SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  24
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
McCarthy Tétrault Advance™
Building Capabilities for Growth




HOT TOPICS IN CLASS ACTIONS

Defending Class Actions in Canada,
3rd Edition

 February 9, 2012


McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
2




                                                 SESSION 1

            Class Actions –The Big Picture
               British Columbia In Flux


                                 Andrew Wilkinson, Q.C.




McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
15 Years of Class Actions in BC                                               3



¬ BC was early in Canada (1996)
¬ Class Proceedings Act provides for rep plaintiff to
  apply to “certify” entire class
¬ Sometimes defendants like to be certified to
  ensure capture of all claims
¬ QC process (“authorization”) very different, with
  no appeal for defendants




  McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
Certification Criteria                                                          4



¬   Cause of Action (including novel claims)
¬   Identifiable class
¬   Common issues
¬   Preferable procedure
¬   Rep plaintiff adequately represents class
¬   Workable litigation plan

    US criteria are more restrictive than Canadian



    McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
Role of BC in Canadian Class Actions                                          5



¬ “National” classes still controversial in Canada
¬ BC was a local market until recently - “opt out”
  made ON and QC more attractive to plaintiffs
¬ BC now seen as more plaintiff friendly
  ¬ ? lower thresholds for certification
¬ Organized plaintiff bar means co-ordinated
  actions across Canada
¬ US actions often lead by example



  McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
Proposed Amendments to                                                          6

B.C. Class Proceedings Act
¬   Only BC, NB and NF are “opt in”
¬   SK and AB changed to “opt out”
¬   CBA proposes that BC change to “opt out”
¬   With no costs against plaintiffs, would make BC
    attractive to national class plaintiffs




    McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
7




                                                 SESSION 2

        Winning the war before it begins:
           Pre-certification strategies


                                                 Miranda Lam




McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
8




McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
You’ve been sued … now what?                                                  9



¬ Legal considerations:
  ¬ Choice of defence counsel
  ¬ Defeating the claim on a preliminary basis
          ¬ Jurisdiction
          ¬ Other dispute resolution mechanisms
          ¬ Nature of the claim
          ¬ Opposing certification
  ¬ Defence on the merits
  ¬ Settlement


  McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
Preliminary Steps: Challenge Jurisdiction                                     10



¬ In British Columbia, only residents are
  automatically included in the class unless they
  opt out
¬ Issues:
  ¬ Conflict of laws
          ¬ Court Jurisdiction and Transfer of Proceedings Act
          ¬ “real and substantial connection” codified
  ¬ Constitutional: can provincial legislation have
    extra-provincial effect?
  ¬ Practical and strategic implications

  McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
Preliminary Steps: Challenge the                                              11

Dispute Resolution Mechanism
¬ Mandatory Arbitration
       Where the subject matter of the proposed class
       action is an agreement or relates to one, and the
       agreement contains an arbitration clause requiring
       that any disputes under it be resolved by
       arbitration, a defendant may be entitled to apply to
       have any court proceedings stayed.
       N.B. Breaches of consumer protection legislation
       are not subject to arbitration.



  McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
Preliminary Steps: Challenge the                                                12

Nature of the Claim
¬   Cause of action
¬   Motion for particulars
¬   Security for costs
¬   Summary judgment and summary trial




    McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
Oppose Certification                                                                                        13



¬ OPPOSE:                                                               ¬ CONSENT:
  ¬ Failure to meet criteria                                                  ¬ Strong case on the merits
  ¬ Incomplete pleadings                                                      ¬ Conditional consent as
  ¬ Substantive defence on                                                      precursor to settlement
    the merits                                                                ¬ Significant individual
  ¬ Strategic positioning                                                       claims that would be
                                                                                costly to defend
                                                                                separately
                                                                              ¬ Leverage
                                                                              ¬ Appetite and resources to
                                                                                litigate



  McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
Avoiding Class Actions                                                        14



