An analysis of trade treaty networks (bilateral investment treaties and multilateral agreements) using Social Network Analysis to establish a correlation between signing of treaties and FDI inflows into developing countries. This analysis used UCINet 6 and Tableau 10 to visualize the data.
Call Girls Begur Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Girl Service Bangalore
DO TRADE TREATIES INFLUENCE FDI FLOWS?
1. DO TRADE TREATIES INFLUENCE FDI FLOWS?
SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS: FALL 2016
ABRAHAM CHERIAN
Does signing international trade and investment treaties make developing countries
more attractive hosts in the eyes of foreign investors?
using
2. What are BITs? A bilateral investment treaty (BIT) is an agreement establishing the terms and
conditions for private investment by nationals and companies of one state in another state.
Scholars and arbitrators have recognized that common principles underlie investment treaties. BITs
typically provide for:
Compensation in case of expropriation.
Fair and equitable treatment of investment.
Full protection and security.
Non-discrimination (national and most-favored nation treatment).
Multilateral Trade Agreements
are agreements on trade issues between three or
more countries. They are difficult to negotiate
because of their complexity, but once agreed upon,
they are very powerful and beneficial for the nations
involved, giving each nation equal status in terms
of trade and investments.
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
is an investment made by a company or individual
from one country in business interests of another
country, in the form of either establishing business
operations or acquiring business assets in the other
country, such as ownership or controlling interest in a
foreign company.
TREATIES, TRADE & FDI
3000
BITs
Since
1959
3. Are Trade Treaties and FDI related?
• A BIT has considerable effect on capital goods
imports and on imports of differentiated goods
• Studies suggest a strong positive correlation
between the signing of bilateral investment
treaties and increased inflows of foreign capital
investments, even when controlling for a host of
other country-level characteristics
• Monterrey Consensus(2002) challenge : overcome
the concentration of FDI in a few (large and
relatively advanced) developing countries
HOW DO TREATIES AFFECT FDI?
FDI Inflow
XX: Network Degree
4. Does signing of Bilateral Investment Treaties and joining Multilateral
Trade Agreements lead to higher FDI flows for developing countries?
TREATIES NOT WORKING FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES?
Capital
*favorable tax schemes
*investment subsidies
*advantageous regulations
*exemptions
More BITs
Reduce domestic
policy autonomy
…..but, some developing countries are
struggling to attract significant levels of
FDI
5. SIGNING TRADE TREATIES DOES NOT IMPROVE FDI FLOWS
AMONG DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
*Network Efficiency(Measure of connection with other well connected countries) = Eigenvector x 100
FDI Inflows
not related to
number of
treaties
signed
FDI Inflows are
correlated with
Outflows; high FDI
outflows from Europe,
US, Japan and China
Most high FDI Inflow
countries belong to the
EU and the Energy
Charter; Other
multilateral treaties do
not indicate a
correlation.
Sovereign Risk and
Governance Score affect
FDI inflow positively
Within region – no
common relationship
between Network
Efficiency and FDI inflows
across regions
6. Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Angola
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
BahrainBangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria Burkina Faso
Burundi
Côte d'Ivoire
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada Cape Verde
CAR
Chad
Chile
China
Colombia
Comoros
Congo
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Costa Rica
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Finland
France
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Grenada
Guatemala
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
HaitiHonduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Korea, Dem. People's Rep. of
Korea, Republic of
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macao
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Moldova
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nepal
NetherlandsNew Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palestine
Panama
Papua New Guinea
ParaguayPeru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Romania
Russian Federation
Rwanda
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Somalia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Togo
Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan UAE
Uganda
UK
Ukraine
Uruguay
USA
Uzbekistan
Venezuela
Viet Nam
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
SCOPE : DO TREATIES BENEFIT AFRICAN ECONOMIES?
214 Countries, 6350 Ties
Algeria
Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Côte d'Ivoire
Cameroon
CAR
Chad
Comoros
Congo
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Djibouti
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali Mauritania
Mauritius
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
Sao Tome and Principe
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
Sudan
Swaziland
Tanzania
Togo
Tonga
Tunisia
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe
World Treaties Focus on Africa
55 Countries, 990 Ties
7. CREATING THE NETWORK
Undirected Network
Between countries through BITs and multilateral trade agreements
based on data available with UNCTAD.
Treaty network of tie strength greater than 2 was selected
for analysis - implies that all countries with at least 2 ratified
BIT or participating in two multilateral trade agreements
would be included
Country
Parameters
FDI Inflow
(Mean from 2010-2014, flows, $ Mn)
FDI Outflow
(Mean from 2010-2014, flows, $ Mn)
GDP 2014 ($ Bn)
Governance Score
(World Bank data)
Sovereign Risk Score
Trading Economics Rating- between 100
(riskless) and 0 (likely to default).
