Contenu connexe Similaire à Geoffrey Moore: Using Innovation to Thrive and Strive (20) Plus de SAS Institute India Pvt. Ltd (20) Geoffrey Moore: Using Innovation to Thrive and Strive2. Agenda
• Focusing Innovation
• Funding Innovation
2 Dealing with Darwin © 2006, TCG Advisors LLC
August 11, 2010
4. Three Returns on Innovation
• Differentiation
• Your offers are distinctly preferable to the competition, and
customers seek them out and pay a premium for them
• Neutralization
• Your offers are competitive with others in your category and
category,
you win sales based on execution and price
• Optimization
• Your offers cost less to produce than they used to, giving you
the ti
th option of lowering price or i
fl i i increasing margins
i i
4 Dealing with Darwin © 2006, TCG Advisors LLC
August 11, 2010
5. Innovating for Differentiation
Focus on Competitive Separation
Amplify a specific
vector of innovation
*
* Gain bargaining power
Competitor 1
by getting separation
*
YOU from your
*
Competitor 2
competitive set
*
Competitor 3
Failure to separate
Competitive Set
C ii S means low to no relief
on profit margins
5 Dealing with Darwin © 2006, TCG Advisors LLC
August 11, 2010
6. Core vs. Context
• Core:
• Processes that enable and amplify your chosen vector of
competitive separation.
• Context:
• All other processes.
• C
Context is determined by what you choose to make core.
• Differentiation
• It is not sufficient just to be different—everyone is
• Your differentiation has to be “unmatchable”
unmatchable
• And the customer has to really want it
6 Dealing with Darwin © 2006, TCG Advisors LLC
August 11, 2010
7. Declaring Your Core
Where Can You Be “Unmatchable”?
e e Ca ou e U atc ab e
Product
Disruptive
p Solution Product Platform
Leadership Technology Specialization Engineering Ecosystem
Zone
Genentech Accenture BMW Google
Customer Power Brand
Product Marketing Quality of
Intimacy Line
Design
D i Programs
P Experience
E i
Extension
Zone
Mattel Apple Amazon Cirque du Soleil
Operational Business
Value System Process
Excellence Engineering
E i i Integration
I t ti Optimization
O ti i ti
Model
Innovation
Zone
WalMart SAP Toyota Salesforce.com
7 Dealing with Darwin © 2009, TCG Advisors LLC
August 11, 2010
8. How NOT to Manage Innovation
Remember Your Vector Math Class!
= 0
Bubble-up I
B bbl Innovation
ti
When organizations innovate “bottoms up,”
competitive separation i small,
titi ti is ll
and differentiation is easily matched:
Lots of activity, not much to show for it.
8 Dealing with Darwin © 2009, TCG Advisors LLC
August 11, 2010
9. Focusing Innovation for Separation
• You will innovate in many different areas
• This is necessary to keep up with market evolution
• It is not about differentiation
• You will not achieve competitive separation in many areas
• You must focus intensely to achieve “unmatchability”
unmatchability
• Even then there is no guarantee
• You must be highly directive in declaring your core
• Investment must be very assymetrical
• Gi i everyone th i f i share i a l i strategy
Giving their fair h is losing t t
9 Dealing with Darwin © 2006, TCG Advisors LLC
August 11, 2010
10. Innovating for Neutralization
Focus on Meeting the Market’s New Norm
Market s
Regain market viability
*
Competitor 1 by getting back into the
competitive set
*
Competitor 2
* Rejoining is i i
R j i i i mission-
*
Competitor 3
critical as failure to do
so means exclusion
from future purchase
*
YOU decisions
Competitive Set
C ii S
10 Dealing with Darwin © 2006, TCG Advisors LLC
August 11, 2010
11. Differentiation vs. Neutralization
• Differentiation creates competitive separation
• This is how you create superior profit margins
• It requires major investments to be “unmatchable”
• Neutralization overcomes competitive disadvantage
• This is how you stay in the game
• It requires modest investments to be “good enough”
• Anything spent in between is waste!
• Customers appreciate the extras but will not pay you for them
• B i b t in class i a sucker’s b t
Being best i l is k ’ bet
11 Dealing with Darwin © 2006, TCG Advisors LLC
August 11, 2010
12. Innovating for Optimization
Focus on Productivity
YOU Competition drives
commoditization
*
Competitor 1
Productivity gains are
*
Competitor 2
critical to keep pace
*
*
Competitor 3
Optimizing is mission-
critical because failure
Competitive Set
means no profits to
Price reinvest
Deflation
12 Dealing with Darwin © 2006, TCG Advisors LLC
August 11, 2010
13. Where to Optimize
• Do not optimize when you are trying to be unmatchable
• This is your core
• You save elsewhere in order to overspend here
• Do optimize when you are neutralizing—but carefully
• You must achieve “good enough” status
good enough
• You do not need to do more than that
• Optimize intensely everywhere else
• Context work which does not affect competitive outcomes
• Thi is where you can “
This i h “save t invest”
to i t”
13 Dealing with Darwin © 2006, TCG Advisors LLC
August 11, 2010
14. Return on Innovation
Differentiation Neutralization
CORE CONTEXT
Competitive
Failed
Attempts Optimization
CONTEXT
Not Competitive
Waste
Sources of Waste:
• Differentiation projects that don’t go far enough
• Neutralization projects that go beyond good enough
• Unaligned innovation efforts that cancel each other out
14 Dealing with Darwin © 2009, TCG Advisors LLC
August 11, 2010
16. Where Are Your Resources Invested?
Current Core Becomes Context Over Time
Electric Cars
Entertainment Systems
Navigation Systems
Hybrid Engines
Power Steering, Brakes, Windows
Steering Brakes
Automatic Transmissions
Combustion Engines
Resources get trapped at the bottom
16 Dealing with Darwin © 2006, TCG Advisors LLC
August 11, 2010
17. Resources Get Trapped in Context
Context Core
Core
C Context
C t t
Agile
g Aged
g
Context delivers diminishing returns
Organizations become uncompetitive
17 Dealing with Darwin © 2006, TCG Advisors LLC
August 11, 2010
18. Fund Innovation
by Freeing Trapped Resources
Extract Resources from Context
to Repurpose for Core
“Coins in the Couch”
18 Dealing with Darwin © 2006, TCG Advisors LLC
August 11, 2010
19. Where Are Your Resources Deployed?
Core Context
Success increases Success does not
your competitive affect competitive
differentiation differentiation
Mission Critical
Failure is material to
your current performance 7 65
SK
RIS
Non-Mission-Critical
Failure is not material 3 25
REWARD
19 Dealing with Darwin © 2006, TCG Advisors LLC
2005,
August 11, 2010
20. The Cycle of Innovation:
What You Would Like to Have Happen
Core Context
Deploy
D l
Differentiation Manage
At Scale Mission-critical
Processes
At Scale
Mission Critical
2.
2 Deploy 3. Manage
3 M
Non-Mission-Critical Extract
Resources
Invent 1.
1 Invent 4.
4 Offload To Repurpose
Differentiated For Core
Offering
Fund next innovation
20 Dealing with Darwin © 2006, TCG Advisors LLC
August 11, 2010
21. What Actually Happens: Challenge #1
The Mission Critical Context Resource Trap
Mission-Critical
But lack of
Core Context
resources here Resources
results in failure get stuck
to deploy! here
Mission-
Mission Critical critical
risk
2. Deploy 3. Manage
Non-Mission-Critical
Resources
R Resources are
still get 1. Invent 4. Onload
Offload added here for
invested here support
21 Dealing with Darwin © 2006, TCG Advisors LLC
August 11, 2010
22. Freeing Resources Trapped in Context
The Six Levers Model
1. Centralize. Bring operations under a single authority to
reduce overhead costs and create a single decision making
decision-making
authority to manage risk
2. Standardize. Reduce the variety and variability of processes
delivering similar outputs to further reduce costs and minimize
Core Context risks.
i k
3. Modularize. Deconstruct the system into its component
subsystems and standardize interfaces for future cost
reductions.
4. Optimize. Eliminate redundant steps, automate standard
sequences, streamline remaining operations, substitute lower-
cost components, or otherwise cost- and resource-reduce.
5. Instrument. Characterize the remaining processes in terms
of the variability of key parameters and develop monitor-and-
control systems to manage their performance.
6.
6 Outsource. Drive
O tso rce Dri e processes o t of the enterprise entirel to
out entirely
further reduce overhead, variabilize costs, and minimize future
investment. Incorporate vendor use of monitor-and-control
systems into Service Level Agreement.
22 Dealing with Darwin © 2006, TCG Advisors LLC
August 11, 2010
23. What Actually Happnes: Challenge #2
The Human Resources Recycling Trap
Core Context
Mission
Critical
Enabling
Resources Resources
Wanted Available
Here Here
People being released lack the skills
to
t fill the positions being opened
th iti b i d
23 Dealing with Darwin © 2006, TCG Advisors LLC
August 11, 2010
24. Freeing Resources Trapped in Context
Resource Recycling Zones Deployers
Use conventional methods to ramp
and manage mission-critical
processes at scale
Deployment
B
Zone
Inventors
Use unconventional
methods to create and
Optimizatio
incubate new core
Invention
n
Zone
Zone
II III
C A Optimizers
I IV
on
Use the Six Levers to
extract resources from
context to repurpose
for core
Orchestrators
Manage transitions and
facilitate hand-offs
between the zones
24 Dealing with Darwin © 2006, TCG Advisors LLC
2005,
August 11, 2010
25. Perpetuating Innovation
Change Change
Gears
G Gears
G
Deployment
Zone
Optimiz
ention
one
Zon
Zo
Inve
ne
zation
Innovation flows as fast as your slowest gear
I ti fl f t l t
25 Dealing with Darwin © 2006, TCG Advisors LLC
August 11, 2010
26. Recap
• Focusing Innovation
• “Unmatchable” differentiation
• “Good enough” neutralization
• “Save to invest” optimization
• Funding Innovation
• Extract resources from context to invest in core
• Use the Six Levers—in sequence
• Recycle resources—let people use their strengths
y p p g
26 Dealing with Darwin © 2006, TCG Advisors LLC
August 11, 2010
27. 27 Dealing with Darwin © 2010, TCG Advisors LLC
August 11, 2010