1. Harokopion
University
of
Athens
(HUA)
What
targets
and
what
target
stakeholders
would
we
like
to
address
and
reach?
andoulaki
Miranda
D
KNOW-‐4-‐DRR
Kick-‐off
Mee=ng,
11
and
12
June
2013,
POLIMI,
Milano,
Italy
2. “Stakeholders”
(IRGC,
2005)
Socially
organised
groups
that
are
or
will
be
affected
by:
•
the
outcome
of
the
event
or
the
acGvity
from
which
the
risk
originates
and/or
• the
risk
management
op=ons
taken
to
counter
the
risk.
3. Other
groups
that
may
also
have
a
role
Scien=fic
communiGes
Professional
bodies
The
media
Cultural
elites
and
opinion
leaders
The
non-‐organised
affected
public
and
the
non-‐organised
observing
public
• Charity
agents,
NGOs
•
•
•
•
•
4. “Stakeholders”
(Glicken,
2000)
An
individual
or
a
group
•
influenced
by
or
• with
the
ability
to
significantly
impact
(either
directly
or
indirectly)
the
topical
area
of
interest
5. Knowledge
developed
by
different
groups
Public sector
Civil society
scientists
scientists
Private sector
Private sector
Public sector
Civil society
6. Disciplines
and
professional
bodies:
PercepGon
of
their
involvement
in
earthquake
miGgaGon
Structural engineers
Urban planners
Geoscientists
7. Role
and
interac=on
of
different
disciplines
and
professionals
Structural
engineers
Geoscientists
Planners
Institutional frames, practice and experience, training and education
10. Stakeholders
public
sector
Hellenic
Nati onal
Meteorological
Serv ice
Forest
Special
Secretariat
of
the
Ministry
of
Environment,
Energy
&
Climate
Change
General
Directorate
for
the
Development
and
Protection
of
Forests
and
Natural
Env ironment
The
Hellenic
Fire
Brigades
(HFB)
Instit utions
as
Argyroupo lis
Centre
for
Env ironmental
Edu cation
(ACEE)
Central
Government-‐
Central
Ministries
Prefectural
Authority
International
Organizations
scientists
studying
climat e
change
recovery
planning
a nd
the
reconstruction
private
sector
Donations
Private
developers-‐
Investors
Contractors
and
Suppliers
Civil
society
Media
NGO's-‐n onprofit
organizations
11. Stakeholders
in
a
golf
resort
planning
&
approval
-‐
Environmental
dispute
case
12. EQ Risk Reduction:
From knowledge to action
Aim: identifying the needs of
actors in EQ risk reduction
(scientific communities,
policy-makes & practitioners)
as regards scientific and
technical tools and resources
Source:
GeoHazards
Int.
and
Colorado
State
University
(2012).
Understanding
GEM’s
PotenGal
Beneficiaries:
A
Study
of
Earthquake
Risk
ReducGon
AcGviGes,
Needs,
and
Barriers
15. Iden=fying
the
stakeholders
(1)
“…
are
or
will
be
affected
by
the
hazardous
event
or
process
or
ac8vity
from
which
risk
originates…”
What
are
the
possible
consequences
in
terms
of
who
will
suffer
what
(damage,
loss,
tangible,
intangible)
where
and
when.
SpaGal
–
temporal
dimensions
/
Uncertainty
Knowledge
is
essenGal
for
idenGfying
the
stakeholders.
16. Iden=fying
the
stakeholders
(2)
“…
are
or
will
be
affected
by
the
risk
management
op8ons”
• Long
term
–
short
term
measures
for
DRR
• Structural
v
non-‐structural
/
Soa
v
hard
measures
• Mainstreaming
disaster
risk
reducGon
• DRR
and/within
sustainable
development
• Global
to
local
scales
• Shiaing
risk
to
future
generaGons,
shiaing
risk
from
one
part
of
the
world
to
the
other,
shiaing
risk
from
one
social
group
to
the
other
• Risk
sharing
Knowledge
is
essenGal
for
idenGfying
the
stakeholders.
17. Selec=on
and
inclusion
• Who
selects
who
is
included
in
decision
making
and
implementaGon
and
how?
• How
urgency
affects
this?
Hierarchical
versus
problem
solving
models
of
emergency
management
• Can
one
include
in
stakeholders
also
these
who
are
assigned
with
the
task
to
define
and
propose
policy
opGons
and
these
who
are
in
risk
management
business?
18. Decision
making,
policy
making
and
implementa=on
processes:
Issues
to
discuss
• Who
plays
a
role,
what
role,
at
what
stage
of
the
process,
how
informaGon
and
knowledge
affects
this
role,
significance
of
the
role
• Knowledge
flows
within
the
process:
actors,
sources,
type,
means
and
tools
• IntenGons
and
interests
associated
with
using
the
knowledge
• Place
of
knowledge
within
the
process
• Useful,
usable
and
used
knowledge
19. • Bridging
the
gap
between
knowing
and
doing
takes
more
then
knowledge
• Explore
a
spectrum
of
tools
to
enable
knowledge
and
focus
on
facilitaGng
the
development/selecGon
of
the
tool/approach
most
appropriate
for
the
specific
case
• Use
the
project
itself
as
a
case
to
see
how
an
issue
is
negoGated,
facilitated
and
implemented.
20.
What
targets
and
what
target
stakeholders
would
we
like
to
address
and
reach?