BIT (Ratified)
2
BIT (Signed)
1
1 Multilateral Trade Treaty
1
1 BIT + 2 Multilateral Trade Treaties
3
8. FDI INFLOWS & OUTFLOWS ARE CORRELATED
Size proportional to GDP
Correlated by Region
Net Investors
Net Receivers
By Country- Identifies Investors and Receivers
9. Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Armenia Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Belarus
Belgium
Benin
Bhutan
Bolivia
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Chad
Comoros
Côte d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Egypt
Estonia Finland
France
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
GermanyGreece
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Italy
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Libya
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Mauritania
Mexico
Mongolia
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Nepal
Netherlands
Niger
Nigeria
Norway
Palestine
Oman
Pakistan
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Romania
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Somalia
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Tajikistan
Thailand
Togo
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Uganda
Ukraine
UAE
UK
USA
Uzbekistan
Viet Nam
YemenASEAN
EU
Energy Charter
GCC
League of Arab States
OIC
SAFTA
NAFTA
FDI INFLOWS ARE LIMITED TO A FEW MULTILATERAL TREATIES
Size proportional to FDI Inflow
10. Credit Score & FDI Inflow
listed below Country
Name
NETWORK DOES NOT LEAD TO HIGHER FDI INFLOWS
*Network
Efficiency(Measure of
connection with other
well connected
countries) =
Eigenvector x 100
FDIInflow$M
13. High Level Leaders
Credit Score listed
below Country Name
HIGH LEVEL LEADERS HAVE LOW RISK & GOOD GOVERNANCE SCORES
Size proportional to GDP
Network Efficiency
USA
14. Algeria
Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Côte d'Ivoire
Cameroon
CAR
Chad
Comoros
Congo
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Djibouti
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
Sao Tome and Principe
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
Sudan
Swaziland
Tanzania
Togo
Tonga
Tunisia
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe
AFRICA TREATY NETWORKS ARE DENSE, ALIGNED BY REGION
55 Countries, 990 tiesSize proportional to FDI Inflow Net FDI Outflow Countries
East & Southern Africa
Central Africa
North & West Africa
15. MULTILATERAL TREATIES DON’T GENERATE HIGHER FDI INFLOWS
Algeria
Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
CameroonCAR
Chad
Comoros
Congo
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Côte d'Ivoire
Djibouti
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger Nigeria
Rwanda
Sao Tome and Principe
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
Sudan
Swaziland
Tanzania
Togo
Tunisia
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe
AU
CEMAC
COMESA
EAC
ECCAS
ECOWAS
League of Arab States
OIC
Size proportional to FDI Inflow
16. Afghanistan
Algeria
Angola
Azerbaijan
Bangladesh
Benin
Bhutan
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Côte d'Ivoire
Cameroon
CAR
Chad
China
Comoros
Congo
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Djibouti
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
India
Iran
Iraq
Japan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Korea, Dem. People's Rep. of
Korea, Republic of
Kyrgyzstan
Liberia
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Maldives
Mali
Mauritania
MauritiusMongolia
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Nepal
Niger
Nigeria
Pakistan
Rwanda
Sao Tome and Principe
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Swaziland
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Togo
Tunisia
Turkmenistan
Uganda
Uzbekistan
Zambia
Zimbabwe
THE ASIAN INTEREST: CHINA, KOREA & JAPAN LINK TO AFRICA
Size proportional to FDI Outflow Net FDI Outflow Countries
17. Algeria
Angola
Armenia
Austria
Belgium
Benin
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Côte d'Ivoire
Cameroon
CAR
Chad
Comoros
Congo
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
DjiboutiEgypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Finland
France
Gabon
Gambia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Luxembourg
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Malta
Mauritania
Mauritius
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Netherlands
NigerNigeria
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Rwanda
Sao Tome and Principe
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Slovakia
Slovenia
Somalia
South Africa
Spain
Sudan
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Tanzania
Togo
Tonga
TunisiaTurkey
Uganda
UK
Zambia
Zimbabwe
EUROPE IS DEEPLY INVESTED IN AFRICA
Size proportional to FDI Outflow Net FDI Outflow Countries
