperative learning, Slavin
identifies three concepts that are fundamental to all cooperative
learning/Student Team Learning techniques:
1. Students are rewarded as a team but are graded individually.
2. The team’s success is not conditionally based on individual
performance of one student. All students must help each other to
achieve learning goals.
3. All students are expected to improve based on their own previous
performance, thus ensuring all students are challenged to do their best.
Spencer Kagan (1989)
• Recommend that teachers use the “structural approach” to
cooperative learning, which involves “content-free ways of
organizing social interaction in the classroom.
• The strategy of cooperative learning was developed as a
means to reduce competition in American schools, which
James Coleman (1959) identified as a negative component
of the education system. Coleman suggests that instead of
encouraging competition in the academic setting, “which
effectively impedes the process of education,” schools
should introduce a more collaborative approach to teaching.

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Tendances (20)

ICT in Inclusive Education
ICT in Inclusive EducationICT in Inclusive Education
ICT in Inclusive Education
 
Kothari commission 1964 - 66
Kothari commission  1964 - 66Kothari commission  1964 - 66
Kothari commission 1964 - 66
 
Introducing a lesson
Introducing a lesson Introducing a lesson
Introducing a lesson
 
Curriculum Adaptations/Modifications disability wise B.Ed notes study materia...
Curriculum Adaptations/Modifications disability wise B.Ed notes study materia...Curriculum Adaptations/Modifications disability wise B.Ed notes study materia...
Curriculum Adaptations/Modifications disability wise B.Ed notes study materia...
 
Inclusive education - Definition, concept and significance of Inclusive educa...
Inclusive education - Definition, concept and significance of Inclusive educa...Inclusive education - Definition, concept and significance of Inclusive educa...
Inclusive education - Definition, concept and significance of Inclusive educa...
 
Bruner’s Concept Attainment Model
Bruner’s Concept Attainment ModelBruner’s Concept Attainment Model
Bruner’s Concept Attainment Model
 
Inclusive Education : Some Justifications and Provisions Inclusive education
Inclusive Education : Some Justifications and Provisions Inclusive educationInclusive Education : Some Justifications and Provisions Inclusive education
Inclusive Education : Some Justifications and Provisions Inclusive education
 
Language as subject and as a means of communication
Language as subject and as a means of communicationLanguage as subject and as a means of communication
Language as subject and as a means of communication
 
Herbartian approach
Herbartian approachHerbartian approach
Herbartian approach
 
Models of teaching
Models of teachingModels of teaching
Models of teaching
 
Assessment in Inclusive Practices
Assessment in Inclusive Practices Assessment in Inclusive Practices
Assessment in Inclusive Practices
 
Objective Based and Competency Based Evaluation
Objective Based and Competency Based EvaluationObjective Based and Competency Based Evaluation
Objective Based and Competency Based Evaluation
 
NPE-68 & 86 recommendations for PWD
NPE-68 & 86 recommendations for PWDNPE-68 & 86 recommendations for PWD
NPE-68 & 86 recommendations for PWD
 
Head master duties and responsibilities
Head master duties and responsibilitiesHead master duties and responsibilities
Head master duties and responsibilities
 
National Policy on Education-1986
National Policy on Education-1986National Policy on Education-1986
National Policy on Education-1986
 
Skill of explaining (ishrat naaz)
Skill of explaining (ishrat naaz)Skill of explaining (ishrat naaz)
Skill of explaining (ishrat naaz)
 
Unit plan
Unit planUnit plan
Unit plan
 
Common School System
Common School SystemCommon School System
Common School System
 
Inclusive Education ppt
Inclusive Education pptInclusive Education ppt
Inclusive Education ppt
 
Achievement& Diagnostic test
Achievement& Diagnostic testAchievement& Diagnostic test
Achievement& Diagnostic test
 

Similaire à Cooperative Learning in Special Education

515d55ae3ffd8c290b29c3e1c3c1796a681c53de-1643341006688.pptx
515d55ae3ffd8c290b29c3e1c3c1796a681c53de-1643341006688.pptx515d55ae3ffd8c290b29c3e1c3c1796a681c53de-1643341006688.pptx
515d55ae3ffd8c290b29c3e1c3c1796a681c53de-1643341006688.pptx
WeeSee1
 
Peer To Peer Learning 10 7 09f1
Peer To Peer Learning 10 7 09f1Peer To Peer Learning 10 7 09f1
Peer To Peer Learning 10 7 09f1
goodbuys
 

Similaire à Cooperative Learning in Special Education (20)

