SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  29
The Value of a Self-assessment Rubric
     in Online Discussion Forums
                 Dr. Rafi Davidson
     Center of Educational Technology Initiatives
                 Dr. Annette Kahan
   Communication & Information Educational Center
   Kaye College of Education, Beer-Sheva, Israel

        June 2007, Beer-Sheva, Tel-Aviv 25-28
   “Knowledge is located neither in the mind nor in any
    representation of the mind. All of our understandings
    are situated in complex webs of experience, action,
    and interaction. Knowledge is a dynamic, evolving
    phenomenon, a fabric of relations in which one
    individual is fundamentally entwined with all others
    in a community” (Martin Ryder , 1999).

   http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/reflect/enactivism.html
The Concept of Collaborative
            Knowledge Building
   Knowledge building may be defined as “The
    production and continual improvement of ideas of
    value to a community, through means that increase
    the likelihood that what the community accomplishes
    will be greater than the sum of individual
    contributions and part of broader cultural efforts”
    (Scardamalia & Bereiter, 2003).

   The use of networked computers provides
    alternatives to traditional teaching and learning as we
    move from a single-classroom concept to the concept
    of a knowledge-building community of learners.
The importance of online forums
in collaborative knowledge building


     Online discussion forums are one of the most
      common and accepted tools for collaborative
      learning in virtual courses.

     The forums are a shared online environment
      that enables collaborative knowledge building
      and supportive social communities (Harasim 1989).
  
But
 Mason and others (1993) point out that dialogue in
   online forums is disappointing in many instances,
   since the quality of the learning and the knowledge
   building is poor.
So
 One of the greatest challenges is promoting
   discourse and developing a high level of discussion
   and critical thinking in the virtual environment, that
   will produce meaningful learning, as comprehensive
   as possible.
!1


     The Importance of Self-assessment in
             Teacher Education

     Use of the self-assessment rubric encourages
      pre-service and in-service teachers to develop
      the abilities of critical thinking, reflection and
      evaluation, abilities that are very important in
      the teaching profession.

     Self-assessment is very effective for learners
      seeking to improve their knowledge and learning
      strategies (Shaklee et al. 1997), particularly in a
      collaborative learning setting.
!2



             ?What is our innovation



        Models for online discussion self-
         assessment usually provide criteria for
         the learners but do not require their
         active decision-making and reflection on
         the quality of the posts.
!3



     Therefore we developed a rubric for
              self-assessment

        To attempt to create a significant online learning
         community.
        To encourage collaborative knowledge building.
        To assist learners in recognizing their commitment.
        To encourage re-organization of the discussion in a
         relevant manner.
        To transfer the responsibility of evaluation to the learner.
        To develop the abilities of reflection and evaluation.
        To ease the lecturer’s workload.
The rubric was used in the following courses in a
college of education:

1. ICT in Teaching and Learning

2. Information Literacy in Education

3. Teaching Heterogeneous Classrooms
Stages in the Development of
           the Self-assessment Rubric
   Year of Final Grade % Evaluation and Evaluator


2000Un         5% - 10% (Participation (amount of posts
     til                Evaluation by lecturer only
   2001             15%   A few qualitative and quantitative criteria based on
                          -participation and contribution to learning
                          Evaluation by lecturer only
   2002             20% Self-assessment rubric prepared by lecturer
                        Evaluation by lecturer only
   2003             30% Self-assessment rubric improved - based on
                         students‘ comments
                        Self- evaluation by students with monitoring by
                        lecturer( (students determined their own grade
2004-20          30-60% Self-assessment rubric
     06                 Self- evaluation by students with monitoring by
                        (lecturer (students determined their own grade
!4

               Steps in the use of the
                       rubric
        The rubric is presented to the students at the
         beginning of the online courses.
        During the courses, the students collect their
         own postings and evaluate their contributions
         to the knowledge building of their fellow
         students.
        The final grades in the courses are a
         combination of the student's and the
         lecturer’s evaluation.
!5


                      Rubric Categories

1.        Personal opinion or idea - Offering a reasoned
          opinion based on reliable sources.
2.        Responding to others - Relevant and supported
          response which adds to what others have said
3.        Referral to reliable sources of information
4.        Summarizing a topic or issue discussed on the
          forum – based on the discussion and contribution
          of others.
5.        Helping peers to solve all kinds of problems
6.         Asking challenging questions
!6