18. AFRICA: FDI INFLOWS DEPEND ON RISK SCORE, NETWORK EFFICIENCY
Angola
Instability
Size ~ GDP
Network Efficiency
FDIInflows$M
19. Albania
Algeria
Argentina
Armenia
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahrain
Belarus
Belgium
Benin
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cameroon
Canada
CAR
Chad
China
Comoros
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Egypt
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Finland
France
Gabon
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Guinea
Hungary
Iceland
India
Iran
IraqItaly
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Korea, Dem. People's Rep. of
Korea, Republic of
Kuwait
Latvia
Lebanon
Libya
Malawi
Malaysia
Mali
Malta
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mongolia
Morocco
Mozambique
Netherlands
Niger
Nigeria
Oman
Pakistan
Palestine
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Romania
Russian Federation
Rwanda
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Somalia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Thailand
Togo
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
UAE
Uganda
UK
USA
Uzbekistan
Viet Nam
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
EGYPT: WELL NETWORKED = HIGH FDI FLOWS
Governance Score -.7620
Risk Score (100) 28
FDI Inflow $ 4614 M
Degree 106
Size proportional to FDI Inflow Net FDI Outflow Countries
20. BUT FDI INFLOW IS VIA A FEW COUNTRIES
Size proportional to FDI Outflow Net FDI Outflow Countries
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Angola
Azerbaijan
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Benin
Botswana
Brunei Darussalam
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cameroon
Cape Verde
CAR
Chad
Comoros
Congo
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Côte d'Ivoire
Djibouti
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Indonesia Iran
IraqJordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Nepal
NigerNigeria
Palestine Oman
Pakistan
Qatar
Rwanda
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Syria
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Togo
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Uganda
UAE
UzbekistanYemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
AU
COMESA
OIC
League of Arab States
Argentina
Armenia
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Belarus
Belgium
Benin
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Canada
CAR
China
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Côte d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Egypt
Eritrea
Finland
France Germany
Ghana
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
India
Iran
Iraq
Italy
Japan
KenyaKorea, Dem. People's Rep. of
Korea, Republic of
Kuwait
Latvia
Malta
Mongolia
Netherlands
Pakistan
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russian Federation
Rwanda
Senegal
Serbia
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sweden Switzerland
Thailand
Togo
UK
USA
Viet Nam
Multilateral Treaties… ….and Bilateral Treaties
72 Bilateral Treaties4 Multilateral Treaties
Governance Score -.7620
Risk Score (100) 28
FDI Inflow $ 4614 M
https://en.portal.santandertrade.com/establish-overseas/egypt/foreign-investment
85% FDI
From 7 countries
21. Algeria
Benin
Burkina Faso
Côte d'Ivoire
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Chad
China
Comoros
Djibouti
Egypt
Ethiopia
Finland
France
Gabon
Gambia
Germany
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Italy
Korea, Republic of
Kuwait
Liberia
Libya
Mali
Mauritania
Mozambique
Netherlands
Niger
Nigeria
Romania
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Sierra Leone
South Africa
Sudan
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Togo
Tunisia
Turkey
Uganda
UK
NIGERIA: SMALLER NETWORK WITH COUNTRIES THAT INVEST
Governance Score -.9520
Risk Score (100) 28
FDI Inflow $ 5918 M
Degree 45
Size proportional to FDI Outflow Net FDI Outflow Countries
22. NIGERIA: HIGHER FDI INFLOW VIA FEWER COUNTRIES
Algeria
Angola
AU
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Côte d'Ivoire
Cameroon
Cape Verde
CAR
Chad
Comoros
Congo
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Djibouti
ECOWAS
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Kenya Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Malawi
Mali
Mauritania
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
OIC
Rwanda
Sao Tome and Principe
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Tanzania
Togo
Tunisia
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe
China
Finland
France
Germany
Italy
Korea, Republic of
Netherlands
Nigeria Romania
Serbia
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
UK
Governance Score -.9520
Risk Score (100) 28
