Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Group 4 Progress report
1. T h e Y o u n g P i n a y ’s
S e x L i f e -- Wh a t ’s
Mo m a n d G o d G o t T o
Individual Religiosity and hMother-Daughter Sexual
D o Wi t I t ?
Communication on the Sexual Knowledge, Sexual Attitude,
and Sexual Behavior of Young Adult Filipinas in Private /
Public Schools
FLORES, Mara
JOCSON, Jean
SODUSTA, Hannah
YLAGAN, Kriska
2. PARTICIPANTS and SETTINGS
PRE-TEST at Eulogio Amang Rodriquez Institute of Science
and Technology (EARIST)
Proposal
- 60 female young adults
- 18 – 23 years old
- Classroom (comfortable, conducive, quiet)
- No time limit
3. Actual
- 60 female participants
- Classroom
- Air Conditioned, conducive, quiet
4. ACTUAL TEST at Mapua Institute of Technology
PROPOSAL
- 60 female participants
- 18 – 23 years old
- Classroom (comfortable, conducive, quiet)
- No time limit
5. ACTUAL
- 60 participants
- Classroom
- Air Conditioned, conducive, quiet
6. INSTRUMENTS
PRE-TEST RESULTS (Reliability)
• Religiosity Measure Scale (RMS) = .786
• Sexual Knowledge Scale (SKS) = .823
• Sexual Communication Scale (SCS) = .792
• Sexual Attitude and Experience Scale (SAES)
• Sexual Behavior = .902
• Sexual Attitude = .950
7. REVISIONS IN INSTRUMENTS
* Before the pre-test
• SKS was replaced & done by Dr. Gellynck
* After the pre-test
• Changed the format of the scales
• Rephrased some items in the scales
• Deleted one item in the SKS
8. DATA GATHERING
PRE-TEST
- Two (2) sets
- 1st set: all scales at the same time
- 2nd set: one scale at a time
- Introduction
- Instructions
- Answering of scales
- Passing of papers
- Debriefing
ACTUL TEST
- We chose set 1: give all scales at the same time then
follow the same procedure and flow.
9. REVISIONS IN THE PROCEDURE
• Consent form
• Change “mother’s status” to “Is your mother living or
deceased?”
• Follow-up question: If living, are you residing with your
mother?
• Debriefing Statement
• Debriefing will not be discussed anymore as a group,
we’ll just be giving them their own copies of the
debriefing statement with contact information when
they are finish answering the questionnaires.
10. REFLECTIONS
• What facilitated your data gathering?
• Accommodating and cooperative school heads,
faculty and students
• What hindered your data gathering?
• Few female students per class
• Some faculty were absent during the actual test
• Students hurrying to go back to what they are
doing
11. SOLUTION
• Decided to have five (5) groups of participants
instead of just two (2)
• Waited for the teachers to be available
• Have the debriefing statement printed and be
given to the participants afterwards
12. INDIVIDUAL INSIGHT
The data gathering that we are doing right now made me more
responsible and independent. Responsible in a way that I have to
continuously communicate with the different school heads / deans
for the schedule of the actual test that we’ll be conducting in their
respective schools/colleges. I have also become somehow
independent because there were instances that I have to go to the
different schools by myself.
Another lesson I’ve learned was that I have to manage my time and
balance everything I have to do. I have also learned to become
more patient and assertive when talking to the different school
heads. I can’t always get what I want. I need to work hard for
everything I am aiming for.
- Mara Flores
13. • I learned that Patience is really a virtue. From going to different
universities, meeting new people, set a schedule for the pre-
test and actual test, and spending money for fares, food and
other expenses like printing, it was a challenge for me to widen
and lengthen my patience in that kind of situation. I
experienced tiredness, exhaustion and it came to a point that I
want to give up. But still, I look into a positive way. I know there
is always someone who will inspire us to fulfill our goals and
task on time. I believe that it’s not how fast we finish the thesis,
but it’s how we make it be a good example for the future
researcher (quality).
- Jean Jocson
16. •Reflections
• Sometimes I see our participants hurriedly
answering the tests they have been given
although they have been given time to answer.
• Participants talking while taking the test
• Some details about the results, so far.
17. •Revisions
• Shorter introduction
• Debriefing: Hand out debriefing sheet with contact
details after survey is submitted.
• Change “Status of Parent” in Participant Consent Form
• Replace it with: “Is your mother living [check box] or
deceased [check box]
• Add: If living are you presently living with your mother? Yes
[check box], No [check box]
• Add if no: How often do you interact with your mother?
____
• Religiosity Scale
• Remove repeated option – “More than once a week”
• Replace it with a “Never” option
18. •Timeline
• August 1, 2012 – Giving letters to PNU, PUP
• August 2, 2012 – Giving letters to PLM and
UMAK
• August 3-4, 2012 – Data gathering in UP
• August 6-15, 2012 – Finish data gathering in
• PUP
• PNU
• UMAK
• PLM
19. •TIMEline
• August 15-22, 2012
• Encoding of scores
• Writing of Chapter 3