TravelWise
•Télécharger en tant que PPT, PDF•
0 j'aime•884 vues
My presentation to the TravelWise Lead Teachers in Auckland
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Tendances
Tendances (20)
Similaire à TravelWise
Similaire à TravelWise (20)
Plus de Sonya Van Schaijik
Plus de Sonya Van Schaijik (20)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
TravelWise
- 2. Recount Planning for Real Day Sonya Van Schaijik Lead Teacher Newmarket School 6 June 2012 2
- 3. Hashtag #travelwise 3
- 4. How did we become involved? • Connections via Superclubsplus • An idea- meeting with the TravelWise Team 4
- 5. What is the BBC World’s biggest Assembly? #BBCassembly -What do young people like you care about? -What's most important to you? Over twenty-four hours, BBC will provide a platform for schools across the globe to debate and discuss, share -Newmarket School concerns and ideas about what really matters to them. 5
- 6. How did the day evolve? • Sharing our story on National Television • Sharing our story with the BBC • Sharing our story via Facebook and twitter. 6
- 8. Our day • http://www.newmarket.school.nz/Home/ • http://wbxapp.com/newmarketschool • TravelWise • Picasa • BBC Global Assembly • Children’s Discussion 8
- 9. Using Social Media • As teachers we use twitter, facebook and youtube. • The LPG framework that surrounds us in keeping our children safe. • Most tools are accessible by our teachers to use with our children. 9
- 10. Ongoing professional development • We check out the tools before using them with the children. • These tools we use as a staff. WEBINAR: Digital Citizenship - Using inquiry to build digital citizenship 10
- 11. Nodes between the nodes • Relationships and making connections 11
- 12. TravelWise & our children • Where to next? • Building closer relationships with a few schools. • Giving the opportunity to practise with new technology. • We have built global relationships and would like to build Auckland wide relationships. 12
- 13. Collaboration • The National Library are willing to support a collaborative workshop with our children. • We are working with minors so straight away many online tools are not acceptable. • Check do they ask for an email? • We are still investigating Google apps for education but at this stage are not yet using them with our children. 13
- 15. Global Collaboration http://www.superclubsplus.com http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldclass/ http://www.unesco.org/new/en/educati on/networks/global- networks/aspnet/ 15
- 16. Thank you Thank you for listening. @vanschaijik sonyav@newmarket.school.nz Are there any questions or comments? 16
Notes de l'éditeur
- Perceived levels of involvement were closely aligned with all participants stating that they were largely involved. Huge-buy in that was very different from previous PD initiative. Closer network of schools developed Fair ‘young cluster’ – into the second year of the PD in 2010 One leadership strand appeared problematic with principals rating this strand as being less effective than the other leadership PD. In-depth PD for 10 schools, 8 school involved in cluster level PD In-depth focus on Years 1 -4, but other year level teachers involved in cluster level PD
- Perceived levels of involvement were closely aligned with all participants stating that they were largely involved. Huge-buy in that was very different from previous PD initiative. Closer network of schools developed Fair ‘young cluster’ – into the second year of the PD in 2010 One leadership strand appeared problematic with principals rating this strand as being less effective than the other leadership PD. In-depth PD for 10 schools, 8 school involved in cluster level PD In-depth focus on Years 1 -4, but other year level teachers involved in cluster level PD
- Perceived levels of involvement were closely aligned with all participants stating that they were largely involved. Huge-buy in that was very different from previous PD initiative. Closer network of schools developed Fair ‘young cluster’ – into the second year of the PD in 2010 One leadership strand appeared problematic with principals rating this strand as being less effective than the other leadership PD. In-depth PD for 10 schools, 8 school involved in cluster level PD In-depth focus on Years 1 -4, but other year level teachers involved in cluster level PD
- Perceived levels of involvement were closely aligned with all participants stating that they were largely involved. Huge-buy in that was very different from previous PD initiative. Closer network of schools developed Fair ‘young cluster’ – into the second year of the PD in 2010 One leadership strand appeared problematic with principals rating this strand as being less effective than the other leadership PD. In-depth PD for 10 schools, 8 school involved in cluster level PD In-depth focus on Years 1 -4, but other year level teachers involved in cluster level PD
- Perceived levels of involvement were closely aligned with all participants stating that they were largely involved. Huge-buy in that was very different from previous PD initiative. Closer network of schools developed Fair ‘young cluster’ – into the second year of the PD in 2010 One leadership strand appeared problematic with principals rating this strand as being less effective than the other leadership PD. In-depth PD for 10 schools, 8 school involved in cluster level PD In-depth focus on Years 1 -4, but other year level teachers involved in cluster level PD
- Perceived levels of involvement were closely aligned with all participants stating that they were largely involved. Huge-buy in that was very different from previous PD initiative. Closer network of schools developed Fair ‘young cluster’ – into the second year of the PD in 2010 One leadership strand appeared problematic with principals rating this strand as being less effective than the other leadership PD. In-depth PD for 10 schools, 8 school involved in cluster level PD In-depth focus on Years 1 -4, but other year level teachers involved in cluster level PD
- Perceived levels of involvement were closely aligned with all participants stating that they were largely involved. Huge-buy in that was very different from previous PD initiative. Closer network of schools developed Fair ‘young cluster’ – into the second year of the PD in 2010 One leadership strand appeared problematic with principals rating this strand as being less effective than the other leadership PD. In-depth PD for 10 schools, 8 school involved in cluster level PD In-depth focus on Years 1 -4, but other year level teachers involved in cluster level PD
- Perceived levels of involvement were closely aligned with all participants stating that they were largely involved. Huge-buy in that was very different from previous PD initiative. Closer network of schools developed Fair ‘young cluster’ – into the second year of the PD in 2010 One leadership strand appeared problematic with principals rating this strand as being less effective than the other leadership PD. In-depth PD for 10 schools, 8 school involved in cluster level PD In-depth focus on Years 1 -4, but other year level teachers involved in cluster level PD
- Perceived levels of involvement were closely aligned with all participants stating that they were largely involved. Huge-buy in that was very different from previous PD initiative. Closer network of schools developed Fair ‘young cluster’ – into the second year of the PD in 2010 One leadership strand appeared problematic with principals rating this strand as being less effective than the other leadership PD. In-depth PD for 10 schools, 8 school involved in cluster level PD In-depth focus on Years 1 -4, but other year level teachers involved in cluster level PD