![Booth Library, Eastern Illinois University ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Tendances
Tendances (20)
Similaire à Federated Search Falls Short
Similaire à Federated Search Falls Short (20)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
Federated Search Falls Short
- 1. Federated Search Falls Short Stacey Knight-Davis Karen Whisler Sarah Johnson
- 11. Database use statistics FY05-FY09
- 13. Periodical usage and satisfaction – % of patrons
- 14. Electronic resource usage and satisfaction – % of patrons
- 18. WebFeat vs. Native Databases 73.3% 78.3% 58.0% 4553 7845 Native 5.0% 109 2171 Expanded Academic ASAP Webfeat 9.5% 28.0% 26.4% 4083 15492 Native 18.5% 506 2733 JSTOR Webfeat 38.1% 54.0% 52.1% 24714 47420 Native 15.9% 375 2358 Academic Search™ Premier Webfeat Native %- WebFeat % Native minus WebFeat searches Full Record/ Searches Full Record or Full Text Searches Database
- 20. Expectations vs. Reality Librarians: resource discovery Students/Patrons: finding full text, fast
- 23. Database-dependent search techniques relevancy dates author / title / subject Full Text View keywords timeouts duplication sorting
- 24. How databases interpret keyword search for “bird flu” in WebFeat
- 25. How databases interpret keyword search for “bird flu” in WebFeat ArticleFirst = Boolean AND JSTOR = Boolean OR LexisNexis = Boolean AND, or phrase (could not duplicate) InfoTrac = Boolean AND (academic journals category) Academic Search Premier = Boolean AND + synonyms Voyager Online Catalog and I-Share = Boolean AND
- 26. How databases interpret full-text searches in WebFeat
- 27. Compare to the native interfaces…
- 28. Compare to the native interfaces…
- 34. Database activity, July-Sep 2008