515d55ae3ffd8c290b29c3e1c3c1796a681c53de-1643341006688.pptx
515d55ae3ffd8c290b29c3e1c3c1796a681c53de-1643341006688.pptx515d55ae3ffd8c290b29c3e1c3c1796a681c53de-1643341006688.pptx
515d55ae3ffd8c290b29c3e1c3c1796a681c53de-1643341006688.pptx
 
Collaborative Activities,HOTS Activities,Creative Learning.pdf
Collaborative Activities,HOTS Activities,Creative Learning.pdfCollaborative Activities,HOTS Activities,Creative Learning.pdf
Collaborative Activities,HOTS Activities,Creative Learning.pdf
 
Online assignment archa mohan s
Online assignment archa mohan sOnline assignment archa mohan s
Online assignment archa mohan s
 
Cooperative Learning
Cooperative LearningCooperative Learning
Cooperative Learning
 
Online assignment
Online assignmentOnline assignment
Online assignment
 
Cooperative learning teaching method
Cooperative learning teaching methodCooperative learning teaching method
Cooperative learning teaching method
 
Constructivist Methods of Teaching and Learning
Constructivist Methods of Teaching and LearningConstructivist Methods of Teaching and Learning
Constructivist Methods of Teaching and Learning
 
Cooperativelearning
CooperativelearningCooperativelearning
Cooperativelearning
 
Active learning strategies-1
Active learning strategies-1Active learning strategies-1
Active learning strategies-1
 
Cooperative2
Cooperative2Cooperative2
Cooperative2
 
Cooperative2
Cooperative2Cooperative2
Cooperative2
 
Cooperative learning
Cooperative learningCooperative learning
Cooperative learning
 
Cooperative Language Learning Approach
Cooperative Language Learning ApproachCooperative Language Learning Approach
Cooperative Language Learning Approach
 
Cooperative learning
Cooperative learningCooperative learning
Cooperative learning
 
cooperative learning Nalibaeva.ppt
cooperative learning Nalibaeva.pptcooperative learning Nalibaeva.ppt
cooperative learning Nalibaeva.ppt
 
Cooperative Learning
Cooperative LearningCooperative Learning
Cooperative Learning
 
Cooperative learning
Cooperative learningCooperative learning
Cooperative learning
 
overview of structure in cooperative learning
overview of structure in cooperative learningoverview of structure in cooperative learning
overview of structure in cooperative learning
 
Peer To Peer Learning 10 7 09f1
Peer To Peer Learning 10 7 09f1Peer To Peer Learning 10 7 09f1
Peer To Peer Learning 10 7 09f1
 
Cooperative learning
Cooperative learningCooperative learning
Cooperative learning
 

Dernier

Dernier (20)

Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdfMicro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
 
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POSHow to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
 
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning PresentationSOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
Kodo Millet PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...
Kodo Millet  PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...Kodo Millet  PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...
Kodo Millet PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...
 
Exploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptx
Exploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptxExploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptx
Exploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptx
 
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
 
Unit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdf
Unit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdfUnit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdf
Unit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdf
 
REMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptx
REMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptxREMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptx
REMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptx
 
Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...
Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...
Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...
 
Sensory_Experience_and_Emotional_Resonance_in_Gabriel_Okaras_The_Piano_and_Th...
Sensory_Experience_and_Emotional_Resonance_in_Gabriel_Okaras_The_Piano_and_Th...Sensory_Experience_and_Emotional_Resonance_in_Gabriel_Okaras_The_Piano_and_Th...
Sensory_Experience_and_Emotional_Resonance_in_Gabriel_Okaras_The_Piano_and_Th...
 
Plant propagation: Sexual and Asexual propapagation.pptx
Plant propagation: Sexual and Asexual propapagation.pptxPlant propagation: Sexual and Asexual propapagation.pptx
Plant propagation: Sexual and Asexual propapagation.pptx
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning ExhibitSociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 
Google Gemini An AI Revolution in Education.pptx
Google Gemini An AI Revolution in Education.pptxGoogle Gemini An AI Revolution in Education.pptx
Google Gemini An AI Revolution in Education.pptx
 
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptxCOMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 