           Rubric Categories (continued)

     1.   Taking personal initiatives in the forum.
          These may include:
           Opening a new topic for discussion in a new
            forum, writing a document on the topic
            including sources which are presented to the
            participants

             Opening a forum and directing the discussion
              with peers

             Summarizing the discussion
Student's perspective on the value of
     the self-assessment rubric
    (Based on content analysis of students’
     responses to the questions on the value
         of the self assessment rubric)
!7


             Student's perspective on the
             value of the self-assessment

     The students referred to the following contributions:

        Motivation
        Transparency and Fairness of Assessment
        Collaborative Knowledge Building
        Self Directed Learning
        Life Skills
        Professional Development as Teachers
Motivation

   “Gives the student a huge motivation to learn”

   “Gives the student a clearer picture of the amount of
    his participation and his contribution to learning"

   “The rubric is a way to give students a push to learn
    and to evaluate the process they are going through.“
Transparency and Fairness of
             Assessment
   “I realized that I have been very active in the
    various forums.”

   “… know where I stand, and if I have done what
    was expected of me.”

   "The student understands exactly why (and how)
    he got this grade.”

   “I very much like the idea of ranking within each
    criteria “
Collaborative Knowledge
Building

   “In this way it is possible to find out the
    extent of our participation in the various
    forums and our contribution to other
    students’ learning”
Self Directed Learning

   “Working with the rubric is a process that
    causes us to look at ourselves critically.”

   “Self-assessment changes the status of the
    student and makes him an active participant,
    who is held responsible for his contribution.”

   “… It is obvious that the rubric is a necessary
    tool for learning, especially in self-learning.”
Life Skills


   “Once they acquire the skill of self-
    assessment in learning, they can apply it
    to life in general.”
!8


         Professional Development as
                   Teachers

        “The rubric is an excellent opportunity to learn
         more about our pupil - his real ability to
         assess himself, his self-confidence…”

        “I hope that most of us will try, and also
         succeed in implementing (self-assessment) in
         our future classrooms as teachers "
Difficulties Expressed by
        Students using the Rubric
   It takes a long time and a lot of effort to use
    the self-assessment rubric.

    Having the rubric in mind while participating
    in the forums makes the discussion “forced”
    – it doesn’t flow freely.

   The rubric restricts creativity and free
    choice.
!9



                         Conclusions

        Students believe that the self-assessment rubric
         contributes to their knowledge building and their
         training to be teachers, increases social support,
         and allows greater visibility as to how they are
         evaluated in the courses.

        Preliminary research of content analysis of forum
         posts shows that the tool raised the level of
         discussion and increased critical thinking and
         collaborative knowledge building.
?Where do we go from here

   Adapting the rubric to the needs of other
    online courses and student populations.

   Developing online tools to facilitate the self-
    assessment process.
It is important to continue
    research in the following areas:
   Research on the effect of the rubric on
    learning and motivation of students.

   Research on the effect of the rubric on
    change in the role of the instructor.

   Research on the development of concepts
    during discussion in forums.
Maximum     Maximum
                                  Number of contributions                 number of   number of
                  Each contribution is worth a certain number             points for  points for
  Category               of points, based on its quality                  each post each category

Personal .1       I                 II                  III
opinion/idea      Contributing      Contributing a      Contributing a
                  a relevant        relevant            relevant
(in the
                  idea/opinion      reasoned            reasoned
opening
                                    idea/opinion        idea/opinion      points 3    points 12
message of the                      or one based on     and basing it
forum, not in                       a reliable source   on reliable
response to                                             sources
(others                1 point           2 points           3 points
                  IV                V                   VI
                  Relevant          Relevant and        Same as V but
                  response-         supported           adding to
Responding .2
                  without           response which      responses of
to participants   explanation       adds to what        others and also
                  and               others have said    including
                  justification     (like an example    referral to
                                    or information      additional         points 3   points 12
                                    from experience)    source/s

                       1 point           2 points             3 points
Maximum     Maximum
                               Number of contributions               number of   number of
                   Each contribution is worth a certain number       points for  points for
  Category                of points, based on its quality            each post each category

