CIOs are under pressure. Some analysts are even predicting the end of the CIO role. In the light of digitalisation and an ever-increasing need for business agility, IT is becoming an embedded part of the business. Information technology is no longer just a utility but a deeply integrated driver of products and services within most companies. An ever-changing environment means that old assumptions on how to deliver IT services need to be revisited if the IT organisation is to remain relevant.
The Abortion pills for sale in Qatar@Doha [+27737758557] []Deira Dubai Kuwait
Leveraging IT to create business agility: Why leading IT organisations are revisiting old assumptions
1. 1
3GAMMA INSIGHTS
LEVERAGING IT TO CREATE
BUSINESS AGILITY
Why leading IT organisations are
revisiting old assumptions
Seamus O’Sullivan
Jens Ekberg
2. 2
CIOs are under pressure. Some analysts are even predicting the end of the CIO role.
In the light of digitalisation and an ever-increasing need for business agility, IT is
becoming an embedded part of the business. Information technology is no longer
just a utility but a deeply integrated driver of products and services within most
companies. An ever-changing environment means that old assumptions on how to
deliver IT services need to be revisited if the IT organisation is to remain relevant.
December 2015
3. 3
A fundamental set of assumptions has traditionally underpinned the role of the IT organisation in the value
chain. The assumptions are, in some organisations, so deeply ingrained that they are taken for truths. Failing
to revisit these will increase the divide between IT and the business and will undoubtedly undermine the IT
organisation’s ability to support and drive digitalisation and business agility. More importantly, it will under-
mine the business’ competitive strength.
“For too long we have been busy with our own internal issues.
It is about time we focus our efforts on the business. Our role
is to manage the complexity, not eradicate it. We need to
embrace change, not try to stop it through standardisation”
– Director, IT operations, 3gamma client
In 3gamma’s experience, there are three dominant cost/flexibility-assumptions currently held by many IT
organisations:
• Assumption 1: Standardised IT processes and large scale outsourced deliveries reduce cost
and create efficiency
A 3gamma review of IT outsourcing contracts from the last decade highlights this as one of the deepest
held assumptions within IT organisations. The focus has been on standardising tickets, service requests,
server configurations, processes interfaces etc. Perceived economies of scale with service providers and an
ambition to lower unit costs have motivated IT organisations to enter into long contract times. In addition,
IT organisations have been trying to reduce dependency on knowledge and professionalism and build these
into a set of standardised processes driving automation.
• Assumption 2: A consolidated information technology environment is a strategic asset and
a justified end in itself
Many IT architecture transformations during the last couple of years have focused on creating highly
consolidated architectures on the assumption that these create efficiency and transparency. Consequently,
many companies have created monolithic consolidated solutions implemented via off-the-shelf enterprise
resource planning (ERP) systems, methodologies and technology standardisations.
• Assumption 3: IT organisations should be based on a distinction between development and
operations
To build specialised knowledge, implement common processes and realise economies of scale, IT functions
have been grouped together based on their role in an internal value chain. This has typically taken the form
of a separation between operations/maintenance and development, creating separated IT staff functions
with their own capabilities.
Taken together, these assumptions paint the picture of an IT factory focusing on delivering a limited, standard-
ised set of products with a standardised set of processes. IT organisations have invested heavily in these ways of
working, but solutions based on these assumptions often fail to deliver the promised efficiencies. Coupled with
an unfocused organic growth of workarounds to customise the ERP solutions, this has led to a consolidated,
tightly integrated IT environment with very low flexibility to meet evolving requirements. This has also accen-
tuated the bull-whip effects in the delivery of IT services.
The unpredictable real world of business means circumstances change and the solutions and approaches must
change with them.
4. 4
Conscious decisions must be made to ensure
business alignment of IT
In a number of recent 3gamma engagements, we have experienced the adverse effects of these assumptions. At
one company, a project was unable to pilot test its solution, as the required service request wasn’t part of the
services contracted in the infrastructure outsourcing agreement, and the IT organisation’s governance policy
didn’t allow other providers. In another, the IT organisation focused all their energy on internal projects such
as transitioning infrastructure across data centres, while informing the business that new requirements would
have to be met sometime within next fiscal year. Faced with IT being an obstacle, the business chose another
solution outside of the IT organisation’s control.
