2. Washtenaw County Target Populations and Communities and Selected Health Outcomes, Behavior and Environmental Risk Factors – 2005 HIP Survey Data
Adreanne Waller, MPH – Washtenaw County Public Health – updated 3/21/11
Jurisdiction Target Target Target Target High Risk High Risk High Risk High Risk
Wide Community Community Community Community Population Population Population Population
Washtenaw Western Other Less than African
Ann Arbor Ypsilanti
p <$35,000
, Unemployed
p y
County
C t Washtenaw
W ht Washtenaw
W ht High School
Hi h S h l American
A i
Health Outcomes
Overweight adults 50% 43% 53% 56% 57% 57% 69% 58% 66%
Overweight children 10% 9% 14% 18% 4% 38% n/a 12% 27%
Diabetes 9% 7% 10% 9% 8% 15% 26% 38% 23%
Stroke 2% 1% 3% 1% 3% 3% 12% 7% 2%
CHD 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 12% 7% 2%
HBP 19% 14% 26% 26% 17% 22% 42% 40% 38%
Physical Activity
No physical activity for exercise 24% 17% 27% 24% 35% 24% 46% 25% 26%
Screen time 8+ hours/day 10% 11% 5% 27% 6% 10% 9% 39% 28%
Child never walks to school
Child lk h l 86% 75% 86% 93% 100% 78% n/a
/ n/a
/ 87%
Child screen time 3.5hrs or more 6% 8% 9% 4% 3% 28% n/a n/a 12%
Disagree Walking areas in neighborhood 21% 12% 16% 38% 44% 17% 29% 21% 24%
Disagree Feel safe walking in neighborhood 7% 5% 10% 4% 11% 9% 12% 26% 8%
Zero short trips (<.5 miles) walked/week 63% 47% 56% 86% 93% 51% 80% 79% 51%
Never use bicycle as transportation 57% 41% 57% 79% 75% 54% 77% 50% 64%
Nutrition
Adults Consume less than five servings
75% 67% 88% 81% 66% 84% 93% 79% 87%
fruits&vegs/day
Children consume less than five servings
87% 94% 78% 77% 98% 76% n/a n/a 77%
fruits&vegs/day
Fast food two or more times/week
/ 18% 14% 23% 38% 6% 22% 28% 37% 27%
Child two or more servings soda/day 12% 7% 20% 5% 18% 14% n/a n/a 17%
Child never breastfed 27% 19% 30% 27% 37% 53% n/a n/a 52%
Food Insecure 5% 3% 7% 4% 5% 12% 13% 35% 24%
Disagree Easy access to walking destinations
43% 35% 41% 54% 62% 29% 53% 43% 34%
(usually food)
Tobacco
Currently Smoke 16% 10% 25% 20% 9% 30% 22% 21% 23%
Alcohol
Binge Drank Past Month 14% 10% 18% 22% 11% 77% 83% 85% 89%
Social Support
Always/Usually Sufficient Emotional
81% 80% 82% 79% 89% 77% 72% 64% 65%
Support
6. May CHC Table Talk
May CHC Table Talk
1.How can existing systems be better linked to support
. o ca e st g syste s be bette ed to suppo t
youth facing multiple challenges?
2.Which community organizations should “WAY” consider partnering
2 Whi h it i ti h ld “WAY” id t i
with, and why?
3.Which community organizations should “RAHS” consider partnering
with, and why?
4. How does your organization support struggling young people? What
new ways could you imagine supporting them?