3. Adding a             VII              VIII
post that refers   Referral to     Referral to
to reliable        relevant        relevant online
sources of         online source   source with
information        without         comments                            points 2   points 8
                   description
                   1 point            2 points
4.                       IX                X               XI
Summarizing a      Summarizing     Summarizing a     Summarizing
topic discussed    a topic         topic discussed   a topic
in the forum –     discussed in    in the forum      discussed in
based on posts     the forum       and               the forum and
                                   including         including         points 8     points 16
                                   additional        additional
                                   information       information
                                   covered in the    from outside
                                   course            sources
                   3 points             5 points        8 points
Maximum     Maximum
                             Number of contributions                number of   number of
                Each contribution is worth a certain number         points for  points for
  Category             of points, based on its quality              each post each category

Asking .5            XII             XIII                XIV
challenging     Asking a       Asking a            Asking a
questions       question       question which      question that
                connected to   received at least   received at
                the course     one answer          least two
                and its        from peers          responses
                                                                    points 3     points 9
                purposes                           from peers
                1 Point        2 Points            3 Points
Initiating a .6      XV              XVI                XVII
new discussion Raising a       Raising a topic     Raising a
forum           topic for      for discussion      topic for
                discussion     and moderating      discussion,
                               the discussion      moderating
                                                                    points 10   points 30
                                                   the discussion
                                                   and
                                                   summarizing
                                                   the discussion
                4 Points       6 Points            10 Points
Maximum     Maximum
                         Number of contributions           number of   number of
             Each contribution is worth a certain number   points for  points for
Category            of points, based on its quality        each post each category

Helping .7      XVIII            XIX
             Providing a    Providing a
peers to
             solution or    solution or
solve        idea to help   idea to help
problems –   resolve a      resolve a                       points 2    points 6
technical    simple         complex
and          problem        problem
course-
               1 Point         2 Points
related

Contenu connexe

Tendances

hybrid_learning_program_evaluation
hybrid_learning_program_evaluationhybrid_learning_program_evaluation
hybrid_learning_program_evaluation
Michael Wilder
 
Community of Inquiry
Community of InquiryCommunity of Inquiry
Community of Inquiry
Phil Ice
 
Electronic-portfolio development in three professional programs: Learning per...
Electronic-portfolio development in three professional programs: Learning per...Electronic-portfolio development in three professional programs: Learning per...
Electronic-portfolio development in three professional programs: Learning per...
Tim Hopper
 
Instructors As Transformational Leaders In The Classroom
Instructors As Transformational Leaders In The Classroom  Instructors As Transformational Leaders In The Classroom
Instructors As Transformational Leaders In The Classroom
dancinghorse18
 
Megan Hoff week 3 Analysis - PowerPoint Presentation
Megan Hoff week 3 Analysis - PowerPoint PresentationMegan Hoff week 3 Analysis - PowerPoint Presentation
Megan Hoff week 3 Analysis - PowerPoint Presentation
Megan Moscato Hoff
 
Collaborative Leadership Frameworks-Erin Bennett
Collaborative Leadership Frameworks-Erin BennettCollaborative Leadership Frameworks-Erin Bennett
Collaborative Leadership Frameworks-Erin Bennett
Erin Bennett
 
The role of social presence in computer supported collaborative learning and ...
The role of social presence in computer supported collaborative learning and ...The role of social presence in computer supported collaborative learning and ...
The role of social presence in computer supported collaborative learning and ...
johnroseadams1
 
Learnin design roehampton
Learnin design roehamptonLearnin design roehampton
Learnin design roehampton
SUNY Oneonta
 

Tendances (18)

SLN Online Teaching Self-assessment
SLN Online Teaching Self-assessmentSLN Online Teaching Self-assessment
SLN Online Teaching Self-assessment
 
National Competency Based Teachers Standard
National Competency Based Teachers StandardNational Competency Based Teachers Standard
National Competency Based Teachers Standard
 
Reflective blogs latest (1)
Reflective blogs latest (1)Reflective blogs latest (1)
Reflective blogs latest (1)
 
hybrid_learning_program_evaluation
hybrid_learning_program_evaluationhybrid_learning_program_evaluation
hybrid_learning_program_evaluation
 
Community of Inquiry
Community of InquiryCommunity of Inquiry
Community of Inquiry
 
Social and Cognitive Presence in Virtual Learning Environments
Social and Cognitive Presence in Virtual Learning Environments Social and Cognitive Presence in Virtual Learning Environments
Social and Cognitive Presence in Virtual Learning Environments
 