This ‘shadow IT’ behaviour is not uncommon. In a recent study of UK financial institutions, 44% of surveyed
organisations said that the business had bypassed the IT department to procure public cloud infrastructure.1
In addition, a recent Gartner article reported that eighty-one percent of respondents in Western Europe said
they regularly approach IT to solve technical issues, but only 28 percent would go to IT for best practice advice
on how to use technology.2
IT organisations must move from production unit to
business partner
Digitalisation impacts IT in a fundamental way. It brings about market fragmentation, disruptive business
models, decreasing product volumes, increased customisation and shorter product and service life-cycles. In
view of this, consider the adverse effects of current
assumptions: lock-in effects, lead times, complexity
and legacy. The divide created by these assumptions
is significant.
To bridge this divide, organisations need to become
more nimble, agile and flexible. IT organisations and
their IT strategies need to account for fragmentation
and variety. They need to embrace uncertainty and
accept that the business has to change continuously.
In doing so they need to acquire, control and man-
age a diverse set of internal and external capabilities.
These capabilities and their components need to be
managed as a portfolio that is continuously opti-
mised and improved.
Based on 3gamma research, forward-looking IT
organisations should leverage three key tools in
order to find the optimal cost/flexibility trade-off in
their business context:
• Process design trade-offs: balancing business
responsiveness with efficiency demands across
the value chain.
• Capability scoping: setting the scope for the internal IT organisation in relation to vendors, partners and
customers/users, and securing configuration of the capability setup.
• Technology integration and decoupling: defining and implementing a balanced IT architecture aligned
with business and IT processes, together with a mix of internal and external capabilities that can be recon-
figured to meet ever-changing requirements.
Process design trade-offs
Process responsiveness is key to managing variety. In The state of ITSM in agile organisations 3
, 3gamma
identified customer centricity, communication, continuous improvement and the ability to remove obstacles,
Flexibility
Cost
High
HighLow
Low
Optimisation of the
cost/flexibility trade-off
Traditional trade-off
between cost and flexibility
Needed zone of alignment
to achieve superior
performance
ITtoolbox
Process design trade-offs
Balancing process efficiency and responsiveness across the value chain
Technology integration and decoupling
Balancing consolidation, integration with decoupling in IT architectures
Capability scoping
Scoping internal and external capabilities and optimising configuration
OPTIMISING THE COST/FLEXIBILITY TRADE-OFF
5. 5
as core competencies of high performing IT organisations. 3gamma’s recent research 4
on how to set up a ser-
vice management office identified the need for cross-team collaboration and a balanced level of governance in
line with the companies’ maturity and business logic. High performance is created by responsiveness across
technology, processes and organisation: a responsiveness that is based on the needs of the business and not
defined by any specific framework or solution. The responsiveness needs to be cascaded through the various
organisational units and service providers involved in the value chain; from demand to supply. To support this
setup, IT organisations need to become service integrators that manage a complex supply network.
In light of the cost/flexibility trade-off, the interface between IT and business has to be responsive and informa-
tion must flow freely in the value chain. To achieve this, the value chain needs to be reconfigured:
• IT organisations should strive to minimise the number of handovers from customer to service provider.
This doesn’t necessarily mean insourcing, but it does mean that the relationship with service providers
needs to change from a transactional interaction to a collaborative relationship.
• IT delivery teams should include a comprehensive set of capabilities to deliver from development to oper-
ations and have as few external dependencies as possible. This includes capabilities such as IT risk, IT
solution architecture etc.
• Teams should be autonomous and fit for the task. Cross-team processes create dependencies and introduce
complexity; these should be minimised and be kept to the essentials.
However, the value chain still needs to be anchored to the overall business strategy and be supported by an
overarching enterprise architecture capability.