¬ Robust Risk Management
  ¬ Review processes and policies associated with
    handling customer complaints and identification of
    issues
  ¬ Review internal policies to ensure currency and
    responsiveness (HR, safety, environmental,
    confidentiality)
  ¬ Consistent communication – internal and
    externally
¬ Agreements
  ¬ Mandatory arbitration clauses?
  McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
15




                                                 SESSION 3

               Trends in B.C. Class Actions:
                  Our World Is Changing


                                                       Jill Yates




McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
Types of Claims are Changing                                                   16



¬ BPCPA – BC’s consumer protection legislation
   ¬ Various benefits for plaintiffs, including:
           ¬ aggressive remedies in some cases
           ¬ insulation from arbitration in some cases
¬ Waiver of Tort
   ¬ either cause of action or remedy
   ¬ various benefits for plaintiffs
¬ Plaintiffs looking for opportunities to plead both of
  these


   McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
Certification Standards are Changing                                          17



¬ Getting tougher to get certified in US
¬ Easier to get certified in Ontario
¬ Easier to get certified in B.C.
  ¬ Many courts are not strict about the requirements
    of the CPA
          ¬ e.g. Wakelam v. Johnson & Johnson et al.
          ¬ e.g. Steele v. Toyota Canada Inc.
  ¬ Courts are taking a “certify now, worry later”
    approach


  McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
Scope is Changing                                                             18



¬ National/Cross-border classes are becoming
  more common, including in B.C.
  ¬ The majority of our class actions are part of/
    extensions of/ copies of claims in other
    jurisdictions
  ¬ It has been proposed that B.C.’s legislation be
    amended to allow for national classes
  ¬ Working toward a Judicial Cooperation Protocol in
    Canada



  McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
How We Defend is Changing                                                     19



¬ Courts have stated that it may often be
  appropriate for defendants to file a defence
  before certification – and some judges are
  requiring it
¬ Some courts are allowing pre-certification
  motions (e.g. pleadings, summary trials)
¬ Certification is no longer the end of the litigation
  process in a class action – cases are increasingly
  continuing beyond certification and some are
  going to trial

  McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
20




                                                 SESSION 4

         Class Action Quirks:
Limitations Periods in “Trust” Claims
         Aggregate Damages
  AND Contribution after Settlement
                                             Warren Milman




McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
Limitation Periods                                                             21



¬ Most Provinces: 2 years, subject to
  “discoverability”
¬ BC – Special case for claims seeking
  disgorgement of “trust funds” (e.g., waiver of tort)
¬ Law reform: relief is in sight?




   McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
Aggregate Damages                                                             22



¬ Traditional rule – can’t use CPA to create new
  substantive liability
¬ New rule: CPA allows class-wide damages to be
  aggregated so that class members need not
  show loss or injury
¬ Punishment vs. compensation
¬ Cy-prés awards




  McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
Contribution                                                                   23

- is settlement really the end?

¬ Rights of contribution for joint and several liability
¬ Bar orders and covenants not to sue
¬ Conspiracy claims?




   McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
VANCOUVER                                      MONTRÉAL
Suite 1300, 777 Dunsmuir Street                Suite 2500
P.O. Box 10424, Pacific Centre                 1000 De La Gauchetière Street West
Vancouver BC V7Y 1K2                           Montréal QC H3B 0A2
Tel: 604-643-7100                              Tel: 514-397-4100
Fax: 604-643-7900                              Fax: 514-875-6246
Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711                      Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711

CALGARY                                        QUÉBEC
Suite 3300, 421 7th Avenue SW                  Le Complexe St-Amable
Calgary AB T2P 4K9                             1150, rue de Claire-Fontaine, 7e étage
Tel: 403-260-3500                              Québec QC G1R 5G4
Fax: 403-260-3501                              Tel: 418-521-3000
Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711                      Fax: 418-521-3099
                                               Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711
TORONTO
Box 48, Suite 5300                             UNITED KINGDOM & EUROPE
Toronto Dominion Bank Tower                    125 Old Broad Street, 26th Floor
Toronto ON M5K 1E6                             London EC2N 1AR
Tel: 416-362-1812                              UNITED KINGDOM
Fax: 416-868-0673                              Tel: +44 (0)20 7786 5700
Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711                      Fax: +44 (0)20 7786 5702




McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID
#11150233

Contenu connexe

Tendances

In Dire Need of Resolution
In Dire Need of ResolutionIn Dire Need of Resolution
In Dire Need of ResolutionRoland Schroeder
 
Meet the Adjudicator
Meet the Adjudicator Meet the Adjudicator
Meet the Adjudicator NiallLawless
 
Walt Metz Legal Projects Portfolio
Walt Metz Legal Projects PortfolioWalt Metz Legal Projects Portfolio
Walt Metz Legal Projects PortfolioWalt Metz
 
The Supreme Court and Your Business
The Supreme Court and Your BusinessThe Supreme Court and Your Business
The Supreme Court and Your BusinessWinston & Strawn LLP
 
Non-compete Agreements: Analysis and Drafting
Non-compete Agreements:  Analysis and DraftingNon-compete Agreements:  Analysis and Drafting
Non-compete Agreements: Analysis and DraftingDavid Kight
 
Class Actions Trends - An Overview of Recent Trends Involving Class Actions
Class Actions Trends - An Overview of Recent Trends Involving Class Actions Class Actions Trends - An Overview of Recent Trends Involving Class Actions
Class Actions Trends - An Overview of Recent Trends Involving Class Actions Rachel Hamilton
 
The Practical Side of Bankruptcy
The Practical Side of BankruptcyThe Practical Side of Bankruptcy
The Practical Side of BankruptcyAnthony Kelley
 
PCC Seminar Oct 2011
PCC Seminar  Oct 2011PCC Seminar  Oct 2011
PCC Seminar Oct 2011GRANT JONES
 
Looking forward in international arbitration
Looking forward in international arbitration Looking forward in international arbitration
Looking forward in international arbitration Rebecca Davis
 
Olswang Construction Law Masterclass - October 2014 - Liqudated Damages and P...
Olswang Construction Law Masterclass - October 2014 - Liqudated Damages and P...Olswang Construction Law Masterclass - October 2014 - Liqudated Damages and P...
Olswang Construction Law Masterclass - October 2014 - Liqudated Damages and P...Francis Ho
 
NURSING_HOMES_AND_THE_FINE_PRINT
NURSING_HOMES_AND_THE_FINE_PRINTNURSING_HOMES_AND_THE_FINE_PRINT
NURSING_HOMES_AND_THE_FINE_PRINTDuncan Garnett
 

Tendances (13)

In Dire Need of Resolution
In Dire Need of ResolutionIn Dire Need of Resolution
In Dire Need of Resolution
 
Meet the Adjudicator
Meet the Adjudicator Meet the Adjudicator
Meet the Adjudicator
 
Walt Metz Legal Projects Portfolio
Walt Metz Legal Projects PortfolioWalt Metz Legal Projects Portfolio
Walt Metz Legal Projects Portfolio
 
The Supreme Court and Your Business
The Supreme Court and Your BusinessThe Supreme Court and Your Business
The Supreme Court and Your Business
 
UK Adjudicators 2021 London Adjudication & Arbitration Conference pack
UK Adjudicators 2021 London Adjudication & Arbitration Conference packUK Adjudicators 2021 London Adjudication & Arbitration Conference pack
UK Adjudicators 2021 London Adjudication & Arbitration Conference pack
 
Non-compete Agreements: Analysis and Drafting
Non-compete Agreements:  Analysis and DraftingNon-compete Agreements:  Analysis and Drafting
Non-compete Agreements: Analysis and Drafting
 
Class Actions Trends - An Overview of Recent Trends Involving Class Actions
Class Actions Trends - An Overview of Recent Trends Involving Class Actions Class Actions Trends - An Overview of Recent Trends Involving Class Actions
Class Actions Trends - An Overview of Recent Trends Involving Class Actions
 
The Practical Side of Bankruptcy
The Practical Side of BankruptcyThe Practical Side of Bankruptcy
The Practical Side of Bankruptcy
 
PCC Seminar Oct 2011
PCC Seminar  Oct 2011PCC Seminar  Oct 2011
PCC Seminar Oct 2011
 
Looking forward in international arbitration
Looking forward in international arbitration Looking forward in international arbitration
Looking forward in international arbitration
 
Olswang Construction Law Masterclass - October 2014 - Liqudated Damages and P...
Olswang Construction Law Masterclass - October 2014 - Liqudated Damages and P...Olswang Construction Law Masterclass - October 2014 - Liqudated Damages and P...
Olswang Construction Law Masterclass - October 2014 - Liqudated Damages and P...
 