PROTOCOLO FANTASMA
PROTOCOLO FANTASMAPROTOCOLO FANTASMA
PROTOCOLO FANTASMA
 
Exploring the community of inquiry framework
Exploring the community of inquiry framework Exploring the community of inquiry framework
Exploring the community of inquiry framework
 
Developing Collaboration in Online Courses: A Study of Synchronous & Asynchro...
Developing Collaboration in Online Courses: A Study of Synchronous & Asynchro...Developing Collaboration in Online Courses: A Study of Synchronous & Asynchro...
Developing Collaboration in Online Courses: A Study of Synchronous & Asynchro...
 
Team 1 mini design document
Team 1 mini design documentTeam 1 mini design document
Team 1 mini design document
 
RSWB introductory lecture 2015
RSWB  introductory lecture 2015RSWB  introductory lecture 2015
RSWB introductory lecture 2015
 
Electronic-portfolio development in three professional programs: Learning per...
Electronic-portfolio development in three professional programs: Learning per...Electronic-portfolio development in three professional programs: Learning per...
Electronic-portfolio development in three professional programs: Learning per...
 
Instructors As Transformational Leaders In The Classroom
Instructors As Transformational Leaders In The Classroom  Instructors As Transformational Leaders In The Classroom
Instructors As Transformational Leaders In The Classroom
 
Megan Hoff week 3 Analysis - PowerPoint Presentation
Megan Hoff week 3 Analysis - PowerPoint PresentationMegan Hoff week 3 Analysis - PowerPoint Presentation
Megan Hoff week 3 Analysis - PowerPoint Presentation
 
Collaborative Leadership Frameworks-Erin Bennett
Collaborative Leadership Frameworks-Erin BennettCollaborative Leadership Frameworks-Erin Bennett
Collaborative Leadership Frameworks-Erin Bennett
 
SALT 2009 - Faculty Success
SALT 2009 - Faculty SuccessSALT 2009 - Faculty Success
SALT 2009 - Faculty Success
 
The role of social presence in computer supported collaborative learning and ...
The role of social presence in computer supported collaborative learning and ...The role of social presence in computer supported collaborative learning and ...
The role of social presence in computer supported collaborative learning and ...
 
Learnin design roehampton
Learnin design roehamptonLearnin design roehampton
Learnin design roehampton
 

En vedette (7)

Project based learning the process
Project based learning the processProject based learning the process
Project based learning the process
 
Peer Evaluation Strategy for Improving Group Participation at Brightspace Ten...
Peer Evaluation Strategy for Improving Group Participation at Brightspace Ten...Peer Evaluation Strategy for Improving Group Participation at Brightspace Ten...
Peer Evaluation Strategy for Improving Group Participation at Brightspace Ten...
 
Group size, dialog and high quality participation
Group size, dialog and high quality participationGroup size, dialog and high quality participation
Group size, dialog and high quality participation
 
ppt of group dynamics
ppt of group dynamicsppt of group dynamics
ppt of group dynamics
 
Effective e youth participation
Effective e  youth participationEffective e  youth participation
Effective e youth participation
 
Group dynamics
Group dynamicsGroup dynamics
Group dynamics
 
General Methods And Techniques Of Teaching
General Methods And Techniques Of TeachingGeneral Methods And Techniques Of Teaching
General Methods And Techniques Of Teaching
 

Similaire à self-assessment rubric for evaluation of online discussion learning

Proposing a model for the incremental development of peer assessment and feed...
Proposing a model for the incremental development of peer assessment and feed...Proposing a model for the incremental development of peer assessment and feed...
Proposing a model for the incremental development of peer assessment and feed...
Laura Costelloe
 
Rounding up assessment, ending a course
Rounding up  assessment, ending a courseRounding up  assessment, ending a course
Rounding up assessment, ending a course
ferlop73
 
Learning Centered College
Learning Centered CollegeLearning Centered College
Learning Centered College
ssorden
 
Peterson hastac p3 morning session (final)
Peterson hastac p3 morning session (final)Peterson hastac p3 morning session (final)
Peterson hastac p3 morning session (final)
Nils Peterson
 
