course materials

1. Recommending an Evidence Based Practice Change PPT
Recommending an Evidence Based Practice Change PPTRecommending an Evidence Based
Practice Change PPTThe collection of evidence is an activity that occurs with an endgame in
mind. For example, law enforcement professionals collect evidence to a decision to charge
those accused of criminal activity. Similarly, evidence-based healthcare practitioners collect
evidence to decisions in pursuit of specific healthcare outcomes.In this Assignment, you
will identify an issue or opportunity for change within your healthcare organization and
propose an idea for a change in practice ed by an EBP approach. Recommending an
Evidence Based Practice Change PPTTo Prepare:Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles
you critically appraised in Module 4, related to your clinical topic of interest and
PICOT.Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential
opportunities for evidence-based change, using your topic of interest and PICOT as the basis
for your reflection.The Assignment: (Evidence-Based Project)Part 5: Recommending an
Evidence-Based Practice ChangeCreate an 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation in which
you do the following:Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and
readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as
your company name.)Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in
this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue,
the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in
general.Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to
decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient
evidence is not discovered.Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change,
including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and
implementation.Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the
implementation of this evidence-based change.Be sure to provide APA citations of the ing
evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to your thinking.Add a lessons learned
section that includes the following:A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed
articles you previously submittedAn explanation about what you learned from completing
the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (1-3
slides)Module05_Week09_Assignment_RubricPART 5: RECOMMENDING AN EVIDENCE-
BASED PRACTICE CHANGECREATE AN 8- TO 9-SLIDE POWERPOINT PRESENTATION IN
WHICH YOU DO THE FOLLOWING:· BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR HEALTHCARE
ORGANIZATION, INCLUDING ITS CULTURE AND READINESS FOR CHANGE.· DESCRIBE THE
CURRENT PROBLEM OR OPPORTUNITY FOR CHANGE. INCLUDE IN THIS DESCRIPTION

2. THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING THE NEED FOR CHANGE, THE SCOPE OF THE ISSUE,
THE STAKEHOLDERS INVOLVED, AND THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH CHANGE
IMPLEMENTATION IN GENERAL.—Excellent 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)The presentation clearly
and accurately describes in detail a healthcare organization, including a detailed
explanation of its culture and readiness for change.The presentation clearly and accurately
describes in detail a current problem or opportunity for change.An accurate, specific, and
detailed description of the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the
issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in
general is provided. Recommending an Evidence Based Practice Change
PPTGood 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)The presentation accurately describes a healthcare
organization, including an accurate explanation of its culture and readiness for change.The
presentation accurately describes a current problem or opportunity for change.An accurate
description of the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue,
the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with the change implementation in
general is provided.Fair 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)The presentation inaccurately or vaguely
describes a healthcare organization, including an inaccurate or vague explanation of its
culture and readiness for change.The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes a
current problem or opportunity for change.An inaccurate or vague description of the
circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders
involved, and the risks associated with the change implementation in general is
provided.Poor 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes a
healthcare organization, including an inaccurate and vague explanation of its culture and
readiness for change, or is missing.The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes a
current problem or opportunity for change or is missing.An inaccurate and vague
description of the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue,
the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with the change implementation in
general is provided or is missing.· PROPOSE AN EVIDENCE-BASED IDEA FOR A CHANGE IN
PRACTICE USING AN EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE APPROACH TO DECISION MAKING.
NOTE THAT YOU MAY FIND FURTHER RESEARCH NEEDS TO BE CONDUCTED IF
SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE IS NOT DISCOVERED.· DESCRIBE YOUR PLAN FOR KNOWLEDGE
TRANSFER OF THIS CHANGE, INCLUDING KNOWLEDGE CREATION, DISSEMINATION, AND
ORGANIZATIONAL ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION.· DESCRIBE THE MEASURABLE
OUTCOMES YOU HOPE TO ACHIEVE WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS EVIDENCE-
BASED CHANGE.· BE SURE TO PROVIDE APA CITATIONS OF THE ING EVIDENCE-BASED
PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLES YOU SELECTED TO YOUR THINKING.—Excellent 32 (32%) –
35 (35%)The presentation clearly and accurately proposes in detail an evidence-based idea
for a change in practice that is fully aligned to an evidence-based practice approach for
decision making. Recommending an Evidence Based Practice Change PPTThe presentation
clearly and accurately describes in detail a plan for knowledge transfer of this change,
including a detailed plan for knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational
adoption and implementation that is specific.The presentation clearly and accurately
describes in detail the measurable outcomes desired for the implementation of the
evidence-based change.The presentation includes accurate, complete, and full APA citations