NURSING_HOMES_AND_THE_FINE_PRINT
NURSING_HOMES_AND_THE_FINE_PRINTNURSING_HOMES_AND_THE_FINE_PRINT
NURSING_HOMES_AND_THE_FINE_PRINT
 
UK Adjudicators March 2019 newsletter
UK Adjudicators March 2019 newsletterUK Adjudicators March 2019 newsletter
UK Adjudicators March 2019 newsletter
 

Similaire à BC Class Actions Trends

Avoiding Shareholder Disputes
Avoiding Shareholder DisputesAvoiding Shareholder Disputes
Avoiding Shareholder DisputesMiranda Lam
 
Deals Making And Breaking Them (May 2011)
Deals   Making And Breaking Them (May 2011)Deals   Making And Breaking Them (May 2011)
Deals Making And Breaking Them (May 2011)Miranda Lam
 
Developer's Disclosure Obligations under REDMA
Developer's Disclosure Obligations under REDMADeveloper's Disclosure Obligations under REDMA
Developer's Disclosure Obligations under REDMAjcytrynbaum
 
Developers disclosure obligations_redma
Developers disclosure obligations_redmaDevelopers disclosure obligations_redma
Developers disclosure obligations_redmavwigmore
 
Offsets in Defence Procurement in Canada - Considerations
Offsets in Defence Procurement in Canada - ConsiderationsOffsets in Defence Procurement in Canada - Considerations
Offsets in Defence Procurement in Canada - ConsiderationsBrenda Swick
 
Sookman law society IP in social media
Sookman law society IP in social mediaSookman law society IP in social media
Sookman law society IP in social mediabsookman
 
Sookman tclg year_in_review_2011
Sookman tclg year_in_review_2011Sookman tclg year_in_review_2011
Sookman tclg year_in_review_2011bsookman
 
Comparison Between Canadian And Us Class Actions Law And Practice
Comparison Between Canadian And Us Class Actions Law And PracticeComparison Between Canadian And Us Class Actions Law And Practice
Comparison Between Canadian And Us Class Actions Law And Practicejyatesdahlgren
 
Prevent and Resolve Telecom Disputes
Prevent and Resolve Telecom DisputesPrevent and Resolve Telecom Disputes
Prevent and Resolve Telecom Disputestelecomattorney
 
Karyn Branco CAU Article Trial Ready Defense
Karyn Branco CAU Article Trial Ready DefenseKaryn Branco CAU Article Trial Ready Defense
Karyn Branco CAU Article Trial Ready DefenseKaryn Branco
 
Government procurement obligations under the ceta
Government procurement obligations under the cetaGovernment procurement obligations under the ceta
Government procurement obligations under the cetaBrenda Swick
 
Non-competition and Non-solicitation Provisions
Non-competition and Non-solicitation ProvisionsNon-competition and Non-solicitation Provisions
Non-competition and Non-solicitation ProvisionsKevin Learned
 
Apportionment the netting off approach c
Apportionment the netting off approach cApportionment the netting off approach c
Apportionment the netting off approach cJeremy Fearnsides
 
Mitigating Litigation Risk at the Deal Table M&A Part II
Mitigating Litigation Risk at the Deal Table M&A Part II Mitigating Litigation Risk at the Deal Table M&A Part II
Mitigating Litigation Risk at the Deal Table M&A Part II Polsinelli PC
 
Diamond Fruit growers v. Krack Corp case brief
Diamond Fruit growers v. Krack Corp case briefDiamond Fruit growers v. Krack Corp case brief
Diamond Fruit growers v. Krack Corp case briefAnthony Lee
 