Developing tutoring craft through cross-institutional peer exchange: reflecti...
Developing tutoring craft through cross-institutional peer exchange: reflecti...Developing tutoring craft through cross-institutional peer exchange: reflecti...
Developing tutoring craft through cross-institutional peer exchange: reflecti...
RichardM_Walker
 
Symposium visual final
Symposium visual finalSymposium visual final
Symposium visual final
DianeOnorato
 
Information Literacy Assessment 2003 version
Information Literacy Assessment  2003 versionInformation Literacy Assessment  2003 version
Information Literacy Assessment 2003 version
Johan Koren
 
NTLTC 2011 - Academic co-creative inquiry
NTLTC 2011 - Academic co-creative inquiryNTLTC 2011 - Academic co-creative inquiry
NTLTC 2011 - Academic co-creative inquiry
NTLT Conference
 
Reflective Commentary
Reflective Commentary Reflective Commentary
Reflective Commentary
susan70
 

Similaire à self-assessment rubric for evaluation of online discussion learning (20)

Democratizing the Discussion Board: Establishing a Community of Learners to G...
Democratizing the Discussion Board: Establishing a Community of Learners to G...Democratizing the Discussion Board: Establishing a Community of Learners to G...
Democratizing the Discussion Board: Establishing a Community of Learners to G...
 
Proposing a model for the incremental development of peer assessment and feed...
Proposing a model for the incremental development of peer assessment and feed...Proposing a model for the incremental development of peer assessment and feed...
Proposing a model for the incremental development of peer assessment and feed...
 
Passing the baton: trusting students with the co-creation and ownership of OE...
Passing the baton: trusting students with the co-creation and ownership of OE...Passing the baton: trusting students with the co-creation and ownership of OE...
Passing the baton: trusting students with the co-creation and ownership of OE...
 
Rounding up assessment, ending a course
Rounding up  assessment, ending a courseRounding up  assessment, ending a course
Rounding up assessment, ending a course
 
Learning Centered College
Learning Centered CollegeLearning Centered College
Learning Centered College
 
Independent learning through Massive Open Online Courses
Independent learning through Massive Open Online CoursesIndependent learning through Massive Open Online Courses
Independent learning through Massive Open Online Courses
 
Ifp staff training day2
Ifp staff training day2Ifp staff training day2
Ifp staff training day2
 
Research dissemination within and beyond the curriculum
Research dissemination within and beyond the curriculumResearch dissemination within and beyond the curriculum
Research dissemination within and beyond the curriculum
 
Peterson hastac p3 morning session (final)
Peterson hastac p3 morning session (final)Peterson hastac p3 morning session (final)
Peterson hastac p3 morning session (final)
 
Developing tutoring craft through cross-institutional peer exchange: reflecti...
Developing tutoring craft through cross-institutional peer exchange: reflecti...Developing tutoring craft through cross-institutional peer exchange: reflecti...
Developing tutoring craft through cross-institutional peer exchange: reflecti...
 
Swd st lin atl
Swd st lin atlSwd st lin atl
Swd st lin atl
 
E-Portfolios and the Problem of Learning
E-Portfolios and the Problem of Learning E-Portfolios and the Problem of Learning
E-Portfolios and the Problem of Learning
 
Assessing Online Asynchronous Discussion in Online Courses: An Empirical Study
Assessing Online Asynchronous Discussion in Online Courses: An Empirical StudyAssessing Online Asynchronous Discussion in Online Courses: An Empirical Study
Assessing Online Asynchronous Discussion in Online Courses: An Empirical Study
 
Symposium visual final
Symposium visual finalSymposium visual final
Symposium visual final
 
Macknight+2000+questions[1]
Macknight+2000+questions[1]Macknight+2000+questions[1]
Macknight+2000+questions[1]
 
Information Literacy Assessment 2003 version
Information Literacy Assessment  2003 versionInformation Literacy Assessment  2003 version
Information Literacy Assessment 2003 version
 
Using self- and peer-assessment to develop Higher Education teachers' skills ...
Using self- and peer-assessment to develop Higher Education teachers' skills ...Using self- and peer-assessment to develop Higher Education teachers' skills ...
Using self- and peer-assessment to develop Higher Education teachers' skills ...
 
CSCL 2017 | Using Rotating Leadership to Visualize Students’ Epistemic Agency...
CSCL 2017 | Using Rotating Leadership to Visualize Students’ Epistemic Agency...CSCL 2017 | Using Rotating Leadership to Visualize Students’ Epistemic Agency...
CSCL 2017 | Using Rotating Leadership to Visualize Students’ Epistemic Agency...
 