The level of process responsiveness required may differ between different parts of the IT organisation. Products
and services requiring responsiveness need a different operational model than those that do not. The require-
ments need to be understood and IT organisations should adopt the “operations within an operation” concept
to create focused strategies for each specific segment of the business. A responsive operational model is based
on an adaptable process setup, different capabilities and a de-coupled IT architecture. Adopting this approach
will help to optimise the cost structure of the IT organisation. As noted by Gartner 5
, operating in a bi-modal
responsive mode is key to improving performance. Without it, the risk of shadow IT illustrated by the examples
given above is significant.
Capability scoping
Being responsive and focused isn’t enough. In a turbulent environment, the value of a specific capability is
transitory, which is why IT organisations need access to a constant flow of new capabilities. Existing strengths
and assets can become obsolete almost overnight. Major investments, both in monetary terms and through their
lead time to implementation, detract focus and can result in immobile assets with potentially short life-spans.
In the worst cases, the planned solution has become obsolete before the project has even delivered it.
“In a fast-paced economy, innovation is likely to occur outside
of the legal structure of the company. Innovative capabilities
need to be acquired and incorporated into an organisation
through an outside-in approach to support an organisation’s
innovation agenda.”
– From “Unleashing IT’s potential” by 3gamma
Several analysts (e.g. KPMG6
and ISG7
) note that there is an ongoing shift in the market from cost reduction
focused outsourcing, to acquiring new technology and talent. It is not about long-term relationships focused
on operations, but rather about specialised implementation services. It is about moving fast and leveraging
6. 6
specialised knowledge. In this context, IT organisations need to become service integrators managing a flexible
service provider base and a constant churn in the service provider portfolio.
Technology integration and decoupling
In the software-defined era, emphasis shifts from centralised governance and consolidation to distributed
knowledge, autonomy and loose coupling. Examples of this include the emergence of container architectures,
microservices and network function virtualisation (NFV).
“the ability to manage a diverse architectural landscape is a
competitive advantage”
Enterprise architecture is the discipline needed to enable IT organisations to leverage external solutions in a
flexible way. In a recent whitepaper8
, 3gamma outlined three blueprints for aligning IT and integration architec-
tures with operational excellence, customer intimacy and digital innovation. A key finding was that companies
looking for innovation need to move to a more modular architecture, avoiding the lock-in effects of consolidated
ERP systems. The resulting lack of an integrated reporting capability can be offset by an advanced analytical
capability encompassing the loosely coupled applications and components.
A logical consequence of this approach is fragmentation and an increased architectural complexity. This com-
plexity is unavoidable but not unmanageable. It does however highlight the fact that the ability to manage a
diverse architectural landscape, delivered by a mix of internal and external solutions, is a competitive advantage.
As noted by other analysts9
, transforming and modernising legacy environments will be complex regardless of
approach.
The path to optimisation of IT is unique for each IT organisation
and needs to be incremental
There is no clear route to optimisation. It requires an understanding of context, current state and the overall
objectives for the IT organisation and the business as a whole. Many established companies are now engaged
in simplification and legacy modernisation initiatives. Approaching change as one-off transformations may in
some cases be required, but the transformation approach is likely to have significant negative effects. Under
uncertain conditions, big bets are risky and approaching these concepts top-down and driving them as trans-
formation initiatives requires substantial up-front investment and analysis. However, approaching them in
an ‘incept, evolve and expand’ way has significant potential as it allows for low risk failure, early learning, and
rapid evolution.
Time
ImplementProcure Run Replace
Short run-phase means a
short period where a
company can capitalise on
the investment
Time
ImplementProcure Run Replace
Reduced capital expenditure and
a robust service integration
process will improve the business
case
SHORTER LIFE-CYCLES UNDERMINE BUSINESS CASES, REQUIRING A MORE
INCREMENTAL APPROACH TO IT INVESTMENTS
7. 7
When the expected life-span of a given solution, asset or process becomes shorter, it will impact the expected
return on the investment. Consequently, it follows that the size of the investment needs to be adjusted. IT organ-
isations need to apply a more iterative approach to strategy formulation and favour continuous improvement
for people, process and technology. This also speaks in favour of modularisation in order to reduce the size of
the implementation projects. Key findings on delivering IT projects from CIO Insight10
highlight that “reducing
efforts into smaller, more piecemeal initiatives makes them more manageable” and that companies should strive
to minimise interdependencies among these ‘mini’ projects.
