2. Developing a “psychological
perspective” on teaching
Understanding learning and
development in school (and out)
E.g. Learning in V out of school
(Resnick, 1987)
Become more aware of your own
and learning and development as
basis for supporting that of others in
schools
P Conway, PDE @ UCC 2
3. Some of the topics to be
addressed
Changing social context of adolescence
Family, school-work, globalisation, ICTs
Ability, ‘intelligence’ and achievement
Motivation: that of students & teachers
Technologies: tools to amplify the mind
Promoting well-being (including mental
health)
The ‘good teacher’
Different schools of psychology:
(psychodynamic), behaviorist, cognitive,
socio-cultural, (neuro-psychological,
evolutionary)
P Conway, PDE @ UCC 3
5. Developing a “psychological
perspective”
A psychological perspective has the potential
to help us be more thoughtful, effective,
caring & ethical as professional educators
Psychology: a very significant influence in/on
education in the last 100 years
E.g. the ‘self’ alphabet, ‘mastery’, teaching
≠ learning, IQ tests, core conditions for human
change, stages & critical periods, emotional
intelligence(s), stereotype threat, FCL, motivation
(incl. praise), teacher knowledge
Different schools of psychology have (very)
different ways of thinking about teaching,
learning and development
P Conway, PDE @ UCC 5
8. Novice-experts and
professional knowledge
Experts in any area or profession
have deep and flexible knowledge
(Berliner, 2004), e.g.
The 10,000 hour rule & deliberate
practice (with coaching)
Comparisons between novice and
experts in various professions and
activities
P Conway, PDE @ UCC 8
9. What do teachers need to
know?
Teacher knowledge (Shulman, 1987)
Content knowledge
General pedagogical knowledge
Curriculum knowledge
Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK)
Knowledge of learners & their culture
Educational contexts/settings
Goals & purposes of teaching
Technology pedagogical content knowledge
(TPCK) (Mishra et al, 2004)
Knowledge of self (Grossman, 1995)
P Conway, PDE @ UCC 9
10. Are the so-called foundations
‘foundational’?
Myth of technical rationality, I.e. an
applied science view based on
flawed ‘transfer’ assumption
(Peterson et al, 1991)
Moving from a rational technical to
reflective practice
Knowledge for teaching
Knowledge in teaching
Knowledge of teaching (Cochran-
Smith & Lytle, 1999)
P Conway, PDE @ UCC 10
11. A cautious optimism
“Psychology ought certainly to give
the teacher radical help. And yet I
confess that, acquainted as I am
with the height of your expectations,
I feel a little anxious lest, at the end
of these simple talks of mine, not a
few of you may experience some
disappointment at the net results….”
William James, (1892) Talks to
Teachers, p. 22
P Conway, PDE @ UCC 11
12. “An intermediary inventive
mind”
“Psychology is a science, and
teaching is an art; and sciences
never generate arts directly out of
themselves. An intermediary
inventive mind must make the
application, by using its originality”
James, 1892, p. 24
P Conway, PDE @ UCC 12