NTLTC 2011 - Academic co-creative inquiry
NTLTC 2011 - Academic co-creative inquiryNTLTC 2011 - Academic co-creative inquiry
NTLTC 2011 - Academic co-creative inquiry
 
Reflective Commentary
Reflective Commentary Reflective Commentary
Reflective Commentary
 

Plus de מופ"ת - המכון למחקר ופיתוח של רשת המכללות ךלחינוך

Plus de מופ"ת - המכון למחקר ופיתוח של רשת המכללות ךלחינוך (6)

עבודה שיתופית ולמידה_רב-תחומית_במאה_ה-21_בית-ברל_מצויינים2
עבודה שיתופית ולמידה_רב-תחומית_במאה_ה-21_בית-ברל_מצויינים2עבודה שיתופית ולמידה_רב-תחומית_במאה_ה-21_בית-ברל_מצויינים2
עבודה שיתופית ולמידה_רב-תחומית_במאה_ה-21_בית-ברל_מצויינים2
 
rafid101 google+
rafid101 google+rafid101 google+
rafid101 google+
 
פדגוגיות חדשניות בעידן האינטרנט ותפקיד המורה
פדגוגיות חדשניות בעידן האינטרנט ותפקיד המורהפדגוגיות חדשניות בעידן האינטרנט ותפקיד המורה
פדגוגיות חדשניות בעידן האינטרנט ותפקיד המורה
 
אגף מצוינות 6-10-2011
אגף מצוינות 6-10-2011אגף מצוינות 6-10-2011
אגף מצוינות 6-10-2011
 
הרצאה3 ניהול בית_ספר_בעידן_הדיגיטלי_רפי-דודזון_3-11-10
הרצאה3 ניהול בית_ספר_בעידן_הדיגיטלי_רפי-דודזון_3-11-10הרצאה3 ניהול בית_ספר_בעידן_הדיגיטלי_רפי-דודזון_3-11-10
הרצאה3 ניהול בית_ספר_בעידן_הדיגיטלי_רפי-דודזון_3-11-10
 
מאפייני מורה בכיתה מקוונת 2010
מאפייני מורה בכיתה מקוונת 2010מאפייני מורה בכיתה מקוונת 2010
מאפייני מורה בכיתה מקוונת 2010
 

Dernier

The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
negromaestrong
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
ciinovamais
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
QucHHunhnh
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
kauryashika82
 
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
ZurliaSoop
 

Dernier (20)

Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdfFood safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
 
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
 
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
 
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
 
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POSHow to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
 
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
 
SKILL OF INTRODUCING THE LESSON MICRO SKILLS.pptx
SKILL OF INTRODUCING THE LESSON MICRO SKILLS.pptxSKILL OF INTRODUCING THE LESSON MICRO SKILLS.pptx
SKILL OF INTRODUCING THE LESSON MICRO SKILLS.pptx
 
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin ClassesMixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
 
Third Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptx
Third Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptxThird Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptx
Third Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptx
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
 
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan FellowsOn National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
 