3. of the ing evidence-based peer-reviewed articles selected.Good 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)The
presentation accurately proposes an evidence-based idea for a change in practice that is
adequately aligned to an evidence-based practice approach for decision making.The
presentation accurately describes a plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including a
plan for knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and
implementation that is adequate.The presentation accurately describes the measurable
outcomes desired for the implementation of the evidence-based changes.The presentation
includes accurate APA citations of the ing evidence-based peer-reviewed articles
selected.Fair 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)The presentation inaccurately or vaguely proposes an
evidence-based idea for a change in practice that may be aligned to an evidence-based
practice approach for decision making.The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes a
plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including a plan for knowledge creation,
dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation that may be relevant.The
presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the measurable outcomes desired for the
implementation of the evidence-based change.Inaccurate and incomplete APA citations of
the ing evidence-based peer-reviewed articles selected are provided.Poor 0 (0%) –
24 (24%)The presentation inaccurately and vaguely proposes an evidence-based idea for a
change in practice that is not aligned to an evidence-based practice approach for decision
making or is missing.The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes a plan for
knowledge transfer of this change, including a plan for knowledge creation, dissemination,
and organizational adoption that implementation that is incomplete, or is missing.The
presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the measurable outcomes desired for the
implementation of the evidence-based change or is missing.Inaccurate and incomplete APA
citations of the ing evidence-based peer-reviewed articles selected are provided or are
missing.ADD A LESSONS LEARNED SECTION THAT INCLUDES:· A SUMMARY OF THE
CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLES YOU PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.·
WHAT DID YOU LEARN FROM COMPLETING THE EVALUATION TABLE?—
Excellent 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)The presentation clearly and accurately summarizes in detail
the critical appraisal process of the peer-reviewed articles previously submitted.The
presentation thoroughly describes in detail at least one lesson learned from completing the
evaluation table that is specific.The presentation thoroughly describes in detail at least one
lesson learned from completing the levels of evidence table that is specific.The presentation
thoroughly describes in detail at least one lesson learned from completing the outcomes
synthesis table that is specific.The presentation provides a complete, detailed, and specific
synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on the lessons learned explained. The
presentation fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific
resources that fully the presentation.Good 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)The presentation
accurately summarizes the critical appraisal process of the peer-reviewed articles
previously submitted.The presentation accurately describes at least one lesson learned
from completing the evaluation table that may include some specificity.The presentation
accurately describes at least one lesson learned from completing the levels of evidence table
that may include some specificity.The presentation accurately describes at least one lesson
learned from completing the outcomes synthesis table that may include some

4. specificity.The presentation provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource
reviewed related to the lessons learned explained. The presentation integrates at least one
outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may the
presentation.Fair 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)The presentation inaccurately or vaguely
summarizes the critical appraisal process of the peer-reviewed articles previously
submitted.The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes at least one lesson learned
from completing the evaluation table and may lack some specificity.The presentation
inaccurately or vaguely describes at least one lesson learned from completing the levels of
evidence table and may lack some specificity.The presentation inaccurately or vaguely
describes at least one lesson learned from completing the outcomes synthesis table and
may lack some specificity.The presentation provides a vague or inaccurate synthesis of
outside resources reviewed related to the lessons learned explained. The response
minimally integrates resources that may the presentation.Poor 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)The
presentation inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the critical appraisal process of the
peer-reviewed articles previously submitted or is missing.The presentation inaccurately
and vaguely describes at least one lesson learned from completing the evaluation table and
lacks specificity or is missing.The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes at least
one lesson learned from completing the levels of evidence table that lacks specificity or is
missing.The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes at least one lesson learned
from completing the outcomes synthesis table that lacks specificity or is missing.The
presentation provides a vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources related to
the lessons learned explained or is missing. The presentation fails to incorporate any
resources to the responses provided.WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING—
PARAGRAPH DEVELOPMENT AND ORGANIZATION:PARAGRAPHS MAKE CLEAR POINTS
THAT WELL-DEVELOPED IDEAS, FLOW LOGICALLY, AND DEMONSTRATE CONTINUITY
OF IDEAS. SENTENCES ARE CAREFULLY FOCUSED—NEITHER LONG AND RAMBLING NOR
SHORT AND LACKING SUBSTANCE. A CLEAR AND COMPREHENSIVE PURPOSE
STATEMENT AND INTRODUCTION IS PROVIDED WHICH DELINEATES ALL REQUIRED
CRITERIA.—Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards
for flow, continuity, and clarity.A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction,
and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.Good 4 (4%) –
4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity
80% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is
brief and not descriptive.Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow
writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.Purpose,
introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.Poor 0 (0%) –
3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity
less than 60% of the time.No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was
provided.WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING—ENGLISH WRITING STANDARDS:
CORRECT GRAMMAR, MECHANICS, AND PROPER PUNCTUATION.—Excellent 5 (5%) –
5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.Good 4 (4%) –
4 (4%)Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation
errors.Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and

5. punctuation errors.Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling,
and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.WRITTEN
EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING—THE PAPER FOLLOWS CORRECT FORMAT FOR TITLE
PAGE, HEADINGS, FONT, SPACING, MARGINS, INDENTATIONS, PAGE NUMBERS, RUNNING
HEAD, PARENTHETICAL/IN-TEXT CITATIONS, AND REFERENCE LIST.—Excellent 5 (5%) –
5 (5%)Uses correct paper formatting with no errors.Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few
(one or two) paper formatting errors.Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (three or
four) paper formatting errors.Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (five or more) paper
formatting
errors.part_4b_critical_appraisal_of_research__1_.docxpart_4a_critical_appraisal_of_research
_2complete__1_.doc