Cooperative Learning in Special Education

  • 2. Content 1. Introduction 2. Defination 3. History 4. Types 5. Elements 6. Techniques 7. Benefits 8. Advantages and Disadvantages 9. Review of Literature.
  • 3. Introduction  Cooperative Learning can be defined as collaboration in an instructional setting either between or among members of small groups that achieves learning outcomes, including ability to remember and utilize what is learned  Students work together in small groups and learn through interaction with each other while the teacher coaches the process.  Cooperative Learning is part of a group of teaching/learning techniques where students interact with each other to acquire and practice the elements of a subject matter and to meet common learning goals.
  • 4. DEFINITION • Cooperative learning involves students working together in small groups to accomplish shared goals. (Gillies, R., 2007) • Successful cooperative learning tasks as intellectually demanding, creative, open-ended, and involve higher order thinking tasks. (Ross and Smyth., 1995)
  • 5. History • Prior to World War II, social theorists such as Allport, Watson, Shaw, and Mead began establishing cooperative learning theory after finding that group work was more effective and efficient in quantity, quality, and overall productivity when compared to working alone. • However, it wasn’t until 1937 when researchers May and Doob found that people who cooperate and work together to achieve shared goals, were more successful in attaining outcomes, than those who strived independently to complete the same goals
  • 6. TYPES OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING Formal cooperative learning Informal cooperative learning Group based learning
  • 7. Types Formal cooperative learning is structured, facilitated, and monitored by the educator over time and is used to achieve group goals in task work (e.g. completing a unit). Any course material or assignment can be adapted to this type of learning, and groups can vary from 2-6 people with discussions lasting from a few minutes up to an entire period.
  • 8. Conti….. Informal cooperative learning incorporates group learning with passive teaching by drawing attention to material through small groups throughout the lesson or by discussion at the end of a lesson. These groups are often temporary and can change from lesson to lesson
  • 9. Group based learning • In group-based cooperative learning, these peer groups gather together over the long to develop and contribute to one another’s knowledge mastery on a topic by regularly discussing material, encouraging one another, and supporting the academic and personal success of group members. • Base group learning is effective for learning complex subject matter over the course or semester and establishes caring, supportive peer relationships, which in turn motivates and strengthens the student’s commitment to the group’s education while increasing self-esteem and self- worth.
  • 10. Effective Cooperative Learning Groups 5 Elements 1. Positive Interdependence 2. Individual and group Accountability 3. Face-To-Face Interaction 4. Interpersonal and small group skills 5. Group Processing(reflection)
  • 11. Positive Interdependence  Task and goals are clearly defined  Efforts of each team member benefits the individual as well as the group  Commitment made to both personal as well as group success  Students must fully participate and put forth effort within their group  Each group member has a task/role/responsibility therefore must believe that they are responsible for their learning and that of their group.
  • 12. Individual and Group Accountability  Each group member will be held accountable for your share of the work and mastering the learning.  Each team member must contribute to the group as a whole  Each team member is accountable for helping the group to reach its goals  Each student must demonstrate mastery of the content being studied
  • 13. Face-To-Face Interaction • Promote one another success by sharing resources • Encourage, help, and applaud each other effort’s • Support one another academically and personally • Explain how to solve problems • Teach each other • Check’s for one another understanding • Discuss concept being learned • Connect present with past learning • Foster the group mutual goal
  • 14. Interpersonal and small group skills  Each team member must: • Be motivated • Provide effective leadership • Be able to make decisions • Be able to build trusts • Be able to communicate • Be able to manage conflict
  • 15. Group processing(reflection)  Students : • Communicate openly, freely, respectfully discussing their concern • Maintain effective working relationship • Describe what member actions are helpful • Make decisions about behaviours to continue/change/discontinue • Process status of goal achievement and accomplishment
  • 16. Techniques Jigsaw Think-Pair-Share Three-Step Interview Round Robin Brainstorming Three-minute Review Numbered Heads Book Ends
  • 17. Jigsaw • Group students into sets of five. Assign unique information to learn to each group member. After reading the material, instruct group members to take turns teaching their material to their teammates.
  • 18. Think-Pair-Share • Pose a question, and ask students to think about its answer. Instruct students to pair off and take turns explaining their answers to each other.
  • 19. • This is a four-step discussion strategy that incorporates wait time and aspects of cooperative learning. Students (and teachers) learn to LISTEN while a question is posed, THINK (without raising hands) of a response, PAIR with a neighbor to discuss responses, and SHARE their responses with the whole class. Time limits and transition cues help discussion move smoothly. Students are able to rehearse responses mentally and verbally, and all students have an opportunity to talk. Both students and teachers have increased opportunities to think and become involved in group discussion. (Lyman)
  • 20. Three-Step Interview • Group students into pairs. In step one, ask individuals to interview their partners. In step two, ask partners to reverse roles. In step three, select a few students to explain their partners’ answer to the entire class.