self-assessment rubric for evaluation of online discussion learning

  • 1. The Value of a Self-assessment Rubric in Online Discussion Forums Dr. Rafi Davidson Center of Educational Technology Initiatives Dr. Annette Kahan Communication & Information Educational Center Kaye College of Education, Beer-Sheva, Israel June 2007, Beer-Sheva, Tel-Aviv 25-28
  • 2. “Knowledge is located neither in the mind nor in any representation of the mind. All of our understandings are situated in complex webs of experience, action, and interaction. Knowledge is a dynamic, evolving phenomenon, a fabric of relations in which one individual is fundamentally entwined with all others in a community” (Martin Ryder , 1999).  http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/reflect/enactivism.html
  • 3. The Concept of Collaborative Knowledge Building  Knowledge building may be defined as “The production and continual improvement of ideas of value to a community, through means that increase the likelihood that what the community accomplishes will be greater than the sum of individual contributions and part of broader cultural efforts” (Scardamalia & Bereiter, 2003).  The use of networked computers provides alternatives to traditional teaching and learning as we move from a single-classroom concept to the concept of a knowledge-building community of learners.
  • 4. The importance of online forums in collaborative knowledge building  Online discussion forums are one of the most common and accepted tools for collaborative learning in virtual courses.  The forums are a shared online environment that enables collaborative knowledge building and supportive social communities (Harasim 1989). 
  • 5. But  Mason and others (1993) point out that dialogue in online forums is disappointing in many instances, since the quality of the learning and the knowledge building is poor. So  One of the greatest challenges is promoting discourse and developing a high level of discussion and critical thinking in the virtual environment, that will produce meaningful learning, as comprehensive as possible.
  • 6. !1 The Importance of Self-assessment in Teacher Education  Use of the self-assessment rubric encourages pre-service and in-service teachers to develop the abilities of critical thinking, reflection and evaluation, abilities that are very important in the teaching profession.  Self-assessment is very effective for learners seeking to improve their knowledge and learning strategies (Shaklee et al. 1997), particularly in a collaborative learning setting.
  • 7. !2 ?What is our innovation  Models for online discussion self- assessment usually provide criteria for the learners but do not require their active decision-making and reflection on the quality of the posts.
  • 8. !3 Therefore we developed a rubric for self-assessment  To attempt to create a significant online learning community.  To encourage collaborative knowledge building.  To assist learners in recognizing their commitment.  To encourage re-organization of the discussion in a relevant manner.  To transfer the responsibility of evaluation to the learner.  To develop the abilities of reflection and evaluation.  To ease the lecturer’s workload.
  • 9. The rubric was used in the following courses in a college of education: 1. ICT in Teaching and Learning 2. Information Literacy in Education 3. Teaching Heterogeneous Classrooms
  • 10. Stages in the Development of the Self-assessment Rubric Year of Final Grade % Evaluation and Evaluator 2000Un 5% - 10% (Participation (amount of posts til Evaluation by lecturer only 2001 15% A few qualitative and quantitative criteria based on -participation and contribution to learning Evaluation by lecturer only 2002 20% Self-assessment rubric prepared by lecturer Evaluation by lecturer only 2003 30% Self-assessment rubric improved - based on students‘ comments Self- evaluation by students with monitoring by lecturer( (students determined their own grade 2004-20 30-60% Self-assessment rubric 06 Self- evaluation by students with monitoring by (lecturer (students determined their own grade
  • 11. !4 Steps in the use of the rubric  The rubric is presented to the students at the beginning of the online courses.  During the courses, the students collect their own postings and evaluate their contributions to the knowledge building of their fellow students.  The final grades in the courses are a combination of the student's and the lecturer’s evaluation.
  • 12. !5 Rubric Categories 1. Personal opinion or idea - Offering a reasoned opinion based on reliable sources. 2. Responding to others - Relevant and supported response which adds to what others have said 3. Referral to reliable sources of information 4. Summarizing a topic or issue discussed on the forum – based on the discussion and contribution of others. 5. Helping peers to solve all kinds of problems 6. Asking challenging questions
  • 13. !6 Rubric Categories (continued) 1. Taking personal initiatives in the forum. These may include:  Opening a new topic for discussion in a new forum, writing a document on the topic including sources which are presented to the participants  Opening a forum and directing the discussion with peers  Summarizing the discussion
  • 14. Student's perspective on the value of the self-assessment rubric (Based on content analysis of students’ responses to the questions on the value of the self assessment rubric)
  • 15. !7 Student's perspective on the value of the self-assessment The students referred to the following contributions:  Motivation  Transparency and Fairness of Assessment  Collaborative Knowledge Building  Self Directed Learning  Life Skills  Professional Development as Teachers
  • 16. Motivation  “Gives the student a huge motivation to learn”  “Gives the student a clearer picture of the amount of his participation and his contribution to learning"  “The rubric is a way to give students a push to learn and to evaluate the process they are going through.“