With rising complexity, the role of the CIO is changing. An inward focus on internal issues detracts focus and
energy from business development and change. It also fosters a culture of IT vs. business. The cost efficiency
requirements are still there, but forward-looking IT organisations can’t afford to use the same toolbox deployed
historically. They need to shift balance and revisit old assumptions:
• Standardisation can’t be used as a general rule of thumb as it undermines flexibility and customisation
• Highly consolidated architectures coupled with long-term outsourcing contracts may be unfavourable
when adopting new technology and solutions
• Functional specialisation and division of labour risk creating inefficient and disjointed IT processes
To remain relevant, these IT factory based assumptions used in the past need to be balanced against the respon-
sive business needs of the present.
About the authors
Seamus O’Sullivan is a leading programme manager delivering major change projects for clients of 3gamma
UK. An engineer by training, Seamus is a Prince, SCRUM, MSP, MoP and MBA qualified Project / Programme
Manager with over 18 years’ experience.
Jens Ekberg is a Director and senior IT management consultant in 3gamma. He is specialised in IT strategy,
IT architecture and IT transformation. Jens works across industries supporting clients in IT-enabled business
change working in the intersection between business and technology. Jens holds dual degrees in engineering
and business administration.
References
1. http://business-reporter.co.uk/2015/09/13/why-hybrid-cloud-is-the-right-investment-for-financial-organisations/
2. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3166817
3. http://www.3gamma.com/media/2014/02/state-of-itsm-agile-organizations.pdf
4. http://www.3gamma.com/insight/the-service-management-office/
5. http://www.forbes.com/sites/gartnergroup/2015/07/13/why-business-needs-bimodal-it/2/
6. https://www.kpmg-institutes.com/institutes/shared-services-outsourcing-institute/events/2015/07/podcast-it-insourcing-vs-out-
sourcing.html
7. http://blog.isg-one.com/2015/08/03/the-high-five-for-outsourcing-growth/
8. http://www.3gamma.com/media/2014/12/managing-technlogy-in-an-ever-changing-environment.pdf
9. http://www.mckinsey.com/Insights/Business_Technology/Two_ways_to_modernize_IT_systems_for_the_digital_era/
10. http://www.cioinsight.com/it-management/leadership/slideshows/why-big-it-projects-fall-short-of-expectations.html
8. 8
ABOUT 3GAMMA
3gamma is a leading professional services firm focusing on IT management. As an independent specialist
in IT management, 3gamma provides advisory, consulting services and fact-based insights to many of the
world’s most respected companies. 3gamma operates globally from offices across the Nordics and UK.
3gamma is a knowledge firm that bases its expertise on six core capabilities:
• Strategy & Governance
• Emerging Technologies
• Sourcing & Legal
• Risk & Assurance
• Operational Excellence
• Transformation & Change
3gamma Insights brings leading-edge thinking at the intersection of IT and business, illuminating central
topics relevant to CIOs and decision makers.
GROUP HEAD OFFICE
3gamma Sweden AB
Drottningtorget 5
SE-411 03 Göteborg
Sweden
Phone: +46 31 309 7910
STOCKHOLM
3gamma Sweden AB
Centralplan 15
SE-111 20 Stockholm
Sweden
Phone: +46 8 748 0330
FINLAND
3gamma OY
Sentnerikuja 2
FI-00440 Helsinki
Phone +358 50 3 748 371
DENMARK
3gamma ApS
Frederiksborggade 15
DK-1360 Copenhagen K
Phone: +45 53 700 400
MALMÖ
3gamma Sweden AB
WTC Teknikportalen
Skeppsgatan 19
SE-211 19 Malmö
Sweden
Phone : +46 40 627 04 05
UNITED KINGDOM
3gamma UK Ltd
River Court,
3 The Meadows Business Park
Station Approach, Blackwater
Surrey GU17 9ABL
United Kingdom
Phone +44 192 879 6800
UNITED KINGDOM
3gamma Ltd
Manchester Business Park
3000 Aviator Way
Manchester M22 5TG
Phone +44 192 879 6800
3GAMMA INSIGHTS