Basic Contract Law for PMs webinar Part 3: What to do when things go wrong or...
Basic Contract Law for PMs webinar Part 3: What to do when things go wrong or...Basic Contract Law for PMs webinar Part 3: What to do when things go wrong or...
Basic Contract Law for PMs webinar Part 3: What to do when things go wrong or...Association for Project Management
 
Default Judgments Presentation
Default Judgments PresentationDefault Judgments Presentation
Default Judgments PresentationD. Todd Smith
 

Similaire à BC Class Actions Trends (20)

Avoiding Shareholder Disputes
Avoiding Shareholder DisputesAvoiding Shareholder Disputes
Avoiding Shareholder Disputes
 
Deals Making And Breaking Them (May 2011)
Deals   Making And Breaking Them (May 2011)Deals   Making And Breaking Them (May 2011)
Deals Making And Breaking Them (May 2011)
 
Developer's Disclosure Obligations under REDMA
Developer's Disclosure Obligations under REDMADeveloper's Disclosure Obligations under REDMA
Developer's Disclosure Obligations under REDMA
 
Developers disclosure obligations_redma
Developers disclosure obligations_redmaDevelopers disclosure obligations_redma
Developers disclosure obligations_redma
 
Offsets in Defence Procurement in Canada - Considerations
Offsets in Defence Procurement in Canada - ConsiderationsOffsets in Defence Procurement in Canada - Considerations
Offsets in Defence Procurement in Canada - Considerations
 
Sookman law society IP in social media
Sookman law society IP in social mediaSookman law society IP in social media
Sookman law society IP in social media
 
Recent Developments in Hatch-Waxman Law
Recent Developments in Hatch-Waxman LawRecent Developments in Hatch-Waxman Law
Recent Developments in Hatch-Waxman Law
 
Sookman tclg year_in_review_2011
Sookman tclg year_in_review_2011Sookman tclg year_in_review_2011
Sookman tclg year_in_review_2011
 
Comparison Between Canadian And Us Class Actions Law And Practice
Comparison Between Canadian And Us Class Actions Law And PracticeComparison Between Canadian And Us Class Actions Law And Practice
Comparison Between Canadian And Us Class Actions Law And Practice
 
Prevent and Resolve Telecom Disputes
Prevent and Resolve Telecom DisputesPrevent and Resolve Telecom Disputes
Prevent and Resolve Telecom Disputes
 
Karyn Branco CAU Article Trial Ready Defense
Karyn Branco CAU Article Trial Ready DefenseKaryn Branco CAU Article Trial Ready Defense
Karyn Branco CAU Article Trial Ready Defense
 
Government procurement obligations under the ceta
Government procurement obligations under the cetaGovernment procurement obligations under the ceta
Government procurement obligations under the ceta
 
Non-competition and Non-solicitation Provisions
Non-competition and Non-solicitation ProvisionsNon-competition and Non-solicitation Provisions
Non-competition and Non-solicitation Provisions
 
KwadwoNtrakwah in Lawyer Monthly
KwadwoNtrakwah in Lawyer MonthlyKwadwoNtrakwah in Lawyer Monthly
KwadwoNtrakwah in Lawyer Monthly
 
Apportionment the netting off approach c
Apportionment the netting off approach cApportionment the netting off approach c
Apportionment the netting off approach c
 
Towards diminishing judicial intervention in statutory adjudication a pragmatic
Towards diminishing judicial intervention in statutory adjudication a pragmaticTowards diminishing judicial intervention in statutory adjudication a pragmatic
Towards diminishing judicial intervention in statutory adjudication a pragmatic
 
Mitigating Litigation Risk at the Deal Table M&A Part II
Mitigating Litigation Risk at the Deal Table M&A Part II Mitigating Litigation Risk at the Deal Table M&A Part II
Mitigating Litigation Risk at the Deal Table M&A Part II
 
Diamond Fruit growers v. Krack Corp case brief
Diamond Fruit growers v. Krack Corp case briefDiamond Fruit growers v. Krack Corp case brief
Diamond Fruit growers v. Krack Corp case brief
 
Basic Contract Law for PMs webinar Part 3: What to do when things go wrong or...
Basic Contract Law for PMs webinar Part 3: What to do when things go wrong or...Basic Contract Law for PMs webinar Part 3: What to do when things go wrong or...
Basic Contract Law for PMs webinar Part 3: What to do when things go wrong or...
 