  • 17. Transparency and Fairness of Assessment  “I realized that I have been very active in the various forums.”  “… know where I stand, and if I have done what was expected of me.”  "The student understands exactly why (and how) he got this grade.”  “I very much like the idea of ranking within each criteria “
  • 18. Collaborative Knowledge Building  “In this way it is possible to find out the extent of our participation in the various forums and our contribution to other students’ learning”
  • 19. Self Directed Learning  “Working with the rubric is a process that causes us to look at ourselves critically.”  “Self-assessment changes the status of the student and makes him an active participant, who is held responsible for his contribution.”  “… It is obvious that the rubric is a necessary tool for learning, especially in self-learning.”
  • 20. Life Skills  “Once they acquire the skill of self- assessment in learning, they can apply it to life in general.”
  • 21. !8 Professional Development as Teachers  “The rubric is an excellent opportunity to learn more about our pupil - his real ability to assess himself, his self-confidence…”  “I hope that most of us will try, and also succeed in implementing (self-assessment) in our future classrooms as teachers "
  • 22. Difficulties Expressed by Students using the Rubric  It takes a long time and a lot of effort to use the self-assessment rubric.  Having the rubric in mind while participating in the forums makes the discussion “forced” – it doesn’t flow freely.  The rubric restricts creativity and free choice.
  • 23. !9 Conclusions  Students believe that the self-assessment rubric contributes to their knowledge building and their training to be teachers, increases social support, and allows greater visibility as to how they are evaluated in the courses.  Preliminary research of content analysis of forum posts shows that the tool raised the level of discussion and increased critical thinking and collaborative knowledge building.
  • 24. ?Where do we go from here  Adapting the rubric to the needs of other online courses and student populations.  Developing online tools to facilitate the self- assessment process.
  • 25. It is important to continue research in the following areas:  Research on the effect of the rubric on learning and motivation of students.  Research on the effect of the rubric on change in the role of the instructor.  Research on the development of concepts during discussion in forums.
  • 26. Maximum Maximum Number of contributions number of number of Each contribution is worth a certain number points for points for Category of points, based on its quality each post each category Personal .1 I II III opinion/idea Contributing Contributing a Contributing a a relevant relevant relevant (in the idea/opinion reasoned reasoned opening idea/opinion idea/opinion points 3 points 12 message of the or one based on and basing it forum, not in a reliable source on reliable response to sources (others 1 point 2 points 3 points IV V VI Relevant Relevant and Same as V but response- supported adding to Responding .2 without response which responses of to participants explanation adds to what others and also and others have said including justification (like an example referral to or information additional points 3 points 12 from experience) source/s 1 point 2 points 3 points
  • 27. Maximum Maximum Number of contributions number of number of Each contribution is worth a certain number points for points for Category of points, based on its quality each post each category 3. Adding a VII VIII post that refers Referral to Referral to to reliable relevant relevant online sources of online source source with information without comments points 2 points 8 description 1 point 2 points 4. IX X XI Summarizing a Summarizing Summarizing a Summarizing topic discussed a topic topic discussed a topic in the forum – discussed in in the forum discussed in based on posts the forum and the forum and including including points 8 points 16 additional additional information information covered in the from outside course sources 3 points 5 points 8 points
  • 28. Maximum Maximum Number of contributions number of number of Each contribution is worth a certain number points for points for Category of points, based on its quality each post each category Asking .5 XII XIII XIV challenging Asking a Asking a Asking a questions question question which question that connected to received at least received at the course one answer least two and its from peers responses points 3 points 9 purposes from peers 1 Point 2 Points 3 Points Initiating a .6 XV XVI XVII new discussion Raising a Raising a topic Raising a forum topic for for discussion topic for discussion and moderating discussion, the discussion moderating points 10 points 30 the discussion and summarizing the discussion 4 Points 6 Points 10 Points
  • 29. Maximum Maximum Number of contributions number of number of Each contribution is worth a certain number points for points for Category of points, based on its quality each post each category Helping .7 XVIII XIX Providing a Providing a peers to solution or solution or solve idea to help idea to help problems – resolve a resolve a points 2 points 6 technical simple complex and problem problem course- 1 Point 2 Points related

Notes de l'éditeur

  1. Comments: 1. Scardamalia and Bereiter were the first ones to coin the phrase knowledge building in 1993???.
  2. We are lecturers in Kaye College of Education, and we teach various online courses including "ICT in Teaching and Learning“ & “Information Literacy in Education” , and “Teaching in Heterogeneous Classrooms”. Forums are a major component of these courses. We were disappointed with the level of participation, and the contribution to knowledge building Existing the forums in our online courses.
  3. 2005 – beginning of research on the quality of the contribution of the self-assessment rubric to the enhancement of collaborative knowledge building.. It is important to note that at the beginning of every course, students are able to express opinion about the rubric, and to suggest modifications.