May 2011 CHC academics and health
•
0 j'aime•690 vues
The Washtenaw County Health Improvement's presentation on the link between Academics and Health.
Recommandé
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Similaire à May 2011 CHC academics and health
Similaire à May 2011 CHC academics and health (20)
Plus de University of Michigan Taubman Health Sciences Library
Plus de University of Michigan Taubman Health Sciences Library (20)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
May 2011 CHC academics and health
- 1. Health and Academics: Linked for Success Health and Academics: Linked for Success Community Health Committee Meeting May 17th, 2011
- 2. Washtenaw County Target Populations and Communities and Selected Health Outcomes, Behavior and Environmental Risk Factors – 2005 HIP Survey Data Adreanne Waller, MPH – Washtenaw County Public Health – updated 3/21/11 Jurisdiction Target Target Target Target High Risk High Risk High Risk High Risk Wide Community Community Community Community Population Population Population Population Washtenaw Western Other Less than African Ann Arbor Ypsilanti p <$35,000 , Unemployed p y County C t Washtenaw W ht Washtenaw W ht High School Hi h S h l American A i Health Outcomes Overweight adults 50% 43% 53% 56% 57% 57% 69% 58% 66% Overweight children 10% 9% 14% 18% 4% 38% n/a 12% 27% Diabetes 9% 7% 10% 9% 8% 15% 26% 38% 23% Stroke 2% 1% 3% 1% 3% 3% 12% 7% 2% CHD 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 12% 7% 2% HBP 19% 14% 26% 26% 17% 22% 42% 40% 38% Physical Activity No physical activity for exercise 24% 17% 27% 24% 35% 24% 46% 25% 26% Screen time 8+ hours/day 10% 11% 5% 27% 6% 10% 9% 39% 28% Child never walks to school Child lk h l 86% 75% 86% 93% 100% 78% n/a / n/a / 87% Child screen time 3.5hrs or more 6% 8% 9% 4% 3% 28% n/a n/a 12% Disagree Walking areas in neighborhood 21% 12% 16% 38% 44% 17% 29% 21% 24% Disagree Feel safe walking in neighborhood 7% 5% 10% 4% 11% 9% 12% 26% 8% Zero short trips (<.5 miles) walked/week 63% 47% 56% 86% 93% 51% 80% 79% 51% Never use bicycle as transportation 57% 41% 57% 79% 75% 54% 77% 50% 64% Nutrition Adults Consume less than five servings 75% 67% 88% 81% 66% 84% 93% 79% 87% fruits&vegs/day Children consume less than five servings 87% 94% 78% 77% 98% 76% n/a n/a 77% fruits&vegs/day Fast food two or more times/week / 18% 14% 23% 38% 6% 22% 28% 37% 27% Child two or more servings soda/day 12% 7% 20% 5% 18% 14% n/a n/a 17% Child never breastfed 27% 19% 30% 27% 37% 53% n/a n/a 52% Food Insecure 5% 3% 7% 4% 5% 12% 13% 35% 24% Disagree Easy access to walking destinations 43% 35% 41% 54% 62% 29% 53% 43% 34% (usually food) Tobacco Currently Smoke 16% 10% 25% 20% 9% 30% 22% 21% 23% Alcohol Binge Drank Past Month 14% 10% 18% 22% 11% 77% 83% 85% 89% Social Support Always/Usually Sufficient Emotional 81% 80% 82% 79% 89% 77% 72% 64% 65% Support
- 6. May CHC Table Talk May CHC Table Talk 1.How can existing systems be better linked to support . o ca e st g syste s be bette ed to suppo t youth facing multiple challenges? 2.Which community organizations should “WAY” consider partnering 2 Whi h it i ti h ld “WAY” id t i with, and why? 3.Which community organizations should “RAHS” consider partnering with, and why? 4. How does your organization support struggling young people? What new ways could you imagine supporting them?