  • 21. • This involves structured group activity with students. Using interviews/listening techniques that have been modeled; one student interviews another about an announced topic. "en time is up, students switch roles as interviewer and interviewee. Pairs then join to form groups of four. Students take turns introducing their pair partners and sharing what the pair partners had to say. This structure can be used as a team builder, and also for opinion questions, predicting, evaluation, sharing book reports, etc. (Kagan)
  • 22. Round Robin Brainstorming •Group students into sets of four or five each, and instruct each group to appoint a recorder. Pose a question having several answers. Have group members think silently about responses and then take turns sharing their ideas with the others in the group. Ask group members not to criticize one another's responses. Instruct the recorder to write down the ideas. After a few minutes, stop the discussions, and select a member of each group to read the recorder’s list aloud.
  • 23. • Roundtable can be used for brainstorming, reviewing, or practicing while also serving as a team builder. Sequential form: • Students sit in teams of 3 or more, with one piece of paper and one pencil. The teacher asks a question which has multiple answers. Students take turns writing one answer on the paper, then passing the paper and pencil clockwise to the next person. When time is called, teams with the most correct answers are recognized. Teams reflect on their strategies and consider ways they could improve. Simultaneous form: Each student starts a piece of paper, writes one answer, and passes it, so several papers are moving at once. (Kagan)
  • 24. Three-minute Review • Pause during or at the end of a lecture or discussion. Ask students to work with partners to summarize the lecture or discussion. After three minutes, call on a few students to share their group’s summary with the class.
  • 25. Numbered Heads • Group students into sets of four, and number the members of each group one through four. Give the groups questions to answer. Ask each group to decide upon an answer, and call on all persons with a certain number to take turns reporting to the class.
  • 26. • This structure is useful for quickly reviewing objective material in a fun way. The students in each team are numbered (each team might have 4 students numbered 1, 2, 3, 4). Students coach each other on material to be mastered. Teachers pose a question and call a number. Only the students with that number are eligible to answer and earn points for their team, building both individual accountability and positive interdependence. This may be done with only one student in the class responding (sequential form), or with all the numbers, 3's for instance, responding using an Every Pupil Response technique such as cards or hand signals (simultaneous form). (Kagan)
  • 27. Book Ends • Ask students to pair up. Give them a topic, and tell them to spend a couple of minutes deciding how to teach that topic to their partners. After giving participants time to think, invite them to take turns teaching the topic to their partners.
  • 29. Cooperative Learning Benefits Cooperative Learning teaching techniques facilitate learning and memory by: • Ensuring attention through active student participation • Adding meaning and relevance to the material • Enabling students to learn from “modeling” or through observation of others • Students of all ability levels show higher academic achievement when taught using cooperative learning techniques as opposed to traditional techniques. • Encouraging student participation through expectation of rewards - desire to avoid possible punishments
  • 30. Advantages and Disadvantages of cooperative learning
  • 31. Advantages • It has been shown to have a positive effect on student learning when compared to individual or competitive conditions • It has the potential to produce a level of engagement that other forms of learning cannot • Students may explain things better to another student than a teacher to a class. Students learn how to teach one another and explain material in their own words • Questions are more likely to be asked and answered in a group setting Disadvantages • A burden is making the students responsible for each other’s learning apart from themselves • One study showed that in groups of mixed ability, low-achieving students become passive and do not focus on the task • Depending on an individual’s motivation and interest on a particular subject that will determine how well they would learn • Low achiver become Puzzled Because of so many questions
  • 33. • Maureen and keri (2002) • examined the effect of a cooperative learning programs on the social acceptance of children with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities by young children without disabilities. • Sample size was 51 MMR. Random sampling method was taken for the selection of the sample. Children without disabilities were assigned to a cooperative learning programme or a social contact programme, which are taken as the control group. • The result of the study indicated that the cooperative learning treatments resulted In positive changes in several indices in the social acceptance of the children with moderate and severe intellectual disabilities by their peers without disabilities.
  • 34.  Robert Slavin (1994)  Student Team Learning -Slavin defines cooperative learning as “instructional programs in which students work in small groups to help one another master academic content. Through his review of the literature on cooperative learning, Slavin identifies three concepts that are fundamental to all cooperative learning/Student Team Learning techniques: 1. Students are rewarded as a team but are graded individually. 2. The team’s success is not conditionally based on individual performance of one student. All students must help each other to achieve learning goals. 3. All students are expected to improve based on their own previous performance, thus ensuring all students are challenged to do their best.
  • 35. Spencer Kagan (1989) • Recommend that teachers use the “structural approach” to cooperative learning, which involves “content-free ways of organizing social interaction in the classroom. • The strategy of cooperative learning was developed as a means to reduce competition in American schools, which James Coleman (1959) identified as a negative component of the education system. Coleman suggests that instead of encouraging competition in the academic setting, “which effectively impedes the process of education,” schools should introduce a more collaborative approach to teaching.