Default Judgments Presentation
Default Judgments PresentationDefault Judgments Presentation
Default Judgments Presentation
 

BC Class Actions Trends

  • 1. McCarthy Tétrault Advance™ Building Capabilities for Growth HOT TOPICS IN CLASS ACTIONS Defending Class Actions in Canada, 3rd Edition February 9, 2012 McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 2. 2 SESSION 1 Class Actions –The Big Picture British Columbia In Flux Andrew Wilkinson, Q.C. McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 3. 15 Years of Class Actions in BC 3 ¬ BC was early in Canada (1996) ¬ Class Proceedings Act provides for rep plaintiff to apply to “certify” entire class ¬ Sometimes defendants like to be certified to ensure capture of all claims ¬ QC process (“authorization”) very different, with no appeal for defendants McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 4. Certification Criteria 4 ¬ Cause of Action (including novel claims) ¬ Identifiable class ¬ Common issues ¬ Preferable procedure ¬ Rep plaintiff adequately represents class ¬ Workable litigation plan US criteria are more restrictive than Canadian McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 5. Role of BC in Canadian Class Actions 5 ¬ “National” classes still controversial in Canada ¬ BC was a local market until recently - “opt out” made ON and QC more attractive to plaintiffs ¬ BC now seen as more plaintiff friendly ¬ ? lower thresholds for certification ¬ Organized plaintiff bar means co-ordinated actions across Canada ¬ US actions often lead by example McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 6. Proposed Amendments to 6 B.C. Class Proceedings Act ¬ Only BC, NB and NF are “opt in” ¬ SK and AB changed to “opt out” ¬ CBA proposes that BC change to “opt out” ¬ With no costs against plaintiffs, would make BC attractive to national class plaintiffs McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 7. 7 SESSION 2 Winning the war before it begins: Pre-certification strategies Miranda Lam McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 8. 8 McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 9. You’ve been sued … now what? 9 ¬ Legal considerations: ¬ Choice of defence counsel ¬ Defeating the claim on a preliminary basis ¬ Jurisdiction ¬ Other dispute resolution mechanisms ¬ Nature of the claim ¬ Opposing certification ¬ Defence on the merits ¬ Settlement McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 10. Preliminary Steps: Challenge Jurisdiction 10 ¬ In British Columbia, only residents are automatically included in the class unless they opt out ¬ Issues: ¬ Conflict of laws ¬ Court Jurisdiction and Transfer of Proceedings Act ¬ “real and substantial connection” codified ¬ Constitutional: can provincial legislation have extra-provincial effect? ¬ Practical and strategic implications McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 11. Preliminary Steps: Challenge the 11 Dispute Resolution Mechanism ¬ Mandatory Arbitration Where the subject matter of the proposed class action is an agreement or relates to one, and the agreement contains an arbitration clause requiring that any disputes under it be resolved by arbitration, a defendant may be entitled to apply to have any court proceedings stayed. N.B. Breaches of consumer protection legislation are not subject to arbitration. McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 12. Preliminary Steps: Challenge the 12 Nature of the Claim ¬ Cause of action ¬ Motion for particulars ¬ Security for costs ¬ Summary judgment and summary trial McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 13. Oppose Certification 13 ¬ OPPOSE: ¬ CONSENT: ¬ Failure to meet criteria ¬ Strong case on the merits ¬ Incomplete pleadings ¬ Conditional consent as ¬ Substantive defence on precursor to settlement the merits ¬ Significant individual ¬ Strategic positioning claims that would be costly to defend separately ¬ Leverage ¬ Appetite and resources to litigate McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 14. Avoiding Class Actions 14 ¬ Robust Risk Management ¬ Review processes and policies associated with handling customer complaints and identification of issues ¬ Review internal policies to ensure currency and responsiveness (HR, safety, environmental, confidentiality) ¬ Consistent communication – internal and externally ¬ Agreements ¬ Mandatory arbitration clauses? McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 15. 