FDI Inflow $ 5918 M
Degree 45
Net FDI Outflow CountriesSize proportional to FDI Outflow
14 Bilateral Treaties3 Multilateral Treaties
Multilateral Treaties… ….and Bilateral Treaties
United States
But enjoys higher FDI Inflows because of oil
80% FDI
From 3 countries
23. Algeria
Angola
Argentina
China
Congo
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Cuba
Czech Republic
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Ethiopia
Finland
Gabon
Germany
Ghana
Greece
GuineaIran
Italy
Korea, Republic of
Libya
Mauritius
Mozambique
Nigeria
Paraguay
Russian Federation
Rwanda
South Africa
Sweden
Tunisia
Uganda
SOUTH AFRICA: CONNECTED TO FEWER INVESTORS BUT BETTER
GOVERNANCE AND RISK SCORE
Governance Score .265
Risk Score (100) 49
FDI Inflow $ 4713 M
Degree 30
Size proportional to FDI Outflow Net FDI Outflow Countries
24. Algeria
Angola
Argentina
China
Congo
Congo, Democratic Repub
Cuba Czech Republic
Egypt
Equatorial Gu
Ethiopia
Finland
Gabon
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Guinea
Iran
Italy
Korea, Republic of
Libya
Mauritius
Mozambique
Nigeria
Paraguay
Russian Federation
Rwanda
South Africa
Sweden
Tunisia
Uganda
SOUTH AFRICA: 1 MULTILATERAL TREATY, FDI NOT DEPENDENT ON
BILATERAL TREATIES
Algeria
Angola
AU
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Côte d'Ivoire
Cameroon
Cape Verde
CAR
Chad
Comoros
Congo
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Djibouti
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Ghana
Guinea
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Malawi
Mauritania
Mozambique
Namibia
NigerNigeria
Rwanda
Sao Tome and Principe
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
South Africa
Sudan
Swaziland
Tanzania
Togo
Tunisia
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe
28 Bilateral Treaties1 Multilateral Treaty
Multilateral Treaties… ….and Bilateral Treaties
Governance Score .265
Risk Score (100) 49
FDI Inflow $ 4713 M Includes 4 countries outside treaty network
Size proportional to FDI Outflow
United States
Netherlands
UK
Japan
85% FDI
from 6 countries
Net FDI Outflow Countries
25. SIMILAR GDP, BUT KENYA GETS LOWER FDI INFLOWS VS ETHIOPIA
Poor-quality infrastructure, lack of security due to terrorism
and an unfavorable business climate in Kenya
Burundi
Comoros
Djibouti
Egypt
Eritrea
France
Italy
Kenya
Korea, Republic of
Kuwait
Libya Malawi
Mauritius
Netherlands
Rwanda
Seychelles
Sudan
Swaziland
Switzerland
Tanzania
Uganda
UK
Zambia Zimbabwe
AlgeriaAustria
China
Denmark
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Ethiopia
Finland
France
Germany Iran
Israel
Italy
Kuwait
Libya
Malaysia
Netherlands
Nigeria
South Africa
Sudan
Sweden
Switzerland
Tunisia
Turkey
Yemen
Degree 23
GDP 2014 $ 61 B
Governance Score -0.285
Network Efficiency 3.1
Risk / Credit Score (100) 20
Degree 24
GDP 2014 $ 54 B
Governance Score -0.641
Network Efficiency 5.1
Risk / Credit Score (100) 31
FDI Inflow: $ 1129 MFDI Inflow: $ 629 M
Kenya Ethiopia
26. DO TRADE TREATIES RESULT IN HIGHER FDI INFLOWS FOR DEVELOPING
COUNTRIES?
What Affects FDI
Inflows?
Governance Score
Sovereign Risk
Treaties with FDI
exporting countries
Network Efficiency
GDP
A Combination of
Factors
What Does Not
Affect FDI
Inflows?
Number of
Treaties signed
Participation in
Multilateral
Agreements
29. DATA REFERENCES
The World Bank
Governance Score: http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/worldwide-governance-indicators
UNCTAD
UNCTAD Website: http://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx?sCS_ChosenLang=en
FDI Mean Inflow: Average of countrywise FDI inflow data from 2010-14 (flows) in $ Mn
FDI Mean Outflow: Average of countrywise FDI outflow data from 2010-14 (flows) in $ Mn
FDI Dummy: +1 if net FDI receiver, -1 if net FDI Investor
GDP 2014 in $ Bn
TradingEconomics.com
Credit Risk Score: http://www.tradingeconomics.com/country-list/rating
30. ADDITIONAL REFERENCES
FDI Promotion through Bilateral Investment Treaties: More Than a Bit? - Matthias
Busse, Jens Königer and Peter Nunnenkamp
https://www.ifw-members.ifw-kiel.de/publications/fdi-promotion-through-bilateral-investment-treaties-more-than-a-
bit/Kiel%20Working%20Paper%201403.pdf
Does Joining International Treaties Attract Foreign Investment? Experimental Firm-
Level Evidence
http://www.columbia.edu/~ym2297/KenyonMargalit_March_2014.pdf
A BIT IS BETTER THAN A LOT Bilateral Investment Treaties and Preferential Trade
Agreements
http://faculty.georgetown.edu/mlb66/BITs%20and%20PTAs.pdf
An Anatomy of the World Trade Network (July 2013)
http://www.hkeconomy.gov.hk/en/pdf/An%20Anatomy%20of%20the%20World%20Trade%20Network%20(July%202013).pdf
Global Investment Trends Monitor - UNCTAD
http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/webdiaeia2016d1_en.pdf