Theoretical examination of the research on identity formation has shown that power structures exist in society which are perpetuated/ emulated in everyday conversations. These power structures influence and control the ways in which people are able to negotiate new identities (Norton, 2000; Lave & Wenger, 1991). As Norton (2000) has outlined, the power in most interactions lies with the more proficient speakers of the language who have a more highly developed understanding of the social rules, and as such can manipulate the conversation to their advantage. Lave and Wenger (1991) indicate that movement towards full participation as a member of a group involves increasing effort and commitment and identifying oneself as a master practitioner. The onus in this theory is upon the individual as the instigator of change and progress to becoming a group member and also upon the self-concept of their identity as a full member of the community.