15 SESSION 3 Trends in B.C. Class Actions: Our World Is Changing Jill Yates McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 16. Types of Claims are Changing 16 ¬ BPCPA – BC’s consumer protection legislation ¬ Various benefits for plaintiffs, including: ¬ aggressive remedies in some cases ¬ insulation from arbitration in some cases ¬ Waiver of Tort ¬ either cause of action or remedy ¬ various benefits for plaintiffs ¬ Plaintiffs looking for opportunities to plead both of these McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 17. Certification Standards are Changing 17 ¬ Getting tougher to get certified in US ¬ Easier to get certified in Ontario ¬ Easier to get certified in B.C. ¬ Many courts are not strict about the requirements of the CPA ¬ e.g. Wakelam v. Johnson & Johnson et al. ¬ e.g. Steele v. Toyota Canada Inc. ¬ Courts are taking a “certify now, worry later” approach McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 18. Scope is Changing 18 ¬ National/Cross-border classes are becoming more common, including in B.C. ¬ The majority of our class actions are part of/ extensions of/ copies of claims in other jurisdictions ¬ It has been proposed that B.C.’s legislation be amended to allow for national classes ¬ Working toward a Judicial Cooperation Protocol in Canada McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 19. How We Defend is Changing 19 ¬ Courts have stated that it may often be appropriate for defendants to file a defence before certification – and some judges are requiring it ¬ Some courts are allowing pre-certification motions (e.g. pleadings, summary trials) ¬ Certification is no longer the end of the litigation process in a class action – cases are increasingly continuing beyond certification and some are going to trial McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 20. 20 SESSION 4 Class Action Quirks: Limitations Periods in “Trust” Claims Aggregate Damages AND Contribution after Settlement Warren Milman McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 21. Limitation Periods 21 ¬ Most Provinces: 2 years, subject to “discoverability” ¬ BC – Special case for claims seeking disgorgement of “trust funds” (e.g., waiver of tort) ¬ Law reform: relief is in sight? McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 22. Aggregate Damages 22 ¬ Traditional rule – can’t use CPA to create new substantive liability ¬ New rule: CPA allows class-wide damages to be aggregated so that class members need not show loss or injury ¬ Punishment vs. compensation ¬ Cy-prés awards McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 23. Contribution 23 - is settlement really the end? ¬ Rights of contribution for joint and several liability ¬ Bar orders and covenants not to sue ¬ Conspiracy claims? McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233
  • 24. VANCOUVER MONTRÉAL Suite 1300, 777 Dunsmuir Street Suite 2500 P.O. Box 10424, Pacific Centre 1000 De La Gauchetière Street West Vancouver BC V7Y 1K2 Montréal QC H3B 0A2 Tel: 604-643-7100 Tel: 514-397-4100 Fax: 604-643-7900 Fax: 514-875-6246 Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711 Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711 CALGARY QUÉBEC Suite 3300, 421 7th Avenue SW Le Complexe St-Amable Calgary AB T2P 4K9 1150, rue de Claire-Fontaine, 7e étage Tel: 403-260-3500 Québec QC G1R 5G4 Fax: 403-260-3501 Tel: 418-521-3000 Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711 Fax: 418-521-3099 Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711 TORONTO Box 48, Suite 5300 UNITED KINGDOM & EUROPE Toronto Dominion Bank Tower 125 Old Broad Street, 26th Floor Toronto ON M5K 1E6 London EC2N 1AR Tel: 416-362-1812 UNITED KINGDOM Fax: 416-868-0673 Tel: +44 (0)20 7786 5700 Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711 Fax: +44 (0)20 7786 5702 McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / February 9, 2012 / Doc ID #11150233